4084
Comments (225)
sorted by:
339
Shwoogin 339 points ago +340 / -1

They don't even try, very flagrant and creepy.

Yes, it's 1.9 vs .1, and 1.9/.1 = 19, the stats and math are right... but it's false.

That's seriously insane. Very Orwellian,

The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command.

120
603win 120 points ago +120 / -0

Politico: “Math is racist, so if you don’t want to be a Trump-loving Bigot, shut up and put your mask back on”

64
DonJr2032 64 points ago +66 / -2

For those illiterate folks that haven't been enlightened, DoubleSpeak is a NewSpeak word from the book 1984. NewSpeak is a new language invented by the government, and being imposed on the citizens. DoubleSpeak means saying one thing and believing it, while simultaneously knowing that there is a contradiction and it's false.

31
Skogin 31 points ago +31 / -0

Yeah, but no, but yeah.

14
Steven_IDGAF_Miller 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's literally the grammatical equivalent of 2+2=5, and believing that any other answer is false.

If you haven't read 1984, Atlas Shrugged, Animal Farm...hurry and do so.

I read all of them when I was in my teens and early twenties and you never look at the world or politics in the same way again.

9
TrustTheTruth 9 points ago +9 / -0

The godfather of Doublespeak William Lutz was educated and trained in Racine, Wisconsin, and at nearby Jesuit institution Marquette,

Racine is the birthplace of modern publishing and propaganda, and the model for the real agenda beyond 21 and 2030.

Expose the “root” - Racine.

9
Meme_Too 9 points ago +9 / -0

I've heard about Racine. But why Racine? Just because it derives from "root?" Is there something special about the town, other than it's name?

6
TrustTheTruth 6 points ago +7 / -1

It is the most powerful and globally influential city in America, and has been for generations. Many of the most important decisions and model programs have been made in Racine. It is beneath everyone’s radar by design since it was once the model industrious city and Invention Capital of the World.

Its true significance goes much deeper however to ancient civilizations.

5
Meme_Too 5 points ago +5 / -0

Got any sources for that? Wikipedia says there were Native American settlements at the Root River watershed thousands of years ago, but when and why did it supposedly take on a deeper significance?

-1
TrustTheTruth -1 points ago +2 / -3

Racine and southeast Wisconsin are the gateway to the Path of Souls as the closest point on Earth to through Orion and the center of the Milky Way.

Some of the most ancient civilizations are also from Wisconsin.

The history of the area is also closely connected with Aztalan and cannibalism. Wisconsin is the most evil state you will find for this and many other reasons.

https://buffalonews.com/lifestyles/picnic-with-cannibals-at-wisconsin-s-aztalan-state-park/article_e4da8476-47a6-5688-a0c7-49aa75395678.html

Kabbalah, Freemasonry, Scientology, OTO and Rotary are all closely connected with the Path of Souls and Racine. It has been the most globally influential city in America for generations since originally controlled by the Astors.

Fred Gates is another key advisor who helped build their agenda using science, industry and philanthropy after he met his second wife and handler in Racine to become Rockefeller’s most trusted advisor.

This is Operation Lockstep.

2
Friendly_B 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh? Tell me more.

3
Klown_Schwab 3 points ago +5 / -2

take your meds shizo

4
TrustTheTruth 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can easily confirm William Lutz’s history without medication or multiple personalities.

What is dissociative identity disorder, how does it relate to pizzagate, and why do you quickly turn to ad hominem?

We care more about your Soul than you do.

4
IeatCrakerzNbed 4 points ago +4 / -0

AKA Hegelian Dialect

48
Patriot_Lettuce 48 points ago +48 / -0

Summary: "It's true, but we don't like it, so we're rating this fact as mostly false."

31
deleted 31 points ago +31 / -0
12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
6
JiXinping 6 points ago +6 / -0

Fuck reddit. Everyone's on there is an autist who just wants to argue.

