1710
Comments (156)
sorted by:
117
deleted 117 points ago +117 / -0
88
deleted 88 points ago +88 / -0
79
Traiya 79 points ago +79 / -0

Is it even calculated for the actual vaccinated total?

I am half convinced they are lying about the numbers to make people feel more pressured to get it.

I mean, why not, they lie about everything else.

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
27
y_do_i_need_to_hide 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yes, they are absolutely lying.

19
Forbidden_outcast 19 points ago +19 / -0

Not even deep blue states are at 80%. They are around 65%, and only a couple of them. The rest are around 50%, with some around 30-40%- zerohedge article I read earlier

15
y_do_i_need_to_hide 15 points ago +15 / -0

I agree, but I don't think there's any reason to trust any set of numbers. Self-reporting is inaccurate, and we've proven that the medical establishment will lie about numbers. It seems like if they we're having that level of success they wouldn't need to bribe us.

9
TrumpOrTreason 9 points ago +9 / -0

I'm here in the San Fransisco Bay area...

In Santa Clara county (San Jose City area) ( 2 Million residents) 85% are vaxxed.

In San Francisco, +70% are vaxxed.

In Alameda County ( Oakland / Berkley) 75% are vaxxed...

The red counties are much lower.

https://data.democratandchronicle.com/covid-19-vaccine-tracker/california/san-francisco-county/06075/

Get the shots dems!

2
jjffiiippp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Link?

8
3
Angry 3 points ago +3 / -0

EVERYBODY needs to read that article!!!

1
PonySoldier66 1 point ago +1 / -0

still not buying the blue area

6
BlackPillBot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup. Peer pressure based off of lies, and half truths is so rampant now it’s disgusting. The worst part is that many Americans love it because it gives them their first sense of a faux power, control, purpose, and downright superiority for them.

23
DonJr2024 23 points ago +23 / -0

And it has a line for herd immunity which is utter bullshit. The flu never goes away. It just mutates. We have hundreds of covid mutations. There is no herd immunity and if there was, they would pay a lot more attention to antibody testing. If they wanted herd immunity they would let kids and young people build it (as they are NOT at risk. PERIOD.)

Don't let them pretend for one moment that they believe in herd immunity.

They will NEVER acknowledge reaching herd immunity even if it were possible.

9
Durdurdurkistan 9 points ago +9 / -0

It would just be more dots moved to the right. The red swath would stay the same even if trump won all votes in America. Which I'm going to argue he did.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
5
MustBeTrump 5 points ago +5 / -0

I need to see this compared to Covid deaths or cases.

3
libertyman 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would be great to see. Covid death's per county ranked by percentage of votes recorded for Trump.

51
bratt 51 points ago +52 / -1

Anyway to find out the 4 counties below 10%? I am looking to move.

40
bratt 40 points ago +40 / -0

Found it! Texarkana, Arkansas here I come.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, there are 21 counties nationally which have vaccinated fewer than 15% of their populations: Shelby County, AL; Winston County, AL; Miller County, AR; Charlton County, GA; Chattahoochee County, GA; Long County, GA; Cameron County, LA; McCone County, MT; Arthur County, NE; Grant County, NE; Logan County, NE; McPherson County, NE; Billings County, ND; Grant County, ND; McKenzie County, ND; Slope County, ND; Holmes County, OH; Harding County, SD; McPherson County, SD; Gaines County, TX and King County, TX In fact, four of these have vaccinated fewer than 10% of their populations to date: McPherson County, NE (pop. 494): 9.3% Slope County, ND (pop. 750): 9.1% McPherson County, SD (pop. 2,379): 8.9% Miller County, AR (pop. 43,257): 8.5%

26
vgorosh 26 points ago +26 / -0

But who are the 100% supercucks?

15
bratt 15 points ago +15 / -0

You will know the high vax counties by the stench. There will not be enough people to bury all the dead.

