3350
The mental gymnastics and the cope are all so pathetic. (media.patriots.win)             LITERALLY HITLER! 
posted ago by Ghostof_PatrickHenry ago by Ghostof_PatrickHenry +3350 / -0
Comments (367)
sorted by:
449
RedditStillSucks 449 points ago +449 / -0

So basically they are saying they are even more totalitarian than Hitler?

I'm not sure that's a good argument.

196
projectfreedom 196 points ago +196 / -0

"You know who else liked vanilla ice cream? Hitler, that's who!"

What are we, five? This is the ultimate playground smackdown.

88
JESUSJUGS 88 points ago +89 / -1

You know who else was an actual vegan and liked Soylent? HITLER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

56
acasper 56 points ago +57 / -1

Hitler wanted to ban the consumption of meat following the war.

9
DuzzentMatta 9 points ago +15 / -6

Hitler apparently had an incredibly small penis and liked women to deuce on him during sex.

10
LiteraIIyHitIer 10 points ago +11 / -1

Iss meine Scheiße!

8
halcyondream 8 points ago +8 / -0

Reminds me of the Steele Dossier. His enemies say it? Gotta be true.

4
Julius_Severus 4 points ago +8 / -4

I enjoy how gay and Jewish people constantly accuse Hitler of being gay and Jewish

"He was the most evil man in history and he was one of us!"

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
6
acasper 6 points ago +8 / -2

Wouldn't be at all surprised.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Eru1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hitler had 1 testicle and had African DNA in his bloodline, and was jewish.

-24
getkek -24 points ago +23 / -47

My god, the parasite theory grows stronger by the day. Meat is a huge contributor to parasitic infection. And Hitler must have known which group was behind the vaccines. Should I give a hint?

Abolishes vaccines, abolishes meat. Based hitler.

30
Sweetpede 30 points ago +36 / -6

Dude you’re a fucking idiot.

16
getkek 16 points ago +18 / -2

Am I really being taken literally? Mental gymnastics.

Come on.

17
PedemusPrime 17 points ago +18 / -1

I thought the sarcasm was strong but a /s will always save the day

6
Sweetpede 6 points ago +6 / -0

So you’re joking?

2
TheEvacuator 2 points ago +3 / -1

This shit is hilarious lmao.

1
Groupthinkgroupthink 1 point ago +1 / -0

The reality is the nuance of sarcasm doesn't carry via text well, because there's no audible tone, or abnormal facial expression to accompany the statement to clue in the reader / hearer.

It's a shame to ruin good takes with an /s but sometimes it's needed.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
7
Julius_Severus 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hitler wasn't vegan. He ate dairy and eggs. He didn't even go full vegetarian until the last years of his life.

His cook also admitted she used to sneak meat stock into his food because she was worried he wasn't getting proper nutrition. Which is a story that always made me laugh because Marge does that to her vegetarian daughter on the Simpsons.

6
gillonba 6 points ago +6 / -0

How about that. Germany didn't lose the war until the last years of his life either. Irrefutable proof that vegetarians lose wars. I wonder how many vegetarians we have at the pentagon?

2
Julius_Severus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Vegetarianism is indeed awful

Many of the coolest cultures throughout global history have their genesis as pastoralists

9
Julius_Severus 9 points ago +11 / -2

"You know who else hated Marxists? Hitler! You know who else hated children being exposed to pornography and transexual nonsense? Hitler! You know who else hated globalist bankers and media moguls? Hitler!"

Wait...

8
Druid_Con 8 points ago +8 / -0

He probably had two scoops

5
2
TheEvacuator 2 points ago +4 / -2

They need to photoshop Biden there.

0
Julius_Severus 0 points ago +2 / -2

An ice cream that won't subvert your nation!

3
ImVoting4Trump 3 points ago +3 / -0

The adults are back in charge!

63
OrangeElvis 63 points ago +65 / -2

Hitler also villianized Jews as carriers of Typhoid - so their point really doesn't hold water. U stabbed are the new Jews.

36
projectfreedom 36 points ago +36 / -0

Also accused them of being privileged and propagating a rape culture.

30
Chosimbaone 30 points ago +30 / -0

And of having no culture of their own. The more I learn about how they spoke about the Jews in world war II, the crazier it gets.

22
projectfreedom 22 points ago +23 / -1

Yep, it worked back then and it is being used for that reason now.

9
AmericanMan00 9 points ago +9 / -0

It's like the Democrat's are using the Rwanda Genocide as their playbook.

"Leading up to the genocide, there were 294 instances of the RTLM accusing the Rwandan Patriotic Army of atrocities against the Hutu, along with 252 broadcasts that call for Hutus to kill the Tutsis.[107] One such broadcast stated, "Someone must ... make them disappear for good ... to wipe them from human memory ... to exterminate the Tutsi from the surface of the earth."[109] By the time the violence began, the young Hutu population had absorbed months of racist propaganda that characterized all Tutsis as dangerous enemies that must be killed before they seized control of the country."

