2324
Comments (221)
sorted by:
153
deleted 153 points ago +163 / -10
61
tom_machine 61 points ago +70 / -9

Anyone who talks that fast can’t possibly do enough thinking in that time to speak accurately. See also: Tim Pool

18
karn 18 points ago +30 / -12

You'd have to watch Tim Pool to know that about him...

37
anon2309011 37 points ago +43 / -6

You need to have a minimum IQ of 80 to know Tim Pool is an idiot.

25
karn 25 points ago +28 / -3

IMHO every time a Tim Pool link is being posted here, it's being posted by Tim Pool or his close friends or business associates, LOL

14
HulkHogan42069 14 points ago +14 / -0

🤣🤣🤣 he gets his views and we roast the shit out of him. I’m ok with that arrangement. Fucking beanie baldie

14
blastarr 14 points ago +14 / -0

Tim Pool is in his mid 30s and he dresses like he's still a kid in his teens. That beanie needs to go.

7
TophunkUSA 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm as bald as he is so I say it should stay! Hairpieces are too expensive anyways.

5
DickTick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Have you seen what's under it?..... It ain't going nowhere lol

2
HulkHogan42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agreed, fren. He could wear an age appropriate hat and people wouldn’t ridicule him. Dude needs to grow up

2
karn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just wanna go toboggan riding with him. I don't really care to hear about his opinions on politics.

3
WhitePowerRanger 3 points ago +5 / -2

He wears that beanie to hide the scar from when they removed his brain because it was just one giant clump of cancer

3
Titan93 3 points ago +5 / -2

Tim Pool isn't that bad. Hes got some really based and patriotic guests on. Tonight he had a guy talking about how ivermectin can end this man made virus before it mutates. He was tearing into the gene therapy too. Good guests sometimes

3
Fenlandlad 3 points ago +4 / -1

Agreed, he has some bad takes and I do laugh at him occasionally. But I don't dislike the guy, he never claimed to be a conservative or right wing and he also supported trump unlike Ben.

3
swifty123456 3 points ago +3 / -0

but tim pool says it is complicated

1
Titan93 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hes why the totalitarian fascist left might be right, but here's why the populist right might be too.

14
tom_machine 14 points ago +14 / -0

God forbid, anyone think for themselves around here

4
Dravous 4 points ago +4 / -0

I watched him for a while because he was covering actual issues instead of ignoring them. I stopped whenI realized he always stopped just short of identifying the cause and solution to the problems he was talking about.

he knows the answers, but he won't just say them.

15
redditcansuckme 15 points ago +17 / -2

Tim was so close to getting it. He had that red pill sitting under his tongue for months and the night of the election he had it halfway down his throat. Then as soon as the cheat was in you could sense his relief as he had an excuse to spit it back out. He lost his only chance to actually get it.

10
jomten 10 points ago +10 / -0

Hes not jumping on that grenade for Trump or us.

Even a braindead leftist can see where the winds blowing on youtube. If he even tiptoes around the subject he risks a ban, and hes still in that "afraid to fully commit" mindset ex-libs have right after realizing Democrats are shit.

1
redditcansuckme 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't make me respect him any.

1
jomten 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same. Just understand what he is and dont let it hurt your feelings that he isnt 100% on board the train with us.

I swear its easy to see that the ones who get the most hate here are the ones people really liked but are now massively disappointed by

Tucker, shapiro, pool, pence

But they arent on our side, they never were. They saw which way the crowd was moving and ran in front to look like they were leading it

6
Klaus73 6 points ago +8 / -2

To be fair - Tim is doing his job - which seems to be doing well; end of the day Tim tries to get Trump credit for the good he has done. I do not like the constant “I’m a fence sitter half Korean” stuff as it seems like a lame request for indulgence. Tim’s business requires he remain in good standing with YouTube; I think people need to understand how hard it is to be pro-Trump on YouTube and not a major public figure. I see him as just like many folks on here - he speaks out as much as he can without throwing it all away. Trump needs more folks like Tim Pool in his corner as those fan bases will eventually be the only people hearing Trumps side of things and Tim is currently trying to get out from under YouTube before it’s too late.