10
zooty 10 points ago +10 / -0

One man can operate a bulldozer pretty well. He'll probably need a government grant for the fuel though.

5
bigly4trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

i prefer a killdozer, preferably in the area of DC

1
DrVSGGEOTUSPhD 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it's probably nice leafy college towns

2
TP4bunghole 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just look for the hordes of homeless, shit smeared in the streets, and burning wendy's.

11
NukeTheNarrative 11 points ago +13 / -2

Lol. No wonder (((they))) so often have loathing for the southern states.

5
AmericanJawa 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yet several of those < 15% counties are actually from Northern states, from what bratt listed I count heavy representation from Nebraska and North Dakota with a little help from Montana, Ohio, and South Dakota.

4
lolpaladins 4 points ago +4 / -0

Based Amish

1
jjffiiippp 1 point ago +1 / -0

Western states not northern states.

1
AmericanJawa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Midwest, if you really want to get technical about it.

1
newuser999 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Lib media don't like to point out that its the poor minorities not getting their shots so they blame it on the overall states. Can you imagine if it was primarily white people who resisted and the media started spewing more anti-white shit (even tho this is false)?

1
bratt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks to be a cluster of states in the north central which are pretty based.

7
BerettaStroker 7 points ago +7 / -0

Holmes County, OH, is probly 85%+ Amish.

2
Walleye-vision71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Holmes county Ohio is all Amish.

14
fuckthealphabetsoup 14 points ago +14 / -0

Probably somewhere like Alaska where all 3 families living in the county are unreachable, but one of them married a dumb liberal cunt and she demanded the jab, for herself and husband. So 8% "Vaccination" rate.

4
bratt 4 points ago +4 / -0

One thing I consider is when vaccinated people start dying off, a lower vax ratio will be much easier to get rid of the bodies. Hey, I am lazy.

2
Danmax67 2 points ago +2 / -0

Asking the important question

24
impera 24 points ago +24 / -0

Herd immunity threshold marked here, as if ANY of the covid 'vaccines' contribute towards this. Pro tip - they dont, none of them do, and the manufacturers say so. Supposedly the one thing they do, is make the symptoms milder.

What does contribute to herd immunity? Getting the disease and getting over it. Maintaining levels of health. Fitness, exercise, diet, sunshine - all the usual things that always contribute to health.

For a year now, these fake vaccine makers and their stooges have hijacked the 'herd immunity' concept as a marketing gimmick. Appealing to a sense of civic responsibility to 'take your shot'. And its all a fraud.

11
603win 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yeah, that’s yet another BS goalpost. Remember before the 4th when that was 70%? Oh look, now it’s 85%, how convenient.

2
onestickyolo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude, if you could vaccinate 70% of the total population, you would GUARANTEE vaccine resistant mutations and this shit will go on like the flu forever. leaky vaccines (vaccines where the breakthrough cases are contagious) are exactly how you get vaccine resistant mutations. there are vaccines that are not leaky, in that they either 100% block the disease or breakthrough cases are not contagious. This type would block against all strains, similar to the common vaccines we get at birth. I have a feeling they want to vaccinate more people to ensure that there will be a never ending list of covids to get vaccinated from. Subscription model get a new shot every 6 months. Just like the flu, except people actually care about this one and it sells better.

Just add in the fact that they were literally doing the gain of function research in order to make vaccines and the fact that Bill "nye" Gates has been heavily invested and interested in vaccines and pandemics for a LONG time and this shit gets reaaaaaaallly fishy.

Also the vaccines don't even work.

23
Independenceforever 23 points ago +24 / -1

Someone show this to Trump's incompetent PR team

YOUR VOTERS DON'T WANT EXPERIMENTAL MAGIC SHOTS DONALD JOHN.

2
newuser999 2 points ago +3 / -1

Who cares of the expermental aspect. We simply don't need it and can think for ourselves.

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

You're not wrong, but it's important to hammer the experimental aspect, if for no other reason than to combat forced jabs.

