Comments (114)
sorted by:
FudgyFudgeBots 87 points ago +87 / -0

Another tranlation.

We own all the property, then we own you.

If you have nowhere to live, you can be essily controlled. Its all a move towards communism.

DoesFreeSpeechExist 34 points ago +34 / -0

Elites need to start dropping like flies.

FudgyFudgeBots 26 points ago +26 / -0

We need a "Make a Wish Foundation" for terminally ill adults.

Help them fulfill their lifelong fantasy of taking out a few elites.

Ophelia 10 points ago +10 / -0

Here take my money

kt524 4 points ago +5 / -1

So we strap them into armored mech suits with life support and guns? Sounds like a good cause to me.

STONKATRUCK 7 points ago +7 / -0

You make being terminally ill sound like so much fun

Irrevincible 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just give them the prototype hospital beds from Roujin Z.

AllTheWayTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

Going to need a big fly swatter.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Durdurdurkistan 1 point ago +1 / -0

They won’t. Until one day everyone just loses it. These decisions aren’t conscious decisions. Something just snaps and people start acting.

Ghostof_PatrickHenry 8 points ago +8 / -0

Stripping Americans of the right (or tradition, if not by written decree) to own real estate is one of the critical steps to establishing a true neo-feudal civilization. They want us all to be serfs, and this is how it is done.

BigIronBigIron 5 points ago +5 / -0

a move towards communism

It's concentration of capital in fewer and fewer hands.

A glimpse of the future: the worst parts of capitalism and Communism, melded into one totalitarian package. It will be Hell.

Xanisor 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, it will be like China.

BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. That's the model. God help us.

BlaineBug 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now you understand immigration in the US, and you currently see China's mass over population, and you realize what the goal is.

Sl0re10 2 points ago +2 / -0

We were wrong about the missing millions in the USSR having died in gulags. Most died by being kicked out of their housing, fired, and their rations cards taken.

Ms_Butters 47 points ago +47 / -0

homeowners feel like renters with the taxes they have to pay or else they get their property taken away.....

sordfysh 12 points ago +12 / -0

To be fair, the federal government cannot charge property taxes, so it's your state that does that to you.

TonsOfSalt 7 points ago +7 / -0

Leftist hellholes increase taxes based on value, so you are given the perverse incentive to make your house look shitty to pay less taxes.

A major company can move into the area adding value to your home, then the leftist government taxes fixed income people right out of their own home.

TD_Covfefe_Crusader 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yep. A friend of mine was just lamenting that his neighbors listed their house for sale at a very high price. He's worried that if it sells his property taxes will increase.

sordfysh 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about Texas? Texas has high property taxes.

Sl0re10 1 point ago +1 / -0

But no income tax. Most states are one or the other. Some bad ones have both.

sordfysh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why not have neither?

TonsOfSalt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most places have varying levels of property taxes, and they are all immoral.

bobobob 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be easy for them to steal homes by jacking up property tax rates.

bahhumbugger 42 points ago +42 / -0

Literally sponsored by black rock

sordfysh 9 points ago +9 / -0

Also supported by black bloc

BeefChucker 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Hey guys how do we bring back feudalism? That was great for the nobles”

Oh_Well_ian 32 points ago +32 / -0

World Economic Forum >> Communists

Time to declare war on the WEF

Kekintosh2020 15 points ago +15 / -0

Trump should have droned Davos

Oh_Well_ian 10 points ago +10 / -0

MOAB would have been even better

Whimpy13 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rods from God.

7.62swinebuster 32 points ago +32 / -0

"Sorry, you can't rent unless you provide proof of vaccination"

DCdeplorable 21 points ago +21 / -0

Sorry we dont allow renters to own guns, for everyones safety

learn2c0de 13 points ago +13 / -0

sorry, we don't rent to white people

Wintergreen 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Sorry we have to evict you. You espoused a politically incorrect opinion at dinner last night".

"Sorry, we can no longer employ you. We found out you voted for a conservative last election. We understand you need this job to pay your perpetual, lifetime rent but you should have thought about that before you committed wrongthink".

dev01 30 points ago +30 / -0

My grandfather always said: "buy land, they don't make more of it"

Forty_Five [S] 14 points ago +14 / -0

Although my grandfather didn't use that specific phrasing, he was a self made millionaire and told me that property is the best investment you can make.

anotherthing 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your dad is Lex Luthor?

