3994
Comments (275)
sorted by:
183
SnarkyEdgelord 183 points ago +183 / -0

Freedom of association. Hang out with lepers even if you want to.

73
rainyday1234 73 points ago +76 / -3

1776

58
SnarkyEdgelord 58 points ago +58 / -0

Dress up like a slut or a cuck. Steal a bunch of vaccines. Dump them into the ocean.

2021

43
censored4wrongthink 43 points ago +43 / -0

won't someone think of the poor pharma industry and their bottom line?! this is madness!

22
rainyday1234 22 points ago +26 / -4

TRUMP WON

20
Donger-Lord2 20 points ago +22 / -2

BY A LOT!

8
rainyday1234 8 points ago +12 / -4

BIGLY

5
Donger-Lord2 5 points ago +5 / -0

YUGELY!

3
Leatherwood 3 points ago +4 / -1

WOW rainy, such enthusiasm. You have over 30 comments in this thread. I've been here since the beginning, and I'm pretty sure that I've never seen a single commenter with anywhere near that.

6
rainyday1234 6 points ago +11 / -5

YES HE DID .......HIGH ENERGY TRUMP RALLY TIME1!!!

9
3
rainyday1234 3 points ago +10 / -7

THANKS FOR THE LINK . NO WE SHOULD NOT

-2
FormerGraveheart -2 points ago +5 / -7

So one poster here finally stops posting all-caps, so another moron starts. Great.

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +7 / -6

REEEEEEEEEEE WAAAAAAAAAA

1
DJT_JR6544 1 point ago +3 / -2

So... why does that bother you at all?

4
SnarkyEdgelord 4 points ago +4 / -0

You can think about them as you throw their ass away.

0
rainyday1234 0 points ago +4 / -4

YEAH good idea

4
SnarkyEdgelord 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ideas are only as good as they get executed in reality. Take the idea, do it!

0
rainyday1234 0 points ago +5 / -5

LETS DO IT

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

no one will {hopefully}

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

WOW

1
Libertardian 1 point ago +1 / -0

F*CK FRAUDCHI!
.
Don't even listen to what he has to say! He's a lying psychopath who should be tried, convicted and hung for crimes against humanity.

10
War_Hamster 10 points ago +11 / -1

You'll turn the fish gay.

5
SnarkyEdgelord 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's their problem.

2
deleted 2 points ago +3 / -1
7
Kekintosh2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's enough to make General Coma'amder Milley send a Predator Drone

4
SnarkyEdgelord 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's why you dress up like their people.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

i like your based username^^ & your comment

2
rainyday1234 2 points ago +7 / -5

BOSTON TEA PARY 2.0^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

1
ColonelHughes 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we can get enough people.on board im happy to

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +3 / -4

MUZZLES DONT WORK BURN THEM

5
rainyday1234 5 points ago +10 / -5

1776

10
SnarkyEdgelord 10 points ago +10 / -0

Taxation without representation.

2021

-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +4 / -5

NO TAXATION WITHOUT REPRESENTATION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

6
SnarkyEdgelord 6 points ago +6 / -0

Guess it is time for the government that did not get elected fairly to go then.

0
rainyday1234 0 points ago +4 / -4

HANG EM

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

No representation without taxation either! Discount all illegal aliens!

-3
rainyday1234 -3 points ago +2 / -5

HIGH ENERGY

1
SHILL_DETECTOR 1 point ago +1 / -0

I choose dangerous fweedom!

I said that when i was 1 year old.

84
censored4wrongthink 84 points ago +84 / -0

Are we sure we don't have an Olympic mental gymnastics team competing this year?

36
realPhantomFuck 36 points ago +36 / -0

I'm consistently amazed by how retarded Fauci is... Like this can't really be serious

But then I remember we're in 🤡🌎

12
RegularAmerican 12 points ago +12 / -0

He's a high priest

5
GodEmperorBeerus 5 points ago +5 / -0

I AM THE SCIENCE.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd rather jump through some hoops than living in their slave new world featuring covid 1984.