Sound familiar?

1
Klown_Schwab 1 point ago +1 / -0

muh Jan 6th insurrection

0
DeplorableGerman 0 points ago +6 / -6

Conviently forgetting the GERMAN jews who were GERMANS and shared GERMAN culture and fought bravely for Kaiser and Vaterland during the First World War.

Hears distant screeching from ConPro Oh boy, here they come again...

Edit: C'mon, ConPro, you can make it to -9! That would be a very N O I C E ratio.

5
Chosimbaone 5 points ago +6 / -1

I feel like your comment is being misinterpreted, but you're exactly right. They had and have a culture. But acting as if all the "enemy" does is co-opt other people's shit makes them seem worse. One of the easiest examples is "There is no 'British Tea'" as if the fact that tea originated in china means that Britain stole English tea time from them, instead of making their own thing with it.

3
DeplorableGerman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wouldn't care about ethnicity if there wasn't a very obvious plot to get rid of whites. To that extent i can and will follow certain streams of thought. But to act as if every singular individual who is not of your "tribe" is some enemy to be hunted and brutalized shows a lack of empathy and a lack of reason. I'm sure a bunch of those ConsumeProduct troglofags would love to beat me up or kill me - Which is not the hallmark of a well-adjusted person or a reasonable standpoint. If your first real-life reaction to someone challenging your ideology would be violence, chances are you are in fact the baddies.

RE: My post. I stand by what i said. Those jEwS were german jews, born in germany, generations past. Indistinguishable if not for geneaology (spelling) and some made-up charts. Just entertain this notion for a second: If the Second World War had JUST been a regular territorial war without any overbearing, overt racism/ethnicism and overbearing political noncery, i bet these german jews that were brutalized and hunted like animals would have gladly GLADLY joined the Wehrmacht to fight for their Vaterland again.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
DeplorableGerman 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hahahaha. Nice. I truly rattled the ConsumeCocksForFun beehive. Go on, lil' Nazis, comb through my post history and downvote every single one of them. Your seething only makes me stronger HAHAHAHAHA. Troglofag looooosers. Absolute LOOOOOOOOOSERS.

6
2
Vink 2 points ago +3 / -1

...and about 100 porn producers.

-2
Sweetpede -2 points ago +1 / -3

What I can’t believe is that the nazis still have idiotic fanboys like you.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
2
Sweetpede 2 points ago +3 / -1

Faggot. You’ll never be a real woman.

4
deleted 4 points ago +5 / -1
1
Vink 1 point ago +3 / -2

Both of which are true.

7
FloppyDisks 7 points ago +11 / -4

Is Typhoid a Jew thing? Or a anybody thing in the 1930's?

24
OrangeElvis 24 points ago +25 / -1

It is an anybody thing Hitler made into a Jew thing.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +14 / -16
2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
-3
deleted -3 points ago +7 / -10
3
OrangeElvis 3 points ago +17 / -14

You are conflating gassing and burning now. Just fucking don't. There are literally thousands of witness testimonies and film evidence of the Holocaust. Fuck all the way off.

1
OrangeElvis 1 point ago +22 / -21

It was cyanide - a most potent (and cheap) poison. You are a sick fuckcake to suggest millions of people that were murdered were somehow just victims of their own ethnicity-prone illness (while being being crammed together and worked as slaves while being starved to death).

8
Trumpternal 8 points ago +13 / -5

Gas chambers are a total lie. We've been fed nothing but lies about the hoaxocaust. don't @ me.

0
LibertyPrimeWasRight 0 points ago +2 / -2

Even if the gas chambers are a lie, is "I rounded up 11 million undesirables, forced them into slave camps, and then they died because of disease and starvation" really that much better? It's exactly what we rightly criticize the gulags for.

0
DeplorableGerman 0 points ago +4 / -4

@ you with malicious intent We can argue about the MODUS of execution all day long. But upwards of 6 million europeans just...vanished. And if i had to guess, i'd say that a lot of their remains can be found in european soil, or in museums. The NatSocs literally talked about their plans, with great pride. Why the PHACK are you apologists still questioning the Holocaust. If the NatSocs were sooo clean and sooo innocent, why would they flee, why would they take on new identities and why would they try to wash their hands in ignorance after the fact.

The NatSocs are guilty. Guilty of many crimes. And the Holocaust is one of them. And before you screech "Jew-lover" or any other noncery at me - Individuals are not their entire ethnicity. And Israel can eat a bag of high explosive dick-shaped munitions for its crimes against humanity.

-1
TheEvacuator -1 points ago +2 / -3

Proof? Source?

Not saying you wrong, but some evidence would be nice.

3
FloppyDisks 3 points ago +10 / -7

I have a canister of it unopened. You want to come open it? It was used by troops too retard. Why do you think they have thousands of little half coffee size canisters staged when you walk in there. They couldn't even put it in 55 gal drums? Amazing

-8
OrangeElvis -8 points ago +12 / -20

They didn't need to. It is cyanide. Released into a small chamber crammed full of people is like setting off a firecracker in your tightly held fist. The fact you own a cam speaks volumes about you. Ever see Falling Down (90’s movie)? You are the military surpless sick fuck.

