4160
I wonder if there's EVER been a non rigged election? (media.patriots.win) 🛑  Corrupt Commies  🛑
posted ago by Siteless_Vagrant ago by Siteless_Vagrant +4161 / -1
Comments (239)
sorted by:
171
germs 171 points ago +172 / -1

Those in power want to stay in power… and they make sure of it.

100
nozonozo 100 points ago +100 / -0

The 1960 election that Kennedy "won" was rigged.

Just look at the anomalies from Illinois, mainly Chicago.

70
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 70 points ago +71 / -1

I heard a story that all elections are rigged and that they keep secret stashes of votes ready to deploy. Both sides are waiting on the other to put in their final batch of votes so the other can then beat it by a small margin.

This story is one that a Mafia guy talked about from the 60's and 70's

70
TonsOfSalt 70 points ago +70 / -0

That's why they told everyone to prepare for biden to win after election night. Once they knew how many was required, all those "mail in votes" were ready to be counted just right.

52
The_Litehaus_Abides 52 points ago +52 / -0

There was something called The Election Integrity Project that mapped out the steal way in advance. It was out there in the open and there was an article written about it Bongino had on his show.

Can't remember who wrote it, but it talked about the 600 lawyers, rioting at the White House when Trump won and a bunch of other shady shit.

They knew Trump would win in a landslide and they were ready to steal it regardless. And they did.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
8
The_Litehaus_Abides 8 points ago +8 / -0

Well, I was never a believer of "The Plan" because I recognized it as a warmed-over Operation Trust fairly early on.

I did, however, think President Trump must have something in mind to stop the steal because all of this information was out in the open.

It was my understanding that President Trump likes Dan Bongino and listens to his show. He's been Dan's guest 3 times, I think.

It just blew me away when his landslide election victory was stolen from us and there wasn't a damn thing to do to stop it.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
sometimescanbefunny 4 points ago +4 / -0

Most of this site thinks we're still voting our way out of this.

2
Kotaro-Atani 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, Watch and Mark my words, Midterms in 2022, Democrats still in power, then people will bitch and moan, then in 2024 the Presidency will be stolen again. That will be hopefully the Straw that breaks the Camels back.. and People will pick up arms and on TV it will be, "Terrorists/ insurrectionist are shooting and killing Democrats.." trying to spin it like the 'RAT's are the good guys...

31
tehkelso 31 points ago +31 / -0

That shit was painfully obvious.. I don't know how anyone could deny that this happened.

27
CucksForTheDonald 27 points ago +27 / -0

One take I read was that they did it blatantly on purpose, so that conservatives would riot. Then they could have themselves a nice civil war, declare martial law, deploy the military against "domestic terrorists", and so forth.

As it is, all they got was January 6, and womp-womp. So far, at least.

19
bbxx 19 points ago +19 / -0

Their pre written speeches that day didn't match up with what happened. It's the type of speech that I would have expected if many people had died.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Luckily now they die slowly

41
MustangManny 41 points ago +41 / -0

I've always wondered why almost every election comes down to a small margin. Its always something like 51% to 49%

21
Seatacjoe 21 points ago +21 / -0

That is why I live looking at the electoral count for Reagan vs Mondale...it was a nother fuckin ass kicking. Unless they put Mondale and Ferraro in to absolutely tank, who knows?

14
Trumperific 14 points ago +14 / -0

this would certainly explain why neither side wants to do anything about election integrity.

5
Destineed369 5 points ago +5 / -0

Election integrity means thousands would be out of lucrative corrupt gov jobs. Do you want them to go poor? Lol

2
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah I thought that story was kind of absurd till the last year. Makes sense now.

10
lordvon 10 points ago +10 / -0

explains why the margins are always so thin. i mean you would think its a statistical improbability

2
winsome 2 points ago +2 / -0

How did Trump win then?

13
Kholland65 13 points ago +13 / -0

They expected their espionage and spying on trump would taint his his chances. They chose the wrong method of cheating, so they upped the ante in 2020.

7
sigint1984 7 points ago +7 / -0

They started in the 2018 mid terms though. Congressional candidates declared winners only to be overturned later by ballots found in trucks. One lady had already attended freshman orientation.

6
deleted 6 points ago +7 / -1
4
Dogeagle 4 points ago +4 / -0

Also, there might be a way of turning off or blocking the dominion control. This time we just observed?

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

thx

9
CastlesMadeofSand01 9 points ago +9 / -0

They thought Trump was a laughing stock, and figured their total control of media calling him names was enough to scare people into not voting for Trump. After 8 years of Obama, their arrogance was massive at the time.

I also suspect Democrats did cheat in the 2016 elections, but, small time shit compared to what they pulled in 2020. I remember seeing Project Veritas going undercover with Democrat scum operatives like Bob Creamer in the bird dogging video. I remember that guy saying "they've been bussing voters around for 50 years". In places like New Hampshire, I bet anything they did cheat enough for Hillary to win 2016. If you recall, NH was pretty close in 2016...Trump almost took it.

