1316
Comments (106)
sorted by:
52
uvontheterrible 52 points ago +52 / -0

WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE!!!!!

49
Whoopies_tds 49 points ago +49 / -0

Not if we vaccinate trees before they die

18
deleted 18 points ago +18 / -0
8
residue69 8 points ago +8 / -0

We also need to cover the oceans in a layer of plastic because water vapor is the worst greenhouse gas and they are the largest emitter of ozone damaging chemicals.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
4
loric4882 4 points ago +4 / -0

I came here to blame the oceans too- they are the biggest polluters!

3
DickTick 3 points ago +3 / -0

Well that's just retarded

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
0
LockNload 0 points ago +1 / -1

The what? The steak? Fuck that!

3
tom_of_rj_fame 3 points ago +3 / -0

NOT THIS YEAR! They lit all the wood on fire!! How much 'carbon' is that releasing. LOL.

6
GrayManNumber333 6 points ago +6 / -0

That’s why you have to give more money to the govt!

1
BunnyPicnic 1 point ago +1 / -0

How dare you

36
556x45mm 36 points ago +36 / -0

Now do Volcanoes and oceanic venting...

21
deleted 21 points ago +21 / -0
19
556x45mm 19 points ago +19 / -0

The Sun is the biggest factor on our climate. Not many know about Jupiter's gravitational pull on the planets orbit which gradually changes our climate as well.

20
Toollespaulhero 20 points ago +20 / -0

Bro stop acting like we don’t live in a vacuum. Nothing outside our atmosphere has any affect on anything. Especially the giant fireball in the sky that makes it hot when it’s in the sky. Don’t even come at me with conspiracies like Milankovich cycles!

10
Shinydenim 10 points ago +10 / -0

I swear if I hear one more nut job talking about Solar Magnetic Output data or oceanic surface temperatures being everywhere warmer than the atmosphere I’m gonna start wearing a 3rd mask so I don’t have to subject myself to whatever Omicron variant you crazies are mutating bc you don’t have your 3rd booster yet

4
556x45mm 4 points ago +4 / -0

Fuck this, imma go back into my mom's basement and watch some my little pony porn

2
LibertarianXian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Plants breath carbon dioxide, so that means if we cut carbon dioxide emissions, more plants can grow!

2
South_Florida_Guy 2 points ago +2 / -0

And termites!

16
13
nozonozo 13 points ago +13 / -0

Those Damn Trees! It's as if nature has them supplying Carbon for living organisms to survive.

7
Imransgarage 7 points ago +7 / -0

Quick make them into houses for the environment!!!!

1
goat_nebula 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol they still tried to say “muh climate change” is making trees die thus making more climate change.

It happens most in tropical areas so the rainforests are causing climate change now.

All jokes aside, this planet cycles through more carbon emissions naturally in a year than humans manufacture in a decade, probably more.

14
EJay_Scott 14 points ago +14 / -0

Something something.... decaying bundles of sticks...something something.....DC swamp....

There's a joke in there somewhere...

7
x79q3pb 7 points ago +7 / -0

Been a hot minute since seeing bundle of sticks memes!

12
CovfefeVideo 12 points ago +12 / -0

Carbon Dioxide - It's what plants crave.

11
EddieBooth 11 points ago +11 / -0

Good it's all reabsorbed by plants: it's their food

10
KuzoKevin 10 points ago +10 / -0

California now has a reason to manage their forests more effectively.

Reduce forest fires and save the planet from dead tree farts.

8
TwitterIsTrash 8 points ago +8 / -0

LOL that would mean people cutting down the rainforest are actually helping the climate by liberal logic. The irony.

4
JCox 4 points ago +4 / -0

Oxygen is pretty cool though so I see their POV on cutting them down.

2
covfefe-time 2 points ago +2 / -0

Let's try to offset our carbon footprint with Solar Panels, Windmills, and lithium batteries, because none of that stuff is massively destructive and wasteful on the environment....

Can't we just have a plan to plant 25 percent more trees than we remove through construction and building material???

There's plenty of space on Earth to rehab and plant new forests if anyone gave half a fuck and decided to do something with their time besides acting like self-serving, entitled shitbags.

3
Comntrinchief 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is nothing wrong with carbon though.

2
covfefe-time 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, I see that point. The false pretenses created by those with an agenda should be addressed first before we fall in to the trap.

