3246
Audit Updates 7/23/21 ⭐   TRUMP WON   ⭐
posted ago by ProfessorOak ago by ProfessorOak +3249 / -3

GROUPS FIGHTING FOR ELECTION INTEGRITY

 


 

SIGN THESE PETITIONS, AFFIDAVITS, AND RECALLS BEFORE THEIR DEADLINES

 


 

Have Family, Friends, or Acquaintances Facing Charges for Jan 6th? This group on Discord might be able to help!

 


UPDATES

ALL

  • How Do Grand Juries Work? (7/23)

https://www.evansfirm.com/criminal-law/grand-jury-procedure/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1nrtDjl4Xeg

 


  • Lots of Events Tomorrow (7/23)

https://patriots.win/p/12jccgurTz/july-24-events/

 


  • MUST READ: Voting Machine Companies Are Members of EISCC! (7/22)

I found this last night and just skimmed it, but I’m going to have to go through this whole series.

https://patelpatriot.substack.com/p/devolution-part-5

 


ARIZONA

  • RIGGED AZ REDISTRICTING ALERT (7/23)

From EZAZ.org telegram:

Mesa Community College announced they have partnered with radical leftist organizations featuring communist symbology in their branding to train their college students on how to manipulate the redistricting process. Mesa Community College is paying students $200 to create community of interest maps which the IRC uses to define new boundaries. These boundaries are effective for a decade and will directly impact the outcomes of future elections.

Why is Mesa Community College partnering with such radicals to work against their own community's voice?

Contact Maricopa County Governing Board Members and tell them to back off on using taxpayer funding to rig our redistricting.

👉Governing Board: 480-731-8889

👉 District 1, Jacqueline Smith

[email protected]

Phone: 480-731-8889

👉 At Large Member, Linda Thor

[email protected]

Phone: 480-731-8889

 


  • Options for the AZ Senate – MCBOS Must Be Held Accountable (7/23)

From Arizona Red Roots:

For the Senate to obtain the remaining items from the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors, they can:

  1. File a Motion to Compel and Motion for Sanctions for Non-Compliance of the Legislative Subpoena with Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Thomason (The Board sued the Senate in Superior Court, Judge Thomason presided over this case and his ruling was the subpoenas were legal and enforceable). If the Judge grants the Motion, he may order the enforcement of the subpoena due to the outstanding circumstances. If the Board then chooses not to comply with the court, they may be held in contempt.

  2. Issue a Warrant. The Judiciary Committee Chairman, Senator Warren Petersen, can write a written report, which can be signed off on by Senate President Fann, to then send a Sergeant at Arms to pick up the remaining equipment; and/or take over Maricopa County Tabulation and Election Center. This does not require any type of vote and is outlined in the Arizona Senate Rules. Josh Barnett and Attorney Alexander Kolodin have spread awareness on this and are working to speak with Legislators about it.

  3. File a formal complaint with the Attorney General’s office to initiate action and open an investigation into the Maricopa County Board of Supervisors and their non-compliance of our State Legislature.

  4. Issue new subpoenas with a deadline requirement and outline enforcement of the Subpoena if there is non-compliance.

It is not the time to give up, nor is it the time to pretend Paul Boyer is our “only hope.” The next time a Senator mentions decertification or the hold-up with the Board, ask them to pursue another option – immediately.

Know that some Senators are on board with these options, and there are some who need a little push. Contact them, let them know you support them in finishing the job and holding the Board accountable!

 

More info & link to Senate contact info for #1: https://t.me/ArizonaRedRoots/1538

More info & link to Senate contact info for #2: https://t.me/ArizonaRedRoots/1666 (Gail Golec is interviewing Attorney Kolodin 7/22 evening, see post https://t.me/ArizonaRedRoots/1701)

More info & link to Senate contact info for #3: https://t.me/ArizonaRedRoots/1629

#4 Contact info for the Senate: https://t.me/ArizonaRedRoots/1457

 


  • Paul Boyer Needs to Be Recalled (7/23)

If anyone finds a recall effort for Boyer, let u/War_Hamster know. We'll need 25,198 signatures to kick him to the curb. If no group steps up and you're up to the task, we might be able to figure something out.

This group just attempted a large recall and Boyer was one of the politicians they were trying to get recalled.

https://wethepeopleazalliance.com/

They still have up the form they used:

https://wethepeopleazalliance.com/recalls

They might be willing to let another group use their documents or explain how to conduct a recall if you contact them.

 


GEORGIA

  • DEMOCRATS RUNNING AS REPUBLICANS IN GA (7/23)

https://www.georgiarecord.com/landmark-communications-the-republican-political-consulting-firm-in-atlanta-that-runs-democrats-as-republicans-some-with-ties-to-chinese-communist-party/

Neil Johnson found this article and is trying to get the word out:

https://odysee.com/@LumberjackLogic:c/true-bombshell-out-of-ga!:4

 

If you want to dig into this a bit more, we’ve got a thread dedicated to this particular story:

https://patriots.win/p/12jccgurgI/democrats-running-as-republicans/c/


  • Georgia Mailed Out 7 Million Absentee Ballot Requests in 2020 Election (7/23)

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/07/georgia-mail-7-million-ballots-2020-election-state-5-6-million-registered-voters/

 


  • Grand Jury Has Heard Evidence and Voted (7/23)

From Kandiss Taylor:

Grand jury heard the petition this morning and voted. They were still in session late tonight, so it’ll be the morning before we get the answer. Continue to pray!

 


  • Kemp Appoints Judge with Ties to AG Carr to Court of Appeals (7/23)

https://nationalfile.com/georgia-kemp-appoints-anti-trump-judge-likely-to-throw-out-any-2020-fraud-cases-draws-ire-from-grassroots/

 


  • Keep the Pressure on GA (7/23)

VoterGA and Kandiss have presented plenty of evidence. In case we weren’t clear enough, we want a FULL FORENSIC AUDIT conducted by an independent third party such as Jovan Hutton Pulitzer, Col. Phil Waldron, Cyber Ninjas, or Allied Security Operations Group. No GBI involvement.

 

Senator Marty Harbin

Capitol: (404) 656-0078

District: (404) 656-0078

[email protected]

 

Senator Burt Jones

Capitol: (404) 656-0082

District: (770) 775-4880

[email protected]

 

Senator Brandon Beach

Capitol: (404) 463-1378

District: (678) 640-1811

[email protected]

 

Senate President pro Tempore Butch Miller:

Capitol: (404) 656-6578

[email protected]

 

Speaker David Ralston

[email protected]

Office: (404) 656-5020

 

The rest of the legislators:

https://populistrevolt.com/georgia/

 


MICHIGAN

  • Stay on MI (7/23)

Things have been relatively quite in MI lately. Let them know we haven’t forgotten about them. We want a FULL FORENSIC AUDIT!

