3308
Comments (247)
sorted by:
277
EuropeanRepublican 277 points ago +278 / -1

NEWSOM...The first governor to survive a recall with more than 100% of all votes.

171
Fignugent 171 points ago +173 / -2

you're forgetting that some people are bi

they can vote as male AND female. quit hating u bigot shitlord

78
CuckS1ayer 78 points ago +78 / -0

Maybe I should vote with all my 57 genders next time.

26
ColeDedhand2 26 points ago +26 / -0

That's cute. The numbers up to 67 now. This is why you bigots lose elections.

24
vegeta_ban 24 points ago +24 / -0

See you’re a right wing nazi, they’ll throw the book at you!

/sarcasm

20
Whimpy13 20 points ago +20 / -0

There's a Swedish politician who got a bribe trip and claimed his trans personality took it. 🤡🌍

His gay partner were then found out to be a pedo.

9
becky21k1 9 points ago +10 / -1

I told people to do it this time.

6
BLMARETERRORIST 6 points ago +6 / -0

No wonder they've been putting for trans rights.

23
Torrvarpen 23 points ago +23 / -0

I identify as 100 people, now send me 300 ballots 🤡

2
CrispyQuesoSalami 2 points ago +2 / -0

Centenarary Tricloptan Multi-vote Kin of Colour?

13
thelawmat 13 points ago +13 / -0

My cat identifies as a trans-species migrant transsexual. She cast 9 mail in ballots. More power to my pussy!!!

5
Reefay 5 points ago +5 / -0

More power to my pussy!!!

Kamala has entered the chat

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
7
Mount_10_ear 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lol ...I love this

1
XERIPHYTE 1 point ago +1 / -0

They want you to believe that the people agree with his mandates. There is only one way to remove a tyrant.

133
VonTyger 133 points ago +133 / -0

Nice find. California is about as democratic as North Korea and will be less free at this rate.

62
Chuggatrumptrain 62 points ago +62 / -0

Don't go insulting North Korea like that

105
TEXinLA 105 points ago +105 / -0

440% to 5312%.

Yup.

54
Urusovite 54 points ago +57 / -3

5300%, 1000%, 440%, 140%, 110%, 1030%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 100%, 200%, 100%

Such garbage. So obvious. Nobody will cover it.

46
theflabmaster [S] 46 points ago +46 / -0

I actually found a few that have votes with no registered voters in the precinct. Which are technically infinite%

17
fazaman 17 points ago +17 / -0

Wait... Let me check that math.

Hmmm. 50 votes divided by 0 ... Well shit. My calculator just exploded.

9
AngryMuffin 9 points ago +9 / -0

Time to upgrade pede, my democrat calculator can calculate an infinite loop in less than than three seconds, extrapolate vote counts to what it feels they should be, and bonus, it's fully vaccinated (Pfizer, Moderna and J&J with boosters, and AstraZeneca and Sinovac coming soon)

Only downside is that it smells bad, and will spontaneously combust if I get too close to a church or a courthouse.

8
fazaman 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh, you're right. I forgot my calculator was racist.

5
Brucesky420 5 points ago +5 / -0

I tried to buy one of those but they required me to be vaccinated so I spit in their face

I guess if I want one of those dem calculators bad enough I could go to california and steal one from CVS with no repercussions

1
Fourtyandfourtyfive 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was gonna purchase also, but the child safety warning label was sooooo long...

Like anything democrat, it’s a danger to small children.

78
theflabmaster [S] 78 points ago +78 / -0
17
Toohershat 17 points ago +17 / -0

Thank you!

10
ItsOkayToBeWight 10 points ago +10 / -0

That's a very low number for registered voters. Sure your data is accurate?

12
SCP0073 12 points ago +12 / -0

I wondered the same thing. 8 registered voters in the precinct? That’s way too small

4
Brucesky420 4 points ago +4 / -0

Shouldn't this kind of data be public? Surely we could check it against the california numbers

haha just kidding, what point does it make if we get the numbers from a source who is being accused of fudging the numbers. Welcome To America!

1
ItsOkayToBeWight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sometimes you can catch an organization out on their lies as often they're sloppy and forget to fudge ALL the numbers.

