4631
Comments (289)
sorted by:
121
DrCowboyPresident 121 points ago +121 / -0

Not checking a gun yourself is the definition of negligence. All guns are always loaded.

But rich fucks like Alec expect the help to do that for them.

62
BlitheringIdiot 62 points ago +62 / -0

Like you implied, do you really think he knows the first thing about firearms safety?

53
ModernKnight 53 points ago +53 / -0

Well, he's anti-gun, so he knows nothing about firearms at all. No way he knows the 3 basic rules of firearms safety.

37
Mean_MAGA_Facka 37 points ago +38 / -1

Seriously. The guy is almost 70 fucking years old, worth 10s of millions of dollars and he can't be bothered to take a firearm safety course at any point in his miserable life?

Of all the BS gun laws maybe Cali should introduce one requiring all movie staff that will come in contact with a firearm to have passed a gun safety course.

Entirely. fucking. preventable

23
jennyfrutex 23 points ago +23 / -0

Adam Baldwin made a good point: there are strict rules about firearms on sets. And Alec Baldwin has used prop guns before; heck, he was in Hunt for Red October. There is no excuse. There is no way he didn't know the safety guidelines. He probably just lost his temper and didn't give a shit.

10
MAGAMAN4EVA 10 points ago +10 / -0

Does anyone have any evidence yet that Alec wasn't following procedure?

21
jennyfrutex 21 points ago +21 / -0

I saw an article that quoted "investigators" as saying that Alec was ranting about Trump and waving a gun around (he's widely known to have a hot temper). I anticipate we'll get more specific info about that soon.

The other argument that he was breaking procedure is simply that if he had followed procedure, this could not have happened. Three different people (director, armorist, and at least one of the other staff) have to give approval onset before an actor points a weapon and "fires." Additionally, the two victims were off-camera, which means there was no reason he should be pointing the weapon at them (i.e., they weren't actors whose characters would have been in the line of fire). Ever since Brandon Lee died in onset in a shooting accident, studios are very strict about who can use firearms and what has to happen to ensure they're safe.

11
AmazinKrackin2 11 points ago +11 / -0

He really despised Trump and hated conservatives and Christians. He was known for his temper and bad behavior towards employees and people never like to work for him. Bad dude.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

🤔 That part about his rant is interesting...

2
RaymondBPanelli 2 points ago +3 / -1

I haven't seen any reliable source about him ranting about trump or joking about not wanting to do another take. Until I hear otherwise I'm assuming it's a tragic accident.

2
Thethethe 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ding ding ding we got a winner.

2
MAGAMAN4EVA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Guess we will have to wait and see but it doesn't seem strange at all to point a gun at a camera for closeup or whatever.

Either way I really though this would never happen against since the crow guy died this way.

2
AmazinKrackin2 2 points ago +3 / -1

He is known for being cheap with the crew and he may have been cutting corners.

3
MAGAMAN4EVA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Was he producing this movie? Cause if not then irrelevant.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well the dead chick and the shot guy would be a reasonable indication

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
3
MAGAMAN4EVA 3 points ago +3 / -0

You mean like every other movie ever?

1
TrumpWon12348584 1 point ago +2 / -1

Are you actually retarded?

1
Thep1mp 1 point ago +1 / -0

If a bullet came out of a gun he was holding that’s evidence that he, and others, didn’t follow procedure. The fact that a live round was on set is evidence that he didn’t follow procedure.

7
AmazinKrackin2 7 points ago +7 / -0

He was not only an actor but the producer and his production company. There are several levels of accountability linked to him. He is an A list insider and he will be protected for awhile but they will quickly turn on him if he is guilty of murder.

2
deleted 2 points ago +7 / -5
11
MAGAMAN4EVA 11 points ago +11 / -0

If that's true how do they get any scene of anyone shooting? I see full action with casing being ejected. So my eyes say you are wrong.

2
FormerGraveheart 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are right, and a glance at imfdb will confirm it. They use blanks in real guns for most shots, and then non-guns and special effects when they need to fire a gun close to another actor.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
3
MAGAMAN4EVA 3 points ago +3 / -0

So use magic or let someone else get shot? lol

3
Songofsixpence 3 points ago +3 / -0

So same deal with the guy in The Crow maybe?