Still, you can probably reduce energy usage considerably by planting a few well placed trees around your house rather than paying some BS carbon tax, or screwing with ridiculous amounts of solar panels.

Long story short, if you want to 'go green' plant some trees to reduce local temperatures, while preserving your environment.

And maybe save the solar panels for your off-grid setup, instead of trying to power an entire city with destructive government overreach and political kickbacks.

1
Powdered_Sugar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of Earth's oxygen comes from sea plants like seaweed. Terrestrial forests help, but are not the primary producers.

Also, there's evidence that the rainforest is man made, something about the tree spacing of the oldest trees being too regular to have occurred naturally. Incidentally, that should give us hope because it means we could theoretically reinvigorate large swaths of forest of we mange them correctly.

7
BurtMcGirt 7 points ago +7 / -0

Lemme guess. The communists' plan will be "Reeeeeeeeeeeeeee! Tax people for decaying wood!"

2
jughaid 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yep, well see patrols in the neighborhood counting sticks in your yard and sending you a bill....

7
CrusadingPowerUser 7 points ago +7 / -0

off gassing of wood..

I wonder if people know by super heating wood you can turn it into a combustible gas.

People are fucking stupid

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
4
2
LibertarianXian 2 points ago +2 / -0

If that's not an indication these people hate life and want to kill it, I dunno what is.

2
preferredfault 2 points ago +2 / -0

Even if you compare it to human emissions, the difference is plants have been doing it for hundreds of millions of years. At that point, even 10,000 years of modern emissions combined, would be a drop in the bucket in comparison.

I think many of their misconceptions about CO2 greenhouse is made based largely on guesses involving Mars.

A big problem with science today, other than it being perverted to fill agenda's, is that there are many theories that aren't actually proven science, and are likely wrong or even provably wrong, that are still treated as proven science because people behaved as if it was proven and for them it's just a fact.

We've gotten to the point where we have theories built on top of theories, yet even those theories built of top of theories are treated as universal fact. We see this not just in astronomy, but also in things like climate change.

Heck, even almost all the sensors used to detect local temperature changes across the country, were found to be incorrectly placed, and were carelessly put near artificial heat sources. And this is one of the main systems used as a basis to "prove" man made global warming exists.

6
FetAnka 6 points ago +6 / -0

Any reasonable sane person would use this information to end all climate fear mongering and useless taxes on fossil fuels. Libtards and environmentalist muppets will instead tax the shit out of forest owners, forcing them to sell their forest to the government at minimum price.

6
raytwentynine 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol .. I saw some dumbass online telling folks to compost so biotrash didn't end up decomposing in a landfill... I didn't have the heart to tell them the same CO2 is released regardless.

2
Powdered_Sugar 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, at least the compost is useful at home and doesn't get tainted with the toxic chemicals at a landfill.

Dude's still totally wrong, but he'll still benefit from the idea.

4
Thirsty_Liberty_Tree 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here come the zoning officers walking through your woods marking and cataloging the fallen and widowmakers to fine you for your failure to remove them.

3
Filetsmignon 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is dumb. It's carbon neutral. Trees take in CO2 during their growth then release it when they die and decompose. The cycle is carbon neutral.

1
Powdered_Sugar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Given that matter can't be created or destroyed, and that carbon is a basic building block of pretty much all life on Earth, all life and death is effectively carbon neutral.

The problem, and the reason this is important, is that one of the climate peoples' big arguments is that there's "too much" carbon in the atmosphere, and that that's humanity's fault. This shows that humanity has very little effect on carbon levels compared to what nature does as part of it's natural cycle.

3
CrouchingKamala 3 points ago +3 / -0

So we are referring to Biden as dead wood now?

3
CrouchingKamala 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually it would probably be more apt for John Kerry.

3
AntsCamera 3 points ago +3 / -0

Burn down the Rainforests!

3
CrouchingKamala 3 points ago +3 / -0

How much carbon emissions does a million migrants produce? Asking for a fren.

3
CrouchingKamala 3 points ago +3 / -0

Alot more than the cattle I'll bet.

3
jus74funpa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nature is working as intended..

3
firestorm117 3 points ago +3 / -0

Let's not get started on how California needs to clean up their fucking forests of said dead wood because they keep catching on fire and releasing EVEN MORE CO2 into the air and fucking covering 3/4 of the country in smog! Skies in Colorado finally fucking cleared up after a month and a half of their shit, almost as bad as last year when fucking Antifa was intentionally setting shit on fire!

