3101
Comments (181)
sorted by:
187
ShrikeDeCil 187 points ago +192 / -5

I've been saying this for awhile - it only works where you know they're going to follow their stupid rules and you haven't been "outed" as an obvious R. You have to at least be able to say it with a straight face.

  1. If gender is a choice, the choice to make is "female".

  2. "Well, why do you dress like a man" -> "Crossdressing is a choice, too. I don't have to dress like my gender, you bigot!"

  3. "But you hit on my sister!" -> "That's because she's hot. I guess I'm a lesbian."

  4. "Hormones! Snipping! Not serious!" -> "My religion prevents deliberate body modification, GFY."

  5. "Aha! Religious zealot! I'll get you for that!" -> "If you want to attempt to kick me based on religion, you're going to discover that Islam is amazingly protected!"

  6. "But Islam doesn't say anything like that!" -> "Allawi Islam is a small secretive sect ... to the point of having entire Holy Books that are secret. My splinter sect celebrates Christmas and Easter! No, I won't explain what "Chopper Day" is all about."

93
logan34 93 points ago +100 / -7

Or how about not going through all these mental gymnastics and tell these degenerate commies to fuck off?

74
Uh-hickabuh 74 points ago +77 / -3

But then they would be the fired ones and the moron that actually believes all that shit would be whistlin while she works. This is a creative solution. Wolf in sheep's clothing sorta deal. I get what you saying too. By doing this you play into the bull shit woke hr power structure.

53
InterestingIke 53 points ago +54 / -1

They used our systems against us. We must use theirs against them and more aggressively. It’s literally how we got to this point

21
OriginalDankStar 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is de wae. My body my choice. Me too. I believe her. My criticism of the CCP is not encouraging hate crimes against Asians it’s about preventing them. I feel like. Not even mockingly necessarily if you are able.

26
10122046 26 points ago +27 / -1

It’s simply turning their crap back onto them. I’m currently fighting masks at my boe from the point of failing to mandate a hazardous medical disposal system. I contacted the count health department and the boe liaison to my town manager.

Sent in the University of Florida study and spoke up as an outraged community member Without school aged children. I complained of the presence of masks in the community and the potential for an outbreak of said diseases in my community promulgated at their failure to incorporate a hazardous waste disposal system.

6
SPEDMan64 6 points ago +6 / -0

Go Gators!

1
TrumpTrainForever 1 point ago +2 / -1

How about we all do the right thing and put a fucking bullet in your local commie?

10
ProPatria 10 points ago +10 / -0

Have you SEEN the price of ammo lately?

2
TrumpTrainForever 2 points ago +2 / -0

True, rope works just as well

2
bigly4trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm still buying it at the insane markups, because I wholly believe the Biden admin will attempt backdoor gun control by squeezing ammo manufacturers. Obama's EPA did this exact thing, hold them to impossible pollution/emissions requirements and shut them down for non-compliace.

22
ShrikeDeCil 22 points ago +24 / -2

Because this method allows me to say "Go fuck yourself" repeatedly and be completely in the right according to their own rules.

They hate this absolutely to death. You can see far more smoke between their ears than the direct method.

6
RachetQueen2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

Malicious compliance. It will make them seethe more. The more they seethe, they will start to do stupid childish shit and then you got them.

3
bigly4trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's how I got through the COVID bullshit at work with my sanity intact. I "followed the rules" but made every maskfag's life miserable. We have an anonymous "safety violation" reporting system. I would report lefties for mundane stuff like not "social distancing" if I saw them walking side-by-side in a hallway. The seething was incredible.

5
Jaqen 5 points ago +5 / -0

I like the cut of your jib.

2
2020Gop 2 points ago +2 / -0

My people ❤

1
TheWinningNeverStops 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not happening unless it's by force.

24
MarcusAurelius 24 points ago +25 / -1

Just say that you are genderfluid or pansexual. If anyone asks, just say that you are glad that you finally can relax a little without having to feel that society forces you into an uncomfortable box, but you will continue to dress/etc based on your feelings at this time, and you can be a bit of a creature of habit.

Once you get started, let the doublethink flow.

