2994
Comments (141)
sorted by:
192
SuperFreedomMan 192 points ago +192 / -0

I'm shooting any government official that tries to confiscate my firearms. Period.

This is nonnegotiable. I was born a free man, I'll die a free man.

121
MastaJoda 121 points ago +121 / -0

This, and I’ll go a step further by promising to shoot any government buttfuck that tries to confiscate my neighbors guns as well. You cock suckers better watch your 6 when you go grabbing guns. Bet

48
TheRougarou 48 points ago +52 / -4

And you better be able to watch your six from up to 500 yards.

23
BigMikey 23 points ago +23 / -0

I think a decent AR-10 with a 20 inch barrel and a good scope can get good accuracy up to 700 yards. Seems like the perfect chance to call in on a fake number with a fake ID to report a red flag and ambush the people that show up to take it. Call in to an address to an abandoned lot or something and be sitting up on a hill a few hundred yards out fire one shot one kill and boogie on out of there before they can figure out where it came from. Don't wait for them to come to you.

26
Big_Al_42223 26 points ago +26 / -0

Its called guerrilla warfare, homie. And most effective insurgencies incorporate a broad spectrum approach. Quit thinking low level like what you see in movies like Red Dawn. They’ll never run out of low paid idiots with guns and uniforms to throw at you.

Here’s what we really need control of:

  1. Critical infrastructure
  2. Leadership.
  3. Elections and media.
  4. Courts and law enforcement
  5. Education centers

Insurgencies never go after the hard targets. That’s suicide. A successful insurgency gains control where they can and gets rid of anyone they can’t. Its actions are always measured and calculated to move forward their agenda and seldom engages in rash behaviors.

We will eventually have the numbers and capacity to fight the NWO uniforms but not before gutting all of their political support first.

2
Wearyman 2 points ago +2 / -0

We also need things like Police Scanners AND the encrypted radios the SWAT folks use so you know when they are coming.

1
Big_Al_42223 1 point ago +1 / -0

Encrypted radios don’t listen to each other by default. You either need the encryption key or the largest quantum computer in the world and about five years.

We can use them to communicate to each other but the position can still be triangulated. VPNs used in conjunction with TORs have proven themselves to be quite safe end to end communication because it encrypts and bounces around messages globally in a network. I strongly urge anyone online to use both of these.

1
Wearyman 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was thinking just for listening in. We would obviously need the keys. That's where a "Blue Pede" could help the frens out. There has to be some out there.

1
Inquisitor_Corvus 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only our infrastructure wasn’t in such terrible condition…….

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
2
CPTRVB 2 points ago +2 / -0

6.5 Grendel has entered the chat -

4
680-EVIL 4 points ago +4 / -0

Cheytac just entered the chat.

1
BigDickTurner 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Reverse-Swatting", perhaps?

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
IGfodder 11 points ago +18 / -7

This. They know people will react this way, they'll have sharpshooters ready to take people's heads off the second they open their door and make a violent move.

46
TheRougarou 46 points ago +46 / -0

They can’t kill us all. I’ll die a free man, thanks.

22
IGfodder 22 points ago +22 / -0

By no means am I saying give up. I'm just saying watch out, I too would rather die on my feet then live on my knees.

-2
Paxelmania -2 points ago +2 / -4

I wouldn't but I don't mind collectively helping to LARP about being that brave if it makes them back off

-5
Sybill -5 points ago +1 / -6

Omg, that is absolutely fabulous !!!

8
IGfodder 8 points ago +8 / -0

And I was agreeing with you? Why you down vote me? Lol

5
TheRougarou 5 points ago +6 / -1

I didn’t. I gave u an upvote.

12
ObamaSUCKSdicks 12 points ago +12 / -0

Who the fuck is opening the door for them?

10
deleted 10 points ago +10 / -0
2
marvinthehaggler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Buy a shotgun!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
8
NotAnotherNPC 8 points ago +8 / -0

Doorbell cams with buffered recording times. So if they cover the camera when at the door, you can rewind and see who tf they are before you open it.

4
680-EVIL 4 points ago +4 / -0

Add a hidden camera that is powered by a backup battery in case they cut electricity.

3
NotAnotherNPC 3 points ago +3 / -0

They cut my power... instant red flag .... idgaf if it's my mom cutting the power.

2
680-EVIL 2 points ago +3 / -1

The lesson is you don't make your stand like this. They will take you out in seconds and will call you and your friends terrorists. Do it stealthily. Plan. Prepare. Organize. Learn.

1
markolbb 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is ideal but it's soon getting to the point that we will have lost our chance for that.

