Comments (342)
sorted by:
PoohClimbsTrees 315 points ago +316 / -1

They are full of shit, aspirin has been around longer than we have used fetal cells for testing.

Japan4Salt 137 points ago +137 / -0

Yes my point exactly. This is bullshit.

See my other comment on aspirin.

JustHereForTheSalmon 27 points ago +27 / -0

HIV-1 is on that list...are they admitting something about fetal cell lines were used in it's development?

powershellder 2 points ago +2 / -0

African monkey cells were…

TheSuperStableGenius 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that's only fitting seeing as it came from the brotha fucking the monkey

DonJr2032 [S] 54 points ago +57 / -3

Yes, but they are saying that they started using fetal cells for testing in the recent past

PoohClimbsTrees 87 points ago +88 / -1

Ya, because aspirin is getting rigorously tested still...

DangerousAmerican76 -1 points ago +35 / -36

y’all believe that aspirin is totally the same as it was when first used from a willow?

Cuz it ain’t

You can not patent willow tree bark, you can’t make money from something that isn’t patented. This is all medicine, none of it is all natural, it’s all petroleum chemicals.

Wake up

HuggableBear 80 points ago +81 / -1

Aspirin isn't willow bark and it never has been.

Acetylsalicylic acid is the active ingredient in willow bark tea and was isolated and recreated in a lab 150 years ago. It's not a complex reaction and it doesn't require a massive manufacturing outfit to produce it. It's literally two chemicals mixed together with the precipitate filtered and added to a calcium or magnesium base and compressed into pills.

That basic formulation hasn't changed since its discovery (it couldn't, since chemistry isn't a thing that changes over time) and it never will since it's cheap as shit to produce.

This hospital is full of shit. They are trying to equate research that was done studying the effects of a drug and possible new uses for it with the actual creation or manufacture of a drug.

If someone feeds a poisoned steak to a dog to see how long it takes to die, that doesn't mean that I am condoning poisoning dogs every time I eat a steak.

IAmNotAnAutist 27 points ago +28 / -1

This guy pharms.

Error404 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yuuuge pharm brain

deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
MR_ROBOT1776 34 points ago +34 / -0

We literally made aspirin in one of my Chemistry labs during college. I can attest first hand there were no fetal cells used.

Error404 5 points ago +5 / -0

“tHaT yOu KnOw Of”

Pickinpox 3 points ago +3 / -0

But the bark could've produced another tree if planted.


Colonel_Chestbridge 21 points ago +21 / -0

Acetylsalicylic acid is probably one of the easiest organic syntheses you can do. It’s usually the first reaction you do in a basic organic chemistry class.

Shinydenim -11 points ago +17 / -28

When you say “wake up” do you mean “wake”? How does one wake with respect to a relational direction?

Do you mean, wake, and wake, and wake some more, until you have woke completely?

Can you “wake over”, “wake left”, “wake around?”, “wake down”, or is “wake up” the only acceptable form of an ungrammatical phrase?

And when you say “wake up” do you realize you are drawing attention to a very narrowed realization?

Can’t I “wake up” while being completely unaware of other realities where attention is not given?

It’s why I can’t stand to see ppl use this phrase. It’s like, thanks for adding “up” to the verb, but it doesn’t make what is being said any more direct or obvious.

Just hypocritical hyperbole that is unclear and can easily be used to argue the opposite.

“Wake up!” —“No, YOU wake up!”—

It accomplishes nothing.

lostmyoldpassword 21 points ago +22 / -1

"Wake up" as in, stop being asleep. I hate it as much as you do, but let's not bring fucking compass points into this lol.

tom_machine 8 points ago +8 / -0

Don’t stay awake for too long. Lack of sleep can cause poor judgement and before you know it you’ll be voting democrat.

ShampocalypseWOW 13 points ago +13 / -0

"Up" is shorthand for "updog".

deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
ShampocalypseWOW 8 points ago +8 / -0

That's tragic. Mine died of nunyitis.

Thrasymachus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who's Steve Jobs?

