991
()
posted ago by V2021 ago by V2021 +993 / -2
Comments (72)
sorted by:
42
scrobin 42 points ago +43 / -1

Its been less than a year. The red flag for me, was when she assumed Kirby was racially motivated. It was unprofessional, unintelligent and defamatory.

35
deleted 35 points ago +36 / -1
32
ScipioAmericanus 32 points ago +32 / -0

We should have gone with that based latina judge whose family escaped communism.

3
Independenceforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ron Paul.

Why would he nominate anybody when Ron Paul was available?

I still don't get it. DON'T YOU GUYS REALIZE HOW SHREWD AND SMART HE IS?

Dress him up like a sinister looking hollywood joker actor and he'd be the coolest fucking person alive.

Health issues? RBG's corpse was a "justice" for years.

2
Albundy25 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's who I was hoping for

8
GameOnGlobalists 8 points ago +10 / -2

She was a wolf in sheep's clothing, but I question your high horse attitude until you can prove that you vehemently opposed her.

(That's three animals in one comment, so you know it's a good one.)

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
3
realJohnGalt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gotta admit, I liked the Cuban better, but didn’t protest. So, I’mma dumbass on this one too.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
iouybiy 20 points ago +22 / -2

Tht she has adopted black kids was enough for me. Her pandering didn't surprise me.

4
Throwaway_Test 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes only weird people do that sort of thing!

3
Independenceforever 3 points ago +3 / -0

100% compromised Bush Uniparty cultist.

I WAS THE ONLY PERSON AT THE RALLY WHO WANTED A MAN INSTEAD OF A WOMAN. Ron Paul was the choice. Why'd he suddenly have a "heart attack" and not die around that time?

Ron Paul for SCOTUS is best for the country.

But "popular sovereignty" wanted a woman.

Frankly if I were a woman and being promoted solely as a woman I'd be insulted and sickened. Let me earn your respect and earn what you give me based on the fruits of my character.

17
Vermin 17 points ago +17 / -0

Anyone else remember that Quaranistoiletpaper who spammed this place up for about 3 weeks last fall over Amy Coney Barrett.
He is the one I remember distinctly.

6
motoford 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep I sure remember. Glad you brought this up. Every thread on here full of his copypasta BS supporting her. Mods really dropped the ball on that one. That was completely ridiculous.

2
Vermin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was wondering why the mods did not put a stop to that.

I admit I have gotten into a couple of their posts & trolled them since then.
:)

Never engages with me.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Vermin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It did feel sort of forced when it was being put in so many posts.

I have seen this person posting stuff since the ACB blizzard of 2020.

I would be ashamed myself if I were them.
At the very least, get a new name & a handshake icon for awhile, as penance.
:)

2
Cannot_stop_winning 2 points ago +4 / -2

Him and anaconda seem to be right on a lot of things we simply want to be right lol

2
Independenceforever 2 points ago +2 / -0

I liked anaconda until he started sucking the teat of the CIA

The CIA is EVIL. Historically evil.

And that is how quickly a person can lose credibility.

How can people not know how evil the CIA is? They called to murder Trump on live tv in 2016!

(you knew from his name he was a snake, yeah, hats off to him but now the curtain is pulled back)

17
Balzenburg 17 points ago +17 / -0

As an independent I've noticed recucklicans have a weakness for marginally attractive women if they show Some elements of conservatism.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
3
N900mixalot 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Marginally" is pushing it.

1
Independenceforever 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's almost as though some controller behind the scenes is war-gaming how to manipulate their intended murder victims.

the American people are going to learn a harsh and punishing lesson if they don't get off the fluoride and fast.

13
Rucktoe 13 points ago +15 / -2

I mean, President Trump nominated her.

This was the only flaw of President Trump. He trusted people.

24
couranto 24 points ago +26 / -2

I love Trump but he failed mightily at Human Resources. His hiring was absolutely atrocious, starting with Chris Christie as the head of transition/hiring.

10
Jabron661 10 points ago +13 / -3

Who was he supposed to hire? Many of the positions needed senate approval of some form, so if he picks a real MAGA person, and they get shot down, it looks bad on him.

And he wasn't exactly being overrun with quality people anyway, too many people who would have been good for the job just didn't feel confident working for Trump, as his time, one way or the other was limited in Washington, and if they came to work for him, that would be the end of them after he was gone.