3
IeatCrakerzNbed 3 points ago +5 / -2

Autistic people have zero capacity for abstract reasoning and operate purely on logic and proven working models. I'd pick a different condition to use for insulting people's intelligence, they have to modify the Sanford Sachs IQ test results for High Functioning autistics using division, not subtraction. Meaning their reasoning and logic is exponentially greater. But the drawbacks are basically social retardation and anxiety, and a 'flatter' personality.

Just a few factoids for ya. The ASD has 2 poles- dysfunctional and high functioning atypical.

Not all autistics are Rain main, Nikola Tesla was on the high functioning end of the spectrum.

2
JiXinping 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is actually really informative. Thanks for the info.

3
IeatCrakerzNbed 3 points ago +3 / -0

Np I think that's why the pedes stopped using it as an insult and started using it as a badge of honor. Look up Hanz Asperger and what he was doing with High Functioning atypical Aspies in the NAZI party. He was exploiting their traits and the ,"adaptive savant capabilities" and setting them loose in the STEM fields. Ppl still to this day claim Hitler was getting information from aliens because of how much advancement they gained from putting autists under the leading scientists and engineers.

A lot of the records for the shit are still as lost to our government as Tesla's life's records, notes, etc. Not unlike the patent wars.

1
PosterIsDead 1 point ago +1 / -0

Half?

1
DonJr2024 1 point ago +2 / -1

"It's true but does not spread fear so it must somehow be false. Give us time dammnit"

12
GeoG85 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yea but anyone with a Calculator can check their work and see they're full of shit.

6
ufkyflflfguio 6 points ago +6 / -0

How soon before those start giving wrong answers too?

5
Tejanopede 5 points ago +5 / -0

“Check it out. Put any problem into this calculator, and the answer will be RACISM.”

-Clown World, 2022

2
VirtueVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't give Loudoun County any ideas

2
DonJr2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Well we need long term studies on those who have gotten delta"

Sure.. and hey let's study the vaccines a little closer while we're at it.

7
CBing 7 points ago +7 / -0

Math is racist tho

3
Flipakademsarepedos 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep!!!!!!! No bias whatsoever am I right? They need to be asked about this immediately. It is true but they say mostly false bc it’s politically convenient smfh!!!!!

118
BabbleRabble 118 points ago +118 / -0

"our ruling". get fucked.

50
Tramsec 50 points ago +50 / -0

PolitiFACT: Here is our opinion

6
bigdickhangsright 6 points ago +6 / -0

Here is our lie by omission.

18
bidensmissingbrain 18 points ago +18 / -0

My thoughts exactly. "Our take" or "our verdict" would be much more appropriate. Awful lot of hubris to take the overtly authoritarian "our ruling" for a website that has absolutely zero actual authority.

2
DonJr2024 2 points ago +3 / -1

My ruling would involve a cheese grater, hot sauce and the exposed flesh of those politi-faggots.

70
IncredibleMrE1 70 points ago +70 / -0

Doublespeak is exactly what this is. They aren't even trying to hide it.

13
kernel 13 points ago +13 / -0

they can't hide it anymore

8
phandaal 8 points ago +8 / -0

Like Bowling for Soup said: The story never changes, just the names and faces.

56
UndercoverSpez 56 points ago +56 / -0

Covid's death rate is overblow. CDC came out recently and said only 1 in 4 cases were even reported.

I doubt they put that into the Covid mortality rate.

https://archive.ph/G1sUi

28
_Sully_ 28 points ago +28 / -0

So not only is what they said insane but it's totally wrong. The death rate isn't close to 1.9%. It's likely not even 0.07%. The real kick in the teeth in all this is if covid is killing people it is likely that only certain people are actually vulnerable to it. They refuse to actually acknowledge this because then they'd have to admit that most people have ZERO chance of dying from it, not just an extremely lose chance but no chance whatsoever.

4
peterstrzoked 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m not sure how that could ever be proven/disproven without being able to link covid death exclusively to a specific gene or trait (or some varied number of combos of specific genes/traits)

That may very well be true, but unless you can go get tested for some marker(s) to know whether you have zero risk or not, you still have the unknown 0.01% or whatever chance of dying if you haven’t already had it and recovered.