-1
Tr0mp -1 points ago +1 / -2

this is the only rational comment on here

3
Brownwaterboys 3 points ago +3 / -0

watch out throwaway1776 will come here to defend beta cuck tim pool. Thats all he does here is comment on tim pool posts....i wonder if he is tim. A fate worse than death

42
gustodog 42 points ago +43 / -1

Ben never met a war (for Israel's interests) he didn't like.

That whole Michelle Fields debacle should have buried his career.

27
VoteCyborgTrump2040 27 points ago +28 / -1

Yes it should have. As someone newly minted in political life so-to-speak, I didn't really understand anything. I was impressed by his arguments. Despite everything, he is actually educated and fairly good at making arguments against ridiculous leftist positions (something that becomes easy for almost anyone paying attention).

But I should have known then and there what he was. Quitting Breitbart over someone "pushing down" Michelle Fields, even though the interaction is on video and clearly never happened is the clearest indication you can get that Ben is an establishment shill.

But let's say you were fooled by him while Trump was in office, since he switched his narratives to talking about Trump doing good. As soon as the fraud happened, where did he go, and what did he say?

People need to wake up and realize they are only about 5% redpilled, and these grifter, controlled opposition losers are not redpilling them. They are corralling the 5% redpilled people and ensuring they stay dancing to the MSM tune, and don't get further redpilled. You are only listening to them because you are ALREADY partially redpilled. They exist to keep you from going any further. To reestablish faith in most of the establishment. To make you feel as if you're smarter than everyone, just the same way they make those snarky leftist faggots think they're smarter than everyone for sticking with the establishment.

17
Drooperdoo 17 points ago +17 / -0

Like a leftist, Ben engaged in a hoax during the Michelle Fields debacle, said that "Trump hires thugs," and "Trump's supporters are brown shirts". He then went onto all the leftwing media outlets and coordinated with them to promote the same CNN talking points that Democrats were using. In 2017, he said on his show "Trump emboldens white supremacists".

Ben is a leftist. He has ALWAYS been a leftist.

Only leftists participate in hoaxes to make a point. Only leftists talk about "the evils of white supremacy," etc.

Watch Ben's videos. On one campus, he enjoins the students to larp as Communists to get better grades in school. He then brags about how he wrote like a Communist to get advancement. Right there: Ben revealed himself to be a shapeshifter. A man without principle or character. He was advising the young people to "lie to get what you want". "Pretend to be someone you're not if it will gain you an advantage."

This is PRECISELY what Ben did by pretending to be a conservative. Spoiler alert: He was NEVER a conservative.

Ben is as authentic as a three-dollar bill.

His job was to be a pied piper and to lead conservatives to defeat by backing unelectable candidates like Marco Rubio. His job was to teach conservatives "how to lose like gentlemen".

It's shocking how very little it takes to scratch his surface and to find a "hoax-peddling, anti-white bigot" underneath his GOP branding.

5
VoteCyborgTrump2040 5 points ago +5 / -0

Why are there so few people who actually understand this? How are people always fooled by these snakes?

3
hilboggins 3 points ago +3 / -0

They get impressed by the fast talk, big words, audience cheers and the work of hoards of researchers in the background.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
10
deleted 10 points ago +12 / -2
1
CyclopticErotica 1 point ago +5 / -4

I should say Hi to the new guy. Who do you work for, friend?

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
3
Joesf23 3 points ago +3 / -0

He was trying to get a side piece but instead showed his cuck nature and anti maga nature...some of the cruzlims in 2016 were the OGs of the nevertrump movement. Fuck they were pissed.

3
blastarr 3 points ago +3 / -0

His simping for Michelle Fields was a total fail. Bitch didn't even give him a handjob!!

2
blastarr 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://townhall.com/columnists/benshapiro/2005/08/10/why-war-in-iraq-is-right-for-america-n1216871

When this douchebag wrote this piece, he was of fighting age. Why couldn't he go to Iraq and fight for our country if he believed in it so much?

