3675
Comments (297)
sorted by:
286
Supernova 286 points ago +290 / -4

Let it burn.

106
learntocode 106 points ago +108 / -2

There is a coalition of employees fighting these mandates:

https://freedomtochoosela.com/

-27
free-will-of-choice -27 points ago +12 / -39

freedom to choose

Meanwhile in reality...choice represents reaction to balance; balance is defined as momentum (form) of motion (flow), and we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death); which is why one has "free" will of choice within the "dom"-inace of balance aka free-dom.

What are the choices for temporary form within ongoing flow? Need (adaptation as choice to balance) or want (ignorance thereof for suggested choices by others). And now what does a mandate represent (besides interlude to sodomy)? MAN'DATE, noun [Latin mando, to command.] aka a suggestion by the choice of others towards ones free will of choice aka a temptation to ignore need (sustenance of life) for want (temptation luring towards death).

Now the final question...does choice in response to balance represent a conflict with the suggested choices by others; or do the suggestions of others represent ones internal struggle to resist the temptation to ignore to respond to balance?

16
covok48 16 points ago +16 / -0

What is this?

25
Hades440 25 points ago +25 / -0

A PSA about overuse of drugs.

11
Jack_NC 11 points ago +11 / -0

this is your brain.

"let it burn"

this is your brain overdosing on liberal education:

"balance is defined as momentum (form) of motion (flow), and we represent form (life) within flow (inception towards death..."

any questions?

6
el_gato_pepe 6 points ago +6 / -0

Forum sliding?

2
RoscoePColtraine 2 points ago +2 / -0

a bot

-3
free-will-of-choice -3 points ago +5 / -8

Information (want) or inspiration (need) aka a balance for your choice to respond to.

9
BaldyGull 9 points ago +9 / -0

Even Raffiki the baboon from lion king is MAGA!

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

Username checks out.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

Notice how free will of choice tempts the domesticated conformity (through suggestion) of others to leash out...

6
yeldarb1983 6 points ago +6 / -0

...I feel like the next sentence is going to be something about timecubes... x.X;;

2
free-will-of-choice 2 points ago +2 / -0

time-cube

rummaging through some inspiration...alright; so "time" represents the measurement of ongoing movement (tick; tick; tick); which the parasites invert our comprehension of by suggesting the affixed states of past; present and future aka ignorance of being within momentum (balance) and thereby ignorance of responding by free will of choice to balance in motion. As for the so called cube..."six sides constitutes a sextet; not a Cube (four sides + top & bottom); also to perceive the sextet implies being within it aka evaluation by choice of dimension perceived.

Bonus timecube quotes: "Word is a fictitious Trojan Horse and the most efficient form of human enslavement ever concocted...Word has no inherent value, as it was invented as a counterfeit and fictitious value to represent natural values in commerce".

0
yeldarb1983 0 points ago +0 / -0

...the fact that you rolled with it earned you an upvote, lmao.

0
free-will-of-choice 0 points ago +1 / -1

I adapt to whatever inspires; like pointing out that choice responding to balance represents being evaluation within value aka the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs choice to evaluate it...so what can the highest value "earn"?

-1
InterestingThings -1 points ago +7 / -8

I am not sure if people are downvoting because they understand this, and therefore genuinely disagree with it, and I’m just too dull to understand this, or if people are downvoting because they don’t understand it period.

I want to upvote, but I don’t understand it, so I don’t know what I’m upvoting. Screw it. I’ll upvote. It’s autistic at least.

8
TheUsurper 8 points ago +8 / -0

I would say it is getting downvoted due to the pseudo intellectual pretentiousness of it. But that's just an educated (not as much as the author) guess.

4
Antisocialdilemma 4 points ago +4 / -0

Agreed. Read the first line. . Goes off the rails there and then goes down into a spiral of pseudo intellectual zen bullshit hoping to confuse. Leftists in college memorize this bs and it makes them feel intellectually superior. That's why they get angry when confronted with concrete questions of morality or a real life question and rage about it or shut down debate. Most often choice or choosing is not a response to balance. In fact this case is about reacting to an unfair(unbalanced) decree of coercive mandates. It is judging between options and making an informed decision. Whether it's the wrong or right one isn't the issue. The issue is freedom to choose vs forced compliance, not balance. Sounds like a communist not ready to accept that he is a communist or a clever one shilling.