1
rainyday1234 1 point ago +6 / -5

HONK HONK

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +2 / -4

HANG FAUCI

7
SHILL_DETECTOR 7 points ago +7 / -0

He should get put in a dark room to deplete his d3, and then have an illegal immigrant cough in his face, and then be denied real treatment, and then be given remdesivir and a mrna injection, and then be put on a ventilator once his lungs fill up wih water.

Livestreamed. Any doctor would do this today, it is the proper procedure.

1
Carry_Your_Name 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope he catches the CCP virus. He who slays with the sword must be slain by the sword.

22
Chopblock 22 points ago +23 / -1

The right of individuals to maintain good health is only possible if they are at liberty to make their own health-care decisions.

8
WakingKnowledge 8 points ago +8 / -0

The right to HAPPINESS!

5
SHILL_DETECTOR 5 points ago +5 / -0

Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness shall not be infringed.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pursuit of it. Very different.

2
WakingKnowledge 2 points ago +2 / -0

cannot even pursue it with all the damn road blocks. They will not let us be happy.

-3
rainyday1234 -3 points ago +2 / -5

BASED^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

11
rainyday1234 11 points ago +18 / -7

LOL ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^we have the best comments here dont we folks?

0
rainyday1234 0 points ago +6 / -6

some reddit cuck got mad at my comment

2
Inquisitor_Corvus 2 points ago +5 / -3

Fuck ‘em if they can’t take what’s coming!

4
Formerlurker92 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gold in every category

-4
rainyday1234 -4 points ago +1 / -5

KEK YOUR USERNAME^^^^^^^^^^

-4
rainyday1234 -4 points ago +1 / -5

YEP

1
TheAnon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems like it would be the only team to win this year.

65
BasedPresby 65 points ago +65 / -0

Not only this, but our standard is innocent until proven guilty. Unless you can prove that I'm corona positive you really don't have the moral high ground to say shit. You can stay home if you are afraid.

33
censored4wrongthink 33 points ago +33 / -0

why do you think cancel culture became a thing?

gotta prime the masses for communist behaviours

10
rainyday1234 10 points ago +14 / -4

THAT CALLED BRAINWASHING

7
bigly4trump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Your safety is your own responsibility. If these cucks are SO AFRAID of "muh DELTA" then you just stay the fuck at home and let the rest of society move on without you.

7
Steven_IDGAF_Miller 7 points ago +7 / -0

So much this.

Got in an argument w/ a co-worker the other day who was not only outraged that I refused the wuflu jab, but that I refused to put on a mask.

I told him that it was perfectly fine w/ me that if he did not feel safe that he was free to dress up in a mask, wear a face shield, and hermetically seal himself in a full body condom if he wanted to or just go home and never leave his house again. No one is stopping him. He doesn't need a gov't mandate to wear a mask if he wants to.

On the other hand, he has absolutely no right or authority to demand that I wear a mask for 'the protection of the vaccinated'.

Once again the argument of "if the 'experimental biological agent' works, then you have nothing to worry about, and if it doesn't work, what is the point of getting it?" went right over his multi-colored head.

2
epicsneeder 2 points ago +2 / -0

hermetically seal himself in a full body condom

hahaha, I'm definitely going to start using this phrase

1
GG_Escalator 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Also, even if you could prove I were Coronavirus positive, restricting my freedom to move freely and provide for myself is absolutely unethical and immoral.

In the midst of an "out of control" pandemic, people want to say they have a right to not get sick? That's not logical.

And if preventative measures aren't 100% effective, but the justification is "even if it saves only 1 life", but those measures can't guarantee saving even 1 life, those preventative measures don't even fulfill their purpose.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

YEP

48
Assassin47 48 points ago +48 / -0

IIRC there was some kind of deadly disease going around at the time of the revolution. Mortality rates in general were way higher then. Yet they never felt the need to include exceptions for "public health" in the founding documents.