1
Big_dons_nuts 1 point ago +1 / -0

Try 1000

1
TheRougarou 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can hit a silhouette target at 1000 yards, but trying to hit a moving target seeking cover is a dif story.

2
markolbb 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah people who haven't shot long range have no idea how difficult it is and how many variables there are to account for.

I made it to 1348yds last weekend with my 20" .308 and factory loads. At that distance the bullet is falling like a rock, already went trans then subsonic and is totally unrealistic to eliminate a 2-legged target. I hit a mile for the first time but it wasn't my rifle (Bergara .300PRC with handloads).

Shooting long range is fun but it's not how we will win against those seeking to remove our firearms.

1
UnitedStatesofSmash 1 point ago +1 / -0

My .300 Win Mag would like a word about "up to 500 yds"

4
utfanx2 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is the way.

2
pente1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your legal out for an alleged threat, they must first admit they are a buttfuck in order to have felt threatened.

.

I'm not a lawyer so maybe you can't count on this ....

8
pente1776 8 points ago +8 / -0

Although publicly speaking of violence was never my thing. You got an upvote.

5
SteelMongoose 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only problem with this is that you end up fighting with functionaries while the "officials" needn't fear for themselves.

2
NarrativeControl 2 points ago +2 / -0

Where I'm from, every man, woman, and child can shoot the tail off a squirel at 75 yards. Mother fucking faggots that try that shit won't make it very far.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
SuperFreedomMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Have to catch them where they live or work."

That is how I feel about people pushing mandatory vaccines.

73
YoMamma2020 73 points ago +73 / -0

The "conspiracy" theorists have been right about every single thing about this pandemic. Anyone who thinks this will not be used is the actual crazy person. They will try to name ANYONE who voted for Trump, a domestic terrorist and red flag them.

39
MastaJoda 39 points ago +39 / -0

Yup. They’ll go through your bank accounts, and if you donated to Trump...Terrorist. These mfs are walking on thin ice. Americans won’t comply with their medical tyranny, nor will we ever turn over our arms to such a corrupt, anti American, anti constitutional, and anti individual freedom UniParty faggot filled, communist government. Period. This is the hill THEY die on.

55
Groundpounder 55 points ago +55 / -0

Hopefully the Senate pimp-slaps that garbage. It was tucked into the defense spending bill, like most dastardly things are.

27
summerbreeze 27 points ago +27 / -0

Yep, this is how the US press is able to do propaganda now; it was hidden in the NDAA bill Obama signed in 2013.

12
BigIronBigIron 12 points ago +12 / -0

this is how the US press is able to do propaganda now

I don't consider the American press American. Literally or figuratively.

4
marvinthehaggler 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is such a good point.

The "American Press" is Globohomo and does not give one flying fuck about us or our institutions or documents.

42
Valiant_Thor 42 points ago +46 / -4

The second amendment, or amendment II of the United States Constitution, commonly known as the right to bear arms, is the amendment that guarantees the right of an individual to keep and bear arms. The phrase "right to bear arms" refers to the right, as set forth in the amendment, for people to bear arms as they please, so long as their actions do not constitute a threat to others. The amendment is sometimes referred to as the right to keep and bear arms, or simply the right to bear arms. The right to bear arms is subject to federal and state regulation in the exercise of the power to regulate commerce. The language of the amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed," is known as the Second Amendment. The term "Militia" is a term of art used to mean an organized fighting force that constitutes a portion of the people, in contrast with the ordinary term, which refers to the ordinary people or citizenry who are members of a nation's armed forces. "Well regulated" is often read as a guarantee that militias are subject to some form of regulation. "A well regulated militia" is usually interpreted to mean that state militias are well regulated. The Framers of the Constitution understood the phrase to mean that a standing federal army or organized militia (in time of war) was a threat to liberty and that ordinary citizens were to be armed to serve as a check on the power of the military. The phrase was understood to imply that individuals could keep arms for defense in a militia. The term "the people" did not occur in the original text. The phrase "the people" is an addition made in various state ratification debates during the early and mid-18th century. It was meant to signify a right that people had to keep and bear arms that was inalienable.

20
AmericanJawa 20 points ago +20 / -0

Paragraph breaks are your friend.

4
BlackPillBot 4 points ago +5 / -1

NO BRAKES!!!

4
Quietam_Unum 4 points ago +4 / -0

"A well regulated militia" is usually interpreted to mean that state militias are well regulated.