3
silent_majority_LA 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm from Ventura county, there are 800,000 people in the county.

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

And the table in the linked source indicates 500k registered voters which checks out.

8
leing15 8 points ago +8 / -0

That page says that precinct 2004 has ZERO registered voters, and of ZERO voters, TWO people voted?

Many of those precincts have absurd numbers, but at least the others had a reason to have mail-in and in-person activity. If in precinct 2004 there are ZERO registered voters, why was it even sending or receiving mail-in-ballots, or why was it open for voting in person?

1
anewpatriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you very, very much for providing the source.

62
impera 62 points ago +62 / -0

425 ballots cast by just 8 voters? Whats the chance that at least 417 of these voted NO to keep Newsom?

I'm sure that police are enroute as we speak to arrest the entire precinct for vote fraud... any second now.... any second...

46
DickTick 46 points ago +46 / -0

Better yet how does a precinct in California have just 8 registered voters?......

55
Owl_Eyes_Alpha 55 points ago +55 / -0

Those are the only actual US citizens lol

5
gillonba 5 points ago +5 / -0

What difference does that make? This is California we're talking about

23
DonJr2032 23 points ago +23 / -0

It's a precinct of Ventura County. The county is broken down into lots of small little sections, some are very rural

16
impera 16 points ago +16 / -0

Very good question.

I cant find where precinct 2000 in this county is (Ventura appears to be county 111 on the below list) but there appears to be available geographic data available on precinct boundaries.. here:

https://statewidedatabase.org/d10/p20_geo_conv.html

Maybe some clever people have figured out how to transpose these over some maps, or there are ones already made up that I cant find at the moment.

9
theflabmaster [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

I was able to map the precincts in google earth, but the numbers still don't match the actual election website data, https://i.imgur.com/0VGvo6g.png

2
impera 2 points ago +2 / -0

Very cool! If I had to guess, this precinct would be a tiny sliver of color adjacent to a big and presumably very low populated section. I dont know why it would get its own designation but being CA, probably for no good reason.

8
theflabmaster [S] 8 points ago +8 / -0

Precincts might be in the middle of farm land, or the mountains. Few people live there. https://i.imgur.com/0VGvo6g.png

7
Corn_Pop_Is_Bad_Dude 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's my parents county. My dad said that his mail in ballot said he can 1 mail it, 2 drop it off in any drop box in the state or 3 vote in person at any voting center within the county. This pdf on the website says that precincts are to have no more then 250 voters, designated by state law. https://recorder.countyofventura.org/elections/precincts-and-districts-information/

Has anyone asked Mark A. Lunn for a precinct list that corresponds with the location numbers? My only guess to explain this is that those precincts could be the sheriff's office, library or local school. And instead of voting at their own precincts, people voted there. 🤷‍♂️

2
theflabmaster [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Only mail ballot precincts. Not a precinct with a polling station.

By California State Election Code a mail ballot precinct can have no more than 250 voters. Mail Ballot precincts will appear in areas of the county where the population is very low. Because the populations of these areas are so small, the California Election Code does not require the Elections Division to provide a polling place.

1
Brew_Dude 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't forget the industrial/commercial zoned areas.

6
ufkyflflfguio 6 points ago +6 / -0

Usually those are government building areas or industrial areas full of warehouses.

1
yep__yep__yep 1 point ago +1 / -0

BREAKING : Investigation stalled for two more weeks. Need to vote on it really quick.

46
HanginChad 46 points ago +46 / -0

And we used to make fun of North Korean and Iraqi dictators getting 99% of the vote. A 99% vote is more probable than a mathematically impossible 5300% turn out.

10
CaptainButthurt 10 points ago +10 / -0

We're America. We do everything bigger and better.

46
CabowaboFL 46 points ago +47 / -1

So why did Larry Elder concede? Doesn't make sense.

71
Scuffers 71 points ago +71 / -0

Because the RINO's told him it was the republican thing to do?

33
Toohershat 33 points ago +33 / -0

They probably did make clear to him that they'd be offering no help or support if he fought this. But I really have no idea what's going on in his line of thinking.