5
I_lost_my_password 5 points ago +5 / -0

No. That was a very sad scenario where a previously fired round was lodged in the barrel when a blank was placed in the gun. The blank ejected the partially fired round and struck Brandon.

1
MR_ROBOT1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

That looks like you said no and then explained exactly how this could have happened lol

1
Zenicity 1 point ago +1 / -0

We will probably find that he was one of the people shooting the gun earlier that day. He clearly knew how the gun worked and in fact cocked and shot the damn thing. Not only that but the woman he shot dead is married to a lawyer who attended Harvard. Looks like this case may be quite interesting.

21
MasklessMarvel 21 points ago +22 / -1
  1. there is no such thing as a gun that is not loaded

  2. always point the barrel in a safe direction

  3. don't murder your coworkers

12
KSMOconservative 12 points ago +12 / -0
  1. Seriously...don't murder your coworkers. Just don't, ok? Ok.
4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
KSMOconservative 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those are not people, so you can't murder them. Exterminate like any insect.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
8
deleted 8 points ago +9 / -1
2
MR_ROBOT1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

That last one is damn near impossible in the middle of a firefight or a situation where you might be killed

14
UsernameChexOut 14 points ago +14 / -0

Do you really think he's anti-gun or more like anti-other-people-having-a-gun-while-he-gets-a-special-license-himself?

We've seen over and over the hypocrisy of these "sophisticated" elites where they just don't want you to have shit while they themselves enjoy everything that they are against. I fucking bet you that Alec Baldwin has quite a few fucking guns. He just doesn't want US to have them.

13
BlitheringIdiot 13 points ago +13 / -0

His rule is probably something along the lines of "my bodyguards will protect me".

5
Error404 5 points ago +6 / -1

It’s 4 for most people.

Treat every weapon as if it were loaded.

Never point at anything you do not intend to shoot.

Keep your finger straight and off the trigger until you are ready to fire.

Keep the weapon on safe until you intend to fire.

5
ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

The reason I don't usually consider that last one is that some of my weapons do not have a safety, thus in my mind making that a situational rule.

1
Error404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Roger that.

22
NarrativeControl [S] 22 points ago +22 / -0

I hate guns and gun owners but I make my living murdering my coworkers with them.

20
Forbidden_outcast 20 points ago +20 / -0

Imagine this happening to Mel Gibson!

Hollywood and politicians and the media would be united in wanting him charged with homicide in one form or another.

11
DrBJTester 11 points ago +11 / -0

Mel Gibson whatever his faults makes sure his prop guns aren't loaded before he pulls a trigger. Probably has his bodyguard or personal assistant check the gun after he does.

How do I know this because that's what I would do.

8
Forbidden_outcast 8 points ago +8 / -0

I probably would, too.

5
DrBJTester 5 points ago +5 / -0

Of course you would pede, even a prop gun loaded with what you think are blanks if you're going to point a firearm at other people and pull the trigger you're going to make double sure it's not going to kill anybody!

3
Forbidden_outcast 3 points ago +3 / -0

You’re correct. Plus I wouldn’t point it at anyone, regardless.

My brain would be thinking of all the past incidents of prop failures in Hollywood. (I can’t think of any examples to cite, but if I’m remembering correctly, Brandon Lee wasn’t the only person killed by a firearm prop) And also, many other have been killed by props or staging in other ways.

I just don’t see how this can be excused. And this fucker went on social media and tweeted about it?

He really is a narcissist. And an angry, biased, pigheaded one, at that.

2
MR_ROBOT1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

"How does my percussion cap look?" - Mel Gibson, The Patriot

7
BlitheringIdiot 7 points ago +7 / -0

Alec, I didn't know you posted here!

