4201
Comments (214)
sorted by:
261
deleted 261 points ago +264 / -3
149
fuckfortysix 149 points ago +150 / -1

Chipmunk looking pedo faggot fuck.

70
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 70 points ago +70 / -0

They always look the same. This must be why they sought to eliminate profiling at an institutional level.

41
fuckfortysix 41 points ago +41 / -0

Ya or God is just making it easy for us.

14
TheWinningNeverStops 14 points ago +14 / -0

lmao

14
mestama 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's actually a scientifically verifiable affect/look. Facial recognition can pick out gay men with like a 80% accuracy. https://osf.io/zn79k/

5
ConcernedFrenchFrog 5 points ago +5 / -0

And yet, everybody knows it . But the modern polite world would want us to always act like our instincts are false so we can not wrongly mistreat someone that's innocent. Like 1 false positive invalidates 9 legit ones

3
I_Used_to_be_me 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's super interesting. I wish my brother and I could try it out to be honest, for no reason other than our almost identical looks (save for our hairstyles and facial hair), combined with me being straight, and him not being straight

1
Taliesin 1 point ago +1 / -0

But maybe you act differently, despite being twins.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
12
YourWifesBoyfriend 12 points ago +12 / -0

Classic chubby soy face

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
47
GreetingsEarthlings 47 points ago +47 / -0

He's forcing those chompers together to prevent the natural cuck mouth from happening in the hope that someone mistakes him for a man.

22
Buck_Fiden 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'm surprised he's not wearing two face masks in his profile photo.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
muslimporn 20 points ago +22 / -2

He has the face of cuckery.

18
onemoretimeagain22 18 points ago +18 / -0

Yup

177
Tenspot20 177 points ago +177 / -0

So she was not an employee when she made the announcement on air? This guy is a fucking dumbass!

111
onemoretimeagain22 111 points ago +111 / -0

He's a lying communist faggot

49
DoesFreeSpeechExist 49 points ago +49 / -0

Yup. Disinfo agents.

13
0care 13 points ago +13 / -0

they all are

67
559throw 67 points ago +67 / -0

SHE WAS RETROACTIVELY FIRED ACKSHYUALLY

14
Tenspot20 14 points ago +14 / -0

That's not what dick hole said.

25
559throw 25 points ago +25 / -0

If I cared about dick holes my name would be Kamala

3
DblFistinPiston 3 points ago +3 / -0

If I cared about all holes I would be Katie Hill.

1
OccasionalCortex21 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like Stalin erasing the people he purged from photos.

19
DaayTerkErJerbs 19 points ago +19 / -0

You know how many people will just assume he's telling the truth. That's why the left will blatantly lie an say the most absurd shit you ever heard. Their base is barely functioning retarded.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
bluto36 2 points ago +2 / -0

have an upvote handshake fren

// if you are fed tell the boys to suck it

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +1 / -1

Are you unfamiliar with how much our conspiracy clients spread lies and then use those lies to build their alternative universe?

It's one reason I do not tolerate their presence, they're generally stupid, poorly informed liars.

8
Chopblock 8 points ago +8 / -0

This weak-sauce smear attempt is what happens when you try to run a narrative engineering race but you’ve filled your stables with yes-men and herd-followers who can’t think for themselves.

The HCQ story was the perfect illustration and Veritas ran it out the gate like a thoroughbred:

Fox clearly stifled reporting about a newsworthy story where doing so could have saved hundreds or thousands of lives, in favor of pushing a (now-proven) fraudulent study that served a political narrative — and the fraudulent nature of that study would likely have been revealed if the reporting had been professionally done.

If people on this board could identify the study methodology problems and conflicts of interest, you can be sure that the doctor that Hecker wanted to follow up with could have explained it.

Not only that, but FOX then quashed Hecker’s comment about the censorship itself — a root cause of the misinformation.

That means at least TWICE Hecker identified and tried to report a key factor of the biggest story of the year, and TWICE FOX acted against ethical standards of professional journalism to silence her, directly leading to misinformation spread that caused hundreds or thousands of deaths.

5
FireannDireach 5 points ago +5 / -0

ethical standards of professional journalism

Wait. You're being serious?

3
Chopblock 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just because the consolidated conglomerates controlling 95% of media think they’re ‘too big to follow them’ doesn’t mean they don’t exist.

3
FireannDireach 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was just joking. They used to exist, but it's clear none of them have even read them these days.

2
BlitheringIdiot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, this is exactly what they did. I wonder when critical mass occurs for the populace to realize it.