14
Captain_MAGA 14 points ago +14 / -0

Isnt Newsome up for reelection next year anyway?

22
lixa 22 points ago +22 / -0

Yes. Gee I wonder if they’re planning the same thing.

18
559throw 18 points ago +18 / -0

There is literally zero reason to not do it again and forever more. Republicans had their chance to stop this shit and they just cowered in fear.

6
KickingPugilist 6 points ago +6 / -0

They didn't cower in fear, they actively support it. They're the illusion of choice.

5
UnusualPepe 5 points ago +5 / -0

who in the right mind would contest against this atrocity next year?

18
Jemmy 18 points ago +18 / -0

The thing is, that doesn't matter. He's not the only candidate running and doesn't have sole say over giving up on the first question to recall.

15
maniacal1 15 points ago +15 / -0

I don't think he expected to win, I think his actual goal is exactly what is happening. He forced them to over-play their hand, and now CA looks like a fucking joke AND more and more people are waking up to the blatant election fraud happening in every Democrat state and stronghold.

10
TheRealTurdFurgeson 10 points ago +10 / -0

He didn't concede. Where did you hear that nonsense?

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
11
TheRealTurdFurgeson 11 points ago +11 / -0

And there's your problem. Elder hasn't conceded nor has he announced that he has conceded. You're being brainwashed.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
1
covok48 1 point ago +3 / -2

Trump didn’t concede either and who’s the current president?

5
TheRealTurdFurgeson 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's not the point. Rumors spread that Elder conceded even before the fucking polls opened on election day. That sort of disinformation can kill a campaign. Paid for by Newsom no doubt.

3
Geeee 3 points ago +4 / -1

He backstabbed Trump and claimed he lost fair and square. Oh well.

28
Jemmy 28 points ago +28 / -0

The counter narrative to this will just be that CA has same day registration and they're still processing it. They'll just hope you forget about it in a few weeks.

12
Keiichi81 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep, those 8 registered voters just had 53 children each who all conveniently came of age the week of the recall election and registered to vote same-day. Don't you know hispanics traditionally have large families? Bigot!

10
becky21k1 10 points ago +11 / -1

The counter to that should be to pull up the demographics for the precinct and determine if there's even that many people eligible to register living there.

8
DonJr2032 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes, that's the provided excuse they are now able to use.

1
GaTechGrad 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Every provisional ballot counts"

22
COCOMOJOE 22 points ago +23 / -1

I have been thinking. why don't we rig one of the elections so they do an investigation into it only to pull up more shit they did then whatever little thing we come up with?

17
lixa 17 points ago +19 / -2

People get mad at me for this on here but I think us rigging elections/countercheating is the only way to win at this point.

17
IronMaiden 17 points ago +17 / -0

Except we don't have the entire system on our side. We would be investigated and arrested within a week.

6
gillonba 6 points ago +6 / -0

Not likely. Surely if the left ever rioted the FBI would spare no expense to track down everyone who was in the city on that day and imprison them for months without bothering to charge them... Or if the left ever stormed the capital, maybe to protest a supreme court nomination, they would be crucified in the media as the worst terrorists in the history of terrorism

1
acasper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely.

2
fazaman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right. They have the cities, where the number of voters allows them to hide large amounts of fake voters more easily.

1
hillaryforprison 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's almost all under democrat control, because government control is their religion. Conservatives generally dislike big government and oppression, so the ideology itself puts conservatives at a disadvantage even though there's more of us.

0
Olds777 0 points ago +1 / -1

Because you're an idiot. The RINOs have absolutely been rigging elections and primaries as well. Lindsey Graham is the best example as they've been pulling all sorts of shenanigans in SC for a long time. The uniparty won't investigate itself, but will eagerly do everything they can to stop outsiders.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not suggesting the rhinos rig it. I suggest Trump gets it rigged. And that wasn’t even anyone’s objection, it was moral and “optics.”. And fuck off with the personal insults. Can’t you make your point without resorting to that?

