2030
Comments (113)
sorted by:
79
SigSauer1776 79 points ago +79 / -0

The Constitution barely exists anymore today. We can no longer say what we want or post what we want, which is covered under the first fucking amendment. Can't even carry a gun in The US Capitol. The Justice system is a joke at best and our government has never been so corrupt in the history of our Country.

41
blackswans 41 points ago +42 / -1

The Constitution hasn't existed since Roosevelt threatened to stack the Supreme Court if he didn't get his way....aaaaaaaaand he got his way.

39
onemoretimeagain22 39 points ago +39 / -0

I think the down fall was when the personal income tax started

14
GreyKnight 14 points ago +14 / -0

That was one of the big ones. With the tax act after altering the constitution to add an amendment just to be able to do it, then the federal reserve act they set up lobbying, after welfare, they set up buying votes with tax funds more easily, and the selling out was well on its way...here are the ones I can think of, I know there are a few more...they(primarily democrats) have attacked almost every aspect of our nation over the past 100 years...

Taxation

https://www.thoughtco.com/us-constitution-16th-amendment-4165999

and the federal reserve

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/12/226

FDR

https://beinglibertarian.com/can-we-finally-admit-fdr-was-a-terrible-president/

LBJ welfare and immigration

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jan/22/lyndon-johnson-anniversary-death-awful-man-my-political-hero

https://history.house.gov/Historical-Highlights/1951-2000/Immigration-and-Nationality-Act-of-1965/

and then the Clintons selling out America

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-clintons-throw-americ_b_11316578

https://www.trade.gov/north-american-free-trade-agreement-nafta

https://ustr.gov/trade-agreements/free-trade-agreements/trans-pacific-partnership/tpp-full-text

Obama in pretty much every way, there is much more

https://dcxposed.com/2012/05/23/treason-12-ways-obama-screwed-america/ https://fee.org/articles/obamacare-strikes-out-on-affordability-savings-coverage/

Washington warned us all in his day...

https://www.mountvernon.org/library/digitalhistory/digital-encyclopedia/article/george-washington-s-farewell-address/

3
jacquire14 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spot on post.

4
AndrewLB 4 points ago +4 / -0

The downfall was when they made Senators elected by voters and not state legislatures as they were intended. Right now we'd almost have a supermajority in the senate had it not been changed.

9
SigSauer1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

True. Been dead for a minute...

1
labiator 1 point ago +2 / -1

but muh 2a

37
Alpha_Lemming 37 points ago +37 / -0

More importantly, WHY does the government want this info?

On a totally unrelated note: with guns, registration precedes confiscation.

Start drawing down on extra cash in the bank. I'm doing 300 a day at the ATM. Then convert a bunch of it to silver.

39
TruthDefenseForce 39 points ago +39 / -0

They want to eventually control what you are and are not allowed to buy. Full digital currency only (0 physical) and your vaccine passport will expand to carbon footprint rations etc... Good behavior is rewarded and bad behavior is punished. Also, in the future future there won't be currency. You'll simply be allowed to have access to some things and not allowed access to other things based on your behavior and that's it. They want total control.

14
Sylvester1212 14 points ago +14 / -0

Someone gets it.

7
Willnotcomply 7 points ago +7 / -0

Rook tu chynah

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
bigly4trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

I will literally kill any federal agent who shows up asking me about $600 worth of transactions

2
GentleSlayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not a 600 transaction. Its all transacrions from all accounts that are ever above a 600 balance.

2
xanaxagoras 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, in the future future there won't be currency. You'll simply be allowed to have access to some things and not allowed access to other things based on your behavior and that's it. They want total control.

BUY XMR AND HODL PEDES

1
covok48 1 point ago +3 / -2

They will order you to turn in your gold and silver just like last time. Oh and they already trace staggered deposits & withdrawls like this anyway.

28
QueensOwn 28 points ago +28 / -0

This is yet another expansion of Government intrusion into your personal life and it must be stopped.

8
BillionsAndBillions 8 points ago +9 / -1

I'm pretty sure this policy is already in place. The only change is that the transaction threshold is being dropped from the current amount to only $600. Right now private transactions above a certain amount are all flagged for the DHS. IIRC, there is a higher threshold where the DHS must approve the private bank transaction.