1
ImportantPerson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why do you think that Trump's PR team hasn't seen this? Why do you think this data would change anything?

Here's the reality of the situation, republicans are smart enough to realize the difference between getting a vaccine because you are told to and getting a vaccine because it's going to actually be beneficial. So, you have high risk and elderly republicans who make up the red section that's vaccinated. That's exactly what SHOULD be happening. That's exactly what IS happening. That's exactly what TRUMP WANTED.

17
fuckthealphabetsoup 17 points ago +17 / -0

I love that there's basically nothing above the magical 70%. (By my count, 18 of 3,006 counties...)

Also, RIP that one retarded county that is actually reported as 100% (Statistically improbable, it's probably more like 98.99%)

55-60% appears to be the statistical peak average. Everything above being an outlier.

While the total average falls anywhere from 40 to 30%

Also, that "Red" County that's over 80% and voted nearly 60% for Trump... Sounds like RINO county.


So, what have we learned today? There's a direct correlation between voting blue, and retardation; Blue votes will do anything they are told to do by an "Authority" - won't question it, and they love to have public episodes when people disobey "The Rules"

6
lawlady1776 6 points ago +6 / -0

So, what have we learned today? There's a direct correlation between voting blue, and retardation

Thanks for the tldr lol

2
spezisapedo2 2 points ago +2 / -0

low number stats can get you to a real 100%. Some counties only have a couple dozen people. With that said, it may only be counting eligible people. So perhaps not included children under 12. Im fairly certain the size of the circle around the plot shows the number of people in the county at the top is really small.

1
TrumpOrTreason 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ah, but you're not considering WHO in the county got the vax....

It could be that most of the democrats got the vax.

These numbers how the head count, not by party. The party info is for the whole county.

Make sense?

So the 50-60% of vaxed in a red county, could be mostly made up of democrats, and few republicans.

0
jjffiiippp 0 points ago +1 / -1

There used to be standards that prevented most democrats from voting. No women and no non land owners. It was not enough or not the right type of qualifiers.

14
Grond999 14 points ago +14 / -0

"vaccination" levels are meh as the antibodies provide limitied protection and wane to 50% with 10 weeks. OMG...the fucking 'Fog of Medicine'.

11
Dylan_da_Spider 11 points ago +11 / -0

Anyone know what county that would be up in the top left with 100%?

22
IAbsolutelyDare 22 points ago +22 / -0

Cuck County, USA.

10
bratt 10 points ago +10 / -0

I read somewhere in the linked report, there was a county in Hawaii with 87 people that was vaccinated very early.

6
BasedRetard 6 points ago +6 / -0

Anusville, CA

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Unicron3 5 points ago +5 / -0

Old Roanoke. Explains the disappearances.

2
Jefferson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its a small county in Hawaii with 86 people, all vaccinated.

10
liberty4alll 10 points ago +10 / -0

I’m guessing the size of the circles represents the population. Isn’t it curious that, as a rule, big cities = Democrat. What is it about big cities that cause those people to turn Blue? Likewise, I believe people moving to small towns will turn that person Red. There is something fundamentally happening in cities that make people retarded. And I can’t find an explanation.

19
chickeninoven 19 points ago +19 / -0

Big cities = corruption/grift/gibs = Democrat magnets

9
Afks 9 points ago +9 / -0

100%, fren

Much harder to hide your shady actions as the size of the city decreases

Big city, lots of people to hide among, lots of funding to line your pockets with

Small town everyone knows what you’re up to

4
AngryMuffin 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you identify as one of the low% perversions then chances are you'll be "the only xxx in the town"; move to a city and the density means you'll find other perverts geographically close.

Combine that with the anonymity of a city and you have a recipe for the cesspits of LA, NYC, Seattle, SF, Atlanta, and Miami

Similar rule for low IQ sub-populations.

