3594
Comments (93)
sorted by:
138
iirc_life 138 points ago +139 / -1

We are crippled by our need to be rational and consistent. They aren't.

53
RedditStillSucks 53 points ago +54 / -1

Comrade? Don't you remember that we were always at war with Eastasia?

17
iirc_life 17 points ago +17 / -0

Because they did not share our values, comrade.

10
MasklessMarvel 10 points ago +10 / -0

funny how dystopian novels like 1984 and Stand on Zanzibar (which is much more cogent) always have the TPTB involved in a war

and Old Joe is busting his diapered ass trying to get us into one

12
RedditStillSucks 12 points ago +12 / -0

He is already at war with the super real and totally not fake white supremacists that are everywhere causing problems!

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +5 / -1

but he is trying to stir up shit with Russia

like saying Putin is a killer and having nuclear bombers patrol off Russia's coast

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
AlphaNathan 20 points ago +20 / -0

Exactly. The left operates on feelings. Mock them into submission.

17
talltellmanson 17 points ago +17 / -0

That might work if they had any shame

3
TheWinningNeverStops 3 points ago +3 / -0

This. They are incapable of simple logic and shame. They are merely npc husks.

6
Fractional 6 points ago +6 / -0

The operates on anything and everything necessary to win. It does not matter if its ethical, logical, feasible, etc... Feels are just a means to achieve a desired reaction.

10
GeoG85 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hardly. Ever been mentally ill?

I used to have PTSD - it's a goddamn nightmare. Anything can trigger your traumatic memories, triggering amnesia.

I can easily bet that the Left's majority consists of people with PTSD. Dominated by fear? Traumatized? Using marijuana and hard drugs as life support for the pain?

Check, check, check~

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +6 / -1

what did they get PTSD from, not enough espresso in their latte?

4
tholins 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is what I wonder too. I don’t think it’s real PTSD. I see so many fuckers claiming that... not possible.

I agree with PP. I’ve had it and it is awful. Took me over a decade for the trigger reactions to fade to the point where it wasn’t a problem anymore. It’s no joke, but at the same time, you have to work your way through it.

The Left seems to frolic in their mental illness self-diagnoses like nurglings in sewage. (Sorry for the W40k reference that’s just the only metaphor I can summon)

4
Thirsty_Liberty_Tree 4 points ago +5 / -1

Their mothers and fathers giving them everything they wanted, often trying to out-do each other after relationship dissolution, and without chores, boundaries, guidance and discipline. Now they're adults and are triggered by everything as an attention-getting and want-and-desire-obtaining mechanisms... and mental health professionals catering to their whimsy and emotion for high-priced paydays.

3
ThirteenPercenter 3 points ago +3 / -0

They’ve been continually told they are under attack.

3
iirc_life 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe a portion of them are suffering from shock-like symptoms. But some of them likely know exactly what they are doing.

5
MrAnderson1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rational and consistent is why our side is growing and theirs is shrinking.

If people have a choice, they cannot stand to live under the thumb of irrationality and inconsistency and will flee it .

Bank on it.

4
gunteh 4 points ago +4 / -0

Our side grew with Trump, it did not with McCain/Romney/Bush. And now the GOPe is trying to pivot the party away from Trump's return, which is a huge mistake.

2
BigMikesSwingingCock 2 points ago +2 / -0

They can act however they want and get away with it because of Soros DAs and decades of setting up corrupt systems to protect their proletariates while persecuting actual America loving citizens.

64
deus_vult 64 points ago +64 / -0

If Hillary and gang were so sure Russians hacked the election, why did they never ask for recounts or audits that would've proven it?

39
Torrvarpen 39 points ago +39 / -0

Anything that would prove their fraud is scary to them.

48
anotherthing 48 points ago +48 / -0

That happened. Jill Stein wanted an audit because she thought Hillary won. If I remember correctly, they started but aborted it when it started to come out that Hillary lost by more than they thought. Michigan? It was one of the Northern states.

