78
Comments (22)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
4
SaltyDoggy [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

They wont grant exemptions

3
Trilby 3 points ago +3 / -0

It said in the article that they would or could give exemptions, it's not certain. That's why I'm saying that these mandates are bullshit. If it was a matter of life or death there's be no exemptions. The article says there could be, for religious or medical reasons. Did I not read the same article as everyone else here? Am I losing my mind?

1
lawlady1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. It's the when they say "religious reasons" they will say "we have many people here who are of that religion and vaccinated". Offering people false hope to help them make a conscious choice and it never was a choice because a business can not grant it based on their opinion if you actually have a religious exemption is fucking rude. It's a frustrating "exemption" and speaking on it as a possible reason to refuse the vaccine is irritating.

I do get what you are saying but stating if it was that dangerous there would be no exemption, but for that to be the case, states with exemptions would have to make laws to change that.

So it's not as simple as

"If it was a true deadly pandemic there would be no exemptions".

2
SentryS 2 points ago +2 / -0

Which is why you do not give them any information. You state that I do not wish to share with you my faith because we are persecuted for it. When they challenge it again, you explain this is the exact reason and you’re making me feel threatened.