Tardigrade 8 points ago +9 / -1

Your English is pretty good for someone totally unaccustomed to its idioms. Keep at it.

Shinydenim -6 points ago +3 / -9

I get all up in that English language.

HuggableBear 7 points ago +7 / -0

You're right it's hyperbolic, but that semantic argument is ridiculous and you know it.

"Wake up" is used about a thousand times more frequently than just "wake" or "awaken" or whatever you want to say. And yes, it does make sense because the assumption is that you are lying down when you sleep and will get UP when you wake.

Shinydenim -10 points ago +1 / -11

My point is based in syntax, not semantics.

What you are describing is compound action, for which there are words to express doing one thing following another.

I can’t tell you how many times I don’t rise immediately when I wake. I mean, JFC, I’m pretty sure hitting the snooze button is itself the human condition.

The only reason why you don’t say wake is bc you don’t say wake. You feel a natural tendency to avoid saying just the word wake to imply the same thing, mostly because of habit and that you subconsciously think the word by itself is so unnatural for no reason other than that you don’t ever use it that way.

The phrase itself doesn’t make sense. Sense is made at the expense of changing the meaning of the words

HuggableBear 3 points ago +3 / -0

Okay, in case all the downvotes don't make the point clear and since you can't seem to understand that humans frequently communicate in metaphor and use imagery to communicate their message more effectively than pure words, I'm going to offer you two linguistic examples of words and phrases that are in common usage as colloquialisms that are very well understood despite not being literally correct:

Shut the fuck up, you pedantic little shit.

Clandestiny 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alright. You're not wrong :)

ShampocalypseWOW 19 points ago +20 / -1

Still completely irrelevant. The reason it is immoral is if you personally gain from the murder of babies. Experimenting on aborted babies well after a product has been brought to market and proven effective does nothing to change the benefit you get from the drug. It just means the people doing the experiments are going to Hell. If they derive any new product from those experiments, that would constitute gaining a benefit from their murder. With the mRNA jabs, the only way to test them was with human cells... or for some reason that's the only way they tested them. Those tests led them to be brought to market.

kornesque 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not detecting invalidity of your points here and am confused at the downvote.

Oh that's right...cucks. Cucks everywhere.

Uh-hickabuh 3 points ago +3 / -0

One downvote 4 hrs after you commented this. Kind of a drama queen aren't you?

kornesque 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guess that's subjective. Just curious what the disagreement is here, this is newer territory and should be discussed.

arkylady 9 points ago +10 / -1

I'm glad they have exposed this, I never had any idea all these medications used fetal cells in some way.

Toobin247 6 points ago +6 / -0

Apparently there’s a connection with fetal cell lines and foods like coke and Pepsi. I don’t know how strong the connection is or if it’s just being overplayed.

HuggableBear 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's a gigantic straw man argument.

Fetal cell lines are frequently used in research. In the case of foods, they use it to test reactions to the product. The actual discovery and manufacture of the product has nothing to do with fetal cells, but at some point they tested the product in vitro on some fetal cells so now it's "They make Coke with fetal cells!"

Electricutie 5 points ago +5 / -0

Honestly starting to sound like they're just trying to get a human madcow going by using fetuses in everything.

DangerousAmerican76 4 points ago +5 / -1


Toobin247 29 points ago +30 / -1

I had my religious exemption approved and I did it without arguing the fetal cell line angle because I knew they wouldn’t accept it. You have to argue the moral conscious and not desecrating your body with something that compromises Gods engineering. This is the way.

deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
catvideos3 6 points ago +6 / -0

Tell them you do t have you share your personal beliefs with them

Redpillmachine 4 points ago +4 / -0

How about I prayed for guidance on the the vax and was given the answer by god? Fuck this lawyer bullshit where they try to tell you your own religious beliefs. Fuck , an angel with a flaming sword could have came to me. Let them try to argue against that.

erefernow 3 points ago +3 / -0

I guess it's too early to bring up the mark of the fucking beast.

