2380
posted ago by current_horror ago by current_horror +2383 / -3

One of our local hospital systems wanted to prioritize vaccinations by race and ethnicity, but they couldn't simply say "everyone except white people". So the hospital put out a flyer naming literally every non-white racial and ethnic demo. Apparently if you favor every letter in the alphabet except Z, then you're not actually discriminating against Z.

Comments (167)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
3
Raisinade 3 points ago +3 / -0

The founding fathers of the United States were literal White nationalists (read the naturalization act of 1790 if you don't believe me), are you honestly saying that adhering to traditional American values is what marxists want? I honestly don't understand "conservatives" like you, what are you trying to conserve, the colorblind values of the marxist civil rights movement? Clinging to a previous generation of marxist lies and rejecting the new ones is hardly admirable.

2
Wexit-Delecto 2 points ago +2 / -0

Founding fathers were men, not gods. They were wrong on some things. Rule of law solves all problems, which is why the left made disproportionate representation of certain races in prison out to be systemic racism when it’s just evidence of different proclivity towards crime of certain races.

Multi ethnic society is possible. Multicultural society is not.

Note that I’m not calling for more immigration. We’re all full up across the entire west. I’m just saying all men (who are already here) are created equal and are entitled to equality before the law.

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Rule of law solves all problems

And we no longer have it; and the only way to get it back is by force. You'll "conserve" nothing in the long run and then you'll die a failure. I'll die in a hail of bullets and then you'll disown me like a coward and take two extra steps towards the trench of bodies to prove what a Gud Boi you are.

1
Wexit-Delecto 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't believe the only way to get it back is by force, but I don't discount force as an option. The SC finding "no standing" for Texas narrowed the peaceful options significantly, but they're still out there.

It sure would be nice to have a leader who defined a red line. Left to define it on our own, we'll wind up with a hodge podge of red lines and the problem you describe will materialize. Trump should absolutely describe the red lines at his rallies.