3443
Comments (164)
sorted by:
97
justice_will_prevail 97 points ago +97 / -0

Vet em then vet em again... then get him name recognition early and let's get turtle gone.

146
Captain_MAGA 146 points ago +150 / -4

And then ask Kushner his opinion on them, and do the opposite of what he says.

33
Alphahorizon 33 points ago +33 / -0

And then see through all of their social media history to include areas they may have deleted and ask why?

28
Saint_Floyd 28 points ago +36 / -8

This has been up an hour and nobody has called you a stormfag or anti-semite yet. Pleasant surprise.

44
Barbs 44 points ago +48 / -4

Because he called him out by name.

He’s addressing Jared on an individual level, not suggesting he’s part of some cabal that’s trying to destroy our way of life.

Believe it or not, most of us are smart enough to see the line between criticism and anti-semitism, it’s the anti-semites who have no idea where that line is, because in their world everything is on one side of it.

25
djentropyhardcore 25 points ago +28 / -3

Exactly. Kushner isn't a pansy because he's Jewish. He's a pansy cause he's a shitty person, regardless of how he worships.

6
magaroll 6 points ago +8 / -2

Odd how all Jewish folk in postions of politics happen to be shitty people.....

2
zerocooltx 2 points ago +9 / -7

you haven't done enough research. go back to 4chan until you've learned.

9
JerryNadlerBeltFund 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kushner really pushed for Pence to be running mate in 2016. . . of course, after Pence had already endorsed someone else (Cruz, I believe).

1
djentropyhardcore 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok boomer

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
6
SargentSlate 6 points ago +10 / -4

There's no such thing as "anti-semitism" you fucking clown. The tribe has been EXPELLED from 109 nations in the past for good reason.

3
Wupta 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just asking cause I don’t know, did something happen with Kushner?

7
Worldtraveler0405 7 points ago +7 / -0

Got exposed as a Liberal Democrat.

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't it somethng like his first day in office?

4
TownHallBall 4 points ago +4 / -0

He's a total faggot.

6
Captain_MAGA 6 points ago +7 / -1

Must be a work holiday in Guangzhou.

7
GenesisFiveTwo 7 points ago +8 / -1

Lol

3
McCainRapedObama 3 points ago +4 / -1

Best comment and advice... nice one pede

3
CaptainButthurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wow you could create a fairly useful methodology for good decisions based on this logic. WWJKND. The What Would Jared Kushner Not Do stratagem.

18
Traiya 18 points ago +19 / -1

Bit of a weakness for for Trump, picking trustworthy people.

We can't just accept his vetting without checking ourselves.

6
Inquisitor_Corvus 6 points ago +6 / -0

So very much, THIS!!!

-1
_-Th0r-_ -1 points ago +2 / -3

Yes and no.

During his first term, he was dealing with a Washington that hated him and didn’t expect him to win. Want to get someone confirmed by the Senate to a cabinet post? Guess whose permission you need.

“Judicial appointment legacy” … belongs to Federalist society and Mitch.

Now that he is out of office, he can apply pressure without needing Mitch’s cooperation. No immediate need to force concessions.

6
TheMadManDidItAgain 6 points ago +6 / -0

They must be openly Trump supporters as well... they have to be willing to take the criticism for supporting the best President of our lifetime.

1
TownHallBall 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ever

3
TheMadManDidItAgain 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry... I don't think ANYBODY can top George Washington. It's not that he was the first... but because he was the first, he had a huge ability to become "King" and ability to set so many precedence that would have failed with most other people of the time. GW would not have hesitated to publicly hang most of the treasonous assholes in government right now... He would have probably personally shot Milley.

I have recently come to terms that I think Trump was a better President that Lincoln. Trump would have been Lincoln. My biggest issue with Lincoln is that he suspended Habeas Corpus. I haven't thought that one fully through and I don't have enough legal knowledge to understand why this was a good thing (or a bad thing). I just know that it seems like a bad idea... but I really don't know.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
WeAreGonnaWin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Trump has to simplify his vetting process:

Ask them to publicly announce on tv "MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN! THIS TRAIN HAS NO BREAKS!" while hugging the American flag.

If they can do this without trembling their lips, then Trump can announce:

"FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, GET THIS PATRIOT A COAT!"