2
Herecomedatpresident 2 points ago +2 / -0

What is most upsetting about this, well there are so many things, but ONE super upsetting thing is that there is clearly some genetic marker or blood type that is making some people super vulnerable. But in the zeal to declare this thing a global catastrophe they cannot allow serious large scale inquiry into what that is or what the combination is. Yes we all know super old or super unhealthy people are at risk but there are some weird cases of somewhat people getting super sick (i know one) and couples where one gets it and is fine and the other one dies. Is no one interested in why?? Wtf!

2
WhiskeyDreams 2 points ago +3 / -1

They also said that only 6% of the deaths are from COVID.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
0
bighomiebeenchillin 0 points ago +1 / -1

it’s like this for literally every disease. like obviously if you never go to the doctor and officially get tested, you will never know for sure what disease you have and will never actually be officially counted in the system. this is why death rates for all diseases is tracked by two different methods. case fatality and infection fatality.

case fatality is the total number of cases which died from the disease. infection fatality is an estimate based on all cases PLUS everyone else that got infected with the disease, but never actually got tested and counted as a case.

you cant be a case unless you actually get officially tested. the number of people that get tested for any disease is always lower than the total number of infections for that disease, since people only get tested if they’re sick enough to go to actually go to the doctor and get tested. most people that catch the flu or common cold get mild to moderate symptoms and simply just stay home for a few days and recover. they never went to the doctor, never got tested, and never got officially counted in the system as having caught the disease.

so by definition, the case fatality rate is always higher because the number of deaths is the same, but there are less cases. so the % of case deaths is higher. with infection fatality, there are way more people that are included in da calculation but the # of deaths is the same obviously. so it’s a smaller %.

if there are 1000 cases and 10000 infections, with 100 deaths from a particular disease, the case fatality rate would be 1% and the infection fatality rate would be 0.1%.

so what’s the true death rate of the disease? 1% or 0.1%? obviously 0.1% is a better measure of how deadly a disease is, because those 9000 people that caught the disease but never got tested as a case doesn’t mean they never had the disease lmao they still had the fucking disease ffs. and out of all of the people that had the disease, case or no case, 100 of them died.

41
RandoTexasDude 41 points ago +42 / -1

This is why I view Branch Covidians as literal subhumans now. If they willingly believe this kind of bullshit, they're too stupid to be human.

10
phandaal 10 points ago +11 / -1

Most of the essential qualities that differentiate humans from other primates are in our minds.

So yes, these mush-brains are subhuman in a very real sense.

3
JudicialDredd 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mask Covidians will come a knockin'

2
Nagatoro 2 points ago +2 / -0

These "Branch Covidians" you speak of are the people that enable the Biden regime to go door-to-door forcing vaccines onto the unwilling. So yeah, subhuman scum.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
30
Gnometard 30 points ago +30 / -0

1.9% fatality rate? No way. Well over 100 people got it at work and only 1 person got seriously ill

26
Kingofkek 26 points ago +26 / -0

Case fatality rate . Meaning only the people who get treated for it . So significantly lower than the infection mortality rate

8
kernel 8 points ago +8 / -0

And even the official CFR for Delta in UK for under 50yo is 0.02%

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

What defines a case?

At least half actually got sick to some extent.

1
bighomiebeenchillin 1 point ago +2 / -1

not treated, but officially tested by their doctor and put into da database of having caught da disease. half da time you go to da doctor when you’re sick, you aren’t even tested. you get some otc treatment or prescription based on da symptoms you got and are sent on your way.

if you aren’t tested and officially confirmed to have a certain disease, you literally cannot be a case because without an actual test, nobody knows if your symptoms are caused by a flu strain, a common cold strain, malaria, or any other fucking disease. if you ain’t tested for a particular disease, you are an infection, not a case. infections are a total estimate of everybody who has caught that particular disease, which also includes cases.

in short, all cases are infections, but not all infections are cases.

either way, the deaths stay the same. anyone wanna take a guess which metric leftists and media use to determine the death rate lmao? case fatality or infection fatality? which one gives a scarier percentage, despite being based on da same exact number of deaths?

1
Gnometard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fun story:

I failed the temperature check at work and was sent home. I work nights so I had to get tested the next day.