Sen. Mike Shirkey:

(517) 373-5932

[email protected]

 

Sen. Ed McBroom:

(517) 373-7840

[email protected]

 

Other legislators’ phone numbers and emails:

https://t.me/MichiganAudit/114

https://t.me/MichiganAudit/113

https://populistrevolt.com/michigan/

 


PENNSYLVANIA

  • Mastriano Responds to SOS Threats (7/23)

https://senatormastriano.com/2021/07/22/senator-mastriano-response-to-the-latest-bully-tactics-by-the-wolf-administration/

 


WISCONSIN

  • HOT Wisconsin Releasing Racine FIOA Requests (7/23)

HOT Wisconsin will releasing all open records information they receive from the City of Racine and Racine County as they become available.

You can find the dropbox link on their website:

https://www.hotgovernment.com/

Comments (215)
sorted by:
80
Vermin 80 points ago +82 / -2

This informative post needs to be stickied every day until the next one is released. Thank you for your work, Professor.

28
FuckingWiseCracker 28 points ago +28 / -0

I should have read the comments before posting. I just said the same thing. Apologies. Enjoy your day, Fren.

22
Vermin 22 points ago +22 / -0

I think it is great you said the same thing. The more of us asking for Professor's work to stay stickied, the better chance to get it done.
Have a great weekend! 😃

18
FarmerWithAPitchfork 18 points ago +21 / -3

Yes, I agree. This post is our battle cry. It's what I copy and forward to other platforms, and chat groups. I have stickers out in the wild with this site address...and constantly am referring people here (my realtor kept making GEOTUS wink the other day haha) To someone who is opening the site for the first time ...even though our stickied memes and sarcasm are gold...it would be beneficial for them to read our serious work first...what they need to do to help save the Republic. Also, some non tech folks need to learn how to browse the site, but red stickies stand out and most likely are the first to get clicked. HMMM maybe a "New to the Site? What you need to know" post? Idk...just throwing some thoughts out there.

9
Vermin 9 points ago +9 / -0

I really like that.

I agree the audit should be out there first.
The serious side.
We can take them to see the fun stuff a little later on.

I like your plan of action to get the word out about the website.
Very nice indeed.

I am sure someone has done this before but those of us that go to gun shows, etc. We should be armed with information on how to get to patriots.

As well as triggering random lefty folks when they run across stickers for the site in the wild. 👿 Deep inside enemy lines, this thought amuses me to no end.

You had a great time at the realtor.
That was lucky to get a good one.

Congrats on buying or selling your home.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
FuckingWiseCracker 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cheers, Fren!!

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
15
War_Hamster 15 points ago +17 / -2

Red State writer, San Diego's own Stu Cvrk has been writing a series of audit update summaries. Here's one from today that is very much worth the read:

https://redstate.com/stu-in-sd/2021/07/23/a-u-d-i-t-of-elections-grassroots-pressure-begins-to-pay-off-n414846

Here's a snippet:

<<<11,326. A seemingly random number. A unique, specific number. So what’s in a number? 11,326.

That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in Maricopa County, AZ in the 2020 election.

That’s the exact number of people who illegally voted, had their votes counted, and added to the certified election results in AZ.

11,326. That’s the exact number of UNREGISTERED people who voted in AZ in Maricopa County and DID NOT APPEAR on any AZ voter rolls on 11/6/2021, but magically appeared on AZ voting rolls a month later.

Let me break down what that means:

11,326 people who weren’t registered voted in AZ illegally. Someone found this, and found they were not on the voting rolls.

Someone then added them to the voting rolls a month later, to try to cover this up & hide it.

The ONLY people who can change voting rolls is a state’s secretary of state.

Katie Hobbs. Soros bought & paid for Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs.

The same Katie Hobbs trying to stop the #AZaudit

You know what this shows?

  1. Knowledge of the votes & no action taken to remove them from results.
  2. Knowledge that someone was looking into it.
  3. A DELIBERATE attempt to cover it up by illegally altering state records.>>>
7
SurfingUSA 7 points ago +7 / -0

^ OK that is a loaded missile into this nest of rats.

And Karen Fann & the Gang better make some heads roll.

6
PorchLightOn 6 points ago +6 / -0

I want Brnovich to be on this the minute the report is released. Liz Harris's canvassing team also turned up instances of changes being made to the voter rolls. That's a normal process, but every change is supposed to be explained with a date and reason for the change. As I recall, her team found changes made with no explanation.

Those changes were willfully made by some human being, and that should be pursued.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed. Same thing with the voter roll changes post election in GA.

12
FuckingWiseCracker 12 points ago +12 / -0

Aha, the most important post of the day! Every day. Everything else is smoke and mirrors. This should be stickied at the top all day, every day. Thanks, Professor Oak, and best wishes!

11
rainyday1234 11 points ago +13 / -2

ADUDIT ALL 50

11
rainyday1234 11 points ago +14 / -3

do you when the az audit is set to end oh and its ok if you don't know

19
ProfessorOak [S] 19 points ago +20 / -1

u/ShyRipley had a good comment on it yesterday: https://patriots.win/p/12jcY72tDI/x/c/4JBvq3iR54a

Unfortunately, it look like there's still no specific date. We're expecting sometime in August, but the Board of Supervisors' delay tactics aren't helping things.

5
QLARP 5 points ago +5 / -0

What will the routers show?

7
Xuvial 7 points ago +7 / -0

No idea. Routers don't store any actual data, they don't carry logs from months ago, and it's impossible to tell whether a router has internet connectivity just by physically obtaining it and looking at the config. If those routers are in production by the county, then there's no way they will hand them over (weeks/months of downtime).

I would be asking for the syslogs, not the routers. Syslogs will provide actual valuable information on what happened on Nov 3-4th, as opposed to a bunch of physical hardware that will show nothing and require an extended outage.

4
Handy499 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have thought the same thing. The fact that they are keeping the routers so protected just makes them look dumb and guilty.

Either that, or there is something really abnormal about the routers that they don't want anyone to see.

1
Xuvial 1 point ago +2 / -1

The fact that they are keeping the routers so protected just makes them look dumb and guilty.

It's a bit like some random 3rd party company (not affiliated with any government authority) demanding you hand over your car for a few weeks/months because they suspect it was used for fraud, and in the meantime you'll have no car. Would you hand it over?

3
Balzenburg 3 points ago +3 / -0

Interesting analogy. If it were a government car and it was bought and paid for by the gov (tax payers) who legally ordered the audit (with subpoenas) and all i do is sit inside it and run it with full AC burning gas and then have citizens pay for the fuel. The fraud investigation of the car has potential to find a defect that could domino into changing the fabric of our republic….then yeah i hand in the keys. Da fuq

1
Handy499 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, it's not like that at all.

3
Losif 3 points ago +3 / -0

Depending on the router/AP, don't they store the MAC and IPs of all the devices it has connected to in a LAN? In theory they would have all the MACs of the tabulators, meaning they would be able to see if the tabs were connected at any time.

