6346
Trump Announces Trump Media & Technology Group & Launches TRUTH SOCIAL! (media.communities.win)    TRUMP STATEMENT   
posted ago by Restore ago by Restore +6353 / -7
Comments (1664)
sorted by:
603
Restore [S] 603 points ago +605 / -2

“TMTG was founded with a mission to give a voice to all. I'm excited to soon begin sharing my thoughts on TRUTH Social and to fight back against Big Tech. Everyone asks me why doesn’t someone stand up to Big Tech? Well, we will be soon!”

https://truthsocial.com

316
Restore [S] 316 points ago +331 / -15

Exactly this: "My fellow Americans, the Storm is upon us......."

206
Gadsden 206 points ago +212 / -6

I actually hope so.

I don't buy the Q stuff, but I'd prefer that reality over the actual one.

135
DinosOnNoahsArk 135 points ago +200 / -65

If he's doing this to fight back, he's setting himself up to lose!

No joking here.

Apple, Google, they'll both ban his app for a variety of reasons, just like they did Gab.

Then he'll be stuck with a web app only, which has proven to be lesser than.

It's unfortunate, but that's reality. The fight is bigger than an app.

My only hope is that Trump knows all this, his team and corporation know all this, and they have a solid plan and goal with all this that we don't know about yet.

141
NotMyGovernor 141 points ago +151 / -10

You don’t know the power of support (from someone like Trump). If he supports it, it’s real, and it’s good then it’ll take off and own and dominate. In the realm it’s meant for though, it won’t be a family media replacement.

74
Xuvial 74 points ago +84 / -10

In the realm it’s meant for though

Well sure, it will dominate just like .win is already the dominant MAGA forum. But that kind of dominance doesn't mean anything as far as the masses of normies are concerned. MSM will do one of two things in response:

  1. Completely ignore TMTG and keep the masses oblivious to it's existence (like .win).

  2. Falsely paint TMTG as a platform for domestic terrorists, crazies, nazis, etc.

79
TakingCoatsWIN 79 points ago +79 / -0

When it comes to number 1. Trump isn't behind .win though. He won't be going on Hannity and all the other normie media for .win but he would be doing it for his site, big difference.

And with number 2. They will always do that. Getting called racist or whatever cannot be a reason to not fight back.

3
deleted 3 points ago +18 / -15
24
Carry_Your_Name 24 points ago +25 / -1

This depends on what kind of "truth" will be posted and shared on that platform. If it's just politics, exposing this scandal or endorsing that candidate, then it won't be a big deal, they won't give a damn; but if it has any medical claim remotely against the clotshot or the mandate thereof, then you can expect the fiery wrath of fire and brimstone they rain upon it. Remember, they're practicing a false religion. You can trash their high priests, those politicians and "experts," that's still tolerable, but don't you dare to blaspheme Pfizer, their golden calf!

12
texas4ever 12 points ago +12 / -0

The main benefit will just be more people exposed to what's going on. There are tons of conservatives that only read Fox News etc. Sites like this, the Gateway Pundit etc. have a lot of great news, but the readership is too low (Gateway Pundit has horrible titles and is overly dramatic, but a lot of the content is true, mixed in with some BS unvetted stories). Fox News has literally become worse than CNN, with our country being destroyed they run Gabbie Petito as the top story which is a giant FU to anyone who cares about our country.

10
Xuvial 10 points ago +11 / -1

but if it has any medical claim remotely against the clotshot or the mandate thereof, then you can expect the fiery wrath of fire and brimstone they rain upon it.

Doubt it considering the damage is already done, the majority of the developed Western world has already taken the clot shot. Some smaller countries are already at 90% vaccination rate. Going forward they won't care who makes medical claims against it, because they won't need to.

13
OneBigMaga 13 points ago +16 / -3

Msm ratings are in the toilet. Pfizer is the only thing keeping most of them on the air. If Trump creates a social media platform it will do great by word of mouth alone.

13
deleted 13 points ago +16 / -3
9
texas4ever 9 points ago +10 / -1

This site is great and hilarious, but much more limited. It's much more for people who are already hardened and know how bad things are, but most people don't yet. Terms used like calling people faggots aren't exactly going to do a great job convincing moderate independents to our side. Trump's new platform will go big.

8
GayTexasPede 8 points ago +11 / -3

I always cringe when I see somebody using that word here but I'm not a snowflake so I get over it

26
ceremony_ 26 points ago +28 / -2

As a public listed company, you have to keep in mind that the degree of "Truth" and freedom of speech will be severely restricted.

If you thought GETTR vs. Gab was a big difference in freedom of speech, a public listed company is a totally different animal.

I don't think this was the approach Trump should have taken.

Maybe he just wanted to make Patriots rich? Who knows.

12
deleted 12 points ago +19 / -7
8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +18 / -10

Rule 1

Trump Supporters Our community is a high-energy rally for supporters of President Trump.

go back to Beijing Charlie Chan

2
MajorClark 2 points ago +2 / -0

Your post is the dumbest thing I've read in weeks.

7
texas4ever 7 points ago +8 / -1

If he and Patriots get rich, that's a good thing. I'd imagine people that make a killing off of this stock will contribute a lot of money to good causes.

Secondly it's understandable as people are pissed off and discouraged, but we have to stop thinking in black and white terms. Anything Trump does even if imperfect is going to be a hell of a lot better than Facebook, Twitter, Fox etc.

2
ceremony_ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm suggesting that Trump could have gotten private funding outside of Wall Street.

2
JimJordansJacket 2 points ago +2 / -0

I bought all I could afford last night at $9.50/share. It’s currently at $65.55.

Somebody mentioned making patriots rich in this thread. Believe me, he already has in the first 24 hours

2
Tcrlaf1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Could open above $80 in the morning, and hit $150+ a share. That is a lot of folks betting big money on an idea. Tell every lib you know to SHORT this immediately. And then laugh your ass off at them when they have to sell everything they own to cover.

6
QSWO1 6 points ago +7 / -1

Public listed companies no longer have constitutional Rights? Explain that to me.

25
ceremony_ 25 points ago +26 / -1

As a public company, you need a Board of Directors, you have to have shareholder's meetings, voting rights, etc.

The majority of the investments in this enterprise (if it shows up on the radar), would be from huge institutional piles of money.

After you factor all this in, there's no possible way that the company or the product could be a "Free Speech" platform.

4
KingOfTards 4 points ago +5 / -1

No. It's really simple.

You have public and private behaviors. You have similar options online with various degrees.

Social media disrupted mainstream like Video did with radio. With mainstream controlling social media, it allows them to manipulate and omit visibility by trends and search algorithms. This along with fake accounts that are "verified" and not verified gives them a way to make unpopular opinions seem popular. Dopamine is a drug and virtue signaling is a rewarded behavior along with victimhood. All are not a reality outside of social media for majority of the country. However its influencing behaviors so much that someday it will.

Now Gab is a right wing anonymous platform. It's not designed to keep shills and manipulation out. You have a lot of low info shared because of the anonymous account creation. This is one form of social media.

We need a competitor to Twitter. We need to disrupt Jack and his illusions. Gab will never replace Twitter. GETTR is a neutral platform and so is Truth. It's not for MAGA or for anonymous shilling. It's a information platform that will allow both sides to share their opinions. Its Twitter minus the censorship. Its Gab minus the anonymous shilling and ALT accounts. It's a higher quality forum. It will not replace Patriots because both compliment each other like Reddit and Twitter.

5
ceremony_ 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have absolutely no argument against not just one, but many competitors as possible in the social media space.

My argument that this should be a privately funded enterprise controlled by investors who will remain true to Free Speech.

Opening up the company to be taken over by Wall Street/Davos is definitely not the way to build a competitor.

4
FliesTheFlag 4 points ago +4 / -0

Gettr was a failure when they picked that stupid name.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +4 / -1

why is a publicly listed company different?

it just has to please the stockholders- which it will

it will generate growth and the platform will just get bigger and better

15
ceremony_ 15 points ago +15 / -0

"Stockholders" for any decent-sized public company reads like a whos-who of hedge funds and asset managers.

This is to say that BlackRock, Fidelity, Vanguard, Millennium Management (just as examples) would become the top shareholders of the stock within a year.

And the Board dictates who the agents (Executives) of the corporation are.

These people are Davos. They are the same ones who have enormous investments in Facebook, Google, Twitter, Amazon.

So the notion of a publicly traded company representing Free Speech is absurd, at best.

13
Bigblue725 13 points ago +15 / -2

Facebook was first for college kids, you couldn’t even sign up without a college email, and was getting its ass kicked by MySpace. Google was in a dead heat competition with Yahoo.

This new Truth is going to have a significantly stronger launch and following out of the gate than any predecessor.

It’s all about a cozy user interface.

4
Dictator_Bob 4 points ago +4 / -0

It’s all about a cozy user interface.

The #1 reason we can't get people off of these other platforms. FB UI is a trainwreck too, sadly. Without their dopamine triggers and established audience it'd fall apart. Goog products are incredibly well researched, though. But nothing cannot be copied or out-innovated.

0
Tellman125 0 points ago +1 / -1

nothing cannot be copied or out-innovated.

What do you mean? FB copied and out-innovated and out-promoted elements from MySpace, Twitter, Tumblr, Pinterest, and Snapchat, and also outright bought Instagram and WhatsApp. I can't stand FB, but that's what they've done.

3
mugatucrazypills 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why not ?

2
Saltyminer11 2 points ago +3 / -1

Exactly. He is going big with this.

47
Trumpdup4prez 47 points ago +49 / -2

It’s not about an app. It’s about a media company. He’s gonna have TMTG news channel, TMTG+ streaming, he’s already tapped non-woke Hollywood producers to build content for his channel. This is gonna be YUUGEEEE

10
dldeuce 10 points ago +12 / -2

Not to mention that if it's done well, the world will drop big tech media in a heartbeat. Should we short Twitter?

1
Choppermagic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Twitter was already dying before Trump saved them

1
YankeeHutt 1 point ago +1 / -0

Years away from thinking about that, I'd say. [ And just did. :)]

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like the early promos for FRANK.

1
Trumpdup4prez 1 point ago +1 / -0

Except it’s a publicly traded company worth 4B

Trump is not a pillow guy. He’s Trump. He’s gonna do this right.

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Publicly traded means jack shit. Outside of trump and a few others almost every publicly traded company wants to tattoo Marx on your forehead.

-1
BoltBoltBoltBolt90 -1 points ago +1 / -2

if you're looking for right-wing streaming, check out the recently launched cozy.tv

-11
deleted -11 points ago +4 / -15
10
OneBigMaga 10 points ago +11 / -1

If it's not woke, it's not a grift. People want freedom from woke and lgbt garbage and if this delivers, then he is giving people what they want.

45
jda70 45 points ago +47 / -2

Here's the thing tho...Trump had to do something for the midterms and 2024. He couldn't rely on Gab, TD, Rumble and others like them. He's needed his own Media Platform since 2018. Trump really needs to get back into Washington DC in order to take on Facebook and Twitter. Imagine Trump as President and Twitter says no you are still Banned? They'll have to give his account back. :)

21
Xuvial 21 points ago +21 / -0

They'll have to give his account back. :)

Wasn't Trump already suing Twitter/Facebook/etc to make them give his account back? Whatever happened to that?

24
dldeuce 24 points ago +26 / -2

Everyone in the country should read Trump's lawsuit against Twitter. This lawsuit makes the case that Twitter is a state actor in it's censorship. That's the key argument that needs to be made for the collusion between government and corporations that is crushing all our rights. The government can't outsource the wholesale violation of our rights. Read the case: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60041159/1/trump-v-twitter-inc/

9
jomten 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the rulings on corporations being allowed to violate the constitution were a huge mistake.

Corporations getting to own and profit from slave labor (private prison labor), deny first amendment rights (big tech), second amendment rights (no firearms allowed in businesses, by employees)

Its retarded and should have been stopped long ago.

5
Retard_Strength 5 points ago +5 / -0

they call this 'censorship laundering'

the government can't quite outright censor people, but 'businesses' that are beholden and friendly to the government can

10
Snoman 10 points ago +10 / -0

Good question, there was a lawsuit and I remember hearing something about it through Barnes.

18
emkayyy 18 points ago +19 / -1

Our court systems are a joke. My dad is still dealing with a lawsuit in which he was a passenger in a car that was struck by a very intoxicated driver who crossed the center line. That driver died. As a passenger in a car in which the driver wasn’t at fault he clearly has no culpability but is having to sue for medical etc. This began in 2018. Slowwwww.