2
justinjfit 2 points ago +2 / -0

she was not, she is not even a real person. That even that you speak of never happened. /s

88
JustTheNews 88 points ago +104 / -16

we saw the report with our own eyes you fat fucking neckbeard mgtow.

49
Imransgarage 49 points ago +49 / -0

"dISgruntLeD fORmER eMpLOYee!!!!!!!!!"

It was really smart of them to do it that way. I didn't see it then but they intentionally headed off the primary fake spin they use trying to discredit the info.

39
ControlledCuck 39 points ago +39 / -0

What has MGTOW to do with this? Wtf? Last thing MGTOW would promote is being a faggot neckbeard conformist cuck like this guy is.

-25
JustTheNews -25 points ago +3 / -28

lol id say liking pussy is pretty conformist

21
ControlledCuck 21 points ago +22 / -1

That's weird considering how conformists love talking about how good gay anal sex with gay anuses is these days. MGTOW doesn't mean hating pussy, you just hate the frequent emotional baggage that comes with it.

-22
JustTheNews -22 points ago +3 / -25

so women? you hate women?

16
Alarm_1 16 points ago +18 / -2

No, it's the alimony and child support I hate. Not women.

-13
JustTheNews -13 points ago +4 / -17

then dont have kids if you dont want to support them

21
Alarm_1 21 points ago +22 / -1

Not always so cut and dry. I Wanted a kid, ex agreed and said we could make it work. ex played her part, I moved her across the country to be with me, shegot knocked up (as planned) and lied to me about the whole thing before she moved to the other side of the country while she was pregnant. Found out that she had a conversation on Facebook with her cousin about wanting the picket fence, the dog and the house, but not wanting the man. Now I have a 10 year old child I barely know and a 2nd apartment payment every month.

So, I don't hate women in general, but I'll never trust enough to play within a system that benefits me not one bit again. The system isn't worth it when a woman can just up and decide to get another paycheck every month on a whim. And if I can't manage it, I go to jail. Not worth it for the paltry tax break.

So having said that, I find it's more valuable to spend my time working on my goals and trying to form whatever relationship that I can with my daughter without wasting time chasing a woman. Your response reads like "Are you depressed? Have you tried not being depressed?"

Just wanted to let you know it's not always a "just don't have kids 4head" kind of thing. 😁

1
Walleye-vision71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just the part that surrounds the vagina. The rest is great!!!

-4
Talus033 -4 points ago +4 / -8

are you calling all women "emotional baggage"? because the comment you replied to doesn't say what you seem to think it says... you seem pretty sexist to me...

11
Demonspawn 11 points ago +13 / -2

you seem pretty sexist to me...

Anyone with more than two brain cells can recognize the differences between men and women. Thereby, by calling someone "sexist" you are either announcing that you don't have two brain cells or that you are so programmed by society that whatever brain cells you do have are worthless.

2
Talus033 2 points ago +2 / -0

meh, i kind of just wanted to trigger him by saying stupid shit - but he seems like an okay person =)

my brain cells are okay, all 3 of them!

1
Walleye-vision71 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s wrong with being sexy?

-2
JustTheNews -2 points ago +4 / -6

Yes they are emotional, and they are always trying to drag a brutha down....yes, they are a burden and baggage sometimes, but who cares. Life is supposed to be challenging, do i want someone around to tell me I am right all the time, no lol thats gay...You cannot just jump into a relationship or marriage and think everything is going to be perfect lol, people disagree, woman belittle men, men dont have to because they can just crush them...so they normally just sit there silently.....am i supposed to be afraid of women because it comes with responsibility?

2
Talus033 2 points ago +3 / -1

hmm yeah i think we think kind of the same way. i dont think they are afraid of women though (well maybe some are but idk i guess all people are different) i think they just like to be single and get the benefits of living that way, like being able to keep all of the money you earn and spend the money/time on yourself and stuff. and of course rejecting stupid feminism... or whatever the hell that crap is in this day and age. but those girls that like that stuff arent normal people honestly. i think everyone that is normal (women included) hate what feminism has become.

1
Moonman_Alpha 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not "conformist," smooth brain, just the norm. Conformist is wearing a useless face diaper because tyrants told you to.

1
JustTheNews 1 point ago +1 / -0

never have nver will

28
Malthus 28 points ago +29 / -1

Where did the mgtow come from? Is there any logical connection here?

7
DaayTerkErJerbs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Their interpretation of mgtow is probably involuntarily celibate an not dudes who are just done with western women in general an is using it inaccurately to insult the guy.

-14
JustTheNews -14 points ago +8 / -22

he has the look of someone who is not capable of self reflection.