But because the Dems were operating in an echo chamber ("it's her turn!", the nonsense polls, D+20), they didn't cheat enough to outweigh people like us that are fed up of their bullshit, and voted Trump.

After 2016, these scumbags realized they had to destroy social media in order to take out Trump. That plus all the other horseshit with mail-ins landed us where we are now.

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

thx

4
Capitalism_Fuck_Yeah 4 points ago +4 / -0

Simple. He got so many more votes than they were ready to cheat with. They corrected that issue in 2020 but they had to reveal the fraud to do so.

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

thx

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

He got the votes

1
winsome 1 point ago +1 / -0

thx

24
RoyalPython23 24 points ago +24 / -0

Also look at Texas in 1960. One of the reasons Kennedy picked LBJ as VP was to keep Texas democrat. Johnson stole the 1948 Democrat primary runoff for senate which he won by 87 votes. He most likely stole Texas for Kennedy in 1960.

23
pepperonishoes 23 points ago +23 / -0

Where did the extra 200 votes come from? The last 202 names on on the election roll in Box 13 were in a different color ink from the rest of the names, the names were in alphabetical order, and they were all in the same handwriting.

Sounds familiar?

7
gloriouschairmanpao 7 points ago +7 / -0

Johnson was Clinton before Clinton was Clinton

10
Sheprecon31 10 points ago +10 / -0

Correct the mob got him in and took him out in cahoots with deep state OPERATIVES

8
AmericanMan00 8 points ago +8 / -0

Kennedy assassination documents still classified after all these years, why?

5
Thelongrun 5 points ago +5 / -0

C.I.A did it, on behalf of the Power Cabal.

The relevant documents were burnt/shredded weeks after the Big Event.

3
TransamLq4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes, I watched a investigation once that purposed the agent in a chase car behind him delivered the death shot(not this 💉) . They tried to say it was accident but we all know the government has been corrupt since hell, probably early 1900.

3
Thelongrun 3 points ago +4 / -1

JFK's slaughter is such a huge can of worms, and endlessly, morbidly fascinating... I've been studying it for years... there's one thing we know for certain, Lee Harvey Oswald did not fire a shot that day. He was innocent. More than innocent.

He actually attempted to prevent the assassination. It's a long story... a very long story...

2
Vox_Dobad 2 points ago +2 / -0

Point me in a direction, por favor. I studied it for a couple of months for a conspiracies class in college, and I came to the conclusion that Oswald did at least shoot. But anything past that was indeterminate, including whether any of his shots hit JFK.

1
Thelongrun 1 point ago +1 / -0

JFK and The Unspeakable. Why He Died And Why It Matters. By Jame Douglas.

An astonishing book that lays it all out in the most profound, almost spiritual manner.

Astoundingly researched, many first-hand interviews with people who were there... so, so much more. Here's a link to a review of it, from another great mind, Paul Craig Roberts.

You really need to order this book.

Be prepared to be shocked, and to have your world-view altered.

https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/10/31/jfk-unspeakable-died-matters/

1
Thelongrun 1 point ago +1 / -0

Three shooters at least. Oswald wasn't one of them. One behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll. One in the Caltex bridge. One on the railroad bridge. Elm Street was a sniper's dream. That's why the Presidential route was altered to go this way. Triangulated fire. First bullet hit the throat from the front (the rail road bridge). Second bullet hit him in the upper back (from the Caltex building). The third bullet, most likely a dum-dum bullet, hit him in the right temple and blew his brains out backwards: brain matter spraying the motorcycle police following the President's car (this fatal head shot was fired from behind the picket fence on the grassy knoll). Oswald was standing, innocent, at the front doorway of the Texas Book Depository building, at the time of the shootings. Most witnesses heard at least five shots. Their testimony was blatantly ignored by the Warren Commission, which was headed by Allen Dulles, the head of the C.I.A that JFK had fired over the Bay of Pigs failed C.I.A-backed 'invasion' of Cuba.

2
Weloveflyovercountry 2 points ago +2 / -0

and you can see the mc cops slow downa nd look toward grassy knoll (first shot?)

3
Sheprecon31 3 points ago +3 / -0

Imagine finding out out that probably the most famous potus apart from RR and DJT was put into office by lacosa nostra the mob never died it went covert as it was before still have power wouldn't be surprised if they messed about with the last election coup

2
TransamLq4 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because the secret service dude in the car behind him shot him after the first shot, or at least one senario

6
nozonozo 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's right.

Putting his brother in charge of going after the people who got him elected was a death sentence and indicative of the Kennedy hubris.

