3441
Notorious Drunk offended by unverified Twitter account. (media.patriots.win) 🛑  Corrupt Commies  🛑
posted ago by d_bokk ago by d_bokk +3441 / -0
Comments (90)
sorted by:
217
deleted 217 points ago +218 / -1
148
The_End_Arrives 148 points ago +148 / -0

Politicians are the only ones who should be tracked and monitored 24/7.

Video and audio recordings. Nothing they do should be secret.

42
MasterChef 42 points ago +42 / -0

I may have to keep a bottle of bleach on hand to clean my eyes out if they're on camera 24/7

14
Annoyedwiththedevoid 14 points ago +14 / -0

I mean it's absolutely disgusting but say youre a corrupt politician, what if they had a secret phone next to their toilet which they use (the phone, not the toilet, had to clarify) to make their evil deals with?

6
rufrignkidnme 6 points ago +6 / -0

Phones don't plug into the wall anymore. So, a cell phone or burner phone is what they'd need, not necessarily the toilet.

I guess there are some people who still have 'land lines' but they're like the people who were had 8 track players in the mid 80's

7
tom_machine 7 points ago +7 / -0

They probably do all their evil shit on their regular cell phones, like everyone else.

6
rufrignkidnme 6 points ago +6 / -0

I've never ever ever done any shady shit in my life. However, never use a burner more than once. Destroy your sim cards.

7
tom_machine 7 points ago +7 / -0

Me neither, fren. I usually just put my SIM cards through the same meat grinder I normally use for bones.

3
Annoyedwiththedevoid 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah but my point was that there arent cameras in bathrooms, the part of the toilet was just to be silly, of course itd be on a counter or something hahaha

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm not happy unless I see Nancy take a shit

On second thought, sorry national security we might have to give her that one

1
DJTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

The MSM ran a story about how they want to put cameras inside of every toilet so they can take "anus scans" and use people's anus to identify individuals like with a retina scan. I'm sure this article is a quick online search away.

1
Annoyedwiththedevoid 1 point ago +1 / -0

HAHAHAHAHA

4
HillarysBustedDonut 4 points ago +4 / -0

Here's a picture of Chuck Schumer with his burner phone (and Alex Soros):

https://files.catbox.moe/wjf0wh.jpg

1
4thWay 1 point ago +1 / -0

"What if they used a server, perhaps, located in a basement to do their dirty work." Hah! Implausible. Who would EVER do anything like that?

19
deleted 19 points ago +19 / -0
7
resoluteAction 7 points ago +7 / -0

I believe the trades are public but hidden. Thus the ability of this great tracker account.

2
crossin_rubies 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not hidden, but not made public in real time. They are disclosed afterterwards, something like 30 days or there about.

4
559throw 4 points ago +4 / -0

With great power comes great responsibility

1
Quietam_Unum 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you have the ability to write lawspend other peoples' money, your life needs to be livestreamed 24/7.

My re-interpretation. [EDIT] Bonus is that covers their staff (possibly the real deepstate) and families if they share any expenses.

1
F_O_H 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s give the politicians a deal, their privacy can be violated HALF as much as they violate ours

8
K-Harbour 8 points ago +8 / -0

What if all members of Congress had to have all their email and text communications automatically publicly posted in real time?

3
rufrignkidnme 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know our enemies would love that shit.

We need to have a justice system that beheads motherfuckers who commit treason or violate their oath and work against the constitution.

24/7 surveillance of our leaders would lead to the surveillance of everyone. Wait until the State comes to install camera's in your Livingroom to catch domestic violence.

2
LivingOnSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Kid Pron Galore. That's mainly all you'd see. Kid pron and Snuff films.

1
Equality72521 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is why all of them have been using use private email servers for decades now. They take no chances that any of their communications can be disclosed under FOIA.

3
archvile7 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy shit this

I thought of this idea years ago, why wouldn't or shouldn't public servants be required to wear a bodycam 24/7 that could be watched by anybody? You can't get more accountable than that.

THEY are the servants.

1
Azrael1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

10000000% agree with this. You get paid by tax dollars then your entire life is an open book for the people who pay your salary to read.

9
deleted 9 points ago +9 / -0
2
TrumpCityPopMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Their investments are public info. Of course it's really tough to find on the web tho. If anyone finds that website please share.

85
FreeNow 85 points ago +85 / -0

She has over $600 in her portfolio, what's the problem.

20
Trubs 20 points ago +20 / -0

Great point.

10
Farage_massage 10 points ago +10 / -0

As if they’re going to look at Democrat leaderships finances😂😂😂😂😂

8
ShadowPatriot21 8 points ago +8 / -0

They also exempt themselves from vaccines mandates. Dems don’t play by rules

2
anotherthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

The problem will be if her lawyers decide to pursue this and there's an actual reporter covering the discovery process of the trial.

47
TEXinLA 47 points ago +47 / -0

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

4
NotJudging 4 points ago +4 / -0

Glorious

39
Tonez240 39 points ago +40 / -1

The way things have been going if you don’t mind your business you might end up committing suicide.

23
jdog 23 points ago +23 / -0

Or be thrown in jail without a speedy trial.

3
YankeeHutt 3 points ago +3 / -0

Getting sucided

FTFY

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
Dckman 17 points ago +17 / -0

Only a matter of time before her best friend Jack bans him.