8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
2
Trumpenproletariat 2 points ago +2 / -0

The correlation between high-population cities and libtardism is international, even in countries where they have secure voting systems (using voter IDs and no voting computers).

5
HighVoltage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Fraud is a big reason these areas turn blue.

The other reason is that cities allow large portions of the population to generate income without actual work. When all one has to do to earn money is talk on the phone or shuffle paper in an office, one quickly loses the perspective that employment and work are not the same thing.

0
WhoMeTwo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Election cheating...

9
Groundpounder 9 points ago +9 / -0

Looks like a Hunter Biden painting 🥺

9
bratt 9 points ago +9 / -0

Looks like a rash on one of Hunter's girlfriends.🤮

7
Groundpounder 7 points ago +7 / -0

That rash doesn’t appear until Hunter is done with them 🤔

2
bratt 2 points ago +2 / -0

I assumed that fact was obvious.

3
Groundpounder 3 points ago +3 / -0

Probably fentanyl burns from doing lines off their buttcheeks

1
bratt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Those lines are the grid, the dotted and the diagonal.

8
NukeTheNarrative 8 points ago +8 / -0

What county voted 95% for trump and is only 9% vaccinated? That's where I want to live

3
Annpi 3 points ago +3 / -0

#metoo

1
LoneStarDangler 1 point ago +2 / -1

Poundmetoo

8
Bobthebuilderrrrr 8 points ago +9 / -1

What if they dont actually want you to take the vaccine. What if its actually not for covid19 and its actually for an unreleased virus that they planning to release which they will call a covid variant. Kill all the gun owners. Keep all the libs. Hmmmm. Thats how i would disarm a nation.

13
HighVoltage 13 points ago +13 / -0

I've thought about that too.

Either way, I still don't want these satanic luciferian fucks editing my DNA.

4
bigly4trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think what they are doing is pushing the NPCs/normies to get the vax, particularly "muh african americans" because they know the current level of government spending on welfare recipients is unsustainable. They want them all dead, but us productive people alive as tax cattle. The data is clear that Trump voters actually contribute the majority of economic activity in the US: Source

6
tabularasa_556 6 points ago +6 / -0

None of that lines up with their behavior. They are trying to unperson anyone who does not take it. If they only wanted libs to take it they would just support "free covid shots" or something like that so all the libs who already want it could get it and everyone else would stay away, as opposed to trying to prevent unvaccinated from entering stores or being able to work.

4
Saxmaster 4 points ago +4 / -0

Brain fog is the answer.

American Democrat voters are still a huge threat to the powerful because they are capable of waking up and becoming outraged if enough information penetrates their bubble. The elite don't see them as friends just because they happened to trust the mainstream up till now. The elites probably figure they might as well kill, maim, and give them brain damage while they're still vulnerable.

5
arkylady 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yuri did stress that the "useful idiots" will be the first to be lined up and shot because they will be the ones more likely to resort to violence once they realize they've been lied to. We already know they're lying.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
lolpaladins 1 point ago +1 / -0

Insects require too much co2 emissions, enjoy your soy

2
RedAltoids 2 points ago +2 / -0

That too is a possibility. On the other hand if depopulation is the goal, or one of the goals, why not take out the low hanging fruit first? It would get them out of the way when they come for the rest of us.

1
YoLLamaIsSoFat 1 point ago +1 / -0

Considering blacks and Hispanics make up the highest unvaxxed percentage of people, I highly doubt it.

6
Coolgenner 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s me , so far bottom right you can’t see me.

4
TehAgent 4 points ago +4 / -0

Except the data is based on a fraudulent election’s numbers.

3
WhoMeTwo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Also doesn't account for illegals.

2
WhoMeTwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thank you!

4
HighVoltage 4 points ago +4 / -0

A R^2 value of 0.42 is hugely significant in any study that looks at human behavior.