1
ParadigmShift2070 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol don't bother trying to dissect/argue what that autist said, he just spams his bullshits on all the highly active posts that showed up on the front page, if you answer him directly, he'll post more annoying dictionary definition spams of your words instead of conversing like a normal person.

2
unicornpoop 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's an annoy-bot.

1
Antisocialdilemma 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah I can see that. I like to try to break down the babbling for others sometimes so they don't waste their brain cells on it.

-1
free-will-of-choice -1 points ago +1 / -2

I am not sure if people are downvoting because they understand this, and therefore genuinely disagree with it, and I’m just too dull to understand this, or if people are downvoting because they don’t understand it period.

Agreement versus Disagreement represents a) the conflict of reason (true vs false) and b) implies a conflict in-between choices consenting to each other.

Choice represents a response to balance; while the suggested choices of others represents the temptation to ignore (want) responding to balance (need). When we reason among ourselves about the true or false of suggestions; then that represents a conflict between our choice of want vs not want...both in ignorance of need. This consent to ignore need for want is what allows the few to control the many by suggestion.

The few use suggestion (-isms) to divide (reason) the many, and to maintain the dividing conflicts of reason (true vs false) they then suggest contradictions to both sides.

Any contradiction perceived to consented to true of false beliefs; will tempt one to defend beliefs; hence perpetuating the conflict of reason. Whatever I write will be perceived by those within reason as unreasonable.

I don’t understand it

Nature offers all meaning to our perception; others within nature use words to suggest substitute meaning; which deceives each other to ignore nature as the sole source of everything. Nature moves all within (from inception towards death); which our senses perceive as inspiration to react to by free will of choice...this is called adaptation; yet choice responding to balance within movement implies two choices...need (self sustenance) and want (ignorance of need).

The parasitic few suggest want to trick the many into ignoring need; which allows the few to control the ignorant many.

56
daiyuesen 56 points ago +57 / -1

Normally one shouldn't encourage arson, but it could sure solve a lot of problems in this case...

10
Dirk_Diggler 10 points ago +10 / -0

It is October. Hope they don’t celebrate their first Devil’s Night.

9
MagaDevildog2 9 points ago +9 / -0

would be ashame if a few pedowood "Elites" house were to be set a blaze.

3
HeavyMetalPatriot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Celebrities have private firefighters. It's a thing in LA.

3
yeldarb1983 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why bother? the state's own mismanagement of wild areas will do the damage on its own...

36
SaltyKrakenBalls 36 points ago +37 / -1

The smell of homeless shit will carry to the east coast...

27
Apersonofinterest 27 points ago +27 / -0

It’s mainly the homeless starting fires in LA. No one cared when they did it in the ghetto but they are increasingly pitching their tents below multi-million dollar mansions.

They still don’t care but they are disposing of those tent cities lickity split.

20
ShittersFull 20 points ago +20 / -0

"multi million dollar mansions" you mean 1500 Sq ft homes that sell for over a mill bc it's commie California?

1
midgetpornrocks 1 point ago +1 / -0

1300 sq ft.

1
deplorable-d00d 1 point ago +1 / -0

Condo

With HOA

8
rossiFan 8 points ago +8 / -0

The lawns in Pacific Palisades are very nice and lush. They can get over the fences, easily. That would be a prime place for the homeless to go.

2
HeavyMetalPatriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Funnily enough, the big arson wildfires in CA have been from university professors and PhD students. So this news is awesome for the Extinction Rebellion crowd of Greta worshippers.

11
Annpi 11 points ago +15 / -4

They aren't homeless, they are druggies that live on the street

6
QLARP 6 points ago +8 / -2

So the war on drugs was a bad idea.