1
Poolmanstl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like lots of antigunners I'd bet he owns several.

Sean Penn and Feinstein are both anti's and own guns. Jessie Jackson jr. Owned registered machine guns

23
HrshySqrt77 23 points ago +23 / -0

This is exactly correct. This actor didn't have any training and shouldn't have been handling a firearm to begin with. Also, a background check would've revealed his deranged public statements about shooting people. Common sense gun control should've kept any firearm (even a firearm replica) out of the hands of this deranged person. Ban all firearms and firearm replicas from movie sets unless actors have undergone the most restrictive training and background checks in the country!

9
BostonVoter 9 points ago +9 / -0

Exactly ! He was mentally unstable. We have endless amount of evidence he has trump derrangment syndrome

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +6 / -0

i demand an investigation as to why they did not have signs saying "No Gun Zone"

that would have prevented this tragedy

13
independentbystander 13 points ago +13 / -0

This exactly. He is a coddled anti-gun Leftist, which means he has no real experience nor factual knowledge on guns and ammo.

Yes, he has done many films glorifying guns and gun violence. But that doesn't mean he's ever fired a real gun (many celebrity "action stars" have not, and require lots of training to be convincing in handling them.)

3
probeinserted 3 points ago +3 / -0

Four simple rules: Don't point. Finger off the trigger. All guns are loaded. Be aware of the target and what's behind it. I've seen children learning these rules, so why aren't the adult leftists able to learn it?

2
MR_ROBOT1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need more of the story first. I can see how one would follow all those rules and still shoot someone if the person who's job it is to load the firearm, loaded a real round in it, or if the barrel wasn't clear.

7
BostonVoter 7 points ago +8 / -1

He needs to Hang for what he did. He commited murder

7
ColoradoTrumper45 7 points ago +8 / -1

Well... hold on just a second. Before we start looking for a weight bearing lamp post, I think we need to know a bit more about the alleged victim(s).

This happened on a film set, so just on that, we can assume there is at least a 50/50 on there being a child molester present.

5
sluglie 5 points ago +5 / -0

it was the director and camerawoman, director probably, camerawoman probably not

6
DrBJTester 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's not murder it's manslaughter maybe, more likely negligent homicide. It's still a crime and there's multiple people that are guilty of negligence.

2
CookieMonsters 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nah, thats the easy way out

4
zod_emperor 4 points ago +5 / -1

I know ya'll are out for blood, but it falls to the prop master. It's an organizational failure. An actor who is super anti-gun not knowing anything about guns or gun safety being handed a "prop" gun that's actually a real gun is a recipe for disaster.

I'd wager it was him goofing around with what he thought was a toy, pulled the trigger once, got the bang, panicked and accidentally discharged another round. Both unluckily hitting people nearby.

51
HoosierHawk 51 points ago +51 / -0

They are saying that the gun misfired, but when a gun misfires, it doesn't go off when it should have. When engines misfires, it fails to detonate properly. Baldwin had an accidental discharge, apparently while the weapon was pointed at bystanders. Manslaughter at a minimum.

18
John_Smallberries 18 points ago +18 / -0

I'll bet a lot of money that he was joking around when it happened, which is also the height of irresponsibility. He pointed the gun at that woman who was just a few feet away, probably made some "tough guy" joke about "making his day," then pulled the trigger and killed her. The director was right there, too, and he caught some of the discharge. If you or I had done that we'd be arrested, prosecuted, convicted, and then sued by the next of kin.

7
ViduusMAGA 7 points ago +7 / -0

Could have been a camera pointing directly at him. I can imagine a director being behind someone trying to make sure the shot is lined up right.

He probably used the person as an instinctive “target” instead of blank space around them. Honestly, prop guns shouldn’t be able to chamber standard rounds.

12
MasklessMarvel 12 points ago +12 / -0

prop guns are real guns

they would not function correctly if they were not

8
MAGAMAN4EVA 8 points ago +8 / -0

Holy fuck everyone is retarted about this today. Thank you for being one of the few people who act like they have seen a movie before lol.

7
MasklessMarvel 7 points ago +7 / -0

the media is harping on "prop gun" to make sure Alec just made a mistake

5
MAGAMAN4EVA 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean a headline of "Alex Baldwin shoots person" is pretty misleading.

