2194
Comments (264)
sorted by:
301
Qanaut 301 points ago +309 / -8

Either way, the people win.

Option 1: Release the results, proving without a shadow of a doubt that the 2020 election was stolen and that treason against the United States was committed.

Option 2: Seize the results, proving without a shadow of a doubt that the United States Government has and continues to committed treason against the Republic of the United States of America.

271
Kramit 271 points ago +274 / -3

You're underestimating how many fucking stupid people there are in this country. First, the smart ones KNOW it was stolen and this audit won't be news to us. Second, the other half doesn't care even IF it was stolen and they blatantly admitted it they'd still claim muh hoax RuSsSSIAAaas!!

116
potbelliedgoblino 116 points ago +116 / -0

And the reason they don't care if it was stolen is critically important: they believe the US govt is their friend/the good guy.

47
Fuck_The_NWO 47 points ago +47 / -0

Wait until the Government throws them under the bus and then they have no one since the other half of the country hates them as well.

31
NormaJeanRocks 31 points ago +31 / -0

I still think they'll think the Government did that in their best interest.

17
zillat 17 points ago +17 / -0

It won't matter when the communists come for them, I won't be there to help them and neither will you. This alone give me great comfort. At this point, (if it clear we are not going to prevail) I would join Antifa rather than help the sheep in the middle...

6
BingusCombat 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can't talk too much shit, I thought Trump would cross the rubicon, in retrospect that was a stupid expectation

6
ViduusMAGA 6 points ago +6 / -0

It may have been better he didn’t.

The big lie and everything they’re doing has become open public knowledge. I have random waitresses and hairstylists mentioning it out of the blue.

A crazy tattooed model chick “came out” as libertarian to me over the child indoctrination...

Trump just gave the world the final piece of evidence the woke communists are real and they’re really subverting America.

1
MAGALOVER 1 point ago +1 / -0

I humbly disagree.

I'd rather have one fourth of the country remain ignorant of the evil Deep State, than have Trump DESTROY it.... inch by inch.... for the next 4 years.

1
Desert_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

That day can't come soon enough.

1
BigBadJim 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm looking forward to Judgement Day...

Revelation is playing so on time.

66
ModernDayMao 66 points ago +66 / -0

Exactly this reminds me of the day after the election and Geraldo Rivera bluntly said idk if it was stolen but I have a nice house and don’t want civil unrest to disturb my life.

16
MocksFordComma 16 points ago +16 / -0

Bad news coming’ …

9
ALargeRock 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thought that was Greg gutfield or whatever his name is. Or am I thinking about the Floyd cop trial?

8
Jackno8d 8 points ago +8 / -0

Greg is pretty based, totally sounds like Geraldo though. With thinking like that I bet his life is actually as empty as Al Capone’s vault.

5
ModernDayMao 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah he pulled a similar move with that trial, fucking cowards both of them.

3
I_Used_to_be_me 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea I think Gutfeld said it regarding the trial. Something along the lines of “I’m glad Chauvin got convicted, I don’t want my neighborhood burnt down” or something to that extent

1
MAGALOVER 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gutfeld is a self-absorbed, greedy coward.

He almost CRIED on air when he said that he had a to buy a gun.

He's like the rest of Fox..... love Trump when he gets you ratings.

They DITCH conservative values when it takes any sacrifice, honesty, or courage.

10
Pax11B 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's the first thing I thought.

8
RolandDelacroix 8 points ago +8 / -0

Even the dumb ones know it was stolen

5
HunterBidensPC 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hence the second amendment

74
PEPEpeepee 74 points ago +74 / -0

If I hear that shit is going down I will be driving to AZ with my stockpile ready to water the tree.

29
Gwot0412 29 points ago +29 / -0

The drought has gone on for too long.

27
BidensPrisonWallet 27 points ago +28 / -1

Locals should be mustering nearby right now.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
5
Methuselahs_cat 5 points ago +5 / -0

When you "hear" of it--too late. The job's already done.

2
NoSteppy2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have recently moved to Cave Creek. It is lit up here. You are welcome to muster here. We have "plenty of water" here. Follow my account and see where I moved from 😉 Sometimes God gives you a sign.