3
ControlledCuck 3 points ago +6 / -3

I mean, yeah. One of the reasons why so many drug addicts are so poor and end up destroying their lives is because dope is very expensive when it's made illegal and has to be sold on the black market. If drugs were legal they wouldn't be so expensive or as dangerous and you would then have many functional drug addicts just like there are so many functional alcoholics who could work their jobs, have family and decent economy and life situation overall. Prohibition was always unconstitutional and it causes way more damage and crime down the road than if there was no prohibition.

It's weird how people can't draw the parallels today with when alcohol was illegal during the Prohibition Era which just caused crime rates to explode. Most gangs today make most of their money smuggling and selling dope.

3
RStroud 3 points ago +3 / -0

Junkies typically have way more going against them than the drug addiction, cost, and criminal record. Dual diagnosis is almost universal. They also tend to do stupid shit that gets the cops involved, regardless of the legality of the substances involved. I think you'd have fewer social issues, and cops wouldn't have an excuse to search every vehicle, but I don't think a large portion of addicts are going to become truly functional.

-1
RonDeSantisSAVIOUR -1 points ago +1 / -2

Have u ever done drugs? I dont think you can speak on that unless you have plenty of personal experience. And I don't mean doing wippits with ur buddies in high school. I was doin a lot of drugs for many years yes i've seen a lot of high functioning addicts and also a lot of dope addicts, it goes from person to person.

1
TrappedRed_in_blue 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd be interested in knowing whether the high functioning addicts were the exception or the norm.

1
ShittersFull 1 point ago +2 / -1

Funny way of saying bought and paid for by the feds

4
Abovethefray 4 points ago +4 / -0

Bums. New terminology be damned.

2
Annpi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Much better

4
SharonaZamboni 4 points ago +4 / -0

They are streetsleepers. Drug addicts and insane people. Mental hospitals should not have been closed down.

4
Annpi 4 points ago +4 / -0

If mental hospitals where still open, libtard cities would be far less populated

0
Hades440 0 points ago +1 / -1

The street is not a home. So either they are homeless, or you're telling me they have homes but they prefer living on the street.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Hades440 1 point ago +1 / -0

They aren't homeless

That wasn't you? It has your name on it.

6
Skabliggum2 6 points ago +6 / -0

Mine was "Burn, baby, burn"

6
TrumpVoter1 6 points ago +6 / -0

"disco inferno"

123
And_Im_Kenny_Rogers 123 points ago +123 / -0

Then they'll blame the fires on climate change.

78
ComTruiseWasRight 78 points ago +78 / -0

Have we tried vaccinating climate change?

26
Not_The_FBI 26 points ago +26 / -0

This. This right here. You win the internet for the day.

7
Stallionstyle 7 points ago +7 / -0

Vaccinating racism via BLM, if they get paid and get promoted enough.

5
Tokyo20DrinkingGame 5 points ago +5 / -0

Considering the virus and vaccine are both about depopulation, from the aborted fetuses the vaccine was made with to the deaths the vaccine causes in young people and the virus kills off the elderly and obese....yes the goal is less people on earth to combat climate change.

3
Jack_NC 3 points ago +3 / -0

just pass a law; make it illegal. Oh, and a tax. Can't forget the tax because then you can appoint a Tsar, and of course you'll need enforcement and compliance so you just hire a department and...

2
ComTruiseWasRight 2 points ago +3 / -1

N O W !

THAT'S

WHAT

I

CALL

....