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
DeadOverRed 18 points ago +18 / -0

You know what a person with no property is called? Slave

Maga2020Maga2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

Try not paying rent 'taxes' on the property you 'own'.

No one owns a damn thing and people accept it like its normal.

MAGADUDE 9 points ago +9 / -0

My property tax is 4.5k a year. That's 375.00 a month which is 1700.00 less than the average rent in my area.

DeadOverRed 4 points ago +4 / -0

Very true

Truth_Dispenser 17 points ago +17 / -0

"Bloomberg Opinion" - Soon to become a reality. They own the banks and the currency. They're in-charge of the value of the currency and can control however they want. They're waiting for all currency to go only digital. Once that's achieved, then nobody can store currency privately. Then the immovable property ownership and seizure starts! They already own most farming lands. Residential areas are next! Watch out!

Forty_Five [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's why we need to invest heavily in lead.

Truth_Dispenser 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes. Investing in land is the right way, at the same time we also need to keep a check on those who regulate property taxes a.k.a the communists in the congress, who pass the legislation!

surfnslay 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think they intentionally typed lead instead of land and I agree with them. Funny your mind just told you land when you read that sentence

talltellmanson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does this guy Gregory Manarino?

blackswans 15 points ago +15 / -0

People need to start skipping the developer. Buy a lot, or land, and build, or have built, your own damn house.

One of the major expenses for a home is the finishings. You don't need, or even want marble countertops. You don't need, or even want hardwood floors. You don't need, or even want high end faucets. You don't need, or even want 4,000 square feet. You don't need, or even want a jacuzzi tub.

You can build a 1,800 square foot, metal frame, vinyl plank floored, 3 bedroom, two bath home, inexpensive hardware home for a third the price of a developer.

DeadOverRed 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's worst than that. You can build a poured concrete 4000 sq ft home for a third the cost of you could find enough people who knew how who weren't already working on overpriced 1%er specialties and there were no codes against it.

SBOJ_JOBS 12 points ago +12 / -0

I've built a few homes for myself. There are some real impediments to super-basic construction, so beware and do some study before you start. Such as local requirements to obtain the paperwork which allows you to actually live in your new structure.

Your county or city might require that you build according to certain codes, incorporate a certain level of insulation or windows which meet certain standards. Lots of places require a minimum square-footage and a certification that the foundations, structure, wiring, plumbing, and HVAC be inspected and meet standards. You may need to prove that your septic system will drain properly before you can connect to a water system or drill a water well. Please don't just buy some land and start construction without due diligence. There are still places where you can build and live in almost anything, but they are disappearing fast.

blackswans 7 points ago +7 / -0

You can find a competent general contractor to build your home. They are out there, but you're gonna have to be on a waiting list. Removing the developer cuts, pulling a number out of my ass, 30% of the cost of the home, and cutting the high end finishings another 30%+.

If you want to hassle with hiring the subs and dealing with code enforcement yourself, you can cut more, but a GOOD general is worth what you're paying him.

DeadOverRed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, exactly- and that's the cause of the housing shortage and the insane prices

0815 1 point ago +2 / -1

State building codes always apply no matter if enforced at the time of building or not. Some people then want to sell and it hard or next to impossible to sell a non-code compliant home to someone needing a loan. And a home cannot often not just brought up easily to code. All codes have an engineering exemption. That applies for example for concrete homes and other types of non-typical construction. The thermal requirements are prescriptive but insulation can be added on on the outside. Spend the 3-5k on an engineer is smarter than having a self-built 200k ruin. Also understand that building code is a minimum requirement and does not fit all specific circumstances and preferences. If you plan to live in your home until you no longer can't because of age, plan now to allow enough room in hallways, srairs, and bathrooms to be ADA compliant. Biggest and potentually super expensive mistake especially if you are on a fixed income when you need this. And the first address should be an architect/ engineer and not a contractor. Most people have no idea how to spot a good contractor. Just because stuff looks good doesn't mean it looks still good in 20 years. Remember: Only what is specified in writing can be demanded in court... How thick was your last car purchase contract? How thick is the contract your homebuilder brings you? The car is a tested industry product, your home is a single production custom product. Which one should have a thicker contract with specifications?

BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

But I want to start a millennial Hoovertown in the woods built with logs and old TV parts.

ippwndu 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your idea of a dream home sounds... lovely.

talltellmanson 1 point ago +1 / -0

or even want a jacuzzi tub.

Whoa hey buddy... slow down there.

gtwhizz 10 points ago +10 / -0

This is what kings and tyrants do. They will become the corporate rulers of America. You will be enslaved just like the peasants in the middle ages. This is the same old control that has been used to suppress freedom and the right to pursue happiness.

talltellmanson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly. The age of the land lord is about to return.

These feudal EU faggots who lost their control with the advent of America are taking back what isn't theirs.

China is already back to their feudal roots, EU is trying to do the same and turn America back into a colony.

BigIronBigIron 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now does the Bloomberg push to grab guns make sense?

Hedonismbot 9 points ago +9 / -0

Building equity is bad because it creates generational wealth; that's privilege.

Instead just throw your money out the window to a corporate landlord who owns an entire fiefdom.

Scumbag-reddit 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm getting hounded by calls/texts/letters to buy my house. Even offered $450k, about $100k above current value.

My response is always "nice try commies, go back to china"

Gmama2 8 points ago +8 / -0

I will start by saying lots of renters are great.

That said, they don't keep up their homes how owners do. They aren't going to spend all day Saturday mowing, trimming, weeding and planting flowers like many homeowners do, and landlords (I am one) aren't going to come do this or hire workers to do this, only to watch the weeds grow back and flowers die. Renters don't get as involved in local politics because they are generally short timers, with that mentality.

Dytopia, that's what they want.

Furthermore, for most Americans a house is their biggest asset, and a way to build wealth.

It is a lot like the push to stop people from doing contract work and to put small businesses out of business. They want an apathetic populace who don't own anything or take pride in their businesses, homes or communities.

airborne3502 8 points ago +8 / -0

Ain't gonna be no Bedford Falls to move into when they're done.

BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

Plenty of Pottersvilles though

traveler776 8 points ago +8 / -0

You will own nothing and he happy

dakin116 3 points ago +3 / -0

Checkmate bigot, reuters fact check told me that's False. They only had multiple videos going back 5 years saying this very thing but it's definitely False. Clown world

talltellmanson 8 points ago +8 / -0

You will own nothing, and you will be happy.

Forty_Five [S] 7 points ago +7 / -0

Will the elites own nothing as well I wonder?

godgoldnguns 1 point ago +1 / -0

and eat bugs

JimQPublic 8 points ago +8 / -0

The two things in this world that are truly finite are land and time. Utilize both to your advantage, pedes.

TrumpFan26 7 points ago +7 / -0

Then i'll move into the wilderness and build a shack.don't care.i'm not becoming a slave to them.i'll learn to live like Tarzan if i have to.

talltellmanson 7 points ago +7 / -0

They'll own the wilderness too.

There is nowhere to run. We have to stop this now

Bigbadchows 7 points ago +7 / -0

the let Wall Street buy our homes at 1/2% margin loans. This started with REIT's in 08. Margin loans do not have a principle payment as long as assets do not drop in value. I thought the system would crash long ago, but I did not see a world where the entire G-20 would be broke.

michelleobama22 6 points ago +6 / -0

so if everyone rents who owns the rentals?

Singingthebattlecry 2 points ago +2 / -0

The shell companies of those oligarchs that think they control the world (Davis and World Economic Forum overlords).

michelleobama22 0 points ago +1 / -1


deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
exwhyze 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fuck em. I just bought a house with land and the only fucking thing i'm ever renting again is equipment.

OperationCatSpeed 4 points ago +4 / -0

The housing bubble has entered the room

talltellmanson 5 points ago +5 / -0

Doesn't matter if it crashes anymore to them. They don't need a ROI since they purchased everything with fake printed money and will be propped up by globalist infinite financial interests.

OperationCatSpeed 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's nice. Whatever their dumb ass plan is, we the people can revoke our consent to be governed by it at any time.

talltellmanson 4 points ago +4 / -0

While I'd like to agree, history and the examples it has set tell me otherwise.

Once they're in full control, it's very difficult to take back power. Just look at China or the USSR. Nobody was capable of fighting back as there are too many mechanisms of surveillance and control.