14
QueensOwn 14 points ago +14 / -0

Here are the specific guidelines. Currently it’s 10,000 cash or check gets reported to the IRS. There are other scenarios including SAR reporting.

https://www.solvable.com/tax-help/irs/do-banks-report-check-deposits-to-the-irs/

This is a huge difference reporting $600. The target is clear. The little guy putting in proceeds from a small business.

1
jacquire14 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think they just want the right to investigate their political opponents. Most people won’t be bothered, but charges based on account information will be brought out of the blue for people who disagree with power.

0
covok48 0 points ago +4 / -4

It was 10k. Got dropped to 5k a few years ago.

5
KnottyJane 5 points ago +5 / -0

From what I understood it wasn’t $600 per transaction, it was if you had $600 in your account at any time.

2
GentleSlayer 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its not per transaction. Its all transaction from every account that ever had a 600 balance.

3
KingOfTards 3 points ago +3 / -0

They will flip their shit when we win back the government.

7
Sylvester1212 7 points ago +7 / -0

How will we do that?

5
MEiac 5 points ago +5 / -0

Strongly worded letters. /s

-4
KingOfTards -4 points ago +3 / -7

If you don't know then you don't care. Real Patriots are aligned and working.

13
Sylvester1212 13 points ago +14 / -1

Nothing makes me prouder than keyboard warriors berating others when they ask questions. That's how I know we will win. We rock at memes and offending those on our own side.

-5
KingOfTards -5 points ago +2 / -7

If you do not know then you haven't given any efforts to find who is doing what. You are just another end of days doomer who probably hasn't registered to vote. The information is at your finger tips. If you are cool with letting Ruby work elections while you stay home and REEEEE all is lost...then you are not one of those that fights.

5
Wallypip3 5 points ago +5 / -0

Brother, we have our own low IQ voters too. They matter because they're on our side, some have always been.

Be empathetic, don't let evil steer you the wrong way.

2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good point. I would rather box their head but that would be wrong as well. I need to work on it. Most of the people here are not on our side though. They are pushing for outcomes that only benefit Democrats.

1
covok48 1 point ago +4 / -3

Spare me you super serial secret workings.

Mom said your tendies were done.

0
KingOfTards 0 points ago +3 / -3

No she didn't. We eat steak. Faggot.

-3
covok48 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Oh uh huh.

25
Verrerogo 25 points ago +25 / -0

Then there is the Fourth Amendment, which says:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ..."

Searches, OK? No searches.

Except with warrant, probable cause, oaths, and all that jazz. NOT as a routine.

We have accepted to be seen naked on a screen at airports because planes are intrinsically dangerous things. Bank accounts are NOT intrinsically dangerous things.

20
deleted 20 points ago +20 / -0
9
onemoretimeagain22 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yup.. the communist in control of the former usa couldn't care less about the constitution

17
KingOfTards 17 points ago +17 / -0

Big banks wanting to eliminate community banks and credit Unions.

Do not forget he wants $60 billion to overhaul the IRS. I mean he wants $1 billion to buy shit tech, $59 billion to build a political opposition database.

11
fooko666 11 points ago +11 / -0

I will just close my bank account and return to the old fashion cash guy. no more shopping online or buying netflix and shit. their loss

12
bbxx 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just wait til they roll out the new digital id and currency...

6
Devildtails [S] 6 points ago +7 / -1

Social credit score enters the chat.

2
InterestingIke 2 points ago +2 / -0

that's dependent on people actually using it

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
11
FLatino 11 points ago +11 / -0

Whatever happened to Lois Lerner? Is her prison stint up yet for weaponizing the lRS for Obama?

10
Brandidh 10 points ago +10 / -0

Right.. And it's any transaction in or out for $600 or more...so every month when I pay my rent they will audit me????

16
GravityBounce1976 16 points ago +17 / -1

It's not any "transaction." It's any bank account that has $600 in it at any point.

6
KingOfTards 6 points ago +6 / -0

Could you imagine when it gets hacked and made public? Its gonna be awesome.

5
FilterBubbles 5 points ago +5 / -0

Time to open a buttload of accounts with $599 each.

0
covok48 0 points ago +2 / -2

They trace that too.

16
Gnometard 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's so they can audit you at the end of the year.

"Well Jimbo, your W2 said you made 54k and you had 55k total deposited, we have to audit "

7
shogun5000 7 points ago +7 / -0

LoL, who's gonna stop them? They know we're all bark and no bite. I hate to say that but I choose to live in reality land.