-1
Olds777 -1 points ago +1 / -2

You weaken Trump by acting like a criminal and associating yourself with him and criminals are worthless. The left is able to rig the elections, because they're the ones counting the votes.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is pigeon logic. Countercheating is not immoral. “Criminal,” technically we are all labeled criminals now as they change the rules. People attending Jan 6 are now criminals. One is a criminal being in a store without a mask on. I’d rather think of it as what is right, and certainly letting the world suffer in order to uphold going by the books is foolish. You can’t beat corruption of this magnitude by playing fair. What’s the point of it if we never can win another election to right things. I hope playing fair keeps you alive. So far it’s not working out very well.

0
Olds777 0 points ago +1 / -1

You're either a shill or so afraid that you're giving in to ridiculous levels of desperation, when you going out and cheating would hang Trump and our movement. The Democrats want someone else to be holding the bag for their cheating that becomes more and more apparent. Elections have been rigged for a long, long time and our best weapon is to expose the fraud which is what is going on.

1
lixa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not a shill take a look at my history on here. I am absolutely very afraid. And it is not ridiculous to be afraid. I just watched it happen again where I live in CA, which doesn’t give me much hope for 2022/24. I don’t mean I am personally going to cheat. I’m saying I would support Trump if he had it somehow set up to counter their cheating worth his own (not to get fake votes but to course correct) and I think that may be what it takes. I certainly hope it can work out for us another way.

10
becky21k1 10 points ago +11 / -1

"We just did what you Democrats have been doing, because apparently that's okay. Here's examples A through ZZZZ of Dems doing this."

9
deleted 9 points ago +11 / -2
7
Jimmyjetfuel 7 points ago +7 / -0

Promoted to manager, You must work where I work!

1
COCOMOJOE 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know my ideas are the best!... lol

7
559throw 7 points ago +7 / -0

Because that would just be an isolated event and does not indicate widespread fraud.

They did it before and got away with it so this is how it is now.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
COCOMOJOE 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya like that!

16
Buck_Fiden 16 points ago +16 / -0

Those are White House YouTube Channel dislikes kinds of numbers.

14
Overtaxed 14 points ago +14 / -0

And we poke fun when people like Kim jon Un get 99% of the vote.

13
RentedMule 13 points ago +13 / -0

I'm not saying fraud didn't exist, but less than 10 registered voters in two of the precincts? That seems a little fishy. Especially in a County with over 846,000 residents.

12
Pleepleus 12 points ago +12 / -0

Got a link to the sauce for further digging?

10
2
Pleepleus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks.

1
Wakenbake 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fuck is this source? .coms reporting ballot results?

https://electionresults.sos.ca.gov/returns/maps/voter-turnout

10
wiseracer 10 points ago +10 / -0

8 registered voters? seems pretty easy to canvas that precinct.

7
Seenev 7 points ago +7 / -0

I'm from Ventura. It's a fairly conservative area for California.

1
Iremembermypassword 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can you call up your local officials and confirm if the precinct map or number of registered voters are correct?

5
Ayur 5 points ago +5 / -0

“The recall was the most safe secure recall in the history of recalls... period..... REEEE!!!!!!” 😂😂🤡🌎

5
Jduufiisjhxhgd 5 points ago +5 / -0

We no longer have a country. Our only chance is a mass world event like a major world war or something that is equally as fucked as Covid, but that would solidify common sense somehow.

5
shadows_of_the_mind 5 points ago +7 / -2

Is there any kind of data validation being done here bc you can just slap some numbers in Excel and say the turnout is severely tilted.

10
theflabmaster [S] 10 points ago +10 / -0

Dude I posted the source link like 9 times in threads: https://archive.is/3fkxZ

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see 100% multiple times and other cases as high as 440% .... WTF is that dude. XD

I hope you seriously do something to fix this sh*t.

5
Independenceforever 5 points ago +6 / -1

do you just bitch all the time about the work of others or do you ever have anything to contribute?

my guy this is way out of line. LOOK IT UP.

that's scientific method - YOU CONFIRM IT YOURSELF.

buncha fools here trying to hen-peck people much smarter than them and it's a smoke in my nostrils

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +2 / -1

Lol buddy it’s a fucking Internet forum. Anyone can say anything. That’s why you trust, but verify. Doing my due diligence to verify OP’s claims is perfectly ok.

