Comments (198)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Jon888 241 points ago +241 / -0

Keep that as ammunition against Facebook and "fact checkers"

ChuckedBeef 111 points ago +111 / -0

Facebook, official fact checker for the CDC.

ProphetOfKek 81 points ago +82 / -1

To be fair, the cdc is largely bullshit.

ChuckedBeef 42 points ago +45 / -3

I'd still rank them above Fakebook, at least they are publishing information and not censoring it.

Whoopies_tds 34 points ago +34 / -0

I'll wait for Snopes to break the tie because I hear the founder stayed at a Holiday Inn Express one time

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
Desert_Covfefe 1 point ago +1 / -0

CDC has just as many conflicts of interest as cuckbook. Both censor and disseminate false information for private gain.

Rudy_DankMemer 7 points ago +7 / -0

the cdc is largely bullshit

How many vaccine patents does the CDC own?

Hanging_Chad 8 points ago +8 / -0


BerettaStroker 2 points ago +2 / -0


Italianshamrock 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’ve read 53

Sumarongi 1 point ago +1 / -0

All of them

Jaybird5 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was thinking the same thing. Is Facebook #ourguy for fighting the CDC?? Nah just kidding, to hell with ‘em both.

deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
LesboPregnancyScare 4 points ago +4 / -0

some 23 year old with a nose ring, ear plugs, skinny jeans, and full sleeve tattoos who microdoses censors the CDC or Front Line Doctors with more medical experience than he has been alive.

OGpsywar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Facebook, official fact checker for the CDC

If someone takes a fact and censors it / throws it out .. They're a 'Fact-Chucker'

(a bit like whatever cnt m•d shadowbanned/chucked out my previous comment)

permalinky to the phantom zone --

InRevelation12now 1 point ago +1 / -0

Facebook=LifeLog=Clowns_In_America & Zuckboy is a MKULTRA drone

Vsid 31 points ago +31 / -0

They already have been proven to be fake per the result of Candace Owen’s lawsuit. The Federal Court judge threw out her case because “No reasonable person believes Facebook “fact checkers” actually have any factual implication”.

Viva Frei and Robert Barnes Break it Down- Source-


SPEDMan64 29 points ago +29 / -0

That judge should post that decision on Facebook and Twitter.

Vsid 16 points ago +16 / -0

As it was explained by Barnes and Viva Frei, the judge was attempting to do Facebook a favor money wise by throwing this out.

Just thought of this now, I’ll check after work but if anyone can find that phrase in actual court documents and turn it into a meme, that would be a fucking golden killshot. Fact-checkers fact checking the judge saying they aren’t real news? If they declare they are actually news, then wouldn’t they not be protected from Candace Owens refilling that lawsuit citing their own words disagreeing with the judge in an appeal? Or anyone else’s lawsuit for that matter? If they don’t fact check it, they acknowledge that they aren’t legitimate. Which one do you think they’ll choose? Win, win either way.

Farmerbob1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do this. Might be a golden BB.

deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
Gadsden 12 points ago +12 / -0

No reasonable person.... Except the current administration uses them as an unofficial censorship arm of the government.

Femprep 6 points ago +6 / -0

Actually, a lot of people blindly trust. It’s so mind boggling. I got into it, on Facebook (don’t hate, use as rarely as possible) when the President’s accounts got banned. They were saying he needed to be held to account for what he was saying. It devolved into me censoring myself because fact checkers and the need to keep my account. But I said I was censoring myself for this reason highlighting why free speech is so important and how it hinders real conversation without it. I also asked how can you trust people you don’t know to overcome their own biases and look at information fairly. And they’re not even trusting Facebook employees because Facebook farms it out to a third party company. Do they know which?

Anyways, I basically opted out of the conversation after that.

Dictator_Bob 3 points ago +3 / -0

I had to laugh as I do agree with the judge. Except he should be impeached for using this context knowingly in error, or for gross incompetence. I'd like to see his tax returns for the next five years as well.

Pelides 20 points ago +20 / -0

As we’ve learned with the 2A, having lots of ammunition is pointless unless you’re able to remove enemies with it

TakenusernameA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unless your willing to use it.

Gadsden 9 points ago +9 / -0

I sited the cdc to management yesterday and got a fact check email in return.

Not even joking.

I work for the federal government. Hahahahahha

Moonman_Alpha 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah.. paid liars/propagandists are now "fact checkers" for the left. "That fact hurts my fragile feelings or directly opposes my political beliefs and party agenda, therefore, 'false'."