49
FollowTheCrumbs 49 points ago +49 / -0

All of the senators suck. Not one does a damn thing. They just blow hot air constantly.

25
Imransgarage 25 points ago +25 / -0

Exactly. Every last one needs to be replaced.

If he names Rubio or something I will shit a brick.

1
FromSethWithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I demand a hearing with no useful outcome now!"

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Breaking: "Trump names Rubio!"

1
bubadmt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't worry bout it liddle marco

14
Bot-not1 14 points ago +14 / -0

John Kennedy from Louisiana is pretty damned good...

3
Sulla4Consul 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m a huge fan of his rhetorical gifts and old southern detective style cunning. Still, I fear he’s a little too much show and not enough go. He does 3 Fox hits a day with titles like “Biden is dumber than a box of rocks” and then nothing gets done about it. I know partly that’s due to the nature of the senate but still, need to see some action from him

9
Barbs 9 points ago +10 / -1

Because individually that’s all they can do, write sternly worded letters. Power in our government is a numbers game, so instead of calling out the guy writing the letters, we should be calling out all the ones who aren’t.

My vote would be for Rand. He tends to be the least-sucky out of all of them.

4
Inquisitor_Corvus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Senators are powerful. Senators can’t do shit. Fucking pick one.

6
WillHammer 6 points ago +6 / -0

They have to be replaced wholesale by good citizen, non-politicians. It needs to happen world wide. We need to take our countries back from our would-be born rulers.

1
Stuka_Ju87 1 point ago +2 / -1

Rand Paul has been doing amazing work for years.

41
Dornan4 41 points ago +41 / -0

Or we just audit his last "election"...no way Mitch won when he was polling at 18%.

15
Barbs 15 points ago +15 / -0

His race was one of the first to be called on election night too. That kinda struck me as suspicious when it happened.

4
Itchlord 4 points ago +5 / -1

A Republican winning in Kentucky? Never.

2
_-Th0r-_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bru it’s KY…

3
Dornan4 3 points ago +3 / -0

That doesn't matter...

1
_-Th0r-_ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong.

In a general election for US Senate, only the Republican will win.

“But they have a Dem Governor.” Yes, elected in an off-year in a state who has mainly been run by Dems since the civil war. They lust for that power. Bevin wasn’t good, he picked fights with the wrong people, and the Dem state media helped tank him.

But no, a federal election year no prayer. Only 1 Dem congressman.

Want to primary Mitch McConnell? He has tens of millions on hand the day you announce to turn around a fast attack ad that brands you immediately. “Bailout Bevin” was what he did when Bevin tried to primary Mitch. As bad as Mitch was, ppl then focused on Bevin’s negatives.

No serious candidate can raise money to run against him.

And given how bad he looks, he won’t live to run again.

1
Dornan4 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hear what you are saying and if this was 2016 I'd be agreeing with you. As a result of 2020 here is where I am at: every swamp creature has been installed using voting software, Lindsay Graham, Mitch McConnell, Liz Cheney etc. In 2020 with an 18% approval rating Mitch received more votes than he had ever before in his entire career...over a million. You wonder why these fuckers keep getting elected, it's not because they had a shitty candidate running against them it's because they had the voting software rigged for them.

0
_-Th0r-_ 0 points ago +1 / -1

… and Trump was on the ballot, who endorsed Mitch. Did you expect KY voters (predominantly conservatives) to vote for Trump and then vote for Amy McGrath? Poster woman for doing a poor job hiding her liberal extremist positions.

No way.

But it’s #YourTruth that matters.

1
Dornan4 1 point ago +1 / -0

And this is why audits will never take place in all 50 states...because of attitudes like this.

27
Kekintosh2020 27 points ago +30 / -3

Hawley or Paul

10
RussianBot6969 10 points ago +15 / -5

Both excellent choices. I never thought I would say this six years ago, but I could get behind Ted Cruz, as well.

1
_-Th0r-_ 1 point ago +2 / -1

I don’t think Rand would even have any interest. He just likes to create sound bytes, not wield power.

-1
DCdeplorable -1 points ago +5 / -6

Rand is the man. Hawley is too new to lead but if he keeps the maga energy maybe he can replace Paul in 10 or 20 years

5
DocOneToo 5 points ago +9 / -4

Rand is a spineless cuck who only ever opens his mouth when he knows he won't have to back it up

3
Thep1mp 3 points ago +5 / -2

No shit. He’s like our version of Bernie.

