2698
Comments (93)
sorted by:
93
Jefferson 93 points ago +94 / -1

That's not a reason to suppress Ivermectin. The vaccines does not fully prevent the disease and Ivermectin can be used to treat the symptoms. People are dumb enough to take a vaccine even when there is a treatment option, so they don't need to suppress Ivermectin.

104
deleted 104 points ago +105 / -1
88
BadManOrange 88 points ago +88 / -0

It's also being suppressed because you can't have emergency authorization for a vaccine if there's a working treatment. It's also being suppressed because there's no money in Ivermectin. Treating coof at $100 a pop means no money.

53
deleted 53 points ago +54 / -1
15
ChuckedBeef 15 points ago +15 / -0

So apparently India's government actually cares about their people and our government couldn't care any less about us.

How many contracts that are legal and binding get broken by government intervention? It happens all the time. What's Pfizer going to do about it? Absolutely nothing. Pfizer should have their headquarters reduced to ashes if they tried to block citizens from getting life saving drugs just because of 'muh contract'

Unfortunately big pharma currently runs our government along with China. We have a bunch of robots in office, just insert money and tell them what to do.

8
Thetigerpoppy 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's even worse than that. We pay 19$ per dose of the vaccine here in the U.S, the unamed country this leaked from is paying 12.50$ a dose...

2
gunteh 2 points ago +2 / -0

....also mentioned conversion from USD to Euros, so putting 12.50/dose together with Euros, I'm sure Pfizer can pinpoint the exact country that leaked it, and try to go after them.

My gut tells me it wasn't the country itself that leaked this contract, it was a translation company hired to translate the legal documents into a specific language, that got a hold of a copy, and then leaked it. Someone is going to get outed real quick, but under the table.

2
Hendrixdan57 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont think the most poverty sticken countries government gives a rats ass about them. They are probably pissed all the slave labor is dying and there is a chip shortage so all the indian super nerds cant build robots to replace the work force

22
Dunkin4COVAIDS 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is 100% why it and all other alternatives are being suppressed.

12
anotherthing 12 points ago +12 / -0

Anyone know how the contract works? I know the government in the United States is paying for the viels of clot shot, but do they pay these companies regardless of if they're used or not? Johnson & Johnson trying to get the expiration date extended would suggest they only pay based on if the clot shots are used, but the suppression of treatments would suggest otherwise.

7
Dunkin4COVAIDS 7 points ago +7 / -0

I do not know how the contract works, but if I had to guess the US pays whether they're used or not, hence the campaign to get everyone vaccinated. Although, I've also never known government to give a shit how taxpayer money is spent/wasted either. More likely they're all pushing for it because they have investment interest in the vaccine and will make $$$ off full vaccination.

5
lul_cheto 5 points ago +5 / -0

Imo its just the social credit score pathway

1
anotherthing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Given the push and knowing how many people in power, like the CDC and Fauci, we've seen that have stakes in Big Pharma, it would look like they get paid per dose given as well. It would be really nice to know for sure.

5
ComebackKing 5 points ago +5 / -0

Winner, winner chicken dinner.

1
dparks2010 1 point ago +1 / -0

THIS, RIGHT HERE!!

1
LittleRocketMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo. This is the big reason.

5
Lurker6 5 points ago +5 / -0

The natural immunity piece can not be understated. Look at israel right now. Their percent of new cases is equally matching the # of vaccinated so the vaccines efficiency is essentially 0 there in terms of case numbers, but no one who previously caught covid before is being reinfected.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
4
LostViking1985 4 points ago +4 / -0

Because you survived the virus... the drug didn't kill it, your body did. The drug just makes the symptoms less severe.

24
War_Hamster 24 points ago +24 / -0

If they don't suppress Ivermectin, they have to pull their EUA for all "vaccines".

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
9
chuckachookah 9 points ago +9 / -0

"vaccines"

We need to drop the quotes.

Call it a pseudo-vaccine or a gene therapy (which is what the makers call them).

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

Pseudo-vaccine gives them too much credit.

But anything to point out that they are NOT in fact, vaccines, will do.

5
chuckachookah 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agree... but, we have to take the language back. This is fundamentally part of the problem.

I like gene therapy; or gene therapy stab.

Both are true.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

100% agreed on taking the language back.

I push back every single chance I get, which is quite often in SoCal.

My pet peeve is a Republican who talks about "our democracy".

3
chuckachookah 3 points ago +3 / -0

Haha. Yeah. That’s hilarious. No self awareness is both funny and frustrating

15
Ballind 15 points ago +15 / -0

It absolutely is a reason. If there's a cheap cure, they are suddenly stuck holding the bag on a billion dollar contract with a product they can't sell to taxpayers. They don't look stupid if they are able to block the cure without getting caught

9
Controlgroup 9 points ago +9 / -0

THIS. They bought the vaccines regardless. If ppl don’t want to take them, then they lose money

8
sleepingbeautyc 8 points ago +8 / -0

But if ivermectin breaks through its strangle hold. Boosters will not be able to be sold.