3
Sheprecon31 3 points ago +3 / -0

My man 👍 100%

1
Weloveflyovercountry 1 point ago +1 / -0

including poppy bush

8
TD_Covfefe_Crusader 8 points ago +8 / -0

Democrats engaged in ballot stuffing in the 1880 election for Pima County, Arizona sheriff. Members of the outlaw gang, the Cochise County Cowboys, gathered non-voters such as children and Chinese and had them cast ballots. They then gave names to all the dogs, donkeys, and poultry and cast ballots in their names for Shibell, the Democrat candidate.

8
I_trigger_faggots 8 points ago +8 / -0

And if somehow the will of the people prevails, they make you vote again and again until they get the result they want. Examples include countries voting to join the EU and Ireland voting to legalize abortion.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
2
racer513 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those that control the people in power want to protect their investment

1
ChippingToe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't get how they managed to convince society that elections are ever fair. Those who cheat will always win. It's simple math. Yeah maybe they started fair, but then one party discovered that if they cheat while nobody else cheats, they can win forever. Pretty soon it becomes clear that this is a game that favors dishonest, immoral and corrupt people. If you don't play dirty, you literally cannot win.

68
KickingPugilist 68 points ago +68 / -0

Notice the rise of socialist parties al across the world.

38
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 38 points ago +39 / -1

Russian commie party made the news a few weeks ago complaining about Americans rigging the Russian elections. I LOL'd.

17
DinosOnNoahsArk 17 points ago +17 / -0

Election fraud and manipulation is a staple of Democracy. It's only with advent of electronic voting and nearly anonymous mail-in voting that people have been able to take it to another level. Coupled with a complicit media that dares not question anything about the integrity of the election system, despite overwhelming evidence, and things have turned very very bad.

2
Phaedrus_Wolfe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well said!

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
20
ceremony_ 20 points ago +20 / -0

Notice California - who voted in Republican Governors twice in the 2000s, and was the home of Ronald Reagan, become completely fucking Blue.

Or New York - who voted in a Republican Governor in the 2000s, become completely fucking Blue.

Between California and New York, that's 70+ Electoral College seats, a ton of Representatives, and four Senators.

You actually don't need to cheat much more than that in a "normal" election.

What Trump did is break the bank, and force them to extend their hand into - of all places - Arizona and Georgia. Which is how they got caught.

But, Soros and his Open Society Foundation already was filling up the ranks of all State officials for the past thirty years with Leftists. It's just that the media never, ever mentioned this.

And now, when the Republic absolutely needs to depend on honest State officials, none are to be found.

14
AndyCuomoIsAMobster 14 points ago +15 / -1

My girlfriend lives in Peru and is immigrating here next year. They just went full Commie again, along with Columbia.

The communist party leeches to weaker nations to get closer to the big prize of the USA.

6
TrappedRed_in_blue 6 points ago +6 / -0

Peru was NEVER commie before now. It was the last holdout in South America. There is strong belief among the sane there that the commies cheated but they haven't been able to prove it. They may not ever, as the people have gotten less religious over time and more apathetic.

2
KickingPugilist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah Mr. Big hat man.

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
tashnag_01 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you truly want to know why, with an open mind, then here is an explanation:

https://www.churchmilitant.com/news/article/fatimas-warning-proved-true

Our Lady Of Fatima warned us that the errors of Russia will spread across the world. The worst is yet to come.

34
skywalk 34 points ago +34 / -0

How do you get tax increases when no person ever wants them?

22
Siteless_Vagrant [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

Easy, you go to Louisiana, home of the mysterious "the people voted for it" tax increases.

9
WhiskeyGiGi 9 points ago +9 / -0

And our Democrat governor, who was losing until the last 2 parishes came in...

21
QMAB 21 points ago +21 / -0

Have you ever read the wording they use for tax and other government measures we vote on? Seriously, sit down and carefully read a few ballot measures and how they are written.

They are so grammatically convoluted that even a college graduate has to read it at least three times to tease out what the actual subject, object and verb of the sentence is. They switch the language around so a "YES" answer would sound like you're against it when grammatically you should have written "NO", or vice versa.

This is what "casting spells" and "spellbinding" is. Hypnosis and manipulation of less aware people by using tricks of language to obstruct their intentions.

15
BillionsAndBillions 15 points ago +15 / -0

Do you not want to forbid elimination of current or future blocking of critical race theory removal from state school curriculum?

4
QMAB 4 points ago +4 / -0

This ^^^^ Statements like this!

2
Weloveflyovercountry 2 points ago +2 / -0

quadruple negative

4
citydwellertrumpfan 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Legalese" dialect.

3
QMAB 3 points ago +5 / -2

The concept of Legal Law all stems from the Talmud. Ancient ways to keep the goyi-eerr....cattle in the corral.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +3 / -4
1
QMAB 1 point ago +3 / -2

Oy vey, rabbi! Very sorry!