1
FromSethWithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sad that most of us see it as a choice between living and dying

6
pacalis128 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seems they're preparing for a financial collapse.

0
Devildtails [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

My sentiments exactly.

6
TheMadManDidItAgain 6 points ago +6 / -0

It says it right there, amendment 1.5, right next to where it says abortions are legal and should be paid for by tax payers, below where it says anchor babies are citizens. Oh, and right after it says gay people can be married..... a couple lines before it says the government must provide healthcare for everybody.

6
JohnCocktoastin 6 points ago +6 / -0

16th Amendment

The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard to any census or enumeration.

Art. I § 8, Cl.18

To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.

McCullough v. Maryland (1819). "We admit, as all must admit, that the powers of the government are limited, and that its limits are not to be transcended. But we think the sound construction of the Constitution must allow to the national legislature that discretion, with respect to the means by which the powers it confers are to be carried into [execution]."

16
Verrerogo 16 points ago +16 / -0

Uh that's about wages. Earned income.

You can have money accumulated from other sources than wages or income. Gifts and inheritances.

And past income, from past tax years, have already been scrutinized in the year they were earned, and after that, are nobody's business.

That said, there have always been surveillance of large movements of money. But nothing as small as $600. And only when money is moving. Not just sitting there.

Then there is the Fourth Amendment, which says:

"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ..."

Searches, OK? No searches.

Except with warrant, probable cause, oaths, and all that jazz. NOT as a routine.

We have accepted to be seen naked on a screen at airports because planes are intrinsically dangerous things. Bank accounts are NOT intrinsically dangerous things.

5
JohnCocktoastin 5 points ago +5 / -0

And you would not be taxed on them. It is well within their plenary powers to require reporting of financial transactions over certain amounts. It does not necessarily subject you to tax liability. It easily furthers a legitimate government interest in tax compliance. Don't like it? We should not have an income tax. That solves that problem.

4th amendment hasn't applied to hardly anything for some time now. I would encourage you to study up on this because they have eviscerated our rights under the guise of "fighting vices" and "can't let guilty people get off on technicalities."

Quick history:

Katz v. United States (1967)(Harlan, J. concurring) "[T]here is a twofold requirement, first that a person have exhibited an actual (subjective) expectation of privacy and, second, that the expectation be one that society is prepared to recognize as "reasonable."

United States v. Miller (1976) - This one is most applicable to your argument. I won't cite from it, I will just quote the syllabus.

"Respondent, who had been charged with various federal offenses, made a pretrial motion to suppress microfilms of checks, deposit slips, and other records relating to his accounts at two banks, which maintained the records pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act of 1970 (Act). He contended that the subpoenas Duces tecum pursuant to which the material had been produced by the banks were defective and that the records had thus been illegally seized in violation of the Fourth Amendment. Following denial of his motion, respondent was tried and convicted. The Court of Appeals reversed, having concluded that the subpoenaed documents fell within a constitutionally protected zone of privacy. Held : Respondent possessed no Fourth Amendment interest in the bank records that could be vindicated by a challenge to the subpoenas, and the District Court therefore did not err in denying the motion to suppress."

California v. Greenwood (1988) "Again, we observed that 'a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.'"

I could go on for hours. The more I go in depth into this topic, the higher my risk of high blood pressure resulting in aneurism and substantial risk of ending up ventilated at the hospital for "covid" so I should be careful. It is entirely disturbing the extent to which our rights have been eroded before our eyes, and with our permission. In a lot of cases, we were cheerleading it.

4
Verrerogo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ah. A learned pede.

2
Wallypip3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Some of us have come out the womb fighting it.

0
Devildtails [S] 0 points ago +1 / -1

You should review this:

https://youtu.be/k36_kV-Ur8g

8
MakeMineMassive 8 points ago +8 / -0

There's some folks out there with documentation which suggests that the 16th was never properly ratified. Starting to consider looking more into this fellow by the day.

7
JohnCocktoastin 7 points ago +7 / -0

I went down that rabbit hole. It is inconclusive but leans towards improper ratification. This was so long ago, I am not sure it is a productive use of time. It is only possible to demonstrate circumstantial evidence that it likely did not get properly ratified. But this is like contract formation issues...if you have gone about your business for years acting like you have a contract, a court isn't going to suddenly dissolve it and restore you to your previous condition because something was wrong with the way it was formed.