5
barney85 5 points ago +5 / -0

businesses are starting to mandate the gene therapy death jab

4
BeardedNinjaPede 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm a .gov employee, but not the glowie type. I expect Xiden to mandate all .gov employees get the vax or be fired as soon as the vaxxes are FDA approved. I will make them fire me because I'm not taking it.

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +5 / -0

And it doesn't explain why cucks like Trudeau resigned to extend the contracts until 2024 for booster shots

40
Pede 40 points ago +40 / -0

Has anyone put together a running total of covid lies that will embarrass the "trust the science" people? Here's what I have

  • First Fauci says you don't need masks. Later Fauci admitted he lied to save masks for nurses.
  • Just 2 weeks to slow the spread. Then extended for a year before businesses are allowed to fully reopen.
  • Unlike any coronavirus or flu, they pressed everyone to stay indoors instead of getting outside for exercise, sunlight, and fresh air. Not a single mention in MSM over 1.5 years about improving your health to have a better immune system.
  • Closing parks and beaches, when there has been virtually zero transmission outdoors where there is no sustained close contact with other people.
  • No, there will be no forced vaccinations. Later, you're fired unless you get the jab.
  • Trump's rushed experimental vaccine is dangerous and nobody should take it. Biden took office and then it's mandatory to take it.
  • Ivermectin is ineffective as a treatment. Later, it works but it's been suppressed because of contracts to use the vaccines instead.

Of course, the medical science model of putting drugs in people for everything instead of promoting healthier living habits is horrible, but that's more of a worldview thing.

15
Generic 15 points ago +15 / -0

What's even better is that some states closed the ocean because covid, but the beach was safe. Then others closed the beaches cause covid, but the ocean was safe.

13
HeavyVetting 13 points ago +13 / -0

Go back to the beginning where they said it's not a big deal, it can't even be transmitted between humans, it's just the flu, we don't need to shut down travel with China, it won't affect America at all. There won't be a vaccine for over a year and even then it should be viewed with caution.

Maybe that was more accurate than the current narrative but it didn't prevent them from doing a complete 180.

2
throwawayicanremembe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't forget Fauci said we should be wearing goggles too.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
8
yetanotherweirdo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Unfortunately, I expect they get rush-approved to be approved by Oct/Nov.

4
NotTakingDownMyFlag 4 points ago +4 / -0

pfizer already vaccinated their control group from what i heard. How could it ever get approval now? oh wait they have all the power and can just flip buttons.

19
Kavvfefe 19 points ago +19 / -0

The countries prostituted themselves to big pharma aka great sorcerer

6
HeavyVetting 6 points ago +6 / -0

Spoiler alert: they always were

14
MrDonaldTrump 14 points ago +14 / -0

Probably has more to do with the vax losing emergency FDA approval if there's an alternative treatment. If they admitted ivermectin was effective, Big pharma would have no product to deliver (or sell).

9
Tallsie 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is the correct answer. Accepting a treatment exists would void the EUA

12
remindmelater 12 points ago +12 / -0

Contract with the devil....die or go to hell....the choice is yours....

2
Kavvfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

enter Dr Faucstus

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
8
yukondave 8 points ago +8 / -0

I can't wait for someone to take to court this contract and others when they demand you get injected. The manufacturer has clearly warned the buyers and NOT the user.

"Long term effects and efficiency:

“Purchaser acknowledges…the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known.”

“If you were wondering why Ivermectin was suppressed, well, it is because the agreement that countries had with Pfizer does not allow them to escape their contract, which states that even if a drug will be found to treat COVID19 the contract cannot be voided.”

"Supplying the product:

“Pfizer shall have no liability for any failure to deliver doses in accordance with any estimated delivery dates… nor shall any such failure give Purchaser any right to cancel orders for any quantities of Product.”

"Now for the BIG SECRET: $12 per dosage for about 250K units.

Funny that this is the price for a small amount of dosages when Pfizer was charging the US $19.50 per dose."

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yup, the different price for different countries is something that needs to be discussed.

Why should US taxpayers, who subsidized the development, pay more than any other nation?

3
Generic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Israel was at $69/dose?

0
yukondave 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because we signed first and it was not known if it would be bought by other countries.

4
chuckachookah 4 points ago +4 / -0

The actual documents are overtly a "buyer beware" (Caveat emptor)

But, the public push is "MUST TAKE THE STAB".

This is literally the farthest thing away from Caveat emptor.

This is literally the same "logic" we saw with the election debacle

  • Patriots: Hey, these state's have altered voting and are sending out millions of paper ballots to be mailed in without having a law in the state that allows it
  • Courts: You have no standing
  • Patriots: But, we are voter in the state.
  • Courts: erm, ah, Oh yeah, you don't have any injury
  • Fucked Up/Fishy Election Shit ensues
  • Patriots: Hey Courts, fucked up shit happened and we need an action to asses
  • Courts: Sorry, the case is moot.

Anyone feeling like this is what's going on with the pseudo-vaccine?