64
deleted 64 points ago +65 / -1
35
Tweedlethree 35 points ago +35 / -0

The number of people who will believe or care about this is decreasing daily. Look at the ratings for MSM and White House propaganda. People who have been stirred up by the MSM do not have the longest attention spans. MAGA people on the other hand are still here and getting more and more determined as time goes on.

11
aaafirefly123 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hard for them to maintain the mob when the very thing they based their whole being against is no longer in power.

11
BillionsAndBillions 11 points ago +12 / -1

"Safeguarding sensitive voting records, and faith in our Democratic process", or some such tripe.

5
Junionthepipeline 5 points ago +5 / -0

Oh well.at some point the good side has to realize the left will always lie to the stupid and just do what needs to be done.

20
wiseracer 20 points ago +21 / -1

Option 2 only requires Rachell Maddow crying and telling everyone that "Democracy˜ was saved by stopping this criminal audit!"

40
JokerPede 40 points ago +40 / -0

I hate that guy

9
Trump2024 9 points ago +9 / -0

Oh goodness! What if every one of her 143 viewers told another person and they told another person! In 30 days the message would be "fish fly south to Darbytown with a moon glow"

8
Women4Trump2020 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Fact Checkers will say “nothing to see here!” and sadly half of the country will go along with it

124
IHeartMyDoggy 124 points ago +125 / -1

The DOJ doesn’t have the authority to shut it down, does it? They don’t control a state

149
nozonozo 149 points ago +149 / -0

You are right, The DOJ has no authority in the matter.

But, Merrick Garland doesn't understand the constitution or how it is intended to work.

Hard to believe, outside of Clown World, that this guy was nominated for the Supreme Court.

112
HKFan 112 points ago +112 / -0

He understands it, he just doesn't care

32
Rekot24 32 points ago +32 / -0

criminals will always work to cover up their crimes. #1 priority

6
MICHIGANisRED 6 points ago +6 / -0

Probably wasn't his idea. He's just taking orders from the globohomos.

3
Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes

24
nozonozo 24 points ago +24 / -0

Oh, and let me add that the Supreme Court would say the DOJ doesn't have standing.

Pffffttttt!

19
NighT93 19 points ago +19 / -0

His disregard for the constitution is exactly why he was nominated.

14
JohnCocktoastin 14 points ago +24 / -10

Actually, they do. They have complete authority. In fact, the abdication of said authority is precisely why we are reliant upon the damn Arizona Senate to conduct this audit. The failure of the KFC Bucket DOJ to investigate ANY election fraud or take action against flagrant violations of federal election laws is why Xiden is resident.

I said awhile back on here "If I were them, I would send in the FBI to seize all of the election materials...ballots, machines, usb sticks, the whole 9. I'd do this under the guise of 'investigating' irregularities. And I'd give it the hunter biden laptop treatment. Just disappear it. Release some bogus 'nothing to see here' report after the 2024 election."

Likewise, I'd argue that Arizona State Police have authority to arrest anyone interfering in their lawful and good faith investigation of election irregularities and charge them with obstruction of justice. Any federal agent that attempts to come down to the audit to fuck around can find out.

18
PaineThomas 18 points ago +18 / -0

The DOJ only has jurisdiction over the Federal side of matters. The vote is a state issue. The electoral college aspect is a federal issue, but that won't grant them access to ballots.

-10
JohnCocktoastin -10 points ago +3 / -13

Where do people make this crap up?

52 USC §20701. Retention and preservation of records and papers by officers of elections; deposit with custodian; penalty for violation

Every officer of election shall retain and preserve, for a period of twenty-two months from the date of any general, special, or primary election of which candidates for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, or Resident Commissioner from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico are voted for, all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such election, except that, when required by law, such records and papers may be delivered to another officer of election and except that, if a State or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico designates a custodian to retain and preserve these records and papers at a specified place, then such records and papers may be deposited with such custodian, and the duty to retain and preserve any record or paper so deposited shall devolve upon such custodian. Any officer of election or custodian who willfully fails to comply with this section shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

How do you suppose they'd enforce that statute without access to the ballots? Man...the "lets make some shit up" is in full force these days.

12
PaineThomas 12 points ago +13 / -1

That has nothing to do with votes. That has to with records of who voted and any poll taxes, which are now unconstitutional. Pot, meet kettle.