28
jennyfrutex 28 points ago +28 / -0

Infant mortality rate was incredibly high, much of it due to illnesses like diphtheria and whooping cough. Measles and dysentery were deadly. There was even still plague around; it hit London in 1666 and Vienna in 1679. Infectious disease was much more of a present danger in 1776 than it is today. Back then, people took care of their families and looked out for their neighbors; they never would have let the government make these demands.

18
ALargeRock 18 points ago +18 / -0

Hard times makes strong men. Strong men make good times. Good times makes weak men. Weak men make hard times.

And around the cycle we go!

-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +4 / -5

YES THEY DO

-1
deleted -1 points ago +5 / -6
4
yukondave 4 points ago +4 / -0

"to aid in the execution of quarantine and also in also in the execution of the health-laws of the states"

The key words are "to aid". That means someone else is doing the quarantine. That was the states. It seems that the states have the right to quarantine according to the law. So if Florida does not want to quarantine someone, then the Federal Government would not be able to aid the state so could not create a quarantine.

A few years later the Supreme Court did in fact rule on the injecting of people in Jacobson vs Massachusetts.

Supreme court ruled that the state can mandate a vaccine in Jacobson vs Massachusetts BUT could not force you to take the vaccine because a fine was an option, they also exempted people that already had survived Small Pox since It was common knowledge that survivors of smallpox became immune to the disease. As early as 430 bc, survivors of smallpox were called upon to nurse the afflicted.

"Henning Jacobson refused vaccination, claiming that he and his son had had bad reactions to earlier vaccinations. The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court found it unnecessary to worry about any possible harm from vaccination, because no one could actually be forced to be vaccinated: “If a person should deem it important that vaccination should not be performed in his case, and the authorities should think otherwise, it is not in their power to vaccinate him by force, and the worst that could happen to him under the statute would be the payment of $5.”18 Jacobson was fined, and he appealed to the US Supreme Court."

2
spacecoyote 2 points ago +2 / -0

A volunteer army, who fought for independence at great risk to themselves and potentially others, including the risk from inoculation which was very real as they were literally rubbing uncontrolled amounts of smallpox and whatever else the "donor" might have into open cuts. Y'know, instead of deciding that "survival" was more important and giving up on the whole "liberty" thing.

2
GG_Escalator 2 points ago +2 / -0

In a time of war and on a battlefield, even if you get sick, if the enemy were to assault your position you better believe the CO will expect every able-bodied man to pick up their arms and defend themselves, the risk of infection spreading be damned. The Washington-Smallpox case is, imo, a bad example to justify mandatory vaccination. And wasn't it innoculation, not vaccination?

But back to the argument above, Washington took extreme measures** during a time of war**. We are not on a battlefield, and we are not engaged in a hot war. There is no rush to let nature run its course and achieve natural immunity.

1
spacecoyote 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. The virus is endemic and whatever theatrics people are forced to engage in is not going to make a significant difference in the progression versus letting it run it course. But we're told that to live our lives is to unduly risk people's survival, so we must submit fully to a cargo-cult called "the science." Living freely has always involved risk, and the founding ethos of America was that freedom is worth the risk. The real inoculation going on is an inoculation against that spirit, and into serfdom.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
8
War_Hamster 8 points ago +9 / -1

Smallpox, if I remember correctly.

3
deleted 3 points ago +7 / -4
1
Assassin47 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good context, I couldn't remember the disease. Don't mistake my comment for appeal to authority though. George Washington died of bloodletting. (unless that's another urban legend) And not as soon as the ink was dry, were governments doing things we'd consider unconstitutional. One might as well say "Hey the 2A isn't absolute, in 1795 some city banned black people and women from carrying rifles."

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

true^^^^^^^^^^^

36
p1smo 36 points ago +36 / -0

Violating a person’s rights to protect another person’s rights isn’t a very convincing argument.

15
ApexVeritas 15 points ago +15 / -0

Quite an astute observation, because taken to it's inevitable conclusion, it results in everyone's rights being violated for "the greater good". Its the exact same line of argument the left uses to try to ban guns: "if it saves just one life" or "it's for the collective good" or "dont you care about your neighbors/kids/grandma?".