1
yukondave 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree with you BUT,

I buddy worked in a prison and said he learned so much about crime and how not to be a victim. No one knew they trucked in ballots and printed them themselves. Now we do. I think we know this was a giant scam. Now lets stop the silly stuff and not let it happen again. Lets make it clear it happen and expose it.

7
TrumpTrain45 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's pretty standard guys. If you agree to buy something from me, and I go into production to make your order, you can't cancel because you found something else you want to try. Almost any contract will look exactly the same.

1
I_lurk_u_long_time 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly this. Are people really saying The Government is terrified of wasting a few million dollars? Clearly they have some other government I'm not familiar with, because wasting a few million dollars is my government's second favorite thing to do (a close second behind wasting a few billion dollars).

6
BS2020 6 points ago +6 / -0

its all about money

5
cryptoa 5 points ago +5 / -0

The contract is insane.

Basically no liability for Pfizer, and no matter what happens they get paid.

So basically the billions promised to Pfizer have to be paid, even if the vax's killed everyone who took it Pfizer cannot be sued and the government(s) will still have to pay for it.

So they are going to shove these vaccines into us no matter what because the money is spent already. And I am sure that Moderna/AZ/J&J all have the same contracts.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
cryptoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually the boosters now will become easier to justify.

They are just waiting for more people to buy in so then they can release the real efficacy numbers.

People who already were sheeple and got jabbed, at this point they are defeated and will just roll up their sleeve and take another jab, they already got one. They are suckered in.

So its no problem now to say after 8-12 weeks you aren't protected get another shot. And people will just line up.

4
CoyoteTan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you believe anyone signed this shit? I dont know who is worse. Pfizer for authoring it or the idiot pols who signed it.There must be some seriousw kickbacks.

4
Purplenurplebrigade 4 points ago +4 / -0

Does anyone have any info on the efficacy of ivermectin in binding to or eradicating vaccine induced spike proteins throughout the body? I was in a position where I had to get the jab. Can anyone point me to a reputable source on proper dosage and duration? Or should I just hold on to it in the case I get covid post-vax?

3
ebuy123 3 points ago +3 / -0

if the tweets are taken town, the thread is taken down. archived here: https://archive.is/gd7Bt

3
TheRealJaredHolt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Grow some fucking balls. That contract is barely enforceable in any court, and even if it is, it only takes a couple countries to tie up phizer in court for a couple years before they collapse.

1
based_trekkie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Foreign country should immediately arrest all pfizer employees in that country and demand the contract be nullified or else!

2
Controlgroup 2 points ago +2 / -0

Should sticky - very interesting read

2
Mypasswordisturtles5 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now we need to figure out how to repair out dna.

Plenty of stuff out there that sounded as daft as ivermectin a year ago.

2
elvisbird 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watching most of the US Team kneel, other athletes of foreign countries must be saying to themselves, these people are nuts for disrespecting their country and if I tried this stunt I would be throw off my team forever.

2
CMDRConanAAnderson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does ending the EUA end this agreement?

2
BigBadJim 2 points ago +2 / -0

You cannot vaccinate or immunize a coronavirus.

2
citydwellertrumpfan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone have the PDF of it? Would like to download & print with embedded images but ThreadReader requires subscription.

2
Dingmann01 2 points ago +2 / -0

Anyone got a link to the documents themselves? I am hitting a wall in trying to locate them

2
Haun_Solo0211 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who would sign this “contract”

2
JoseyMontana 2 points ago +2 / -0

MODS STICKY THIS PLEASE

1
dixie_knormous 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is unbelievable.

1
me-no-likely3 1 point ago +1 / -0

Meh. Pfizer doesn’t care if you use ivermectin, they’ll get paid regardless.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
me-no-likely3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is the government contracted to buy boosters forever?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
me-no-likely3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Genius

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Jota211 1 point ago +1 / -0

TLDR; Pfizer is not responsible for anything bad that happens and they get paid all their money no matter what...

1
holytrpbatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I signed all you people up for lots more bullshit." - some government fuckers that need to swing.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some contracts are meant to be broken.

1
tentonbudgie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That doesn't make sense. At least until after countries signed their contracts. Once the contract is signed, who cares? The point of the contract is to set a predictable course in business, inputs and outputs, and calculate what you need to get the work done.

The only way anyone would suppress Ivermectin is until the contracts are signed.

1
Shalomtoyou 1 point ago +1 / -0

And what exactly is the contract? "You will led us inject your entire population or else?"

1
EggPlanter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Something something certain clauses can be found to be so one-sided and oppressive that they can be partially and fully made whole by striking the offending clause or adjacent supporting clauses.

1
Greenhills 1 point ago +1 / -0

It wouldn’t be the first time governments wasted money. All of a sudden now they want to get the full $12.99 they paid for the buffet?

1
DoozerChuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Long term effects and efficiency:

"Purchaser acknowledges...the long-term effects and efficacy of the Vaccine are not currently known and that there may be adverse effects of the Vaccine that are not currently known."