1
Xuvial 1 point ago +1 / -0

Depending on the router/AP, don't they store the MAC and IPs of all the devices it has connected to in a LAN?

They store MAC/IP mappings (known as the ARP table) that are active right at that very moment. They don't store anything about what MAC/IP's were connected 5 minutes ago, let alone what was connected 8 months ago.

Also the moment they get powered off and disconnected (in order to be handed over), they dump everything and revert back to their startup config. Think of a router like a set of traffic lights - all it cares about is what is happening in the present moment, it's all about speed. It doesn't care what happened in the past. That's why we have syslog servers.

1
Losif 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh. I guess I always assumed they were at least a 'little' smart. That honestly sounds like a switch the way it was described. Time for more research I guess. Thank you for the schooling!

2
H0rse 2 points ago +2 / -0

They do, but only so much. I presume they were asking for the configurations and logs from what I heard them say.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

They might show who tried 37,000 login attempts.

9
Salt_Cartoonist 9 points ago +9 / -0

If I'm not mistaken, the 37k attempts were access queries run locally in Windows from a script, to exceed the max security log size so the log drops off the older entries. Thereby deleting user access evidence from the days around the election. This would also show if a user accessed via RDP (remote desktop protocol) connection, so network and not locally. They were covering their tracks. I'm also pretty sure they deleted any "suspect" user SIDs from the registry.

3
CSIS_CIA_pure-evil 3 points ago +3 / -0

They might show port forwarding to individual voting machines. They might show that all incoming traffic (DMZ Demilitarized zone) was sent to a particular machine - perhaps the EMS election management server. Both forwarding and DMZ would have indicate that the election hardware was intended to be accessed externally from the internet.

0
deleted 0 points ago +2 / -2
-1
QLARP -1 points ago +1 / -2

It seems like the final piece of the puzzle after the 3 hand counts of the ballots.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

3 hand counts of the ballots? Where are you getting three?

The AZ Audit has completed one hand count of votes using the physical paper ballots.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks Professor! :)

2
HansMann 2 points ago +6 / -4

The audit will never end, they will never get that stuff they subpoenaed and they can't even get a majority to even subpoena now

9
ShyRipley 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thank you for that mega does of positivity and high energy! Glad your crystal ball is in full working order. Do you have the winning lottery numbers for Monday?

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +2 / -1

Its not that hard to predict, imagine thinking an tyrannical regime that holds ultimate power is willingly going to turn themselves in or hand over anything that makes implicates them when they don't have anyone forcing them to do anything.

This is straight out of the playbook or every other tyrannical regime in history.

Unfortunately, there's only one way really out of this but we have MUH OPTICS and shit to worry about it.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for that, but I really would prefer you keep your "there's only one way out of this" stuff out of our audit threads.

We are working hard on trying to solve this logically and peacefully, within the law, to prove the fraud and decertify/overturn a fraudulent result. It's not going to be easy or fast.

I understand you disagree, and that's cool. I don't come into your 1776 LETS GOOOOO TIME FOR THE NEXT BOX WE NEED CIVAL WAR 2.0 RIGHT NOW threads and crap all over them. I look, I back out, I leave you be.

I would appreciate it if you show the same respect to those attempting a different path.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's great, except that the law and judicial system has been completely corrupted. Its a bit difficult to use "through the law" when they control the law and every agency/court that would be used to prosecute them. If the law actually still mattered and was enforced, Hillary would be in jail by now along with many others. If you've been paying attention, you would have noticed that these people don't care about the law. They now ARE the law.

Also there's zero Constitutional mechanism for re-instating a President. If Republicans were too scared to not certify the fraudulent results of the election, what makes you think those Republicans will be strong enough (or even successfully) remove a sitting President and replace him and his entire cabinet despite there being zero legal or Constitutional mechanism to do so? You might say "they'll force them, this can't stand" but even if they tried, the leftists/deep state would threaten war, riots, civil unrest and prosecution via the "law enforcement" agencies they control before they willingly went along with it. They also control the military and won't be scared to use it. These are the same people who spent 4 years of lies, riots, civil unrest, encouraging violence, purposely "leaked" a virus from a Wuhan lab, and ultimately performed a soft coup to get rid of Trump and seize full power and control.

I'm just telling you what our Founders said in relation to corrupt governments and preserving freedom. I'm not advocating anything, just making a philosophical statement based on history and what our founders said in regards to tyranny and how it has to be stopped. Is it bad to repeat stuff that our Founding Fathers said? Were those some bad, racist, evil men? And don't worry, we are a generation of weak men who grew up in "good times" and value our comforts and safety more than anything. Our generation doesn't have the stomach for something like that which is why we just let it happen and hope the law or someone else will solve it. Our generation also likes to say stuff like "patriots are always peaceful" and pretend to ignore the fact that in history, patriots were actually never peaceful.

If America is ever revived, it will be from our grandchildren or their children, when they are living in total poverty under abject authoritarian rule without ever experiencing an ounce of freedom or any comforts. They will be the ones that will have nothing to lose and will have the real thirst for freedom.

Sorry to step on your hopium, but I'm just a realist.

2
Cozette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very unimaginative take. Thank God GEOTUS is very imaginative.

Also puzzling that Cult Death Globalists wet dream schemes for a civil war aka color revolution in America are also subtly being pushed "there's only oNe wAy...oUt of tHiS" fellow caterpillars.

Always wonder whether I've encountered another duper or one of the vulnerables they've duped into innocently peddling their malevolent schemes.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cool, I'm just relaying what our Founding Fathers said about tyranny and freedom. But those were some dumb men, am I right?

I'm sure Trump is much smarter than them. Seeing how he prevented the coup and all (even despite tweeting about it as early as January). I'm sure we will get rid of Biden and all the corruption/deep state by these strongly worded statements he posts each week. Or perhaps by using the fully corrupt judicial system and DOJ. I'm sure the Durham Report will be released any day now....tick tock.

2
Cozette 2 points ago +2 / -0

Curious. When making doomy statements about what will absolutely, positively happen in our future is a time machine used or something less high tech like a gypsy and crystal ball?

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

You guys were the same ones telling us "trust the Kraken", "trust the military", "trust Barr", and "trust Lin Wood" and were calling people doomers who disagreed that they would save us, am I right? The same ones that assured us Biden would never be sworn in?

1
Cozette 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the "Am I right?" question. Answer: No. :-)

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently I am right unless you can prove the Kraken saved us, the military performed mass arrests, or Barr stopped the coup.