If Trump did sue, nothing will happen for a couple years at least.

10
ChelseaHubbell 10 points ago +12 / -2

There's a reason why they targeted and took out the Viking Parscale. That dude was honey trapped.

11
Dictator_Bob 11 points ago +13 / -2

They got him good though. AOC worked directly with the CCP on their TikTok algo. Then they convinced him of the data. That was a prime time clandestine OP. AOC's handlers should have been thrown into prison for that and instead, TikTok is operating on our shores.

10
FormerGraveheart 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wait, what happened? I wasn't aware of anything that happened with Parscale, TikTok, and AOC.

9
TeeBP 9 points ago +11 / -2

How much you wanna bet they'll ban it riiiight before the midterms and drag the court case to get it unbanned past 2024.

7
Trumpwon306 7 points ago +8 / -1

What?

He couldn't rely on Gab, TD, Rumble and others like them.

Why not Gab?

6
infojunkie07 6 points ago +7 / -1

Why couldnt he rely on GAB ,? Of all the platforms he 'd have most freedom there.

You think the entire establishment , backstabbers and RINOS that pushed him out will let him have his OWN network. LOL.

5
TheThreeSeashells 5 points ago +6 / -1

Because the people surrounding President Trump who have been passing him bad advice are likely constantly bombarding him with the false notion that Gab is a platform for anti-Semites. Wouldn't be surprised if his moron daughter Ivanka is leading that group.

4
julianReyes 4 points ago +5 / -1

Probably stated by Republicans who still scream "DAS RAYCISS" and mean it.

-5
ggnoreeeeeeeeeee -5 points ago +2 / -7

gab is trash and run on trash hardware that will crash in trump goes on it

5
Imransgarage 5 points ago +5 / -0

Early returns sound like Trump's team is launching with the system that already didn't work for Gab and had to be replaced when they got big so... this is unlikely to age well.

30
Yeti2 30 points ago +30 / -0

We can create a link to a responsive web page in Android, it's easy and behaves like an app. Thats how gab works now, no need to install an app.

17
loverat 17 points ago +19 / -2

I can't fucking believe so many people STILL think you need an app. My fucking God I was born in 1965 started using computers when they first came out and young people have the audacity to call me out of touch or a Boomer.

10
OneBigMaga 10 points ago +11 / -1

The xactly. Kids these day are lazy and stupid and they prove it every time they blame boomers for their problems while they spend most of their day playing video games and blabbing on social media while ignoring the world around them.

If you haven't figured out how to make and use a bookmark on your phones browser yet, you are an idiot.

1
trump_2077 1 point ago +2 / -1

My fucking God he was born in 1965 started using computers when they first came out he's not a phone expert don't call him an idiot pede.

5
cal5583 5 points ago +6 / -1

the tablet generation are retards, they dont know how to troubleshoot because everythings been automated. if they had to set irqs to make a device work theyd shit themselves.

12
Thewickersnipper 12 points ago +12 / -0

Works on iPhone too.

4
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 4 points ago +4 / -0

it can have that function and still be listed on App stores. You should do both.

3
DinosOnNoahsArk 3 points ago +5 / -2

Except it's missing the important features, like push notifications...

4
OneBigMaga 4 points ago +5 / -1

You mean like getting an email alert? All web sites can do that. You don't need a privacy invading app for that.

2
DinosOnNoahsArk 2 points ago +4 / -2

No, I mean the native integrations with the operating system.

3
trump_2077 3 points ago +3 / -0

The xactly. Kids these day are lazy and stupid and they prove it every time they blame boomers for their problems while they spend most of their day playing video games and blabbing on social media while ignoring the world around them.

If you haven't figured out how to make and use a bookmark on your phones browser yet, you are an idiot.

19
WowStrongWinning 19 points ago +19 / -0

You can see install mobile apps outside the apps store.

10
atoftw 10 points ago +12 / -2

This is true but not everybody has time/motivation or the knowledge to go into their developer settings and allow app installation from unknown sources. This alone would reduce the app audience by a fair margin. There has to be another way.

14
Trumpdup4prez 14 points ago +14 / -0

It’s not an app only play. It’s an entire media and entertainment company with channels and streaming.

12
cal5583 12 points ago +14 / -2

if people cant be bothered to take the 5 mins it takes to learn how to install an app they deserve the great reset and all its consequences.

5
HairEStamper 5 points ago +5 / -0

This

10
1080pleb 10 points ago +13 / -3

He's not looking for everybody. But those who are willing to get off their ass to save our country should at least be able to download an app outside the store.

2
trump_2077 2 points ago +3 / -1

The xactly. Kids these day are lazy and stupid and they prove it every time they blame boomers for their problems while they spend most of their day playing video games and blabbing on social media while ignoring the world around them.

If you haven't figured out how to make and use a bookmark on your phones browser yet, you are an idiot.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

it a quick setting on an android

4
NoCoupForYou 4 points ago +4 / -0

Visit the website direct. I visit patriots.win on my phone, no app needed.

I loathe apps, and I'm a Gen-Xer. I imagine Boomers who came on board around the 2000s are used to just putting in the URL too.

3
infojunkie07 3 points ago +3 / -0

for now. But they could restrict it for "security" reasons.

15
Restore [S] 15 points ago +16 / -1

You could buy a FJB shirt since you don’t buy Q merchandise. 😉

6
texas4ever 6 points ago +8 / -2

Q takes the truth then adds a bunch of crazy to it. I mean the premise that most of our leaders are corrupt and in it for the money and power, and don't care for the peasants, that's pretty much true. Saying they are all pedophiles etc. is a stretch...I don't think a lot of guys like Romney etc. are, they just think they are better and more important than you and could care less about your problems, drug addiction, open borders, things like that.

11
Gadsden 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm a federal employee, and I shared an office with osi investigators that specialized in child pornography crimes....

Their only job is to investigate federal employees that violate this specific law, and all of them were swamped, year round.

I know that's anecdotal, but that part of the Q deal wouldn't actually stun me.

4
texas4ever 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'd certainly suspect some of this activity, some politicians have been convicted already. I don't think the majority engage in this behavior, though...most are just in it for the money and privilege (not as if that's a good thing of course). I think some of the Lin Wood type accusations do not help our cause...he's a great lawyer but tends to jump to conclusions and get overly emotional too quickly.

Not sure about the middle and lower ranks, I was mainly referring to Congress and people at that level. Personally I mostly see people like Ryan, Romney, McConnell, Pelosi etc. have better returns that the top investors in the world and see that as the biggest problem.

Like anything else in life, if there's not much accountability I would expect the problem to get worse.

2
Gadsden 2 points ago +3 / -1

You're absolutely right.

Also, I wasn't trying to say the top corrupt officials are all pedophiles, I was simply pointing out that there are far, FAR more pedophiles than most people think. It's obscene.

As for investing, for some reason congress is allowed to insider trade. I can only imagine that congress voted themselves the right to insider trade, and now we're simply supposed to accept it.

2
trump_2077 2 points ago +3 / -1

The xactly. Kids these day are lazy and stupid and they prove it every time they blame boomers for their problems while they spend most of their day playing video games and blabbing on social media while ignoring the world around them.

If you haven't figured out how to make and use a bookmark on your phones browser yet, you are an idiot.

6
givethismanacoat 6 points ago +6 / -0

At this point it’s my only hope.

2
SeenYourFreedom 2 points ago +3 / -1

This pretty much sums it up. You know it's a lie, but you want it to be true.

2
Gadsden 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely.

37
lordvon 37 points ago +38 / -1

oh fuck i just got a hopium overdose

5
Ophelia 5 points ago +5 / -0

Me too

34
jeeeezus 34 points ago +34 / -0

Registered Trademarks (T Media Tech, LLC)

| TRUTHSOCIAL | RETRUTH | TRUTHING | FOLLOW THE TRUTH | POST A TRUTH | TMTG+ |

https://trademarks.justia.com/owners/t-media-tech-llc-4987434/

26
Forgotmypass666 26 points ago +26 / -0

The truth is out there?

11
peterthegreen 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, as well as Justice and the American Way, though Pedowood and the Entertainment Industry have abandoned these principles.

18
Forgotmypass666 18 points ago +18 / -0

I was just making an X-Files joke.

13
Throwmeaway1235 13 points ago +13 / -0

Sorry Scully, it’s been a long day.

8
Nellie_the_Beaut 8 points ago +8 / -0

I want to believe! 🛸

15
CanadianFren 15 points ago +16 / -1

Am I the only one getting Orwellian vibes? I'm sure the normies will be even more put off by the branding, lol

12
Blackrider 12 points ago +13 / -1

Same thought. Terrible name to get the normies. All it will take is one “flat earth” type persona on the site being amplified by the MSM and the jokes will write themselves.

7
m3meMagic 7 points ago +7 / -0

I can guarantee you media matters, shareblue, and 50 cent armies will post content that gets no likes or shares, and screenshot it, and say this is what they allow on their platform.

4
Imransgarage 4 points ago +4 / -0

Should have called it TRU.

-3
RichardRoundtree -3 points ago +6 / -9

What's it going to look like when Truth is full of stormfaggots blaming everything on the Jooos, just like happens here?

7
Kraotic 7 points ago +7 / -0

I find it a bit ironic that I see some people complaining that it won't be pro-free speech enough and that there are already free speech alternatives. Then there are people like you saying well it will be full of stormfags.

It won't be both. Either it's pro free speech and those people are happy or it's more restrictive and there's no stormfags.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-2
spezisacuckold -2 points ago +4 / -6

I'm not a normie by any means and I can admit the name is horrendous.

Not just "TRUTH Social", but also "TMTG", "Trump Media & Technology Group", and on the App Store it's under the developer "T Media Tech LLC".

God awful naming decisions. I can think of a more brandable one in a second. Here's one:

  • Civilial

Here's another few:

  • Speetch

  • Magam

  • Gratigan

https://namelix.com/app/?keywords=speech+free+social+media

I can think of dozens. And this was over just like a minute. They have months if not years.

It sounds just like:

  • FRANK Speech

  • GETTR

Why the retarded use of ALL CAPS? It screams normie-repelling. They deliberately chose a horrible name.

13
OneBigMaga 13 points ago +13 / -0

Your name choices are beyond horrid. They sound like a retarded 3 year old learning to talk.

3
Ifeargovtmorethan 3 points ago +6 / -3

Stick to whatever you do but it's obviously not branding. The name almost immediately places his platform on offense in stead of constant defence. Naturally the opposition will pan where the "truth" is but they won't be able to ignore it like Gab or Parler

3
Imransgarage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Should have used TRU.

0
BoltBoltBoltBolt90 0 points ago +2 / -2

Your name suggestions aren't very good either although the whole "TRUTH Social" name isn't that good of a name either.

On twitter you tweet, its interesting and based off the sound produced On gab you send a gab, its based off the name but for a truth? you're sending a truth? the whole "sending a truth" thing makes it sound like its more going to be a place just solely for political discussion rather than be a real social media competitor.

6
entwickelnden 6 points ago +6 / -0

truther?

11
Restore [S] 11 points ago +12 / -1

Freedom of information [truth] = END

4
GODwins76 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hellz yeah.

4
ObviousStatementMan 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wish. Haha. The only issue is that this phrase was specifically said to be posted on Twitter.

1
Restore [S] 1 point ago +3 / -2

Yes it did!

50
NavySTG 50 points ago +64 / -14

Good thing he's targeting the 10% market (Crapple) over the 90% (Android). Bummer.

63
Xuvial 63 points ago +67 / -4

I'm far more concerned that Apple will take the app down shortly after this launches because Apple is part of the big tech cabal. Google will most likely do the same thing on android Play Store. This is the degree of control that the tech giants have over everything. And then Trump will no doubt react in the only way he knows how to react, i.e. filing lawsuits and releasing strongly-worded statements.

21
wwwooowww 21 points ago +26 / -5

Everyone should switch to an open source ubuntu phone anyway

51
Klaus73 51 points ago +52 / -1

Aye - so when you have a issue you can listen to linux people not explain it in terms a human being will understand.

Can you imagine trying to walk grandma through a linux issue - ive done it and its not pretty and the linux online community is notoriously unfriendly to the layman.