Why yes, I read up on this stuff and CRT BS. Listened to Bin Laden videos and read Marx too. Know your enemy.

5
Yaztaz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Identify as an MAGAsexual, true and still a protected class

4
DJT_JR6544 4 points ago +5 / -1

Lol aaand now we all get free chopper rides

11
Redditcanblowme 11 points ago +11 / -0

Chopper Day observance

"Get to the Choppa!!!"

"My girlfriend has a big pussy."

All: "My girlfriend has a big pussy."

"Why did you say that twice?'

All: "I didn't."

2
g-money1 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was the height of Shane Black's career. He got pretty gay after that.

8
nakedjay 8 points ago +8 / -0

This brought me so much joy.

7
hillaryforprison 7 points ago +8 / -1

If they accuse you of anything in the leftist religion if they talk long enough they will use a gender pronoun and just stop them there and say how dare they assume your gender and discriminate against you.

10
NotTakingDownMyFlag 10 points ago +10 / -0

"how dare you use your privilege to assume my gender and race!"

44
Jestheter 44 points ago +56 / -12

/r/totallyhappened.

59
thelastlast 59 points ago +59 / -0

i've done about 9 things like this since 2016. so i know it's plausible.

33
Jabron661 33 points ago +36 / -3

Couple of things about this.

I agree, I doubt these events transpired as put forth, if at all.

And second, As fun and satisfying as it might sound to do this kind of shit. ultimately you are still playing their game, and following their rules, and giving their bullshit validation.

It's like getting a fake vaccine ID to slip past the stasi guard at the grocery store or to see a sportsball game. HA HA wow you sure pulled a fast one on them, you abide by their commie rules, you really showed them.

Fight for your rights or forfeit them, forever.

20
Moonman_Alpha 20 points ago +23 / -3

Ok then. You keep complaining and losing then while the rest of us actually do something about lefist lunacy.

7
Jabron661 7 points ago +12 / -5

How is complaining to HR about pronouns and using Vax passports doing something against leftist lunacy?

Sounds like you are being a good boy and not making any waves at all.

You seem to think pranks and tricks are winning the battle? You and "the rest of us" need to grow a fucking spine and really do something to fight back.

Say they are wrong to their face for starters, don't hide behind their tactics.

15
Nikola_S1 15 points ago +16 / -1

You are fighting a total war, so, fight it. If you have a chance to do something like this, do it. If you have a chance to tell a leftist this is idiotic, do it.

3
DoesItWorkAlready 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is complaining to HR about pronouns

It wasn't the complaining that made me laugh. It was getting the Karen fired

2
Testamernt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Getting these leftist assholes fired it always a good thing.

1
hey_spike 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sometimes we have to enlist unsavory elements in our battles.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

You haven't done a damn thing but play their game.

19
ThoughtExperiment 19 points ago +20 / -1

I disagree. When you are obviously manipulating wokeness to your own ends, you are shoving the absurdity of the system right in their stupid faces. The people who push for woke shit do so because they have the absolute conviction that they aren't bigots. So when they themselves are denounced as bigots by the very bigots they seek to denounce, they are forced into a position of complete cognitive dissonance.

They must explain to themselves how woke witch hunts could possibly be a good thing if they, paragons of tolerance, are found by those very methods to be intolerant bigots, deserving of being deprived of a livelihood. I think that this will ultimately be the most effective tool for dismantling the excesses of woke culture.

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth!

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yer nuts.

2
ThoughtExperiment 2 points ago +2 / -0

no u

1
Testamernt 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think you underestimate the ability of the human mind to allow conflicting beliefs to mesh together and become the foundation for someone's principles and perspectives that they operate from.

Also, I might add, the cognitive dissonance developed by most of these hypocrites can be quite unbreakable.

I can see where you might be able to reach the ones that are still capable of following thoughts and ideas to their logical conclusions, but the hardcore lefties can't be reasoned with. They will immediately start ignoring anything you have to say if they are passives and vehemently argue until they are out of breath if they are aggressive.

