3332
Comments (174)
sorted by:
111
Johnny_Dangerously 111 points ago +111 / -0

Here we go....Going to blame "depopulation" on us idiots that took IVM. Sure, uh huh, right...ok...

60
Specter 60 points ago +60 / -0

Now I know we’re right. They’re projecting again

18
based_trekkie 18 points ago +18 / -0

^ THIS

^ THIS

^ THIS

12
CAIndependent 12 points ago +13 / -1

1000% this. Whenever the left says the right is doing something, it's been projecting: -me too -racism -tax evasion -voter fraud -this

the list goes on and on

4
Zepp87 4 points ago +4 / -0

Literally every damn thing they say is a lie. Everything. It's ridiculous

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Next they're gonna say we're already building the extermination camps for the left.

8
ceremony_ 8 points ago +8 / -0

Not only are you correct, there's a deeper more horrible ramification of your comment.

Was the "jab" known to affect fertility and cause sterilization?

Is the sterilization card being played because that's what people will start seeing in several months?

3
dixond 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes.

2
yukondave 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nigeria! I know a guy that is a prince that has money in a bank in Nigeria and all I have to do is give him my social security, copy of my ID and bank account number and he will send me the money. Love Nigerians

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
4
TommyLasordasBallBag 4 points ago +4 / -0

/u checks out

6
Skadouch 6 points ago +6 / -0

All bullshit. Been doing lots of reading and watching breakdowns of china-cuff and IVM. Watched this yesterday. While I'm not a fan of the youtube, it's still the best video source (for just the mass volume of content).

Ivermectin Toxicity Reviewed https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATiX0-2PEr4&t=1420s&ab_channel=PeakProsperity

3
Colonel_Chestbridge 3 points ago +3 / -0

The study being referred to took place in the shithole of Nigeria, treating 37 participants with river blindness who took large doses of ivermectin every day for 11 months straight.

1
tchouk 1 point ago +1 / -0

And there was no actual long term results

2
NimbleNavigator20202 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ah yes. For the Most Part, Dr. Martenson is Baseeeeddddd

3
yukondave 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nigeria, known for its medical research...

2
Frestpost 2 points ago +2 / -0

certainly known for being a test ground for vaccines that kill

2
RedLeadredemption 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually waded into the Reddit swamp and saw it’s the top post on his, but the top voted comment actually said this story was bullshit

56
Spooky_Lunch 56 points ago +56 / -0

This is a lose lose for them. Either they're lying (the most likely option) or they have been knowingly sterilizing the world for years.

30
Jimbo28a 30 points ago +30 / -0

...and if it does 'sterilize' (which it obviously doesn't), why would they even bother reporting it, since the people being sterilized are us Fascists?

31
FiatLux 31 points ago +31 / -0

because they know thats why we dont want the jab in the first place because of the sterilization... so they turn the whole thing on its head and serve it back to us. every fricking time...

18
y_do_i_need_to_hide 18 points ago +18 / -0

This is the answer. It pisses us off because we looked, it fools people who have only heard part of the story.

3
SuddenlyClintoned 3 points ago +3 / -0

That, or so they can blame the vaxx sterilization on IVM folks ala. atrizine.

4
Deadpoolnormiefan271 4 points ago +4 / -0

Projection is there greatest weapon, because they don’t care if the are wrong 90% of the time. They know the herd will forget about anyway.

3
ViaToil 3 points ago +3 / -0

Saying it sterilizes men could prompt crazy woke people to go out and start downing the stuff like candy... My first thought however, yeah.. they would stay silent and even endorse it big time if it actually did sterilize men. Since, it is talking about a group that takes large doses, long term.. I can see it maybe, though.

4
Brucesky420 4 points ago +5 / -1

Who did the research? When was it done? Who funded it?

Anyone got a link to this paper? and is it peer reviewed?

2
Colonel_Chestbridge 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com/articles/effects-of-ivermectin-therapy-on-the-sperm-functions-of-nigerian-onchocerciasis-patients.pdf

It is peer-reviewed, though published in an incredibly low impact journal. Study done in 2011. Shithole in Nigeria. Total of 37 participants with river blindness. Took ivermectin for 11 months. Infertility has never been a reported side effect of ivermectin in any human trials.

There are some other animal studies showing that it could possibly cause morphological changes of sperm after taking it for long periods of time, but nothing significant.

4
tchouk 4 points ago +4 / -0

The study isn't about fertility. It's about sperm quality directly after a course of the drug.