11
Azrael14 11 points ago +13 / -2

I disagree with Ben on a host of issues. Especially the 2020 election, January 6th, and Covid. But don't forget Andrew Breitbarts golden rule about not going after other conservatives. Ben has done a lot of good in the culture war. The video of him schooling race baiters in a panel after they laughed at the idea that there was a problem with black culture that leads to inequity is what redpilled me. I had never heard the violent crime statistics before

5
Redpillmachine 5 points ago +6 / -1

Even though Ben is more of a neocon, about him and Ann Coulter I would at least say they work really hard. Look all the protests they go through just to be able to speak at colleges.

Plus Ben has had some great owns. My favorite is a girl asking: where does it say only girls can be in the Girl Scouts? Ben: In the name... Girl Scouts

Anyways guess point is don’t throw the baby out with the bath water

3
Drooperdoo 3 points ago +6 / -3

Yes, Ben "owns" 19 year-old potheads. Impressive. When up against adults, though, he gets clowned. Like his embarrassing appearance on the BBC, with Andrew Neil. Ben got rag dolled. He looked like a petulant, entitled little bitch.

Ben has to be carefully guarded from debates with adults, because he looks like the used car salesman he is. He won't even come within 50 miles of someone like Nick Fuentes, for fear of getting savaged. (And hint: He would.)

So . . . "Stick to the 19 year-old potheads, Ben."

2
slowmotrin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly man this is the type of take that dishonest leftists that never actually watch bens content make. His biggest and most famous debate was with Piers Morgan on guns, it was the one that put him on the map. Plus the debate with Andrew Neil was obviously a setup because it was supposed to be an interview for a book, but he never even asked a single question about his book. The whole line about him debating college kids is the same thing leftist say about Stephen Crowder, neither of which are true, most quote unquote adult leftists refuse to even talk to these guys.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
DonuteaterReturns 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love how people cant even have a real Q&A session. really woke me up to the controlled opposition.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
4
Drooperdoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes, Ben isn't an actual conservative. So the rule doesn't apply.

1
Axiom502 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell me this (((Faggot))) thinks the 2020 election was legit??

1
DonuteaterReturns 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. The rule is don't punch right. I'm more right wing than Shapiro so I can punch him.

7
karn 7 points ago +14 / -7

Yeah, Shapiro is for faggots that fuck other men, climax, and then shove the other man away and say "gross, what are you doing, I'm not gay!"

6
doug2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Bro THATS gay.

2
HulkHogan42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s not gay if there’s no eye contact

3
ronburgandy 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's only gay if the balls touch

3
Brendancs0 3 points ago +3 / -0

gross

2
HulkHogan42069 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤣🤣🤣

4
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 4 points ago +4 / -0

I regret that I can only upvote this once.

65
MarginofFraud 65 points ago +65 / -0

I don't want to come out here to defend Ben, but it's not uncommon for people to pay Facebook advertising costs. $3 million is probably a fraction of what Daily Wire gets back in return. Is it ill-advised move? Probably. Daily Wire is way out ahead of anyone in terms of Facebook traffic, so he's getting his message out there. Donald Trump also used FB to great success and likely paid them quite a bit for advertising purposes too. Ultimately that money is empowering a deeply unethical company. FB has happily taken people's money (like Trump's) and then kicked them from the platform. It could happen to Daily Wire.

12
Mattdaking 12 points ago +12 / -0

spot on. Baffles me that Ben is even giving money to Facebook while his own company gets suppressed by big tech. Sure having a page to promote your company is one thing but giving 3 mil is another. Trump was also running for reelection so that s understandable.

13
Creepy_Ginger 13 points ago +14 / -1

WE call that a CUCK.

0
kissmyasthma100 0 points ago +2 / -2

What if your dad gets banned from twitter but you keep using it?

5
shadows_of_the_mind 5 points ago +5 / -0

And FB, and Instagram. It’s dumb to criticize the right for continuing to use the dominant platforms to get out their messaging. Sadly, discussing politics on a site like Patriots isn’t advancing our movement. Everyone here already agrees on America First. We have to expand it to where the normies reside, and that sadly happens to currently be FB twatter insta etc

2
Spirit_bond 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. Anybody can own libs on fb, even shapiro. If you don't mind being called a racist insurrectionist and if you can keep your cool, it's not too bad jumping into the deluded comment section to make an argument that can't be denied.