I had a dipshit just yesterday refuse to admit that if a man's sperm is used to impregnate a woman then by definition, that man is the father. The stupid fuck called me a troll for stating a fact. He kept going on about how a sperm donor isn't necessarily a father. He gave an emotional response to a factual statement.

2
Jabron661 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the point most people have not yet fully realized. Well said.

The hardcore woke leftist does not care what you say, they have tagged you as a sub human already. No amount of rational discussion is going to change their mind at this point.

They have written Trump supporters off of being members of society, now they only seek to crush us and eventually eradicate us, as they like to put, by any means necessary.

1
ThoughtExperiment 1 point ago +1 / -0

To be fair, that's a pretty reductionist view of fatherhood you've got there. your view excludes adoptive fathers, which is pretty silly.

1
Testamernt 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it's the technical/scientific definition of fatherhood. Even if you adopt a child you are not by the technical/scientific definition the father of that child as in, you did not father that child. That child does not carry your blood.

When we attach emotion to the term "father" then that's when you get to the other accepted definition of the word that you are alluding to. It's not silly. It's the biological definition of the word.

An adoptive father can only ever be just that. The child may form a bond with their adoptive father and choose to see them as if they were their biological father, but at the end of the day, that's still just an emotional response. The adoptive father is still just that, their adoptive father because it was not his sperm that fertilized that egg that led to the birth of that child that he adopted.

I understand that the bond between the adoptive father and child can be every bit as strong as that of a biological father and child. That does not change the fact that the child is not the biological offspring of that man. I'm not saying there is anything wrong what that. All I am saying is that technically, just because a man raised a kid and was their "father" doesn't mean that he is actually their father.

What's silly is that this scientific fact is hard for some people to grasp. It's like some people can't quit letting their emotional attachment to the word "father" allow them to understand that the factual definition of the word will always be more correct than the emotional definition of it.

1
ThoughtExperiment 1 point ago +1 / -0

All you've demonstrated is that we need a less emotionally loaded word to refer to a sperm-provider. It's an insult to fathers to refer to sperm donors as "fathers."

1
DeplorableCentipede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Also, all your coworkers are going to think you’re actually a tranny and the based ones will avoid you like the plague.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

This.


That'll be the day when I put pronouns next to my name. If they asked, I'd probably look at them as if they had three heads, and say I'm a woman, what do you think they are?


One of my biggest beefs is how these mentally ill "confused" people want us to pretend, as they do. So I'm not about to do it and sound as crazy as they do.

13
deleted 13 points ago +13 / -0
2
Jestheter 2 points ago +4 / -2

it is.

5
Moonman_Alpha 5 points ago +8 / -3

Yup, fake. However, this IS how you bring down the left most effectively (other than.. you know). Use the left's own bullshit against them every chance you get.

-15
Jestheter -15 points ago +4 / -19

CaNcEL CuLTuRe iS BaD

then uses it.

18
BeefyBelisarius 18 points ago +19 / -1

If your enemy is using a dangerous weapon against you and you refuse to respond in kind, who do you think will win?

-18
Jestheter -18 points ago +2 / -20

You are a democrat basically..

9
TheDTOMDon 9 points ago +9 / -0

Nah, new rules. We fight to win.

When a group of bullies set upon you in school, did to take the high ground and let them pummel you? Or did you go for the eyes and balls to give them something to remember you by?

You’re only here because your forefathers fought to win. If you fail to do so you’ll be the first in a line going back hundreds of thousands of years to do the same.

-3
Jestheter -3 points ago +1 / -4

hi fbi

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ha ha no, my political ideas would horrify most democrats. Probably most republicans too, bunch of weak useless cucks.

3
67Vert 3 points ago +4 / -1

This particular example might be fake. We’ll never know. But people actually do stand up to bullshit in real life and don’t share it on social media. For every post like this you see there’s thousands more real life occurrences.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Acting like you're mentally ill and adopting their Newspeak is "standing up to bullshit?" Clearly, we all have our standards.

2
Testamernt 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, it's quite effective and hilarious trolling though which helps keep the morale high. You never know, people that are anti-gun all their lives can quite suddenly and completely change their minds on the subject right after they get mugged. Maybe a miracle could happen and one of these idiots can learn that cancel culture just might not be all that it's cracked up to be.