2
Penuruloki 2 points ago +2 / -0

Actually, the extermination camps of Operation Reinhard used CO/CO2 from engine exhaust for killing. They get less attention than Auschwitz because they were much smaller operations that operated for a much shorter time and were closed and covered up before Allied troops moved in, but those were the dedicated killing camps where they went for pure numbers. Auschwitz (where Zyklon B/Hydrogen Cyanide gas was used) was a larger hybrid operation covering multiple sections that morphed over time and had a much more complicated history.

Zyklon B was widely used as an insecticide (so using it for delousing isn't complete nonsense), but Auschwitz ordered it without the warning odorant and the camp Commandant admitted to gassing groups. He just disputed the number (the 6m cited is based more on statistics); the reality is the higher numbers attributed to the camps likely just hides other atrocities that were undocumented (include those by the regular German Army and our Soviet "Allies" as with the Katyn Massacre).

The reality about the Holocaust is that "it happened; Jews were massacred" and "you are being lied to; they don't want you to know the truth" are not mutually exclusive, and most likely both true.

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree with all of this. Thank you.

-4
NvJohansson -4 points ago +7 / -11

Jews mostly as per 3rd reich propaganda, as well as carriers of lice (hence symbolic head shaving and showers) and propagators or rat infestations ( jew ghettos)

0
Titan93 0 points ago +3 / -3

The unstabbed are the new jews.

3
trump1aj 3 points ago +4 / -1

And the old Jews are the ones in charge…

2
OrangeElvis 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yep. Tried to type that but spell correct flubbed it up.

16
559throw 16 points ago +16 / -0

Fucking love it. That's the first thing I saw with that title, too. Literally even Hitler wasn't as bad as you mother fuckers.

What's pathetic is that they will never see it. They're as stupid as Patrick in SpongeBob.
"Aren't you Patrick Star?"
"Yup."
"And this is your ID."
"Yup."
"I found this ID in this wallet, and if that's the case this must be your wallet."
"Makes sense to me."
"Then take it."
"It's not my wallet."

4
acasper 4 points ago +4 / -0

As usual they thought just enough as was required to 'prove' their point and the validity of their dogma.

4
Snoman 4 points ago +4 / -0

No, I believe they are continuing the comparison of us to Hitler and Nazi’s once again

128
deleted 128 points ago +128 / -0
41
deleted 41 points ago +45 / -4
8
AmericanMonarchist 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is the same with monarchism. We were taught in school that our Founding Fathers overthrew the tyrannical King George III so that we could build an egalitarian paradise. In truth, our founders had more in common with the Jacobites 30 years earlier than we do with the modern day Republican party.

Rufus King, one of our Founding Fathers, put it best. "You young men who have been born since the Revolution, look with horror upon the name of a King, and upon all propositions for a strong government. It was not so with us. We were born the subjects of a King, and were accustomed to subscribe ourselves 'His Majesty's most faithful subjects'; and we began the quarrel which ended in the Revolution, not against the King, but against his parliament."

4
UpTrump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bring back King Trump

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
MatthiasBlack 2 points ago +3 / -1

I duly hope and pray for an American monarchy in my lifetime to put an end to this oligarchical nonsense. I would rather one man who sees the country as his family business at worst, a gift from God at best, run this country with meaningful and tangible long term goals, who is willing to die for his countrymen, run this country than any group of the snakes and vipers that compose our current "government". Christian Monarchy, not science, is what birthed the West and what made us the most feared and revered force of good in all of world history. It would be a shame to never see what this country and its people are truly capable of, locked behind bureaucrats and powerthirsty psychopaths.

-1
Penuruloki -1 points ago +1 / -2

The UK is still a monarchy. How's that working out for them now? A King is not the answer. Liberty is.

2
MatthiasBlack 2 points ago +2 / -0

That monarchy hasn't been effective since the Industrial Revolution. One example of a now failing monarchy does not make a strong argument. Europe was ruled by monarchies and became the heir of the world through it. Want a more modern example? Haile Selassie nearly totally turned around Ethiopia from a starving shithole into a real modern country, but was thwarted by Islamists and communists. The modern British monarchy is a joke to use as an example of a functional political monarchy. You're not arguing in good faith if you use it as such.

Parliament has been running the show for forever. The politicians are the problem, not the monarchy. Always has been. If you were well-versed in the history of the Founding Fathers like John Adams, you would know that much of their complaints of the Crown was that King George was not doing enough to stop Parliament from levying the taxes and ruining their livelihood. The American Revolutionaries sought help from King Louis of France, and many of them were somewhat Francophiles like Franklin and Jefferson. It was somewhat ironic that their admiration of France would then trigger its own ruinous revolution that would bring about the end of the French Monarchy that they admired.