J̵̛̛̣̮̞̗́̈̀̄̀͑̑̆̊̈́̽̃̐̌̈́̀͒͒̈́̏̋͒̏̈́̓̽̑̌̀͆̕͝͝ ̸̛̛̤͉͉̟͖̘̱̰̠̠̮̗̼͕̹͌͌̑̊̂͑̓͂̊̓͌͊̾͆͊̄̈͒́̕Ö̷̡̨̧̢̡̮͖͍̯͚̝̞̞͉͓͉͈̤͚͚̃̅̑̊͆̀͒̋̇̑̊̈́͊̔̅̕͜͝ͅ ̷̢̨̙̗͇̦̟̤̼̝̫͎̱̲̠̖͓̱͓̩̫̣̻̤͉͍͔̪̟̘̟̱̓͋̊̄̂̎͊͠ͅB̴̨̛̜͖̯̞̞̠̱̺̯̻̫̝̎̿̂̐̓͋͐͋̇͒̀͋͗̈́̍̆̓̈́̈́̒̂̚͘͝͝͝͝͝ ̴̧̡̨̢̢̗̖̳̖͓̣͉͚̞͙͙̟̜̼̺͉͎͎̪̲̗̼̬̙̳͕̱̺̱͈̭̈́̇̈̇̾̓̔̈́͒̓͗́͐͘͜͝͠͝͝͠-̴̨̯͈̪͈̮̞͈͙̯̺͚̼̙͙͔͚̬̲̔́̌͛̀͌͗́ ̸̧̢̡͈̠͕̟͙̞͖̜͓͈̗͍̹̣͍̾̋̋̆͗̇̕͜C̶̡̧̡̠̯͓̯̪̭̟͓̝̦͙͕͇̯̰̼̫̺̖̺̝̩̳̮̫͍̜̮̳̳͆͋̎͗͂̋͘͘̚͝͝ ̶͍̂Ř̸̛̖̯̺̦̹́͗̊̅́̈͛͑̉͌̓̇̊͑̓͌̈́̎̕͠͝ ̵̨̧̛̮̟͍̟̳͙͕̭̝̲͎̜̭̺̦͖̹̥̤̖̻̜̤͉͙̞̯̞̪̯̯̬͉̫̜̗̀̎͑̀̔̽̈̿͑̂̑͗̋̀͐̊̑̇̏͗̔̋̉͆́͗̑͘̚̕̚͝͠͝͝E̸̻͚͈͔̰̳̠͎̯̓̓̀̿̌͆̊̉̈́́̒͜ ̸̨̧̢̤̹̖͎̫̪̤̘̺̘̥̞̮̲͓̪͍̳͎͈̲̦̤̪̬̥̭͚̠̥͉̗͚̺͒̅͒͂̊̿̐͑̏̌̿̏̈́̌̊͋̎̚͝͝A̵̮̗͎̞͈͚͍̳̗̣͕̰̰̥̩̥̪̠̬̬̲͙̜̩̯̗̅̑̓̇̕̕͜ ̵̛̣̥̎̈́̽̿̾T̵̛̩̉̀̾̐̽͑̆̐̃̔͌͗͑͗͑̎͆̓̓̋̀̿̕͝͠͝͠͝ ̷̢̡̟̱͕̜̜̟̞̟̱̤̘̥̞̺̭̲̰̙̲̝̙̙̳͕̃̃͑̒̊̿̀͑̄̂̕ͅḮ̸̛̛̛̟̮͈͔͔͍̮͈͉͖̩͍͖̥͇͊̐̎͐̈́̋͂̇̆͗͒̑̓̑͆̾͗̿̐̌̓͗͛̍̓͛̒̓̚͘͜͝͠ ̸̧̛̩̞̩̠͇͈̬̱̳͖̦͔̣͓̭̩͉̖̻̙̰̫̦̮͍̼̭̥̯͇̜͍̰̑͂̀́̽͐̽̆̾͆̐̀̋͒̿̋̾͒͋͌͗̉̋̏̀̓̿̑̚͝͠O̴̡̡͇̯͕̮̙̹̞͖̫͕̬̮̝͎̭̻̫̝̤̤̽̾͛̔̌̈́͗͒̒̾̏̾͋̎̐̉ ̸̨̢͓̯̞̥͙̲̬̠͉̲̟͇̯̻̝̬͚̭͇̞̙̟̖͓̪̮̲̪͔͇̤͇͙͉̟̠̪͌́̍N̴̜̏̏͗̀̽̇͑̈́

12
ProphetOfKek 12 points ago +12 / -0

Climate change is inherently racist.

8
MrDonaldTrump 8 points ago +8 / -0

And systemically rayciss. Climate change is double honk honk rayciss!!!