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

Word.he shot two people but since he says he feels like really super bad about it nothing will happen

2
ViduusMAGA 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s my point.

6
John_Smallberries 6 points ago +6 / -0

They should just ban blanks in Hollywood. These dipshits clearly don’t know how to use them safely. They can just use CGI.

6
MAGAMAN4EVA 6 points ago +6 / -0

You guys are responding to a non-problem the way a lib would. How about a rule that cost 100x the price and isn't as good all just to make me feel better.

1
MR_ROBOT1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

Movies where they do that are pretty terrible lol. You can tell the flash if fake and the actors are moving their arms to get the effects of the action.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

Blanks are as deadly as a bullet when pressed up to a body and discharged. That's the only way this happened....he deliberately pressed the gun to her body and fired.

8
MAGAMAN4EVA 8 points ago +8 / -0

and then it went right through her and got the director. Lol You guys today are not making much sense.

0
preferredfault 0 points ago +1 / -1

I would imagine that shrapnel from the shot injured the second person because they were standing right next to the person he shot. It says they were injured, it doesn't say the extent of those injuries. It could be as simple as a powder burn or backfire from the cartridge due to him pressing the gun to her, sending parts of it to the sides from the back of the barrel.

4
MAGAMAN4EVA 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is what daily mail is saying: "Witnesses cited by Showbiz 411 said the single bullet struck Hutchins in the body, and pierced Souza's clavicle."

4
ViduusMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reports are they left a live round chambered.

4
preferredfault 4 points ago +4 / -0

If there was a live round chambered, then it would be murder, because they haven't used live rounds in Hollywood for a long long time. It's all blanks.

1
MR_ROBOT1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

With all the shit he's talked, it wouldn't surprise me if someone intentionally put on in there. Especially if they had it out for others on set.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Frog_Anne 1 point ago +1 / -0

If they really were filming a scene (not simply rehearsing as some have said) that's a possibility, but I'd be curious about the firearm rules on movie sets. They are aware that even blanks can injure people, and a lot of these shooting scenes are done one part at a time, or using different angles so most of the time (all of the time?) they aren't firing directly at anyone. The scenes are just edited later to make it look like it was fired at a person, or directly at the camera. I guess I'd just be a little surprised if they allowed the camera person to be directly in the line of fire, even though it's only supposed to be blank. I guess we'll see, unless he manages to get it covered up.

1
ViduusMAGA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah it definitely doesn’t seem right. After Brandon Lee, you’d think everyone would go the extra mile and use the editing tricks you mentioned. As a firearms owner, I can’t imagine aiming a gun at anyone regardless of anything anyone says about it containing blanks.

4
Taupkek 4 points ago +4 / -0

Someone posted that it might have been a shot with the actor pointing the straight at the camera, to show what the other guy saw. Which actually makes some sense. Still its incumbent on the person firing the weapon to check and absolutely know the status of the weapon, prop or not, before pulling the trigger. Criminal Negligent Homicide? What are the laws in New Mexico like?

2
DelveDeeper 2 points ago +2 / -0

That only makes sense if there was a bullet in the gun. If it was a blank he would have to have been basically touching her with the gun

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

the studio will probably be sued and quietly pay it off with an NDA so it just goes away

0
HassanBinSobaar 0 points ago +1 / -1

It happened during a rehearsal. The assuistant director took a gun (Colt Peacemaker) off of the cart and handed it to Baldwin advising it was a "cold" gun- meaning unloaded (so not even a blank). The AD has NO business handling a firearm. The armorer was responsible for the guns on the cart. How on earth a gun with a live round got on to her cart is mystifying. This never should have happened. Those two are with whom the culpability lies. On motion picture sets, the talent is not expected to clear or secure weapons. The armorers are hired to do exactly that and safety protocols dictate that it is their exclusive domain. I expect the AD and armorer will be arrested shortly. Baldwin happens to be blameless here.

16
SPEDMan64 16 points ago +16 / -0

His life is a series of accidental discharges.