-2
deleted -2 points ago +2 / -4
2
Howabsolutelydareu 2 points ago +2 / -0

This. And it’s infuriating. I hope when they stand before God some day, He asks them questions using their own “language”.

2
UpTrump 2 points ago +2 / -0

People in California are crazy enough they always vote for increases

1
skywalk 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now do pot.

1
Weloveflyovercountry 1 point ago +1 / -0

the lefty gov wants people sedated and stupid

33
becky21k1 33 points ago +33 / -0

It was harder to rig prior to the advent of computer election counting. I think in that era they concentrated efforts on specific races and locations.

17
easyonthefiber 17 points ago +17 / -0

Baltimore still managed to rig things with mechanical voting machines. Look into the ellen sauerbrey vs Paris Glendennig race for Governor. There were accusations that machines arrived with votes already cast on them when they should have been zeroed out before voting.

And the often cited Athens, TN election after WWII. (“Battle of Athens”)

6
becky21k1 6 points ago +6 / -0

well I did say certain areas and races.

2
Weloveflyovercountry 2 points ago +2 / -0

machines have been coming in with thousands of ballots in dem favor before election day for decades.

2
posedgeclk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also the secret ballot. It looks good on paper...

2
julianleroux 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was harder to rig when everybody in the community knew who voted for who.

30
ItDoesntDoThat 30 points ago +31 / -1

Ted Kennedy left a woman to die when he was drunk driving and wrecked his car into a body of water.

It was covered up by three letter organizations.

Take that and multiply it by 40 years.

No one just wakes up and decides to be corrupt. It's a system and it grows over time. Large organizations have momentum, it is nearly impossible to turn them off their trajectory. They need to be dissolved or destroyed.

4
pepperonishoes 4 points ago +4 / -0

It is seductive.

Who said running for political office is like having sex. Once you do it you want to do it again.

1
Howabsolutelydareu 1 point ago +1 / -0

He also raped multiple women side by side with other politicians.

21
Frog_Anne 21 points ago +21 / -0

They've been rigging things even at the local level for decades. I had a very good teacher in school whose father was heavily involved in his local Democrat mafia. They would plot all sorts of things to get their people in office. One of his (the teacher's) jobs in high school was driving old people around to vote for dead people. They'd hit each polling place with their list of names, then around again as soon as the shift changed. He was an older teacher, so this would have been maybe early 60s.

It might not seem like a big deal, but the point was to tip the scales enough to get their person in place. From there, they can start tweaking things to reward their friends, extract more money from taxpayers, and push their own people toward other offices. They do the same thing now - get enough people in and they can do things like turn a blind eye to hiring illegal aliens, or use funding to pressure businesses to give them money. They use the funding threat on nursing homes so the Dems are allowed to steal votes of senile people.

Do that for long enough, and you end up with a situation like Nov 2020 - blatant fraud ignored by the very people whose job it is to secure elections and examine fraud, because they're either blackmailed by or indebted to the Dems to keep their position.

16
ControlledCuck 16 points ago +16 / -0

The German nationalist-populist party AfD (Alternativ für Deutschland/Alternative for Germany) went down from 12.6% to 10,3% in parliament or so, while immigrant-loving Socialists and Greens gained A LOT lol.. like A LOT. It's so obvious that they totally rigged their last election because they are scared of populism and nationalism gaining even more support. Since what I saw happened in 2020 I don't believe there are barely any legitimate elections in the western "free world" anywhere anymore, they don't even let people vote for soft opposition populist candidates that are only so slightly against the globalist-communist Great Reset agenda.

15
aangler100 15 points ago +15 / -0

You don't have to corrupt every single polling place. In the U.S. if you control 5-6 of the largest counties, you can change the Presidential election, a few Senators, and several Representatives.

JUST WITH 5-6 COUNTIES. MI, AZ, GA, PA, WI, MN, IL.....believe me.

2
Kotaro-Atani 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree, and in the Next Presidential election (2024), for example they wont need to cheat in Fulton County GA, but any other Democrat controlled county they have. They will give some excuse again that they cannot finish counting that night but they will keep counting and cheat again.

1
aangler100 1 point ago +1 / -0

The deepstate/Democrats/RINOs know hundreds of ways to cheat, and they use them all, always remember it is not just one thing.

Stopping mail in will not stop cheating, requiring ID will not stop cheating, more rules, Will. Not. Stop. Cheating.

Honest people will stop the cheating, or more realistically limit it to an insignificant level.

We can do it, we must do it. For Americans working together, nothing is impossible.

15
CanadianFren 15 points ago +15 / -0

The entire world is being taken over by a corrupt class of elites

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
2
WeAreGonnaWin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mainly through the leftist, green and socialist parties.

