Comments (14)
sorted by:
4
chicago_prisoner 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope, not real.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
2
RabbleRabbleRabble 2 points ago +2 / -0

ya I want to know why 90% of their sample size already had low sperm count.

Were the 10% normal going to have low sperm count anyways from the original disease? Maybe they were just the 10% who were the most early in their infection.

3
lmharvath 3 points ago +4 / -1

Seriously you troll! Get off this patriot venue! You are transparent like your evil leaders! ALERT! ALERT! Fauci lover resides here!

1
1776ThereIsaidIt [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Lighten up Francis. I was mocking the claims of sterilization. If it made men sterile a tube of Ivermectine would make vasectomies obsolete. That was my point.

2
1776ThereIsaidIt [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good lord people! It's called sarcasm.

1
DaLoneVoice 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would like to know how many of the 300 had been vaccinated twice. We know the vaccine causes problems in fertility, Ivermectin does not!

1
DriftingGrifter 1 point ago +2 / -1

Did you read the Nigerian study?

3
PabloPicasoArt 3 points ago +4 / -1

The Nigerian study is fake news. Get the real info about Ivermectin and how it is safe and effective.

https://files.catbox.moe/drfp2d.jpg

0
DriftingGrifter 0 points ago +2 / -2

You mean to tell me that albino sperm aren't legit? I'm shocked.

1
1776ThereIsaidIt [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

My point is that all these doctors doing the procedures could simply prescribe Ivermectine. Right?

1
DriftingGrifter 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yeah but just like the vaccines, they couldn't make profits off of it.

3
1776ThereIsaidIt [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

This pede gets it.

1
DriftingGrifter 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I didn't get it at first, but I'm catching up.