That sentence seems a little odd to me. Anyhow, "regulated" in the context of the 2nd is not the modern "rules and regulations" definition. Rather "regulated" meant well trained, organized and functioning at peak performance. (See pendulum clocks with "Regulator" painted on the case. https://image.invaluable.com/housePhotos/Converse/75/566675/H3969-L74071710.jpg )

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
4
TrumpWon12348584 4 points ago +4 / -0

Nope

2
TheNakedGenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Username checks out

29
WhiteTrashJesus 29 points ago +29 / -0

The red flag law is for those subject to UCMJ. Yes they want to use it for people who wont get vaccinated in the military. Maybe they should have thought about that Possibility the last 10 months

32
deleted 32 points ago +32 / -0
19
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 19 points ago +19 / -0

They have been specific in targeting vets for a long time. They recognize the threat of well trained dissenters.

6
The_End_Arrives 6 points ago +6 / -0

Well we need a few well trained groups who do bad things in the night to tyrants.

2
zigmund_fraud 2 points ago +3 / -1

I'm only good for LARPing, but I agree. I would also count the press as being tyrants by virtue of colluding with them.

0
Sybill 0 points ago +1 / -1

There's a whole lot of $$$$ being paid out , me thinks

1
Fizz 1 point ago +1 / -0

At the time of colonial overrule or at the time the constitution was ratified?

1
Sybill 1 point ago +2 / -1

Dishonorable discharge, f'ing disgusting and disgraceful. These people have served under the most direst of times and now they shall face a dishonorable discharge, it makes me 😫

15
Greatunmatchedwisdom 15 points ago +15 / -0

Send bachelors

12
TheNakedGenius 12 points ago +12 / -0

We're still kicking Bill Mitchell in the nuts though, right? That faggtard.

3
Sodium_miner 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am

2
Ullyr_Atreides 2 points ago +2 / -0

He blocked me on Gab

10
hiddensfinger 10 points ago +11 / -1

"Why do you need a handgun" because when I walk up to the prey skittering on the ground I'm not gonna use my rifle on it.

9
I_am_the_glowie 9 points ago +9 / -0

We need to face the fact that we have been sold out by every politician. It's over. We have to restart the system.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
9
NavyGuy 9 points ago +10 / -1

It only applies to the military... for now. Not that it makes it any better. Its total bullshit. But spreading this misinformation around doesn't benefit anybody.

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-117hr4350rh/pdf/BILLS-117hr4350rh.pdf

Page 190-303

6
680-EVIL 6 points ago +6 / -0

They want the patriot soldiers who refused the jab not to be able to have arms once SHTF. Obvious.

3
NavyGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Clearly. Plus what they do us they plan on doing g or "trying" to do to civilians later. We are the test platform. One inch at a time... theyre trying to fuck us.

4
lolpaladins 4 points ago +4 / -0

It actually makes it worse.

No differently than how first they apply the mask mandate to only blue states, and then only at airports... and then the vaccine mandate only comes first to health care workers, and then only if you work for an evil globalist corporation, and then only if you are government employee, and then only if you work for a company with 100 or more employees and ....

They do it intentionally because they know they can slow boil the frog.

It is worse because it is done with evil intent.

2
NavyGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make no mistake... they want us dead. They are in death cult... I just like to be specific and accurate when I call the pedo incest satan worshiping murdering communist faggots to the mat. Specifics matter in this information warfare landscape we find ourselves in.

Welcome to the newest frontier and battle space.

9
420TrumpDaddy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Ok this is not entirely accurate, but the actual bill is no better. Essentially they have given military judges unchecked power to determine if an armed forces member is allowed to have a gun or not AFTER they have left the military and become a private citizen. This I another crucial step in their purge of the military as is done by all communist regimes. They know that the boots on the ground would turn on these marxists generals. Especially the ones forced out by the jab, so they're taking their guns away.

5
IntergalacticWalrus 5 points ago +5 / -0

What is your evidence for this applying to people after they’ve left the military? The text reads for those under the UCMJ.

1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

There may be a way to apply this to retirees and members of the IRR - even if you leave active duty, you may have some basic service obligation left and this puts you in the IRR, which means you are subject to recall. It’s rare, but people have been recalled to active duty for the purpose of putting them on trial.

If you were ever a commissioned officer and never affirmatively resigned your commission, you should do so now. It’s a letter, man.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
shaven_llama 1 point ago +1 / -0

And retirees drawing retirement pay are subject to recall, btw.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
EvilGuy 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is fine really. We need some inciting incidents to happen to get people scared out of their complacency.