30
WassermanSchultz 30 points ago +32 / -2

Just set up a crontab to grep the cell tower ap to find out why you can't make calls duh

22
Xuvial 22 points ago +23 / -1

Sir this is a Wendy's

2
Quixotic 2 points ago +2 / -0

this is the best thing I’ve ever read

7
NotAPuma 7 points ago +7 / -0

Like isn't it obvious? Just sit here screwing with OS for a few hours, only to find out the Cell Tower is Down.

5
NotAPuma 5 points ago +5 / -0

Like isn't it obvious? Just sit here screwing with OS for a few hours, only to find out the Cell Tower is Down.

8
cal5583 8 points ago +9 / -1

why walk her through it when you can just use ddns openvpn and an ssh shell to fix it without her even knowing.

7
infojunkie07 7 points ago +7 / -0

linux is great but good lord the amount of fragmented distros is infuriating.

3
OneBigMaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is why it will never be a viable platform for most people.

2
Dratchev 2 points ago +2 / -0

that is why you stick to arch.

3
NoCoupForYou 3 points ago +3 / -0

I love Linux onboarding attempts.

Most of the popular distros brteak it down real simple. And maybe a little more like set your desktop background.

Anything after that it's all like WassermanSchultz said: https://patriots.win/p/13zgbm4d9j/x/c/4JH5Y9zsG3v

The dividing line between "Shit a decent Windows refugee could figure out like installing from a USB" and "learning to do anything more complex that open Software Manager" on Linux is huge. That's where the adoption problem is.

3
Klaus73 3 points ago +3 / -0

Aye and I find the community generally has a lot of disdain for stuff like actual GUI's. I find people often also overlook what goes into properly maintaining and setting up a user enviroment in Linux that you can just leave alone.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
smartergerman 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would love to switch to an Ubuntu phone but none of them work properly.

Every project aimed at creating a privacy-focused phone has been a flop, sadly.

5
pattrn 5 points ago +5 / -0

Just got my Pinephone, and boy is it slow and almost completely useless -- and I write software in Linux for a living.

3
Dratchev 3 points ago +3 / -0

well if you write software in linux, then why don't you help them fix the issues?

2
pattrn 2 points ago +2 / -0

That's why I bought the phone. Somebody's got to make an alternative to iOS/android, and I think this is the best shot. Hoping to add proper MMS support, since right now most supported distros only have SMS.

3
NoCoupForYou 3 points ago +3 / -0

pattrn, sorry to hear . The Pinephone was on my list.

2
pattrn 2 points ago +2 / -0

You may have better luck if you flash the OS with Ubuntu touch. I haven't tried that yet, but I suspect it will be a lot more user-friendly than the OS it ships with.

2
smartergerman 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah that's exactly why I haven't bothered ordering one. You're better off buying a cheap Samsung or other Android phone and gutting/replacing the OS.

3
Simple_Doot 3 points ago +3 / -0

Librum 5 looks sick.

2
pattrn 2 points ago +2 / -0

If only they could make it 3 inches thinner so that it could fit in a standard pocket.

2
OneBigMaga 2 points ago +4 / -2

Fuck Linux geeks. If they really wanted people to use their platform they would consolidate the 9 billion different and slightly incompatible versions into one version and put a good gui on it that allows everything to be configured through the gui and not some command line bullshit using the worst text editors in the history of computer technology. Ms dos edit was better and easier to use than any tex editor on Linux.

3
pattrn 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they really wanted people to use their platform they would consolidate the 9 billion different and slightly incompatible versions into one version and put a good gui on it that allows everything to be configured through the gui and not some command line bullshit using the worst text editors in the history of computer technology.

You mean like... Android?

1
AussieTrumpFan 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or what Apple did with their BSD / NeXT underpinnings for OS X?

1
cal5583 1 point ago +1 / -0

nano is easy

1
Dratchev 1 point ago +2 / -1

vim is easy as well, you just have to have an IQ above a rock to use it.

1
Bianceziwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

9 billion versions is the result of it being open source

1
FormerGraveheart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which one works well?

1
cal5583 1 point ago +2 / -1

ubuntu if you are just begining. debian if you want rock solid.

12
BillsmafiaGG 12 points ago +12 / -0

The reason I am not convinced by the pessimism on this thread is that Jason Miller, Trump confidant, has already launched a trial balloon called Gettr.

Gettr appears to be doing reasonably well.

So maybe Truth Social is blowing smoke (that’s also not the final name imo), and maybe they’re not. But I assume there’s two way communication with Miller and I would predict a seamless launch of said platform without the need for double secret “ubuntu” phones.

Whether or not it is successful after the launch is an open question;)

7
Bigly2021 7 points ago +7 / -0

I think this is going to absolutely be a massive success. The social media & news aspect. The streaming service is a little...odd.

5
cal5583 5 points ago +6 / -1

i think most of the dooming is controlled op

5
Based_psychologist 5 points ago +6 / -1

Wouldn’t that set Trump up for a handy anti-trust lawsuit that he thinks he can win? Maybe he’s doing it for exactly that reason. Maneuver them so they can let him compete or open themselves up to legal action. It’s how this guy works.

26
ColoradoTrumper45 26 points ago +27 / -1

You think Google is really eager to approve this?

27
680-EVIL 27 points ago +27 / -0

We don't need Google to install Android apps.

7
day221 7 points ago +11 / -4

One of the main reasons why android is superior. I mean apple even told you upfront it was going to be a walled garden and people still bought that shit. I can understand if they pulled the rug out from under you but man, I don't have much respect for those who paid for that shit. Yes android is google but it's by far the lesser evil here. Pretty sure google actually loses money on android anyway, at least if you configure it decently.

4
justmadethisacc7725 4 points ago +4 / -0

Google is worse because it has a horribly biased search engine+ extreme tracking capability. They have basically monopolized videos with YT and searches with google search. Apple mostly makes hardware that is overpriced. Its not comparable. Google is leagues worse

3
n00tch 3 points ago +4 / -1

Google is definitely the greater evil between the two.. it’s not even close. I’m not sure how you came to your conclusion.. please show your work.

Google tracks everything you do, gatekeeps sites you see, sells your info, helped the chicoms perfect their censorship so they can implement it here, probably has a hand in the social credit system, worked with chicoms on AI.. the list goes on for days

6
OneBigMaga 6 points ago +6 / -0

We don't need apps to view web pages.

1
NoCoupForYou 1 point ago +2 / -1

Exactly. I don't use apps to look at .win or most any other sites on my phone.

And I'd guess, being an middleagedfag, that many oldfags are also like me and can't stand reading on smartphones for any length of time.

4
CanadianFren 4 points ago +5 / -1

Having to install it from a 3rd party app store automatically filters 90% of users

6
m3meMagic 6 points ago +6 / -0

Trump could get 50 million installs in one day if the service went live and was reasonably good.

11
LugNuts 11 points ago +15 / -4

Google would never let it fly

27
680-EVIL 27 points ago +28 / -1

We don't need Google to install Android apps.

11
LOLFuckReddit 11 points ago +14 / -3

Google can suck a fat dick. Sorry China.

10
Restore [S] 10 points ago +13 / -3

Google will fail.

0
CrushDems730 0 points ago +5 / -5

Hahahahaha

-1
deleted -1 points ago +2 / -3
-1
Blackrider -1 points ago +1 / -2

And Apple will?

4
Restore [S] 4 points ago +5 / -1

Reform [transform] or fail.

9
iamherefortheluls 9 points ago +10 / -1

perhaps they just couldn't get it on google store

9
Imransgarage 9 points ago +9 / -0

Why they think those two monopolies will let them work is beyond me.

6
iamherefortheluls 6 points ago +7 / -1

People got to learn to install their own shit on their phones. Unfortunately modern applications all come in that fucking .xapk format and there are no good installers for that. I used to get all my stuff from ApkPure but now that just locks you into their app

13
Imransgarage 13 points ago +14 / -1

I just literally use the browser. Is it that much harder to click open the browser and then the page compared to just opening an app.

I’m just realizing I barely use apps for social media at all anymore. Feels good man.

11
cal5583 11 points ago +12 / -1

based and 2006 internet pilled. now we just gotta bring back flash games. fuck steve jobs for killing flash.

7
TommyLasordasBallBag 7 points ago +7 / -0

But, let us all rejoice that you really no longer need java for anything.

2
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 2 points ago +2 / -0

yeah but flash is a vulnerability and really old tech at this point. HTML5 is far superior.

4
Schroeder09 4 points ago +5 / -1

This has always stuck me too. Why was the Parler ban ever s problem? Are people really so retarded they can't download an apk? Why can't Trump list this method or the alternative Android app stores like Fdroid right off the bat? Trump uses crappie stuff, so maybe he WANTS to cater to their stuff. I wonder what percent of Americans use Android. I know the world as a whole uses vastly more Android because people in India and china use those devices, but even my hillbilly friends have apple devices. It amazes me. I hate crappie.

What are all these xapk and APK issues you speak of? I root my phones- albeit it's been awhile, so I'm fairly versed in this stuff.

1
mainsoda 1 point ago +1 / -0

The way I understand the Parler problem wasn't an app availability issue, though people have become an epic level of lazy. The problem was the servers used to run the platform belonged to the enemy and they simply unplugged them. I fear this lesson has not been properly learned.

Gab is the only self sustaining social media platform that I know of, Trump should have joined that 2 years ago.

1
OneBigMaga 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are no good installers? Download the apk and launch it. That is all that is needed.

1
iamherefortheluls 1 point ago +1 / -0

most are publishing their applications now in .xapk format instead of the old .apk.

Standard android does not have a built in installer for .xapk.

I've been using apk pure one, but its their store version. I wish I could find a simple one that just does installing and doesn't come with any other crap.

4
PepePedebone 4 points ago +4 / -0

Buckup Buttercup

27
Restore [S] 27 points ago +27 / -0

Big league.

Remember that? “Is it bigly or big league, Mr. Trump?”

I use big league.

10
PepePedebone 10 points ago +12 / -2

I'm convinced President Trump uses whatever it takes.

1
trump_2077 1 point ago +2 / -1

J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6 J6

8
MudDog 8 points ago +8 / -0

I use bigly

- Mr. Muddog

17
ChelseaHubbell 17 points ago +19 / -2

TMTG is really close to TMNT. Turtle power!

7
Klaus73 7 points ago +8 / -1

Teenage Mutant Trumpy Girls?

4
ChelseaHubbell 4 points ago +5 / -1

Teenaged MAGA Trumpy Girls. Biden's, (the Shredder of the constitution) ultimate weakness. We got him now!

4
walls4america 4 points ago +5 / -1

And...The Marjorie Taylor Greene.

5
NavySTG 5 points ago +5 / -0

I wonder where it's hosted... I'll stick to Gab. It's proven.

348
MAGAsJustBegun 348 points ago +349 / -1

This is wild. Looked through the company website a ton... Some amazing ideas!

Youll have Truth Social media, TMTG News, and TMTG+ Subscription streaming platform.

The streaming platform claims to be rivaling Netflix, Disney, etc.

They tapped the producer for America's Got Talent and Deal Or Not Deal to work on content for the service.

And they boast that it will be NO WOKE content!

I'm very excited for all of this. Can't wait to see it come out.

Edit: also, the video on their site showing off Truth Social is posted to GAB. Hats of to you folks, we are finally getting the backing we need to make these new platforms explode in popularity!

132
JudicialDredd 132 points ago +132 / -0

Finally. Some good news. It's been a little bleak and generally awful for a while now.

35
NotProgCensored 35 points ago +35 / -0

For almost a year now.

20
Donger-Lord2 20 points ago +20 / -0

I was promised a dark winter, I didn’t think the radio silence would last this long.

11
spelunking_librator 11 points ago +11 / -0

"fine, you'll get your dark winter" - pharma

9
ManateeRanMild 9 points ago +9 / -0

I think the dark winter is the food shortages and impending starvation/ civil unrest incoming.

2
user365927285937 2 points ago +3 / -1

Stocks are pretty edible

25
talltellmanson 25 points ago +26 / -1

Destruction is instant. Building things takes time.

This is a big problem with our messaging and one of the reasons we've lost cultural relevance.

People need to understand again that doing things is difficult while doing nothing is easy.

2
trump_2077 2 points ago +2 / -0

AMEN

68
teleomorph 68 points ago +68 / -0

"TMTG News, and TMTG+ Subscription streaming platform"

Creating content and content-creating studios is a much better avenue for Trump and his bucks to pursue rather than trying to make yet another centralized social media media site that will still censor legal speech.

