3118 Gay Chorus : ⚠️SIX Registered Offenders and Counting⚠️ (media.patriots.win) posted 1 year ago by TheBritisher 1 year ago by TheBritisher +3120 / -2 250 comments download share 250 comments share download save hide report block hide replies
how long before we hear that the sex offender registry is the new Jim Crow
Giant tropical centipedes share their territories with tarantulas. Despite it's impressive length, it's a nimble navigator, And some can be highly venomous. As quick as lightning, just like the tarantula it's killing, The centipede has two curved hollow fangs which inject paralyzing venom. Even tarantulas aren't immune from an ambush.
This centipede is a predator
They glory in their shame.
THE COUNT IS NOW UP TO TWENTY ACCORDING TO 4CHAN https://patriots.win/p/12jJUiYtwR/4chan-lists-twenty-convicted-sex/c/
hopped the fence from GA to check out this post, HOLY SHIT!!!!
They said theyre doing everything in their power to get that vid scrubbed from the webs, so archive it while its hot. They're not gonna memory hole this. No effin way.
full song https://patriots.win/p/12jJZEywID/well-convert-your-children--down/c/
Gay Chorus statement https://patriots.win/p/12jJUiXFuk/sf-gay-chorus-its-our-turn/c/
Random question, but did I just see it in a film or something, where you're notified if someone on the registry moves in nearby? Thankfully I don't know much about the sex offender registry but I always thought that they had to come and inform you or something.
Kyle was a hero.
You can look them up in your area. Just found a couple within two miles of my new house. Tempted to put warning signs up at the mailbox because lots of kids live in my neighborhood and their parents probably don’t know several sick fucks live within 2 miles
I can't see why doing that would be anything other than heroic. These people made a choice to do one of the most evil things you can conceivably do. Your signs could literally prevent a child from being raped, and instil the mindset into these children that they need to be careful.
I'm definitely not defending it, but I do at least want to point out that, in my state (and many others), you can end up in that registry/on that list for literally taking a piss on the side of the road or in the woods (and I know people who have been charged for that). Just something to consider
Yeah, but most sex offender registries will list what the person was convicted of. So I’m not buying what you’re selling. Absolutely they need to put a sign out if there’s some sick fuck living that close.
I definitely don't disagree at all (and would still advocate for signs at their homes even with knowing some of them, their only crime was taking a piss), but whether you "buy what I'm selling [I'm not 'selling' anything]" or not, it's a fact, and at least in my state: no, it doesn't distinguish or list the specifics of the crime, and we also don't have a public records database that can be accessed online to look up arrest records and convictions of people anyway (many states do have these, like where I used to live, but current state it's not public, and no gov't websites w/ that info. Only thing I've seen are private paysites that say they'll find this info for a fee per person). So as far as the public is concerned, a dude that took a piss in public can, and will/does show up alongside actual, dangerous convicts that have committed sexual assault/rape/pedophilia if one were to look at the registry. And in the case it does list the crime, indecent exposure can range from "taking a piss" to "drag queen story hour tranny shows cock to 4 year olds." That's the difference between "someone I'd probably hang out with/get along with," and "someone I'd like to put in the ground," but on paper, there's no distinction.
I personally know people where this has happened (they showed me their arrest record; were literally just taking a piss [and drunk] — but nothing that is publicly available makes this clear. They just appear in the same database as pedophiles and rapists for committing a 'crime' that falls within the same legal category because of its classification as indecent exposure [not always, but a ton get charged with this for just taking a piss alone, or somewhat distanced from a few people, usually friends], etc). That's why I'm pointing this out; b/c it's a huge flaw in our system that needs to be addressed, and one of the few major topics my work and research in public policy, centered mostly around criminal justice [and drug policy] reform, is focused on. I almost had it happen myself once, peeing outside at a small gathering w/ friends and cops showed up as I was pissing - I was threatened to "put it away now..." and as I was saying "I'm mid-stream, I can't stop" I was told "stop or not, back in the pants or I'm arresting you for indecent exposure"
The registry has levels and I think time limits. Someone may have pissed in an alley and been put on the registry, but it almost never happens and if it does, he gets removed. Same as Romeo/Juliet situations. People against the registry like to bring them up but they almost never happen.