8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +8 / -0

Here's some more color on the Citizens Grand Jury in GA:

BREAKING: Evidence To Soon Be Presented To Citizens Grand Jury Of Interstate Conspiracy To Manufacture/Harvest Counterfeit Ballots For Use In 2020 Election

https://ussanews.com/News1/2021/07/21/breaking-evidence-to-soon-be-presented-to-citizens-grand-jury-of-interstate-conspiracy-to-manufacture-harvest-counterfeit-ballots-for-use-in-2020-election/

Q)What were feelings based on these observations ?

A) Based on my experience in investigations and what I knew about the presidential election I believed this was election fraud and ballot harvesting.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

the buglione testimony -- good grief.

8
Nokabal 8 points ago +8 / -0

WE WONT GIVE UP!!

8
PorchLightOn 8 points ago +8 / -0

Regarding the legal options outlined by Red Roots AZ in the OP:

I watched the Gail Golec livestream last night with attorney Alexander Kolodin, primary legal counsel for the AZ House. As of this morning, Gail’s channel has been completely removed from YouTube.

Edit: War_Hamster found the video posted on Odysee: https://odysee.com/@GailGolec:0/az-warrants-and-decertification...-az:b


Kolodin’s background: In December, Kolodin worked alongside Sidney Powell, in a case contesting election results (dismissed without hearing evidence, lack of standing.) He filed a lawsuit over Sharpiegate, and represented Cyber Ninjas in the preliminary injunction filed by the Dems to shut down the audit.

In the interview, Kolodin seemed to throw cold water on the idea of issuing a warrant; saying if Fann directs the Sergeant at Arms to enforce a warrant, the MCBOS will go back to Judge Thomason’s court to quash the warrant.

More cold water: Kolodin implies it’s unlikely that Thomason will enforce the subpoenas. Thomason ruled in February that the Senate subpoenas were legal and enforceable, but the ruling states that he’s not enforcing them, nor has he been asked to.

(My own aside: The language in Thomason’s ruling does make me pessimistic about his interest in enforcing the subpoenas. Remember that Judge Thomason was chosen to hear this case by Judge Pamela Gates, the wife of Board member, Bill Gates. Thomason says: The courts should generally be hesitant to enter the fray of political disputes between two other branches of government.) Ruling below:

https://media.kjzz.org/s3fs-public/CV2020-016840-901-02252021.pdf

Kolodin says if the AZ Senate attorneys ask Judge Thomason to enforce the subpoenas (file a Motion to Compel) it’s possible Thomason could require a vote of the entire AZ legislative body as part of his ruling. That would mean a delay until the 2022 legislative session. (Gail was justifiably upset at this news.)

Kolodin thinks it would be better for the Senate to file a fresh court action, for the items that have been withheld, as a special action in the AZ Supreme Court. The AZ Supreme Court is fairly conservative as courts go, and likely to have a decent view on the issue of legislative supremacy.

Gail asked why AG Brnovich isn’t investigating election fraud allegations, and Kolodin says Brnovich can’t act on fraud allegations yet because he needs specific “who, what, when, where” info on the fraud committed, to tie the crime to a specific person.

To spur an investigation, he suggested a member of the AZ legislature could file a report with Brnovich. An AZ statute requires the AG to investigate fraud in the case of illegal conduct by a county, when a report is filed by any member of the state legislature.

Kolodin supports the AZ legislation taking a decertification vote, as a symbolic gesture. But he cautions that actions beyond decertification will be difficult to obtain through the courts. He says courts will bounce the case, saying it’s moot, because reclaiming one state’s electors isn’t enough to change the election results. And based on the rate of audits in other states, cases with reclaimed electors from multiple states may not be in court until “the last year of the Biden presidency.” He does mention that irrefutable evidence of something being changed in machines would make a difference. He was not aware of Mike Lindell’s symposium in August to present evidence.

He says there is better precedent for a member of the Senate or House to bring suit if fraud is uncovered in their election. Courts will still be hesitant, but any Congressional candidate can bring suit if they find fraud, and it’s harder for courts to these cases than cases involving presidential electors.

(I'm sorry this is so long. Complicated business. Also, eff you, YouTube, for taking Gail's channel and this video down.)

7
CrackerJack2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Speaking of Sharpies,
here's *blatant voter fraud detected by the sharpie bleed through!!!
( https://patriots.win/p/12jcci2z5P/ )

5
PorchLightOn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Folks, the above link is an interesting thread by u/CrackerJack2, worth looking at.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

I took a gander, along with the linked bubble post, but my eyes started glazing over.

I need the definitive front and back of said ballot before I can start theorizing.

The suggestion that it went to adjudication and one side was swapped out with an image from another ballot, which would explain why the bleed through only shows on one side, was quite interesting. But again, we need definitive front and back of the same ballot in order to start searching for a "dupe" of one of the sides.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you break this down in simple terms for the non-tech savvy?

I'd like to be able to explain it to others better than I can right now.

2
CrackerJack2 2 points ago +2 / -0

On the back side of the ballot you can see a set of black blotches out of place, those are the indications that someone who filled out the front of the ballot with a Sharpie or some other penetrating ink.
The problem is that when you look at the companion front side image, you can't see any of those misplaced or out of place blotches.
This most means someone else almost certainly marked the back of the ballot, and possibly with some type of ballot marking precision laser printer, or possibly an ink pen, filling in possibly empty ovals/bubbles/eclipses.
Which is of course illegal.
We can't know for sure without either an examination of the actual ballot, or a much higher resolution scan, preferably in color/gray scale.

Sent patriots.win link and images to https://voterga.org/.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Gail asked why AG Brnovich isn’t investigating election fraud allegations, and Kolodin says Brnovich can’t act on fraud allegations yet because he needs specific “who, what, when, where” info on the fraud committed, to tie the crime to a specific person.

That seems to address our fear of an investigation slowing down audit results. Seems the results must be announced and then trigger an investigation, which is what we want.

He says courts will bounce the case, saying it’s moot, because reclaiming one state’s electors isn’t enough to change the election results. And based on the rate of audits in other states, cases with reclaimed electors from multiple states may not be in court until “the last year of the Biden presidency.

Horsesh*t answer. If fraud is found, you decertify. PERIOD!. You do not avoid making a tough decision based on what you think may happen elsewhere.

Who cares if Biden is in his last week? If he's there illegitimately, he must be removed so history shows the fraud and all his acts deemed illegitimate.

8
ShyRipley 8 points ago +8 / -0

Who cares if Biden is in his last week? If he's there illegitimately, he must be removed so history shows the fraud and all his acts deemed illegitimate.

Absofrigginlutely.

I don't want it to take years, but if it must, so be it. I want The Truth out there for God and all the world to see and I want sleepy joe stripped of everything, even if it is his last day.

And now I sound like one of those Trump Derangement Syndrome people in reverse. The difference being this time, there actually is fraud. So fuk it.