Ballind 27 points ago +27 / -0

They also have Tylenol on the list twice lol, once by brand once by active ingredient

alloffoglesfootlong 20 points ago +20 / -0

Also Motrin/Ibuprofen

Libertas_Vel_Mors 2 points ago +2 / -0

...and HIV-I.

Not really sure I'd trust these fucktards with my health at this point...

hackinthebox 14 points ago +18 / -4

GOOD! FUCK THOSE DRUGS TOO. Cant have a headache or stomach ache without needing drugs? Wtaf is wrong with u 😂😅

Femprep 8 points ago +10 / -2

I’m going to go on the assumption that you are male and have not experienced severe menstral cramps.

NotProgCensored 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm male and I've experienced many completely ruined weekends due to menstrual cramps.

Libertas_Vel_Mors 6 points ago +6 / -0


HockeyMom4Trump 1 point ago +1 / -0


Error404 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think I’ve been close... dealt with severe pain ten years before colon cancer diagnosis. Not saying I’ve experienced the same, but it was really painful. Like, you eventually pass out in tears before you fall asleep painful

Haitianbychoice360 0 points ago +5 / -5

There are alternatives out there to deal with severe cramps. You do not need drugs.

NotAPuma 5 points ago +6 / -1

Definitely. Although I do need Claritin for my Allergies. Sneezing so much I can barely function.

BlackPillBot 17 points ago +18 / -1

Have you tried not sneezing?

NotAPuma 10 points ago +10 / -0

BRILLIANT! Why haven't I not thought of this.

BlackPillBot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I got you fren fam. 😁

deleted 1 point ago +3 / -2
Japan4Salt 84 points ago +84 / -0

How in the hell is fetal tissue used in the manufacture of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid).

Its insanely easy to make from an extract of willow tree leaves and bark.

"A precursor to aspirin found in leaves from the willow tree (genus Salix) has been used for its health effects for at least 2,400 years.[9][10] In 1853, chemist Charles Frédéric Gerhardt treated the medicine sodium salicylate with acetyl chloride to produce acetylsalicylic acid for the first time.[11] For the next 50 years, other chemists established the chemical structure and devised more efficient production methods.[11]: 69–75 "

Where do they need fetal tissue to make this?

This is insane.

golinveaux 29 points ago +30 / -1

Fetal cell used in study of not necessarily in product.

ProphetOfKek 18 points ago +18 / -0

Or development of that product. There is no way tums/calcium carbonate required fetal cells to develop or manufacture.

Cantshadowbanthemall 10 points ago +10 / -0

How dare you infer mining equipment doesn't operate on fetal cells

AussieTrumpFan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah. Those machine operators were once fetal cells. They were once clumps of cells that were then allowed time to gestate.

snakeoil 16 points ago +16 / -0


Joshua2001 11 points ago +11 / -0

If I had to guess the use on almost all of these was long after they were developed. Maybe there were testing toxicity limits or if these drugs were affective for different uses. I highly doubt most of these had fetal cells used in their initial development.

Patriot_MAINIAC 9 points ago +9 / -0

I see a list of investigations that need to happen.

Libertas_Vel_Mors 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see a huge string of lawsuits once someone stops taking, say, Lipitor, then has a heart attack.

tombombadil 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tums too. It’s just calcium carbonate pressed into a tablet with some flavoring. There is no way that has ever been tested on fetal tissue. It would be a huge waste of money to do so.

TaxDollarsHardAtWork 4 points ago +4 / -0

They don't. They are full of shit and trying to bully people into compliance using deceit. They assume most people are stupid and will believe their bullshit and go along with their demands without question.

Miha 74 points ago +74 / -0

This is BS. The Christian position is that you take it if it has fetal cells + there is no other alternative + its a case where it is a life-ending situation otherwise. Doesn't apply for a “virus” with 99.9999% survivability. Also half of these have active ingredients that were around way before fetal cell lines.

DonJr2032 [S] 69 points ago +70 / -1

Yes, why is your employer taking on the role of High Priest at your church??