In my state it's common enough to be worth advocating for reforms without one insinuating that advocating for such reforms is a veiled attempt to remove the registry. I'm for the registry, and I'm against the unusually high amount of non-sexual-offenders that get put on it because of the weaponization of our legal system that allows LEO and judges to indiscriminately convict someone of indecent exposure, compel them to accept a plea deal as if they are being done a favor because it at least "avoided jail time," while still landing them on the registry. People really need to wake up to what's happening wrt our LEO and criminal/justice systems, especially given how much they hate conservatives, and we've already seen them weaponized against 'dissenters.' We've seen this all year, and plenty here will learn the hard way why things like this are important when they find themselves on a registry and/or w/ terrorist accusations for their right-of-Marx political beliefs. For such liberty-minded people that are so capable of seeing corruption and tyranny, I have a really hard time understanding the gigantic blindspot so many conservatives (or anyone to the right) has when it comes to matters like this
Unfortunately I have an HOA, and they are commonly communist tyrants. I’ll most likely print and put up at night.
When I was growing up, there was this family in the neighborhood who I now realize were neglecting their kids. When the daughter was a toddler, we'd find her in all kinds of places, at our house a tenth of a mile away, or toddling along the sidewalk on a busy street. Maybe no one did anything because when we saw the mother, she was always well-dressed with perfect makeup and hair? Personally I was a child myself. I watched the oldest brother spray a dog (one of the neighbors' dogs) with a hose and grin at the way the animal yelped and tried to get away from the cold water, despite being tied up.
Anyway, that's a lot of text to get to the point that when the second brother was in his 20s, he raped a 13-year-old girl. We should have seen it coming.
All of the women on the registries around me are young and attractive "Hot for Teacher" bait lol
I don't know if it works the same in every state, but I got a postcard in the mail once warning me that a registered sex offender was moving in nearby.
That's exactly what I'm talking about. No clue where that's a thing and where it isn't.
Have you had a few drinks? I'm not sure that comment made much sense at all, especially in relation to my question.
All good friend. Take care of yourself.
Are you a female?
I've seen a lotta gays claim it's tongue-in-cheek humor.
They are right, but it's tongue-in-ass-cheek and these filthy faggots gotta stay the fuck away from kids
They're nervous about this...they probably should be.
Absolutely should be.
Should/could/might...it's all semantics; what the tea leaves are showing is that the modality will be "will" if things keep going the way they are.
As I am not particular to incivility gone amok, it would be preferable if any unpleasantness could(!) be avoided as there is no charm in innocent people getting caught up in any backlash, but I think things are getting quite beyond that point.
**sorry, I thought your response was to another comment of mine on this thread; my apologies and then yes, the correct modality is "should"
Nah its state sanctioned doxxing, and the lefties love that shit.
To be honest, in some sense, "it's", as you can get in it for peeing in public. But for the most part, it isn't.
It's SF, could be just because they shat in public, since it's the city's official sport, but I doubt it.
Jim Crow on viagra
It's what the statistics say: 50% of pedophilia cases come out of the 1% of the population that makes up the alphabet community.
Also, the concentration is crazy. The sex offender registry in my town of 40,000 is about 50 names (so about 1 in 1,000) but in this 100-man choir we have 4 to 5 in this picture alone.
Its true. Even the most mild form of their "reproduction" requires spiritual and psychological abuse.
Oof, all that in one sentence.
4 to 5 convicted*
i dont want to know how many of these sick fucks got away with their shit
Every single gay guy that I've met and actually had a conversation with has told me that they were involved in either child abuse (on the receiving end) as a child or incest (experimenting with an uncle or cousin).
We have a brilliant Patriot on here spreading a massive info dump about the relations between childhood abuse/incest and the child becoming gay when older.