You talk of one example of a modern, failing monarchy, yet I notice you're entirely ignorant of every other monarchy, the vast majority of which have been widely successful, stable, and popular among the nation's people. Monarchy is the single best way to ENSURE liberty. It ENABLES local decentralization, and wrangles in the psychopathic oligarchs that would otherwise sell out the country to other interests. This has ALWAYS been the case, you're just not versed on the subject.

1
Penuruloki 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not as ignorant of monarchy as you think I am.

The use of the UK as an example was to prove by example that monarchy is not always the easy solution. Yes, there are examples of monarchies that work out better, but how do we know which one we'd get? Hoping for one "strong man" to come fix all our problems is wishful thinking, and usually leads to disappointment.

Monarchy involves politics just as Democracy does. There are always corrupt underlings and backstabbers to deal with. Take off the rose colored glasses. No system is perfect. You even noted that the complaint was that George III did not do enough to reign in abuses by Parliament, but why do you think that was? Politics, and the maneuvering required to stay in power.

The answer, as I said, is Liberty. Reread the Declaration of Independence, but this time realize that their observations apply to all government, not just democracy. Yes, a monarchy that has the consent of the governed and operates to protect the rights of its people will be popular, while a democracy that oppresses its people and tramples their right will be unpopular (and eventually fail). The answer lies not in the form of the government, but its purpose and operation. Democracy does not promise liberty, as people assume it does, but monarchy neither promises protection from corrupt politicians, as you seem to suggest.

3
krzyzowiec 3 points ago +3 / -0

He also invaded Poland and murdered many Poles.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
krzyzowiec 1 point ago +1 / -0

Before.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
-2
jomten -2 points ago +4 / -6

Imo usury isnt as bad a thing as people make it out to be.

If you loan people money for free its taking a huge risk with no upside. And people need access to loans to be able to take risks making businesses.

Taking interest from someone forever is bad though, so loans should also have collateral to prevent that. And predatory lending to people obviously incapable of paying back loans needs to stop, but thats been basically enshrined into law because “muh poor brown people” cant afford houses.

2
MAGAnomics_101 2 points ago +2 / -0

Usury is charging excessively high interest rates and it is bad. Outlawing usury doesn't outlaw charging proper interest rates.

-7
Keks_Revenge -7 points ago +7 / -14

Dipshit, he also committed mass genocide, initiated WW2 and destroyed his entire country. That’s the important bit to take home, you understand dipshit? Therefore, the fact that he might have also done some good stuff becomes almost irrelevant to anyone who isn’t a dipshit. Non-dipshits understand that you can do some good things without having to be a genocidal maniac. Dipshits on the left say dipshit things like “Mao might have murdered millions of innocent people but he lifted his people out of poverty and illiteracy”. What you are doing is the exact same level of retardation.

14
deleted 14 points ago +15 / -1
7
user2827 7 points ago +8 / -1

Funny how the same group will mention media lies going back longer than we know, BUT 1939-1945 is all impeccable record keeping.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
LarryBugman 1 point ago +1 / -0

TOPKEK

3
trump1aj 3 points ago +3 / -0

Jew makin me laugh

-1
user2827 -1 points ago +1 / -2

I made the point, I did not expect anyone to get so thoroughly triggered like this.

Reddit is ---> over there, you will probably be much comfier with those who share your sensibilities.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think that was sarcasm.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +3 / -2

What parts are false? That WW2 didn’t happen? That Nazi Germany didn’t strongarm their way to power and kick off the biggest war in history? That they didn’t imprison and massacre millions of their own citizens as well as those of neighboring countries?

3
user2827 3 points ago +3 / -0

Look at the premise made: That our history has been thoroughly manipulated, but people believe 1939-1945 to be impeccable records. (dripping with sarcasm)

That does not imply that I have some secret history book.

The best recommendation I could make (if you really want to know and aren't engaged in reddit-tier shilling) is to find history books published in the 1950's, 60's 70's, etc and see how the history has shifted over that period. Then you could tell us about it.

3
BeefyBelisarius 3 points ago +3 / -0

kick off the biggest war in history?

How come only one member of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact gets all the blame for the war they started together?

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

ALL the blame? That's hilarious. After WWII, we entered into a 40+ year war with the OTHER member of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact.

0
Vink 0 points ago +2 / -2

That they didn’t imprison and massacre millions of their own citizens as well as those of neighboring countries?

That part.

0
Keks_Revenge 0 points ago +2 / -2

LOL this thread really brought out the Nazi lovers. Always makes me laugh how you geniuses try to assert two contradicting positions at the same time;

  1. the Jews had it coming to them and Hitler was therefore a hero for genociding them.
  2. Hitler didn’t carry out a holocaust and it’s all lies made up by his enemies.

Which one is it you dumbfucks? You can’t have both. Remember, if you’re not brave enough to admit to believing in the 1st one when you’re being anonymous on the internet, on a site you know you won’t be banned from, then you’ll never be taken seriously in the real world either. So which one is it? At least try to have the courage of your convictions. It’s the cowardice that is soooo fucking boring for us real men to have to wade through.