People must fight this legally

Miha 23 points ago +25 / -2

Alternatively, we will contact Alex Jones and get his people to synthesize natural alternatives to all of these. This could be another fu to pharma if all Christians stop using their products.

worldowedexplanation 0 points ago +7 / -7

Are you that clueless that you don't know what herbal medicine is?

Why do you need Alex Jones to "synthesize natural alternatives" for you?

Alternatives already exist. Buy a book about herbs.

Miha 12 points ago +13 / -1

Chill bro it was a joke.

Clandestiny 15 points ago +15 / -0

Just sign it while chewing baby aspirin right in front of them. Fuck them, what are they going to do about it?

I'm not ever taking it, signing anything about it, or faking up any reasons or documentation to skirt "the rules". I'm straight up refusing the nonsense. They'll have to tie me down and force it on me.

My career isn't on the line though, so I get that people doing what they need to do to support their family.

deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
InarosPrime 29 points ago +29 / -0

This is why you don't reveal your religion or your religious beliefs when requesting a religious exemption. Give them as little information as possible. If they make you fill out a form, only fill out what is required by law.

"I am requesting a religious exemption to the COVID vaccine requirement because it conflicts with my sincerely-held religious beliefs." That is all you should be telling your company.

Toobin247 7 points ago +7 / -0

If you work in healthcare like me, they will pull you into a meeting with a committee that includes doctors, pharmacists, and clergy and have you explain your exact beliefs. It’s a tight rope walk. Too little information and you’ll have to go speak in front of them and get fucked being interrogated. Too much information and they’ll fuck you on that too by saying it’s irrelevant.

For example in my letter I made sure to refer to the Covid vaccine as just that. I did not refer to mRNA or anything about how vaccines actually work because they could say “take the JnJ, it’s not mRNA” even though the JnJ seems to achieve almost the same goal as the Pfizer vax but in a different way.

HuggableBear 18 points ago +18 / -0

they will pull you into a meeting with a committee that includes doctors, pharmacists, and clergy and have you explain your exact beliefs

"I'm sorry, my religion prevents me from attending that sort of meeting without both my lawyer and my priest present and requires that the room undergo a six-month consecration period to purify the auras of conflict and disdain."

Toobin247 7 points ago +7 / -0


Error404 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not to mention it’s none of any of their business. You have the right to not have your religious beliefs paraded around like that. I would allow two people most to that sort of thing. My immediate supervisor, and the person at the top making to determination.

InarosPrime 14 points ago +14 / -0

That kind of meeting is clearly a setup to get you to make a mistake. It may be considered religious discrimination to force someone with religious beliefs to do something not required by non-religious employees. It falls under harassment, religious coercion, and hostile work environment.


Record the meeting if your state laws allow. Ask them why you have been brought to the meeting. After that, tell them you are not going to elaborate on your religious beliefs. The law does not require you to do so as a condition for reasonable accommodation. Walk out.

Toobin247 6 points ago +6 / -0

There was some pushback and they laid off of many things they tried to do. At first they required a letter from clergy but dropped that requirement. I’m pretty sure it was due to legal pushback. The meeting is so you can “elaborate “ and yes it’s to get you talking so they can find a way to deny you. If you provide explanations in the letter you avoid the meeting. Several employees that found themselves in that situation did do because they only sent random Bible quotes without interpretation of meaning. I’ve been documenting as much as I can too. I keep my mouth shut even though what’s being said makes my blood boil. The information that’s shared when you’re not seen as a threat is gold. I just work away and listen.

SaltHarvest 8 points ago +8 / -0

Exactly. Had a house fire and went round and round with the insurance company. They already had my statement on what had occurred. Since I had gone back and forth with them on the total I was looking for they decided they needed me to attend a deposition to 'finalize things.' Since I wasn't born yesterday I retained a lawyer and he sent them a letter stating that we would participate but they would need to come to his law office for the deposition. They acted butthurt, wondering why I had procured a lawyer, and then dropped it. Prior to their dropping it I met with my lawyer and to practice how a deposition would go. No coaching at first. He wanted to see what he was working with I guess and if he asked a 'yes' or 'no' question that was all he got. He would then sit there and stare at me after one of those questions trying to get me to say something else but I wouldn't. After about 15 minutes of this he said what he was doing but said it was obvious I already knew that and laughed. Getting back to the document above I like their passive-aggressive way of putting sincerely held belief in quotes.