Not that I condone that cowardice, but you know it was happening.

And one other thing, look at all the vipers and false mask wearing "conservatives" that did go to him begging for work, knowing that once they got inside the White House or in his administration, they could leak and spy and basically undermine everything he was trying to do.

I think he managed to get a lot done in spite of all that, and if he could have fully cleaned house and got good people it would have been even more.

5
Rucktoe 5 points ago +7 / -2

I somewhat understand President Trumps problem here. He was willing to give up everything in order to make America great and trusted that others would follow suit instead of looking out for their own self interest.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
3
deleted 3 points ago +6 / -3
10
Greenhills 10 points ago +10 / -0

What if the travel schedule was really about her?

8
Smurfection 8 points ago +9 / -1

On Reddit the Donald, I remember being more downvoted than every before by saying it shouldn't be her. Now, remember this pedes, next time an "unknown name" has a groundswell of people pushing that name, it's astroturf from RINOs.

IN fact, I got called a racist on Reddit the Donald because I said I do not trust women who have professional careers and load up their families with adopted black children. I don't like it because parents obligation is to their own children first. Maybe adopting one in need child after you've raised your own kids is a good thing and a truly sacrificial thing, but making your own children outnumbered in their family, and also making them the younger and weaker children, is just wrong. Especially, when the parents are working in professional jobs outside the home, this dynamic is destructive. The whole reason why I defended Rachel Dolezal's transracialism is because she was a minority race within her own family and her parents turned her family into the "black" family in a white suburb, in a white town, in a lily white state. Of course, she went trans racial because her parents made it seem like her race didn't matter. Then those entirely insensitive thoughtless parents condemned her for lying about her race when they were the ones who went black first. It's really sickening to me that her parents, who are the real racists, condemned her. They may be technically right according to 'science" that Rachel is white but aside from that one technicality, everything about that family was black. Rachel was a minority in her own family. She went to a black college. She was partly raised in Africa. She had black boyfriends and black children. She got a degree in black art. She became the president of the NAACP. yet, her parents said she's a liar because she said she was black. Her parents are a-holes and guess what....Amy Coney Barrett is doing the same thing to her own children.

7
vote_for_MAGA_2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

I hear ya. I’ll admit I was on board for about a week, until I did some research. I learned very quickly that she couldn’t be trusted and said so. I was excoriated and raked over the coals for speaking the truth. But I was right the whole time.

7
OrangeElvis 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep.

7
Staatssicherheit 7 points ago +9 / -2

Scalia wanted her. That's what mattered.

Blame the Federalist Society if you want to point fingers.

4
snuggs316 4 points ago +6 / -2

i think this might have played a large'ish role in prez maga's decision...he thought very highly of scalia, and if he believed she was "annointed" by scalia, it might have tipped the scales.

i also think prez maga's hire decisions met one of two goals: either this person is maga or needs to be exposed. otoh, a supreme is for life. that's why i believe he tried to make good decisions, there. we all adore clarence thomas, and she voted the way he did on this. i'm not willing to throw the baby out with the bathwater.

5
TrumpChampBelt 5 points ago +7 / -2

They just crammed through the person of least resistance. Anyone else wouldn't have been confirmed in time.

5
FudgyFudgeBots 5 points ago +5 / -0

Simple rules to live by...

If politicians like someone, run from them.

If government tells you something is good for you, run from it.

If govt or politicians tells you something is bad for you, embrace it.

3
ggnoreeeeeeeeeee 3 points ago +3 / -0

all 3 Trump justices are trash

3
PinochetIsMyHero 3 points ago +3 / -0

This thread is utterly retarded.

The latest Obamacare court vote was 7-2. It doesn't matter which side she was on; the outcome would have been the same either way.

3
becky21k1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kavanaugh was on the Romney short list too.