38
thisguy883 38 points ago +38 / -0

Yes, they uncovered more votes for Trump.

Once it was obvious that fraud was going on, they stopped it.

35
BidensPrisonWallet 35 points ago +35 / -0

Thats why Killary wasn't in front of the cameras every minute screeching for recounts and audits. They cheated and still lost.

14
MICHIGANisRED 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yup, yup, yup. More people need to be reminded of this. Hell, I almost forgot about it.

13
Farmerbob1 13 points ago +13 / -0

They were so sure that the Leftist hacktivists cheated the election sufficiently in 2016 to win, the fact that their fraud didn't work was 'clear' evidence that someone else hacked the election to offset their 'win.'

So they cheated even harder in 2020.

5
WhiteTrashJesus 5 points ago +6 / -1

That wasn’t their argument their argument was that russia was spreading “fake news” which made people decide not to vote for her on their own. In reality it was her own emails

5
SkippyTheSwampBeast 5 points ago +5 / -0

They said the election was 'hacked' multiple times

4
covidredpilledme 4 points ago +4 / -0

I was not into politics at that time but when I heard that on the news, I was like I want trump because at least he isn’t going to sell out the country

3
MICHIGANisRED 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think a lot of normies felt that way this time. That's why Trump won. By a lot.

-21
NC_patriot -21 points ago +8 / -29

Or the fact that she was terribly unlikable.

6
WhiteTrashJesus 6 points ago +6 / -0

The reason she is terribly unlikeable is you can tell she is involved with the things outlined in the emails and other scandals just by her mannerisms

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

because if the Russians could hack into our "secure, tamper proof elections," they would have to admit fraud in the 2020 election

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
45
Whoopies_tds 45 points ago +45 / -0

It is abundantly clear that America is not governed by elected officials but instead by deepstate power hungry traitors and their propaganda machine.

14
AlphaNathan 14 points ago +14 / -0

I've known it for a long time. Glad to see more people waking up.

3
clownworld30330 3 points ago +3 / -0

Deep state officials and (s)elected officials. The few who are elected get compromised or bought, or they are gullible af.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

we need to get back to the idea that it is governed by us

3
censored4wrongthink 3 points ago +3 / -0

we get closer and closer to the Cyberpunk 2077 timeline every day

16
Torrvarpen 16 points ago +18 / -2

Is there any way to use a no confidence motion to fire the president, like Sweden did to the socialist prime minister just hours ago. https://www.thelocal.se/20210621/sweden-stefan-lofven-loses-no-confidence-motion/?

17
tholins 17 points ago +17 / -0

No, that’s not how our system works. You can do that in a parliamentary system because the head of state isn’t elected by the people but chosen by the majority party.

12
Torrvarpen 12 points ago +12 / -0

Fair enough, but it should be added that Biden wasn't chosen by the people either.

11
thisguy883 11 points ago +11 / -0

But he was "certified" by elected officials who were "chosen" by the people.

8
whataboob 8 points ago +8 / -0

And interesting scenario is if some of the House and Senate seats are decertified and given to the rightful winner,

Then Biden wasn’t certified by a legitimate congress. Temporarily certifying fraud can’t be law. Otherwise democrats and uniparty could do this every time, despite rampant fraud — just quickly certify, and who cares about fraud? Nah.

4
Torrvarpen 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yea but the people expected him to do his job, and not act as some leftist infiltrator. It's a crime against democracy.

3
marvinthehaggler 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is exactly their legitimacy argument.

4
tholins 4 points ago +4 / -0

True. But we’re talking about the political structure, not the underhanded subversion of it.

Realistically, I don’t think any number of audits can actually dislodge him from the White House. It might cause a political crisis though.

-21
NC_patriot -21 points ago +8 / -29

I can't believe how many parties some of the European countries have. It's amazing anything gets accomplished (if it does, not really sure about that).

