2666
Comments (66)
sorted by:
83
iIndianaJones 83 points ago +83 / -0

Frightening that a vote like this, in America, would even have 29 dissenters.

51
Fuck_The_NWO 51 points ago +51 / -0

The fraud is that deep.

31
Pinochet_Was_Right 31 points ago +31 / -0

I've never heard a reasonable argument against signature verification or voter ID that didn't involve non-sensical racist excuses

13
AOCDickPics 13 points ago +13 / -0

I wouldn't even have a problem with voter ID's being free. It is in some states already.

Thing is they'd still bitch. Ummm the lines are too long in black neighborhoods, or something. They'd find a new goalpost.

7
Pinochet_Was_Right 7 points ago +7 / -0

But I just don't understand how their own lemmings don't question the narrative. I try to be critical and I just don't see -- even from their perspective -- how that makes any sense without being a racist asshole.

2
swift_water 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're demon possessed.

2
thekindlyman555 2 points ago +2 / -0

"they don't know where the DMV is!"

2
BigBadJim 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is total horseshit, as well as racist.

10
karn 10 points ago +10 / -0

If anyone is too stupid to obtain an ID, they shouldn't be voting.

In those cases, some other person in their household is voting for them, anyway.

9
NotAHandshake 9 points ago +9 / -0

it's racist and unreasonable to expect everyone to get ID, yet everyone manages to get cell phones, utilities, EBT, etc. just fine.

2
SquiggyMcPepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

What they do is take a handful of fringe examples and then paint it as representative of the whole. It requires active shutting down of the critical thinking process to accept but decades of public school indoctrination has more than accomplished that.

11
karn 11 points ago +11 / -0

At least half of those 29 are CIA assets.

6
Barthaneous 6 points ago +6 / -0

Off with their heads!!! Is the only chant we aught to be saying

1
murph1953 1 point ago +1 / -0

what do you do with the heads?

1
BigBadJim 1 point ago +1 / -0

Send them down to Brazil so the cannibals can play soccer with them.

1
Barthaneous 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hang them on spikes in front of the white house to teach all Politicians and foreign Terrorists, we play no more games.

3
Spicy_maymay 3 points ago +3 / -0

How are they supposed to get re elected otherwise?

41
DenturesNancy 41 points ago +41 / -0

29 don't like to verify signatures. Hmm. What would happen if the republicans decide to rig the elections, stuff the ballot boxes and not check signatures?

21
Fuck_The_NWO 21 points ago +21 / -0

Remove the fraud methods and those 29 probably dwindle down to like 10 or so.

11
Pinochet_Was_Right 11 points ago +11 / -0

I'm excited to see what elections look like with these measures in place. Once overwhelming blue counties turn red? How did that happen?!

7
karn 7 points ago +7 / -0

I fear that instead they will just cheat in different ways.

IMHO there are no blue counties. Not even in Oregon or California.

Just places with more cheating.

4
V2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

They will. Democrats will reviewing the signatures of have the final say.

8
Snooptwo 8 points ago +8 / -0

I actually fully support doing whatever it takes to win, including cheating in elections. If they don’t care, why should we?

2
DenturesNancy 2 points ago +2 / -0

That is one thing the Right is not equiped to do. We should beat them at their own games. If they cheat, we cheat x4. If they come up with CRT, we come up with an even more outlandish theory. They pack the courts, we superpack the courts. Keep beating them until they give up.

2
karn 2 points ago +2 / -0

We really do have to take the gloves off and stop being "good" when we are losing to "evil" that doesn't care about being "good"

1
swift_water 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're demon possessed. They won't relent, they have no where to go but hell.

1
wuch 1 point ago +1 / -0

That would get FBI interested

0
deleted 0 points ago +4 / -4
19
rektsauce 19 points ago +20 / -1

Doesn't really matter because the big cities just ignore it.

11
duckduck 11 points ago +11 / -0

These laws mean nothing if they are not enforced. There needs to be jail time for people who count the votes without verifying the signatures.

11
MrGone 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hey Arizona! You got 29 problems

4
VexusMinister 4 points ago +5 / -1

And all of them are bitches.

10
JoesMole 10 points ago +10 / -0

29 faggots need to be removed

4
blitzkrieg 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the answer.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
CovfefeVideo 6 points ago +6 / -0

They need to specify a required accuracy tolerance, or signature matching means nothing.

2
TravlingThr0ugh [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably means matching the signature on the ballot to the one on the voter registration to where it was at before COVID steal election change.

1
Bilabrin 1 point ago +1 / -0

It means nothing either way at this point. The law will not be upheld and only republicans face legal consequenses. Tyranny won.

3
AmericaFloats 3 points ago +3 / -0

Find the 29 and ROOT THEM OUT.

3
KungPaoMcChicken 3 points ago +3 / -0

This election has done wonders for election integrity. GOP will pass so many bills under protecting future elections. Bills they would never have gotten passed in the past.

Democrats going to lose so many voters. In the future the GOP will split into two parties and end up being the two party system, whilst the Democrats will end up being the fringe city only party.

1
HighVoltage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not likely

3
CharcoalWhite 3 points ago +3 / -0

So damn near half of them are corrupt af and still want to push for fraudulent elections.. And we wonder how things like the 2020 election could happen

2
stonepony 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now they should do a bill that says breaking the law the illegal and elections laws will actually apply next time.

2
HighVoltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

What kind of human garbage would oppose this?

1
Reborned20 1 point ago +1 / -0

retroactivly

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's great. But remember what happened in Nevada. They had the machines do the signature verification and they turned down the percentage of matching to the lowest setting. So if the machine thought it was at least 30% chance of a match it called it a match. We know that many non-matching signatures were called good by the machines. Nevada has major fraud because of this.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
HiddenDekuScrub 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know we say this a lot, but "it begins".

Maybe we should just start saying "it continues".

1
jonwick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Signature verification is worthless. They just turn down the verification percentage on the machines. This is nothing more than political theater.

1
DenturesNancy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right. Just like the chy-na virus pcr test, the test can easily be manipulated to fit the end result. Get rid of electronic machines and only have in-person voting with ID check.

1
YouHadMeAtGaming 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does this mean for the audit, or for future elections? Both are good, I’m just hoping it’ll include the former.

1
KnightRadiant88 1 point ago +1 / -0

only 31 is a worry in itself

2
TravlingThr0ugh [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is. Most are hoping this goes away without actually doing something. They also want voters move on to 2022 and forget about 2020, no longer being angry about election fraud. They didn’t count on Trump fighting back and keep talking about election fraud until 2024.

1
Wcvarn 1 point ago +1 / -0

29 advocates for felony voter fraud?

1
CaptInsano2024 1 point ago +1 / -0

They already had signature verification. You have to have a form of state ID to receive a ballot and on that ID is your signature. The ballots run through computers that compare the 2. So im guessing it's requiring non computer verification or something.

1
Endprism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who would vote against this wants fraud

1
my_sides 1 point ago +1 / -0

heart-breaking for liberal tyrants

1
evenrudes 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only they would enable it retroactively and verify every god dam signature on absentee ballots of 2020 election

1
jcgearhart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Veto coming.

1
TravlingThr0ugh [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Probably.

1
Ilanna 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice start, but until we have voter ID I'm not letting up on them.

-9
YodaBannon -9 points ago +1 / -10

You a big fine woman when you back that thang up girl who is you playin with back that thang up

6
TravlingThr0ugh [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Huh?