1
Mattdaking 1 point ago +1 / -0

For sure. I’m sure most conservatives would love to leave the big tech companies but then there would be very little outreach to redpill the normies and cucks

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
6
IntrepidBurger 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, exactly. Benji is a cuck but advertising on Facebook is common sense given how many normies use it.

4
shadows_of_the_mind 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the right take. Shapiro, like Trump, is very effective at marketing his content within enemy territory. FB will gladly take anyone’s money and operate like a platform should. However, all sites will naturally trend right wing because left wing ideas need censorship to survive. The error in the logic of using platforms like FB is that they’ll continue to house your content once you become too big of a threat to their internal politics

4
Drooperdoo 4 points ago +4 / -0

But that's the thing: Facebook is NOT "enemy territory". Shapiro famously eats dinners with Mark Zuckerberg and Youtube's Susan Wojcicki.

They have . . . shall we say . . . a tribal loyalty to each other.

Ben is a "made man," immune from censorship because he's controlled opposition. He has never been anything BUT.

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +1 / -0

So yeah. Facebook IS enemy territory, unless you’re on the inside

0
45454545454545454545 0 points ago +1 / -1

No, sites do not trend right wing. Left wing ideas do need censorship to survive, but they make up for it with with endless blatantly false "facts" that no one is allowed to dispute.

2
shadows_of_the_mind 2 points ago +2 / -0

facts that no one is allowed to dispute

So… censorship.

22
Bongos 22 points ago +23 / -1

That's a big advertising budget. He's right sometimes I'll concede, but most of his thinking and positions are obvious.

21
BoatingAccident 21 points ago +22 / -1

he probably does not make the ad buying decisions either. just saying. a lot of folks don't really understand this. it's like the leftists who think Trump literally fills out his own taxes lol

10
45fan 10 points ago +10 / -0

Somehow libtards believe this is going on.

Trump to his tax lawyers:

"Cheat bigly okay? The biggest fraud! I know you won't tell anyone or have a crisis of conscience"

6
Zskills 6 points ago +6 / -0

I want the best fraud, okay? Big, beautiful fraud! We'll break so many laws, that I can tell you. And we'll get billion and billions and billions of dollars

2
IntrepidBurger 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shapiro is notorious for micro-managing his company.

2
BoatingAccident 2 points ago +2 / -0

well then shame on him for being a ruthless hypocritical businessman with no moral compass. especially over the past year (if he was using them during recent times).

still the best way to reach his target. they have a monopoly. break them up.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
pwntent 1 point ago +1 / -0

he def approves a 3mil budget..

1
BoatingAccident 1 point ago +1 / -0

he's could just be like "I don't care how the sausage is made, get me listeners!".

you know. instead of "I'm a CIA spy muhahahahahaha"

just throwin that out there. call it a conspiracy.

3
karn 3 points ago +4 / -1

That's called "limited hangout"

You put a little bit of truth in the Lie Soup so the normies eat it up.

Exact same principle as baiting traps with food that's poisoned, instead of just filling the trap with poison.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good god being right "sometimes" is not remotely positive. Hell anaconda is right sometimes. If your job is to inform people and you're only right now and again you're fucking worthless

20
Mobmando 20 points ago +21 / -1

He means nothing to me. I used to watch him but he is useless. He really has nothing to offer.

17
stickerking 17 points ago +18 / -1

Is t that just waht companies do? Facebook runs adds, why not use them to spread your message? Hell i run page for my church and i can pay to have the posts show up in more peoples feeds

17
one3five 17 points ago +17 / -0
8
Toobin247 8 points ago +9 / -1

Thank you. I wish people would include the link with the screenshot

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
one3five 3 points ago +3 / -0

you're welcome!

14
smartass 14 points ago +14 / -0

He is such a colossal shmuck. I can't stand him.

10
BS2020 10 points ago +11 / -1

faker -- poser -- hack -- ba bye, although I said ba bye a long time ago realizing what a poser he was lol

10
Shwoogin 10 points ago +13 / -3

So? The implication being.... what? That he lines the pockets of our enemies?

23
Mobmando 23 points ago +27 / -4

That his popularity and views are not natural and are actually mostly because his vids are shoved in enough peoples faces.