57
MAGAsJustBegun 57 points ago +57 / -0

I agree to an extent, which is why it appears that the goal here is to become a major media corporation over time hopefully.

Something like Comcast maybe.

If you look at the 6 major corps that own 92%+ of all media we consume, it's sickening.

I hope Trump can, over time, pull off rivaling them.

One thing is for certain, since it will be publicly traded, investors will flock in by the millions overnight, and they will have billions in new capitol to work with very quickly.

43
Correndo 43 points ago +44 / -1

You said it: billions in new capital will come in very quickly.

Just the enterprise value is already almost a billion. This move by Trump is shockingly brilliant on a multitude of fronts. Dumb Leftists will flip the fuck out; smart, business savy Leftists will shit their pants.

TMTG will rival the MSM almost immediately.

31
Throwmeaway1235 31 points ago +31 / -0

I’m buying at least a share the first day almost no matter the price. Then I’m ordering the physical stock certificate which I will never sell. We need others to do the same, in small or large amounts. Order the actual certificate so it can’t be futures shuffled, and this way we own and control a permanent voice.

10
DaughterOfLiberty 10 points ago +10 / -0

How do you order a physical stock certificate

8
MNMathtic 8 points ago +8 / -0

If you live in California you can just print your own stock certificates. As many as you need to get majority ownership. Gavin Newsom taught me that trick.

4
wiombims 4 points ago +6 / -2

Until they dilute you.

4
ironmanjakarta 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like Facebook.

23
cryptoa 23 points ago +23 / -0

24/7 Apprentice Home Alone 2 and WrestleMania 4+5 for all that Trump goodness.

15
NC_patriot 15 points ago +15 / -0

We will finally get the Gorilla Channel!

2
morphagent 2 points ago +2 / -0

We're gonna get a gorrillon channels!

2
NC_patriot 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes!!

5
ironmanjakarta 5 points ago +5 / -0

I read the TOS and there's nothing about being banned for "hate speech" or offending minorities.

4
spelunking_librator 4 points ago +6 / -2

so whites can finally use "nibbur" and not be judged by the color of their skin?

3
justmadethisacc7725 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah yes the forbidden word

59
RoofKorean 59 points ago +59 / -0

Definitely some things will still be censored.

Hint: The reason Trump didn't join Gab.

36
undefined 36 points ago +39 / -3

The first thing many leftists will do on his new app is sign up, and post white supremacist shit

Then screen cap it

Then send it to some retard journalist as an anonymous tip

Leaving in the “posted 6 seconds ago” timestamp

32
Xuvial 32 points ago +33 / -1

The first thing many leftists will do on his new app is sign up, and post white supremacist shit

If the platform truly allows freedom of speech, then people should be allowed to post white supremacist shit without being censored.

18
ARfreedom 18 points ago +18 / -0

Isn't that one of the main reasons for the block function on most social websites? If people don't want to see certain content the user can block that content on their own. That way each person's choice on what speech to view and what to not view doesn't impact others.

7
day221 7 points ago +8 / -1

Yeah. Also there's no reason why a platform couldn't have preset filters (or let you make your own). IMO that would be the ultimate social media. I'm a little worried that his new social media platform is branded around truth and not freedom.

3
ARfreedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem with preset filters is the requirement of imperfect machine learning. Think of all the ways someone could write a racist post, now get an AI to recognize every single one without flagging non-racist posts at the same time.

Now get those presets to be adaptive to each person, because what I think is racist is almost definitely different than what you think is racist. It's easy for a leftists, because everything they don't agree with is racist, so filtering for them is as easy as pointing their browser back to twitter.

For the rest of us though the specifics are exceedingly difficult. Maybe a filter that advertising being able to catch half of things someone would consider racist, so as to minimize false positives, would be possible, but still far from perfect.

4
anon-dev-fren 4 points ago +4 / -0

The killer feature would be the ability to switch to one of community curated "blocklists", giving the end user total freedom which people's content they'd prefer not to see. The platform should also never remove the content, only hide it from recommendations, each piece of content should always stay available with a direct URL.

6
shadows_of_the_mind 6 points ago +6 / -0

See that’s how it used to be, block the people you don’t like instead of having someone else do the content policing.

5
Teapede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Also the way section 230 is intended to be used, no moderation will make them a platform

2
ARfreedom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unlike basically every other social media site which has Content Moderation Teams. How facebook, twitter, youtube, and the rest have shit like that and still be legally considered platforms is beyond me.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

that's the way Parler operates

you have a complete suite of moderation tools

5
Jeffersonian_Man 5 points ago +5 / -0

As Stefan Molyneux says. Hiding ideas only makes them more enticing.

3
justmadethisacc7725 3 points ago +3 / -0

where is that guy now?

3
Jeffersonian_Man 3 points ago +3 / -0

Got banned from everything. Can only find him on his website and bitchute.

8
BringTheCat789 8 points ago +8 / -0

For sure, but if Trump truly creates a full media company that can rival the MSM and big tech, he has something to fight back.

It's time we change the game to where having "white supremacist shit" anywhere near you isn't a death sentence.

Part of the reason it's a death sentence now is because investors think it's a death sentence, so they make it so. If we can get one company that pushes through it without its investors fleeing, it will teach investors that white supremacist accusations or whatever are not a "sell" signal.

4
Cakes4077 4 points ago +4 / -0

Or post child porn to try and get them into legal trouble.

3
teleomorph 3 points ago +3 / -0

well that's already illegal and would be banned on any site, regardless of whether they allow free (legal) speech.

2
Cakes4077 2 points ago +2 / -0

I know, but leftists use it to try and get places in legal trouble and shut down at times. I’ve heard it’s been done to some subreddits.

3
grapenuts 3 points ago +3 / -0

great, let them. Once conservatives stop pearl clutching over it, it just becomes noise.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

you don't think he is ready for that considering it has happened to every new site?

except Telegram

27
MAGAsJustBegun 27 points ago +27 / -0

Oh, hands down. Gab, anything goes. Wanna say something nasty and hateful, you do it.

44
NotMyGovernor 44 points ago +44 / -0

Gab is the real deal. A real genuine attempt at a big tech replacement on all fronts.

That actually held its feet in the ground against all their horrendous attacks, even including a mass shooting false flagged in their name.

25
MAGAsJustBegun 25 points ago +27 / -2

For sure, I love gab and respect Torba a ton. They actually stand for what they believe in.

I feel kind of bad for them that Trump didn't partner with or choose to use their platform, but I do understand.

A few reasons, one being the bugs and such.

Two being the name it's gotten, and good luck getting Gab to become anything other than an echo chamber.

I love Gab, but I think it's smart for Trump to branch out. Gab would be good if he was a dictator. As someone who has to spread ideas to people from all walks of life, gab isn't that place.

Just like this forum here is for us, not those who don't think like we do. This is an echo chamber too, but we enjoy it here.

This has been my go to site for ages. I prefer it over gab.

Gab is great. But they need to change some things around to further encourage deeper conversations.

I've never really written paragraphs to random users on Gab and gotten into long conversations. But here?

Happens on a daily basis. Amazing forum.

12
BringTheCat789 12 points ago +12 / -0

good luck getting Gab to become anything other than an echo chamber.

While I agree with you that this is a hurdle... it's a hurdle that TRUTH Social will face to an even greater degree.

Gab's name may have a bad connotation to it now, but the name itself is completely generic for a social network. The TRUTH Social name has "alternative" social media oozing out of itself.

5
MAGAsJustBegun 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yeah, I agree with that too. Truth doesn't seem like a good name. We shall see soon enough though!

4
kt524 4 points ago +4 / -0

Better than when Mike Lindell said he made one called Frank.com

Like, I get it, the word frank, but still, was not a good choice.

12
DonttrustChina 12 points ago +20 / -8

Anything goes...except that which offends Torba's puritanical sensibilities.

I'll never forgive Gab for all that talk of free speech, and then doing that.

11
XiJinpingsMicroPenis 11 points ago +12 / -1

I wasn't aware he censored anything. What did he censor?

12
DonuteaterReturns 12 points ago +15 / -3

He took down pornography. This guy is just a coomer.

16
indigo_truther 16 points ago +20 / -4

taking down all porn is the only correct move

how do you know if the FBI is posting 17 year old girls vs 18 year old girls on your site & then set to rain down on you for hosting child pornography?

plus, porn is cancer. get a real girl.

6
ironmanjakarta 6 points ago +7 / -1

They're all radical feminists now that cry rape at a whim.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

maybe you have heard of "pornhub"

0
DonttrustChina 0 points ago +2 / -2

So much for free speech, then.

7
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 7 points ago +8 / -1

Torba blocked me on Gab years ago, and it was over literally nothing. It means i cannot interact with him or his dev team on his own platform. I haven't used Gab since. He might be the real deal to you but meh he's just some guy with a small platform. I find that Gab feels already out of date and well, kind of pointless. After being banned on Twitter and suppressed on Gab,.I really don't feel like i miss anything not using those sites.. For context, I helped beta test that sight a year before it opened. I've moved on to greener pastures. I'd rather browse /pol/ than use Gab, it's value as a meme hub is unparalleled.

I suspect this move by Trump is going to the fill all the gaps that Gab cannot, not that Torba is doing anything wrong but he's basically doing the same thing tech wise of the early 2000's (cloning existing product) rather than doing what Trump is doing and expanding as a media group to tap many new ventures. Gab will be around, but it will always be really small since it's a rehash of something done a long time ago (Twitter). ALL of the stand alone Twitter clones and Facebook clones will never reach anything like them because that was already done, we need something else.

I'm curious to see all of the many ventures Trumps media group will branch out to. I see their strategy is comprehensive, to hit many markets in parallel. That's the way.

3
XiJinpingsMicroPenis 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you for the context. While it does sound stupid that he blocked you I'm glad he hasn't censored speech. I think you're right that Gab will serve as a free speech platform but it will be used only by a minority on the right. Trump's social media will be how we win and bring people to our side

1
NoCoupForYou 1 point ago +1 / -0

He censors users who were upset they had to learn of major security issues from outside Gab. Just bans them outright.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
11
Nationalist2020 11 points ago +15 / -4

If you want to know who rules over you, look at who you are not allowed to criticize. George Orwell

10
okboomer59 10 points ago +10 / -0

Orwell never said that.

11
Petes_Agate_Israel 11 points ago +11 / -0

“Maybe he’s just trying to point out that George Orwell rules over you.” - Eddie Murphy

1
okboomer59 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Good point. Who ever criticizes Orwell?"

-George Washington

4
TheKillerStove 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'll give him credit for trying someone different than Voltaire for once though. For the curious, the quote comes from Kevin Strom, a self described American white separatist.

2
okboomer59 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think Strom was quoting Revilo P. Oliver, an anti-Christian white nationalist.

1
MR_FROG_TRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

That's a Voltaire quote.

4
TheKillerStove 4 points ago +5 / -1

Its not a Voltaire quote either. It's a quote from Kevin Strom, a self described American white separatist, that gets commonly attributed to Voltaire in memes in an attempt to make the idea more palatable.

9
texas4ever 9 points ago +9 / -0

Gab has its place, it won't go away and is useful. They also showed how to set things up in case you get blocked/banned by powerful interests.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

who is going to censor them?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
16
Dictator_Bob 16 points ago +16 / -0

I've been stewing because some of the projects I've been working on are about to be used by some of Truth Social's competitors. Like frikkin fuming stewing mad. Was just about to post in Meta if anyone knew a way to connect with some part of the Trump org about it. Then this came out.

I'm frikkin stoked right now. Can't wait to see what they are doing and see if I can get on board in some manner.

-7
YankeeHutt -7 points ago +2 / -9

They will only let their insiders in the company. There ain't no "Getting on board, somehow" , until proven wrong.

7
Dictator_Bob 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't have any interest in working for them. Of course anyone who wanted and had a shot at a role within this project wouldn't take your comment seriously.

13
donkeyB 13 points ago +13 / -0

Can you link to it?

10
MAGAsJustBegun 10 points ago +10 / -0

Truthsocial.com

250
SaltyPyrate 250 points ago +251 / -1

Really hope they have a good infrastructure behind it because oh boy they're gonna have non stop DDOS attacks.