-1
JohnCocktoastin -1 points ago +1 / -2

Pretty much anything “requisite” to voting is a record. And that includes the ballots. If you haven’t ever dug into this, there have been lawsuits over the format of the ballots. There have been suits over any number of “ballot” issues that people contend are discriminatory for one reason or another. A requisite to casting a vote in an election is actually having a ballot. Thus, under the statute, it is a record that must be preserved. You can’t vote without one. This is not rocket surgery.

-2
JohnCocktoastin -2 points ago +1 / -3

https://www.justice.gov/criminal/file/1029066/download

Just to be even more clear. Go to page 75-76 of the doc, or what appears to be page 87-88 of the PDF.

  1. Retention of Federal Election Records: 52 U.S.C. § 20701 The detection, investigation, and proof of election crimes – and in many instances Voting Rights Act violations – often depend on documentation generated during the voter registration, voting, tabulation, and election certification processes. In recognition of this fact, and the length of time it can take for credible evidence suggesting election fraud or voting rights violations to develop, Congress enacted Section 20701 to require that documentation generated in connection with the voting and registration process be retained for twenty-two months if it pertained to an election that included a federal candidate.

(a) Legislative purpose and background The voting process generates voluminous documents and records, ranging from voter registration forms and absentee ballot applications to ballots and tally reports. If election fraud occurs, these records often play an important role in the detection and prosecution of the crime. Documentation generated by the election process also plays an equally important role in the detection, investigation, and prosecution of federal civil rights violations.

So you got lots of crow to eat. I can get more if you’re hungry.

-2
JohnCocktoastin -2 points ago +1 / -3

O'Neil v. Hosemann, 2018 WL 6188292 (S.D.Miss., 2018) “Under the current statutory scheme, absentee ballots received after November 26 at 5:00 p.m. are not counted. But, they are marked as being late, and the time is noted. Miss. Code Ann. § 23-15-637. Those ballots are then maintained for 22 months. See 52 U.S.C. § 20701;”

How’s the crow taste?

4
stagolee 4 points ago +4 / -0

That doesn't mean they can simply seize the ballots and prevent states from viewing them. Elections are still overseen by the states, and they have a valid legal interest in auditing the vote.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +2 / -1

They can because there is no law enforcement jurisdictional argument here. This is in the custody of a third party at the request of the Arizona legislature. The feds could simply waltz in and take it. If the Arizona State Police had custody, it would be an entirely different story. Then there would be a jurisdictional argument to be made. And AZ police could tell them to fuck off.

1
cryogen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely AZ police bow to AZ before Feds.

3
KeysToNeW 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who pays ya bud

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +2 / -1

My clients

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

This can be used to argue for custody over the ballots, though you'd appear to need a justification made up that says AZ does not have the authority to transfer custody during an audit, or that the preservation of records was in jeopardy. They might be able to get away with those, but it's one of the largest stretches in history, given how much transparency there was with the AZ audit. And how much greater the transparency was than the normal standard. So I'd expect a legal challenge in this to favor the AZ audit, though a delay could happen, and anything can happen in corrupt courts.

Having said that, it's not entirely relevant any more.

If the audit went through all the pallets, then the DoJ seized them, the auditors don't really need the ballots in hand anymore to announce their findings or do analysis of whatever they recorded. What ballot seizure could interfere with would be a 3rd party trying to verify some of the claims, but there's no apparent way to seize the findings of the audit and prevent disclosure once the ballot audits have finished.

Although you said anything requisite to vote is a "record" that could be granted federal jurisdiction for seizure, it's not really credible to claim this applies to the audit findings after those materials were used. If someone reports on what they saw when going through records, it does not violate the preservation of those material ballot records that were analyzed. Maybe they could have tried this con to prevent the auditors from accessing the ballots at the start, but it seems to me that any release of findings and analysis, after all ballots were audited, out cannot really be argued to interfere with safekeeping of election records.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anything generated out of the election is considered a “record” under that statute. So they “could” take anything from the audit findings. They’d just need the slightest justification for it.

You will not get some court involved in this, especially once it has already been taken. They won’t do it though. Not sure why they’ve been floating it around. Would have been smarter to do it from the beginning rather than wait until the end to start. But I could totally see them doing this in any other state thinking of beginning an audit.