22
Malthus 22 points ago +26 / -4

It appears you do not know what mgtow means then.

Just to give the context. A mgtow is not an incel as he leaves the dating market on his own accord to pursue his happiness on his own path, while an incel has no choice in this matter(hence <IN>voluntary). The reasons for this choice can but do not have to include mysoginy. The whole movement just gets a lot of negative pr kind of like real conservatives and actually peaceful protesters...

-9
Awakened -9 points ago +10 / -19

A mgtow is an incel who tells themselves, it’s all by choice. But they’re just an incel when you meet one of these guys in real life. They’re just rationalizing and coping. Poor fuckers.

24
Snipthetipandsip 24 points ago +24 / -0

Let's see what the dating pool has to offer shall we:

Women who had a bunch of unprotected sex with "the one" while they we're in their 20s and now have 3 kids they need help raising.

Blue haired shriekers who demand you tow their shitty political lines or else "you're part of the problem".

Cheaters

I was married. It sucked. Now I'm single, do whatever the hell I want without hesitation. My money is my own. It's perfect. Why would I want to mess all that up? To avoid being called an insel? Yeah right.

10
Mamapedia 10 points ago +10 / -0

Don't forget the princesses who expect you to pay for their salon services and lululemon yoga pants.

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +3 / -1

Whatever makes you happy dude, but there are a lot more options than that.

2
Snipthetipandsip 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not a lot more. I'll agree there's good women out there, sure, but they're a minority. I'd rather take my chances doing me then have the mask fall off after a year and be stuck taking care of someone else.

2
I_Used_to_be_me 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn't know there was a word for it, but I basically chose to exit the dating scene when I was about 24. Totally stopped looking, going on dates, no hookups, etc etc, precisely because it was clear every female in my area was a whackjob and not worth the effort. Coincidentally, after close to a year of that, I met my (now) wife. Wasn't looking, didn't even consider dating her (or anyone) when we met, but it worked out perfect. Over that ~year(ish), I'd learned so much about myself, and how to be happy and successful completely on my own, so that also helped a lot. Add that with finally meeting the (seemingly) only normal woman in my area, and it was perfect. But it'd have never happened if I didn't make the decision to completely stop dating and/or hooking up/going out w/ everyone.

21
Vox_Dobad 21 points ago +21 / -0

No. A shitload of mgtow guys have been destroyed by exes through the ridiculously biased family/divorce court system, and now they've opted out of the game altogether

2
papagiorgio-g 2 points ago +2 / -0

Found the feminist.

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, 4channer.

A mgtow is an incel who tells themselves, it’s all by choice.

Is a nonsensical statement not grounded in any reality. A true MGTOW is someone who actually dated and married women. An incel typically has never even been on a date.

Incels have tried to take over MGTOW thing, but the actual MGTOW community wants nothing to do with them. MGTOW are men who got raped and pillaged in divorce court, and don't want to go down that road again, and focus on improving themselves, even still dating but not willing to marry again. Or at least that's what I recall from looking at their community on their website. I don't disagree with their choices to cut their losses and run, considering the horror stories they have of having their assets seized and being alienated from their kids by horrific ex-wives. I would never go down that road myself, but I get it.

Incels are men who have never had sex or a relationship with a woman, who claim that there's nothing they can do about it, because the world is conspiring against them to block them from having sex or relationships. Which is bullshit, of course, they're just mentally defectives who don't even try, they give up before they even start because of their mental illness.

Incels are women haters. MGTOW don't hate women, just the ones they had relationships with, who got taken to the cleaners in a divorce. There's a clear and massive divide between the two communities. To claim otherwise is either serious trolling or someone who is hopelessly naive and gullible, and most likely an "Incel" themselves.

-12
JustTheNews -12 points ago +5 / -17

maybe not, but i know what they look like lol

9
ah_hell 9 points ago +10 / -1

So what you see in the mirror then?

-6
JustTheNews -6 points ago +9 / -15

NAh, Im tall, dark, handsome going on 10 years married :) I do not want to go my own way, I enjoy having a wife and a partner and a complete family. I also enjoy having someone there to balance out my big dick energy and high levels of testosterone.

7
ah_hell 7 points ago +15 / -8

I enjoy having a wife and a partner

So you're a cuck. Big surprise.

-9
Awakened -9 points ago +4 / -13

You’re really pissing these losers off by telling them basic truths. Here is one that should help you understand this particular run of soy boys. A mgtow is an incel who tells themselves, it’s all by choice. But they’re just an incel when you meet one of these guys in real life. They’re just rationalizing and coping. Poor fuckers.