He is also in bed with the enemy, yes, it implicates him. There are likely add ons to that agreement like persuading people that the shit show in November was above board. Check.

8
BoatingAccident 8 points ago +8 / -0

You're probably right, but to play devil's advocate, he probably has a marketing team that sets up all his ad buys. I'm sure he sees the line items but it's probably he does not really participate in his marketing decisions. He probably also markets heavily through other channels. Some based, many not.

4
Barbs 4 points ago +5 / -1

It’s pretty well-known that when it comes to online advertising, where you want results, the two options are Google AdSense and Facebook. Google controls 60% of the ad market and Facebook holds about 35%. That last bit is everybody else.

Putting an ad on the rest might make you feel good about supporting a platform with your advertising dollars, but they won’t move the needle in any significant way. And that’s like the whole point of advertising.

I guess we can say at least he’s not supporting Google with that much spend on Facebook, though Facebook lends itself more to information sharing while Google is more product/service centric.

3
DonJr2032 3 points ago +5 / -2

He's pure cheese. He's not natural. He's artificially a "leader" in Republican thought.

4
BoatingAccident 4 points ago +5 / -1

never said i liked the guy!

At least you didn't put words in my mouth. I'm sure those folks are incoming though.

Only 5% of the people on this board are capable of nuance. To put it in hyperbolic terms. :) :) :)

2
Staatssicherheit 2 points ago +4 / -2

He lined the pockets of the company that just sent out the creepy as fuck stasi notifications.

The question will be whether Shapiro will continue supporting this creepy ass anti-American company.

1
UnusualPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

dailywire n ben shapiro came out in support of FB back when Trump was still a president and there was hearing n scrutiny about fb being biased against conservatives.. now we know why

6
davidmode 6 points ago +6 / -0

Did you guys know his wife's a doctor?

5
WildRiot 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well, he is in tje tiny hat club

3
Joesf23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shut. It. Down.

5
Vsid 5 points ago +5 / -0

Lesson being “ They won’t bite the hand that feeds them”, as long as the check is big enough that is...

5
markcromwell 5 points ago +5 / -0

Guys. The whole point of Facebook is advertising. If you want to sell a product online you've got to deal with Facebook/Twitter/Google. Put them together they are a monopoly.

5
tehkelso 5 points ago +6 / -1

Well... yeah. He's an Republican establishment mouthpiece that keeps boomers on the Fox News train of thought.

3
aboardthegravyboat 3 points ago +3 / -0

Boomers have never heard of Benji

4
Spock_Logic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shapiro is an insufferable elite who judges people by what school and what degree they have. I hated the way he went after Trump by mocking him. Trump is much more successful than that little turd will ever be.

4
Efrum 4 points ago +5 / -1

Duplicitous little fucker. Oh no, liberals are censoring conservatives. Here's some money liberals.

4
CmonPeopleGetReal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol, dude look at how much Trump spent with Facebook. Who gives a fuck.

There are a ton of people on Fagbook still, for certain demos it is smart advertising.

3
jsnforce 3 points ago +3 / -0

You people are often morons, but especially so when it comes to Ben Shapiro and similar figures. It's like, you forget how the internet works, or that they agree with you on 90% of issues, or that they're actually providing a meaningful, important role in redpilling people.

"controlled opposition" man fuck off.

You feel way too comfortable anonymously talking shit from behind your computer screens while providing absolutely zero fucking value to anyone in this fight. If these people are controlled opposition, you're nothing at all.

Like some fat guy taking shit about how an athlete is performing. Let's see you do it better. Let's see you do fucking ANYTHING AT ALL.

3
Congress_is_ISIS 3 points ago +5 / -2

Its why he doesn't talk about anything important like the fraud. Its all about the Sheckles. Always has been. Just like fox news. They give you just enough to keep you watching but when it comes to something important they drop the ball on purpose.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
OconusLurex 2 points ago +2 / -0

Damning with faint praise.

3
MAGAdadUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn’t that just called advertising?

3
Zskills 3 points ago +3 / -0

"Muh fastest growing conservative talk show"

Ahahahahaa.... because you forced your content on people??? That is RICH!!!!!