I suspect that it happens a LOT more than we think and it'll be an exponential problem, the more we become accepting of LGBTQLMNOP+ the more child predators there'll be, and their abuse victims will grow up to be abusers, that's why the gay population is seemingly growing.
I'll jump in here and throw a wrench in your "statistics". Gay pede here. Nothing, and I mean nothing happened in my childhood that "made me gay". Loving 2 parent family. Dad worked, mom stayed home. No abuse (sexual or otherwise). Got along great with my parents and siblings, and still do to this day. My husband is the same story. My best friend? Gay, and the same. I have spoken with many of my gay friends, and none of them had any childhood sexual encounters. The closest was a friend who had sex with a "straight" married neighbor when he was 16. He knew he was gay long before this encounter, and had been flirting with this older dude for quite some time.
That's a fair wrench to throw in but don't dismiss my "statistics" that I didn't even provide.
50% of pedophiles are homosexuals. That's significant and you can't deny that.
40-50% of gay men in the studies that I'm referencing, claimed to have experienced some form of child abuse or grooming. I don't think that all gay men are gay because they were abused as a child. But it seems like that can cause it.
I've seen this crop up in here a lot but I have to disagree. Maybe there's some correlation, but it's a leap to say there's a causal relationship. I think pedophiles are predominantly attracted to children first and their sex second, because the most overrepresented group among pedophiles are bisexuals, or predators that abuse boys and girls or sleep with both men and women. But I doubt you would consider bisexuals more traumatized or more dangerous than gay men. Maybe gay men in childhood are more likely to predated by pedophiles? Or maybe pedophiles find that it's easier to get unsupervised access to boys? It's a huge oversimplification to say gay men are gay because of childhood sexual abuse because I know many, many gay men that were not abused as children.
Not ALL gay men are gay because of child sexual abuse. But there's just too many of them that claim child sexual abuse to not notice a correlation.
One thing you did say that has some credibility is that maybe they were already gay, because one study I saw did mention that a good percentage, maybe even 90% of the people claim that they thought they were homosexual Before the encounter, but I seriously doubt that could be true. Are we going to accept that gay kids intentionally put themselves in positions where older gay men can abuse them? That's fucked up. What's more likely is that it's a coping mechanism.
We know for a fact that abuse victims are likely to repeat that abuse, so it's not wild to assume that gay child abuse victims are likely to become gay child abusers. The fact that over 50% of child rapists are gay men also is obviously significant.
There's more evidence that becoming gay is environmental than something you're born with. I read a study about identical twins which "confirmed" this too, one of them being gay doesn't make sense if it's genetic.
Well, no. But maybe parents are more likely to leave gay kids in situations where they're more likely to be abused, like absentee parents or fathers? Or maybe gay children are in activities that make them more vulnerable to being targeted, if you figure that a pedophile would be have better access to them alone in something like music, dancing, or solo sports like gymnastics. Or maybe pedophiles target gay children specifically for some other reason, like some kind of self justification or they feel like they're easier to control. Who knows.
It's more like 50% of child sex abuse victims are boys, not that 50% of pedophiles are gay. This study for example https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1556756/ finds that while the proportion of gay to straight pedophiles is higher than the baseline population, it's not 50:50 however, it's more like 10:90, meaning there would have to be a large portion of straight pedophiles having targeted boys.
I've read these studies, and there is definitely both genetic/prenatal factors and environmental factors, given the very high correlation in identical twins even when separated at birth.
Please site the studies that you are referencing. All of the studies that I've read have no where near the percentages that you are stating. Is it higher per capita among the LGBTQIAALMNO+ "community" compared to the "straight" community? Yes. Is it 50%. Not in any study I've seen.
Also keep in mind when the studies were conducted. When Alfred Kinsey was doing his studies, his control group of gays that he was questioning was guys who were convicted of either public sex with other men, or had been convicted of having sex with minors. Hardly a group of your "average" gay men. Trouble was at the time of the study, that was the only group that was easy to find.