It's a communist collectivist argument, and it ultimately means the government gains more power and gets to decide and enforce what's for the greater good, infringing upon everyone's liberties, and we all know how that ends up.

6
BigMikesIke 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank God we have so much history of communism and their egregious overreach otherwise we might just be susceptible to this shit. People are waking up the more and more this shit continues. This freedom boner stays hard and I’m not calling a doctor. I’ll live with it

30
Tramsec 30 points ago +30 / -0

Two people both want to go outside. One of them doesn't care what the other does. One will only go outside if the other is locked in a cage.

People like to shit on religion these days, but at least I learned when I was young that running around cutting babies in half is no way to run a society.

4
RegularAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

You were raised right

22
SPEZ_CUPS_CCP_BALLS 22 points ago +22 / -0

How about this...if you are afraid of getting sick...fucking stay home. How's that?

12
make_commies_good_ag 12 points ago +12 / -0

Problem is it has nothing to do with a cold. They just want an excuse to crack down on people.

12
RussianBot6969 12 points ago +12 / -0

They believe that the majority of non-vaxxed are Trump-supporters and that this gives them license to crush their political enemies under the pretense of "protecting people from getting sick." It gives them a sense of benevolence and moral superiority to their petty tyranny.

3
Ex-lib-learning 3 points ago +3 / -0

When in reality the majority of unvaccinated people are the blacks Latinos and poor people!!!

2
IvIA6A 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's funny is the celebs saying they're not getting it, or at the very least hesitant to take the jab because Trump cut the red tape needed to rush it out.

They're the first ones browbeating everyone to take it now.

2
Aquamine-Amarine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Correct, they just want to abuse their power.

-3
rainyday1234 -3 points ago +2 / -5

YEP^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +3 / -0

If I had to pick anything that could be of benefit to change about this, I do like the idea of making it more permissable for sick coworkers to stay home for a couple days and work remotely if possible. Genuinely, even before Covid, nobody really liked fucking Sneezy McSniffles in the office hacking up phlem on everything.

1
Steven_IDGAF_Miller 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even before Covid I was fairly lucky in my employer.

If someone came into work w/ a cold/flu/etc., their supervisor/manager would politely remind them that they had 10 days of paid sick time a year in addition to their regular vacation, personal time and holidays and 'wouldn't you feel better, sooner, if you chilled at home for a couple days and got plenty of fluids and rest'.

If for some reason someone ran out of sick time during a calendar year, there was a bank of time that was donated by the company for employees to draw from if necessary so they didn't have to dip into their personal time or vacation time allotment.

No disciplinary action was ever taken as long as if you were out sick more than 3 days in a row you got a note from your Dr. saying it was a legitimate cold/sickness.

More employers should take this approach, seriously.

22
Magakong 22 points ago +22 / -0

It's after the right not to be offended part... /s

-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +4 / -5

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

18
jennyfrutex 18 points ago +18 / -0

Why is the focus on "you have to take responsibility for everyone else!" instead of "protect yourself and your family?" I wash my hands, stay home when I'm sick, and focus on living healthy. I don't expect random strangers to keep me safe.

9
BarneyFrank 9 points ago +9 / -0

Because communism. How else are you supposed to get by blaming everyone else for your problems and personal failures?

5
ApexVeritas 5 points ago +5 / -0

As others have said, it's a communist and collectivist argument. Its ultimately meant to strip people's liberties and personal decisions, and give that power to government. The left thinks the government knows better, which also means they think everyone is stupid and should be taken care of. It's a personal admission of their own failures and wishes, and also shows that they don't trust their fellow citizens with liberty, to be able to make their own choice. It's quite a horrific admission when you think about it further.

5
ShadowyMrBlank 5 points ago +6 / -1

Collectivist thinking. You're just a functioning unit in a greater whole.