And if Ivermectin can be used to temporarily lower sperm quality in a controlled fashion, you've basically got the male birth control pill.

Wonder drug of wonder drugs.

1
QuantumReality 1 point ago +1 / -0

No wonder they've been giving it to Africans by the billions

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
37
y_do_i_need_to_hide 37 points ago +37 / -0

The science is clear. The vaccine is sterilizing women, possibly men. People are starting to notice. Ivermectin is great as a prophylactic and helps to cure covid. Therefore we must be told that Ivermectin causes sterility. It's science

11
iorek 11 points ago +11 / -0

We've known projection as one of their favorite tactics.

2
PasEggBuster3 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you blame other dude for the crimes that you do, that's projection.

When you virtue signal while being irresponsible, that's projection.

4
GodDamnedEngineer 4 points ago +5 / -1

PLEASE PROVIDE ANY EVIDENCE YOU HAVE OF STERILIZATION OF WOMEN.

4
y_do_i_need_to_hide 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bro, I said the science was clear. That was the metric for closing your business and removing your rights. It will work here as well.🧐

1
Grond999 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are concerns at this point. The situation requires more study: https://covid19.nih.gov/news-and-stories/covid-19-vaccines-and-menstrual-cycle

1
SilverStarv5 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spike proteins cluster in the ovaries. What they do in the ovaries isn’t publicly known yet.

1
GodDamnedEngineer 1 point ago +1 / -0

IF WOMEN WERE NOT ABLE TO GET PREGNATE ON ANY KIND OF SCALE SURELY IT WOULD BE KNOWN BY NOW WOULD IT NOT?

1
SilverStarv5 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s see

3
PraiseBeToScience 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ivermectin is great as a prophylactic

we must be told that Ivermectin causes sterility

The sterility was reported in a small sample of people who were taking it as a prophylactic for 11 months.

If you won't take the vaccine because you don't know the long-term effects, but you're literally eating horse paste every single day because you're scared of the slanteye sneeze, you're a fucking idiot. Ivermectin very well could cause sterility if taken long-term like that.

Stop taking it as a prophylactic. You don't live somewhere riddled with worms. It's people like you who actually do end up in the hospital. Taking antibiotics for a year would kill you too, because they kill off all your gut flora. That doesn't mean not to take antibiotics, it means only take them when you actually need them.

3
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Another thing: I'm concerned the other 98.13% of horse paste ingredients are "proprietary". Why are people happily gobbling it up without knowing the rest? If it's just filler, why does the company refuse to state what it is?

2
y_do_i_need_to_hide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Small sample and wide reporting means it's made up. Sometimes it isn't, but on balance that's the answer. I've been having better success since I changed my axioms. I now start with the assumption that the medical community and media complex want me and my kind dead. It's not foolproof, but it beats the average.😁

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
Smurfection 20 points ago +20 / -0

My guess is that the ivermectin sterilization scare is being rolled out by the globalists because they think the "spike protein collects in the ovaries" is nothing more than a political hit job. They don't care about the science of anything or the consequences of the jab. To them it's all a game of point - counter point, spin, and spin some more. So, there's actual medical data that suggest 75% of the spike protein leaves the injection site and spreads throughout the body and collects in the spleen, ovaries, bone marrow etc so now the clotshot apologists want their propaganda equal and opposite reaction.

0
JS_Mill 0 points ago +1 / -1

sources?

3
Smurfection 3 points ago +3 / -0

For what exactly? Dr. Byram Bridle is the doctor that announced the spike protein leaves the site of injection and spreads throughout the body and collects in the spleen, bone marrow and ovaries.

1
JS_Mill 1 point ago +1 / -0

The studies. Not a chain of hearsay.

17
GenesisFiveTwo 17 points ago +17 / -0

Sort of like when my brother’s wife told him he she wanted him to get a vasectomy after their third kid. He told her “ok but you’re giving me the best pick up line in the world.” She did not like that.

11
Whimpy13 11 points ago +13 / -2

If she doesn't want to have more kids shouldn't she been the one getting a sterilization? Imho it sounds to me she doesn't want to have more kids with him.

3
WhiskeyDreams 3 points ago +5 / -2

Ones reversible and one isn’t. She could change her mind later on and they can still have kids if gets a vasectomy.

3
Whimpy13 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't know that. Thanks for the information.

7
Husky 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's not entirely true. In perfect conditions some can be. But most are permanent.