5
zigmund_fraud 5 points ago +5 / -0

Well executed.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
IAbsolutelyDare 11 points ago +11 / -0

And two shots from either a single or lever action. (Western set in 1880.) Had to have been deliberate in some way.

4
independentbystander 4 points ago +4 / -0

Correct. A "misfire" is not the same as an AD (Accidental Discharge, which appears to be the case based on current reports.)

1
Brobold 1 point ago +1 / -0

When someone overdoses while resisting arrest, it's manslaughter and murder.

44
yukondave 44 points ago +45 / -1

Someone put live cartridges into that gun. Fingerprints?

Someone pulled that trigger twice while aiming it at two people.

It was not a "misfire" as most of the media are now claiming

This whole story is Hillaria

14
clarefries 14 points ago +15 / -1

It could have gone through one person and into another. Do we know that it was fired twice?

At any rate, I can't see how this could have been cause by a blank round. So yeah, somebody fucked up.

13
prayinpede 13 points ago +13 / -0

In thr Brandon Lee situation. A projectile was lodged in the barrel and a blank fired it out. After that i thought the rule was to not point the gun at other actors. I guess that's another rule he didnt think applied to him

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
clarefries 3 points ago +3 / -0

There have actually been a couple. But they were all point blank range. I mean, he could have fired twice. It just seems unlikely that he got right up on the camera lady, fired on her and then turned and fired on the director.

And from what I read, the director is in critical condition. So if he took shrapnel, it would have to have been a pretty unlucky hit. He would still have fired the gun right up in that camera operator's grill.

It's just weird.

Retard firing one live round (first victim is through and through, travels into second victim) seems more plausible to me. But who knows.

3
Block_Helen 3 points ago +3 / -0

It had to be a live round. No way can you kill one and injure another with a blank.

3
clarefries 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just read another article that implied it was ONE shot. So it had to have gone through her. Either it exited out and hit the director in the collarbone (probably nicked an artery) or...hell, I don't know.

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yep. One live round is what it sounds like.

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can believe that if it was live ammo. But a blank wouldn't behave like that. Sounds like people are confirming it was live ammo.

8
Xanisor 8 points ago +8 / -0

Maybe we should check who the producer of the movie was, since that guy had full control over who was prop master and what prop gun was used.

2
Janssen 2 points ago +3 / -1

Baldwin is listed as producer.

5
GregToday 5 points ago +5 / -0

Who was he supposed to shoot on camera?

5
independentbystander 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don't know, but apparently he shot the girl on camera (as in he killed the "cinematographer.")

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

to be fair, he heard she was going to shoot him and misunderstood

2
AmazinKrackin2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wonder if he was sleeping with her.

2
StarGirl 2 points ago +2 / -0

She was gonna tell his fake spanish wife?

2
JustLeaveMeTheFAlone 2 points ago +2 / -0

Do we know the type of gun? A single live shotgun round can kill one, injure another with a single trigger action. And seems reasonable on set for a Western.

Not that the single trigger action absolves him of responsibility. In any case, he obviously didn’t do his job checking what he was firing.

1
StarGirl 1 point ago +1 / -0

Alec Baldwin's brain is a misfire.

3
yukondave 3 points ago +3 / -0

I actually feel sorry for him because I am not a leftist. But then again I realise this is a trained actor and most likely some sort of cluster B nut job and has no empathy but can show emotion at will.

Delete: The pain that man will carry for his stupid will haunt him for the rest of his life. Deep down, he knows he is responsible for that gun.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
32
wizzingonwallstreet 32 points ago +32 / -0

If I used the defense that I didn't know the gun was loaded when I pointed it at her and pulled the trigger I would get found guilty to negligent homicide.

Baldwin though is a bigtime liberal donator and fat mouth piece so they'll surely charge the prop guy.

21
BlitheringIdiot 21 points ago +21 / -0

Sadly his defense will be that it was someone else's responsibility. Like Dems always do.

8
MasklessMarvel 8 points ago +8 / -0

all of the libtards are saying "Poor Alec. I hope he's okay"

21
giacomo 21 points ago +21 / -0

Didn't Alec's buddy Joe Scarborough kill someone too?