I read some research which concluded that it is actually normal for a male younger sibling to develop feminine brain anatomy, in the primitive brain regions, making him more likely to be gay. Does this ring true to you?
For me, yes, I'm the youngest male. For my husband and closest friends, no, they are the oldest ones.
Interesting. So maybe the researcher was a bit too invested in having a find...
I know that study that you were referring too. My mom had read it and was doing the "Hmmm...I wonder how true this is" until I pointed out that I was the only one in my group who it applied to. And I am the most masculine among them all.
Great comment. I don't think that all abuse victims become abusers, obviously. It's just that enough of them do to keep the cycle going. Do you think you were gay before the incident?
So from 5 years old your entire world view was twisted when that happened. There is a link between that and behavior after. I'm not slamming i just think there are things that happened to your personality that changed that you are missing. Having been the youngest in the family i got beat on regularly and that affects you too.
Well considering literally all of them are singing about abusing children.
I'd say every one of them.
The Art of War - Sun Tzu:
He might have suggested we ally with the choirs non pedo's and have them obliterate the sex offenders of their own community while we drink Covfefe with our feet up and laugh at memes...
I’d love to see the data on that. Where did you hear the 50% of pedophilia cases are in the LGBblahblah community?
Also, let’s bear in mind these were the ones who’s victims came forward and who then the DA subsequently were able to prosecute. One wonders what the real offending rate is...?
how did these pedos get out of jail. how do pedos get out of jail in general. it's not like you can cure them.
I once heard a rumor about a coworker being a convicted pedophile. I used Westlaw and found his court case.
When he was 18 he had been hired to babysit a neighbor boy. He gave the boy alcohol and molested him. He pled guilty and was sentencenced to 10 years of probation.
I printed out the court case and arranged to have it anonymously dropped on the desk of his beautiful fiancé who also worked at the same corporation. She called off the engagement and dumped him.
Outing him as a faggot and child molester was the least I could do.
Good job! Saved the poor women from finding out after the marriage and God forbid after they've had children.
You did God's work. You were an angel of mercy for her and her future children.
Doing the Lord's work.
I hope this isn't just fantasy porn and this actually happened.
How exactly does a rumor like that spread? What kind of fucking idiot (a gay pedophile evidently) is stupid enough to let information like that get out?
How do you find people's court cases too? I've tried in the past, a lady I knew drunkenly told me about her boyfriend having a rape conviction in the past and I really wanted to see if she was playing victim or if she was telling the truth but couldn't find a thing.
most states have online case search. put in a name and voila.
I've seen archives on gay men forums bragging about how they ejaculated onto a babies face and pushed the semen into it's mouth training it to be gay and "love daddys dick". My first reaction was it must be some depraved fantasist story telling, but there were more and more and more details.
Holy shit, I don't think I can even type out what would happen if I opened a door and saw that happening to ANY, let alone MY baby. The only thing I can say is that it wouldn't involve any of my firearms. That'd be far too decent and humane
Thanks, that actually made me feel physically sick reading that.
Depending on the state, second degree burglary can be a relatively minor, non-violent crime. Other states count home invasions as second degree burglary, so it depends. Either way, don't be an ass.
Nice moral relativity argument. Kinda useless given that the left can just as easily use the same feature of the same culture to argue the opposite.
Going gitty over finger chopping in a third world shit hole doesn't make you hard. It kinda makes you a creeper. And calling tummy ache a fag just telegraphs that you've been triggered, and oh so easily.
I'm guessing that Tim pool's actual mandingo is harder than yours at rest. Proves nothing, contributes nothing to the discussion, but hey, I totally insulted you and some shit. So there.
Cute handshake account. Wonder what happened to your last one...