19
Ex-libtard 19 points ago +19 / -0

Do it. The guy spends zero time on liberty policy

19
remindmelater 19 points ago +19 / -0

Isn't he married to a chinese spy?

16
ChilledCovfefe 16 points ago +17 / -1

Love Trump but he has a habit of picking the worst of the worst.

4
Olds777 4 points ago +6 / -2

That's most of the senate unfortunately.

15
OrangeElvis 15 points ago +15 / -0

Heard that on OAN this morning. Long overdue, but my guess is Trump has been working on this for some time.

11
Grilledpepe 11 points ago +13 / -2

Stop saying former president and replace with rightful president

10
SanAntonio1958 10 points ago +10 / -0

About time!!!

10
FuckReddit4545 10 points ago +10 / -0

Should have happened a long time ago. Fuck that backstabbing Bitch McConnell

9
Scuffers 9 points ago +9 / -0

What can we (collectively?) do to help?

11
d_bokk 11 points ago +11 / -0

Email your Senators and tell them to replace McConnell as the Senate Minority Leader.

4
residue69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Call your Senators' and Representative's offices and befriend the people who work in their local and DC offices. Go to their "town hall" meetings and call and complain if they don't have any.

Hopefully you'll be pleasantly surprised by how many of the people in their offices agree with you.

9
y_do_i_need_to_hide 9 points ago +10 / -1

Trump is not the former president

9
stonepony 9 points ago +12 / -3

Allen West or Larry Elder.

3
JackLemon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wrong. Only a sitting senator can replace the leader.

0
stonepony 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lame.

6
nachosamplerREBORN 6 points ago +6 / -0

The only qualified person is John Miller.

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol. Miller isn't even a senator.

6
Garbage_Day 6 points ago +6 / -0

Won't happen. McConnell is a dominion cuck.

5
RussianBot6969 5 points ago +5 / -0

CCP owned

4
barwhack 4 points ago +4 / -0

CCP cock-boxed...

When marry Chi, marry Xi.

6
escariot 6 points ago +6 / -0

Where the fuck is the turtle even hiding at the moment, haven't heard shit from him in weeks.

6
OwlHoller 6 points ago +6 / -0

Rand Paul for Senate Majority leader in 2022.

Also, throw closet faggot Kevin McCarthy out also.

5
barwhack 5 points ago +6 / -1

We're normalizing "former president" now? Is EVERYTHING a psy-op?

Fraud ruins everything.

5
Trumpwon306 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it's anyone other than John Kennedy or one of the ones who voted not to recognize Biden's illegitimate appointment as President to replace Mitch the Bitch as Republican leader in the senate....nothing at all will change.

Also the bitch is unfortunately not up for reelection until 2026.

3
Kashim11 3 points ago +3 / -0

I've recently started watching Kennedy question people and it's absolutely amazing. The man is really smart and not loyal to anyone but the people.

2
concealedaces 2 points ago +2 / -0

He is very smart, literally went to oxford

3
stagolee 3 points ago +3 / -0

Vetting was always Trump's weakness.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the vast majority of cases he had no choice. The traitorous senate controls who is hired. Trump had more of his nominees blocked and / or delayed than all other previous Presidents COMBINED and that happened with a Republican majority. They also blocked Trump from making any recess appointments thus preventing him from seditious scum like Sessions.

No one here could have done better.

3
Loiuzein 3 points ago +3 / -0

-PRESIDENT- Trump. Not former.

3
Scot 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'd feel a lot better about it if not for President Trump's terrible track record in "vetting" people.

2
Barbs 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yay, for the 10,000th time someone is going to ignore the fact that his candidates for positions in his administration had to be approved by the swamp.

He couldn’t even fire Jeff Sessions until Mitch and Lindsey said they were “open to it.” That’s why we got stuck with an AG who sat on his hands for two years, because Mitch and Lindsey said “nope.”

3
Wrexxis780 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fucking finally. But he better triple vet them so we don’t end up with another McStain

3
Observe95 3 points ago +4 / -1

Ted Cruz is the only option.

1
JackLemon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cruz? The scumbag globalist that called the J6 protestors traitors. Not a chance.

1
RussianBot6969 1 point ago +2 / -1

Paul would be a good choice. I like what I've seen from Hawley, but he's still new so I don't know if he's trustworthy yet.