32
shade1k 32 points ago +32 / -0

"Malicious compliance" can be effective but it depends a lot on the makeup of your company, as well as how well you were able to keep politics out of your own work life until it was forced on you.

If woke policy changes is being driven by Karens who aren't in HR, then I almost guarantee your HR people either hate them or are ambivalent. We've all known someone who can be such an ass that you want to disagree with them just because shut up Karen.

No matter how much HR may have been "yasss queening" along with the woke policy bosses, if you can start the hostile workplace paperwork rolling without having given them a reason to suspect malicious compliance, they will feed Karen into the woodchipper without a moment's hesitation.

It's a stupid game but if you're forced to play, play to win.

6
Mathelm 6 points ago +6 / -0

Legit, where I work the people and bosses are left/centerist/don't care.
We had a young woman Join in November, In early Feb wanted to introduce an EDI bullshit, the C-Level nodded and agreed.
But the Bitch was gone by March.
Shows how much they really believe it.
Secret is to not work for too large a company.
Keep it under 150 people and likely to be an okay company.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Testamernt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Did the policies stay after she left or are you implying that everyone worked together to get her ass fired?

1
Mathelm 1 point ago +1 / -0

They weren't implemented.
Upper management is faux-left.
Not necessarily politically "conservative", but def, professionally conservative.
As far as I know everyone in the office is married and having kids or in a long term relationship, There are no known homos.

29
anon09 29 points ago +29 / -0

my pronouns are ceo/cfo

6
t-ara-fan 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hee-Haw.

3
nerd_helmet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Literally laughed out loud in front of everyone at the bar.

2
Madman2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

My pronouns are FAFO/MOAB.

1
DoesItWorkAlready 1 point ago +1 / -0

My pronouns are was/were, for the 42% suicide rate of the mentally ill being lauded by politcally correct.

24
NorseTrades 24 points ago +25 / -1

"So what have YOU been doing to make this world a better place"

I have been getting banned to oblivion by simply speaking my mind, a value once cherished in this country, now trashed.

Nextdoor is where the action is at. Of course I have been banned from twatter and also Nextdoor, but the latter let me back on after suspension. They removed my DJT profile pic and I am in a 90 pct red county!

My smartass, once no longer suspended, made a lost and found post for my profile pic. I will not seep into the abyss.

10
TheThreeSeashells 10 points ago +10 / -0

After I was kicked off, Nextdoor wanted me to check some box promising I would play nice in order to let me back on. Did they not do that for you? My box remains unchecked. I was pretty much done with it anyway, so my posts were begging me to get kicked off. The site is just a bunch of bitchy Karens who are so annoying their pets don't even want to be around them, as evidenced by the overwhelming amount of "My dog/cat ran away...please help" posts.

After Twatter kicked one of my accounts off, I didn't even bother going back with the others. That shit show is a complete waste of time.

3
NorseTrades 3 points ago +4 / -1

They totally did! My profile pic was deleted (DJT twatter pic) and I checked their box and continued to post today, first day out of the gulags. I posted in "Lost and found" about my profile pic. You have to be a smartass to trigger someone seeing the hypocrisy, which I am SURE you did if you were kicked off!

I've been kicked off twitter at least 6 times and I can't get back on no matter what now. I hope Nextdoor does the same, lol.

2
julianReyes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nextdoor is where the action is at.

"Telegram is where the action is at." gets spied on by FBI

How about don't trust corporations, set up your own social media servers.

5
NorseTrades 5 points ago +5 / -0

FUCK THE FBI

19
SpicyAmerican 19 points ago +19 / -0

We have this woke BS at my place too.

Meet w the top diversity officer. I explained that my background is in philosophy, and ethics falls in that field. I further explained that some people are hesitant to buy in, because they don't know what the goals or outcomes will be to the whole woke BS program. I further explained the hazard of 'just doing things because they are the right thing to do.' This type of ethical justification is called deontological, where you do things regardless of outcomes.

I further explained that most people saw a lot of wisdom in MLK saying that people should be judged by content of character, no color of skin, so most people are pretty baffled that we would go against MLK on something this important.