Edit: also if they're hosted by AWS like Parler was then this is dead on arrival. Do they have their own servers?

169
IncredibleMrE1 169 points ago +171 / -2

This right here. They need to go the Gab route and build up their own infrastructure, or this is all DOA.

61
Flatulenator 61 points ago +63 / -2

They have based IT people that will stand with them hopefully.

46
texas4ever 46 points ago +48 / -2

I thought techies were mainly liberal but discovered that a lot of them are based. They'll have no trouble finding good IT people.

91
undefined 91 points ago +93 / -2

Techie here

Nope - engineers are autists and autism blocks leftist logic

55
Bunny 55 points ago +57 / -2

Autist here, can confirm

28
pinchitony 28 points ago +30 / -2

In my experience there are a bunch of lefties that are techies, but most of them are low grade frameworks-only programmers and script kiddies. What I have seen, most heavy weights are anarchists/libertarians who reject everything political and despise current status quo of big tech and big government, so we have more in common with them than them with the lefties. Other big chunk are political normies.

11
spelunking_librator 11 points ago +12 / -1

also once you've broken over 9000 tests with a single semicolon, you can appreciate the complexity of natural immunity

4
julianleroux 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly my experience too.

16
MLGS 16 points ago +16 / -0

Only the kind of autism that makes you get really into model trains, not the kind that makes you get really into My Little Pony.

1
BoatingAccident 1 point ago +1 / -0

Slot car tech has come a long way since HO scale AFX

7
DonuteaterReturns 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not true. The Autism to trans pipeline is a real thing.

4
spelunking_librator 4 points ago +6 / -2

you have to get them young... sit them in front of a pc with nothing but terminal

6
TKAdams 6 points ago +6 / -0

fuck that's me

22
deadmoroz 22 points ago +24 / -2

Senior techie here. Very based. To my experience it's a half and half in the tech world. Libtards are just more loud.

12
elc0 12 points ago +13 / -1

There's actual science and critical thinking involved in engineering this stuff. These are not dumb people, generally.

9
Labyrinth9000 9 points ago +11 / -2

If Techies are supposedly based, why is Silicon Valley deep blue? It seems to be the only STEM path that creates libtards.

9
texas4ever 9 points ago +10 / -1

I made that assumption before but don't think it's true anymore...based on dealings with a lot of IT people. A lot of the leaders of these companies are deep blue, but I think that's also because the media holds so much power these days...if the media was controlled by conservatives I bet they'd change their tune quickly.

8
Idontevenknow 8 points ago +8 / -0

Election fortification isn't new

8
StoryTimeHour 8 points ago +10 / -2

people who run reports - yes

people who run the data/applications - it's mixed but usually the top dogs are pretty based

8
shadows_of_the_mind 8 points ago +8 / -0

I hope GEOTUS is hiring. Would love to work on this!

5
censored4wrongthink 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm going to be looking/applying for any Jr positions they might have for database admin/app dev

So no "hopefully" needed fren

4
tflst5 4 points ago +5 / -1

You'd be surprised at how conservative the tech field is. The real engineers are almost entirely men, and men tend to lean right.

The truth is that big tech has gotten both arrogant and weak in its monopoly. Their internal SJW / Woke push has replaced good talent with entitled idiots. They are vulnerable, but only to a big venture - because all of them have colluded to make the entry into market extremely expensive. Trump can cross that barrier for us. If he maintains good business practices, and a strong team of actual developers - he'll eat these clowns for lunch.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
31
NavySTG 31 points ago +43 / -12

They only have a faggot Apple app. FFS! 🤬

47
KingOfTards 47 points ago +50 / -3

It hasn't launched dude. Take time to get approval and certified on both platforms.

17
NavySTG 17 points ago +17 / -0

Hope they get it sorted. 👌🏻 Have an updoot!

25
Justhereforthefreedo 25 points ago +29 / -4

Android>apple

12
NavySTG 12 points ago +15 / -3

My sister was Apple forever. Got an S8, loved it, but her liberal hive mind took over for a minute and she got an iPhone. She regrets her choice. She's going Android when she gets a job that don't require a jab.

She's weird. Caucused for the Kenyan. Voted Trump in 2016 and 2020. Former teacher. Super red pilled now. Listens to AM1360 in Johnstown, CO all day. She's come a long way. 👌🏻

9
ronburgandy 9 points ago +9 / -0

Isn't Android Google China bullshit?

10
Jsa9 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's open source and does not "have" to be connected to Google, but most phones are. You can customize certain phones and I am sure there is a distribution without any Google stuff

6
NavySTG 6 points ago +6 / -0

Both suck. Android is much less controlling.

4
laspojd2 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can i marry your sister?

8
NavySTG 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sure. Why not.

2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +3 / -1

Expect 6 months and lots of cosmetics.

27
MAGAsJustBegun 27 points ago +28 / -1

That should change real soon, app isn't set to officially launch until 2022 sometime, beta is November.

But remember, Gab isn't on any store. We can all get apps direct from sites. But that won't happen here.

I'm pretty certain these will all be available on the popular app stores.

Looks like Trump is very serious about making a platform for EVERYONE, not just a conservative echo chamber.

Finally, somewhere we can debate leftists and not get silenced anytime we are winning a debate.

13
Imransgarage 13 points ago +13 / -0

Yeah this is a great point. honestly apps kind of suck. I use this site and gab and that’s 90% of my social media use (telegram a little bit), and both sites I use a browser to access their web page.

The app monopoly is totally unnecessary.

2
Anonymous117 2 points ago +2 / -0

100% of my social media use is between here and YouTube/Odysee.

2
TKAdams 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just add the site to my phones desktop. It works like an app without having to trust third party software.

10
texas4ever 10 points ago +10 / -0

Trump Jr. has talked about this a lot (the need for a place where people can have a battle of ideas, not just a right or left wing echo chamber). That's one of the most frustrating things about Twitter etc. they don't allow you to say things like Ivermectin's effectiveness in Uttar Pradesh India etc. On the whole our side has better ideas hence the censorship.

0
BoltBoltBoltBolt90 0 points ago +2 / -2

Personally, I see the whole "TRUTH" branding as basically our echo chamber, just as twitter and reddit have become a leftist echo chamber while this forum and media platforms like gab are right-wing echo chambers. Nobody politically neutral will want to make the leap and plus branding it as "TRUTH" makes it seem like the goal is to be alternative social media for right-wingers, and not an attempt to become a normal social media platform amongst the big competitors.

7
smartergerman 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yeah they should have nothing to do with Apple. Satanic company will take the app down on Day 1.

7
pcherry 7 points ago +17 / -10

Literally every single app is spyware, use the web version for everything, or get listened to and tracked by glowjoggers

13
tom_machine 13 points ago +15 / -2

You have no idea wtf you are talking about

-11
pcherry -11 points ago +3 / -14

I know a shit ton. Now scurry away and look up Tails on DuckDuckGo, and get busy.

4
tom_machine 4 points ago +8 / -4

Guarantee you’ve never written software professionally.

2
pcherry 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guarantee you barf nontopical nonsense when you were correctly corrected.

1
tom_machine 1 point ago +1 / -0

I write apps for a living. What I said about your level of expertise is 100% topical and also “correctly correct” lol.

Why don’t you try to write an app that tracks iOS users without asking their permission first and get back to me after you find out it’s not possible.

Also hilarious that you think your internet history is so special that you must waste hours of your life loading everything through tor.

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +3 / -1

I’d upvote this 10,000 times if I could.

2
GigaChad 2 points ago +4 / -2

If you're not on Tor then you're being watched. Shit, probably even then.

4
pcherry 4 points ago +4 / -0

Tails via Tor with VPN, like a ghost in the night.

3
user365927285937 3 points ago +4 / -1

I heard vpn on top of tor actually opens security vulnerabilities

1
pcherry 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not on tails my man

2
TKAdams 2 points ago +3 / -1

Tor end nodes are often owned by the govt.

Sometimes the best strategy is to get lost in the mainstream.

Free vpn with https everywhere, and some browser tweaks.

If you use tor constantly you are setting yourself up to be specifically targeted.

1
FireannDireach 1 point ago +5 / -4

The web is more compromised than any app. They're all tracking you.

9
Chopblock 9 points ago +11 / -2

Every app is just a glorified website. People should have never let themselves be trapped in these “walled gardens” — but we also should have never fallen for Facebook, Desert Storm, or “Voting machines”

-10
pcherry -10 points ago +1 / -11

Says the noob that has never used Tails via onion. You have homework son. Try to catch up.

13
FireannDireach 13 points ago +13 / -0

Your snark is amusing, but irrelevant. Try that on 4chan, they take this kind of nonsense response seriously.

2
tom_machine 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not unusual for new apps.

20
bigdaddydata 20 points ago +20 / -0

Trump Team: Let us help you out. We can trivially deal with this shit. You don't understand the wealth of support specifically in liberal shit-holes like Silicon Valley you actually really have.

14
Defender110 14 points ago +15 / -1

Yes, this, 100%! I run SRE teams at a Big Tech firm that many of you use on the daily. We are absolutely there. Often silenced, many of us afraid to speak out, but we’re there. We network quietly and collect names.

I would leap at the opportunity to work for our President.

7
KingOfTards 7 points ago +8 / -1

Big Tech shills are here. EPIK was hacked and who uses EPIK?

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +3 / -1

Ha that was fake. Ironic.

1
TKAdams 1 point ago +1 / -0

The hack was fake?

The press release from Epik was real, and people apparently verified some random account info from the leak by calling the domain owners and asking them.

The file is huge and is still available to download.

If you have a source saying it was fake I'd really like to see it.

I'm not being snarky.

2
Imransgarage 2 points ago +2 / -0

I remember a guy initially was saying it was a scrape of publicly available domain registration data that was being sold as a true hack. But I'm having trouble finding it now.

It was pretty emphatic at the time but maybe that didn't pan out as I can't even find it.

0
user365927285937 0 points ago +1 / -1

Good thing i signed up to EPIK using a proxy and paid with crypto. Meta af I know I know

2
TKAdams 2 points ago +2 / -0

They require real names and contact info.

You wouldn't lie about that would you?

I mean, go on the internet and lie?

-2
user365927285937 -2 points ago +1 / -3

They have real names and info- it just doesn’t trace back to the proper physical body

5
BetterLateThanNever 5 points ago +5 / -0

Looks like they are hosted on AWS: https://www.robtex.com/dns-lookup/truthsocial.com

11
pinchitony 11 points ago +11 / -0

nope, from what I'm seeing is they have a CDN with https://ns1.com and cloudflare. seems good.

1
BetterLateThanNever 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hmm, yeah it looks like it has updated, according to Robtex it was pointing at AWS as of a couple of days ago, maybe they had it parked there and Robtex was just out of date. Good to see they're not on AWS.

1
pinchitony 1 point ago +1 / -0

well since it’s just a landing page it wasn’t that important, could still be aws backed tho

1
SaltyPyrate 1 point ago +2 / -1

Ridiculous. Well this is a bust then. When will we learn?

101
Restore [S] 101 points ago +101 / -0

$DWAC - so looks like this is a SPAC merger with Trump’s group. Stock closed just under $10 today, so I put in a premarket order for $10 to see if it will get filled.

30
SkeletorsTeeth 30 points ago +30 / -0

Put a preorder in for 5 shares...not a huge loss if it cras and burns

46
Restore [S] 46 points ago +46 / -0

I put in for 2,000 shares. Let’s see if it’s filled.

14
SkeletorsTeeth 14 points ago +14 / -0

good luck....dont have that much money to throw around lol

12
pinchitony 12 points ago +12 / -0

Neither OP but is autistic (jk).

4
CovfefeNinja 4 points ago +4 / -0

Me either. Just got 10.

5
pedespeed 5 points ago +5 / -0

Newb here... How do, regular online stock account?

Cancel the request for information... I pulled the trigger and it's up 5%!!

An internet stranger thanks you!

6
ihateeveryoneequally 6 points ago +7 / -1

Don’t invest right now in a SPAC. Especially if you don’t have a ton of extra money.

4
brainphreeze 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hi, could you expand a bit on why you wouldn't invest in a SPAC? I have no idea, just genuinely curious

6
3percenterFan 6 points ago +6 / -0

As far as I understand a SPAC is a placeholder company that does nothing on its own but allows people to invest in it. It would then later merge with the real company that it is meant to serve as placeholder for.