16
farstriderr 16 points ago +16 / -0

I will accept that logic if he can explain why spreading the flu or any other disease to vulnerable people and killing them wasn't "encroaching on individual rights" before 2020.

6
PraiseBeToScience 6 points ago +6 / -0

Or, why spreading AIDS isn't after 2020.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +3 / -5

CRAZY

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
0
rainyday1234 0 points ago +5 / -5

YEAH

8
M_A_G_A_2020 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sounds like a teenage commie trying to argue with an ancap.

Not that I even like ancaps, but they usually are very well prepared for rebuking moronic arguments like the one spouted by Fauci.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm having an ongoing debate with an Ancap who thinks the Constitution is a tyrannical document. He likes the Articles of Confederation.

He's wrong, but he makes very good arguments and I have to work pretty hard to score points.

It really comes down to one's view of humanity. I told him the world isn't ready for his worldview. Still too many knuckleheads among the population that we need to protect against.

5
M_A_G_A_2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

I like almost all points ancaps make except for one that to me, as a Christian, is deal breaking:

We are hurt by the wound of original sin and thus incapable of continuously and consistently making good decisions without the aid of peer pressure and moral laws and, of course, God's grace.

But when it comes to financial systems, why central banks shouldn't exist, why freedom must be front and center of human relationships I will side with ancaps on arguments 9 times out of 10.

I wish conservatives were lifting as much intellectual weight as ancaps are right now.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm pretty close to a Jeffersonian Classical Liberal and really only disagree with Ancaps on the reality of their vision.

We need as little government as possible, and just differ on exactly how limited the gov't should be.

I've made my anti central bank feelings very well known on this site.

4
PraiseBeToScience 4 points ago +4 / -0

My primary issue is that in 2021 it's obvious that corporations and governments are just as powerful and evil as they want to be. Under the auspices of what a "republic" looks like, an economy should be a government wolf and a corporate wolf voting for dinner, and a well-armed consumer contesting the vote.

Money is the single most corrupting force on the planet, and the AnCap idea that people will ever act morally or ethically if they have the chance to make money for doing neither is nearly as idiotic as the belief that Communism could work.

Like, communism was literally invented in response to the AnCap Robber Baron economies of the late 19th century. You remember, where workers were literally chained inside of the factories and if you lost your arm to one of the machines, you were thrown out on the street and you had better have a 9 year old kid at home to go work in the coal mines if you wanted to pay your rent that month.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +2 / -1

Excellent comment. Wish I had the time to give it the response it deserves.

2
M_A_G_A_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

So are you close to a minarchist then?

6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +7 / -1

I could pass for one on some topics, but I'm more of a pure Constitutionalist.

I'm a big believer in Localism and State Sovereignty, which I don't think quite matches a minarchist.

Let's just say I'm someone who really ought to be a delegate at a Convention of States, because I'd push to put the government back in its cage and the 16th and 17th amendments are on my hit list.

2
M_A_G_A_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

I like where you are going.

Any websites or readings you would recommend?

-3
rainyday1234 -3 points ago +1 / -4

whats that?^^^^^^^^^^^^^

2
M_A_G_A_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Minarchism is a political ideology which seeks to establish a form of governance in which state intervention is as minimal as possible while still maintaining a broadly functional society of which the general standard for "functional" varies from person to person. This form of governance is called a Minarchy or a Night-Watchman State."

https://polcompball.fandom.com/wiki/Minarchism

They are usually shunned by ancaps as "half-measured" libertarians. They strike me as a modern term for classical liberals although I am no expert and have no authority to actually compare both and say which is which.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's more SovCit than AnCap, but their relationship is like a 'birds with feathers' logic. Not all AnCaps are SovCits, but all SovCits are AnCaps.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +2 / -1

And this is why I try not to get too caught up in labels. They are useful, but sometimes not as accurate as they need to be.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

All you need to know is that AnCaps are retarded, SovCits are insane, and since all SovCits are AnCaps, that means SovCits are insanely retarded.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
7
cisvader 7 points ago +7 / -0

But...you can infect another person even if you're vaccinated...even if you're both wearing masks...even if the other person is vaccinated...without even getting into "super shedder" scenarios...so by that logic...by coming with the airspace of another person....for any reason...you are possibly infecting them...and thereby depriving them of their individual rights. And they of you, for being in your perambulatory path. In short: all humans need to disassociate from each other and plug in to the Matrix so we can be spoon fed a virtual life by people who think men can lactate.