3
Darkheartisland 3 points ago +4 / -1

women and minorities affected most

4
redgreenyellowblu 4 points ago +4 / -0

We need a non-binary trans climate. Here's why.

2
Kamalas_a_Bitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

You can only say that if you are a non-binary trans gender queer disabled BIPOC with AIDS

4
Riderdie 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone better start gassing up Al Gores jet, he’s gonna need to hit the ground running if he wants to profit off this again.

1
ManyDirt 1 point ago +1 / -0

We're wheels up in 5!

4
Ed_Ward 4 points ago +4 / -0

And then they'll raise everyone's taxes and enforce new regulations to fight it.

3
Nameless_Mofo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Actually they'll blame the fires on the unvaxxed, because why the fuck not?

2
PrezElectHamsandwich 2 points ago +2 / -0

"It's the unvaccinated's fault that we had to fire them because they wouldn't get the vaxx."

100
Gmama2 100 points ago +100 / -0

No but really, 99.99% are vaxxed, Joe said so.

43
TKAdams 43 points ago +43 / -0

I love that he said that after defending the firing of all of the unvaccinated in participating companies.

Yes, Joe. If you fire all of the unvaccinated then the workers who are left are vaccinated.

3
Aquamine-Amarine 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're not good at basic math.

25
deleted 25 points ago +25 / -0
19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
12
ProphetOfKek 12 points ago +12 / -0

Lmao yup. But the hard number will be the same.

1
Snoman 1 point ago +1 / -0

The CNN death clock says only 56 % are vaccinated

61
deekarmy 61 points ago +62 / -1

Fire half, declare total workforce is 100% jabbed.

16
yurimodin 16 points ago +16 / -0

...........

profit???

12
Jestre 12 points ago +12 / -0

Blame the fires on climate change, then profit

3
rossiFan 3 points ago +3 / -0

No... Burn.

53
minotaurbeach 53 points ago +53 / -0

This could be the start of fahrenheit 451?

All the firefighters are replaced with hatians that start fires

46
dahdahdah_dahditdah 46 points ago +46 / -0

We're well past the start. The dystopian novel Fahrenheit 451 was about burning books, i.e. censorship. That is already well underway without many ordinary people's knowledge, because it involves digital censorship and not actually setting stuff on fire. Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, Wikipedia - all of these have been "burning books" like mad, and it's only accelerated since 2016 and especially 2020.

28
whybag 28 points ago +28 / -0

One crucial point about Farenheit 451, the book burnings were demanded by the people.

23
dahdahdah_dahditdah 23 points ago +23 / -0

Like the Facebook whistleblower whose complaint is that the government isn't fascist enough and we need more censorship. Immediately given a giant audience on fake news media, verified on Twitter, welcomed to testify to Congress.

There are some people who can't destroy the country fast enough, and they are true believers. It's our job to counter that and to be the voice that turns the masses away from following them. Dystopian literature is one tool in that fight (Fahrenheit 451, Brave New World, 1984, Harrison Bergeron, MANY others).

So many people are breathtakingly ignorant of history and literature, though, and they frequently read mindless drivel instead of stuff that makes them think.

2
silentsupporter 2 points ago +2 / -0

Like how they all demanded Trump be de-platformed.

3
redgreenyellowblu 3 points ago +3 / -0

Try finding Dave Chappelle's recent trans jokes online. It seems impossible. Just pages and pages of links to articles about what a bad thing he did.

2
Nellie_the_Beaut 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s also fascinating that Fahrenheit 451 has at its center an all encompassing, interactive social media that people watch from their giant living room tv. The “game” that they rush home every night to take part in. And the biggest thrill is to be acknowledged during the game so everyone can see how special you are. How the government is running the social media and using it to spy on everyone for wrongthink.

10
observer12 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's California so they already have the starting fires part figured out this is just the other half of not having people to put them out

11
minotaurbeach 11 points ago +11 / -0

I agree, it is more about stopping the rescues.

When we first locked down out here, several people packed up and went to the mountains.

Antifa, set fires all around them, so the camping families could not escape the fire without assistance. The fire/coast guard was told NOT to rescue them and leave them to die, but they disobeyed orders, and got everyone out with time to spare. 300 people were expected to die so some one can send a message, you should not run from us'.