3
deleted 3 points ago +5 / -2
5
cosmos411 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's unfortunate people can't see the forest for the trees in here. I love this place but have seen a distinct change in attitude over recent months. We used to think more critically, but now it's just "if you do anything we don't like then fuck you". I can appreciate that feeling as I have it often. Hell, we're frustrated as all fucking Hell in here. However when I do I sit back and think about what is going on. At first I was angry when I heard the news about Owens and Shapiro but then I thought about it. You don't redpill by advertising on a conservative platform. That's just an echo chamber because we already think this way. You want to try and change the way your opponent/enemy thinks and that's by going into their lair and pissing in the corner. Yeah it sucks giving money to FB, but people you want to convert aren't coming here to read the comments.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
Peashout 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise......

2
Joesf23 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Bob had bitch tits"

3
Dutch_Christian 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they advertised on a platform with a lot of boomers. And you know this. And you still think this guilt by association. In commie culture that is considered evidence. It will get you ten years in the gulag. You may not enter the matrix to get to the boomers is your position?

3
Trump2024 3 points ago +3 / -0

So did Prager University and Candace Owens. What's the big deal?

0
ChickenInspector 0 points ago +1 / -1

All three are triators.

3
latsbruh 3 points ago +3 / -0

"but i had to!" nope, at all

2
we_won_the_war_jack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fag boy.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
KARURUKA2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Obviously

2
magasf3n 2 points ago +2 / -0

So he successfully advertised on Facebook? Is that really the story here? I don’t listen to Ben Shapiro but I mean come on, is there something in the article other than completely normal business practices?

2
BaconRingBandit 2 points ago +2 / -0

I believe that bitch was caught on a hot mic asking producers to censor his "pansexuals are weird" comment in fear of being boycotted.

2
acasper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did people not realize that this is how Facebook works or something?

2
WonkoTheInsane 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tricks of the tribe number 23. Controlled opposition.

2
Grief 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hahahaha I always wondered why he got so much attention. He has to buy an audience to listen to his pathetic RINO garbage. I remember someone one told me "he's really popular on Facebook" and laughing about it. It all makes sense now.

2
NoMoreMao 2 points ago +2 / -0

Talmud shit.

2
MICHIGANisRED 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ben Shapiro's opinions are for sale. I used to watch/listen but there's very little I see eye to eye on with him anymore.

2
y_do_i_need_to_hide 2 points ago +2 / -0

This shouldn't surprise anyone. You think they compromised all of our government officials but we have media Representatives? The good and bad news is that it is all bulshit every bit of it

2
WildRiot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yup. One big Kabuki theater layer to reality for the citizenry

2
MySidesGoUp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well..you know....his wife is a doctor, so.....

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
cbonez416 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, who cares. Atleast the man is out there trying. Might not be a big trump supporter but he still has conservative value. Not everyone see eye to eye. He is still on this side. Tolerance... right? Or are we becoming the left.

1
HulkHogan42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

“Oh my goodness! I can’t believe he did that! Surely he had a good reason!”

  • No One
1
StadiumHopper 1 point ago +1 / -0

So what?

1
Endprism 1 point ago +2 / -1

I hate this cuck so much. Reject this little neocon asshole

1
AllVaccinesCauseHarm 1 point ago +2 / -1

Pedes that upvote Shapiro content are fags and should feel like fags. Disavow!

1
FORMERCHILDSTAR 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ben Shapiro is not on your team. He is on team Shapiro. Just remember that.

1
Pelosi_Halitosis 1 point ago +1 / -0

He looks like that gun grabber fag. Hogg?

1
hillaryprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

Smart guy, great at debating, especially master debating. But I disagree with at least 1/3 of his views. He follows leftist culture somewhat, even though he doesn't realize it.

1
Joesf23 1 point ago +1 / -0

I dont care what he spent, he is not maga and threw the whole movement overboard on 1/6 while claiming zilch fraud. What a fag

1
vcjdeathrow 1 point ago +2 / -1

the tribe has a history of playing both sides.

1
SpezDispenser 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dude is a little shit. Reaffirmed by the fact that an ex libtard friend used to say he was "a ok."