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't see where in your quotes it says a post-election audit analysis could count as a record, it seems to specifically refer to the records of the vote itself and materials required in the voting process, such as things used for registration. That is, something that is "requisite to voting".

"... all records and papers which come into his possession relating to any application, registration, payment of poll tax, or other act requisite to voting in such..."

So while I see there being disingenuous means to block auditors from having access to ballots and relevant material at the beginning (or a means for the Feds to audit election regularities at the beginning -- as you had also mentioned), I don't see relevance to these laws in seizing findings of the audit. Audit results are not requisite, or involved in, votes cast or registration, etc, for the 2020 election.

Also, if this interpretation stood, it appears you're basically saying that any discussion or analysis of 2020 could be a "record" and be seized. Implying that Feds could seize any media coverage of it under the same rule, and effectively censor national elections entirely. Surely that would be a stretch.

7
Kramit 7 points ago +7 / -0

FAFO

6
Ophelia 6 points ago +6 / -0

All those movies about when the corrupt feds try to take over a local case And the sheriffs were pissed off were true.

3
Junionthepipeline 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well they did seize and destroy a lot of ballots in Georgia

2
Yahyeetw 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're wrong. This is a state auditing their election. No federal entity can interject

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +4 / -2

Show me where some state doing something precludes the DOJ from using their lawful powers? I’m not saying the feds actually plan to do something lawful. But why does the audit prevent them from conducting their own “fraud” investigations? https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/52/20511 Voter fraud is a federal crime. DOJ could lawfully take possession of all of those machines/ballots/usb sticks and everything related to that election as evidence. And even better yet, without a warrant. Because some third party is in possession of the evidence and “exigent circumstances” justify the immediate requisition of the evidence to safeguard against its destruction.

We don’t have to approve of nor believe their bogus story. But we also don’t have to lie to ourselves about what the law is and the basis for them to act. The only reason they haven’t acted is unrelated to legality. It is the optics of shutting it down. They know they might as well surrender that AZ was fraud if they do it.

2
ItCameTrue 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m going to need you to check the tenth amendment and show me what article of the constitution allows for federal squashing of state audits.

I’ll wait.

1
JohnCocktoastin 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m going to need you to check the constitution and show me where there are audit provisions.

I’ll wait.

2
NonyaDB 2 points ago +2 / -0

A law is only a law as long as a vast majority of people believe it is a law.
As we've seen before with the Bundy Ranch standoff, they can send a whole company of armed federal agents to Arizona but if they're met with a battalion of armed citizens and cops who tell them to go away, they're going to go the fuck away and try it in the court of public opinion via their controlled media instead.

1
MrAnderson1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bullshit. Your comment is bullshit. The States run the elections and auditing those elections is a part of running them. The Feds interfering with the election audit no matter what comes out of their mouth while they do it is the Feds interfering with the election audit.

It's the end of The Republic if they force a stand-off. They can survive this and surviving this is where they need their heads to be. They lost control of the narrative. They need to just stop digging. One path they live to fight another day. The other, they don't.

2
JohnCocktoastin 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you read my comments, you'd see I said that the AZ police could infer this to be obstruction of justice under AZ state law. None of what I said is bullshit. What you are saying is bullshit. The feds have absolute right to enforce federal laws. Period. End of story. There is no "state audit privilege" that you or others fabricate out of thin air that precludes them from doing it. The timing of their decision in the middle of the audit would be evidence that they don't intend to actually be enforcing federal law, and would support the obstruction charge. But for you to act like what I am saying is bullshit is just your bias coming right through. I think its bullshit that the feds would attempt this, but I don't think that it is somehow unconstitutional or that some law exists that precludes them from doing it. Because I'm not retarded.

Feds can simultaneously try this, be charged under state law, and also exercise their own jurisdiction over the evidence. It'd be one helluva show down that nobody, including them wants. Which is why it hasn't happened yet.

1
MrAnderson1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're full of it. Sorry but you just are. The Feds can "do" anything they want but one of the thngs they can't "do" is interfere with a State's elections and that includes its audits.