Weneedanewplague 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's dancing about the line of religious persecution. You should def not go to a meeting like that w/o your lawyer.

Toobin247 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fortunately I do not have to worry. At least for now. And I can legally record in my state.

Jrubin 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wow, I'm sorry, that is nuts. My exemption application just asked for names of people who have seen me practicing my beliefs!

TheSniffingMenace 5 points ago +5 / -0

Claim to be muslim........lets see how much interrogate

onomatopoeia 4 points ago +5 / -1

And why does it have to be a "sincerely-held" belief? Nothing is sincere in our society, why are religious people the only ones held to a standard of sincerity? I guess clown world.

InarosPrime 3 points ago +3 / -0

That is the legal language used for determining when an employer must reasonably accommodate.

ProphetOfKek 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn’t have to be. You just have to say it is.

deleted 66 points ago +66 / -0
horus_falke 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes, they are defining and constraining a religious claim as being specifically related to using fetus tissue. As if there's no other possible religious conflict with this vaccine. The people doing this stuff are evil and deserve the worst.

TheSarcasticSlav 7 points ago +7 / -0

The guy who came up with this felt really fucking clever. So much so he didn’t realize how fucking stupid he sounds.

deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
deleted 50 points ago +50 / -0
CTGunner82 49 points ago +49 / -0

My religious exemption is that coercing someone to take any medication, especially experimental medications, is pure evil.

racistTodler 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's mine too. My religious objection has nothing to do with using aborted fetal cells for research.

Jrubin 41 points ago +41 / -0

My daughters application for exemption also had a termination button she had to check. It said if my exemption is not approved I voluntarily terminate my employment with the hospital. Could not submit the exemption without checking that box.

Pederella 23 points ago +23 / -0

What a slimy weasel way to set it up. Bet that was also the only way to file for an exemption.

Jrubin 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yeah it still gets me riled up thinking about it. She's looking for other work, even if she gets the exemption, healthcare is out of control right now.

HuggableBear 22 points ago +22 / -0

Pretty sure that's actually illegal, because that still forces the employee to leave based on their religious beliefs.

If you ever tell an employee that they must resign, that's no longer voluntary. Period.

Jrubin 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yeah I'm sure its not legal, but who is going to stop them? The hospital is a huge corporation with deep pockets. My daughter and I have very shallow pockets, but we will see how it turns out. The whole thing makes me angry.

ZhaoBaiDeng 2 points ago +2 / -0

You! Just say I'm not resigning.

Jrubin 2 points ago +2 / -0

She will say that if/when the time comes. But did you see where I said her application would not be accepted without saying she would be leaving voluntarily if the exemption is not granted?

ZhaoBaiDeng 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea, I changed my mind. I'm not leaving voluntarily anymore. I thought it at the time but....

InarosPrime 7 points ago +7 / -0

What if she doesn't comply? What are they going to do, fire her?

Jrubin 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, they aren't firing her, she has "voluntarily" quit. Their way of getting around paying unemployment benefits, and I'm sure it will work.

InarosPrime 9 points ago +9 / -0

All she has to do is write a letter stating she has decided to not voluntarily quit.

Jrubin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe, we'll see.

680-EVIL 2 points ago +2 / -0

Then make them sign a form where they have to confirm not taking the vaccine doesn't mean you voluntarily quit.

Jrubin 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know it seems simple, but it is not. Like most of us on the right, we just want to be left alone to live our best life. My daughter and I aren't looking to fight a huge hospital corporation. I'm sure we don't stand a chance. Neither of us can afford to lose our jobs, but we are not getting the jab. So we will make changes as we go through this.

WowStrongWinning 0 points ago +1 / -1

Quit making excuses.