Keep boiling the pot Dems, some of us want this civil war to kick off already.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
5
Snowdone 5 points ago +6 / -1

Matt the people grifter Gaetz did as well.

4
AllTheWayTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

All part of the plan.

4
Warrior_Master_Race 4 points ago +4 / -0

IF…WHEN THEY COME DONE GIVE UP YOUR GUNS WE OUT NUMBER THEM 100,000 TO 1

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

The GOP are totally on board with the collapse.

3
shaven_llama 3 points ago +3 / -0

Things like this are how. No door-to-door searches, no mass confiscations, just picking people off one by one.

3
NineteenEightyTwo [S] 3 points ago +4 / -1

The people will nazi it coming. Just like before.

2
TheNakedGenius 2 points ago +2 / -0

kek...who downvoted this zinger? Goebbels' grandson?

3
DangerousAmerican76 3 points ago +4 / -1

So the question to federal, state, and local law enforcement:

Y’all ganna die in my front yard to get my arms?

Shit going to get real very fast IF this gets past the SENATE

2
shaven_llama 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’ll need to use Nasty Girls outside of cities. Most rural sheriffs aren’t stupid.

0
DangerousAmerican76 0 points ago +1 / -1

Most nasties are local yokals, who ganna stare down a site for the super corrupt uncle satan

2
CensoredByMarxists 2 points ago +2 / -0

I asked my 5 year-old what the GOP stands for. He said "Gobs Of Poop" Somebody needs to make a meme...

2
DennJW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every single RINO who voted for this must die.

2
based_trekkie 2 points ago +2 / -0

The only shooting allowed is FROM the government SLAVE!

2
Elariom23 2 points ago +2 / -0

He sounded surprised that the GOP went aong with it. You're not gonna do anything about this but go to work the next day mad.

2
Johnny108 2 points ago +2 / -0

I may die in a ditch, but I will be lying in a bed of brass...

1
Beef_Vegan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't figure out who wants us to revolt more, the government or us? I swear to god they're trying to get us to revolt but you're funny if you don't think we we're looking for the opportunity to fix this bullshit.

1
EagleOverTriumph 1 point ago +1 / -0

The people in DC don't need to be jabbed, sounds like a red flag to me.

1
walmartsux 1 point ago +1 / -0

Come and take it. This is a line that will not be crossed!

1
pente1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

The left can't meme.

.

Only terrorists have good memes.

1
lul_cheto 1 point ago +1 / -0

But guys.. w/o the republican party we have no voice.. so we have no choice.. keep sending in those donation checks

1
gaijin_ronin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stack up for the breach. Makes targeting easier.

1
redditbiggay 1 point ago +1 / -0

no surprise there

1
ChynahIzAzzhole 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes... they're locking down military that say.. No.

1
visitor998 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can someone send me a link to read about this? what bill was it?

1
mainsoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really the GOP always going along with it is the main problem.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
680-EVIL 1 point ago +1 / -0

RED FLAG LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL

1
PorcupineKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Do you have a link to this information? I've been trying to find it and come up with nothing.

1
Hippopoonis 1 point ago +1 / -0

It still has to pass the Senate. Which it won't.

1
ForgotmyPWGodBTRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

I totally agree..what the actual fuck...free reign to punish those you do not like/enemies...this won't turn out well for anyone!

1
SHILL_DETECTOR 1 point ago +1 / -0

you can do more damage when you dont have guns

1
LoobintheToobin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Especially when you can be reported as dangerous by others...

1
ComebackKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hopefully the Senate kills it...that's what we are down to.

1
ShitOfPeace 1 point ago +1 / -0

They'll use every single excuse possible to deny you your rights.

Stop negotiating with people that don't believe in 2A as a concept. They're trying to push it as far as possible because they don't believe in the right to bear arms at all.

Their goal isn't to stop at red flag laws. Their goal is to get rid of your right to bear arms entirely.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
dagoat4l 1 point ago +1 / -0

So one step closer to communism. Might want to get your flags ready.

1
PatriotSkorzeny 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bring it? Lol

1
SirSelrahc 1 point ago +1 / -0

I keep seeing people say they will sue over this.... sorry to break this to you but MOST lawyers are left cucks. They ooze political bias. Not all, but most.

1
POTUS_DonnieJ 1 point ago +1 / -0

Congress hasn’t passed it… yet. The Senate can still shut this shit down.

Little hope though.

1
DicerningSword 1 point ago +1 / -0

Helping conservative see how they are being abused and deceived by their "leadership" is not easy, conservatives are well conservative it's hard for the to let go of things even false things...

1
YN31964 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's the plan, man.