We have a very limited time to fight this shit off. There should be a sense of urgency in all of us

OperationCatSpeed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fortunately, our founding fathers made sure not to cede all the powers into a central authority and our states still have rights.

Edit: Yes. If '22 doesn't prove out, we're fucked.

talltellmanson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Unfortunately we ceded all power to a 3rd party, the Federal Reserve in 1913 so we have bigger fish to fry once we get these corrupt Democrats and Rino's out of office.

Harsh_Truth2 4 points ago +5 / -1

Except you don’t really own that either......

blueeyephoto 3 points ago +3 / -0

question: if "renting" is the way everything should be, who are the owners who collect the rent? individuals (not in this "utopia") or large conglomerates, i.e. government, who will control another aspect of your life?

Alexius_von_Meinong 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kind of smacks of "You will own nothing and you WILL be happy"

Donaldsweiner 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember the great reset “YOU WILL OWN NOTHING AND YOU WILL LIKE IT” this is all prepping you

Barbs 3 points ago +4 / -1

Houses are still an affordable and stable investment, and as long as we have humans in this world they’ll stay that way. I’m getting so sick of narrative media, “hey guys, I’m gonna throw this totally stupid idea out there and pretend that it’s true.”

catatonic_frog 3 points ago +3 / -0

fuuuuuck that

BigE_123456 2 points ago +2 / -0

Translation - Agenda 2030

CoyoteTan 2 points ago +2 / -0

WEF is just European World Communism. WEF is the mortal enemy of man's prosperity and freedom. They are worse than the CCP.

PartisanHack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Whatever the MSM reports, do the opposite!

Tailgunnerjoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bloomberg. What do you expect?

socal_maga 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bloomberg Opinion.

Take your fucking communist opinion and shove it up Bloomberg's ass.

FromSethWithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

And live in pods.

And eat bugs.

And diddle kids, like Klauss Schwabb

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
Buck_Fiden 1 point ago +1 / -0

When they say they want "equity" this is what they mean.

Codrus 1 point ago +1 / -0

People haven’t truly owned anything in decades.

If you have to make payments on it, you don’t own it.

If you have to pay a tax otherwise it’s taken away, you don’t own it.

Take the word “owned” and remove the “n” and you get “owed” as in your in debt for the rest of your life and even after your death.. this is where we are

DeusVultIntensifies 1 point ago +1 / -0

The article is poison. The worst candy coated advice ever such as sell your house and try out other neighborhoods. Sure buddy. He doesn't mention the actual cost of renting, especially for families who need room and that when house prices rise, rent rises too.

RoosterRaiser 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have to pay rent to....Uh.... the home OWNER? Hello?

Foreign_Aid_is_Theft 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some people can get a loan for sub 3% and property usually appreciates a decent amount above that over the years (at least in good areas)

Why would a business want to buy up housing when their weighted average cost of capital or in the case of a fund projected IRR is well above 8-10% annually?

In other words, if a business wants to buy an asset from you that you can finance for cheaper than they can, then you are getting screwed.

Also, this author never saw "Batteries Not Included"

In what world do you want to live where your house is constantly being traded around? One day an "investor" decides to meet his IRR targets, he has to raise your rent by 50% or an investor buys up all the houses on the block and wants to turn it into multifamily or mixed use construction. It sounds like a fucking nightmare.

Covfefe1984 1 point ago +1 / -0

Land has always been the truest source of power, from the dawn of man to today.

grapenuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

this is the kind of stuff that caused real rebellions. Here it is again, but global now. The rest of this century is gonna get rocky.

GeorgeFentanylFloyd 1 point ago +1 / -0

“You will own nothing and be happy”

TrumpWon2020huge 1 point ago +1 / -0

So glad I decided to buy a home with land in a rural area this year

AngeredKabar 1 point ago +1 / -0

You will own nothing. And you better be happy.

Now live in ze pod and eat ze bugs.

Josh-Man 1 point ago +1 / -0

Weird, then why has my home been such a stable and affordable investment. Why has the damn thing more than doubled in value since I bought it?

Mememagic4all 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sponsored by world economic fourm

BlaineBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

Everyone is a renter, when you consider property taxes and mortgage interest.