There is no specific "law" that mentions audits that I am aware of but that's not how the law works. The law doesn't exhaustly name every possible human behavior which could be taken by any human ever and categorize it apriori. So your point is a red herring.

The Constitution gives all power to the States to conduct their elections. That includes printing the ballots, tabulating etc. etc. etc. If the Feds went in and interfered with that, in this case physically seizing any part of it or preventing it from completing or being published, then the Feds are simply breaking Federal Constitutional law.

You just think the Feds can do any old thing they want for whatever reason they want so long as they speak plausible words while doing it. Wrong. Dead wrong.

If a criminal punches somebody and claims they had a right to punch them for some bogus reason, the criminal is just acting criminally.

The victim doesn't need a court to find for them before they can protect themselves from the criminal's unlawful actions, they can just do it. The criminal is arrested then the criminal get their trial.

Exact same thing here. No one has to care except- the judge, jury, prosecutors and Fed's lawyers- why the Feds attempted to interfere with an audit of a state's election being lawfully conducted by that state. Doing that will land them in jail. Attempting to do it at the point of a gun will yield a lethal response because at that point you're just an armed felon committing a felony.

You just can't grasp that state's have rights which supercede the whatever the Feds' have invented for themselves, but it's quite explicit in the Constitution in this instance and the Constitution is the supreme law of the land.

5
FreddyThePatriot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only two members of the court give a fucking about the constitution

0
Sumarongi 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hmm… let’s see…

book deal… save the country… book deal… save the country

Hmmmm… my job is sooo hard….

There are riots though, so book deal it is..

19
Jestre 19 points ago +19 / -0

'The illegal we do immediately. The unconstitutional takes a little longer.'

14
Moose0528 14 points ago +14 / -0

Whoever uses the most force has the authority. If the DOJ rolls in with swat teams and armored vehicles and a bigger force is not there to counter them then they have the authority.

1
MrAnderson1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doesn't matter. If the Feds did that it would be the start of the end of this country. Don't doubt it. People are going to do more than whine. First States would start nullifying laws left and right especially gun laws. Then there would be tax rebellions. Then street violence. Then troops, then open rebellion amongst the troops, then cities would burn and mass population shifts as the whole thing spins out of control.

Do't kid yourself how far people ahve been pushed by Burn Loot Murde and Woke and trannys-in-your-panties and birthing people and an obviously senile President and snotty cackling middle school whore. Don't fucking kid yourself.

They stole and election and got what they got. If they think they can shut it all down at the point of a gun and some black heliocopters they've got another think coming.

5
MagaMagaChooChoo 5 points ago +10 / -5

They can do anything they want. They control the media and they stole an election without challenge or consequence.

5
Hangemh1gh 5 points ago +5 / -0

When has that ever stopped them?

5
Junionthepipeline 5 points ago +5 / -0

Cliven bundy stopped them

93
TheKillerStove 93 points ago +93 / -0

I truly believe that seizing the audit would be the breaking point for a lot of people. People have said that Rittenhouse is the hill they are willing to die on, but I honestly feel the rage generated from a seizure would dwarf even that.

70
ShyRipley 70 points ago +70 / -0

I think you're right. I'm a pacifist, mostly. I am one of the most non-violent type persons anyone can meet. I'm a chick. I hate confrontations.

But right now, reading this tweet twice now on here tonight... my jaw is clenched, teeth gritted and I'm pretty sure I have steely eyes. I am so angry at even the thought that the federal government is considering forcibly entering a state to seize The People's ballots and SACRED election evidence.

So angry.

42
BrakeRemovalMechanic 42 points ago +42 / -0

Ditto. This isn't the hill we die on. This is the hill we kill our enemies for trying to climb.

23
thelastlast 23 points ago +23 / -0

same. my blood pressure, jesus.

19
incogneato 19 points ago +20 / -1

Same here. Seizing The People's Ballots JUST TO HIDE THEIR OWN CRIMES

0
Junionthepipeline 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your a state late

12
Ophelia 12 points ago +12 / -0

We were so nice and patient to wait until the audit was done properly.

DONT FUCK WITH US NOW YA HEAR ?