2
JustifiedTrumpian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can you elaborate?

2
HighVoltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sure, I'll try to give a short version.

Basically the R^2 (called "R-squared") value is arrived at by taking all of the data that you are measuring and trying to draw a line through it so that the line will be as close as possible to all the data points. This is a basic linear regression (because its a line) but there are also other types of regressions that can be more appropriate for other types of data.

When this line passes through the data, the line can be described by an equation. In a linear regression, the equation is simply y=m(x)+b. Here, the m is the slope, meaning how steep the line is, and the b is the number where the line will cross the y (up and down) axis. So with this info, you can create the line again. When you plug in an x value, the equation of the line will give you a y value. This is the basic foundation of predictive modeling because once you have data, you can plug in various x's and see what it might do to the y value.

This brings us to the R^2 value. As the R^2 gets higher and higher, the ability of the line to accurately predict a y value becomes better and better. A high R^2 value means the actual data are falling very close to the line. This is also called correlation because the more that things match the equation of the line, the more related they are.

In purely mathematical terms, the R^2 value tells you how much deviation to expect based on the independent variable. So a high R^2 means you shouldn't expect much deviation at all.

Now, for the graph that was shown by the author of this post, the two things being graphed are Trump support and taking Delayed Onset Lethal Injection, and the R^2 value of 0.42 would be low in some cases, but when we are dealing with humans it is actually very high. This is because humans have millions and millions of subjective valuations that they are constantly prioritizing and reprioritizing without even thinking about it, and the list of motivations is endless. So when a data scientest finds a correlation of even a few percent in social variables, this is generally cause for applause.

To get a higher R^2 value, the data scientist could pull in more data, such as religious beliefs, income, hobbies, or anything else they can think of. There is also a set of criteria for mathematically determining whether or not these new data variables are valid by establishing a thing called p-values.

I hope this helps.

1
JustifiedTrumpian 1 point ago +1 / -0

That was excellent. Thank you

1
HighVoltage 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're welcome, pede.

1
JoseyMontana 1 point ago +1 / -0

agreed. In marketing work, Madison Avenue would kill for a 0.1 R2 on a given campaign.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
HighVoltage 2 points ago +2 / -0

In human behavior, anything over a few percent is remarkable.

4
BoerboelMummy 4 points ago +4 / -0

How clever you Americans are - you've invented trash that takes itself out

4
Kholland65 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m convinced any sort of vaccine mandates are just a proxy to discriminate against conservatives. They know that is a company terminates 100 people for vaccination, 70% of them will be conservatives, so it’s a net win. It’s a socially acceptable way to purge the government of those who do not align with your political ideology.

This was always the plan that Obama set in motion. Trump was a speed bump, and now they’ve turned the heat up.

3
kernel 3 points ago +3 / -0

What's that one state with "herd immunity' and 90% fully vaxed so we can laugh when they get fucked just like everybody else?

3
NoYesYesNo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeap, but the scary part is Trump won 98% of the counties. So, a lot of Trump's voters are fucked as well.

3
StadiumHopper 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the "herd-immunity threshold" us unreasonably high. Traditionally virologists have placed viral infections from various flu and cold strains that include all Corona type viruses at around 60%. Also the graph assumes heard immunity by VAX, and does not account for simply system immunity from beating exposure to the virus. In accordance with actuarial science, and assuming HALF of actual PCR tests were anywhere close to value, and based on traditional rates of exposure for other equally contagious influenza strains, probably 150 million Americans or more were in contact with enough virus to require an immune system reaction. Tens of millions went undiagnosed and untreated for Covid19, and survived; and they carry that immunity with them today.

3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let me guess: that biggish dot at 14%/30% is one of the counties that Biden "won" using fake ballots.

2
SJBHamilton 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this with real or bogus election data?

2
MySidesGoUp 2 points ago +2 / -0

Liberalism is both a Disease and a Mental Disorder.

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like someone sneezed in a gay flag.