I work for CA's CDCR. Pedos are let out on a probative percent chance. They have a high reoffense rate so mostly they go on a registry for X amount of years based on the time they were incarcerated and law section they violated. Parole is tough for them as well. To be considered for release they have to show reform. This is usually through time spent in prison and participation in class work that makes them reflect on their actions and bring about change. The sad thing is that once an inmate is elligable for parole they usually receive it if they have put in minimal effort to "reform" themselves. We can't keep pedos locked up forever because of stupid ACLU and "civil liberties" groups vouching that they made a mistake.
A favorite approach to weakening western nations from the outside is to encourage and normalize crime and unspeakable acts (things people litterally won't talk about). Inundate the system and cause overload induced malfunctions.
It's a real world DDoS attack. A big part of the justification for letting all of the antifa thugs in portland walk was the lack of resources required to hold, charge, convict and incarcerate all of them. No career advancement or political showboating opportunities to be found there, just long hours and hard work no one wants to put in and that supervision won't permit.
They can only run through the courts and incarcerate so many people per year. Preference goes to people who can be convicted with minimal effort and yield the most political capital. Only so many court cases a year to promote yourself with, choose wisely. Which is how we've got hunter's laptop being ignored and feds tripping over themselves and eachother at the chance to confiscate a harmless lego set.
We have people who have demonstrated they cannot be trusted to walk among us through documented, and repeated, victimization of fellow citizens. In spite of this they are encouraged to walk among us, and we are being required to welcome them and bare our bellies to the wolves.
It wreaks havoc with the trust our trust based society needs in order to function properly. And when we are prohibited from talking about it, we are also, by extension, prohibited from doing anything about it.
I've been working my way through 'the gulag archipelago'. Its a long read and can seem repetitive, but the farther I get into it, the more I find that the author revisits themes to add more insight when ground work elsewhere has been laid. He builds all four walls progressively, at the same time, bouncing between them instead of finishing them, one at a time. I have found it to be a very effective way of telling the story. It paints an overall picture that is filled with increasing detail, equally throughout the frame, as he continues.
Listening to it in the car during commutes is a great way to overcome the intimidation of its length. It gets done when it gets done. The book is primarily about the soviet system of work camps, but his social commentary is priceless. The way russian justice was systematically perverted is of particular relavence. The way in which the soviet government used 'the thieves' against the people inside and outside of the camps should be required reading if not the entire book.
Probably were released because of muh covid.
They have chosen to empower 'the thieves' and set them upon us. Then punish anyone who defends themselves.
How do they not fall off bridges randomly?
Because the people in power are pedos who don't want harsh penalties for kid diddling
If they are fine with with the 6+ pedos in their choir then as far as I'm concerned they are all pedos.
I definitely see your point, yet technically it would be to our advantage to divide them - This would be in line with a Sun Tzu gold standard victory. Also we dont know if they knew they had registered offenders..
Their clan should be divided and left looking inward to check for more pedo's, with minimum effort from us. Then they can't even do the usual victimhood tactic "Trump supporters were mean to us"
I know a pansexual/gay/lesbian/non-binary weirdo girl, she was opening up about her troubled time in school where she was mocked for being a lesbian (she's incredibly creepy and I assume that it was deserved). I mentioned a friends story about how he was mocked for being raped by a man when he was younger, and how teenage bullying is just bizarre and not something to worry about as a grown adult.
Then suddenly her brainwashed lefty mind started malfunctioning because I said a trigger phrase.
She starts getting angry and telling me that not all gay people are pedo's!!!! It's homophobic to mention that my friend was raped by a gay man! It pushes a false reality that gay people are more likely to be pedophiles!
My point is, there is no divide and conquer with these people. They all aggressively defend the lowest scum of the group and elevate them to the top. Some of them may feel a little bit weird about being around a pedo but if the rest of the group accepts them then their group identity mentality will kick in and they'll accept them too.
Stop believing that these people have the same morality as us.
Great comment. I disagree, but only partially. You don't know a 'pansexual' girl, you know a gay girl. Change my mind.
Trust me, she's not even that. She's never even kissed a girl. She's just a moron. But she gives herself 400 labels and reminds me every time I see her that I can call her a guy if I want...