This link has some good info https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/spac.asp

1
mundania 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don’t invest right now in a SPAC. Especially if you don’t have a ton of extra money.

That is really good advice in general (there’s a reason why they’re called “blank check companies”) but after the acquisition is complete you know what you’re getting, it’s not really a SPAC any more.

But I’d love to know who bought the shares at the IPO price…. That’s where the money came from and they’re who can cash in selling their shares if the stock goes above the IPO price.

-3
Based_psychologist -3 points ago +1 / -4

Handshake says don’t invest. We know what that means we should do , friends!

4
MeinDonald 4 points ago +4 / -0

Are you really a psychologist?

1
Based_psychologist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yup.

3
toast 3 points ago +3 / -0

did it fill?

3
FancyNancy 3 points ago +3 / -0

if that got filled youre sitting fat today

1
BigIgloo 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, about those shares! I was only able to nab 500. Looking to re-up tomorrow if there are any dips.

If you got in at 10 and out at 50 you're a fucking shark, and I wish I had looked here last night instead of working and sleeping!

2
DrewpyGinsburg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got in at ~14 holding at 48 atm

2
BigIgloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got in at 19 out at 39. Hoping options will be available tomorrow

3
armedprincess23 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same here

2
jamrs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like it didn't crash and burn. Grats.

1
SkeletorsTeeth 1 point ago +1 / -0

If only I had the balls to buy a lot instead of 5 shares....the guy who bought 2k shares made a nice chunk

11
jubyeonin 11 points ago +11 / -0

It's $10.50 after hours, so unless it drops like 6%, that won't fill. If you really want to buy some, be awake at open.

8
lordvon 8 points ago +8 / -0

spacs usually are 10$ nominal, with some fluctuation

7
BostonVoter 7 points ago +7 / -0

Its already up 5.42% after hours Closed: Oct 20, 7:59 PM EDT · Disclaimer After hours 10.50 +0.54 (5.42%)

4
MudDog 4 points ago +4 / -0

good. good.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
95
deleted 95 points ago +110 / -15
80
jda70 80 points ago +86 / -6

Truth is an English word and has nothing to do with Pravda.

22
HealthyPerfectionist 22 points ago +23 / -1

Truth to Americans is exactly the same what Pravda is to Russians...

3
UnbowedUncucked 3 points ago +4 / -1

We shouldn't shy away from using English words because some Russians lied in their own language, though.

2
HealthyPerfectionist 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll see if the relentless hysteria around it will be bearable for regular users.

2
deleted 2 points ago +25 / -23
61
armedprincess23 61 points ago +62 / -1

Veritas means truth in Latin. It’s not like the Russians were the only ones to use that.

1
HealthyPerfectionist 1 point ago +6 / -5

Veritas is a foreign word, so it's not directly associated with the concept of truth. The names Pravda and Truth are common words in the target audiences. Using common words as theme names removes any intrigue and directly suggests what to think. The authoritarians will relentlessly insist on pointing out that it's an obvious propaganda technique used by dictators and unfortunately it will turn off many people. If the name was Veritas Social, they would try that as well, but it wouldn't stick nearly as much.

3
Based_psychologist 3 points ago +7 / -4

Russians aren’t the target audience.

3
HealthyPerfectionist 3 points ago +4 / -1

Read again...

0
deleted 0 points ago +3 / -3
27
VoteCyborgTrump2040 27 points ago +27 / -0

Veritas is Latin for truth. Are you saying that the word truth is now corrupt because some commie fucks used it in the past to refer to untruths?

7
Madman2020 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is the same logic the lefties use when they try to equate Hitler using a belt to keep his pants up with you doing the same.

34
TeaPartier_1776 34 points ago +38 / -4

It’s perfect.

-23
deleted -23 points ago +11 / -34
31
MAGAsJustBegun 31 points ago +31 / -0

What it really comes down to is if they can make it entertaining enough.

Tiktok could get renamed to dog shit and it's still grow.

Just gotta make it fun and entertaining. Fuck tiktok btw.

18
basedBlumpkin 18 points ago +18 / -0

Twitter is going to tell them all of that shit anyway

9
jda70 9 points ago +10 / -1

Good we don't want them. If they are too stupid to figure out what the media is doing they probably belong at Reddit or Twitter.

6
TheCandorist 6 points ago +6 / -0

Your IQ appears to be very low. You likely won't have the capacity to use the site anyway. Let the adults talk.

3
TeaPartier_1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

If they can be fooled by Twitter, then we have no use for them anyway.

17
strawman7 17 points ago +26 / -9

Kosher Media, LLC

Gab is too free

7
ParadigmShift2070 7 points ago +7 / -0

kushner media

2
GayTexasPede 2 points ago +3 / -1

I like it.

8
OJ_Epstein 8 points ago +11 / -3

I agree.

As much as I love Trump, he doesn't own the truth.

2
GayTexasPede 2 points ago +5 / -3

Trump IS the Truth!

3
hisnamewasjeff 3 points ago +4 / -1

Isn't "Pravda' something like "Justice" ? That's what I thought at least, like "law" or "justice" something like that?

5
HealthyPerfectionist 5 points ago +5 / -0

No, pravda is a common Slavic word for truth.

4
DaughterOfLiberty 4 points ago +5 / -1

It also means ‘correct’ so if someone says ‘Trump is the greatest President Ever’ you would says, Ano Mas Pravda. Meaning you are correct. Direct translation ‘Yes you have truth’. So culturally ‘Pravda’ is a little deeper than ‘Truth’. Which is why it was made fun of so much. It’s hard to translate it for people who don’t understand context. It’s not just Russia, it was forced on all Slavic countries.

-1
HealthyPerfectionist -1 points ago +1 / -2

"Truth" also can be used as "correct".

  • Trump is the greatest President Ever.

  • Truth.

Not much different from "pravda" at all. I don't know how all of that nuance is relevant here anyway. I was just pointing out that "pravda" is "truth", not "justice" or "law".

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
cherryred 1 point ago +3 / -2

Pravda means right. Different than truth, it just means what others consider to be right. (So right-think is probably closer to that than "truth").

4
HealthyPerfectionist 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pravda is a common Slavic word for truth. Right in Russian is Pravilno.

1
cherryred 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same root. In other Slavic languages it means right. Pravo. Pravda.

1
HealthyPerfectionist 1 point ago +1 / -0

Then it's Pravo or Pravilno. Pravda doesn't mean right in any language as far as I know, and I'm Polish. Same root, different words.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
3
BIDENTHEKIDSNIFFER 3 points ago +3 / -0

I dont see how thats an issue. The fourth word in the acronym USSR is Republic. Nobodys demanding we rename the republican party over it.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
86
teleomorph 86 points ago +93 / -7

Will anything set this venture apart from Parler, Gettr, Clouthub, and other social media platforms that remain centralized and still blanket-ban "hate-speech"?

It is so frustrating that so many right-wingers, and not just boomers, still don't get that the solution to the problem and the future of real free-speech social media will be in DEcentralized block-chain-based platforms. Platforms that not only allow right-wing (truthful) opinions, but also create monetary incentives for users which will ultimately also attract leftists and centrists as well, avoiding the pitfall of becomming an ineffective echo-chamber like Gab, Getter, Parler, etc.

Crypto/blockchain social-media sites like Hive/Peakd, Minds, SoMee, LBRY/Odysee, Pocketnet and others are where lovers of truth and freedom of speech should be flocking to.

19
MudDog 19 points ago +23 / -4

will anything set this apart

Trump

11
teleomorph 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes, that is a given. And that's a lot, but is it enough?

9
3percenterFan 9 points ago +12 / -3

Trump will make all the difference. I really mean that. Consider the hundreds of thousands people going to his rallies. Behind them tens of millions of sympathizers, The demand for a censorship free social media is enormous. If done right, it can replace Facebook and Twitter in a matter of months.

The fact that Trump waited until now for this announcement tells me that this is not some spontaneous quirk but a well thought out strategy. I am sure he has tech people supporting it and attacks like with Parlor will not work.

5
hilboggins 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem isn't participation... It's infrastructure.

How do you distribute an app to android and apple devices when your banned from their stores? Where are you hosting that's not AWS or another company that won't host you? How are you getting past chrome, ie and firefox throwing messages that "this site might be dangerous" and blocking access?

1
mster 1 point ago +1 / -0

All difficult problems, but here are some solutions:

-For Android you can host an APK file download on your website to bypass Play store completely

-For browser warnings, switch to Brave. The CEO has good values.

3
Not_A_Federal_Agent 3 points ago +5 / -2

I’m bookmarking this comment for when it tanks lol

3
3percenterFan 3 points ago +4 / -1

I put in 500 USD and its doing pretty well so far ;)

No one knows the future. I believe that victory is possible and I think this is exactly the right strategy. I just had to get behind it and support it. If I lose out in the end, I will have no regrets.

3
BoatingAccident 3 points ago +3 / -0

Same 500 here I don’t mind putting on Trump

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
15
KingOfTards 15 points ago +23 / -8

Dude having neutral discussion and validation of the person is needed to compete with the fake illusions. Like here people can have 100 accounts and upvote their own stupid opinions. They can inflate unpopular opinion. Twitter uses CHICOM AI and bots and Reddit as well. They even is harvest comments cross platform to help increase the number of different made up opinions. GETTR and Truth will compete Gab is a far right radical echo chamber with no validation that fake accounts exist.

24
br1337 24 points ago +29 / -5

Disagree on Gab statement. Being against gay marriage or tranny is far right these days.

14
teleomorph 14 points ago +16 / -2

Yeah, these days "far right" just means 'not insane or evil'. But it's still an echo chamber for the sane. We need to expose the brainwashed zombie masses to the truth as well. That is the only way we can actually win.

I was saying that the capability for monetization through micropayments afforded by blockchain/DLTs is what will finally attract blue-pilled normies to free-speech platforms. Otherwise they will continue to avoid them because the 'elites' said they are bad aka "far right".

10
Heavy_Metal_Patriot 10 points ago +11 / -1

20 years ago I was considered a "moderate" and now I am a far right extremist and I haven't changed my opinions.

2
shadows_of_the_mind 2 points ago +4 / -2

Congratulations, you discovered goalpost shifting

1
trump_2077 1 point ago +1 / -0

OVERTON WINDOW

1
MrAmerica 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are talking about the anti Israel talk...

0
br1337 0 points ago +2 / -2

The only anti Israel talk I have see is pointing out that many various groups advocate for Israel to be this strict controlled immigration and citizenry nation while simultaneously working to disrupt the USA from being the same.

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +4 / -3

I wouldn’t say Gab is a far right echo chamber, rather the big tech platforms of FB Twitter Google/YT, and Reddit are far left echo chambers and we’re just not used to seeing a platform be so unapologetically pro free speech. Gab is like the internet of old, and raw uncensored. It’s a “right wing echo chamber” in the sense that only right wingers use it but nothing is preventing leftists from coming onto it. They just don’t, probably because they’re afraid that if they go onto Gab as a seething leftist espousing bullshit about how communism is great, will get them dogpiled by a hundred Patriots itching to get into a keyboard fight. Again there’s nothing disallowing leftists on Gab, but there ARE rules that effectively disallow conservatives on big tech. Gab is the ultimate free speech social media. It’s just been so long since we’ve had a free speech site that we forgot what it looks like

1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +4 / -3

Gab is an echo chamber. The problem with social media is 1 sided ideology shilling. There is no way to prevent shills on Gab because it limits the info to create an account. Stormfags here use many accounts to make their views and following seem larger and popular by using socks and bots. It's the same tactics the left uses.

Twitter before the censorship allowed both sides. Reddit the same. This place and gab are no different than Reddit and Twitter now except the views. GETTR and Truth will be less shilling and more formal. You can spew whatever you want but you cannot manipulate the UPDOOTS to make it seem accepted. Real organic discussions without manipulation. Gab and Patriots does not offer that.

8
alexryan 8 points ago +8 / -0

I agree that the future is decentralization. But there is a natural life cycle to technological innovation and conservatives are temperamentally unfit to be “early adopters”. (Read “Crossing The Chasm”)

Most conservatives will allow inflation to leave their families destitute before they try using bitcoin to protect themselves. Sad but true.

I think maybe the best thing we can do to help them is to accelerate the technology development to “cross the chasm” more quickly.