Woke up feeling kind of sick, and got tested.

Negative for covid.

"It's just the flu"

"Are you going to test me?"

And I got a look like I'm crazy. Had to ask for a dr note too!!

1
current_horror 1 point ago +1 / -0

They calculated flu death rates using IFR every year for the last 50+ years.

They calculated covid-19 death rates using CFR. This exaggerated the death rate by a factor of probably 10.

Healthcare agencies and industries have revealed themselves as no less corrupt than every other government and business institution.

0
bighomiebeenchillin 0 points ago +1 / -1

exactly. there’s a reason they did it differently for covid. because the case fatality ratio is about 1.5%, while the infection fatality is less than 0.5%.

and they hardly even mentioned da actual case fatality rate in the first place. they always just say “cases are rising omg” and indirectly imply that this is bad because da death rate must be high enough to warrant da panic.

19
Tdr287 19 points ago +19 / -0

This is why they don't teach math

15
Keiichi81 15 points ago +15 / -0

You just don't understand the correct order of operations. /s

8
Recyclops 8 points ago +8 / -0

Timely and appropriate. 😄

1
MaximusOrwellius 1 point ago +1 / -0

The order: start with the truth and end with a lie.

12
AlexWin1939 12 points ago +12 / -0

LOL Well the difference is a factor of 19 like the report says but REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE we dont like that so MOSTLY FALSE.

10
TheFreeSpeechRadical 10 points ago +10 / -0

Our Ruling?! Who are you suckers and who fucking gave you authority to have ruling?!?!?! These people have to be stopped and prosecuted for usurping power!

5
logan34 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our Ruling is 3 fat low IQ purple haired degenerates deciding what they want to push for an agenda.

9
Mrsattorney 9 points ago +9 / -0

Huh?

7
President_Elect_Pepe 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is one thing about Trump winning which I really appreciated.

Before 2016 there were journalist outlets crawling all over each other to set up to be fact checkers and be gatekeepers of truth. Getting paid to tell us how to think.

Hillary freaking reached out before one of the debates appealing to them. The writing was on the wall. This was going to be the new normal. Self appointed idiots with barely an education telling the masses what was right and wrong.

Trump winning out an end to that as it begin. The reason politifact publishes this now is because the aren’t fact checking. They are just publishing materials relevant to what their readers want in order to maintain an income stream.

Nobody on the center or right takes them seriously so they are both comfortable with and financially required to write falsehoods.

2
Beeferson 2 points ago +2 / -0

didn't killary quote snopes in one of the debates? ahaha might as well quote babylon bee

6
stick_in_the_eye 6 points ago +6 / -0

politfact is cnn.

5
chickeninoven 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our ruling: Although the stated facts are true, I just farted so we will call this mostly false.

5
Badstate 5 points ago +5 / -0

Literally true == mostly false.

What year is it again?

4
bonejack 4 points ago +4 / -0

1984

5
Forty_Five 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's a safe bet to assume the exact opposite of everything said by a politician, the MSM, and their "fact" checking sites.

4
logan34 4 points ago +4 / -0

EXACTLY the truth is the opposite of what they WANT you to believe 100% of the time

5
bejeavis 5 points ago +5 / -0

noah get the helicopter

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
RachetQueen2020 4 points ago +4 / -0

I would love to start making a list and a chart of all the people who work for "fact checkers". Just because.

4
AmannamedRJ 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yes its true, but the agency says no. Mostly False.

This reads right out of 1984. It actually hurts.

4
CovfefeAnon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Democide is much worse.

4
Pirate_Lafitte 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is why I stopped paying attention to fact checkers long ago

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
412LibertyDotcom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol "our ruling." Fucking faggots

3
ARfreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

The Babylon Bee satire about the fact checker's "false for now" has come true.

3
BloodDe 3 points ago +3 / -0

So it’s not even a cold

3
CMDRConanAAnderson 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's only not dangerous when they say it's safe. How lethal it is is irrelevant.

3
Wtf_socialismreally 3 points ago +3 / -0

"It's not 19 times less, it's less by a factor of 19!"