Before all the woke s*** there was a divide between the gay community ann the trans Community because the truth is the trans Community has always targeted children, they were a major hindrance to the gay community and to the gay marriage ruling throughout the years and they were shunned by the Gay Community because of their intent to target kids at ages just where they are the most confused about their sexuality this is still the transexual way of multiplying and the Divide is real
Also the trans community has claimed the woke crown and womenists who won't suck on front-gash trans-man have been isolated and dismissed as TERFs (trans Exclusionary Radical Feminist)
the left's game is division and they are way over stretched and exposed , your comment is correct
This is the way
libs already are in support of pedophilia, they just don't openly do it because it's not convenient yet. you see this tactic of libs all the time in social media, where they inexplicably do a reverse on one of their beliefs. it's because it's indefensible and therefore inconvenient, so they just pretend they don't support it for that conversation. "nobody actually believes thing we literally all believe!"
Lies - that is their solution for memes too. We have memes that cut to the chase, left memes are designed to lie about what our positions are, so they have like maga with kkk hats etc.
Its true its true. Dont fall into that same hyperbolic nonsense
Liberals are not in support of pedophilia. Don't try to make ogres out of opposition
I know zero pedos and if you are friends with 1 you should be strung up
Let's say they didn't even all know about earlier convictions--and I doubt that because people talk. But just setting that aside for a moment. They were fine singing this song about kids ending with the line "We're coming for them" repeated over and over. They are trying to play off like the song is tongue in cheek but then the grand finale is a clear sexual innuendo about kids. Who would sing that?
This! It amazes me that not one of them thought "Maybe this song won't be received well"
Let's just cut to the chase here.
certainly some things need to be cut.
Not until the bodies stop wriggling in the wind.
I beg to differ... these convicted pedos should have something cut off before that. What's the point of castrating a pedo after it is dead?
The only time I wish I could be a man and meet one of these sick fucks
the roster page from their website is now gone
I'm shocked I tell you, I'm shocked!
Well, look at the bright side. By appearing in that video, the others have exposed themselves. (See what I did there? nudge nudge wink wink)
Please try to keep in mind that while there are some seriously sick, evil fucks out there, you can wind up on a list for doing something like tying your dog out for a couple of hours or peeing on the roadside.
I think the best thing one should do is 1) practice situational awareness; 2) talk to your kids -- we like to protect our children, but we should take a proactive stance and teach them to protect themselves ("don't talk to strangers" is a good rule); 3) show by your words/actions that you will not put up with any degenerate bullshit -- encourage your community to do the same, most of them feel the same way (there's a reason why drag queen story hour hasn't happened in some places).
Be aware that the sex offender registry can be used for things like getting drunk and pissing on a cop car. It's done purposefully to dilute it's usefulness and prevent people from using it as a list to punish pedos.
Sounds like you looked up actual cases though, so you've probably already done due diligence on that front.
Gay chorus is an oxymoron
As someone that happens to be a Maga gay dude, this crap really gets me. I told someone that I knew over a year ago after reading articles in the daily mail and from online websites overseas that they were going to push making pedophilia part of the gay community.
He said, “ I don’t think that’s going to happen, did you read that on some alt-right website ?” We no longer speak. ALL of these pedos need to be locked up. I don’t care what their orientation is. LET parents teach their kids about birds & bees, No sex Ed till high school, No children Drag queens/allowed in bars.
Someone earlier said that the pedo stuff is much more from the trans than the gay crowd. He stated it was a source of division between the gay and trans communities. Is this something you have observed?
Absolutely! It is really pissing me off that these "trans" fuckers have taken over the "gay community". They are not, and never will be a part of us as far as I'm concerned. Every time I bring it up with gay friends, I get the uncomfortable silence, and looks for I dare speak what they are all thinking but won't say out loud. The "T" is pushing the "P" to take the spotlight off of them. Sick fucks.
No, I haven’t actually observe this because I really don’t interact with the community much to be honest.
