1124
THIS ⬇️ (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by I-am-Orlando ago by I-am-Orlando +1131 / -7
Comments (59)
sorted by:
59
aSavvyBoi 59 points ago +59 / -0

"According to sources" is a phrase I'm tired of hearing. "Sources" got GEOTUS impeached twice. These people better step up with their information. Unnamed sources no longer have the goodwill they used to.

9
Smooth_Kahuna 9 points ago +9 / -0

Want to scream "SHOW YOUR WORK". Any one who can't is Grifting.

2
aSavvyBoi 2 points ago +2 / -0

But... but... showing your work is wacist.

4
DuelPorpoise 4 points ago +4 / -0

Too good to be true, I’m guessing the dude has not enough to do, or is a blue who spews.

3
InterloperKO 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well my sources tell me this is bs because Joe has an entire career of never getting votes. 37 million is a still a fat ass lie

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
39
TEXinLA 39 points ago +39 / -0

TRUMP WON

BY MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS

28
DoesFreeSpeechExist 28 points ago +28 / -0

Our country was stolen from us, and demons need to die for it.

36
RyeDaD 36 points ago +36 / -0

The shutdown is the crime. We must figure that out. All the way to who called it.

11
DoesFreeSpeechExist 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pelosi.

14
JSullz59 14 points ago +14 / -0

She's as senile as Biden someone else pulling the strings.

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
10
JSullz59 10 points ago +10 / -0

Idk he's also old as fuck and so much in the public eye I feel like he's a distraction.

2
Arwyn3x 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who planned it yes, but who gave the nod - Obama, Xi - Fox News knows.

Would Fox News have given the "go code", by calling Arizona for Biden if they hadn't gotten the "go" from the horse's mouth?

Hey Paul Ryan who was it that gave you the nod?

24
ItCameTrue 24 points ago +27 / -3

This is disinformation to discredit Mike Lindell ahead of his efforts.

-23
glasses2020 -23 points ago +2 / -25

HE discredited himself.

5
gladiator70 5 points ago +5 / -0

How

-4
glasses2020 -4 points ago +1 / -5

Watch the last video he released. It's a joke. They are bullshitting us. Nothing that they presented stands up to basic scrutiny.

How did they get into every election network in order to capture network level PCAPs?

How did they break the voting machines encryption in order to identify specific remote actions on each of the systems?

How did they come up with the specific number of votes changed at each location, simply by using network traffic?

How did they get public IP information from the PCAP taken inside the network?

21
wethedownvoted 21 points ago +21 / -0

this makes a whole lot more sense than Biden/Harris lmao

19
NamendaBiden 19 points ago +20 / -1

It's seems unbelievable on its face but the more you think about it, Trump gained so many new voters and swayed so many reliable Democrat voters, as well as the absurd lack of support for Biden... This is closer to the truth than what was accepted as "official" after the "election"

3
Ponysoldierpatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

This report indicated 140 million people voted. I don’t believe that number at all. It has already been proven in Nevada that there were many votes counted which were registered to fake addresses and places where there were no dwellings. I think Trump got more votes than he was given credit for but I think the real steal came from fake ballots, software manipulation and re-running Biden ballots through the machine.

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure Trump got a massive amount of votes, but this post is pure grifter bullshit. The only people who know how many votes Trump really got aren't talking to anyone, because they are the people who planned this.

0
DuelPorpoise 0 points ago +1 / -1

Disagree, millions of votes changed across the board? Sure several million are likely swapped, but tens of millions? No way. Too big, cointel op is more likely.

13
Muzzah 13 points ago +13 / -0

We know.

11
eclectic22 11 points ago +18 / -7

This is just retarded.

6
TheMadManDidItAgain 6 points ago +7 / -1

I agree. Trump actually won all 50 states, and got 155,500,000 votes and Biden only got 600,000.

4
ObamasLooseButthole 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can’t say you’re wrong because that is completely believable when comparing Trump support VS Biden support.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
ObongoForPrison2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

Welcome to .Win.

11
M3CJC 11 points ago +16 / -5

I mean I believe trump won 100% and fraud was commuted but I don’t believe these numbers to be honest

7
LandonFire 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah house results dont lend to this theory unless they switched all the down ballet votes, but that isnt being said

8
AmazinKrackin2 8 points ago +8 / -0

What a huge failure by the Democrats. Four years of planning, 1.5 billion spent, had to release a virus to shut down the economy, and with all of that they couldn't pull it off. Trump got Reagan numbers. Dominion Voter Fraud Systems is the jewel of the Deep State and they will never give that up.

