Comments (16)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
anon073121 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not really a right. But you definitely had legal president to argue with them and any force or turning you away for a service you had paid for you potential had a law suit on your hands.

CucksForTheDonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

* precedent

anon073121 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thanks was getting really late and I was exhausted...

Mr_Beanths 2 points ago +2 / -0

They must have been referring to Trump, our Legal President.

deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
CucksForTheDonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

One of our handicaps is that lots of "edumacated" people have spelling and grammar biases, i.e. they will outright dismiss claims if they're spelled incorrectly.

This is to their detriment. Because of this bias, they will only accept content from institutions that have editors, and most of these have been compromised.

But it's also to our detriment because it prevents us getting important points across, which is somewhat necessary to save civilization.

Watermelons 1 point ago +1 / -0

There's good reason. How can I trust anything you write if you can't get certain basic things correct? e.g. lose/loose, they're/their/there, it's, its. These things get drilled into you at public indoctrination camps. If you haven't learned these, I assume you have an IQ < 80 because you failed to learn. How can I take anything you say as factual if I think you're retarded?