8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +8 / -0

how long ago did the Limeys vote for Brexit?

and they are still fighting over it

3
DeplorableCentipede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Brexit has happened, hasn’t it? Britain already fully pulled out of the EU.

0
Torrvarpen 0 points ago +3 / -3

It's a great way for everyone to get true representation, there are many cases where main stream parties simply agree on stupid decisions, while a majority of the people want something else.

In a multi party system there could be one question parties for the more important questions. Like immigration for instance. And those parties would get real influence simply because all mainstream parties has agreed to flood the country with illegals.

In the event that nothing gets done, which can happen. It's also a good thing because it means no damage will be done in case of a leftist majority. European governments are typically smaller in power than your federal government, they can only decide the fundamental rules and not control everything into the smallest detail.

Most European countries would continue to function even without a government. They just become conservative that way instead of progressive.

8
quantumwannabe 8 points ago +9 / -1

But in many European countries, you get to pick from the Communist Party, the Socialist Party, the Democratic Socialist Party, the Environmental Socialist Party, and the Neoliberal Party. That doesn’t sound better than our system.

6
Isolated_Patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

You are correct.

It's a just a choice between five flavors of Communism, with the opposition party being flavor of the week. In the US the Rinos have to at least pretend to be on the side of the people, the "conservatives" don't have that problem in places like Canada.

6
RiverFenix 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's not limited to Europe; Canada has the same

'New Democrat Party' = Union Socialists

'Green Party' = Environmental Activist Socialists

'Liberal Party' = Establishment Socialists

'Progressive Conservatives' = Establishment Socialists-lite

'People's Party' = Socialist Sounding, actually most nationalistic party

'Heritage Party' = Christian Values ONLY (they aren't willing to adopt policy outside of this and therefore are kneecapped from ever winning a single seat)..

... in the end.. EVEN IF you jumped the hoops to build a legitimate party, using SOROS 'Nationbuilder' platforms and Dominion Voting machines, you won't get more voting % than whatever the CBC was paid to report. And the other two (nationbuilder/dominion) will get the rest done up tight.

3
Torrvarpen 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yea, then there's feminists, pirates, Donald duck party, most leaning left etc etc.

But don't forget the nationalist and the conservative party, either or both exist in every European country. They typically have majority or close to majority. In the latter case all those leftist choice you've mentioned tend to attempt to work together in order to block the nationalist party from any influence.

Imagine 5 different parties with widely different opinions on everything, except flooding the country with illegals, trying to cooperate. It's doomed to fail. And that's what's happening in Sweden now, socialism is falling.

Typically there's 5-10 parties in the government who participate in votes and rule the country. But actual parties you can vote for are often over 100, there's a party for everything and as soon as people are unhappy with the mainstream parties the solution is to simply vote them away and replace them with something else.

I find it difficult to accept the US system, you're unhappy with the democrats so you vote republican, then you're unhappy with the republicans... what next? there's no alternatives, just two crappy choices.

It's also a good thing to have inflation in parties, particularly on the left side, remember what Trump said about the patriot party. Many here consider the patriot party a good idea, Trump disagrees because it would steal votes mostly from the republicans, hence leading to a stage where daemonrats always win by majority.

While in Europe, a patriot party could without trouble cooperate with conservatives, republicans, nationalists, or whoever agrees in a certain question, heck even commies could come up with a good idea every now and then. This means, it's not majority by whichever party manage to get the most electoral votes, but majority by what the representative parties people voted for actually want.

The main problem in Europe right now is all these strange alliances the left leaning pro globalist parties are creating just to stay in power at all cost so they can keep flood Europe with illegals. Luckily the people see what's going on and disapprove of that which means they'll vote nationalist or conservative next time.

3
MemeForTheWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

that is the same as us except that here one of the leftist parties is called the Republican Party

2
krzyzowiec 2 points ago +2 / -0

European governments are typically smaller in power than your federal government, they can only decide the fundamental rules and not control everything into the smallest detail.

