Comments (60)
sorted by:
Peashout 60 points ago +60 / -0

No long term data yet.

No shit. That's why you do extended testing on new medicines. Not spit them out in 6 months and hope for the best.

MustBeTrump 38 points ago +38 / -0

They've used bullshit phrases like that this entire time and it makes me furious.

"no evidence of dangerous long term effects from the vaccine"

"no evidence that the antibodies stick around for more than 4 months" (length of the study at the time was 4 fucking months) - therefore, get the vaccine.

"no verified studies of human to human transmission"

"no long term data to suggest that (drug Trump suggests) can help"

They're sick, deranged, evil fucks.

kernel 17 points ago +17 / -0

"no evidence that the antibodies stick around for more than 4 months"

not to mention that measuring antibodies titers is pointless because immunity is waaay more complicated than that

MustBeTrump 11 points ago +11 / -0

no evidence that immunity lasts more than 6 months (study started 6 months ago)

They don't care about your science or facts, they care about being able to lie to your face and force you to take their experimental gene therapy whilst technically telling you the truth.

Peashout 5 points ago +5 / -0

So many times during this bullshit I've said to myself,

"Did they just throw out proven science? That's not even how germs work, what the fuck?"

Sgt_Hatred 4 points ago +4 / -0

They found antibodies in bone marrow a year later from people who got sick. They dont know shit.

Here_we_go 9 points ago +9 / -0

Heart cells do not repair. Ever. Like ever ever.

There is your long term study.

Sgt_Hatred 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, thats why somebody with a hole in their heart since birth might hit their 30s if they keep healthy habits to offset it. Still, they can easily drop dead, in the blink of an eye, during a leisurely morning jog.

women_for_trump 29 points ago +29 / -0

It's only the heart. How important is it really?

BlitheringIdiot 22 points ago +22 / -0

Since the left has none, they underestimate its importance.

women_for_trump 9 points ago +9 / -0

Fair point

TAIWANNUMBERONE 24 points ago +24 / -0

"but is not a new disease"

"no long-term data available yet"

Pick one.

ModernKnight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Myocarditis is not a new disease, but the relations to the mRNA alteration have no long-term data. From what we know, short-term, initial reports show myocarditis hitting 30 to 200 times the number of teens who have recently gotten the mRNA alteration. It hits men much more often than women.

kernel 24 points ago +24 / -0

it is most common in <30 years old because for >30 years old you claim it's fucking natural and no link to the disease, "they are just old, it's normal" and shit

2fat2queerious 15 points ago +15 / -0

It went from only teenagers, to mid twenties, to 30 in about a week.

TheImpossible1 22 points ago +22 / -0

If it only affected women they'd be banned by now.

honeymussie 29 points ago +29 / -0

I'm not sure about that. There are lots of posts online of women's periods being all over the place and extremely heavy after the vaccine and the CDC is happily ignoring those too and still recommending it for pre-pubescent girls.

deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2fat2queerious 7 points ago +7 / -0

Weird issue. Killing women's fertility is great to them. If it gave them skin problems or something it would get attention

TheImpossible1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, it's not killing them, that's the difference.

ModernKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just their children, so the commies are 100% on board with this.

Peashout 18 points ago +18 / -0

I like this one:

If a new rabies shot for dogs came out tomorrow, and five dogs ended up dying, it would be banned worldwide within the day.

flashersenpai 4 points ago +4 / -0

there's more laws forbidding cutting a dog's tail than there are cutting a boy's penis

kek_saved_the_world [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

the science says no long-term data is available so nothing is wrong

mty_green_go 9 points ago +9 / -0

But global warming is real. No long-term data

O_A_N 4 points ago +4 / -0

At this rate there will be no long-term data since all their test subjects will be dead.

aconcernedtroll 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to mention, there is no control group anymore.

that_sound 2 points ago +2 / -0

iT's Not A nEw DiSeAsE!!!!

All the long term data shows that kids generally don't get myocarditis. The short term data says "HOLY SHIT! KIDS ARE SUDDENLY GETTING A LOT OF MYOCARDITIS AFTER GETTING THE VACCINE! SOMETHING'S WRONG! But whatever..."

I do love soothing authoritative summaries.