AngryMuffin 4 points ago +4 / -0

She should have mailed in the request.

Jrubin 2 points ago +3 / -1

Was required to be completed on line. The hospital has covered all their bases.

HuggableBear 7 points ago +7 / -0

No they haven't. That would not hold up for ten seconds in court. They just don't think anyone has the balls or the money to fight it.

silentnoobxd 2 points ago +2 / -0

You assume the court will be fair

HuggableBear 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, I'm assuming it will never go to court because no employee of theirs has the money to fight it.

I'm just pointing out to people that just because a legal department comes up with something doesn't mean it's actually legal.

silentnoobxd 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's very true. When activists take over the legal department, things go off the rails fast and nobody is willing to question it.

Jrubin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well they are right about not having the money to fight it. We all know laws don't really matter much anymore.

Trumpnado_warning 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's ridiculous. Keep us posted on what happens.

Jrubin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Will do.

deleted 30 points ago +33 / -3
Dunkin4COVAIDS 28 points ago +28 / -0

You don't need to be Christian to have a religious exemption. A "personal belief" is not all inclusive and could simply be that one does not believe in taking an experimental drug that is harming people. You are not required to disclose or justify your beliefs to anyone. I'd crumple this up and throw it in their face. No one, anywhere in the USA needs approval from anyone for their beliefs. All this paper does is shoves you into the box that they want you to fit in. Fuck these people.

680-EVIL 1 point ago +1 / -0


RoosterRaiser 22 points ago +22 / -0

This is bullshit. Just refuse. Period. It is none of anyone's business why. They are going to deny it anyway. Why play this stupid game? Either you refuse or you are too weak to stand on principal.

No wonder we are in this disaster.

elaearae 18 points ago +18 / -0

This right here. I have a couple family members that are absolutely furious at me for refusing the jab. When they asked me why the first time, I responded with VAERS data. When they asked me the second time, I responded with “my body my choice,” and they are still fuming. The last thing I said to them was “it doesn’t fucking matter what my reasons are, I don’t have to justify my decisions to anyone,” and they’re still mad. Stop playing the game. Just say no and don’t bother trying to explain why, no reasons will ever be good enough for these zombies.

onomatopoeia 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yikes! Your own family wants you in the crab bucket real bad. Stay strong.

Jack_NC 4 points ago +4 / -0

cut them out of your life. They can never be trusted.

BrownRugs 18 points ago +18 / -0

I’d rather go to a fucking unlicensed veterinarian than Conway

onomatopoeia 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd trust a taxidermist over these demons.

OrthamVega 17 points ago +17 / -0

no idea where people thought religion was going to save you from dictators. They don't abide by laws. I just say no. no need for any exemption.

Captain_REEcard 14 points ago +14 / -0

You can contact them here: https://www.conwayregional.org/about/contact-us

Their Twitter, where the top tweet says they're hiring RNs right now: https://twitter.com/ConwayRegional

RoscoePColtraine 12 points ago +12 / -0


I hear you're looking to hire travel nurses? I have family in the area and had been considering relocating there soon. However I note the issues you've been giving your staff regarding their religious exemption to the covid vaccine, so my fellow travel nurses and I have decided to never do business with your facility. If you can treat your own staff in such a shameful manner, then we have no expectation of fairness from you as a contract worker. Your facility is now well known amongst the travel nurses as one to avoid. Learn how to treat your staff better.

How'd I do?

Joshua2001 14 points ago +14 / -0

This reeks of someone who thinks they are being cleaver(patting themselves on the back for this one) but are also probably breaking the law. There are plenty of reasons people might be rejecting the vaccine for religious purposes and they don't have any business questioning why.

Pickinpox 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is what they are making every state worker in WA do. It is a way to single out anyone that has reservations and or religious beliefs about the jab. Then you will be relieved of your duty, no matter how much time you have in.

deplorablepepe4 14 points ago +15 / -1

Jokes on them, i dont take any medicine.