3
DaughterOfLiberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

The problem is how to use bitcoin and convert it yo cash. I bought a few K bitcoin a year ago its up to $5k and I have no idea how to use it. Tried to buy something at Overstock.com and they took my bitcoin but said they never got it. Then moved some into a wallet no way to transfer to cash or my bank account. Until it’s easy like that no boomers will use it.

3
alexryan 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a VERY fair point. The technology needs to be better. Many thousands of developers are working on this presently. Necessity (meeting unmet needs) is the mother of all invention. Please have faith that it will get better and consider protecting your family from inflation before the price explodes. In the meantime, there are solutions like credit cards that you can attach to your bitcoin wallet. Once set up, you just use them as a regular credit card.

1
HorribleDeplorable 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are dozens of ways to move bitcoin into a bank account smh

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most major centralized exchanges (Binance, Kucoin, Coinbase, etc.) let you easily withdraw crypto to a bank account. Uphold.com makes it extremely easy deposit and withdraw directly from bank account (but is not recommended as an exchange as their exchange fees are very high).

Crypto ATMs are located throughout most cities and towns, where you can withdraw cash from your crypto wallet without even using a bank.

You can get crypto-backed credit cards and use them anywhere VISA is accepted, and there are many other ways to use and spend your crypto.

2
shadows_of_the_mind 2 points ago +2 / -0

While I agree decentralized social networks like Mastodon are the future, try explaining that to boomers or the big tech reliant millennials and gen z. It’s a very difficult mindset to break and is very hard to get people away from that. Many people are still reliant on apps they can download. Hell I’m even being hypocritical about it coming from an iPhone user. Decentralized apps are fringe at best, and difficult to install (for the non tech savvy) so there’s a high barrier to entry for accessing them. The sooner we can address the barrier to entry for decentralized apps the better

Patriots doesn’t have an app but it’s a sure as hell popular web based platform that has organic grassroots growth. The next best option is for us to just make our own platforms and hope big tech plays ball and let’s the app on their store. Big tech would never let a communities.win app on the app stores so just use the website like we do here.

2
teleomorph 2 points ago +2 / -0

FYI, Patriots (.WIN communities) and Gab do have phone app formats. You just need to save the site from browser on to phone screen, and then it functions like an app (different layout, etc.) https://apps.gab.com/

And yes I agree that Mastadon and some of the new decentralized social media apps like Hive are tricky for average users to start using, but that is changing. Minds has an app and is just as easy to install and use as Facebook, Gettr or Gab. Yup.io, SoMee and Pocketnet should also be just as easy and straighforward too.

2
finalstraw 2 points ago +2 / -0

also check out Subsocial, on polkadot/kusama

1
teleomorph 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks I will. Haven't learned about that one yet.

69
Skywise 69 points ago +69 / -0

Now make a phone and TV device...

1
sciencebeforegod 1 point ago +1 / -0

Check out ClearPhone!

-22
teleomorph -22 points ago +9 / -31

There's already freedomphone.com and Gab is working on a phone too I believe.

What is it you are looking for in a "TV device"?

54
RoofKorean 54 points ago +55 / -1

Freedom Phone is just reskinned Chinese garbage with no less privacy than any other phone. You still get the same apps from the same app stores. I thought we all knew this back when Candace was shilling for it.

1
Donger-Lord2 1 point ago +10 / -9

I never liked that bitch. Conservative inc. is full if fags.

17
Athena86 17 points ago +17 / -0

Freedom phones were made in China. They were a grift. And just because of the name people bought them.

5
Skywise 5 points ago +5 / -0

So we've got a lot of infrastructure coming up but playing videos on big screens (TVs) means you either go through Roku, Apple or Google who will restrict channels based on content. What's needed is an open app environment that will allow an infoars "app" to allow streaming to a large screen.

6
BringTheCat789 6 points ago +7 / -1

Just use a Linux computer plugged into your TV and play whatever the hell you want.

1
MLGS 1 point ago +1 / -0

You can go through a Raspberry Pi, an Arduino, or just plug a PC in to play content on a big screen TV. It's just slightly less convenient and slightly more complicated than using a dedicated TV device.

67
GenadderallPatton 67 points ago +68 / -1

TRUMP STONKS 📈

7
LOLFuckReddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Exactly!

7
CerebralPimp 7 points ago +7 / -0

Can I invest with bricks and coats?

1
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 1 point ago +1 / -0

SOMEBODY GET THIS MAN A COAT!

50
Iteachfuckingscience 50 points ago +51 / -1

FEBRUARY 2022??

But I want it nowwwww lol

8
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 8 points ago +8 / -0

2.22.22

1
Quixotic 1 point ago +1 / -0

hey isnt that Mitch’s phone number?

43
dudemanbroguysir 43 points ago +45 / -2

BROOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

2
PepePinochet 2 points ago +2 / -0

LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!

36
deleted 36 points ago +38 / -2
13
Jaqen 13 points ago +14 / -1

The obvious failures are spelled out in plain language. Just read the ToS:

https://truthsocial.com/terms-of-service

As usual, no one read the terms first. And will therefore be shocked and surprised when the service does exactly what it said it would do in the ToS.

Hint: this is not a free speech oriented service.

9
KILLARY4PRISON 9 points ago +10 / -1

All seems like typical boilerplate any site would need to be in compliance of the law.

8
Jaqen 8 points ago +9 / -1

Is that what you agree too? Yet another boilerplate service? I thought we needed something different? Will this be a free speech platform?

The answers are clearly defined in the ToS.

3
BasedNtruth 3 points ago +3 / -0

Exactly.

Site will be trash from the word go

7
MNMathtic 7 points ago +7 / -0

I read through the ToS. What specifically bothers you?

7
Jaqen 7 points ago +7 / -0

To be concise: Section 8. Ownership of submitted content.

I retain all rights to my content, and license it only under my own terms. Theirs are not acceptable.

3
MNMathtic 3 points ago +6 / -3

Got it. You’re opposed to all the ToS on all social media platforms and were hoping for something different but this is more of the same. I wonder if there are legal ramifications that I don’t understand that necessitate that language or it’s just an opportunity to grab content.

6
deleted 6 points ago +8 / -2
5
tycho 5 points ago +6 / -1

I'm moderate right-wing, and I think this is necessary when people make our new platform look bad with racial slurs and anti-semitism. If it's moderated similarly to this site, I'm a happy camper.

7
MNMathtic 7 points ago +7 / -0

Personally I’d rather people be allowed to make their offensive comments. If I’m offended I can ignore or block them. That’s the point of free speech and a truly open discourse. Then again I’m more ideologically libertarian than most and not easily offended.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
MNMathtic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think this gives them the ability to remove someone for being a complete ass in a novel way that isn’t explicitly stated in the ToS. Sure it can be abused and that’s a cause for concern. I guess we’ll see how it plays out in practice.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
MNMathtic 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree with your sentiments about free speech - the more free speech the better even if it offends someone. I didn’t mean ass in the sense that they have an unpopular opinion, I meant in a way that negatively impacts the function and purpose of the site.

The first amendment doesn’t apply here. The bill of rights was written to limit federal power and the first amendment specifically addresses Congress not private businesses.

3
sfmaga 3 points ago +3 / -0

...so the left and the right can start having honest debates.

That time is long past.

1
memechallenger33 1 point ago +1 / -0

At least they are honest about “or for no reason.” Lol

1
Quixotic 1 point ago +1 / -0

gab is an echo chamber that contains no opportunity for meaningful discourse.

3
memechallenger33 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thou shalt not

“ disparage, tarnish, or otherwise harm, in our opinion, us and/or the Site.”

3
HorribleDeplorable 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just because it doesn't work for edgelords doesn't mean it can't be a good platform for conservatism.

1
Jaqen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not platform. Service. Perhaps a good service for conservatives.

4
3percenterFan 4 points ago +5 / -1

Its not going to last there, yes, but I don't think it will matter. I think this will transform the social media landscape in a massive way.

3
Bucktooth34 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's about sending a message.

2
BigIgloo 2 points ago +2 / -0

It'll be good to help conservative boomers off of Facebook. They need something to transition to so they can see photos of their grandkids.

Not quite Gab-tier, but normie tier alternative to fuckbook.

2
spelunking_librator 2 points ago +2 / -0

hopefully Apple about to find out

35
crazyjackel 35 points ago +37 / -2

Look, I have my doubts about patriot-created social medias. The only one that in my opinion has been successful has been gab. What I would hope for are geolocational social medias (the popular tab filters results based on geolocation, meaning that you get more local information, which encourages you to think locally) and decentralized social medias.

I think either of those two options will be able to be just unique enough that they can pose a significant challenge to Big Tech.

29
generated_name 29 points ago +39 / -10

Unfortunately I don't have a lot of confidence in this.

We had that "From the desk of DJT" blog thing he had, then Gettr, and now this new thing. He didn't have a chance to try Parler, and he won't join Gab. Why can't Trump just throw his support behind an already established service. If not Gab, then there are others like it run by people similar to Torba with a smaller user base that he could build on.

20
China4Biden 20 points ago +26 / -6

Why would Trump be stupid enough to put his "free speech" in the hands of someone else? Torba himself has dissed Trump a few times. There's no guarantee that Trump won't be deplatformed again. The best option is to be on his own social network so his free speech won't be at the mercy of someone else.

20
BringTheCat789 20 points ago +20 / -0

It's not about that. The real question is why Trump would bother promoting someone else's business with his very worthy name for free, when he can attempt to make his own business and make money off of it.

10
MAGADutchPEDE 10 points ago +10 / -0

Because at this point it's not about making money for Trump. It's about what's best for the movement and the future of America.

4
sully 4 points ago +9 / -5

Torba stands for whatever benefits himself regardless of who he disrespects in his path. Let's not kid ourselves. He did nothing but whine and throw tantrums because Trump never joined Gab. It's childish.

3
TKAdams 3 points ago +8 / -5

Torba will attack and slander Truth Social just like he's done to every right wing social app that he doesn't control.

I liked Torba way back when, but after watching him for awhile I recognize what he actually is.

A mental case.

1
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 1 point ago +2 / -1

underrated comment

-3
GayTexasPede -3 points ago +2 / -5

Back when trump considered going on Gab, his Son in law correctly identified Torba as an anti semite and racist, advising the president to stay away. Good thing he did.

12
texas4ever 12 points ago +14 / -2

Gettr just based on the name alone you knew it would flop. Same with Parler. Trump on the other is a great marketer and always picks the best names, slogans, etc.

9
ArkSonOfGod 9 points ago +9 / -0

I don't really think TRUTH social is that great. But I am cs not business, so maybe I'm completely wrong

9
Kholland65 9 points ago +9 / -0

I agree, I think it’s a bad name. It tries to hard for average people to take it seriously.

The name doesn’t have a neutral vibe. It has an agenda. Albeit a positive one, but an agenda none the less which means it loses credibility.

2
texas4ever 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's mostly about marketing rather than the platform itself. Trump having such a huge base and marketing flair, he'll have a ton of users from day 1. Everything else will fall into place, you get the users and the ad money money, investments, etc. follow. The stock is already up nearly 100% on day 1, made close to 10k already after buying in last night.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +2 / -1

gettr sounds like there's a lot of butt friendship going on there

1
Ophelia 1 point ago +2 / -1

GETTR Sounds too much like Grinder to me

1
MLGS 1 point ago +2 / -1

The answer to any of the "why won't Trump do this thing that makes sense and would be wildly popular" questions is Jared and Ivanka.

25
Sardogna 25 points ago +27 / -2

This is HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUGE

24
SFSilentNoMore 24 points ago +24 / -0

Here we go folks.

Publicly traded?

Who is buying shares? This is MASTERFUL if done correctly.

Turns out OAN's Parent company is said to be AT&T and lefties are losing their shite over it.

7
LOLFuckReddit 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup

5
spelunking_librator 5 points ago +5 / -0

put your diamond gloves on

2
Geyck 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wished I found and bought sooner!

1
Mattdaking 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m buying

1
ApesInControl 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the same people that own cnn cool cool

23
ChuckCollet 23 points ago +23 / -0

The streaming service, TMTG+, could turn into the biggest and most lasting cultural influence Trump has made.

Movies can be shown that would never be shown under the current Hollywood or independent systems.

9
spelunking_librator 9 points ago +9 / -0

the age of best sequels is upon us

22
deleted 22 points ago +25 / -3
22
TDAF 22 points ago +23 / -1

"I just truthed it."
"Did you see Trump's latest truth?"
"She deleted her truth."