They don’t have a girlfriend because a girlfriend won’t have them. They think they are secret kings who deserve a ten, but are sitting at a four. Which is fine. Fours need love as well.

They say they hate the modern woman, but they really just hate themselves.

18
MustBeTrump 18 points ago +20 / -2

Why the fuck are you pushing feminist propaganda, attacking MGTOW? You even admit that you don't know what it means. Wtf are you doing here?

4
FireannDireach 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's trolling. Must be a slow day on 4chan.

-16
JustTheNews -16 points ago +4 / -20

im not im just wondering why you hate women lol

11
MustBeTrump 11 points ago +12 / -1

You're a real weird dude. At no point did I even suggest that I support MGTOW. I am questioning your statements. If you're going to make arrogant statements then know what the fuck you're talking about.

-9
JustTheNews -9 points ago +3 / -12

So kind of like One Direction?

6
TheWinningNeverStops 6 points ago +7 / -1

wat? lol

14
onemoretimeagain22 14 points ago +14 / -0

The communist propaganda must flow

2
Donttreadonme16 2 points ago +2 / -0

You aren't the people he's talking to, unfortunately. And those people most certainly have NOT seen the report with their own eyes. Twitter and Facebook likely made sure of that.

52
Trubs 52 points ago +52 / -0

That's a cuck's jib if I ever seen one.

13
muslimporn 13 points ago +14 / -1

This is the best comment about his appearance.

10
MICHIGANisRED 10 points ago +11 / -1

Indeed. Easy to spot by the cuck of his jib.

6
googurt 6 points ago +7 / -1

What's the name of the meme character, it's a drawn guy's face with the mouth wide open?

Edit: found it https://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1376587-soy-boy

7
Robiscore98 7 points ago +7 / -0

Soyjack?

2
googurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

holy shit it has an actual name. lol

5
Joeret 5 points ago +5 / -0

You know sometime I really feel bad for people like him.

I mean he has to live his entire life with that body, face, hair, etc. there’s no escaping it.

Imagine waking up every morning and looking in the mirror and [seeing this smile] (https://i.imgur.com/tkM7ASy.jpg) smiling back at you.

And this was taken from his Twitter profile pic which most likely means this is what he thinks is the best version of him looks like.

It’s sad really. To be rotten on the inside and then have this be your outer shell.

6
phandaal 6 points ago +6 / -0

Rotten is a good word. He looks like a rotten egg took human form.

35
BoltCarrierGroup 35 points ago +35 / -0

Justin Baragona's picture pretty much confirms that he'll be arrested for touching children within the next 3 years.

1
ThisTrainHasNoBrakes 1 point ago +1 / -0

I envy your optimism- suggesting they’ll keep arresting people foe that.

23
559throw 23 points ago +23 / -0

"Seeking publicity by promoting a false narrative produced through selective editing and misrepresentation."

Translation: "You can't do that to us! That's what we do to people!!"

1
julianleroux 1 point ago +1 / -0

^^^

23
labajada 23 points ago +23 / -0

That face when your gerbil is trying to get out but you have to take a picture.

19
SpezIsANazisCumRag 19 points ago +19 / -0

Remember not too long ago when the left actually championed whistle blowers? Well now they support the opposite. Fucking fascist scum!

3
President_Elect_Pepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

You mean like Eric Ciaramella?

19
udontneedme 19 points ago +19 / -0

Ah yes the usual " selective editing " argument lol

5
liberty4alll 5 points ago +5 / -0

They think they have a monopoly on it.

14
Herpawinski 14 points ago +14 / -0

Why do they always have that face?

2
Walleye-vision71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Soy and semen

12
Space_Force 12 points ago +12 / -0

Retracto sounds intensify.

3
htb4196 3 points ago +3 / -0

He’s comin’ at ya...

1
Reefay 1 point ago +1 / -0

The retraction alpaca

11
GoGoGadgetGringo 11 points ago +11 / -0

Isn’t all editing selective?

9
62jawbill 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why do all these leftist reporters all look exactly the same..like a hot girls shopping friend... .

8
gibesmone 8 points ago +8 / -0

I’d be scared if Okeefe fact checked me.

7
davidmode 7 points ago +7 / -0

anything regarding project veritas drops is always met with "muh deceptive editing" meanwhile the left is completely incapable of getting past some faggots tweet to realize james often releases hours of unedited recordings

6
RocketSprocket 6 points ago +6 / -0

I think labeling her a disgruntled former employee qualifies as an act of journalism. The eyes of the CEOs will pass over him without reproach.

6
Bedminster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Blue check mark soy drinking kid diddler.

6
giacomo 6 points ago +6 / -0

Looks like Justin proved her point!