3
SuddenlyClintoned 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's about 50%.

Doctors will lie to you and say it's nearly 100%. But statistically the 'reversable' one is a slight majority at 50-53% successful reversal.

2
Klown_Schwab 2 points ago +2 / -0

can't they like, extract sperm directly from the testicles?

2
belil569 2 points ago +2 / -0

No it's really not. The odds I was given was 1/10000 it is reversed when I got mine

0
GenesisFiveTwo 0 points ago +1 / -1

Having a vasectomy is much less intrusive than a hysterectomy. .

3
bg4u 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sure, but is it less invasive than tubal ligation? That would be the proper comparison. Not a hysterectomy.

14
7thGenTexan 14 points ago +14 / -0

Ivermectin has been used for DECADES on livestock and horses. No rancher would use a product that sterilizes their livestock. We’ve all had ivermectin soiled on us for decades. Not sterile.

1
Megascandal 1 point ago +1 / -0

The worst I've heard is it can cause temporary infertility in birds treated with it.

Hasn't stopped the chicken industry from using it so even in more sensitive animals if there is something that can cause infertility it is very minor.

11
anduril 11 points ago +11 / -0

20% are Chads?

15
JeremiahKassin 15 points ago +16 / -1

I mean, Africa does have a whole country of them.

6
SSYM69 6 points ago +6 / -0

Their president died a hero on the battlefield trying to rally and motivate troops. Savage.

4
Astra 4 points ago +4 / -0

President of Chad, no less. Gigachad.

3
BewareOfThePug 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is the wae

1
Itstimeforguillotine 1 point ago +1 / -0

Always.

11
JoggingLooter 11 points ago +12 / -1

How are white people going to feed that many dindus? That many africans is not sustainable.

11
sometimescanbefunny 11 points ago +11 / -0

There are 1 billion starving Africans because we fed 400 million starving Africans.

4
JoggingLooter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yup. That is not sustainable for the earth. We can't have half the world's population being fed by 3% of it.

2
ViaToil 2 points ago +2 / -0

They have plenty of land to farm on and feed their country, they always have had, they just fail at it all the time (though, mostly it is because of outside influence that keeps tricking them into failing all the time and have bought up a lot of the farmland and are not using it FOR Africa..)

4
JoggingLooter 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's not outside influence. They are tribal people with low IQs that are always at war. Farming isn't going to happen. They will flood europe and demand money constantly.

3
LonelyLadypedeSF_CA 3 points ago +3 / -0

The people won't wait for harvest - they pull up the plant and eat it.

2
ManfredH 2 points ago +2 / -0

The warlords don't help. You build a farm, and raise some produce or animals with your family working together to try to turn a profit so you can keep doing it year after year.

Then a bunch of guys come along with AKs and take your kids, livestock, and produce then fuck off to go get killed by some others guys over the hill who come by later and demand just as much, only it's all gone now and they don't care.

Not every farm in Africa is like that, but far too many are. Savagery begets savagery. Child soldiers grow up, assuming they survive, and turn in to warlords too. The process repeats.

1
BewareOfThePug 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blackberry flavour Soylent?

9
WeaponizedSmirk 9 points ago +9 / -0

That was ONE "study" of 32 people. It's complete bullshit. The Left needed that story so they could feel superior.

2
Anonymous_leopard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably bought and paid for BS. Certain countries in Africa get easily issued visas because they work with corruption. Virtually none of them are SubSaharan Africa (except South Africa) because those have low Muslim populations. Non Sub Saharan Africa countries are almost all Muslim controlled. Nigeria, Somalia, and Ethiopia governments work through corruption with our government and our nonprofits and global entities to do whatever they want them to do or say. That's why you only hear about certain African countries over and over. The "refugees" from those same countries are the rich oppressor class, basically African democrats.

1
BeefyBelisarius 1 point ago +1 / -0

And it was a study on sick people in the 3rd world. Never mind the decades of clinical data.

1
UberPatr10t 1 point ago +1 / -0

385 men. 37 were left without sterilization.

0
PraiseBeToScience 0 points ago +1 / -1

It was also in people taking it for an entire year, which is not how you're supposed to take it.

Like it or not there are some parallels here. We definitely have some rock-stupid people who will believe that ivermectin is a miracle drug that cures everything, and are also lowkey paranoid about Covid, who will eat a tube of horse paste every day and think they're going to be immortal. People that dumb do exist.