12
IvIA6A 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep. They already have insider programs at fake book that allow powerful to suppress and remove content they find inconvenient.

15
Mediaqueen 15 points ago +15 / -0

Great title

15
KekistanPM 15 points ago +15 / -0

"It's public information."

"Y-you can't compile public information like that!"

11
Farage_massage 11 points ago +11 / -0

“I will not name names” - WHY?

19
d_bokk [S] 19 points ago +20 / -1

Because it's obvious.

2
Cliffinati 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's Nancy Pelosis portfolio tracker there's literally only one person who'd be able to sue over it

1
NoFakeNewsCommies 1 point ago +2 / -1

There's probably no cease and desist order. Amy text post on the internet is fake until proven otherwise and this account got a lot of free advertising just now

0
Farage_massage 0 points ago +1 / -1

My thoughts exactly - the only reason you wouldn’t name them is because it would be libelous if untrue...

10
ChynahIzAzzhole 10 points ago +10 / -0

Omg...omg... if I had invested 10K when Nancyvtook office in the EXACT same stock she did... I would NEVER have lost a penny and I would be up 120 MILLION!!! .

8
runonce 8 points ago +8 / -0

Hey there drunky, just wake up?

7
HiddenDekuScrub 7 points ago +7 / -0

Guess we don't have to ask who, huh?

7
least_counties_ever 7 points ago +7 / -0

Nancy Pelosi, and other Democrats, love the shit show of corruption we are in because it makes it easier to keep their own corruption under the radar. The reason no one is talking about Nancy Pelosi’s insider trading is because there is too much other corruption to talk about. She likes it that way. She’s a dystopian opportunist.

3
DZP1 3 points ago +3 / -0

I like how you euphemized the word "bitch" as 'dystopian opportunist'

7
rufrignkidnme 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just a word of caution. If you get info about a trade Nancy is making and you put money into it and make out with big profits, Beware the SEC.. they will arrest YOU for insider trading for acting on the info you got from Nancy

2
Cliffinati 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because for some reason it's not insider trading if a politician does it

6
shadows_of_the_mind 6 points ago +6 / -0

Name names. Let’s hear it. Who’s being a whiny bitch hiding behind the strong arm of the federal government?

12
Amaroq64 12 points ago +12 / -0

Look at the account name lol

6
Brobold 6 points ago +6 / -0

Is there an ETF of Congressional positions?

1
codesherpa 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was thinking the same thing...let's see 12 month returns of the Congressional Insider Trading Fund (CITF) are 12,497%, not bad. Not bad at all. It's almost as if being able to know insider information a year in advance before anyone else and being able to directly impact the bottom line of a company has some type of financial advantage.

1
Slugbert 1 point ago +1 / -0

Asking the important (rhetorical) questions.

5
noammoblues 5 points ago +5 / -0

Pollical? Who knew Biden's senility was contagious?

4
RusherOfDin 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hopefully the portfolio tracker hero will fight this to the bitter end. The more they clamp down the more people will find out about Nancy Pelosi's obvious insider trading. Streisand Effect FTW.

4
BrianOfNazareth 4 points ago +4 / -0

What is the ticker symbol for the Pelosi ETF? Seriously? I'd buy the shit out of that.

3
FreeNow 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone needs to come up with the corrupt politician tracking ETF fund. Because we all deserve our 10%.

3
BostonVoter 3 points ago +3 / -0

It would be much easier to not commit insider trading. This has become genius

3
Brokenmatrix2021 3 points ago +3 / -0

Should read " representing someone high in the political office "

2
TaxDollarsHardAtWork 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hope they post the letter, I know I would.

2
ConservativeChris 2 points ago +2 / -0

This post needs a Party of Crime badge.

2
Tenspot20 2 points ago +2 / -0

Was that order signed by a judge?

1
OriginalDuplicate 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not a court order, it's a letter from a private attorney. Lawyers can say whatever they want in those letters, doesn't mean you have to do it.

1
Tenspot20 1 point ago +1 / -0

I see, Thank You!

2
Minn2000 2 points ago +2 / -0

Keep going man.

You're not impersonating her.

You're not lying.

If they send you to court, someone would probably cover attorney expenses for you seeing it's against Pelosi.

2
LivingOnSalt 2 points ago +2 / -0

The publicity of these trades is obligatory isn't it? how the fuck can they tell you to "stop posting this public information"? I need to get in on those stonks before they start making them wonky on purpose.

2
benfordslaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

This Nancy Pelosi diss track is hot: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sBpPpUrfWsw

i didn't know she had a huge fridge of ice cream in addition to being a crazy drunk

2
that_guy_pming_tits 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder who it could be? Kek.

1
Tycobbsalad 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's cool....i'm not gonna cease and desist either...

1
YN31964 1 point ago +1 / -0

Slobbering Nancy Pelosi.....the greatest ad poster for vodka the world has ever seen.

1
Thirsty_Liberty_Tree 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is the act of copying her investment strategy considered Insider Trading?

1
Lol_Garrus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cease and desist? For what?

its public info anyway.

1
1776ThereIsaidIt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Couldn't she just call Jack?

1
USAGUY1691 1 point ago +1 / -0

Over Target ....... Release the Kracken..

1
FerkenBlerkin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well that pollical office person better have top shelf drinks ready

1
DeepWinter 1 point ago +1 / -0

*nor

But bravo! Keep up the pressure!