One man's story...

9
slimcoat 9 points ago +9 / -0

How did that conversation turn out?

8
NoCensorshipzpleez 8 points ago +8 / -0

He's on a list now. I'm here to watch what he posts

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds too rational. You have to keep it simple, stupid, and emotionally charged or they tune out right away.

2
Julia_J 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hello, fellow Pole!

1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cześć, jak się masz? :)

17
Buck_Fiden 17 points ago +17 / -0

My pronouns are kangz/she/it.

16
Rerecursive 16 points ago +16 / -0

they/them is a great troll because it is almost impossible to use in everyday discourse. Using a plural pronoun to refer to an individual is some Star Trek weird shit and few can manage to do it correctly.

2
Littleirishmaid 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve used it when I was unsure. It can be used easily when referring to someone, although it is as if you are pretending they are ecpven in the same room.

10
Lordahdaring 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sun Tzu's corpse's perpetual spinning was halted momentarily by a boner from this.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
9
defiant_liberty 9 points ago +9 / -0

They still won, because now weaponizing pronouns against people who don't bend the knee is legitimized.

It would really be better if you sued them for trying to impose their religion on you.

3
potato4dawin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or get a good number of people fired then come out and say they were never your pronouns and that HR fired them for nothing by imposing shitty rules which are ripe for exploitation by anyone who wants to be an asshole and that everyone should shove this pronoun shit up their ass including HR if they don't want this to continue. Then tell them you know several people, both who intended to apply to work there and who already work there that you've convinced to do the exact same thing if they fire you and keep these shitty rules, and that if they try to fire them, they may very well just end up firing the actual lunatics who believe this shit. Either way, you've won.

1
Julia_J 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly!! 💯

8
drumitar 8 points ago +9 / -1

If everyone did this we would.be back to normal in a few days.

7
BS2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

i guess any approach to stop stupidity is good

6
Ep1ctetus 6 points ago +6 / -0

This won’t work. Momentary domination, especially using their rules against them, simply reinforces their rules. It’s not a good long term strategy. Now this dude is stuck having to say zi/zer or whatever.

Just hold firm to the truth. Don’t play their game. If they fire you, cool. Now you can she for wrongful termination.

You can resolve to live your life with integrity. Let your credo be this: Let the lie come into the world, let it even triumph. But not through me. — Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

6
thelastlast 6 points ago +7 / -1

This is the way.

5
KeeptheChief 5 points ago +5 / -0

By playing the game you're tacitly accepting their rules, this doesn't help anyone.

5
TeeTee2020 5 points ago +6 / -1

Excellent work! It's so fulfilling to watch those people eat their own shit!

4
TwelveMoreYears 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not living my life around pronoun bullshit, that's for sure.

4
Saltyminer11 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wonder what would happen if you were to show up to work in a hideous dress and heels and makeup for a super big meeting on a day when the bosses boss was there. And dare them to say a word about it. Then come in the next day wearing kakis and a shirt and tie like always. Just to see what they would do. Fuck these people.

4
PodunkTexas 4 points ago +4 / -0

"I find asking about my pronouns offensive."

4
NoCensorshipzpleez 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm seriously considering putting Gendervauge. Anyone who asks me what it means has already violated my desire to keep it vague

3
Dieselslacker 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is gooood, you could melt a few brains with that.

3
NoCensorshipzpleez 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a plot point in a satirical novel I'm writing. No stealzies

3
NoCensorshipzpleez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thy/Thine/that/ye would be fun. Watch them all fuck that up looking for he and she versions in old English.(hint : it's still he/she)

3
ProPatria 3 points ago +3 / -0

My company has annual "anonymous" surveys about company culture and workplace conditions. Few people believe they're truly anonymous, so most pull their punches in criticizing leadership, but at the end of each one are the demographics questions (age, race, veteran-status, sexual orientation, etc).

For the past five years I've been identifying as an African-American Female Lesbian, just so my criticism of leadership can't be attacked, and the company feels those demographics are "well represented." So that maybe, just maybe, when we make hiring decisions actual skill will outpace the need to fill those "under-represented" quotas.