6
Jecovidwitness 6 points ago +6 / -0

But if your employer or government forces you to take a dangerous vaccine, that’s their right, according to the left. Find another job. Find another country. Let them rape you with a needle.

6
Conservativechick 6 points ago +6 / -0

Such a stupid premise - every time you get in a vehicle you run the risk of killing someone. Does that mean the government can confiscate all of our vehicles?

Better yet, every time a BLM or Antifa member leaves the house, there's a risk of burning, looting, and murdering - does this mean we can lock them all up forever?

3
RussianBot6969 3 points ago +3 / -0

Moreover, why should the logic of their argument simply be limited to COVID? The same case (or better) can be made about influenza, measles (a vax that the crunchy types in LA opposed pre-pandemic, btw), and pretty much any other communicable disease or mildly dangerous action. If this is the standard we are using, human interaction is impossible

1
Ex-lib-learning 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s not a great example because the gov does require a license, registration, seat belts, etc.

1
Conservativechick 1 point ago +1 / -0

My dad was absolutely irate about the seatbelt laws - and now I see why.

It is up to us - "We the people" to decide what is and is not an acceptable restriction for the benefit of others. There is no right to be perfectly safe in every particular - because that is impossible. Our Constitution requires the government to operate with the consent of the governed, We need to remind them of that.

6
Gosh_darn_hotdog 6 points ago +6 / -0

IF you are infected, IF you don’t have symptoms, you MAY infect someone who MAY be vulnerable.

And you just might be the biggest fucking fraud ever perpetuated in the history of civilization.

Tell me again about asymptomatic transmission you cumquat.

-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +2 / -3

BIGGEST FRAUD

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Rights are conferred to the people, against the government. A right conferred by the government, isn't a right at all, it's a law.

People who don't understand this should be hung upside down by their toes until they do.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +1 / -3

AMERICA FIRST

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +4 / -1

Genocidal maniac with a Napoleon complex works for me.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +1 / -3

TYRANT

-1
rainyday1234 -1 points ago +2 / -3

HANG TYRANTS

5
women_for_trump 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see he's still trying to push this "asymptomatic" spread bs. "This disease is so deadly and devastating that you could have it and not even know it!"

In 100 years people will be laughing their asses off at us.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +1 / -0

In 100 years they'll probably be too busy mining uranium in a Chinese mine to have time to laugh.

4
blueeyephoto 4 points ago +4 / -0

if that's they way you want to play it, i'll just bring up the CA law indicating I cannot be held liable for intentionally infecting someone with an STD.

4
AlphaOmaga 4 points ago +4 / -0

You cannot compel others to provide you your “rights”. That’s not how rights work. What the fuck is wrong with these people.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
LarryBugman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Replace the word “essence” with “clown world” and it makes sense.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +2 / -4

HONK HONK

3
ravonaf 3 points ago +3 / -0

I heard the fake stream media repeating the "right not to get sick" yesterday. That's the deep state's new narrative. I never knew that was a thing. EVERYONE gets sick. There is no such thing as a right not to get sick. What about children who get cancer? What happened to their rights? What about the elderly who get Alzheimer's? What happened to their rights? They are coming for us friends. Pray to God that you have the strength to resist.

3
EagleOverTriumph 3 points ago +3 / -0

Getting sick is actually better for you to get non lethal illnesses to make your immune system stronger. With people having been working from home for about a year and some change I imagine we'll have a lot of people getting sick and having worse reactions to the sicknesses like the cold and other common things like that.

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +1 / -3

YOURE RIGHT

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fact is, even if you're a good driver, never had a ticket, and always drive the speed limit, you may very well crash into someone, so in essence you're encroaching on their individual rights just being on the road.