13
Sky_RPL 13 points ago +13 / -0

I get the sense that election rigging is like steroids in sports. You need to be cheating just to be competitive.

12
MrUSA 12 points ago +12 / -0

It's a miracle Trump actually got in office 2016. I'm convinced he won by so much more the 1st time

-3
deleted -3 points ago +2 / -5
12
mark1028 12 points ago +12 / -0

Just the election for George Washington. He really didn't want the job.

10
Absolon 10 points ago +10 / -0

One of the earliest recorded rigged elections in America was 1815. The man who "won" the presidency, didn't actually win. He was forcefully removed from office, so their is technically precedent for us to do that.

10
Pandas4Trump 10 points ago +10 / -0

There has been voter fraud since the invention of Democracy. Most of it happened in urban areas. The difference is it used to go both ways because political ideology wasn't the exact same globohomo in every single last Metro area across the globe. After WW1, in nearly every free nation, the fraud slowly starts to only benefit the left. Electronic voting and mail-in fraud are but the latest and greatest in urban clown tricks

-3
Therightisright -3 points ago +1 / -4

Are you really that brainwashed? Is it that hard for you to imagine people might not agree with your thinking? Like is it really that hard to imagine there is a large contingent of people who were not a fan of trump or another post-80s conservative and choose to vote against them, not because they support “the illegals are taking our land and the commies are taking our guns” agenda but instead because they simply didn’t like the candidate and felt they didn’t stand for voters’ fiscally conservative but socially status quo ideals?

I understand it’s hard to come to terms with a loss but to pretend like EVERY election was “rigged in favor of the left” is being blind to the fact that there are simply more registered democrats and independents then there are republicans, it’s simple as that. And before you go off on some “well half of those people are dead or moved away tangent” a nearly equal amount of the dead or moved people who had their votes counted were republican according to the audit.

As college education increases so does the # of democratic voters, call indoctrination if you’d like, but the education gap between the two parties has never been larger, and when you lack a formal education and critical thinking skills it becomes very easy for someone to choose to sit in an echo chamber to feel better about themselves then go out and realize they might actually be part of a shrinking and aging minority.

4
Pandas4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is it that hard for you to imagine people might not agree with your thinking?

I'm really weird. It's rather easy. Expected really. What subwin space do you want fren? Name it!

“rigged in favor of the left”

I disagree, but you are being exceptionally polite about it.

call indoctrination if you’d like

My college experience taught me that the ecological left is willing to excuse the following OPEN secrets regarding China:

-Genocide and organ harvesting of the Muslim Uyghurs in the Western Steppe
-The Burning of Christian Churches and Symbols throughout eastern China

  • Using half-century-old obsolete technology to create NEW coal power plants

Apparently, China is our greatest ally against Climate Change??? Why am I getting this sinking feeling that you're wanting a forum where Climate Change can be protected by Moderator fiat? Please don't fren. Nobody, not no one, is going to protect you from consumeproduct.win and the great degenerate network on that issue.

Does your culture have enough users? abc.win won't work, and even if it get's a subwin, the admin won't give you mods. What defines them in a way that can withstand an /r/parlerwatch brigade? What about them can withstand a consumeproduct brigade?

-3
Therightisright -3 points ago +1 / -4

What subwin space do I want? I want elementary level understanding of the human race throughout all groups. I want people to stop acting as if everything is so black and white. There is more to life than right or left, Trump or Biden, there are subcategories throughout the world that can coexist within a larger group. You can be upset about trump losing without assuming the only way he could have possibly lost was through malicious acts that perpetually favor the opposing side, that’s an argument children make. “That’s not fair! I wanted him to win so he should’ve won!”

As for your China point, who is excusing the Uyghur genocide or the burning of Christian symbols? Who on the left says that is okay? And while we’re bringing up attacking religious symbols let’s not pretend that we haven’t had our fair share of mosque, church and temple shootings or Quran burnings, beating of Muslim men and women and a call for religious and geographic based travel bans. If we can’t solve that problem in our country how exactly are we supposed to solve China’s? You think the supply chain is bad now, imagine when if you cut off China economically entirely, you wouldn’t see things on the shelves for years.

No one is claiming the issues over there aren’t troublesome, but to act like we don’t have our own to take care of is being willfully ignorant of what is going on around you. So long as everyone here looks at the “others” on the left as evil we will never solve our own problems.

