710
Comments (19)
sorted by:
11
UrTVisLying2U [S] 11 points ago +12 / -1

https://www.osha.gov/coronavirus/safework

Note on recording adverse reactions to vaccines: DOL and OSHA, as well as other federal agencies, are working diligently to encourage COVID-19 vaccinations. OSHA does not want to give any suggestion of discouraging workers from receiving COVID-19 vaccination or to disincentivize employers' vaccination efforts. As a result, OSHA will not enforce 29 CFR 1904's recording requirements to require any employers to record worker side effects from COVID-19 vaccination through May 2022. OSHA will reevaluate the agency's position at that time to determine the best course of action moving forward. Individuals may choose to submit adverse reactions to the federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System.

11
TuNeCedeMalis 11 points ago +11 / -0

Literally today I was informed, after rumors leading up to now, that with the new OSHA guidelines our company will be requiring the vax. Guess they just needed to wait until they were no longer liable.

13
info_warrior 13 points ago +13 / -0

You can still sue. The emergency use authorization for the jab states that you cannot be compelled in any manner to get it.

10
Industry4 10 points ago +10 / -0

Record and print out everything the company has said about it. Refuse the jab. When they confront you about it, record the conversation. If they fire you, record the conversation. If they threaten you: record. The goal is to have all of the evidence before they fire you, so you can give it to your attorney. You don't want them coming back and saying that the termination was due to something else, like poor performance. Also, make sure you live in a state that it is legal to record when only 1 of the parties knows it is being recorded.

11
deleted 11 points ago +16 / -5
4
onemoretimeagain22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup,

9
sustainable_saltmine 9 points ago +9 / -0

all they have to do is say "its for sAfETy" and they win any case. People will back down and let it happen because they don't want to be seen "being anti-safety"

6
Skogin 6 points ago +6 / -0

But “Danger” is my middle name.

3
StrongIsland 3 points ago +4 / -1

They said that about masks and were proven wrong, is it safe if a pilot seizures out and crashes after being vaccinated? How about a bus driver, train conductors? The captain just had a heart attack and sunk the ship, enlarged heart after covid vax 🧐

8
CrouchingKamala 8 points ago +8 / -0

They did this weeks ago relly back employee protection not for science, but to combat vaccine hesitency, per their own statement. The decision was made on emotions, not logic and science. A comment further down this thread has said statement.

5
pby1000 5 points ago +7 / -2

For full disclosure, and to comply with the Nuremberg laws, people need to be fully informed of adverse reactions.

4
MAGA0729 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're an idiot if you think Laws mean anything anymore.

4
sad_State_of_Affairs 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why would they not cover side effects since they are perfectly safe. Sound like a sure bet, unless.....

2
wu_tang_clan 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly, there's no coffidence in this vaccine, why?

4
TGNX 4 points ago +4 / -0

First yes, then no, then yes again? Oh, wait, they don't have to report it?

Put down the crack pipe, OSHA.

3
Bonami 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, the mask is slipping away.

3
Mintap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like insurance fraud.

1
DaemonKrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

In my opinion, if you allow someone else to make healthcare choices for you.. you get what you deserve. If my employer mandates me to take a drug (i don't care what it is) I have a responsibility to research it myself, and make my own informed decision. You get to pick your poison.

I got hired early this year and during the interview I specifically asked if they were requiring "the jab", they said no. I flat out told them if that ever changes I will be gone without a moment's hesitation.