1
nankingRoastie 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree.

There is no end point to this logic. If you eat food, you are encroaching on someone else's right to survive, because your competition for food raises the price and maybe they get priced out of it.

3
2Kings616 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fauci's rhetoric is that of a wife beater at this point. He abuses people and then blames the abuse on them not doing enough.

I'm done feeling guilty, Dr. Fauci. I answer to God and not you; and He cares for me a heck of a lot more than you do.

3
AppalachianTactical 3 points ago +3 / -0

They have the right to stay home. Why is the onus on those who arent worried about covid to stay in and protect those who are afraid of getting it instead of staying in.

By his logic their decision to go out is encroaching on my rights and that has greater consequences because a group of nazis is trying to force medical shit on me.

3
Formerlurker92 3 points ago +3 / -0

Medical martial law

-2
rainyday1234 -2 points ago +2 / -4

YEP

2
Lila_Quartermaine 2 points ago +2 / -0

I call bullshit on the whole idea of contact tracing. Unless everyone was tested every day, then it's just another charade. It probably works as a theory in a clinical study of animals but it can never possibly work on the human population.

Trying to identify and blame individuals for transmission of airborne diseases is ridiculous. Blood borne diseases may be more traceable.

1
nankingRoastie 1 point ago +1 / -0

im so glad you're convinced to reduce or remove the penalty for people giving others aids.

2
tobeselfevident 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh look Fauci is a law doctor now!

2
Msmcontrolsnarrative 2 points ago +2 / -0

But giving someone HIV, not so much, right Fauci?

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

I love how in the last week, they've completely memory-holed that they were outright saying that vaccinated people, with 100% certainty, could still catch, incubate, grow, and spread the virus, and that the vaccine would only insulate them from severe symptoms.

2
PepesCovfefe 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s impossible for this line of reasoning not to extrapolate out to masks have to be worn by everyone all the time forever permanently.

2
zooty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm reminded of the dark judges from Judge Dredd where they came from an alternative dimension where they decided that since all crime was committed by the living, they'd simply execute everyone. And did.

2
daty_dato 2 points ago +2 / -0

That person who may be vulnerable has the right to stay home.

2
OnlyTrump20 2 points ago +2 / -0

No one has the right to breathe in my own exhaled air. They are violating my personal space if they do. LOL.

2
sustainable_saltmine 2 points ago +2 / -0

no symptoms = no ability to infect. "asymptomatic spread" like "delta variant" is a Catch-22. They don't want you to find a way out of Covid until they're ready to let you out so yeah all you who got the vax thinking we'd let you have your freedom back? LOL NOPE. "We're all in this together, remember!"

2
lolzor21 2 points ago +2 / -0

I LOL"D very loudly when he said this with a straight face.

1
BobSux 1 point ago +1 / -0

So Fauci has encroached on others’ rights every year pre-2020 by not wearing a mask during flu season.

1
Paxelmania 1 point ago +1 / -0

probably the argument is 'right to life' trumps 'right to liberty'

but if you don' tactually die of the sickness then it doesn't end your life, being bedridden is a brief loss of liberty for being a weakling

1
BurtMcGirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anyone who is scared can stay home. Quit fucking with those of us who are not.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SecedeNOW 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Doctor" Fauci has a problem with logic.

1
Stanwyk74 1 point ago +1 / -0

So at this point the vulnerable either jave the vaccine or don't give a shit if they get a mild flu. So what is the problem? They never answer this. What exactly are we trying to prevent here besides freedom?

1
Ricky_CIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fraudci needs to swing.

1
HK417 1 point ago +1 / -0

That works both ways, these stupid fucks can't even.

1
SorosHasBallsackEyes 1 point ago +1 / -0

What about my right to not be offended? I am offended by the notion that I need to be guided by the government.

1
Jmradioman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, real harsh take on aids doctor fuckface.

1
barwhack 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fauci is the sole reason for my complete loss of faith in public health.