4
Pandas4Trump 4 points ago +4 / -0

No one is excusing, but they are deliberately not bringing up genocide to the Chinese as state policy and it's not because of trade... It's not that the left are mustache twirling villains, but they did lose their limiting principles long ago. My family nearly died in 2020, not from some virus, but from hypothermia. The left's boundless desire for a fair and caring world nearly killed me and those I love the most. I want revenge against whoever believed "We're all in this together" or pushed covid restrictions. Those soul less cunts care more about nuisance wildlife than the beating hearts of my family. The ecological left would rather live in their bubble than take responsibility for the blood on their hands. Be in my family or China. Again it's an open secret. It's not like the New York Times or Harvard is going is going to publish that. I don't feel like looking it up for you, because I'm not a GW Qanon or a Gnostic Qanon out to defeat you in endless debating. We're not going to agree and that's perfectly fine. The subwin you want doesn't exist yet, but most of the local Lefties hang out in nonewnormal.win Sure, there's a lot of degenerate Gnostic Q spam, but it takes people like you to fight and build a community. Keep it up for long enough and the admins will add a moderator to handle the racism and religious intolerance.

-2
Therightisright -2 points ago +1 / -3

I’m sorry to hear about your family, I assume you’re talking about the Texas power grid issues? I think that was unforgivable but also a lot of the blame falls on the state government for the continued failure to plan for the future and the deer in headlights look they give anytime something preventable goes wrong.

I am happy you at least recognize that the religious and racial intolerance exists. I am all for free speech for the rampant antisemitic comments and homophobia really just people intolerant as opposed to staunch defenders of the first amendment. (Which they inherently do not understand if they think it means they can just walk around say whatever they want free of social consequences)

2
Pandas4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not doxxing myself sorry, but not even remotely close. The mayor, the city council, the unelected county health boards. They could have protected my family by simply not playing God and daddy. Not a single Top 100 city was able to withstand the propaganda onslaught. The left is not capable of inaction when action is murder. The left must act. It gets people killed, and they sweep the bodies under the rug. When I point out the blood, the left is blind to their own sin, and worse yet, the left often looks back and wishes it could have done more.

I'm glad the degenerates have a forum. They have a right to speak and have a mod. They don't have a right to spam and brigade

-1
Therightisright -1 points ago +1 / -2

Well in that case I have no clue what you’re talking about. I’m not sure how a mayor playing “god and daddy” would cause your family to get hypothermia, but you seem passionate about it (albeit a little rambling) so I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt.

8
DannyCanusa 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm not an expert, but I have spent a fair amount of time looking into election fraud. So I have more than a passing interest. I've probably spent a few hundred hours watching/reading various things on the topic. This is from 2014 or so. My interest in this topic started before I had a clue Trump was even going to run.

Anyway, in a nutshell stealing elections is low risk, high reward. Therefore it's going to happen a lot. It's been happening for decades in this country. Longer around the world.

My opinions on recent elections:

2020-Trump slammed Biden 2016- Trump slammed Clinton in the popular. On this one, back when it was reported she won the popular, I'd tell people that Trump actually won. The libs of course would laugh at me. The interesting take was conservatives. They were usually at least nice, because they wanted it to be true. Mostly though, they'd give me the proverbial pat on the head and say "that's nice, Danny."

I knew not to bring it up in a multi person debate, because it would be taken as a negative by both sides.

2012- Romney probably beat Obama. He was just a pussy about it. 2008- Obama probably beat McCain. The one who got boned in this election was Ron Paul in the primary. 2004- Kerry probably beat Bush. No way were the over lords going to not reward their little war puppet though. 2000- Gore beat Bush handily.

Then figure in the 1988 primary. Bush 1 stole the R nomination. Going into New Hampshire if Dole takes it, he's going to win. Bush got with NH Gov John Sununu to steal the election. As a reward, Bush makes him Chief of Staff.

Also, there's tons of corruption at the local levels. There's a saying about inner city politics of "if you keep voting D, you get what you deserve." While it's true most cities are mostly D, the split is often closer than reported. Basically if a D wins 80/20, the R's feel there's no reason to fight next election, because it's a battle they can't win.

If the truth was reported, that it was more 60/40, then the R's might start to battle. Next election might be 54/46, then the one after R's might actually win.

I may not have articulated that well. Basically in 2024 if there is an honest election, D's will win the bigger cities. However, if the numbers were reported accurately, the R's could close the gap in a lot of them by 2028, then actually start winning a few in 2032.

Finally (yea, this is a book)- small sample here, but even the D students have at least some similar opinions as we do. 3 college age daughters of a friend- all who hate Trump- They don't want the illegals pouring in here anymore than we do. They also despise the idea of having to take the vaccine. While they aren't ever going to vote Trump, there's certainly issues where they agree with conservatives.

7
Susurro 7 points ago +7 / -0

Elections Expert Capt. Seth Keshel — The Last Fair Election in the United States was 1988

https://www.bitchute.com/video/7hHsLgOJPeIg/

4
SwedishChainsaw2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm to believe George Bush won fairly? A fucking literal CIA agent? Gtfo. Lol

1
Susurro 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bush Senior probably did win. Coming off the Reagan popularity. But what Keshel is saying is that from Clinton's first term on the numbers don't make sense.