That's actually how the US system works.

12
BurtMcGirt 12 points ago +12 / -0

MuH wHaTaBoUtIsM! Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

You are correct. Leftists have no self awareness, whatsoever. Hillary is still whining about failing in 2016, despite rigging the election. Most annoying thing is, when you bring up a valid point, like you did, commies just blindly say "whataboutism" as a shield against their hypocrisy.

10
thisisatestof2 10 points ago +11 / -1

Leftists in 2021: orange man lost, accept it you cultists.

Leftists in 2018: Hillary can still win, how dare you question it.

6
BlitheringIdiot 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know why, but the headline just had me laughing my ass off. Especially if I heard it in "gay lisp".

4
yurimodin 4 points ago +4 / -0

I always hear liberal headlines with a gay lisp.......my mind automatically does it 🤣

6
Brulz_Lulz 6 points ago +6 / -0

Imagine being so brainwashed that you actually want Hillary to be president.

4
RiverFenix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Some people 'want' to be cuckholded too

-24
NC_patriot -24 points ago +4 / -28

It WaS hEr TuRn

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

A mistake a lot of people do.

5
Nowsthetime 5 points ago +5 / -0

Great analogy. Had even forgotten about this.

4
think_for_yourselves 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's all so tiresome. You can pick almost literally any topic, and democrats will be hypocrites about it at some point.

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why it's futile to reason with them. You don't reason with commies.

4
PepeAmericusMaximus 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is a **distinct ** difference between the two however, hitlary's claim was 100% completely fabricated bullshit, Trump's claim is 100% TRUE, WITH MOUNTAINS OF EVIDENCE TO PROVE IT, unlike hildawgs.

1
MemeForTheWin 1 point ago +1 / -0

she said that there was cheating, but did she say who actually did the cheating?

4
Seruna_Kanus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Clinton never tried to audit the swing states, and the woman's March was wholy accepted.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that went out the window with "our elections are secure and there is no way to tamper with them"

if they go back and claim Hilldawg lost because of fraud, they are shooting the basis of their stolen election in the foot

3
MemeForTheWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

the article says that it would take resignations or impeachment and that the speaker would become president and could somehow nominate Hillary to be president - the last part was not clear

https://www.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-president-trump-russia-probe-lawrence-lessig-784081

2
wolfsettler 2 points ago +2 / -0

In their scenario a man won the election because a foreign power helped him by releasing information that was damning to his opponent, so much so that the information could have sent a normal person to prison for treason and conspiracy. Meanwhile we know that the Russians DIDN'T help Trump now after the Mueller report and from all the evidence that proves him and Russia innocent in this matter.

In OUR scenario a man was made president due to a bunch of people conspiring to stuff the ballot boxes and burning votes for his opponent while undermining all efforts to validate his win after finding so many inconsistencies in the system. In THIS scenario we aren't even allowed to question if they did this let alone investigate it without pushback

Either way, in BOTH scenarios the Democrats are the rats. Hillary DID lie under oath about her server, she did have dirty pay for play dealings with foreign powers, she did send classified information, she did conspire with the debate team and the DNC to get help and deny voters their vote. They did spy on Trump based on a lie. They DID misuse their powers in order to manipulate the news and information out there to hurt Trump and his presidency. They did harass conservatives. They did pull out ballots when no one was looking. They did count the same ballots multiple times. They did commit election fraud.

In the Trump Russia scenario, Trump would still have won the presidency legitimately albeit in a crooked way (if it were true). In the election fraud scenario, Biden is NOT the president at all.

2
Itateeverybody 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stop giving a shit how these animals view you.

They aren't worthy of consideration when it comes to literally anything.

1
Grady_Wilson 1 point ago +1 / -0

The DS was never able to fabricate the evidence they needed to say that Russia helped Trump get elected.

It wasn't for a lack of trying, though.

1
jsphere256 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well you see, it was her turn.