7
CSIS_CIA_pure-evil 7 points ago +7 / -0

Here is the study:

https://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com/articles/effects-of-ivermectin-therapy-on-the-sperm-functions-of-nigerian-onchocerciasis-patients.pdf

37 people with river blindness that were on Ivermectin were tested. This isn't much of a study and it concludes that we should look further. Is it repeatable? Is it reversible? What affect does dosage have.

Also, if this widely used drug worked as birth control in Africa, we would know about it.

6
posedgeclk 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ah, so they already had worms in their balls, the the Ivermectin killed the worms. River blindness is some nasty stuff. If you have it badly enough, killing the parasites swiftly can actually do more harm than good.

2
CSIS_CIA_pure-evil 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hadn't thought of that. Those worms are in more than just the eyes - that is only where they are most problematic and noticeable.

3
UberPatr10t 3 points ago +3 / -0

No, 37 out of the 385 were not sterile after the study.

3
citizen666 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. 385 people treated for parasites with awesome horse goo. Of those, 37 were eligible for further study—and those 37 are the subject of the study.

1
CSIS_CIA_pure-evil 1 point ago +1 / -0

"We therefore investigated the effects of ivermectin therapy on the sperm functions of these eligible 37 diagnosed patients of onchocerciasis who were of ages between 28 and 57 years. "

"We observed significant reduction in the sperm counts and sperm motility of the patients tested. "

6
Skabliggum2 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'm past the age of having kids anyway, bring it on.

5
malkontent2024 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also fake and gay.

4
ParadigmShift2070 4 points ago +4 / -0

but I thought they wanted to depopulate whites, why would they want to stop them eating horse paste? it's the same bullshit 'why won't you get vaccinated to protect yourself?? I wish you antivaxxers rednecks would just die already!'

4
IntrepidBurger 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are they... are they projecting vaccine side effects into ivermectin???

1
SHILL_DETECTOR 1 point ago +1 / -0

sure they will

all the people that are sterilized by the vaccines will be like @[email protected] WTF when the media starts reporting that people are sterilized but saying its only IVM people

4
LazySusan 4 points ago +4 / -0

Leftists know that conservative men tend to be masculine. Therefore, they invented a lie that ivermectin will take a piece of your manhood. It's just another lie.

3
HumblePede 3 points ago +3 / -0

Note the dichotomy.

One sketchy study re Ivermectin/infertility is touted as major cause for concern while many peer reviewed studies re Ivermectin/successful treatments are ignored.

They do not play fair. They will not play fair. They are propaganda mongers.

3
FTR22 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is total BS. The media knows it but doesn't care. The only depopulation event that is happening are the jabbs. Pure and simple.

3
finscreenname 3 points ago +3 / -0

If that was the case Planned Parenthood would be air lifting pills to the population.

2
Formerlurker92 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is anyone else concerned by that curve?

2
FreddyThePatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because only 20% of men fuck

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
repoman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Blame your enemy for which you are responsible for.

2
PhantomShield72 2 points ago +2 / -0

JFC - they're really making this argument?

2
malkontent2024 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because of white supremecy... duh

2
paulej 2 points ago +2 / -0

Whatever this is about, my guess is that somebody tested to see what happens when one ingests a large quantity of ivermectin. Like drinking too much water can kill you, everything must be done in moderation.

1
PraiseBeToScience 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is what the abstract suggests. However, there are absolutely people (you can even find them in this thread) who sound like they are literally sucking down horse paste like it's Gogurt because they think it's a miracle elixir that will give them eternal life and cure everything.

If you took antibiotics for a year, you'd literally shit yourself to death.

I genuinely don't care if someone is feeling sick and wants to choke down some paste like it's vegemite, but it's the people who are taking it every single day who will hurt themselves and ruin it for everyone.

2
utfanx2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because we send them billions in food, water, and medical aid. Their every need is taken care of, so they've got nothing better to do than lay around and fuck.

4
Anonymous_leopard 4 points ago +4 / -0

All of the money stays in the government and none is dispersed to anyone whether it's from governments or NGOs. Do you really think foreign aid goes to oppressed people or that the poor are actually receiving anything they don't work to get in Africa? I'm a us citizen but have a home in rural Africa. Let me know when you find an African food pantry and then tell me how people get there with no roads and no cars. Most Africans spend 75% or more of their money on food and rural people raise their own meat and milk. Same reason they can never vaccinate rural Africans. No roads and no refrigeration.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Doc57 2 points ago +2 / -0

"IF IVERMECTIN "STERILIZES 80% OF MEN", WHY THE AFRICAN POPULATION IS GROWING SO FAST? "

sex

between a man and woman?

not a fake woman or fake man.

or delusional gender dysphoric morons who believe they are not the gender born as.