5
RegularAmerican 5 points ago +5 / -0

He didn't shoot her I think he drugged her

12
John_Smallberries 12 points ago +12 / -0

I think he crushed her skull on a desk.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
19
ineedalawyer 19 points ago +19 / -0

I'll match and raise you,

The jury should be composed only of long-term responsible gun owners

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +6 / -0

and Kim Basinger

17
Lordahdaring 17 points ago +17 / -0

Hollywood’s going to respond by banning all prop Assault rifles.

10
HrshySqrt77 10 points ago +10 / -0

This would be a good thing. Now we can stop femboys from playing hardasses on screen. Instead we'll get more Captain Marvels kicking 400 lb dudes asses with soy magic or something.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

Captain Marvels

Captain Marvel is a girl now

6
Brucesky420 6 points ago +6 / -0

Reddit already responded by banning all discussion of this

Too many patriots beat them to the post and started speaking too much truth for reddit to handle. FUCK SPEZ

17
imnotdeadyet 17 points ago +17 / -0

A "Armourist" from Los Angeles said that even when they use blanks they never shoot it at another actor. They edit the film to look like the person is shooting at the person, but the actors are taught not to point the gun at any of the cast or crew. This is the rule in Hollywood. Sounds like Baldwin Fucked around and found out!

8
Strike08 8 points ago +8 / -0

Probably raged (he has a short fuse) and pointed a gun at them.

5
imnotdeadyet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep, I bet that is exactly what happened.

2
Destineed369 2 points ago +2 / -0

But why are real live rounds anywhere near a movie set?

5
Strike08 5 points ago +5 / -0

Could be a blank with shrapnel or something else in the barrel. Most Hollywood actors don't respect guns or know how they work. Combine that with an actor that is known for being an aggressive irresponsible asshole and you get dead set crew

0
imnotdeadyet 0 points ago +1 / -1

There shouldn't be. It may not have been live rounds. If the gun was not properly checked, it may have been the primer that was discharged. A lot of things could have happened.

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

so Dirty Harry never really had a chance to have his day made?

13
TransamLq4 13 points ago +13 / -0

That piece of trash BETTER GO TO JAIL.

13
ProVoice 13 points ago +13 / -0

Is this the guy who called his daughter a little Piggy and punched a random guy over a parking spot? This isn't a gun miss fire situation, it's a Douche bag tweaking out on his crew with a loaded weapon. It's a cover up story to save him.

5
MasklessMarvel 5 points ago +5 / -0

yeah, they guy who tweeted several times about shooting people

12
JustHereForTheSalmon 12 points ago +12 / -0

Baldwin is more guilty of murder than Chauvin.

11
goat_nebula 11 points ago +11 / -0

Why was he ever pointing the gun at these people? I don’t ever point a gun at somebody unless I was going to imminently shoot them. Not even an unloaded gun, any gun owner knows that’s rule #1, treat it like it is loaded and could go off accidentally at any time, because it can. This scenario is case and point.

8
Block_Helen 8 points ago +8 / -0

If you're filming a movie it might be different. Could be the gun was pointed at the camera because that's the shot they wanted. Then it discharges and two people are hit, one fatally.

That said, Baldwin is a volatile guy. We don't have all the info yet.

1
goat_nebula 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fair enough, but even then, why have a person behind the camera for those shots if you can avoid it. This may not be possible for some shots I get it, but damn, just seems like something that could be easily avoided.

2
Block_Helen 2 points ago +2 / -0

It is easily avoided. For shots when the actor is aiming the weapon toward the camera, they operate the camera remotely. Maybe that didn't happen because they were cutting corners. OR maybe he was intentionally aiming at the victims. We don't know yet.

1
Frog_Anne 1 point ago +1 / -0

Someone above said an armorer from LA says the actors are taught not to ever point it at another actor or crew member, even when using blanks. They always use special angles and editing to make it look like it was fired at someone. Baldwin was not supposed to be aiming at the camera person or any other person, no matter what the shot was.