1
Filo76 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are like cockroaches huddled together in darkness. Glowies gonna glowie I guess.

0
Vink 0 points ago +2 / -2

Imagine still believing the history taught to you by globohomo elites.

75
deleted 75 points ago +76 / -1
72
projectfreedom 72 points ago +76 / -4

Fascism is only another type of socialism. I wish people would understand this. Any form of government that opposes private property and favors public or government ownership and control is socialism. It was only called facism because Mussolini needed to rebrand it to make more digestible for Italians and he wanted to name his own political system but socialism was already taken.

Junk food is still junk food whether it's from McD or Taco Bell.

34
Friendly_B 34 points ago +35 / -1

I think the core difference is that Fascism allows the private ownership of the means of production, only it is under the authoritarian control of the state. So, the owners have little to no say.

So I see Fascism as a sister to Socialism and Communism, all under the same umbrella of Marxism.

Never let them forget that Giovanni Gentile created Fascism intentionally to improve on Marxism, which he was a student of.

44
finalstraw 44 points ago +46 / -2

communism: state owns everything
fascism: state owns companies that own everything

btw, fascism comes from fascio which means a bundle of sticks. fascism symbol is literally a bundle of sticks. what was the english word for a bundle of sticks again? lmao.

14
TommyJarvis 14 points ago +14 / -0

You just blew my MIIIIIIND

10
Desert_Covfefe 10 points ago +11 / -1

Fagism. Sounds legit. Explains a lot.

6
Lord_Karius 6 points ago +6 / -0

Are we at the point where companies own the state?

4
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most of these large multinationals certainly have more power than most states and Klaus Schwab talks about "capturing democracies" right on his Wikipedia bio so I would say yes.

2
DeplorableGerman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Uhhh, what do you think Lobbies are, buddy... Yes, we are at that exact point. And have been at that point for a long time now.

1
Lord_Karius 1 point ago +1 / -0

More rhetorical than actual question, but thanks for the input, buddy.

2
fac1 2 points ago +2 / -0

what was the english word for a bundle of sticks again?

Cigarette.

0
trump1aj 0 points ago +1 / -1

The faggots are at it again!!

20
NeoDragoon 20 points ago +20 / -0

Fascism, you may own the company and factory, but if you fail to meet the demands of the State it will be taken from you by the State.

15
Chad_Dudebroski 15 points ago +15 / -0

Isn't that basically china's policy

5
motm2012 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yea I would say China is more fascist than communist at this point.

7
Friendly_B 7 points ago +7 / -0

Right, I agree.

10
projectfreedom 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yes, you are correct but does not authoritarian control simply turn the private owner into an official of the state?

Also my understanding of history is that Marxism, fascism and communism fall under the umbrella of socialism. Socialism having existed for hundreds of years before Marx was born. Originally, socialism and communism were used as synonyms with no real distinction. I believe Marx began differentiating them only in later translations (French?) Das Kapital.

7
Friendly_B 7 points ago +7 / -0
  • Also my understanding of history is that Marxism, fascism and communism fall under the umbrella of socialism. Socialism having existed for hundreds of years before Marx was born.

I understand that it existed in various forms before. What it really boils down to is half of the hunters who are physically capable of going after the mammoth with their fellow hunters choosing to sit under a tree instead, then demanding half the meat afterwards. Humans have always tried to get away with this shit.

However when it comes to the specifics of those forms of it, during the time period of Marx and his writing, I really don't know. You're probably right. I've viewed all these forms as derivative of Marxism because of the incredible power he had as an influencer. He seems like the originator in modern history even if he was just repackaging the same old shit again. You've given me something to think about.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
Friendly_B 6 points ago +6 / -0
  • does not authoritarian control simply turn the private owner into an official of the state?

Yes. Or a subordinate. The profit factor is the only distinction although now that I think about it their taxes were historically probably ridiculous. Actually I'd like to know more about the tax rates in WWII Germany and Italy.

2
R-A-T-S- 2 points ago +2 / -0

Really the core difference is how they collapse

Fascism - Explodes outwardly

Communism - Implodes inwardly

If a person was to die from a drug overdose in their house, not much of any one really cares. However if their house explodes because they were making meth, suddenly people care.

5
IcyHue 5 points ago +6 / -1

people conveniently ignore the part "socialism" in "national socialism" and I don't know why. When Hitler became a thing in the 20s his followers were just socialists with an extra step.

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
4
ADAM_SCHITT 4 points ago +4 / -0

When did fascists ever break up a public monopoly and allow them to go private?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
DeplorableGerman 1 point ago +2 / -1

Sorry to burst your bubble but the only reason "Fascists" "opposed" Communists was because the Left always without a fault eats its own. Don't conflate in-fighting with sincere opposition. And if you think that what Hitler, Franco and Mussolini did was "good"...Well. Then i'd have nothing else to say to you, i don't entertain the notions of Communists OR Nazis.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
RStroud 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fascism is so hard define because it had no hard and fast ideological rules and was essentially extreme nationalism (or hyper-partisanism) in practice. Anything that served the nation or party could be brought under the banner of fascism. The adoption of militarism and a military command structure is probably the second biggest feature.