2
DannyCanusa 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe in the general, but Bush stole the primary that year in NH. That's why Gov John Sununu became Bush's Chief of Staff.

1
Phaedrus_Wolfe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I would be shocked if that one was not rigged. Bush = CIA. So far as I can tell, it appears to me that all elections since and including FDR have been rigged. Hence Eisenhower's famous warning.

6
Wearyman 6 points ago +6 / -0

There has always been cheating, on some level, in every election in history. Even in America's very first elections there was very low level cheating with some people using physical intimidation against others to ensure they voted "the correct way".

If you want to talk more organized "top down" and "modern" cheating, one need only to look at the Battle of Athens to see what it took to stop organized Democrat cheating just in one small town.

Cheating of some kind has always been with us.

But cheating like it was in 2020? Oh no. That's new. That level of sheer baldfaced, no shame cheating on a national scale and then to have it PASSED OVER when it was an obvious clear crime? That is our new national shame.

6
sir_rockness 6 points ago +7 / -1

I BET THE ELECTION OF 1789 DIDNT HAVE ANY TOMFOOLERY

6
RentedMule 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've always wondered how Democrats can run certain cities for decades (Philly, Baltimore, Chicago, Altlanta, etc.) and still always win the vote, despite running these cities into the ground. You would think the citizens would get fed up, and at least once in a while, put a Republican, or even an independent, in charge for a change. Historically rigged elections would explain a lot.

1
DannyCanusa 1 point ago +1 / -0

While those cities are mostly D, the numbers are closer than reported. The R's basically feel why fight in a place they have no chance. If elections were honest, the next cycle would be 55-45, which would give R's hope. Then the next cycle they'd win a few.

Note- I'm in no way a R. I am conservative, but by and large the R's can go fuck themselves. The scenario above was a basic explanation. If elections were TRULY honest, all sorts of 3rd parties would have a legit shot.

5
QMAB 5 points ago +5 / -0

you know what really fucking pisses me off? we have the means and technology to actually build a secure and automatic voting system that can be used and verified for each single voter, eliminating duplicates or invalid ballots.

But we still use this crazy old "tallying" technology that can be manipulated. And poll workers that are obviously biased cheating traitors. They can stick their fingers in the process any time they like and get no repercussions for it, but I can't even say "FUCK JOE BIDEN" right outside a polling place or I get arrested. Fucking bullshit.

1
Bullseyed 1 point ago +1 / -0

Easy, you vote on your tax return.

1
QMAB 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like your style!

5
brokentoenail 5 points ago +5 / -0

Which should make you question all of history, even the ones where you thought it was good for your "team".

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
16BeatsAOne 4 points ago +4 / -0
  1. The Donkey Party operatives didn't take into account how hated Hillary was. They rigged that election, but just not enough. So in order to compensate for their failures from 2016, those same operatives overrigged the 2020 election. There is no chance that this bithering Potato Head garnered 81 million votes.
4
hogstooth01 4 points ago +6 / -2

JFK was the last real elected President. When the other government people realized how much the citizens loved him. They vowed to destroy him. They feared him growing too powerful. So they had him killed. Then his brother showed interest and they saw the people loved him too. So they killed him. Ever since the Kennedy’s our elections have been fake. That is what I think anyway. They don’t want a President loved by the people.

8
Cuzyoudbeinjail 8 points ago +8 / -0

They stole the election to put Kennedy in, but he didn't play their games that why they killed him.

2
ThurstonHowell3rd 2 points ago +3 / -1

You might want to investigate the 1960 election a bit more before you say "JFK was the last real elected President." The ballot box stuffing fraud perpetrated in Illinois and Texas in 1960 was rampant, then immediately after JFK was declared the winner he appointed his brother Bobby to Attorney General (a man who had never argued a case in a courtroom) and he promptly shutdown any cases involving claims of election fraud. An example of which, in Angelina County, Texas, there were 187 votes counted for Kennedy and 24 for Nixon, but there were only 86 voters registered in the county.

No question that JFK was popular, but it's pretty clear that what him got elected wasn't just "the people".

4
rochrealtor 4 points ago +4 / -0

The day our paper ballot was terminated and scanners were installed the theft of America began.

4
MisanthropicGuru 4 points ago +4 / -0

"If voting changed anything, they'd make it illegal." -EG

4
aangler100 4 points ago +4 / -0

More Rules will not make elections fair and honest.

Fair and Honest people running elections, will make elections fair and honest.

1
Phaedrus_Wolfe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Either that, or Fair and Honest elections will make dishonest politicians.

3
OrangeCatBad 3 points ago +3 / -0

The districts needs to cap at a 1000 people to easily count, if any irregularities found the district should be full audited if multiple district have oddities the clerk should be fire, if the errors are blant violation of the law the clerks should be charge and send to jail

3
5DPancake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Elections are an illusion. The "powers that be" can't even fulfill their basic, sole job requirement which is to represent the people who voted for them. Nothing more. Their job isn't to make decisions, it's to echo the voices of those who put them in that position.

