Comments (150)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
AbrahamLincoln 44 points ago +46 / -2

And in two months he'll prepare to issue another subpoena after they ignore this one.

PorchLightOn 19 points ago +19 / -0

My understanding (from comments made by Mastriano weeks ago) is that the laws in PA differ from those in AZ. I don't think they have to hold a contempt vote in PA before they can enforce the subpoenas. He implied they could go directly to enforcement by the Senate sargeant-at-arms.

Haven't tried to look that up yet in PA laws, so if others have better info, I'm open to a correction.

PorchLightOn 15 points ago +15 / -0

Adding, though, Mastriano also says he expects court battles after the subpoenas are issued. I'd just like to skip the frustrating "hold in contempt" circus they have in AZ.

P_Henrys_Brother 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mastriano comes off as a kick ass and take names kind of guy. I hope he doesn't put up with stalling tactics from the left.

PorchLightOn 10 points ago +10 / -0

You've got him pegged right. He knows this will be a process, but he's ready for the fight. I wish we had more like him in other state legislatures.

raptoris 3 points ago +9 / -6

But but after that he will send a strong worded letter!

deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
raptoris 1 point ago +1 / -0

Its just a joke, not meant to be serious. Just a metaphor supposed to reflect what usually happens, after those who blatantly ignore the laws without consequences.

grad16uc 1 point ago +3 / -2

This is your penultimate warning!

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0