If your national leader always wears a uniform (military, party, national outfit) and mostly talks about the needs of the state, party, or revolution you probably have fascism.

3
FloppyDisks 3 points ago +6 / -3

So why are the Antifa flags exact duplicates of the nazi anti fascist flag?

12
projectfreedom 12 points ago +12 / -0

Antifa is brain dead? People will fight to oppose someone else's tyranny and impose their own. The US was the only attempt to create a nation free from tyranny.

1
talltellmanson 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or collectivism

5
DuzzentMatta 5 points ago +5 / -0

It because many -isms are all in the same class of shit we don't want. Fascism, Communism, Socialism, might be different -isms, but they are all parts to a greater machine of evil if any of the 3 -isms are allowed to progress.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
-3
DeplorableGerman -3 points ago +1 / -4

Meanwhile over at the kiddie pool that is ConsumeProduct ... Why exactly this site is granting refuge to literal Neo-Nazis will forever remain a mystery to me.

58
deleted 58 points ago +60 / -2
47
FetAnka 47 points ago +47 / -0

They probably fear that people will start talking about Stalin, Mao, Castro or any other communist dictator if they stop talking about Hitler. Which wouldn't look good for the parties who identify themselves as left wing.

11
hajpaj45 11 points ago +11 / -0

Do you think leftists actually admire the commies you mention? It seems like they do. I know some far left forums on Reddit unironically defend Stalin and say life in the Soviet Union was peachy.

12
FetAnka 12 points ago +12 / -0

Definitely, and that's mostly because they don't know about the bad things. The iron curtain kept most negative information hidden while only the propaganda where allowed through.

23
NeoDragoon 23 points ago +23 / -0

Stalin, Mao, and Temujin have entered the chat

11
Inquisitor_Corvus 11 points ago +11 / -0

Pol pot demands attention.

16
magnokor 16 points ago +16 / -0

He didn't even have the highest kill count in history.

Give Bill and Hillary another decade, they might get there. They are certainly trying.

Mao is winning at the moment. 100million or so.

Don't discount Joe Biden. As he was there at the beginning, he gets his name for the 60million American babies who were killed. He is crazy, would not be a surprise if he droned a bunch of children too.

-7
OrangeElvis -7 points ago +6 / -13

Well, of all the evil leaders, Hitler actually ordered the torture and murder of millions of people - including women and children. The other guys mostly mismanaged their people to death. Fine line in some cases, but that is likely the heart of it - that and some serious propaganda warfare during WW2 really branded H's evil into our psyche.

16
Inquisitor_Corvus 16 points ago +16 / -0

Ever hear of the Killing Fields? Hitler was an amateur at best compared to the rest of them.

-8
OrangeElvis -8 points ago +4 / -12

Not debating numbers. Not debating evilness. Just the effort. The others were more about leaving people to starve, while Hitler literally built assembly lines of death. Not even suggesting which was worse. A quick death is certainly better than succumbing to the elements slowly as you watch you loved ones suffer and die alongside you...

But Hitler was purposeful and intent on extermination and went about it in a high effort (but efficient) way.

15
Inquisitor_Corvus 15 points ago +15 / -0

I reiterate my response. Has history died?

-4
OrangeElvis -4 points ago +3 / -7

When the "history" you quote is literally a work of fiction, maybe so.

The Killing Fields https://g.co/kgs/7C1rJL

3
anishr 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hahahaha what? You say all these fancy things and you’re incapable of finding out what “Killing Fields” refers to? Good lord are you retarded? You have to be to be this self unaware.

9
talltellmanson 9 points ago +9 / -0

Gulag archipelago

Read it now before you speak again on this subject.

Youve allowed communist propaganda into your head which makes 20th century commies seem "not as bad as Hitler" which is just beyond insanity.

All forms of collectivism end in intentional genocide.

-2
OrangeElvis -2 points ago +1 / -3

That escalated quickly, lol. I am familiar with the story and it's warnings/regrets. What in the world led you to believe I do not think communism/facism are not the same thing - power over the people by a select few?

Grab a cup of coffee or switch to decaf. You will not meet another person more vehemently opposed to commies and their ilk. I was making a commentary on the specific evil intent by Hitler as opposed to the general evil disdain and indifference of lost life by some of the largest mass murderers like Stalin.

4
TigersWay 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you think Stalin was just a bumbler with good intentions, you aren’t actually vehemently opposed to commies.

8
talltellmanson 8 points ago +8 / -0

Lol might be the dumbest comment to date.

They ALL ordered the genocide and killing of millions. The communists also mismanaged a few extra millions of people to starvation and death.

5
TigersWay 5 points ago +5 / -0

You need to learn more about how Lenin treated disarmed prisoners in the Russian Revolution. I’ll give you a hint: if Commies offer you the chance to surrender, don’t take it, unless you really like metal smelters.