Fucking hippies need to fuck off with that bullshit and clean their own fucking states up first before demanding anything from us.

2
acasper 2 points ago +2 / -0

Now it makes sense why Newsom is burning all the trees. They're the real polluters.

2
nadlersskidmark 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need a meme with Greta Thunburg giving her signature dirty look to a tree with the caption "How Dare you!"

2
GrayManNumber333 2 points ago +2 / -0

Next they’ll want wood buried where it can’t rot and call plant waste pollution.

2
FFSakeCameBack 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is where they cut down all of the trees and bury them.

2
Come-mistertallyman 2 points ago +2 / -0

but it's what PLANTS CRAVE!

2
Comntrinchief 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is the enemy we have been waiting for.

2
PM_ME_UR_VIVOZ 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh noes we better go kill all the trees otherwise we're DOOOOOOOMED

Anyone who believes the climate genie bullshit deserves all the scorn they get.

2
VonBustacap 2 points ago +2 / -0

Time to get rid of the trees.

2
Do_the_Math 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait until they find out what the scumbag volcanos been doing.

2
PonySoldier66 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think I just farted.

2
LibertarianXian 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uh, you better check your diaper, Joe!

1
YN31964 1 point ago +1 / -0

So....what do they suggest? We get rid of wood?

1
nothingberg 1 point ago +1 / -0

diapers on decaying wood. it's the only way we can get to zero

1
preferredfault 1 point ago +1 / -0

This one fact alone proves that man made climate change is not a thing. And let's keep in mind, plants have been doing this for hundreds of millions of years. All of human consumption is barely even a drop in the bucket.

How long until they start waging war on tree's? It's going to come full circle, going from wanting to save the natural environment to wanting to destroy it and replace it with artificial tree's that produce oxygen.

1
SaltyDoggy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ho lee fuk. We need to immediately remove all forests from the earth to save the earth.

1
Bubblegumbro 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’ll fight the good fight. I save about 2-3 cords a year from rotting...... by burning that shit to heat my house. Smoking out the neighbor hood

1
LibertarianXian 1 point ago +1 / -0

Gives it that comfy, toasty smell

nothing like it

1
SilverBackTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

No wonder the left doesn’t want to manage forests properly.

1
TGNX 1 point ago +1 / -0

And?

1
FreeNow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm...maybe burn it to create energy instead of letting it rot. Then you could burn less nat gas, etc. But someone will protest and chain themselves to a tree because if you let it rot that is natural but using biomass for energy is destroying the forest.

1
Crapachino 1 point ago +1 / -0

Replace all trees with wind generators!

1
iSignedUpForThis 1 point ago +1 / -0

As we learned in Futurama, the solution to global warming is ever larger ice cubes dumped in the ocean. This solving the problem forever.

1
Tailgunnerjoe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only about ten percent of atmospheric CO2 is man made. Less than one percent of the atmosphere is CO2. Do the math. Science.

1
Americanapplepie 1 point ago +1 / -0

Soooooooo......we gotta get rid of trees now? I’m confusion....😬

1
TheSphinxIsAFag 1 point ago +1 / -0

So we should clear the forests of dead wood which is something the liberals don't want to do because it's bad for the environment? But actually they're contributing to what liberals believe as "global warming"? Which will also help prevent and stall wildfires?

This isn't Kafkaesque, but it certainly makes me laugh.

1
mobgrazer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Human emission of carbon has always been known to be a small percent of the carbon cycle.

Too bad, the extra emitted carbon helps plants grow better.

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

we can sequester more of that carbon (and, more important, methane) by converting more of that wood into treated lumber

1
vigilant_citizen 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's all that mycelium. How else are we going to grow medicinal mushrooms?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
MrTexan 1 point ago +1 / -0

One of the founders of Greenpeace made this same point to refute the assertion that the rain forest was the ‘lungs of the world’. He said old growth rain forest consumed more oxygen than they produced because of the decaying wood.

1
HangtownBill 1 point ago +1 / -0

Guess I'll skip planting a tree on Arbor Day.

1
SALTYBALLS 1 point ago +1 / -0

PHOTOSYNTHESIS. DEBATE OVER