State government is supervising this: BLM and Antifa Can not go just anywhere in California and it seems limited which places they can go. I think the homeless keep intfering with Antifa/BLM and the homeless here are not like New York homeless.

You have many types of people that are hard to control because they come from different situations, and it is a simplistic assumption they will all hate white people, because many have escaped communism and violence in the middle east to come live here,

3
mitzlplix 3 points ago +3 / -0

slowpoke Rodriguez will take his time putting out the fire 😄

1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or the Truck will be stolen on the way to put out the fire.

-4
Plugthegamey -4 points ago +1 / -5

That book is fake and gay. You don't have to quote a dystopian crap fest to disagree with our current government. God I hated that book they made me read it in school in two different grades. Along with to kill a mockingbird, catcher in the rye. Hemmingway sucks.

1
minotaurbeach 1 point ago +2 / -1

fuck off back to Reddit, leftard

45
learntocode 45 points ago +45 / -0

The City of Los Angeles is currently in a declared emergency over COVID-19.

The criteria to exit the emergency is: normal operation of government can handle the emergency.

If you fire a LOT of firefighters, police, utility workers, maintenance personnel the normal operation of government cannot handle day-to-day operations!

This will make the "emergency" a permanent condition.

This in turn gives current officeholders and appointees tryannical power (emergencies exempt constitutional barriers to government action).

Additionally, reducing such a large percent of public employees the city will shed large amounts of labor-, benefit-, and pension-related costs. Such a reduction in costs will allow the City to borrow excessive amounts from Wall Street bond buyers based on increased "efficiencies". This is classic "fiscal austerity" the IMF and World Bank have used in developing nations to crush civil society and ensure outside wealth extraction continues indefinitely and at the highest magnitude possible.

One of the truly bizarre twists in this COVID insanity is the position union leaders have taken: they are IN FAVOR of mass layoffs! Anyone who says "it is all about the money" needs to think about that. Union leaders are trust falling into LESS dues paying members, LESS political power, and lower quality of life guaranteed for all of Los Angeles. Public employee and nurse unions the last bulwark against corporate domination of all aspects of public and private life.

17
MrWombatt 17 points ago +17 / -0

This whole time, I've been wondering where the unions are. Why aren't they fighting this?

17
Jestre 17 points ago +17 / -0

Because they've been insanely corrupt ever since the mob stopped running them.

8
learntocode 8 points ago +8 / -0

It is insane, like really nuts.

SEIU 1000 did win an exemption (see below).

These are massive layoffs being proposed and these union leaders are sleepwalking!

The city of LA has numerous lawsuits filed against it, with more pending.

Coalitions formed to oppose vax mandates:

https://freedomtochoosela.com/

https://firefightersforfreedom.org/

The utility workers union has filed a labor law complaint regarding the mandate changing terms of employment without negotiating with the union.

LAPD personnel have filed a federal suit: Burcham v City of Los Angeles which is filed as Complaint 21-CV-07296

Theres is also an SEIU 1000 decision that won exemption from these mandates: https://www.seiu1000.org/post/union-wins-discipline-protection-vaccine-verification-battle

2
tiamat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kick backs

11
observer12 11 points ago +11 / -0

The union leaders are all paid off so that's why they're in favor of mass layoffs. Unfortunately for them, these mass layoffs are probably going to lead to mass executions in the future if history is any guide to situations like this. Best of luck to them

2
learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope you are right - because that would make more sense!!

They are literally working to destroy their base of income and power.

2
T_WIN_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

Https://Seiu721.org

Just to name one of them.

Go to NEWS to read all the BS

2
T_WIN_2020 2 points ago +2 / -0

*The County of Los Angeles is currently in a declared emergency over COVID-19.

2
learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

The mandates that will lead to mass layoffs make a LOT of sense now. This is their moonshot to ensure a permanent emergency and turn us into Egypt under Mubarak.

1
rossiFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

LA will be the first place federal "law enforcement" will be established. But that's kinda funny because Shaqueefa and Darron can't possibly do the job.