Thank you. I have been saying this too. The last real gay issue for us was for marriage equality. At the time, the big boogy man that kept getting trotted out was "what's next?". I argued repeatedly that there was no "next". How wrong I was. My husband and I have long since had nothing to do with "the community", and it pisses me off that we are lumped in with these idiots.
There are WAY more of us with this belief then the legacy media realizes
6 known offenders, how many still not caught?
This is our movements chance to turn the tables. All the time the left has been lying about us being "mUh kKk" - we can now authentically label them, in all honesty, as Pedo Enablers.
Six Sex Offendors
Five False Flags
Four Operation Mockingbirds
AND A FAKE INSURRECTION NARRATIVE!
Is this the start of P.W Chorus? lol
Hmm. Is 4chan more useful than the FBI?
Who would've guessed that a bunch of faggots singing about coming for you children would turn out to be a bunch of degenerates? I am Jack's total lack of surprise.
God bless the 4-chan savages and their weaponized autism.
In the letter to the choir, after they made the video "private" the author said.. "it's our turn".. I'm interpreting it as... the song is NOT a joke... it is a bold statement of fact... They are coming for innocent children.
A video made it's rounds awhile back where a dude was interviewing men at a gay nightclub and the majority said they first had sex or sexual contact with grown men between 6 and 12.. They were very nonchalant, as was the facebook page ( which I never used, saw the screenshots) of hundreds of men saying the same thing. Pederasty is how homos reproduce. "Born this way" is one of the biggest lies of the century.
I've know some gays who they hated faggotry more than anyone. They'd rather die than go to a gay club or fag parade.
You are completely right - about half of the picture. What you pointed out is a hideous social problem. That is the dark side of the coin.
By creationism of evolution - Gay men do tend to have feminine brain anatomy in primitive regions. So the bigger picture is probably a bit more complex.
The anti-faggotry gays I know were mostly molested as well, they just have the moral bearing to know how evil it is and that liking dick is not something to brag about or throw a parade over. In fact, all of the gay people I have been close with were sexually abused, just my experience. Hormones obviously play a big role in brain development, trannys tried to make "brain sex" a thing and it didn't stick. They took about a dozen brain scans of tranny brains, probably on female hormones for decades (was undisclosed) and said: Look we have lady brains! when the scans did show some feminized features. I don't believe they ever attempted it again, or publicized it, likely bc the ones not on female hormones had normal male brain structures. I have not heard of any studies showing gay men have feminized brains. If that was proven, it would be highly touted. I have not seen it personally.
Also, the brains of young people are extremely plastic, so Nurture also changes the physiology of the brain, neurons grow in different ways based on experience, which is likely happening in the brain's of children sexually abused. Nature and Nurture both have physiological effects on the developing mind, their particular effects can not be isolated, which is why I reject "Born the Way" as a trite cliche.
On the one hand, I am not about to invest hours into investigating gay brain science - however, I do believe a percentage are born that way based on the fact that we can all see that certain gay men do have a woman's eyes, an intangibly feminine set of characteristics specific to they eyes. Have you ever seen a gay guy with very feminine eyes? Your argument is a good one, the role of hormones in development - my counter argument is complimentary, yet I am also saying that there will be a percentage that have feminine hormones steering brain development as a function of their own developmental characteristics. Theoretically, after the sex of the child is determined at the moment of conception, the fetus is then subject to generally 9 months of the mothers womb, which may well be subject to a probable array of direct and indirect influences of the mothers hormones.
I am not disagreeing that hormones play an enormous role in utero and throughout lives. I am also saying that Nuture/experience can not be underplayed and that childhood sexual abuse changes the brain. I absolutely do disagree on "feminine eyes". I see plenty of very handsome men with pretty eyes and don't equate it with femininity or homosexuality.