DonJr2032 [S] 12 points ago +12 / -0
anon09 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't take those. :D

all of this stuff poisons your mind. legit.

cyberrigger 8 points ago +8 / -0


Can I chew on some willow tree bark?

plaaaa 5 points ago +5 / -0

I drink a bit more water & I'm fine.

Miha 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pollen block over Claritin any day

NotAPuma 2 points ago +2 / -0

You got a better alternative than Claritin? I can barely function when I'm not on something most days during Allergy Season.

iSignedUpForThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

Surely wearing a mask has solved your allergies right?!?!?!?!

NotAPuma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lmao. Never did wear a Mask. Pollens a bitch though.

HuggableBear 3 points ago +3 / -0

It is my sincerely held religious belief that 98%+ of all headaches are due to unnoticed dehydration.

plaaaa 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same. Since someone suggested this to me, decades ago, I haven't had any.

Dos_Scoops 12 points ago +19 / -7

I don't see THC anywhere so where do I sign?

BidensButtWiper 3 points ago +13 / -10

sigh fucking dopers

Dos_Scoops 8 points ago +13 / -5

You'll get over it.

LiberalTearsMiner 7 points ago +8 / -1

I smoke medical cannabis, it’s natural and won’t make your balls swell up hahahaha

AussieTrumpFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just imagine the reeing if Nicki Minaj had come out against weed, saying it had made her cousin's balls swell up...

MikeOxbig007 1 point ago +3 / -2

You get your meds from big pharma doper…

BidensButtWiper 2 points ago +3 / -1


Flapjackflipper 11 points ago +11 / -0

What bullshit. Do they also require that you can never have an enlightening experience or change religions? Seems like more kabuki theater and impossible to enforce.

SentryS 3 points ago +3 / -0

You’re free to practice any religion in this country. And no one can tell you who or what religion you’re allowed to practice nor can they dictate your religious beliefs and systems.

If they believe that people can be religiously exempted then the reasons for the belief are irrelevant. After all, these people don’t even believe in religion anyways.

If they need an example of those “sincerely held beliefs” that can be disregarded or selectively enforced see Islam and the woman face coverings

remindmelater 10 points ago +11 / -1

Because........Nobody knows more about what a Christian believes than an non Christian.....

LiberalTearsMiner 8 points ago +8 / -0

I used to live in Conway, that place is turning into a shit hole. There’s several colleges there with woke students, more and more people moving there and crime is rising. 2020 Conway voted majority trump but you can’t really tell when traveling around town.

golinveaux 8 points ago +8 / -0

HIV-1... Me thinks this is a troll. Although HIV is 100% engineered.

AngryMuffin 7 points ago +7 / -0

Tums is calcium carbonate and sucrose. It's been around since 1930. The only way stem cell research was involved is if some a researcher was whoring for a satanic grant.

So they can fuck right off.

Powhattan 7 points ago +9 / -2

Add an addendum - don't fuck men's buttholes. Don't cut dick off and dress up like a women. Don't vote for Biden.....

kommisar6 7 points ago +8 / -1

I would sign that...

MAGADUDE 7 points ago +7 / -0

So employers can dictate your religion to you? Whatever happend to this being a personal matter between you and God?

I also noticed a lot of those meds have been around long before fetal tissue research.

jonrockets 7 points ago +7 / -0

I grew up in Conway. It's a bonafide college town now. Conway Regional is nationally known to be one of the worst hospitals in the country. No surprise that they would do this.

Karma 6 points ago +6 / -0

If I was asked to sign this I would just say no. No to a forced injection. No to signing silly papers. My religion is against communist tactics.

nachosamplerREBORN 5 points ago +6 / -1

Most of this can be bought OTC and I’ll pass on HIV-1.

gromenawer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Natzis made some sick experiments on people that generated knowledge which is still use today by all health systems. Specially in the field of oncology and surgery.

Maybe they want to put another box " [ ] Are you a natzi sympathizer? " and tell them what they will miss too.