26
Goldlight 26 points ago +26 / -0

apparently the sheriff won't enforce the mandates though

25
nankingRoastie 25 points ago +25 / -0

you mean the fired department

6
Hippopoonis [S] 6 points ago +6 / -0

Ha! Yes. :)

4
TehAgent 4 points ago +4 / -0

KEK

21
AlphaNathan 21 points ago +21 / -0

I detect the use of an accelerant.

17
NazisWereSocialist 17 points ago +17 / -0

Kek, are they going to have to mobilize the national guard to put out the fires next time riots start?

Firing all these people over the jab is hastening the classic military takeover of everything that comes with every authoritarian takeover except they don’t have the political will for this shit to be successful because they can’t be overt about their intentions.

4
observer12 4 points ago +5 / -1

Let it burn

14
Malmortus 14 points ago +14 / -0

Corporate communism. They are talking about mandating the shot or having to submit to weekly testing at your own expense where I work. Everyone is passing the buck though. Our president says it's HR. HR says it's the CDC. The CDC says it's OSHA. It's one big circle back jerk fest.

5
learntocode 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mass layoffs to ensure a permanent "emergency" and thus justifying permanent suspension of constitutional protections.

14
shrbrn 14 points ago +14 / -0

lol... if this happens I got truckload of popcorn ready--- it be very entertaining.

13
IHeartMyDoggy 13 points ago +14 / -1

If it happens, just bring regular corn and Pop it in all the burning buildings.

13
Baddudecornpop87 13 points ago +13 / -0

They aren't allowed to put out fires any way because the fires are "mostly peaceful"

9
YouNeedVPN 9 points ago +10 / -1

Lol. Couldn't wish it on a better city.

9
rauschman 9 points ago +11 / -2

Let it implode lol

And the ones who stay will be so overworked they may just leave

4
BeekeepingPatriot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ever heard of the Mando van? Or the Mando man?

1
rauschman 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nope. Nothing even similar to it.

Edit: internet search pretty showed me the Mandalorian

9
Timmy100 9 points ago +9 / -0

Los Angeles will become soon a North American version of Favela. Low skilled immigrants from the south will practically ensure that when at the same time most if not all the tech and movie companies will relocate.

8
GenericInsult 8 points ago +9 / -1

Let it burn.

4
nankingRoastie 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one is entitled to a fire department anyway. Its a social benefit paid for by everyone.

They should tell people to be very careful from now on because no ones going to save their homes

1
556x45mm 1 point ago +2 / -1

Wait.... if there is no fire dept, then will my fire insurance on my property get cancelled?

6
dirtymikeandthebois 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'll believe it when I see it. For as much boo hooing we see our first responders (that includes police) get - there is a line, literally, a mile long anytime a department is hiring for 3 positions. So yeah... the un-jabbed might get axed but those dudes also know full well they will be replaced in a heartbeat.

4
observer12 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the past yes, but nowadays? I guess we'll see

3
BigPanda71 3 points ago +3 / -0

It’s pretty easy to get a warm body into a police or fire job, but it takes time and money to train them. Spread those costs out over time with the natural rate of attrition and it’s not such a big deal. But trying to replace half of the fire department overnight would cost a ton of money and may not even be logistically possible due to limited space to train and limited staff to do the training.

1
dirtymikeandthebois 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure - but this isn't like any other trade. These people are damn near promised a pension that allows them to retire at 45 with a lot of money for sitting around in a fire station 75% of the time. Just isn't happening and they know it. That's why their retention is so stupid high.

2
learntocode 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mass layoffs to ensure a permanent "emergency" and thus justifying permanent suspension of constitutional protections.

6
Coprolite 6 points ago +6 / -0

Does the national guard have fire an rescue?

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
5
observer12 5 points ago +5 / -0

Good this is actually really good. If these firefighters have any balls they will start something going similar to what happened in Australia and then others can join and we can finally start to take this fucking country back

5
Farage_massage 5 points ago +8 / -3

CHANGE MY MIND:

ANYONE STILL LIVING IN THESE PLACES DOESNT DESERVE TO WORK.