7
MsAnthropic 7 points ago +7 / -0

I’m 100% sure Trump won New York. I’d say Sleepy Joe won in DC and Trump won everywhere else.

6
ExileOnRedditStreet 6 points ago +6 / -0

I just know Trump won by alot

5
Stanwyk74 5 points ago +6 / -1

I believe he won by a lot. But proba ly still lost the new england shit states.

5
grassshrimp 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is bullshit, and we're spreading it as intended. Trump won no doubt, but posts like this make us look like fools.

5
RachetQueen2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

I know it in my bones. No freaking way did Biden garner the votes they claim. I am convinced CA went red too.

4
Eu-is-socialist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Aha i'm guessing this will go on and on until the next elections ?

4
GeoG85 4 points ago +4 / -0

How did he win New York legally?

The millions of Swamp employees voted?

3
YodaBannon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I just did a flying elbow off the couch and went right through a glass coffee table. Thanks for posting this.

3
Alcibiades1473 3 points ago +3 / -0

The election was stolen, but claiming it was 103m to 37m is hard to wrap my head around. This anecdotal, but from my middle class experience the Joe-Trump vote was split pretty evenly. I don't believe Trump won by that many votes when so many libtards infest our cities and make up a huge percentage of our population. Trump won by a lot, but 70million a lot? Better substantiate that with concrete irrefutable evidence or you just make us look stupid and get every real issue dismissed out of hand

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, i'd be more realistic with an 80-65 number for Trump. There are just too many commies and sheep out there to have only 37 mil

2
DuelPorpoise 2 points ago +2 / -0

This^! If you apply the audit findings across the board you can get these numbers, not the AstroTurf being used to discredit the real efforts.

1
farfiman 1 point ago +1 / -0

But how do we know ? Previous elections ?

1
NvJohansson 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm just guess-timating, which i'm sure is more on targer than their "official" numbers.

3
Rustybutt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Take a moment and think about the ramifications of this....the FBI, CIA, democrats aren't just going to roll over and say you got us. It's highly likely the supreme Court won't even hear any case. Where does that leave USA? Power isn't going to be ceded, you can't just let democrats walk away as if nothing happened. Large parts of the military are already compromised and will not enforce the Constitution. Msm won't report on it. The only way through this is civil war and courts hanging the traitors and treasonous assholes that implemented such a travesty against democracy, the Constitution and the will of the people

2
Shayhawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

RELEASE THE DATA OR SHUT THE FUCK UP

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

This sounds like bullshit to me. Not the part where Trump won, but the part where "machines were overwhelmed". If you write a program that will switch 30% of the votes to someone else, it Wil do it regardless of the number of votes. What is more likely is a specific number was set to switch, and that number was far too low, so they had to shut everything down.

Also, unless that guy's sources are part of the actual fraud planning, there is no way they would have this information. Only the people at the top would know how many votes were changed and none of them are going to talk.

2
HanginChad 2 points ago +2 / -0

No way did Trump win Vermont. I'd believe he won New York before I believe he won Vermont.

2
FuckMeAndMyPassword 2 points ago +7 / -5

Fuck off with this bullshit. Best case scenario Biden won NY Cal Oregon Washington Hawaii

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +10 / -0

Biden definitely won Hawaii and probably NY. I can't imagine he didn't win IL as well.

Those of us in CA question the results here. We REALLY question the results here.

I don't think my friends in OR and WA are realistic, so I'm not commenting on them. Would love to see an audit though.

But yes, let's knock it off with the 49-1 BS without proof. I'm more focused on the 270 number.

9
MICHIGANisRED 9 points ago +9 / -0

California has been rigged for decades. Soon you will see.

4
JohnCocktoastin 4 points ago +4 / -0

And Texas. He had Beto out campaigning for him. Everyone in Texas can’t wait for him to run for another office. Champing at the bit. He carried Joe across the finish line in Texas.

2
AgnesDomini 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine that there are 37 million idiots in this country...yeesh.

2
SoldierofKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump won but it wasn't 107 million and Mike Lindell is delusional. He needs to just make good pillows and donate to populists. What he's doing is discrediting us

1
Freedombunker 1 point ago +1 / -0

I believe this. Now, will anything change?

1
raggedyman74 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Trump did not win Massachusetts. As a resident of this communist state, I can verify that Trump did not win MA. Any info stating that he did is wrong.

1
zerocooltx 1 point ago +1 / -0

i've heard this repeatedly. no clue if it's true(i doubt it is) but its all going to come down to auditing the states where all the cheating happened. it likely happened in every state to varying degrees.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0