And if they ask me why I answered their "anonymous" survey with those demographics, then they expose they're not really anonymous and my answer will be to file "hostile workplace" paperwork, "because that's how I identify."

3
slowmotrin 3 points ago +3 / -0

If this is real then great, unfortunately most 4chan posts just seem to be embellished stories of what people wish they would have done or what they would do if they had the chance, but if this is real then it just demonstrates how badly the idea of subjectivism / relativism fails on a practical level. You don't have to prove anything to anybody logically, everything falls apart when it comes to social interactions.

3
BlueEyesWhiteMullet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dude/bruh are the best I've heard/seen. Kek

3
IWanttotalknow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Works great when use an "ally"s pronounces against them on Social Media.

Just every time you refer to them, use their pronouns lol.

"He/him is angry because he/him did something stupid, and he/him doesn't like when people point out he/him's stupidity." etc

Any time you'd use he/him/his etc in a sentence, use the full pronouns.

3
bannedninjabit 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would put pronouns NA / NA

3
NoCensorshipzpleez 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep.. please refer to me using my full name only

3
poconopede 3 points ago +3 / -0

so they do this to themselves regardless. it can be further agitate like so. truly the best timeline.

4
TheThreeSeashells 4 points ago +4 / -0

It reminds me of the cartoon where Sylvester the Cat keeps stepping on the rakes and getting hit in the face. In this scenario, the Karens are Sylvester AND also put the rakes there.

2
hey_spike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dumb, doesn't get the hint after 2nd warning from HR. She probably thought she could beat the system.

2
LostSailor 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think I work at this company. Corporate is in Missouri? 😂

2
TownHallBall 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS IS THE WAY

2
Dieselslacker 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm going to use smurfy and smurfariffic as my pronouns.

2
raananh 2 points ago +2 / -0

I work in IT and was told I can't use the ancient IT terms of "white list" and "master / slave".

Next thing is astronomy: can't use the term Black Hole.

2
Rubicante 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, well, well. If it isn't fhe result of my own actions.

2
WeaponizedSmirk 2 points ago +3 / -1

And then everyone clapped. Come on, this is hearsay nonsense from some random anon with zero evidence to corraborate it why are you acting like this is real?

1
MySidesGoUp 1 point ago +1 / -0

More bitches should be home taking care of the kids they say they take care of. The world would be a better place...

1
linereddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

My pronouns are "Massah" and "Hissef"

1
linereddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Boss man" is also acceptable.

1
gothicreader 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would have added “It”.

1
Gadsden 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now this person can't fight the actual system that they put in place, though.

Used the system against the person that made, but must obey the system now that they've embraced it.

Not really a great trade-off, in my opinion.

1
SquiggyMcPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Eh I've seen variations of this over the years for various crap companies pull to indoctrinate the workers. Most likely didn't happen because HR would be filled with crazy leftists too since thats one of the first places they take over in a company.

1
Cavalier21x 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am steeling this from somewhere else, but my favorite so far is if you are asked for your pronouns, use "he/haw"

1
NoYesYesNo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Liberals are beyond the mental illness stage, but do they actually have a brain?

1
Alias117 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is a question of finding a way to turn the tables on them look at the so called stars of all this metoo and cancel culture and how people are turning it on them, keep up the great job make them regret ever starting up with this bs.

1
dorsalmorsel 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm going to ask to be referred to as honk/honk

1
SuperSilly 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why aren't "They/Them" appropriate pronouns? Why is it considered mocking? Do these people insist on being corralled into only 2 genders? "They/Them" should be perfectly acceptable. That hilarious character "Pat" from back when SNL was funny is a great example of a "they/them".

1
g-money1 1 point ago +1 / -0

"English language pronouns"

"Normal pronouns"

1
reagan2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

I choose to defer the choice of my pronouns to others.

1
PermaHandshake 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one would complain about "they/them" because that's a legitimate pronoun by the pronoun fags.

1
TGNX 1 point ago +1 / -0

Methinks she hath fucked around and foundeth out.

1
Eu-is-socialist 1 point ago +1 / -0

=)) Nice.