8
deleted 8 points ago +13 / -5
1
spelunking_librator 1 point ago +2 / -1

"found a bot account spamming truths"

2
Idontevenknow 2 points ago +4 / -2

"speak your truth"

12
sackofwisdom 12 points ago +13 / -1

I hate that term. You either speak THE truth or you don't.

2
Idontevenknow 2 points ago +3 / -1

Same here, but using it in an ad might really piss some lefties off. Though I don't think he is going for that currently.

2
chadenfreude_ 2 points ago +3 / -1

May be the pain meds, but I read all those lines in Mike Tysons voice.

21
glitch_so_hard 21 points ago +21 / -0

Software Developer pede here... How do I throw my hat into the ring?

8
DarkRiver 8 points ago +8 / -0

Go to President Trump's official website and send him a message there. Good luck Glitch

20
Bigdaddyhaze 20 points ago +21 / -1

so retarded how they go for apple 1st Android has a controlling market share of smartphones.

16
Ed_Ward 16 points ago +16 / -0

It's probably because they knew apple would be harder to get access to, as android allows people to download apps from a browser alongside of their official store.

4
liaBIGmd 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's probably to stress test.

5
Throwmeaway1235 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not sure why you got downvoted, but rolling out a web app to a single locked down platform first will definitely make the bugs easier to work out, and then port the app. I don’t see a problem

2
stonerm69w 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is to muscle apple into acceptance. Will apple cokcblock 70 million pre-orders? Their latest ideas for product innovation are moving the cameras on the phone, a Tesla car idea, and cryptocurrency rumor. lol they fucked

1
Master_Wyatt_Gurp 1 point ago +1 / -0

What's to say there isn't parallel development and that the platform won't work browser based? You simply don't know because it isn't released yet.

20
Texas_81 20 points ago +25 / -5

EVERY SINGLE TRUMP VOTER AND SUPPORTER BETTER GET ON THERE SO SHOW OUR STRENGTH IN NUMBERS!!!

11
LOLFuckReddit 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yep. Preorder the app. It will get banned before it launches but it doesn’t matter. That’s the point. Invest as soon as this goes public. I would quit my job to clean bathrooms for this organization.

2
Indivisual_1 2 points ago +2 / -0

DONE. Thank you!

1
Benedict_pence 1 point ago +1 / -0

No thanks

0
Texas_81 0 points ago +1 / -1

No thanks?? I don’t recall asking anyone if they wanted to use Coinbase

20
spezisacuckold 20 points ago +23 / -3

This is awesome and I can also admit that “TRUTH Social” is a fucking god-awful name like what actual holy hell hahaha

13
DinosOnNoahsArk 13 points ago +15 / -2

"Do you hate the TRUTH bro???"

4
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 4 points ago +4 / -0

he can't handle the truth!

3
logan34 3 points ago +3 / -0

Its perfect uses language to anger leftists just like they use black lives matter, media matters etc… commies subvert language in the same way

3
BIDENTHEKIDSNIFFER 3 points ago +3 / -0

Facebook, twitter, etc etc. They all sound retarded until you get used to them.

0
leet23 0 points ago +1 / -1

Social truth would of been better IMO

0
3percenterFan 0 points ago +1 / -1

God emperor of Truth

19
cuckwhacker 19 points ago +20 / -1

This. Is. YUGE.

6
Bucktooth34 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's what I would have called it "Yuge Network".

Yuge Streaming Yugebook Yuge Speech

19
chez_blunts 19 points ago +21 / -2

Who here likes the stock?

26
Trubs 26 points ago +26 / -0

I'm a retarded ape, I like this stonk.

10
CrossTheRubiconTrump 10 points ago +10 / -0

We like the stock! We like the stock! 🐒 + $DWAC = 🍊 🖨️ 💵 💵 💵

5
spelunking_librator 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see green, I'm automatically attracted... 🐸 genes does that to you

1
Cairn 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like the stock. Dumb Ape here eating green crayons, up 263%.

1
chez_blunts 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oooga booga ape.

19
DonttrustChina 19 points ago +19 / -0

....He literally went and made his own twitter.

Because of course he did. He's Donald motherfucking Trump.

7
CrossTheRubiconTrump 7 points ago +7 / -0

Fuck Jack Dorsey! MAGA!!!

6
NC_patriot 6 points ago +6 / -0

JuSt mAkE yOuR oWn tWiTtEr!

Don't mind if I do!

18
deleted 18 points ago +21 / -3
18
blukid 18 points ago +19 / -1

calls on $DWAC

8
jubyeonin 8 points ago +8 / -0

No options.

4
BostonVoter 4 points ago +4 / -0

Closed: Oct 20, 7:59 PM EDT · After hours 10.50 +0.54 (5.42%)

2
Bball-gurl 2 points ago +3 / -1

Calls gonna print 🖨 📈😤

17
MensRea 17 points ago +17 / -0

What is the big plan once Apple says, no? That is a lot of money to spend to allow someone else to have power over you. Google store isn't any better. I hope they will not ask for phone numbers to register. I won't play that game.

11
BringTheCat789 11 points ago +11 / -0

The pessimist in me says this plan isn't fleshed out and all and there simply is no plan for when Apple does the inevitable.

The optimist in me says that this plan has been in the works for a while, as evidenced by Trump's refusal to join other social networking sites begging for him and Trump alluding to this thing for a while now. If that's the case, there may be a plan. Considering he mentions Apple's app store in this announcement tweet, but doesn't even mention Google, I wouldn't be surprised if there have already been talks with Apple directly. Additionally, the optimist in me says that this being publicly traded means it could have billions of dollars thrown at it; enough to hire the best IT engineers, enough to hire the best lawyers, and enough for Apple and Google to think twice before tossing it aside.

2
WesternRefugee 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, but can I throw one last option here? What if this is actually a trap set for these big companies. If they really do have major financial / legal backing, maybe this is being set up as a legal trap that can fuck Google and Apple over when they fuck with the app.

2
BringTheCat789 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can hope, but it's still a hard case to win. Who knows what the lawyers may have up their sleeves because simply removing an app from your app store from a person you don't like isn't directly illegal. It would have to be an indirect argument like "by removing my app and claiming it violates ToS, you defamed me as onlookers believe I violated the ToS, which I did not do and you removed it arbitrarily."

9
texas4ever 9 points ago +9 / -0

You can just use the Internet address like we do here, a little kid can do it.

2
Idontevenknow 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure they won't release their plan, also assuming they have one ready to go. My guess is mech suit troops surrounding the apple hq😎

2
Brooklyn_Patriot_76 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just pre-ordered from Apple. Gonna be hard to argue with 100 Million pre-orders.

16
bigdaddydata 16 points ago +17 / -1

Trump needs a USDS equivalent stat.

Whoever on his team is listening - start recruiting heavily from conservative tech circles. They oddly exist in SV.

15
Birimbao15 15 points ago +15 / -0

Time to buy DWAC stock

5
spelunking_librator 5 points ago +5 / -0

the best is yet to come

3
STONKATRUCK 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blast off!

15
brittany 15 points ago +15 / -0

ARE THEY HIRING?!?!

lol

15
WangDoodleDangle 15 points ago +16 / -1

Woot boys n girls. Now GEOTUS can easily reach 100s of millions.

They fear this

14
NotMyGovernor 14 points ago +14 / -0

VERITAS!

14
WakingKnowledge 14 points ago +14 / -0

It's about fucking time.

13
Forgotmypass666 13 points ago +13 / -0

How do I buy stock in this?

9
altaG12 9 points ago +9 / -0

DWAC is the stock symbol

12
johnqpublic864 12 points ago +12 / -0

I hope this is a game changer

6
spelunking_librator 6 points ago +6 / -0

this puts a price on Trump... lets show them how much

12
loverat 12 points ago +13 / -1

I got the news on this late been afk all day. All the fucking doomers in this thread need to just fuck off and kill themselves listen to the pathetic pussies who probably call themselves men.

: the app will just get banned : no one will use it because leftists will complain :he's setting himself up to lose because x,y,z :if it can't be on the app store/play store it will fail :blah blah fucking blah

OMG shut the FUCK up. You whine when people don't do something - you whine when people do something. If people care enough they will work out how to use it. If you build it they will come. I remember when fucking normies didn't even know how FB worked or Twitter - then everyone was reticent about Parler but when that got shut down they managed to make Gab work. EVERYTHING is new at first PLENTY of people use GAB without a fucking app.

Not everyone is a whiney bitch but this thread sure does showcase a lot of them. Sound like a bunch of women but unlike me you don't even have tits to offer.

11
TRIGGERED_BY_CHALK 11 points ago +11 / -0

MAGA TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE

11
Rickshawrick 11 points ago +11 / -0

Are they hiring?

10
Eyes2SeeAndEars2Hear 10 points ago +10 / -0

Wow. I always loved this place, but never thought y’all would make me rich. This was the best stock tip of the century. Soooo glad I sold all my DOGE and spent it all on DWAC the moment I saw this post.

10
OwlHoller 10 points ago +10 / -0

I bought ~30 shares at average of $33.

Going to convince myself to hold tonight.

It WILL drop before this time tomorrow. The liberal media will pound it.

If the money holds, it will gain again tomorrow. Do not fall for the slight fall from the commies.

5
Cavetoad_1776 5 points ago +5 / -0

300 Shares @ $16.

Wishing I would have bought 500.

HODL!!

3
BringTheCat789 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have 500 shares at $37 average.

I initially bought planning to sell before market close, but the more I've thought on it, the more I want to support the company and be part of something bigger. So I'm taking the gamble. Will report back.

3
Pepega 3 points ago +3 / -0

made $1500 bucks, got scared at 48-51 range. Kinda holding off for the obvious cool down and dip and to try to capture that and jump back in. Wish me luck. Anyone else already in, hope it rips for you.

5
RlzJohnnyM 5 points ago +5 / -0

$1500 is chicken feed. HODL for the big gain

Buy more if it goes down, first time in history for a President to build a social media platform

YUGE

1
Pepega 1 point ago +1 / -0

i was in late in the 30s-40s, was pretty happy. more than a weeks salary out of thin air.

But yes i regret doubting it this morning.

1
RlzJohnnyM 1 point ago +1 / -0

Oh. Yeah, if you got in late. Wait for a pull back and get back in with size

10
RandArrow 10 points ago +10 / -0

Teenage Mutant....

7
South_Florida_Guy 7 points ago +7 / -0

Teenage mutant teenage GEOTUS. Time traveler confirmed!?

4
teleomorph 4 points ago +4 / -0

Samurai Salmon

9
Snoman 9 points ago +9 / -0

Watch and see how many establishment GOP join, it’ll be interesting to see how that plays out with MAGA.

Are we all friends again now, to beat the left and save America ?

This is gonna be fun to watch

9
TheMadManDidItAgain 9 points ago +9 / -0

Registration Successful.

It's like, we're best friends now!

1
1080pleb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dang, all I get is a page that says "nothing here".

1
TheMadManDidItAgain 1 point ago +1 / -0

https://truthsocial.com/

I just did it again... works.

9
ModelMinority 9 points ago +9 / -0

Trump continues to make me richer. BLESS THAT MAN.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
Cairn 8 points ago +8 / -0

$DWAC is at $54.08 after hrs and climbing!

8
DeplorableLA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Excellent news.

8
ed_shaw 8 points ago +8 / -0

Where is it going to be headquartered? Florida, I hope. Second place: heartland.

8
BlackFaceTrudope 8 points ago +8 / -0

Bought 50 shares as soon as I saw this post ($18)

Had to be a part of this, however small my cash on hand!

5
TyTy28 5 points ago +5 / -0

You're way up then right now! I have 32 shares at $30 a share.

3
BlackFaceTrudope 3 points ago +3 / -0

Doesn’t matter, won’t ever sell, just wanted to show my support for non-woke media

8
GigaChad 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is huge fucking news. I hope it's based and not Fox style.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
8
Bobsyeruncle 8 points ago +8 / -0

I bought last night at $9.97 and it went through this morning. I was on the golf course with some lib friends and when I checked after the market opened it was $15. I laughed at the libs who poo pooed it and told them they missed out. I looked after the round and it was at $45...went down a little but we all know it will only go up eventually. We need this...we need to lose these purple haired silicon valley fags and butch lesbos destroying free speech.

2
Kavantar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Almost the same here