1
Vink 1 point ago +2 / -1

Well, of all the evil leaders, Hitler actually ordered the torture and murder of millions of people

...according to movies written by Jewish communists. Weird how Churchill never mentioned the Holocaust and the 6 gorillion killed in his war memoirs. Seems like a pretty big omission.

0
OrangeElvis 0 points ago +1 / -1

a lot of reasons for that, potentially. Maybe he ignored the reports and wanted to stay away from the subject because it would reflect poorly on him. In any case, do not let me interrupt your hate fest. No matter what SOME Jews have done, they are forever God's chosen people. Fuck with them at your own peril.

2
Vink 2 points ago +2 / -0

"God's chosen people."

and the rest of us are just cattle.

0
OrangeElvis 0 points ago +1 / -1

You have a lot to learn, friend. Might I recommend the Book of Romans?

6
Bel-6863 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes it is interesting. Probably the ppl who he dupped. Seems Hawhite, Nationalists who "Believe" in god, are all the craze these days. 🤔

5
Friendly_B 5 points ago +5 / -0

Our fathers and grandfather didn't go to war in an uphill battle to fight Mao. That's the major historical difference.

Agreed that Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot and the rest should be held as equally reviled.

41
Rydanovich 41 points ago +42 / -1

Because, you know, Hitler is the ultimate measuring stick for fascism.

16
TheWinningNeverStops 16 points ago +17 / -1

Funny because there are worse cases than him...

26
Chad_Dudebroski 26 points ago +27 / -1

Mao makes Hitler look like Jim jones

6
Tramsec 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yeah, but, like, he wasn't white.

2
Julius_Severus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Friendly reminder that Jim Jones was a communist obsessed with ending racism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peoples_Temple

40
Martel_West 40 points ago +40 / -0

Hitler was also a pioneer of animal protection laws; does Jacobin also believe that animal abuse is ethical?

Hitler was a vegetarian; does Jacobin think vegetables are fascist?

Hitler started the world's first anti-smoking campaign; does Jacobin think everyone should start smoking for freedom?

Dumb bastards.

3
TigersWay 3 points ago +3 / -0

And they’d block us and call us trolls if we asked them. The Internet age is too good for internal consistency…

25
ripley88 25 points ago +25 / -0

Jesus Tap-Dancing Christ...

Leftists perennially get bogged down in some superficial bullshit and think it's an argument.

These people have no idea what a principle even is.

14
Inquisitor_Corvus 14 points ago +14 / -0

To be fair, when you’ve never had any…

5
virgule 5 points ago +5 / -0

The only principle leftist recognize is that which help further The Cause(tm).

20
roflcopt0rz_returns 20 points ago +20 / -0

I remember many years ago, where whenever there was an internet argument, the first person to bring up Hitler instantly lost the argument.

Now, the left unironically thinks that whoever brings up hitler first wins.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
20
muppeton 20 points ago +21 / -1

Next week they'll have to say that the holocaust wasn't completely horrific in order to defend the coof camps.

10
TheWinningNeverStops 10 points ago +10 / -0

They must send out the NPC software update first.

4
hajpaj45 4 points ago +4 / -0

AKA next CNN headline.

16
FetAnka 16 points ago +17 / -1

Right, the left are now arguing that Nazigermany did nothing wrong. Because it was only the Jews (and gypsies, mentally disabled, prisoners of war etc.. which we're not allowed to talk about) they forced experimental medicine on.

15
loverat 15 points ago +15 / -0

They are literally praising Hitler.

2
Vink 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based

14
Not_your_King 14 points ago +14 / -0

You know what this is for. It's for the brain dead cultist to be updated with their latest patch. It must be nice to know that critical thinking is considered evil "white supremacy" in their cult so the sheep can just be told what to think and they'll go along with it. Just throw some cult whistles in there "Hitler," "fascism" "Rieche" there we go. A hot bowl of propaganda slop for the brain dead sheep to repeat ad nauseam.

3
Inquisitor_Corvus 3 points ago +4 / -1

Hitler is good, Hitler is your pal… Yep.

13
FloppyDisks 13 points ago +13 / -0

If this made a sticky on this forum I am truly in a simulation. Now do Animal rights for Peta! He also pioneered that.

13
HK417 13 points ago +14 / -1

Hitler's regime created all kinds of healthcare benchmarks like banning pregnant women from consuming alcohol and cigarettes probably should be a law.

Also Hitler was vilified with propaganda from the same media that constantly lies to us right now. This is not a new problem they've always lied to us and my skepticism for anything they say transcends time. why would you trust anything they have to say about Hitler it's the same lies in games

9
Phillyberto 9 points ago +9 / -0

This is fucking hilarious.

9
StoneColdSteveAutism 9 points ago +9 / -0

Lol

8
TheJimmReaper 8 points ago +9 / -1

Yep the Authoritarian Fascist Nazi regime was famous for it's medical freedoms!!!