3
pikX 3 points ago +3 / -0

g l o b a l a u d i t (i wish)

3
agc1 3 points ago +3 / -0

Every election has rigging. We just outvote the fraud most of the time.

3
gloriouschairmanpao 3 points ago +3 / -0

Basically, no -- everything has been rigged since the Civil War. Use your common sense: if States are not allowed to voluntarily leave the Union, then we don't have a free country. Freedom necessarily includes the ability to opt out.

Techniques for rigging have evolved over time. Think about it. Gerrymandering is what? Election rigging. It's drawing district lines on the map specifically in order to engineer and generate the desired outcome.

The era of mass media has made rigging invisible. They never point the cameras at it, and so the elites have zero fear of exposure. For decades, they've been running political machine voting mills out of the blue strongholds -- Philadelphia, Atlanta, Chicago, New York City, San Francisco.

This is an inevitable outcome. Governments are inherently tyrannical, and will always grow more oppressive over time. It is the duty of the people to overthrow them when, not if, this occurs.

3
trumpsbluetie 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would be so refreshing if we just had a government that could admit we had irregularities, and not just gaslight us with the drone of "mOSt sECurE ElecTIon EvARR."

3
Argent 3 points ago +3 / -0

Pretty sure the one with George “I kill redcoats for fun” Washington was legit.

3
Goatboy66 3 points ago +3 / -0

Servers in Germany at a CIA Facility connected to Voting Machines in The U.S. during the Presidental Election, were apparently Seized in a Special Forces Raid.... IF TRUE, WHERE ARE THEY? HAVE THE BEEN INSPECTED....WHERES THE DATA?

3
theneverman 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when Ike ran against Filmore and they had trouble with the recount? Then Rosie O'Donnell came in with the lawyers? South Park gets it right more often than not.

3
I_blackfoot 3 points ago +3 / -0

I doubt it. When there is turds like Nancy P, Chucky Scamer, Turkey neck, and many others in Congress for 50 years there is something wrong. This is world wide. The entire system needs to be cleaned out.

3
UndeadRevolver 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, and regular purges are needed to destroy tyrannical power grabs. When we have peace and stability, commie scum have more time to corrupt all power structures. A massive, global tyranny is building and unprecedented deaths will be required to set things right.

1
citydwellertrumpfan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think it was Thomas Jefferson who said we need a revolution every 20 years or so.

3
TransamLq4 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ok, it's time to start playing there game. If they want to fucking shut down law suits, deny audits, and refused to investigate, then swim (😆) will stuff ballot boxes, volunteer poll watch as Democrat, ask for your bundle of ballots to fill out, and follow a particular ballot dispenser and collect them as the are delivered. After all, they won't demand an audit or investigations as it would expose them. We must not let them destroy our country

1
CoolAsACucumber 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. They already screamed cheating and election fraud when Trump was elected.

Just get ready to gut them like fish. They are working on doing the same to us.

3
TheRealJaredHolt 3 points ago +3 / -0

The consequences of election tampering are so incredibly dire that it should be a death penalty crime.

2
EagleOverTriumph 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm told since 2020 all elections have been secure and honest. You know, if you're a fucking moron. Which to be fair, covers the left, the RINOs, and the naive coomers and consumers.

2
PraiseBeToScience 2 points ago +2 / -0

Elections were harder to rig when technology was simpler. Now you can literally spray ballots out of a machine at a thousand a minute.

I would also say that elections are less likely to be rigged when you have most people still caring about the country. One of the keys to demoralization is you also instill a belief that it doesn't matter if you 'cheat' the system because the system is racist and grotesque, and that your anathema politics are so faultless that the ends justify the means.

2
Bohemyth_2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Based George Washington had to reject the fixed kingship they wanted to give him

1
Homemade-Soap 1 point ago +1 / -0

He probably would've accepted if he could see 2021

2
Forgotmyname 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would say outside of the first few elections in the us none of them have been legit. I would imagine there was some small scale cheating even if the first few.

2
CrAzD 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don't think we ever have. We can just see it now.

2
Weloveflyovercountry 2 points ago +2 / -0

and angela merkel will be queen of europe forever, unless....

2
Kholland65 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s the 21st century. What aspect of our lives isn’t corrupt at this point.

Even if global warming was real, this planet abs everyone in it deserves to burn.

2
SeeWithYourMind 2 points ago +2 / -0

G L O B A L S C A M D E M I C

2
least_counties_ever 2 points ago +2 / -0

Democracy only works when most people believe in God.

2
Juzeza 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hopefully this sets off a trend worldwide and we can get back to normalcy all across the globe. Think about the posibilities