2
WarHammyIsMuhBitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly. They tried to do it to GEOTUS but he’s not a criminal so they couldn’t.

6
KitKatCat 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm not sure why this would take to the last year of Biden's presidency. GA could be figured out before the year is out if not early next year. PA By Spring and of course AZ before the year is out.

I guess I'm not understanding the role the courts would play.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm with you. I think things could begin to move very quickly.

I am firmly opposed to the courts having any say in a States issue, despite what Mike Lindell says.

5
KitKatCat 5 points ago +5 / -0

I always figured once one state had to admit fraud it would be a bit easier in other states. I've always been worried AZ might wuss out. No one wants to be the first. Its why GA has always been at the top of my list. If Garland can get the declarative judgment he wants that would be huge. Even tho it won't over turn the election on its own. The good thing about the judge making the judgement is that it will be officially on the record and it might give other politicians and judges some balls.

I'm also hoping that we see senators like Rand Paul actually speak up about the idea of fraudulently elected senators if GA flips.

4
PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm not clear on the role of the courts either, but I'm guessing he means any vote to decertify will be challenged by the Dems in court, so there you are. Just like the people have the right to an audit, but that doesn't stop the Dems from going to court to block them, in every state.

It crossed my mind that he IS an attorney, and if you're a hammer, everything looks like a nail. But...I can't figure out how these questions can be kept out of the courts. I wish they could be.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dem challenges in court can backfire. Discovery works both ways.

3
Balzenburg 3 points ago +3 / -0

This argument is sound. More so that they impeached Trump as term was up…after they cheated. And kept going after him. And have not stopped. With the full force of their regime. Fuck them.

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

That seems to address our fear of an investigation slowing down audit results. Seems the results must be announced and then trigger an investigation, which is what we want.

I agree. Gail wants investigations now, before results are released, but I agreed with Kolodin's approach. Get the report first.

If fraud is found, you decertify. PERIOD!. You do not avoid making a tough decision based on what you think may happen elsewhere.

That's why I looked into his background more (also because he's running for the AZ House.) He does have links to the GOP in past years, but I couldn't turn up anything indicating he's anti Trump. He did say that he's just one attorney, and he's open to viewpoints from others.

3
maga_mama_757 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the synoposis, it is much appreciated!

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I disagree with Kolodin about the "who" being required to start an investigation.

You have evidence of fraud. You most certainly can start an investigation based on that to discover the "who".

I still want that to wait until after the report is finalized.

4
PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yeah that raised made me wonder about Kolodin too. In fact, Kolodin even said to Gail, "your supporters could investigate" to supply the "who" info, and file that report with the AG.

Gail got understandably outraged, and pointed out it was the job of the investigative branch of the AG's office to do the investigating, not citizens.

It was a long and frustrating video to try to summarize, that's for sure.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Another way of summarizing Kolodin's point here: They can't start an investigation until someone else has done the investigation for them.

7
Artymisfoul 7 points ago +7 / -0

Damn it. AUDIT NEVADA. Illegals were voting in tens of thousands.

4
ProfessorOak [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mindy Robinson is leading an audit effort in Nevada. She's got affidavits available here:

https://auditnevada.aweb.page/p/5dddf983-8118-4450-bf27-eeb9388aec3b

Mindy's also on telegram & gab so she might post some updates there:

https://t.me/AmericanAFMindyRobinson

https://gab.com/AmericanAFMindy

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Here's another detailed analysis on how election fraud can be remedied:

https://patriots.win/p/12jcci2i2K/from-2017--what-happens-if-the-e/

6
Neuro2b 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is becoming my first stop for headlines in the morning...great job Be great if we had a page like this to keep track of all the prisoners being held by Biden Garland regime

hmmm

4
ProfessorOak [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

The guys on the Look Ahead America discord were wanting to do something similar to that. They were thinking about making threads so we could work together to contact those who are facing charges. Neither of us could think of how to prevent bringing unwanted attention to those who might just want to be left alone though.

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would LOVE that, wish I could clone myself to contribute to that idea.

6
mercynurse 6 points ago +6 / -0

Appreciate this every time, Professor!

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Maricopa Official Who Demanded Republicans Use Sharpies On Election Day Donated To Mark Kelly Campaign

https://nationalfile.com/maricopa-official-who-demanded-republicans-use-sharpies-on-election-day-donated-to-mark-kelly-campaign/

Maricopa County Elections Assistant Director Kelly Dixon, who made headlines in 2020 for an email stipulating that voters be required to use Sharpie markers at polling places on Election Day, donated $100 to Democrat Sen. Mark Kelly less than two months before the 2020 election.

$100 isn't much, but it does show alignment.

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Here's some hopium from KanekoaTheGreat's Telegram:

<<<If Mike Lindell is able to decode the pcaps showing a timeline of; intrusion attempts, successful intrusions, actual commands to change votes, and those corresponding vote changes in the election database then he will be able to show the world that the 2020 election was hacked into and votes were changed.

Ideally, Mike's team would be able to sync some of these vote changes with the still unexplained vote subtractions and vote switches that we all watched live on national broadcast.

Then there will still undoubtedly be a lot of questions:

Who captured these pcaps and how were they captured? How were they encrypted and how were they decoded? How does the code or commands work to change votes?

By offering $5 million to anyone that can disprove his data, Mike Lindell is essentially saying that he is holding a royal flush, and he is ready to put his cards down on the table.

@KanekoaTheGreat>>>

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nice rundown.

He got one thing wrong tho - to qualify for the $5 million, one must be A. attending the symposium in person (the in person attendance is not open to the public, it is invite only) and B. be a credentialed cyber something or other.

I know you probably already know that, but for anyone scrolling through...

But it's good to see this is getting more attention. August 10-12 is going to be verrrrrrry interesting. Can't wait!

6
maga_mama_757 6 points ago +6 / -0

I haven't looked at this site in detail yet, just passing it on from a twitter exchange between Fann and Stephen Richer, Maricopa County Recorder. I'll go through it in a bit and see if I learn anything, or if this is just a typical effort to make the senate and auditors look crazy.

Richer: Please deal with facts. Whatever your political stripes, please stop airing conspiracy theories or unfounded allegations without doing research. It is irresponsible. Especially from elected leaders. We've built this website to offer facts.

Maricopa County Elections Department 'Just the Facts'

Fann: Then sit down and talk with us We should be doing this together to answer our constituents questions. Auditors would prefer to work with you instead of fighting to get the items Maricopa county is withholding

5
PorchLightOn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Thank you, there's a lot to read on that website. The Myth Busters section directly refutes many of the allegations made by the auditors in the last public hearing held by the Senate.