9
Ben45 9 points ago +9 / -0

sounds like wife material lads

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

I do believe I just blushed. Thank you kind sir. :)

2
Ben45 2 points ago +2 / -0

good to know that after a year of lockdowns I still know how to compliment a woman lol

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just laughed out loud for real. You still got it Fren :D

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
85
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 85 points ago +85 / -0

Push us, DOJ.

36
Women4Trump2020 36 points ago +36 / -0

We need armed patriots protecting the ballots and the AZ National Guard protecting them from the Feds unconstitutional actions trying to subvert a state’s rights.

23
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 23 points ago +23 / -0

Bingo. 1776.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
11
newrandomperson 11 points ago +13 / -2

This IS one of the lines. One of those times when the people on this site need to start talking and organizing, what to do if...

17
Thetigerpoppy 17 points ago +17 / -0

Actually people in or around AZ who can meet in person need to while the rest of us need to stay informed. The last place any organizing should take place is on this site and since this is a matter that is related to a particular area its those in or around that area who aren't going anywhere anyway that need to consider what the future holds and how to act. I can't imagine the AZ government would let the fed sieze the documents but I guess we will see.

14
newrandomperson 14 points ago +14 / -0

100%. Online organization is a terrible idea. People in Arizona should be contacting their various representatives about this, and contacting each other about this.

6
ObongoForPrison2020 6 points ago +18 / -12

Don't make veiled threats you don't plan to follow through on.

33
Taqiyya_Mockingbird 33 points ago +34 / -1

There was a veil?

6
PaineThomas 6 points ago +7 / -1

Flag outside my house makes my point clear. No step on Snek. Tyranny deserves bullets.

3
whataboob 3 points ago +3 / -0

FBI man with stick meme poking Pepe to do something

Except the FBI guy is MAGA, and Pepe is the DOJ.

1
MrAnderson1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's just like every other known phenomena with a tipping point. Everything seems like it's under control, like it's not chaotic.... and then ... and then......it's not anymore.

61
BlancoBasura 61 points ago +61 / -0

Hopefully some bright spark on the audit crew is squirreling away encrypted copies of everything.

With a deadman switch to release it all.

31
thelastlast 31 points ago +31 / -0

you almost have to do this no matter who you are and what you're doing these days

4
Ophelia 4 points ago +4 / -0

Deadman’s switch? They better not fuck with those AZ volunteers. 😡

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're up in Montana.

37
ScottyGunn 37 points ago +37 / -0

They can't have this become public, after all, remember, "there's no proof".

26
Easter_Bunny 26 points ago +27 / -1

That might actually start the boog.

23
BillionsAndBillions 23 points ago +24 / -1

Pretty sure 80% of Americans don't even know there is an AZ audit, or what an audit is.

14
BigIronBigIron 14 points ago +14 / -0

What time's The Bachelorette on?

15
JohnCocktoastin 15 points ago +15 / -0

Did you hear Toobin is back? Everyone at CNN decided to give him a helping hand to re-arouse his flacid career.

7
BigIronBigIron 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nominative determinism strikes again!

The Trump card, the vice president Biding his time, the Weiner kerfuffle, Dr. Fauci the grim reaper whose name means sickle in Italian, the man caught jerking off to Tube sites on a conference call...

1
I_Used_to_be_me 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Falce” means sickle in Italian. “Fauci” means “jaws”

20
UndercoverSpez 20 points ago +20 / -0

Why is this guy creditable?

19
Liberty0rdeath 19 points ago +19 / -0

Working hard with MI audits and frequently talks with Bannon. I think he knows more than we do.

And it seems logic after DOJ statement today.

2
stagolee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why would people in Garland's circle be talking to him? They wouldn't.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Embedded Patriot lyin' low. My guess.

8
HKFan 8 points ago +8 / -0

de Perno? He's doing the Michigan audit

0
ItCameTrue 0 points ago +1 / -1

He’s not creditable. You cannot charge his account.

He’s credible though, he’s been involved in election suits in MI for a while now.

20
BigIronBigIron 20 points ago +20 / -0

Nothing says 'legitimate government' like armed men blocking audit results & shoving all the evidence into cardboard boxes to be destroyed

7
Junionthepipeline 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's how you know it's like super extra legit.

15
bonedancr 15 points ago +15 / -0

dude that would be a flash fire of rage... lol

14
panthicc 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm not generally one to make predictions and there have been several times over the last year I thought something would be the "shot heard round the world" moment that wasn't.

