1092
Comments (219)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
1
GrumpyGrumpus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because if you tried to include all the data within one table, it would be damn messy to read.

827 consists of 104 spontaneous abortions + 712 live births + 1 still birth + 10 other outcomes.

Among 827 participants who had a completed pregnancy, the pregnancy resulted in a live birth in 712 (86.1%), in a spontaneous abortion in 104 (12.6%), in stillbirth in 1 (0.1%), and in other outcomes (induced abortion and ectopic pregnancy) in 10 (1.2%).

The 700 is simply informational about how many of the 827 had received a vaccine in the 3rd trimester.

1
whataboob [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did they include the 700 women when dividing 104?

The 104 couldn’t possibly be related to the 700, that’s the point.

1
GrumpyGrumpus 1 point ago +1 / -0

THEY DIDN"T.

You are the one bringing the 700 into the equation, in a stupid and idiotic way.

1
whataboob [S] 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not. Look at their own math.

How did they arrive at 12.6%? They divided 104 by 827. Cmon.