God save us if we don't stop this soon

3
2
bigmikesballsack [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice find.

3
taranchocalypse 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people don’t engage in providing facts. Maybe they did at one time. All they do now is muddle the facts so they can claim one story is the one to believe. Every fucking thing is trying to push leftist bullshit. It wouldn’t be that bad if they were accurate, but they are so often maliciously incorrect. How much of the world actually believes this shit? How much of what we see is actually just controlled by the people pulling strings? Polls are fucked, media’s fucked, fact checks are fucked. Reality is entirely what we are told it is, not what we can see it is. This alone should be some of the most concerning shit to everyone.

3
Gadsden 3 points ago +3 / -0

So it's true, but they say mostly false.

Literally agreed in their own words, then said false.

This is where we are, now. Wow.

3
one_cool 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is like the typical vax discussion

1: why won't you get the vax?

2: how many have died from the vax?

1: you won't die from it

2: cdc says over 5000 deaths

1: those are not true because they haven't been investigated

2: so investigate them and tell me how many died

1: none because they haven't been investigated! Its perfectly safe

2: i'll wait for the investigations

Etc, etc, etc

3
BreadPitt 3 points ago +3 / -0

rofl. I could make the argument that says the delta variant may be equally deadly to the original coronavirus. theyre not gonna like it though. here goes

The delta variant is equally deadly to the original coronavirus. however since whitmer and cuomo (among others) already killed off the vulnerable population the statistical evidence only leads you to believe its less deadly

1
Hattmall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I could see that as a reasonable caveat to include is this article or that since vaccination rates are higher in older people more younger people get delta and then are less likely to have a serious case due to being younger.

2
_soundwave_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL. That’s fucking ridiculous.

2
Sclerotia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds mostly true, even by their reasoning that it's mostly false.

2
bonejack 2 points ago +2 / -0

Look, it may seem like it isn't bad. But that is because some people can't do basic order of operations math.

2
current_horror 2 points ago +2 / -0

Journalism 2: The Fact Checkinging

Please Believe Us Again

2
Light_HIV_Effect 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democracy needs journalism. Journalism needs Poynter.

What a fucking joke. There was a time when the Tampa Bay Times (now owned by Poynter) was respected, but that was a long, long time ago.

2
Michigan 2 points ago +2 / -0

New math. 19 does NOT equal 19. To assume otherwise makes you a bigot.

2
Gerbaski 2 points ago +2 / -0

They will do anything to support the narrative, Tovarish. We have always been at war with Eastasia...

2
BoughtByBloomberg2 2 points ago +2 / -0

You all don't get it. It's mostly false simple as!

Cause by the end it'll be 35 times lower cause time = more cases with less deaths.

2
multithreaded 2 points ago +2 / -0

This true data identifies as false.

2
BigHandsome91 2 points ago +2 / -0

They said it's false so it's false.

2
Smithereens 2 points ago +2 / -0

LMAO SHAMELESS

'Its true but it goes against our fearmongering narrative'

Mostly false btw 🤣👌🤦‍♂️

2
Rainman 2 points ago +2 / -0

So in other words...

The post was true but we're going to say it's mostly false so stupid people won't believe it

2
QueensOwn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don’t you dare spread or sight the correct numbers! We need you to stay afraid you filthy peasants! /s

2
NvJohansson 2 points ago +2 / -0

PolitiFact knows more about English variant fatality rates than English doctors and scientists? So now we're supposed to trust the science, unless it's overruled by some blue-haired faget fact-checking from his basement?

2
LugNuts 2 points ago +2 / -0

This can't be real.

2
Ebbie8708 2 points ago +2 / -0

19? Like COVID-19? Lol

2
WiseDonkey 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is the 1.9% number based on the number of cases and the 0.1% number based on the number of infections (comparing apples and oranges)? 1.9% sounds awfully high.

2
itsdangerous 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's likely 1.9% of hospitalized patients because they needed full sequencing for each in the source pdf.

2
vongregormench 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you're right then we need to wait to find more data that proves you wrong later. If your numbers are slightly off then you are wrong and should be banned from the internet forever.