3
MAG_n_KAG 3 points ago +3 / -0

has 2 adopted black kids from Haiti

has said on record that the catholic church and in particular, the pope, who we all know is a globalist pos asshat, is the end all be all.

better option wouldve been Barbara Lagoa

2
Alcibiades1473 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shes a million times better than anyone Biden would have picked. Yeah, still disappointing though. Wish we could have just appointed gorsuch 3x

2
2scoops2genders 2 points ago +2 / -0

I called it from day one. She was an identify politics primed pick. She’s no better than kamala Harris. Amy coney rawdog. Fuck her

0
fakewhiterage 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sure you did

2
ShinAkuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

SCOTUS is dead in the water, so who gives a fuck if she's useless. Roberts can just refuse to hear cases.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
2
fakewhiterage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh fucking please. Half the idiots here screaming “I told you so” were jerking off to the thought of her

2
JackOfDiamonds 2 points ago +2 / -0

She still isn't RGB. If you're a conservative, there is no question that this swap was a massive improvement. If RGB had held on another few months we'd be looking at whatever blue-haired commie fucktard justice Biden's handlers would have pushed him to nominate. Don't let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The court is currently the most conservative it has been in decades.

1
k_the_c 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wise words form Homer Simpson: Never trust anyone.

1
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 1 point ago +1 / -0

The thing is, Democrats are still raging against her. It takes a lot of time and effort to reprogram useful idiots, and because she is a Trump appointee and filled RBG's spot they are probably always going to rage against her.

1
socrates2 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you don’t control the senate with real patriots you can’t confirm anyone that’s not a swamp creature. That’s what Trumps presidency taught me.

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

So they're saying she is a partisan political hack who puts her own political preferences ahead of the rule of law, since those are the only judges that Dems recognize as legitimate (and only if their political preferences align with the Democrats').

1
Dialectic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Listen

I apologized. Don’t hate lol. I can’t force trumps hand

0
Testosteroneape2000 0 points ago +6 / -6

All you fuckers? Yet another dumb post from someone who thinks they know it all.

4
SaddleTramp 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's safe to say 90% of you dont know what is happening around you, get used to being called out for it.

0
Testosteroneape2000 0 points ago +2 / -2

Get over yourself.

0
jiminycricket1941 0 points ago +2 / -2

Trump had a real blind spot when it came to this. Or willingly ignored concerns.

-1
Junionthepipeline -1 points ago +1 / -2

He can only put up who can get thru confirmation

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
DahnaldTrump 1 point ago +2 / -1

Winning the election is the only accomplishment you can think of? He did t destroy either of those families... none of them have been held accountable for anything. Your only 2 examples are not even examples

1
27Sandino 1 point ago +1 / -0

what doesnt make sense is for them to go after him so hard that they end up red pilling millions of people if he's controlled opposition

he gained at least 12 million votes, realistically closer to 20, and the majority of this was caused by the media/deep state

it's hard to square these two

-1
Countess1066 -1 points ago +1 / -2

Meh. I like that she reaches across the other side. I still pray for bipartisanship. Unlike the fbi shit starters trying to get us to hate everyone.

-1
Junionthepipeline -1 points ago +1 / -2

Then your retarded

2
Sparkywalnutz 2 points ago +2 / -0

"you"re"

1
Countess1066 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol. I used to have a t-shirt that said Your Retarded. It was funny because... Never mind. Fucking retard. You wouldn't get it.

-2
NoTimeToBleed -2 points ago +5 / -7

ACB voted with Clarence Thomas on this case.

Fuck off with this stupidity. You hate her cuz you ain't her.

3
N900mixalot 3 points ago +4 / -1

People don't think judges are capable of making reasoned decisions based on the law and arguments.

I was more onboard with her at first because Trump was, and I now have eyebrows half raised. Not ready to give up on her just yet but definitely only bout 50 50 right now.

2
NoTimeToBleed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I almost don't care about anything else except her being the fifth vote to end Roe v. Wade. That's why she's on the court so far as I'm concerned. The rest is just gravy.

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
-1
NoTimeToBleed -1 points ago +4 / -5

Wah wah wah. Put in bunch of conservative justices then whine that they aren't willing to federally overturn elections in five states. The problem wasn't the Supreme Court. It was in state governments where RINOs actively or passively undermined the integrity of the election then did nothing to fix it. They're still laughing at you, and you're upset at ACB. Great job.

Or, no, maybe this one justice is at fault. Yeah, maybe that's it.

The smooth brain bullshit around ACB never ends.

-2
Ruck__Feddit -2 points ago +2 / -4

Where is your hate for the one who nominated her?