0
JackLemon 0 points ago +1 / -1

Rand Paul is another traitorous piece of Schiff. That little twerp wants amnesty.

2
SteersBeersandQueers 2 points ago +2 / -0

About time

2
Bluridgegirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Death to the turtle!

2
hey_spike 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trump running a shadow presidency out in the open.

2
Grief 2 points ago +2 / -0

We somehow now have control over the RINOs? Sorry, but no way in hell they'll have the votes to get a non-swamp rat into power.

2
tiamat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uh with his track record, I don't trust his hiring

2
SheikFromMozambake 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, duh. You still get an upvote but, if Trump wasn't doing this, I'd be shocked.

2
TrumpIsMyyPresident 2 points ago +2 / -0

But don't we need secure elections first........

2
thelawmat 2 points ago +2 / -0

🖕🐢

2
SteveRogers42 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Legitimate President Trump “. FIFY

2
BatmanForTrump 2 points ago +3 / -1

Trump has learned from his experience the 1st time, he knows a few things, purge RINOs out before running again, and vet, vet and triple vet everyone around you to make sure there are no traitors or subverters

2
Junosu 2 points ago +2 / -0

And it ISN'T Benedict McCarthy.

2
AmericanScholar373 2 points ago +2 / -0

Libtards: WTF I LOVE MITCH MCCONNELL NOW?

2
Buzzhead 2 points ago +2 / -0

Flush that turd down the drain

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Btcox 1 point ago +1 / -0

I will celebrate the day a maga based senator bumps turtle out of the picture

1
UnusualPepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

he is going to choose lindsey graham.. but is it really upto Trump?

1
DoneWithThisShit 1 point ago +1 / -0

This can't come soon enough. Tonight I dine on turtle soup!

1
peltast 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe somebody needs to step in and take the wheel of the choosing process. Just sayin'.

1
FiresideRant 1 point ago +1 / -0

"President Trump is vetting possible candidates to REMOVE SENATE MINORITY LEADER MITCH MCCONNELL from his leadership position..."

I like the wording of that.

First thought that came to mind was Trump having a conversation with Rambo.

1
Thewickersnipper 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pick me boss, I’ll burn it all down!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Worldtraveler0405 1 point ago +1 / -0

u/War_Hamster Who would you like to see as Majority Leader, Paul, Cotton, Hawley or Jordan?

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Paul, Cotton, and Hawley are Senators. Jordan is a Congressman.

Of the Senators, Hawley and Paul are two that I don't hate. Cotton is a sellout on too many issues.

Jordan is solid on most issues, and the Left hates him.

But none are calling for a Special Counsel into 11/3 and I haven't heard End the Fed is quite awhile, so I'm ok if we throw all the bums out and start over.

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

I also wanted you to know that .... for having been not so often on FB ... or checking up with what I like ... but stumbling on this page group I liked years ago ... you can see how far I've come. XD https://www.facebook.com/beingliberal.org/

Bunch of morons on that page. No shit my life was empty.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yikes.

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

I see. Thanks!

You're right. I have seen posts on this forum before, but also on the_donald.win and Reddit, wherein Cotton contradicts himself and MAGA etc.

Jordan could be House Majority Leader instead of McCarthy.

Well, that is true. Do you need a Majority to call a special council? I mean, how was that whole Russia investigation able to start?

It wouldn't be a surprise if bitter figures like Graham simply couldn't and didn't care.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Dems didn't have a majority when Robert Mueller was named Special Counsel. And not a single Republican is calling for one now. I think those two facts speak volumes.

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

Could Grassley have done anything about it?

Maybe a diversion from Trump himself?

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

My complaint is that not a single one is even talking about it.

Useless RINOs.

2
Worldtraveler0405 2 points ago +2 / -0

For sure interesting. Stealthy?

I mean, I remember videos of Trump congratulating and complementing Grassley and vice versa. So, is there something we don't see?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think Grassley is an ally of MAGA or Trump. Sure, he's good on some issues, but he's dead wrong or silent on others.

1
sonofliberty79 1 point ago +1 / -0

Get it done, I will vote for him

1
raptormissle 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hopefully the "vetting" process is different than the one he used for his administration that was filled with back stabbing anti-trumpers.

1
CentralAmericanPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

He should look to remove McCarthy as well.