Groundpounder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah. Ok! 🤤

_Sully_ 11 points ago +11 / -0

It’s important to mention that ANY adverse effects would disqualify it’s use. They pretend like it’s ok if there are some. Absolutely not. There is no such thing as some adverse effects in the beginning then no adverse effects in long term. If any expert tries this they are a liar and should be put in prison.

cyberwar 9 points ago +9 / -0

The long term damage isn't hard to imagine. massive heart attacks and death

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
mty_green_go 13 points ago +13 / -0

In my state they are running radio ads on how to detect blood clots and when to seek treatment. Says they are paid for by Pfizer at the end. Totally not suspicious

snowypepe 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yesterday I saw an ad about how to spot strokes, and how people of any age can get them. Never seen a stroke awareness commercial before and if I did it definitely didn’t mention that anyone can have one.

flashersenpai 2 points ago +2 / -0

"any age" lol yeah I always talked with my friends about getting strokes in 7th grade

justwow 4 points ago +4 / -0

My father was an anesthesiologist on heart surgeries -he always said his most difficult cases were young people with hearts damaged by a virus.

kernel 5 points ago +5 / -0

"within a few days after 2nd dose"


Stanford 5 points ago +5 / -0

They meet to make people feel protected. It's a public relations tactic.

  • After Moderna killed people in California, CDC paused it, then announced it was fine.

  • After J&J caused blood clots, CDC paused it, then announced it was fine.

  • After kids got myocarditis, CDC paused it, then announced it was fine.

SmartWomenLoveTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Liberals I work with: “it’s for the greater good”

HairSniffer 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Dangerous Idea of the Greater Good (Hot Fuzz): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jNhony_Xl4U

Red888 4 points ago +4 / -0

Never trusted our medical establishment much before this shit - and now there are no words. They are flat out evil to inject kids & the brainwashed people can't wake up.

DinosaurAlert 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fuck these people. “Myocarditis is not a new disease.”

No shit/. If the vaccine covered 2% of people in a painful rash, you wouldn’t say “Well, people have had rashes before the vaccine.”

jsphere256 3 points ago +3 / -0

18 to buy tobacco, but slam that needle into every kid in sight

GrayManNumber333 3 points ago +3 / -0

So from totally safe to a little dangerous for some, but still manageable… oh what will next week bring

BlitheringIdiot 3 points ago +3 / -0

So "pump the Vax" was added later?

Rommsey 2 points ago +2 / -0

A bunch of corrupt fucking lunatics in the meeting; just like corporate America. These fucks cannot do anything right but spin their wheels to control the narrative and protect their asses from criminal negligence or even incompetency on the job.

KajensAngel 2 points ago +2 / -0

At which point does it cease to become rare? Are we there yet?

TraitorJoes 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, this is acceptable because there is no long term data per say.

We will get back to you in 4-8 years when we have the data and the death tolls.

Thank you for your participation in our human experiments!

~ Dr. Fauci

sentient-potato 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's not forget the pharma companies are immune from lawsuits until their jabs are actually approved in 2024, if they ever are approved.

So them telling you "nah, it'll be fine" doesn't take into account the medical costs of lifelong myocardial issues. You're on your own with that.

FreddyThePatriot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Whatever. If 30 year olds are getting sick from this, good. You're an adult and you made a retarded decision. Suffer it.

It's the 13 year olds that are being abused.

DinosaurAlert 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're an adult and you made a retarded decision. Suffer it.

I disagree with this. You have thousand of experts spending millions on propaganda that is blared from every news station, web site, and celebrity. I can’t blame -woolen who fall for it.

sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +3 / -1

if you're left with no other choice but to be vaxxed, why would you take the mRNA shit? At least settle for the J&J one that's an old-fashioned viral vector one. Of course, don't take it at all if you have a choice in the matter but if forced, don't do Moderna or Pfizer

kernel 3 points ago +3 / -0

viral vector is gene-based just as mRNA, not really old-fashioned

For old-fashioned you need to wait. But in russia, china, india and other countries they have traditional and protein-based vaccines - there you can get the stamp without gene injection

PonySoldier66 2 points ago +2 / -0


Sgt_Hatred 2 points ago +2 / -0

Heres the thing.. yer smart, you dont take the vaccine.. yer dumb, ya take it. Shit, if yer dumber you let your kids take It. Some speculate it could lead to infertility and depopulation.. yeah.. of stupid people. This is the anti-clevon and the only way to end the idiocracy. Is a bunch of moron jabbers being wiped off the gene pool really a bad thing? This is one of those things you leave alone and it will eventually fix itself. Is it really a bad thing?

cook_does 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds good, all the fighting age men get the vaccine, then their heart will explode when China invades and uses satellite or airborne active denial systems (ADS) to spray the battlefield.

Kaiheitai 2 points ago +2 / -0

You know... I'd like to think there was some grand depopulation scheme or something going on with this poison vax.... But the most likely scenario is that it's just all for money and a compliant population.

acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

No long term data available. You don’t say?