I also watched a few of the videos, and learned some things. They use two different kinds of tabulators to count the ballots. One counts early votes and absentee ballots. The other only counts election day ballots. I wonder why they need two completely different kinds of machines? They look nothing alike.

I'll have to spend some time on this site, glad you posted it.

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

what do you make of the Myth Busters section?

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

They seem to really be going out on a limb on some issues, kind of surprises me they'd do this in print. I'll have to spend some time going through it...

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

The one that is a complete lie is the Zuckerberg money.

They have contrived some semi-workable excuses for the voters not there in Nov. who voted and appeared in Dec. on the rolls.

Someone worked really hard on this and I am concerned a bit that it will look good to those who want to believe the best about Maricopa County BoS.

4
maga_mama_757 4 points ago +4 / -0

There is a lot, I'm taking my time with it. I noticed in the Myth Busters section they did not try to refute the 37,000 'anonymous queries' that effectively wiped data prior to 2/5. They didn't even mention that one. Interesting.

I haven't gotten to the videos yet but agree on the different tabulators. Seems odd to have two totally different types of machines to count basically the same things.

5
rainyday1234 5 points ago +7 / -2

free and fair elections needed

5
rainyday1234 5 points ago +7 / -2

we need voter id

5
rainyday1234 5 points ago +7 / -2

it must take a while for prof OAK to type all this

4
SurfingUSA 4 points ago +4 / -0

some sort of expression of thanks must be arrived at

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's getting free drinks at the victory party, that's for sure.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
ShyRipley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nice find. Thanks Barron.

FRIDAY JULY 23 2:00 PM EST / Senator Judy Ward (R-30), Senator Doug Mastriano (R-33) and Fulton County Commissioner Chairman Stuart Ulsh will gather today at the Fulton County Courthouse to announce their reaction to the Pennsylvania Department of State’s decision to decertify Fulton County’s election systems.

Link to watch live is on the page:

https://senatormastriano.com/2021/07/23/today-lawmakers-county-commissioner-to-announce-reaction-to-department-of-state-decision-to-decertify-fulton-county-election-systems/

4
PorchLightOn 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks folks

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

The hearing is over. It started at 2 and was only like 20 minutes. You might search around for a replay.

There wasn't much to it, except laying out how certain officials keep trying to limit anyone's abilities to look at the election via audits, and if a county such as Fulton dares to do their own audit or audit of the machines, the SOS will punish them by decertifying their machines without even looking at them.

5
PorchLightOn 5 points ago +5 / -0

I had trouble with it also; loaded it twice, and had to find a way to turn on the audio.

Basically Mastriano was lending his support to the officials of Fulton County, who are fighting against the SoS's recent notification that their machines will all be decertified. The SoS is saying the machines were ruined by an audit done in (Feb?) by Wake Technologies. But the officials who spoke called it out for what it is: the bully tactics of thugs used in other countries, in attempts to intimidate other PA counties so they won't cooperate with audits.

You could hear some shouting from the crowd; I think the citizens of Fulton County PA are fed up with the gestapo tactics of their state government.

4
ShyRipley 4 points ago +4 / -0

Mine was pre-muted but I do that on YT so knew to look for it straight away. Vid died in the middle of the lady senator so had to re-open the player.

Yeah, the shouting. I hope that was our side. I think everyone is getting fed up with government obstruction and overreach right now, Fulton county PA is right there with yes, the bullying.

I just got lost in a horrid rabbit hole of big government tangles and knots. Remember how AZ SOS said Maricopa would have to buy all new election machines cause the auditors compromised them? And Fann came back with "if you have a way/software tests to certify machines prior to each election to make sure they are safe for voting, but that same test is not able to check machines after the auditors looked at them, then that software test is obviously not good enough to certify the machines prior to an election. Right?"

So I was looking for the same thing in PA. Get to the SOS page, have to dig to get to election certification of machines, find a little blurb, finally, over on a votespa.com page, where it says the PA Department of State will give counties guidance on pre-election testing, but I can't find the verbiage. I had to give up or I'll be digging all night.

But I sure hope someone who has Fulton County Commissioner Chairman Stuart Ulsh's ear will think of the same thing and find exactly what the "pre-election testing" is and ask the PA Secretary of State, hey, if that testing is good enough to certify our machines are not compromised prior to an election, why is it not good enough to use after we have an Election System Analysis conducted by Wake Technology Services Inc. Huh SOS? Huh???

https://www.co.fulton.pa.us/files/elections/Fulton%20County%20PA%20EMS%20Assessment%202-19-2021.pdf

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe this is what you were looking for: https://www.dos.pa.gov/VotingElections/OtherServicesEvents/Documents/LA%20Directive%20and%20Checklist%2010182019for%20web.pdf

I remembered they were called "Logic and Accuracy Tests" in Maricopa county, so tried that search in PA, and it looks like it's the same thing there.

It says: "As you know, pre-election Logic and Accuracy Testing (L & A Testing) is necessary to ensure that ballot marking devices and scanners are properly configured and in good working order prior to being delivered to the various voting locations in your county. Pre-election L & A Testing is also necessary to ensure that the tabulating elements of voting systems are accurately tabulating voted ballots..."

There's no freaking reason on earth that the same regular L&A tests can't be applied right now, and they know it.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ahhh... together, you and I make a solid non-tired brain. :D

That's it. Totally it. If the Pre-election L & A Testing is good enough to certify that everything is working right ahead of an election, surely it is good enough to certify the same after an audit. And if it isn't, then it's not good enough pre-election either.

PENNSYLVANIA PEDES, CAN SOMEONE GET THIS INFO TO YOUR SEC OF STATE OR THE DUDE IN FULTON COUNTY SO HE CAN???

Let's use logic and watch them try to weasel out of it.

3
maga_mama_757 3 points ago +3 / -0

Something about this man and his words make me teary. :(

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Incoming wall of text from Nick Moseder (it'll be worth it):

1/4 Audit the Vote PA’s co-founder Toni Shuppe is being attacked by Washington County state senator Camera Bartolotta

Why you ask?!

For exposing her for the big ol SWAMP creature that she is. This RINO is attempting to sabotage the forensic audit effort in PA. She leaked to the MSM that Mastriano was initiating an audit days before the official letter was released. She also thwarted an audit in her own county.

2/4 Toni Shuppe brought to light the fact that she’s married to the former speaker of the house and STAUNCH liberal Bill DeWeese, who was actually arrested for misusing funds!

Toni also exposed that Camera has a history of involvement in soft core porn, and is credited in VERY troublesome movies with titles like “Lucifer’s Unholy Desires” and “Breeding Farm” (a movie about humans being forced into breeding babies that are then trafficked to cannibals). KIND OF WEIRD RIGHT?! However, Camera Bartolatta has kept this a secret throughout her time in the senate!