That being said, I don't believe AZ Senate Republicans would willingly hand over their documents if an attempted seizure does occur, which creates a markedly different scenario from just a bunch of really pissed off Americans.

What the DOJ, military, law enforcement would do after that refusal to cooperate, I think, would become a very pivotal point in American history.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
panthicc 6 points ago +6 / -0

If Mitch McConnell was running this audit I'd have no hope. But to their credit, I feel like these particular Republicans at least have had several critical moments during the audit to cuck out and so far haven't.

14
BigFreedomBoner 14 points ago +14 / -0

84 million

13
iIndianaJones 13 points ago +13 / -0

I fucking dare them to do this DARE!

10
VarusSPQR 10 points ago +10 / -0

War.

10
neosin 10 points ago +10 / -0

expose the fraud or expose the fraud? Tough choice for commies

9
Jjones23 9 points ago +9 / -0

Do it.

9
Nimblenavigator1 9 points ago +9 / -0

Seize everything? On what possible grounds? I understand that rational thinking and the rule of law aren’t these people’s strong suits, but I can’t possibly see how they’d even go about doing this.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pull together a b.s. memo, then go full Soviet tanks into Czechoslovakia.

1
SilverStarv5 1 point ago +1 / -0

Brotherly Czechoslovakia?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
Metro 9 points ago +11 / -2

This should be an example for Trump-era DOJ who did NOTHING about elections. At least he’s got the balls to do something, let this be a lesson for Trump in 2024–FIRE EM IF THEY DONT DO THERE JOB!

8
XCorneliusX 8 points ago +8 / -0

Currently, the fed has no rights whatsoever to tamper with a State run election. That has existed from the start of our country. Trump DOJ followed the law. If they had not, it would have opened a box that would give precedent for future grabs by the fed. If the current fed does grab, then they lose. It is clearly illegal.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
7
GodKingHarambe 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can you imagine if this faggot had wound up on the Supreme Court?

7
Muttsbitetoo 7 points ago +7 / -0

Is this the hill?

7
PaineThomas 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Arizona Senate just came out and said that they will absolutely arrest Fauci and any others who step foot into Arizona or attempt to block the audit. Things are about to get interesting...

4
GainesvilleFlorida 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol what does Fauci have to do with an audit?

1
PaineThomas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. I meant Garland. My brain instantly went to Fauci given all the dumb shit he's said. Lol

1
I_Used_to_be_me 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nothing lol. But they did say they’d arrest anyone that tries to interfere, so I guess technically it applies to Fauci as well, if he tried to interfere for some reason ::shrug::

1
GainesvilleFlorida 1 point ago +1 / -0

He just wrote he meant to say Garland.

6
MAGAbeast2016 6 points ago +6 / -0

A few thousand Patriots heavily armed should surround the facility to protect it. If the government really wants to start a bloodbath let them come do it.

6
brotatofarmer 6 points ago +6 / -0

Cowabunga it is

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
BoltCarrierGroup 6 points ago +6 / -0

It’s about to really happen, isn’t it?

The powder keg seems full. The tree of liberty looks like it it needs some refreshing. And some tyrants have some blood to bleed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

AZ has Rangers.

.... Feds would be wise not to FAFO.

6
Lurker6 6 points ago +6 / -0

Someone link the "why not both?" meme for me. We need decertification and 80 million angry voters.

6
Analog1221 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck he DOJ! Fuck them to Hell! Fucking rotten no good cocksuckers!

5
VarusSPQR 5 points ago +5 / -0

They need to release the results they have right now. If the commie Do”J” do this it’s as good as a declaration of war.

5
Tweedlethree 5 points ago +5 / -0

They did not get to pass the bill they wanted but try to keep to the agenda anyway. The Federal government is now puffing smoke.

5
honkpillfarmer 5 points ago +5 / -0

This shit is completely fucked

Stock up on rounds and water

5
wiseracer 5 points ago +5 / -0

AZ better release what they know before it's all seized and they're thrown in the gulag. What wouldn't they do to keep this information from leaking?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
TrumpWinz 4 points ago +5 / -1

100000 people would kill Garland if he tried that shit

4
EvanGRogers 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like Atizona needs a militia

4
notCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

*120,000,000

4
bluebahloo 4 points ago +4 / -0

They're going to seize the evidence and give it to John Durham!