And OP already followed up with the source of his data so, who’s bitching now?

5
LostViking1985 5 points ago +5 / -0

CA allows same day registation, that's what this is. But, wanna bet some activists just happened to show up in those precincts and talk some old ladies into handing over their ballots to them? Do you have any idea how easy it is to lost complete custody (and fully legally so) of your mail in ballot? There's like 3 different fields for allowing someone else full control of that ballot.

5
Jduufiisjhxhgd 5 points ago +5 / -0

All you need to vote for someone else is their name, DOB, and zip code.

5
mytummyhurts 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mail in ballots go brrrr

0
engineerdon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Gotta give that one an updoot.

4
SensibleViolence 4 points ago +4 / -0

Whoops! Decimal error. It’s always some tiny thing I screw up. We will have the bugs worked out by 2022.

4
WhitePortugese1 4 points ago +4 / -0

Might be an unpopular opinion but I cant help but laugh at the fact that Larry Elder who doesnt believe in the fraudulent 2020 election himself got cheated out of his election.

4
Gravity 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those are rookie numbers. You gotta pump those numbers up!

4
RiceCrackerUnited 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one fucking cares about facts man. The next step is blood and guts and its going to suck and we will all probably die or be tortured or disappeared into some camp. Fortunately, if you walk with Jesus you'll have everlasting life.

4
Nighknight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Math is Raaacisssst

4
Teach4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

So the way that this works is that precincts don't have assigned voters. This precinct had 8 people that live within the precinct vicinity but more people voted there than are "assigned" to. I voted in my a location other than my precinct but still within my voting district.

Likely still are some shady numbers there but this is somewhat normal

4
BostonVoter 4 points ago +5 / -1

Where does the data on the website come from . ?

Can we call the manager of the town ?

How do we know what precinct 2000 is or what it means ?

4
theflabmaster [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

https://archive.is/3fkxZ

I've been looking for info on where the actual precinct is, and of course they don't share that info.

3
BostonVoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cause I wanna call and talk to the person and cross reference numbers with the person in charge.

3
theflabmaster [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah I just found maps of all the precincts, but none of them match the numbers given for the election results. They re-districted every precinct right before this election it seems...

1
FunnyValentine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know for a fact that Clarity Elections is Georgia's official source for disseminating election-related information.

For all intents and purposes, "Clarity Elections" means "official results".

4
TheMAGAlorian787 4 points ago +4 / -0

What the fuck? Is Elder fighting this?

1
TheEnclave89 1 point ago +1 / -0

No.

3
BettyBlue76 3 points ago +3 / -0

How are there so few voters?

1
theflabmaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Some precincts are in the middle of farm land, or in the mountains, very few people might actually live there, or vote. See the map https://i.imgur.com/0VGvo6g.png

4
ThurstonHowell3rd 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seen any "Cattle For Newsom" signs in that neck of the woods?

2
BettyBlue76 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then wow. Very good find.

3
johnqpublic864 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's why we need to do what they're doing. Print a billion ballots and stuff the boxes so much that it wrecks the system.

3
suitcasegate 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dead people votes matter

3
ArcticDark 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nah if I identify as 784 genders, i get to vote for each one. One identity, one vote.

3
J_Dubya_C 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was able to locate the precinct on google maps. You can compare it to the precinct map from the County of Santa Clara Registrar of Voters Precinct Map. It appears to be a the Skyline Ranch Christmas Tree Farm.

https://goo.gl/maps/XjDzdbYfvCnqECpm6

https://stgenrov.sccgov.org/precinctmaps/pct%202000.pdf

1
ActNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

OP states this is in Ventura County. That's about 340 miles away from Santa Clara County. Is there more than one precinct 2000?

3
SomeDudeGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

"AbSolUtElY nO eViDenCe" - you'll never get anywhere until the corrupt media is brought to heel. They will just repeat this line, no one will believe them, but they'll have the illusion of majority consensus against you. Even then, bringing the msm down might not be possible because they have the backing of some of the world's richest international bankers.