3/4 These are important things that her constituents deserve to know, wouldn’t you agree?! Especially as she tries to pass new legislation which will allocate tons of money to the film industry (most likely a money laundering scheme).

Well it seems ms Bartolatta believes otherwise. She is PANICKED by this truth surfacing and is doing EVERYTHING she can to cover this up!

4/4 First, she issued a cease and desist letter to Toni Shuppe, and since Toni refused to take down the information, she went a step further and publicly doxxed Toni Shuppe, releasing her home addresses to the public!

Toni is a mother, and a great patriot leading the charge for election integrity in PA. This is not only unacceptable, but it is ILLEGAL given she is an elected official. This swamp creature needs REMOVED, and WeThePeople must send a message by showing Toni Shuppe, Karen Taylor, Jamie Sheffield, and AuditTheVote our unwavering support!

Since Camera Bartolotta likes Doxing her constituents, she needs to be removed. In the meantime, let her know how you feel!

She can be reached at (724)746-3762

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

WOW

These people really have no shame. And in the case of Camera Bartolatto, it appears that no shame goes really deep.

Publically doxing Toni Shuppe is just lower than low. A mom. Fighting for election integrity for We The People. Toni does not deserve that, not even for uncovering Camera's skeletons.

Stuff is crazy. Pennsylvania officials gnashing their teeth and hissing big time. Might be feeling cornered?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thought you might enjoy that story.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember the doxxing of the two Michigan election commissioners? who wanted to withhold their signatures

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

These people are Marxists. They believe they are superior and therefore justified in enforcing their version on how the world should be run, and they will not be stopped. Global Collectivism is the most dangerous cult of them all.

To put it simply, they think the ends justify the means, and we know that this belief will always lead to tyranny.

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good grief. We're gonna need at least thirty hours in every day to sort out these crazy developments. Thanks for the heads up.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

🤡🌎 maybe has a slower rotation.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Here is CodeMonkeyZ breaking down Mike Lindell's PCAP exercise:

https://patriots.win/p/12jccjAYWl/

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

also good

5
SurfingUSA 5 points ago +5 / -0

good judge contest winners

OK we have some winners in the Good Judges' contest:

Judge Amero in Fulton County

u/PorchLightOn

u/ShyRipley

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Timothy Thomason, who ruled in favor of the AZ senate

u/War_Hamster

Here is the judge I was thinking of:

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court Judge Patricia McCullough

She found that, duh, of course SoS Boockvar should not have been monkeying around with the election rules without following the PA Constitution (link) Her ruling on Nov. 28 made it briefly seem like OF COURSE the courts would reliably tackle election fraud, but the Pa Supreme Court went nuts and grabbed the case and reversed her.

McCullough had a special kind of courage in the heat of the post-election that was ALMOST unique. But there are three more good judges I also recall:

Chief Justice Patience Roggensack

Annette Ziegler

Rebecca Bradley

These three on the Wisconsin Supreme Court also ruled for Trump on that state's election rigging. Lost 4-3 went a RINO joined the liberals.

Anyway, list in total:

(1) McCullough (PA)

(2, 3, 4) Roggensack, Ziegler, Bradley (WI)

(5) Amero (GA)

(6) Thomnson (AZ)

I truly feel that McCullough was the first and only judge who looked straight at the law and ruled without a whole lot of fear of getting car-bombed and also, with integrity and courage. from then on, we were in Clown World where nearly the entire legal community went into scared mouse world.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ridiculous that PA got so badly hamstrung because their Supreme Court judges are elected by Dominion.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ahh McCullough. Okay, good one. I remember the case but it's now so far back in this timeline that it had gotten buried in my poor head filled with lots of stuff. ;)

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Did I win anything? I need to win a nap, if possible. I had completely forgotten about McCullough.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

have a nice afternoon refreshing nap!

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you! After thinking about it, please forward my prize to ProfessorOak, who's probably getting about four hours of sleep lately.

3
SurfingUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Oakie needs to get about three lakehouses, I mean if a Bernie Sanders can qualify for doing pretty much nothing useful ...

5
rainyday1234 5 points ago +8 / -3

TURN OVER THE ROUTERS maricopa county

3
swellrider08 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is it inevitable that they will eventually have to hand them over as they have been subpoenaed?

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't like that word "inevitable".

If they destroy evidence, the worst they can get is Obstruction of Justice and they'll be protected by the DS operatives.

If they produce the evidence, they may be facing Treason charges.

You have to figure this calculation is going through a few people's heads.

5
PorchLightOn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I'm moving away from inevitable too. They may have done the risk calculation, and realized it's better to fight this out in court, hoping that the Senate will give up on finding a judge willing to enforce the subpoenas. They know the clock is running, the public is impatient for results, and things fall off the public radar after enough time goes by. I really hate to be pessimistic, but I have little faith left in the courts. Seems to be so rare to find a judge that believes in doing what's right for the people.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, but it only takes one good judge to turn the tide, so that avenue still has to be explored.

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Quiz for you guys:

Name the one good judge in the post election litigation.

Prize to be thought up by me while waiting.

u/PorchLighton u/ShyRipley

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

I would say Judge Amero in Fulton County has been reasonable and fair. He's super careful to cross all the T's and dot the I's, but I can't blame him for that. Without Amero we wouldn't be heading towards accessing any GA paper ballots for forensic inspection.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hammy got the best one. I'll take the second... the judge that allowed Garland Favarito's group VoterGA to audit the audit in Fulton County Georgia and had the ballot images released in order for them to do so..

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

That was a good one too!

I'll give this a bit longer and see if anyone comes up with it.

Clue: The state where this judge sits and rules is the one that Giuliani hit first with his series of hearings.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'd have to go with the one in AZ who let the audit proceed.

2
SurfingUSA 2 points ago +2 / -0

HMMMM. I think I will have to count that one, yes, but the one I'm thinking of, was in the fairly immediate election aftermath, and the ruling went to the evil heart of the election rigging, not the audit side of things. (and the one I'm thinking of, was not Alito on Scotus, although he kind of did try.)

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Theoretically? Yes.

In actual practice in the current state of things? They should have turned them over MONTHS ago - along with other items/data they are withholding - and don't seem to fear any repercussions. They don't seem to understand or simply do not care that every day they refuse, the more guilty they look.

4
rainyday1234 4 points ago +6 / -2

i mean AUDIT

4
gunteh 4 points ago +4 / -0

/u/ProfessorOak Paul Boyer is holding up the subpoena of the Maricopa County Routers. Can we get a note to put extra pressure on his office?

4
Bump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you Professor! Your posts are the first ones I look for every day when I come on here. Your efforts to cut through all the background noise to give us the important information are so appreciated 👍👍👍❤️

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wasn't sure this had been posted here and it's worth the watch. For what it's worth, YouTube has already pulled the video:

Gail Golec: AZ Warrants and Decertification... AZ House of Representative Attorney Alex Kolodin Weighs In

https://odysee.com/@GailGolec:0/az-warrants-and-decertification...-az:b

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good to know it's up on Odysee! I just posted about this video above.