One thing is for certain - the gang of convicted sex offenders has doubled down, reposted the video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ArOQF4kadHA and removed contact details from their website - archived as [email protected]
Hideous video, fantastic comments (blocked in 5, 4, 3. . . )
For political gays, "tolerance" never means tolerance. It means you will forced to tolerate being dominated, demeaned and disenfranchised (or you are a homophobic bigot).
ALWAYS ADD THE P!
Great thinking there fren. I like.
Gays make up 2% of the population, 45% of the pedophile offenders
This is why they want to sex ‘educate’ our kuds.
It's a joke guys! 🤡🌎
Well... That's like shooting fish in a pervert barrel, isn't it!?
I hope the SFGMC goes down in flames.
This surprise people here? Look i know some good gay men that think this is crazy shit and wish it would go away. The truth is there are sick people in this world. You sing about my kids, you've gone to far. I hope america is waking up.
All humans suck. Including me and definitely you!! Dont throw those stones to far. Might hit the house next door.
These kind of people don't "get better" they re-offend because being a pedophile is who they are. If you get caught assaulting a child, you should be done for life.
I wish he would have pointed this out about them .. but this is a developing story. https://youtu.be/ZqPI310fy44
REASON: FOR HARBORING PEDOPHILES AMONG THEM AND PROTECTING THEM
Name: Timothy Seelig
Artistic Director & Conductor
Address: 1712 Saddleback Dr, Daly City, CA 94014-3503
Name: Chris Verdugo
Address: 584 Castro St 169, San Francisco, CA 94114
Name: Ari Lipsky
Director of Development
Address: 1525 Delaware St, Berkeley, CA 94703-1281
BOARD OF DIRECTORS:
Name: Glenn DeSandre
Chair of the Board of Directors
Address: 1816 Schooldale Dr, San Jose, CA 95124-1136
Name: Paul Saccone
Vice Chair of the Board of Directors
Address: 3006 Market St, San Francisco, CA 94114-1825
Name: Monica MacMillan
Address: 2316 Easton Dr, Burlingame, CA 94010-5640
Name: Tom Paulino
Address: 1611 Haight St, San Francisco, CA 94117-2815
Name: Cammy Blackstone
Address: 2425 Yorba St, San Francisco, CA 94116-2846
Name: Bryan Blair
Address: 382 Alida Way Apt 112, South San Francisco, CA 94080-5914
Just had youtube throw me a suggestion about videos crushing random objects in a high pressure hydraulics.
I can think of a few more things I’d like to test out. For science.
Pedo hit squad ASSEMBLE!
...but that will just get us all labelled as terrorists. it will be used to say "see we where right"
I don't know, how many normal people will speak up to protect pedophiles.
Depends whether we are calling democrats 'normal people'...
Well that’s lower than I would have bet, but some just haven’t been caught yet I’m sure.
Let's do just a little mathematics.. There are 780,407 registered sex offenders in the United States. That's out of approximately 332, 504, 000 people in the U.S. Naturally, there are sex offenders who are not registered or convicted. That said, registered sex offenders make up 0.23% of the general U.S. population.
Let's compare that to the San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus. This image states that the chorus has nearly 300 active members. Let's round that up to 300 for convenience's sake. 6 out of 300 members is 2%. The San Francisco Gay Men's Chorus has nearly 10x the rate of registered sex offenders as the general population, and that's assuming that there are no other registered sex offenders in the chorus.
Good thinking. Apparently the gay community has a much higher percentage of sex offenders. Some have argued that these come, not from LGB, but almost exclusively from T
Honestly, I think that it's a combination. I've known people within the community, and they were people who would never dream of harming a child. That said, there seems to be an underlying attitude within much of the community that I like to call, "if it's gay, it's okay." Essentially, sexual contact between an adult and a minor (usually a teenager) is seen as a positive if it reinforces the minor's homosexuality. You may have noticed that a fair number of gay stories and movies portray adult/teen relationships. Call Me by Your Name immediately comes to mind. It's the not the most egregious example, but a relationship, even a fictional one, between a 17-year-old and a 24-year-old straight couple would raise some eyebrows.