2
_Trunalimunumaprzure 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’ll get too it right after they’re done investigating things that look like nooses, and hunting down grandmas from January 6th

4
SkullE 4 points ago +4 / -0

A criminal will do anything to keep from getting caught. ANYTHING.

Send out the alarm. 50 thousand patriots need to surround that building.

4
Johnny108 4 points ago +4 / -0

They'll seize, alter and edit, then release a clean version.

4
DoesFreeSpeechExist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Jail all of them.

3
Tryan 3 points ago +3 / -0

There should be a massive amount of armed citizens waiting to kill the terrorists.

3
Thomas1963-1967 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think the Arizona Rangers will have something to say about that. I believe the phrase is Molon Labe.

3
Destineed369 3 points ago +3 / -0

We’re all gonna die ya know.

3
Dialectic 3 points ago +3 / -0

WAR

3
Lovestein20 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hate to be a negative cunt but will anything happen if the Arizona audits proves us right? I have no doubt in my mind that GA, PA, MI, AZ probably several other states, any that allow a non-partisan full forensic audit will prove us right but what happens from there? Arrests, decertified election results or just a "HA I TOLD YOU SO?" What do y'all think?

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fraud vitiates everything.

2
Zadok 2 points ago +3 / -1

Careful, I got banned for 3 days because I said nothing would happen.

1
_Trunalimunumaprzure 1 point ago +1 / -0

From here?

1
Zadok 1 point ago +1 / -0

Great awaking.

1
Lovestein20 1 point ago +1 / -0

I want something to happen. I want to see records numbers of arrests from top to bottom in all cases it applies I want to see a process that allows the US to reinstate our 45th and rightful 46th I’m just a realist. I hope the evidence is so blatantly obvious and apparent that these spineless politicians in mass have no course of action but to make immediate changes in the current admin. I hinge between the line of wanting and realism. I’m remaining hopeful but always assuming the worst too.

1
Sumarongi 1 point ago +2 / -1

Moral righteousness is the foundation towards instituting justice. Without being in the right, is it nothing but a coup

3
remember1776 3 points ago +4 / -1

Depends, which box are we on now?

2
ChynahIzAzzhole 2 points ago +2 / -0

War.

2
becomelions 2 points ago +2 / -0

If true, we need a wall of patriots around that audit 24/7 until it completes.

Someone in AZ needs to deputize a few thousand civilians to do security.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
3
2
Amaroq64 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's a very objective and neutral article. Thanks!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
XCorneliusX 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is not anonymous. Probably not recorded, but Washington Examiner has been solid as a source, save for the OpEd section for good reason as that is opinion anyway.

Garland made the comments during a policy speech on voting rights in Washington, D.C. He said the Civil Rights Division is going to need more lawyers and announced that within 30 days the Justice Department will double its "enforcement staff for protecting the right to vote."

The author with Washington Examiner is Daniel Chaitin, Deputy News Editor

1
stagolee 1 point ago +1 / -0

This doesn't address the claim made in the post.

2
MrAnderson1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah but seizing it would be them admitting we no longer live in a Democratic Republic under the Constitution.

The follow on consequences of that are so deep and so far reaching it would be recorded as the event which triggered the break-up of the United States of America.

It would also trigger ALL 50 States kicking off audits.

Think people love Biden? Think people love Kamala? Their only allies are blue dogs and the fucking press- what percent of the population is that?

It would trigger off a slowly building revolution which starts with States refusing to enforce gun laws of any sort, then onto tax rebellions -which have already started against Woke in Baltimore-, then onto street violence which the government would try to contain using US troops only to find that a lot of US troops aren't taking orders from The Potato, leading finally to them finding out how many people in Blue actually have nothing but open running contempt for them.

If they're smart, they'll just go along with the results, eat some shit while denying it's shit they're eating, try to spin the whole to their base and limp through through their illegitmate Presidency. Maybe people won't start demanding The Potato and The Whore get the fuck out of Washington.

If they're stupid they'll see this as their moment to turn this into the Great Decisive Event which permanently secures their one party rule for all time.