There's a lot in the video. It's kind of frustrating to watch; Gail had internet problems all day, and was unable to do prep research for the interview. Some of Kolodin's views were a little deflating, but I looked hard into his background, and he's been in the trenches with the pro-audit folks. I think he's justifiably pessimistic about our side getting helpful remedies from most courts, but he seems down for the fight.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've only watched a bit of it, and will get to the rest later and respond with more detail.

Generally, it seems to reinforce my belief that this should be kept out of the courts for both practical and Constitutional reasons.

3
ShyRipley 3 points ago +3 / -0

Generally, it seems to reinforce my belief that this should be kept out of the courts for both practical and Constitutional reasons.

Amen to that on both counts

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
kazimiera 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is what I look for first. In the " new" / sticky part. It goes well with the first cup of coffee

3
SteveBannonsNckbeard 3 points ago +4 / -1

Is there any recourse to issuing additional subpoenas after needledick traitor Paul Boyer voted with the Ds? Also, how did we get the original one if this cock is one of the votes we need in the senate?

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

PorchLightOn discussed some of the other options here:

https://patriots.win/p/12jccgurkP/x/c/4JBvqMVMr1V

2
PorchLightOn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, how did we get the original one if this cock is one of the votes we need in the senate?

My understanding: Paul Boyer's refusal to vote isn't preventing the Senate from getting a subpoena (they have the power to issue Subpoenas without question.) He's preventing them from enforcing that subpoena, by refusing to add his vote to hold the Board in contempt.

The subpoena was issued by the Senate, not by the court, so it falls to the Senate to enforce it. And if they don't have the votes to hold the Board in contempt for not complying, the Senate subpoena basically has no teeth.

Back in February, Judge Thomason agreed that the Senate's subpoena was legal and enforceable, but he stopped short of saying he would do anything to enforce it.

The Senate can file a motion to ask Judge Thomason to enforce it, but it sounds unlikely this judge wants to do that, based on the wording in his ruling. Also, he was assigned to this case by the wife of one of the Board members, Judge Pamela Gates...just saying, Thomason may already be biased towards the Board.

It might be better for the Senate to issue a new subpoena for the missing items, through the AZ Supreme Court, and see if they can get that court to agree to enforce it, and take action against the Board when they refuse to comply.

It looks to me like they may need a subpoena issued by a court, because that would have legal teeth.

3
SteveBannonsNckbeard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks for the info, makes sense.

3
EggPlanter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Serious question, since I'm ignoring the legal intricacies here, why not put all 4 actions in motion simultaneously in case one or more fails?

3
PorchLightOn 3 points ago +3 / -0

(Disclaimer: definitely not a legal pede!) I think they might be able to pursue an investigation with AG Brnovich at any point, because that seems like a separate action.

But I don't think it's proper to have legal actions arising out of the same incident ongoing in two courts at the same time, like seeking motions to enforce a subpoena for the same purpose. One article I read said it would be giving the plaintiff "two bites at the same apple," and I think judges won't allow it.

2
ShyRipley 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oops sorry just saw this. Which 4 actions are you wondering should be put in motion simultaneously?

2
PorchLightOn 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think EggPlanter is referring to the four different legal options available to the AZ Senate, listed by Arizona Red Roots in the OP.

3
rainyday1234 3 points ago +6 / -3

you did that post quick , and INPRESSIVE LENTH

4
TyTy28 4 points ago +4 / -0

Impressive length AND girth! Only the THICKEST audit updates here!

3
Kimball_Kinnison 3 points ago +4 / -1

These lists are great, but may I make a suggestion? Physical (snail mail) letters have much more impact than emails or phone calls. If you have the time, send those.

4
ProfessorOak [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thanks for the reminder! I've been forgetting to include some mailing addresses. You're very right about letters, so I'll make sure to add the main politicians' addresses.

3
Pepe4Freedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Absolutely agree recalling Boyer is a fantastic idea, let's see it happen!

3
DrunkenWalMart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Great work

3
Kansayhey 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank God for these posts.

3
chahn1138 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kemp is SUCH A TOOL!

2
rainyday1234 2 points ago +4 / -2

high ENERGY

2
rainyday1234 2 points ago +4 / -2

HIGH ENERGY under the oak tree

2
pente1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Patrick Byrne's audit fund? How much goes into his pocket? He is always lurking for money.

1
9x10again 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know exactly why, but he kind of bugs me.

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +4 / -3

does anyone know if the trump rally in az is going to be on OAN?

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

They've been covering the last couple.

But if you come here on Rally Day, there will be stickied posts where pedes post all of the different sites carrying it live. I usually try to watch on RSBN and have backup sites loaded.

1
ShyRipley 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't know if OAN will carry it. My gut says probably...

Right Side Broadcasting live streams Trump rallies.

https://rumble.com/c/RSBN

https://rsbnetwork.com/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP2V8ijOY3U

1
Heroftheday 1 point ago +2 / -1

So you're saying stop the push to decertify Arizona?

4
maga_mama_757 4 points ago +5 / -1

There is no "decertification vote" going on in AZ right now; that was misinformation circulating yesterday. Sen Wendy Rogers is calling for decertifcation, but there isn't a formal process or vote happening. (Yet?)

They aren't at that point yet, as the audit has not yet been completed or the official results released. We've got to get on the BoS to turn over the routers and other necessary info in order to fully complete the audit. The warrant option listed above seems like the simplest answer to me, as it doesn't resquire a vote...just two people to sign off on it. It might be best to concentrate our efforts on having Sen Peterson writing the report and encouraging Fann to sign it.

Or at least 'reminding' them that they have other options available to them when it comes to getting the necessary items from the BoS. I think the BoS has made it pretty clear that they are not going to obey the subpeona.

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

SAVE AMERICA

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

TRUMP WON ALL 50

1
LetsNukeChina 1 point ago +2 / -1

Few weeks they will have figure out how to make this not matter like all the rest. The government is not going to go after the government. The audits will be nice but it wont matter. The pentagon and police will continue doing what the white house and intel agencies demand.

What the audits will do is make 100% clear to the world that the USA is run by Despots. But all the allied nations already are as well so it also wont matter.

Law and Order needs to be restored from the highest levels down. But the highest levels are the most corrupt.

Im not sure the American Patriot fully appreciates the level of shit in which he finds himself.

America has hard times ahead.

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

MAGA

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

i cant wait for results

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

HAPPY FRIDAY

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +3 / -2

permanent stickie over here

1
Marshall2 1 point ago +1 / -0

When are you going to scratch the RINO Byrnes fundraising apparatus?