DonJr2032 [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes, like how cold can your body be before you die? When they put Jews in controlled temperature ice water to see how low their body temperature can go and for how long, before they die.
They used this research to advise the military for pilots that crash into water, and to help determine the best method to keep the body warm when submerged in these waters.

Jl123 5 points ago +5 / -0

My brother's wife got her exemption last week. When she handed her form in they basically told her they were going to do whatever they had to do to keep her around.

Cyberpunkd 5 points ago +5 / -0

I would submit the initial letter saying it's against my beliefs. After that, I would respond to this letter by saying, please talk to my attorney. This is harassment based on one's religious beliefs.

Dutch_Christian 5 points ago +5 / -0

They laugh at you with that piece of paper. They think they have you by your religious Jesus fanboy balls. Why in heaven's name would you sign that?!

witchism11 4 points ago +4 / -0

My religious exemption is because I refuse to take the Mark of the Beast. It has nothing to do with the ingredients.

Fat_Moco 4 points ago +4 / -0

Who told these idiots that religious exception was solely based on fetal tissue. Some people just prefer not to have the mark of the beast because the devil is bad, mmmkay.

BoughtByBloomberg2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Don't sign anything. Religious exemption is NOT am agreement between you and your faggot employer. It is a right to free exercise you are enforcing upon your employer.

Based45 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck that, make them provide the sauce for every detail they claim. Don’t just take their word for it, even if they are right, make them dig up all the data.

SakaSouffle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oh course I won't take Tylenol or Benadryl. I'll take Acetaminophen and Diphenhydramine.

destroyer713 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also all of these have years of usage to show their long-term effects. More importantly if you want to use a religious exemption go the route that the spike protein collects in the ovaries, possibly causing infertility and miscarriage, potentially permanently removing the ability to have children, the ultimate symbol of family and God's love.

Libertas_Vel_Mors 4 points ago +4 / -0

Massive lawsuit waiting to happen. Whoever wrote that document up needs to be fired

BotFlyPenis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hanged, see I fixed it.

ProphetOfKek 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lmao, tums? There is no way calcium carbonate required fetal cells to test.

deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
WowStrongWinning 3 points ago +3 / -0

A lawyer hasn’t sued them yet? This is a clear violation of a persons religious rights. Fetal cells isn’t the only argument for a religious exemption.

Are we at the point where one has to declare their own religious and get it a 501c tax number as verification?

SwedishChainsaw2 3 points ago +3 / -0

My religous exemption has nothing to do with fetal cells. I'm not taking a spike protein vaccine because my religion forbids suicide.

angular-velocity 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even if true (it's not) your religious belief system is your own. You can pick and choose as you like. No one gets to tell you how you must practice your own religion. What the fuck don't these commie faggots understand about freedom of religion?

arkylady 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wait, so are they claiming all these medicines use fetal cells? What the actual fuck.

DonJr2032 [S] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, in some way, including testing

Sodium_miner 3 points ago +3 / -0

And when did they start putting fetal tissue into aspirin? Guess I missed it.

Riggs99 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think a few places (like Barnes Law) have links to the science data showing jabs and fetal cells. (or at least 2 of them do)

Have those ready, then say "Show me the science that all these other drugs have dead babies in them too"

ak83 3 points ago +3 / -0

oh no, more big pharma poison to pedal.

sanitaryshaver 3 points ago +3 / -0

When does your employer get to tell you how to practice your religion?

When authoritarian leftoids are not smacked down.

Do_the_Math 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why the hell would anyone want to take any of the garbage on that list? If I have a fever, I am taking a cool bath or shower to keep temp in check. If I have congestion, I am dosing up on C and NAC (wipes out nasal congestion in minutes). Castor Oil or magnesium citrate is great for constipation, and a little baking soda works fine for occasional acid indigestion. Allopathic medicine will kill you because treating the symptom instead of the cause is more profitable.

That said, wasn't aspirin developed around 1850's and marketed by Bayer in 1899 while fetal cell line use started in the 1930's? Wasn't Ex-Lax created in 1906? Tums was developed in 1928, and Pepto Bismol started being sold in 1900.