Comments (15)
sorted by:
7
Thunderbolt45 7 points ago +7 / -0

On one hand, this doesn't surprise me one bit (if it's true) because of the way he and Fox became turncoats on Nov. 3rd.

On the other hand, this seems like an attack of an adversary who has been going strong against the MSM narrative. Otherwise, why burn such a great source?

3
swutalk 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeppers!

5
PotatoJoe 5 points ago +6 / -1

"according to the NY Times. Do you think we are retarded? Because it seems like you think we are retarded

5
paupertoapawn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Huffington post is my favorite news source. Very trustworthy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
leet23 3 points ago +4 / -1

Let's see how he responds tonight, this is most likely some made up bollocks to try and discredit the FBI 1/6 story

3
GrandmaHelmet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Considering the source, I will hold my opinion.

3
yellowandrose 3 points ago +3 / -0

he's a piece of shit

3
comakevin76 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yahoo and CNN as sources? OK, I am Elvis. Trust me on this.

2
DrGreygoose 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm Janis Joplin so there's that

2
Znut55 2 points ago +2 / -0

Huff Post and Yahoo News...both such reliable sources. Sounds like Tucker is over the target and their job is to trash and discredit him at all costs.

2
regenerondon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just like they got the info on his vax status

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
webthing 1 point ago +2 / -1

Also January 6th was an insurrection.

1
Ragingtrumper69 1 point ago +2 / -1

So the jist of this is that Tucker openly shares information with other reporters even if they are liberals in exchange for information?

I'm not getting the controversy here. Seems like all reporters should share info to get it out to the public one way or another.