2
ParticleCannon 2 points ago +2 / -0

herd immunity threshold

Lol ok Variant Petri Dish

2
ZhaoBaiDeng 2 points ago +2 / -0

They never account for people who had it.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where are Maricopa and Fulton?

2
gbolcer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is that herd immunity correct? I thought herd immunity was:

1 - (1/Reproducibility) = herd percent

85% herd threshhold seems way too high. Maybe they intentionally are leaving out natural immunity? For current R0, most places have already achieved it.

2
WhoMeTwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Goalposts moved.

2
CaptainButthurt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im sure dominion style counters tabulate this data as well.

2
Cmchn 2 points ago +2 / -0

Columbia, SC! Tell the council to stop pushing the Vaxxx on us! You can use the personal contacts on my site to chew them out directly!

http://nojabcolumbia.info/

1
My2Cents 1 point ago +1 / -0

Science becoming increasingly politicized

1
coiffuse 1 point ago +1 / -0

bwahahhahahahhahah

1
coreyworks 1 point ago +1 / -0

I love how the only real casualties for the coof are going to be the NPCs

1
DicerningSword 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if antibody dependant enhancement and vaccine side effects where significantly more pronounced in some ethnicities. What if anecdotal information via rumor,stories and greater suspicion of institutions lead these populations to greatly avoid the notavaccine ?

How would the establishment that claims to best represent the interest these ethnicities react? How could that establishment react? The only way it could react would be by focusing blame and resentment on a scapegoat. That scapegoat being us..

1
MastaJoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, voters who love their country are less likely to take a “vaccine” that doesn’t work than people who hate America. Or People who hate America are more likely to kill themselves with a clot shot. Or People who support puppet regimes are more likely to become guinea pigs for an untested gene therapy experiment Or ...

1
friedchicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is really dumb

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

God, I wish I had refused to allow my grandma to take the jab. She wasn't going to take it then decided she wanted it after her cousin took it.

1
ninabobby 1 point ago +1 / -0

So does this prove Biden won those counties? Because if he didn't, wouldn't there be a bunch of "Biden" counties with low vax rates?

1
weAreStillHere 1 point ago +1 / -0

And you say the vaccinated people are going to start dropping dead in about 6 months? Hmmm.

1
The_Emperor 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this chart is accurate, it also means 29 counties were 90%+ Trump, while only 4 counties were < 10% Trump (presumably 90+% Biden)

Maybe Trump won!

Also, seems like you have Democrats shoving something in people's faces, and some communities don't like that, whether a BIden or a vaccination.

P.S. Talk to your Doctor, and decide if the Vaccine is right for you. I got it, and am doing fine, and never had the CCP engineered wu-flu-achoo.

1
y_do_i_need_to_hide 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just remember they added 10 to 20 points in the direction they want you to believe.

1
MythArcana 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found Los Angeles.

1
kernel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the fake herd immunity threshold when even the officials were forced to admit the vax does not stop transmission.

1
AngeredKabar 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like how's there's a lot more outliers on the blue didn't get side compared to red did get.

1
educatedandfree 1 point ago +1 / -0

120 million voters and associated family members.

No way we're even close to 60% jabbed..

1
TheMadManDidItAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would love to look at the outliers.

1
WhoMeTwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

WoW... Could you imagine the mass die-off in the West Coast/Hawaii, Mid-Atlantic & New England???

I could...

1
Megamagamanoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No wonder the border is open, the vaccine is killing off dem voters. The law of unintended consequences strikes again!!!

1
G_regulator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then funniest thing to me is breakthrough cases will be the norm because the vaxxed are so scared of covid they'll get tested Everytime they sneeze.

The unvaxed won't get tested until they're hospialised, which is rare in the unvaxed anyway.

So the vaccine is destined to fail miserably and eventually it'll kill off the democrats voting base.

1
AppalachianTactical 1 point ago +1 / -0

If thr included the number of naturally immune people, which gives better protection then how close to herd immunity?