2
trayvon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wish it wasn't so funny, because its seriously horrible.

This math somehow would make sense to the mentally destroyed CCP flu propaganda victims.

2
Pumpitrealgood 2 points ago +2 / -0

The psycho globalists view Commiefornia as their stronghold, and if they lose that, they lose the entire enchilada, the election fraud here was also very likely staggering. Once you have election fraud go unpunished, that just reinforces the behaviour, and that is precisely what this election was, a Big Fuck You to the plebs.

2
AmazinKrackin2 2 points ago +2 / -0

CA is a joke.

2
scott31337 2 points ago +2 / -0

There’s more than 8 registered voters in a precinct. Making a BS excel spreadsheet doesn’t prove shit.

I know DNC cheated but this is useless and makes our side look “conspiracy theorists”

2
Registered 2 points ago +2 / -0

Truth and data no longer matter. Surely u know that?

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Plsdontfireme 2 points ago +2 / -0

THIS IS SIMPLE. MAP THE PROCESS. IDENTIFY THE RISKS. IMPLEMENT CONTROLS. AUDIT THE CONTROLS. EASY.

WHAT HAPPENED TO EXPLAIN THE ABOVE ISSUE? Maybe:

  1. VoterA registers at precinct 1
  2. VoterA sees precinct 2 on their way to work and drops their ballot there.
  3. Precinct 2 now has more votes than registered voters. WHY!?!

We need elwction officials to prove where the votes came from. Is every precinct over 100%? Can we trace VoterA to ensure they didn't vote in multiple precincts? THESE ARE SIMPLE QIESTIONS WITH SIMPLE SOLUTIONS. DEMAND YOUR COUNTIES IMPLEMENT ELECTION CONTROLS, AUDITS, AND PUBLISHED FINIDINGS.

1
Plsdontfireme 1 point ago +1 / -0

FLOW CHART:

How Votes Happen:

  1. Ballot returned via mail
  2. Ballot returned in person
  3. Provisional ballot requested in person

Follow the ballot, ID risks at each step, implement controls, publish controls, audit controls, publish findings. EZ.

Soo... for option #1, ballots returned via mail Step 1. voter registers to vote with their county What could go wrong here???

  • voter registers multiple addresses or wrong address
  • voter registers but isn't eligible to vote
  • etc.. etc... we can crowd source all the bad situations and defend them.

Sooo voter could register multiple addresses how do we control that risk?

  • voter has a unique identifier tied to their registerstion (Drivers License, SSN?) And the system confirms only one ID per registrant.

Ok so theres 1 control (there could be many control to address 1 risk or 1 control to address many risks)

So how do we audit that? Well we look at the registration list and identify any duplicate IDs and investigate why they exist (i.e. they shouldn't and if they do the system is broken).

Then we publish the findings so the community can comment and say "wait but you could cheat this way!!! How are you defending that risk!?!?!"

Easy. Make me supreme leader and it will be done.

2
Swolehas 2 points ago +2 / -0

How are their only 5 registered voters in a precinct?

2
muhlum24 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t doubt the fraud but this looks like someone just threw some numbers into a spreadsheet.

1
theflabmaster [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ctrl-f "source"

2
ZeroG1515 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Nothing to see here" "Carry on plebs" "Don't mind the people stealing ballots" "Don't mind that people were forced to cast provisional ballots because they "already voted" but claimed they hadn't" "Dont mind that ballot envelopes had holes in them so we could see how you voted before opening" "Don't mind that we have a super majority, we would never use our power to rig elections"

2
KekistanPM 2 points ago +2 / -0

ThAt IsN't PrOoF oF fRaUd!

2
BelfordBob 2 points ago +2 / -0

Say it ain’t so?? They are as stupid as 2020 Going over registered voter totals. 😂😂😂

2
lavebug 2 points ago +2 / -0

how many precincts total in california?

2
Insanejub 2 points ago +2 / -0

From Ventura and know people who worked at the polls. They said that they were trying to kick out Republican poll watchers again and that you had to hide the fact that you were a Republican poll worker else they would closed you off to anything even mildly essential in the whole process.