5
Johnrgalt 5 points ago +5 / -0

If she was a former employee seeking a publicity stunt, then how did she manage to HOST A LIVE AIR SEGMENT TO ANNOUNCE IT ON?

PEAK CLOWN WORLD.

5
D-Dub 5 points ago +7 / -2

If they fired her for whistleblowing doesn't she have legal options to come back at them with?

5
Beat_to_Quarters 5 points ago +5 / -0

When the media selectively edits to lie, misrepresent, and promote false narratives, it's called an editorial decision, as her bosses themselves claim. When you expose them, it's just lying and disingenuous "selective editing".

5
Truglow 5 points ago +5 / -0

I smell another lawsuit.

4
ControlledCuck 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Debooooonked!"

1
loric4882 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of all the debunked, James O'Keefe is the debunkedest

4
Deportingshills21 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fox News investigated Fox News and found nothing. Move along.

4
sir_rockness 4 points ago +4 / -0

Justin with the "massive faggot" grin

4
Scumbag-reddit 4 points ago +4 / -0

sElEcTiVe EdItInG aNd MiSrEpReSeNtAtIoN

Shut the fuck up you snowflake little faggots. All you do is selective editing and cry wolf when someone ACTUALLY catches you on your bullshit

3
Olorin_the_Grey 3 points ago +3 / -0

"by promoting a false narrative produced through selective editing and misrepresentation."

gee, i wonder where she learned that from?

3
Bigblue725 3 points ago +3 / -0

I hear when she went to Project Verona’s she was in fact Very Gruntled

3
Deadpoolnormiefan271 3 points ago +3 / -0

Smell another retracto coming.

3
NotDangerousGame 3 points ago +3 / -0

She literally announced it live on air.

3
electricboogaloo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kill the machine

3
behemoth887 3 points ago +3 / -0

what a total fucking idiot. how incredibly brainless and devoid of logic do you have to be for "we fired them after they whistleblew, therefore the reason that they whistleblew was cuz we fired them" to make sense to you.

3
1776ThereIsaidIt 3 points ago +3 / -0

She wasn't a "disgruntled former employee" when she was doing remotes 2 days ago.

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

We should sticky this!!!!

2
dagoat4l 2 points ago +2 / -0

She needs to sue them. She was an employee when she interviewed. Hell even said in the news the night before this story was coming out. I want her to kick their asses

2
everythingsadream 2 points ago +2 / -0

Justin is a disgusting human.

2
Train_w_no_brakes 2 points ago +2 / -0

James does himself no favors by the way he edits his videos. He should release the entire recorded videos the insiders provide him in addition to the main video.

2
Flipakademsarepedos 2 points ago +2 / -0

That dude looks like such a FUCKING FAGGOT

2
beachbirdie 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. Fox's response looks like it came from someone of the leftist ideology.

Oh. SNAP! Fox IS with the left. Just well camouflaged snakes in the grass.

2
VoteCyborgTrump2040 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look at that guys face. What the fuck?

2
Walleye-vision71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does this guy know he’s in the dictionary next to soy face?

2
Brundlefly78 2 points ago +2 / -0

Justin Baragona 100% soy face

2
DeepWinter 2 points ago +2 / -0

God!... is it possible to contract soy-poisoning by looking at a profile picture?

2
FightTheSWAMP 2 points ago +2 / -0

Suddenly now they believe what Fox has to say? That's how we know it's a fucking lie.

2
PM_Me_Ur_Weird_Bendy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude is a real life consoomer meme guy

2
Brundlefly78 2 points ago +2 / -0

Justin Baragona = hairy Brian Stelter

2
StadiumHopper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Baragonah actually makes a serious time frame mistake that could result in her collecting damages in a wrongful termination suit. If nothing else, he proves her point that the news was being culled and often fake because he does NOT factually relay the reason she is gone. By providing time frame proof he and the station lie, she has evidence the station is untruthful and its story telling cannot be trusted. Could be damages in that if she Sue's them as they inadvertently proved her allegations against her bosses.

2
Surfsup 2 points ago +2 / -0

False narrative? It was recorded.

2
StolenElectionsKill 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol - James O'Keefe's battle-hardened attorneys are going to make this reporter very rich. Those FOX fuckers have to go down.

2
Athena86 2 points ago +2 / -0

All of a sudden Hecker is all over sites in bikinis, short shorts, halter tops, showing herself holding guns, etc. Pretty soon she’ll start selling something or asking for donations. A pretty face and cute body has men supporting and salivating over her. Nobody really knows fuck all about her. It’s fucking ridiculous.