2321
Comments (54)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

By which you mean, the denial part of it? They could certainly do the thing itself. They've already executed one unarmed woman for being a dissident on video.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty sure that's an estimate of the number of people who were there, not people who were actually killed.

Either way, I didn't realize it had to reach a specific threshold before it warranted whatever response would stop them from "getting away" with it. They're good as long as it doesn't break, say, 10k? As long as they keep it to mini-Tianenmens where they firebomb 1k here, drone strike 1k there, the government executions would be acceptable?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
tabularasa_556 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm still fuzzy on what entity has both the means and the motive to stop it. There's active death camps in China right now and the US won't do anything because it's a "cultural difference". Say they just start rounding up 20 million people in camps. The US are the ones doing it, China told them to do it, and UN has called to offer help, who exactly is going to stop them?