2069
Trump never did (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by I-am-Orlando ago by I-am-Orlando +2069 / -0
Comments (35)
sorted by:
41
hansgruber7 41 points ago +41 / -0

If I hear one more "conservative" refer to it as a "riot" I'm going to lose it. Stop using their bullshit terminology to endorse their lies.

21
GhostPepperedLabia 21 points ago +21 / -0

Continually letting them dictate the language is one of the reasons we keep getting our ass handed to us.

3
Bernieisacuck 3 points ago +3 / -0

How do you fix it. Even the most astute person is ok with changing the 200 year old definition of “vaccine” how can you expect them to care about minor language

1
GhostPepperedLabia 1 point ago +1 / -0

Beyond actively policing your own speech to not give them an extra voice, you can always call out others for propagating it, though that will not make you any friends.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

We just need to all refuse to use their false terms. I refer to it as an experimental injection.

2
TheWinningNeverStops 2 points ago +2 / -0

Language is important it's why these Marxist try so hard to keep changing terminology.

1
Bundari 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was going to say the same thing, this is why we lose!

-1
Cutter -1 points ago +4 / -5

The problem with knee-jerk reactions is they bypass the thinking parts of the brain.

I agree 100% if you're referring to January 6th, but nothing in the post alludes to it referring to the DC incident. There WERE numerous riots across the country, and I'm sure more than one granny participated.

Perhaps instead of telling people to stop doing something you disagree with or don't understand, ask them to explain WHY they are doing it.

4
hansgruber7 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's clearly referring to Jan 6. There is no record of a granny being thrown in jail for any other "riot." Not even the arsonists at BLM riots were thrown in jail, let alone grannies. It's clear as day he's referring to Jan 6. C'mon man.

1
anotherthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

He needs to refer to it as what it was, a rally. There's no more accurate word than that.

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, I'm ok with protest too as that's accurate.

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

January 6th is the only time they threw grannies in jail.

-1
Paxelmania -1 points ago +1 / -2

How do we define a riot, I guess is the question.

Like obviously a single person acting out shouldn't qualify, but what % of a crowd, and how do we weigh that % ?

1
hansgruber7 1 point ago +1 / -0

If BLM all summer was not a riot, then they don't get to call anything else a riot no matter what happens.

11
OneBigMaga 11 points ago +11 / -0

What riot is this idiot talking about? He also seems to think creepy Joe is president. This guy is clearly a clueless grifter, just like most conservatives on twitter.

2
DJ_NeckFace 2 points ago +2 / -0

Twitter is all bots.

2
SPEDMan64 2 points ago +3 / -1

He put president in quote marks, dude. Learn to comprehend.

1
OneBigMaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

The proper term is former vice president.

4
phandaal 4 points ago +4 / -0

Two things.

One: It wasn't a riot.

Two: I am not one the thieves who faked our election. I feel no shame. I feel anger.

3
Rubicante 3 points ago +3 / -0
  • Threaten American citizens with nuclear weapons

  • Purposefully sabotage U.S. oil independence

  • Operate gulags and re-education centers

  • Carryout a Stalin-esque purge of the military

  • I could literally keep going for an hour just off the top of my head

2
FloridaDude 2 points ago +2 / -0

He’s not our president, he’s a Globalist put in fraudulently. George Washington warned us about getting entangled with foreign entities. Politicians and bureaucrats have sold themselves and our country out to these foreign entities. Their allegiance is with Globalism.

We need strong Nationalist countries seeking their independence and sovereignty, that’ll save this planet from a global tyranny.

MAGA SAVE AMERICA

2
Rageofpepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ll never be ashamed of my President Donald J.Trump. The duly elected President .

2
MontanaRanger5150 2 points ago +2 / -0

1 More

X Concede the 2020 Election

2
CommieCrats 2 points ago +2 / -0

#PUNKED!

2
Kashim11 2 points ago +2 / -0

He isn't my president.

3
OneBigMaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

He isn't anyone's president.

1
Vortmak 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't feel shame for they don't have any. Feel repulsive

1
someschmuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Trump also never ruled by Executive order. Biden does since he knows his rollbacks would be downvoted by both democrats (because they made them rich) and Republicans (it made them and their constituents rich) and he clearly doesn't trust the house or even Kamala's tie breaking vote in the senate.

1
ChonkFingers 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wasn’t a riot, it was a mostly peaceful protest that would have been entirely peaceful if not for FBI working with Antifa to frame the grand.

1
notCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck you. We didn't elect the motherfucker. I doubt feel shame for opposing an evil, foreign invasion.

1
Nunyo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just to be clear: Jim Crow laws were actual democrat laws.

1
Asael 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at your 'president' and feel shame, America.

Oh believe you me, anyone that actually voted for him will do no such thing. Only thing those people understand is the guy with my political brand "won."

1
Paxelmania 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't agree with you, we had that poll for example of people who said they regretted voting for Biden and wouldn't have voted for him if they'd known about the Laptop From Hell.

So there's at least a minority of lamenting Biden voters we should not be demonizing.

I think it was something like 10% though so the majority are still scum

1
Asael 1 point ago +1 / -0

But yet you are agreeing with me in the overall general sense only to disagree on an asinine detail.

The mass majority will do no such thing outside of a niche arbitrary percentage. In the grand scheme of things from where I'm standing my initial post holds true outside of your specific point.

In other words, my statement is not meant to be interpreted as some end all be all absolute fact. Would figure that would just go without saying.

1
MobileDev4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0

Start a new war