3
ViduusMAGA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Next you’ll be telling us those kids are alive. Stop spreading far right conspiracies.

1
Doc57 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK, I'll bite,

"Next you’ll be telling us those kids are alive. Stop spreading far right conspiracies."

WTF is your point, and how does that go with what I posted?

1
ViduusMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bad abortion ban joke. “They’re fetuses not living kids”

You’re making me have to respect biological gender. Next you’ll be making me admit life is…um..life.

Ok, I’m going back to triple masking and mowing my lawn with an electric lawnmower now.

2
Doc57 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alright I apologize, face Washington DC, say 16 wholly joes and send congress a bag of dog farts as a penance for disavowing the false truth of sacramental misgendering.

Check back later for directions on the deadly art of lawn maintenance or how not to infect your centipede grass with covid

1
RememberIssacKappy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Imagine being so fucking evil... that you create a smear campaign against a medicine that helps people.

Satanic pedo bastards.

1
HulkHogan42069 1 point ago +1 / -0

The African population is growing so fast because they’re being propped up by foreign aid. Their growth isn’t sustainable and providing aid is more of a cruelty than a blessing.

1
holytrpbatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Who will be the new Sally Struthers?

1
OnlyTrump20 1 point ago +1 / -0

It depends on what it's being taken for. The coof spike protein will specifically attack the male gonads because they contain ACE2 receptors. So taking medicine to attack a virus (or parasite) that's already in the gonads will bring the anti-viral battle to the gonads.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Norenia 2 points ago +2 / -0

Except for when being used specifically for the treatment of river blindness. But yeah, completely safe at the right dose in all other scenarios.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SuddenlyClintoned 1 point ago +1 / -0

(when dosed properly) ((and overdose takes 20-30x recommended))

I imagine with IVM in the news, some asshole is gonna pull a HQCwherr they 4x the dose and say it did harm. (HCQ is more sensitive to overdosing than IVM)

1
sleepingbeautyc 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's the trans men. See all the cis men have lowered sperm, but the trans men's sperm has reduced 0%.

1
GeoG85 1 point ago +1 / -0

What if we apply Liberal Projection,

and anything they acuse of Ivymertin, apply it to the ClotShot?

The ClotShot sterlizes 80%+ of men?

Indeed.

1
GreatHumungous 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they’re saying Ivermectin sterilizes you, confirmed fact that the vax sterilizes you.

1
holytrpbatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

It only takes 20% of the men to impregnate 80% of the women. Lol. Idiocracy IRL

1
Induceddrag 1 point ago +1 / -0

If ivermectin made men sterile, the left would be forcing it on anti-vaxxers.

1
Tom94 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd take my chances for being sterilised by ivermectin oppose to the vaccine that fills your nuts with toxic spike .

1
sir_rockness 1 point ago +1 / -0

I could hire a kindergartener to make a gay graph like this for me in 5 mins lol

1
Frestpost 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is good, I can see the board meeting now:

"OK, we have to convince these anti-vaxers that ivermectin is bad...what can we use?"

"Well John, they seem to think the vax causes infertility, and thats a reason they won't take it"

"GREAT, WE'LL USE THAT!"

they literally think we're fucking idiots.

1
barronwin 1 point ago +1 / -0

because the 15% that arent sterile fuck like rabbits

1
Thrasymachus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just wait until our economy collapses and the aid stops: that purple line is going to go in all sorts of funny directions, and at angles that may surprise you.

1
BlitheringIdiot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Confirmation Bias.

1
45454545454545454545 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry but all you based horse-paste users are going to have to get women preggers asap to prove the lying media is wrong.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
R3tro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am ok with this… it means i dont need to pull out anymore…. Just keep pumpin…

1
Candygram_for_Mongo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Look at all the studies to pick over on "unproven" (40 years) vaccine treatments. Ignore the few studies of the truly fake vaccine mRNA, ignore the side effects, ignore the deaths.

1
NimbleNavigator20202 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone explain/send a link to this "80% of men" claim? Absolutely Rediculous

1
Goldlight 1 point ago +1 / -0

at this point I think europe needs to die

1
holytrpbatman 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. We need to re-arm many of them. Oh wait. We just gave a full military to the Taliban.