4
HeadHoncho 4 points ago +5 / -1

CHANGE MY MIND

Easy. It's coming to where you live, if it's not there already.

Easier to help stop the fire from spreading to begin with than put out your own house when it's on fire.

1
RoscoePColtraine 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not everybody is a cowardly crybaby bedwetter fleeing when an area turns to shit. But you're a natural born quitter, we get it.

1
Farage_massage 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, y’all are putting up such a fight in CA - keep it up champ.

0
RoscoePColtraine 0 points ago +1 / -1

More than you are wherever you are, loser.

4
MetallicOpeth 4 points ago +5 / -1

good let it burn

4
BeachPede 4 points ago +5 / -1

Dumb fucks need to pack their shit and leave that shit hole of a state.

-2
MakeFloridaRed -2 points ago +3 / -5

No way! Make the dummies stay for their rewards. They voted for this.

1
A_Russian_Wall 1 point ago +1 / -0

No one voted for this. Dominion + no voter ID allows commies to get installed over and over.

3
TurdFerguson 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they fire all those firefighter they’ll have to pay outa a shit ton of vacation time.

3
Sheeplearentpeople78 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nothing proves like they let CA burn on purpose than this.

3
ubermk3 3 points ago +3 / -0

Then they will have more raging infernos to blame on the climate change hoax.

3
Oktheone 3 points ago +3 / -0

"wE loVe our HEROES!!"

3
FuckReddit4545 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good

3
Jonah_Kyle 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'd be moving to Texas or Florida in a heartbeat...

3
BidensHairyLegs 3 points ago +3 / -0

More blood on Fauci's and Biden's hands.

3
Lurker404 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean they are called the FIRE department. Makes sense if you don't think about it.

3
COLDWARPATRIOT55 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe it will burn down, then they can all move to San Fran psycho

3
BettyBlue76 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yet the police chief is not enforcing the mandate. Strange times.

3
Ultra625 3 points ago +3 / -0

Man, I live in LA and I love my city, but it's turned into SF 2.0. The city consul for my area is tired of the mayor's BS. They put their foot down on the homeless issue and kicked them all out. But the city is turning it up on the mandatory clot shot. I have many family and friends in the LAPD and 30% of the force are refusing the jab. If the city doesn't cave on the mandate, a third of the force is gone and shit will really hit the fan. No cops to stop the dumb BS when jackasses start fires and no one to put it out.

2
RoscoePColtraine 2 points ago +2 / -0

And not enough nurses to treat the burn victims.

3
Ccvarn 3 points ago +3 / -0

Gavin is so smart, can't wait to see that faggot try to blow out house fires.

3
Hades440 3 points ago +3 / -0

And when fires get worse it will be because of climate change.

3
AZfireman 3 points ago +3 / -0

City of Tucson is pulling the same bullshit. It was fine to risk our lives when Covid first appeared, but now that we have all had it and know it is not near as dangerous as we thought, they are trying to force us to get the vaccine. And nobody is asking why. Why are all of these medical professionals with hands on Covid experience declining the shot?

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
3
Bardwitha45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Something in the bible about a third of the world being on fire.

Quite the Revelations.

3
MajJamesMcFarlane 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do it.

Do it, pussies!

3
cpt_majestic2 3 points ago +3 / -0

The roof, The roof...............................

3
Yz450f 3 points ago +3 / -0

Throw some vaccines on California fires. There might be a better chance that the vaccines would do some good.

2
nomoreprinkles 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope they don't set fire to things on their way out.

2
OnlyTrump20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Devil's Night starts early this year!

2
FireannDireach 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that will go well.

2
Throwingway22 2 points ago +2 / -0

Every government employee fired is just a good start--I don't care if they are firefighters or office clerks.

2
IPMang 2 points ago +2 / -0

People burning to death is for their own safety

2
CommieCrats 2 points ago +2 / -0

#INSANITY!

2
PresidentBidet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good, then their diversity hires can start more fires.

2
MLGS 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is what they voted for.