1
Block_Helen 1 point ago +1 / -0

Correct. That's the big question - at what or whom was he aiming?

8
mcoulton 8 points ago +8 / -0

A blank isnt going to go through someone and into another.

5
ViduusMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

It was a live round. Exactly why you treat a gun like it’s loaded regardless.

3
clarefries 3 points ago +3 / -0

Baldwin is a retard. I don't know if they can prosecute retards.

1
goat_nebula 1 point ago +1 / -0

In Texas we do. Hell, we straight up put retards on death row and execute them all the time.

10
fristlast 10 points ago +10 / -0

#LetsGoBaldwin

6
MasklessMarvel 6 points ago +6 / -0

#FuckAlecBaldwin

10
Forgotmyname 10 points ago +10 / -0

Imagine how hilarious Hollywood movies are going to be when they have to use toy guns with the red toy indicator on the front 😂

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

and have major gun battles where everyone yells "Pew pew pew!"

3
HrshySqrt77 3 points ago +3 / -0

🔫

9
debtfuelsthem 9 points ago +9 / -0

after a tearful interview on 60 minutes I'm sure he will have suffered enough, now get back to work peasants - make that 600 bucks and also tell the IRS

9
NarrativeControl [S] 9 points ago +9 / -0

Live bullet. Premeditated. Hang this faggy faggot.

8
JoabTheDestroyer 8 points ago +8 / -0

He was raging out and shot them.

7
PromiseImNotASpook 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is my thought as well. We know for a fact that Alec has severe anger issues and can not control himself when he lashes out. He was probably screaming at them and waving the gun around in their directions and through a fit of a rage, pulled the trigger a few times. He killed the woman and injured another so I'm imagining that it wasn't just a one-shot "accident". Not that the fucking retard should have pointing the gun at anyone anyways, gimmick or not.

1
WarViper1337 1 point ago +2 / -1

If that were the case then why wasn't he arrested. Your telling me the dozen or so other people on set there wouldn't have reported an actual murder they witnessed that was being filmed when it happened?

1
Junionthepipeline 1 point ago +1 / -0

What dozen people, plus only people on set were non union mostly.they ain't saying shit against the guy that can ruin them

5
NarrativeControl [S] 5 points ago +5 / -0

He has unleashed more carnage in one incident than all the fake hate crimes he supports ever did.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

and or drunk/high

8
VonBustacap 8 points ago +8 / -0

Congratulations. You finally got me to upvote a post asking for an upvote.

7
Junkevil 7 points ago +7 / -0

A maga actor wouldn't have pointed a gun at people and pulled the trigger. The woman he shot was the director of photography, not an actor. It wasn't a scene they were filming like in the crow. And I read that he injured a second person, so, uh... Yeah. Murderer.

4
SteelBallRun1890 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol we need to meme he's a sexist murderer for all the normies.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

let's go with the director was trans

6
blah246890 6 points ago +6 / -0

Baldwin should definitely get manslaughter charges. I'm just surprised at how much Twitter is defending the man or has no idea what manslaughter means.

4
OutlawPurpleHairDye 4 points ago +4 / -0

You're actually surprised Twitter is defending a Trump-hating leftist?

2
blah246890 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm more surprised at their ignorance of what the definition of manslaughter is.

6
EatMyBallsAmerican 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hang him

6
realJohnGalt 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yup, simple. His fault, plain and simple.

6
PewPew_ThaDuK 6 points ago +6 / -0

Isn't manslaughter used for accidents?

3
ColoradoTrumper45 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not like Alec's life choices are driven by reason.

5
JonBonMuthafuknJovi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed. Baldwin is textbook Trump Derangement Syndrome sufferer. He would be making a sketch about this on SNL if it was his political opponent.

4
Kaiheitai 4 points ago +4 / -0

The on-scene safety sup, if the had one, will probably get manslaughter.

The actor is just a dumbass doing what he's told.

Alec is a dumb fuck, but be serious.