These fucking lefties are something else man

8
Rubicante 8 points ago +8 / -0

Assuming we're able to bring this tyranny to an end, which is a grand assumption in itself, it is going to take decades to undo the damage these evil creatures have wrought. We may have lost an entire generation to this madness. Maybe two.

7
beev_bove_biv 7 points ago +7 / -0

Things are really bad when your moral compass is based on things Hitler didn't do.

4
TigersWay 4 points ago +4 / -0

So that’s why they don’t like building roads!

7
Winner45 7 points ago +7 / -0

Relaxed vaccine mandates....increased train ride and shower mandates.

When you’re fucking genociding the people you say are unclean and the cause of disease, I think it’s understandable to relax vaccine mandates to convince your citizens that your authoritarian plan is working.

7
forth2win 7 points ago +7 / -0

They try so hard to make their case but ultimately look like morons.

7
conservativecookie 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hitler also loved dogs, like 99.9% of humans.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
6
TrumpWin 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is doublespeak. See 1984.

5
Lorla 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not the greatest argument.

5
2020_Vision 5 points ago +5 / -0

Now they need to talk about typhoid

5
NvJohansson 5 points ago +5 / -0

How, in 2021, can you still call yourself a liberal when you want your government to control every aspect of your life like it's 1984.

They went from "fuck you l won't do what you tell me" to rule me harder daddy.

5
sustainable_saltmine 5 points ago +5 / -0

Liberal used to mean "liberty", freedom to do what you want and have government stay put of your way. Now it means "liberal with the use of government to control everyone"

1
TigersWay 1 point ago +1 / -0

It still means freedom — sexual freedom. If they lived under the most controlling tyranny possible, but they had free abortion, free birth control, free sex-change surgeries, and freedom from hearing anything other than enthusiastic approval, they’d unironically think that they and only they were free.

3
talltellmanson 3 points ago +3 / -0

Because they just hated the government when they weren't in control.

Now that they have control of all major institutions, they LOVE centralization, authoritarianism and power.

5
comakevin76 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, and I am Elvis.

4
ExileOnRedditStreet 4 points ago +4 / -0

To the top of /r/politics!!!

4
Keiichi81 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Nuh uh! We aren't Nazis, because Hitler was less fascist than we are!"

Great argument.

Also, the fucking irony of the idiot in the Blue Lives Matter hoodie protesting vaccine mandates that will inevitably be enforced by police...

4
Hunter_loves_2_feet 4 points ago +4 / -0

I can play this game. Hitler was a socialist, a failed art student and a vegetarian who’s birthday was on 4/20.

4
user365927285937 4 points ago +4 / -0

He also relaxed gun control laws

4
PeruvianNeckTie 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know who else breathed oxygen? HITLER. Yep blew your mind there.

4
slowmotrin 4 points ago +4 / -0

From Jacobin magazine, lmao.

4
OGTD1 4 points ago +4 / -0

🤡🌎

4
wethepepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

The left was so desperate to find nazis…. They became the modern day nazis.

Slow honk.

4
Inquisitor_Corvus 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not became. Normalized.

4
UltraFrogMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

I refuse to believe most people dont see through this kinda shit

3
Hunter_loves_2_feet 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fascism was Mussolini’s thing. Hitler was the leader of the socialist party. There’s nothing creeping about this.

3
GlitchyMcGlitchface 3 points ago +3 / -0

Hitler was also the first to implement anti smoking laws

3
TheWinningNeverStops 3 points ago +3 / -0

Top kek!

3
Vlad_The_Impaler 3 points ago +4 / -1

Actually, the Holocaust began by Hitler falsely accusing Jews of spreading Typhus.

demoKKKrats falsely accusing you of spreading a disease you don't have is indeed nazism.

It's also bearing false witness. A sin.

3
DaemonKrog 3 points ago +3 / -0

So they're saying Nazi's were literally better than Democrats?

3
bfafpo 3 points ago +3 / -0

You know who else supported eugenics to reduce the load on the government? Hitler, that's who.

Oh, and the United States. https://www.nature.com/scitable/forums/genetics-generation/america-s-hidden-history-the-eugenics-movement-123919444/

And the elites never stopped. The very people they're trying to get rid of are their army and enforcers.

3
Druid_Con 3 points ago +3 / -0

'Creeping fascism is not a sign of creeping fascism because it's democratic socialism"

3
24601 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typical False Equivalence ...

Hitler was a Fascist, but is not the definition of Fascism. Every Fascist has his or her (not they) method to Authoritarian control over a given populace.

2
Beer-_-Belly 2 points ago +2 / -0

This means that democrats are starting to wake up, and they are working to stop the awakening.

2
MrQuacker2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the commies tried forcing death shots back then as well, got it lol. Thanks mustache man!!

2
Deaditewater 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Nazis didn't actually experiment on humans" a defense of Joe Biden... I guess?

2
richIsBored 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hitler was just enforcing his oven mandate.