Because it was over 100 years ago, whatever you'd need to conclusively prove it is long gone.

5
PKShadilay 5 points ago +5 / -0

Violation of the 4th Amendment:

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things ...

5
4more 5 points ago +5 / -0

How about an audit on the federal reserve or Fort Knox or any of these politicians bank accounts

4
libertyforall69 4 points ago +4 / -0

Our government is a criminal organization! Rinos and democrats are stealing the fruits of our labor. The bureaucracy grows by the day! Until people wake up to this fact we are doomed!

4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +5 / -1

Transactions of more than $600. Not the amount in your account. Banks already have to flag anything over $9999.99 for the feds to look at. They do $600 hundred and they're gonna be looking into everyones rent payments every month. And mortgage. And all kinds of shit. I mean $600 is just stupid. I think between that silliness and these idiotic covid mandates the Resident is spouting are just setting biz up to be federalized when they don't comply.

2
covok48 2 points ago +4 / -2

They’re really looking for guns.

4
Siteless_Vagrant 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or ammo purchases. That's really the only thing that makes sense. Or crypto. I think that has hit them a little harder than they want to admit.

1
GentleSlayer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong. Its not 600 transactions. Its all transactions.

4
Schwungle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same place it gives permission for the federal reserve.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
3
CaptainButthurt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right under the part that says "guns r bad m'kay. Trust the gubmint."

3
Gnometard 3 points ago +3 / -0

The constitution doesn't matter anymore.

It won't matter again as long as people keep voting in the same people while crying RINO when they continually fuck us.

We're no longer a republic either.

3
totovader 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do not comply.

Bitcoin solves this.

3
mangoatshark 3 points ago +3 / -0

You spelled monero wrong

3
Rageofpepe 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why would anyone think a faggot that stole an election to help destroy America for the great reset agenda gives a fuck what is legal?

3
SweetCheeses 3 points ago +3 / -0

Time to close the bank account?

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
2
Gooseontheloose 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh my sweet sweet summerchild still thinking the current government gives a flying fuck about the constitution.

2
OoopsItslipped 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m pretty sure the 4th Amendment explicitly prohibits that...

2
Trumpdidit 2 points ago +2 / -0

It doesn't, but you can rest assure your positioned, non elected, member are in complicit stride, with each other, to destroy, conquer, and re-develope this country, using all means at their disposal, legal or not.

2
Pumpitrealgood 2 points ago +2 / -0

just another tool to oppress uppity middle class people that want certain rights. They will target anyone that acts up for audits. Obama style..

2
Coprolite 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its in the section where it outlines the IRS.

2
JBlaze056 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Constitution? I remember hearing something about that document once being important to the United States of America. Now we have a permanently entrenched bureaucracy that is more focused on migrants and leftist nonsense.

2
Joe_Snow 2 points ago +2 / -0

They're getting ready to take guns.

2
muppeton 2 points ago +2 / -0

My banks require me to have at least $2000 in my account or I will have to pay a monthly fee. This is ridiculous.

2
Casidog 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where in the constitution does it say regulations are stronger than law

2
SideofB33f 2 points ago +2 / -0

The same spot it says an income tax is illegal

2
_Cabal_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

As if they care what the constitution does or does not say

2
preludelinux 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bet this being done to target a political rival and mapping out donations .... Then to crush anyone that supports these people...

2
Justlooking250 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden's* communist manifesto

2
556y308 2 points ago +2 / -0

has this been officially enacted?

2
Big-E 2 points ago +2 / -0

Something something fourth amendment something

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Anon89 2 points ago +2 / -0

By the abortion part.

2
notCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's less than a damn paycheck, and most businesses push direct deposit.

2
Underpants 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've never been a crypto nerd... but damn if this isn't the right time and reason to get into it.

2
MocksFordComma 2 points ago +2 / -0

...something something "secure in papers ..." something something ...

OH FUCK ... HERE IT IS:

Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

2
Priopism 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Constitution is completely irrelevant now that elections are fake. The left can change any definition, censor challenge, search anything, ignore anything, and arrest anyone.

1
PEPEpeepee 1 point ago +1 / -0

It actually violates the constitution. Illegal SEARCH and seizure.

1
FromSethWithLove 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it's under the 4th amendment

1
MAGASquatch 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no constitution in a Communist regime. I think you meant to type "manifesto."

1
Badradness 1 point ago +1 / -0

It doesn’t, hang them