1
Frog_Anne 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's highly unlikely he was told to aim towards the camera person. An armorer said that actors are taught never to fire at another person, even with blanks. They use camera angles and editing to make it look like it's fired at a person. I'm sure he did think there were only blanks and it wouldn't hurt anyone, but he still wasn't supposed to be aiming and firing toward people. He's done a lot of movies, he had to know the rules.

1
Kaiheitai 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just wish it'd happened on the SNL set.

4
sustainable_saltmine 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't feel the slightest bit bad for him. Fucking karma.

4
Ccvarn 4 points ago +4 / -0

He is a mass killer just like Nicholas Cruz.

4
entERmyMAtrix 4 points ago +4 / -0

Up to 1100 years… more!!

4
GoingCamaro 4 points ago +4 / -0

Over 1700 years... Not long enough

3
Data 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just over 1800 now, but those are rookie numbers. We gotta pump those numbers up.

3
buckiemohawk 3 points ago +3 / -0

it was needless, he was fooling around on set thinking he was so awesome

3
DarkPheonix 3 points ago +5 / -2

Yeah that’ll never happen.

3
independentbystander 3 points ago +3 / -0

True. Baldwin is a partisan rabble-rouser. We've seen his tweets about Liz Cheney, asking if she has shot anyone (as her dad did, on a hunting trip.) He seems to have an obsession tweeting about shooting people.

But if the shoe was on the other foot, based on his previous "behavior" he would be screeching for gun bans and jail time for responsible Conservative gun owners (as he will do soon, in over-reaction to this incident.)

4
Forbidden_outcast 4 points ago +4 / -0

Can you imagine what he’d be saying if this Mel Gibson? Or Scott Baio? Or Randy Quaid?

3
OrangeLife 3 points ago +3 / -0

Like DICK Cheney!

3
logical 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just wondering how a loaded gun, or even a real gun made it on the set? Bruce Lee was lesson 1 on this

3
WeaponEx 3 points ago +5 / -2

There are no MAGA actors. Hollywood is 99% blue.

3
preferredfault 3 points ago +3 / -0

The only thing I have hope for is that she was important enough to people in her life that they go out of their way to seek justice. Alec should have been arrested and charged immediately, without bail. He's a flight risk. And it's clear from the details that he committed a crime. He at the very least didn't realize a gun with blanks is deadly when you press it up to someone's body.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

with all of the studio and dem money behind him?

there will be a quiet payoff and that will be it

3
Choppermagic 3 points ago +3 / -0

we need a 25 blank limit on all prop guns! No one needs more than 25 blanks in their weapon!!!

3
neurojerk 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's at 1349 at the moment but I upvoted anyway. Take a year on me, Baldwin

2
innominata 2 points ago +2 / -0

Make him prove it wasn't intentional, sure as hell sounds like he intended to shoot them

2
kmilt16 2 points ago +2 / -0

BBC article states the prop gun misfired (according to Baldwin's spokeshole). Doesn't matter. WTH was he doing pointing a gun at the crew, whether misfire or not. Of course all the media coverage will state, "Gun shoots crew on movie set."

2
Azrael1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

has he not been arrested?

2
crackerstacker 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe Alac can now finally do a good impression of Trump in jail

2
s4001 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've met him several times. Not surprised this happened in the least....

2
ChyNahAzzWhole1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alec killa' Baldwin

2
Texasranger 2 points ago +2 / -0

If he does not go to jail we should scream white privilege.

Why can't we use their toys against them?

2
Ocrazio-Cortez 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alec Baldwin has a higher body count than any "insurrectionist" on January 6th.

2
VoteRepublicanAgain 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yeah these leftist fucks expect us to be really nice to them even after they've called us every name in the book & harassed many of us for the last 6-7 years.

FUCK THEM!!!

2
Surfsup 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why can I only updoot this once?

2
Paxelmania 2 points ago +2 / -0

Has anyone found out the make/model of the firearm which Baldwin fired?

I believe this will be useful in moving away from vague language like "prop firearm" which the media is using.

2
BostonVoter 2 points ago +2 / -0

He murdered a Woman , he did it because she was a Female. He hates females , he hates Trump supporters , dude needs death penalty