Comments (33)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
DeadOverRed 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, 6 high sounds like a new disaster waiting to happen. Keep it to 3. As for the rest, pick the nearest military base, send the Afghans home, and use the entire base to store containers. California has massive bases, and surely with some areas of already-flattened land.

Dunkin4COVAIDS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yessir. There's a reason we don't stack that high on the ground, i.e. it's extremely dangerous. I know some of the Naval bases are pretty full, as my organization operates out of some of them. They already lease space to 3rd party private entities. That and getting space allocations on base, at least with the Navy is mind numbingly slow and bureaucratic. I work for a contractor, government client, and it took us 6 months to get ~100,000 sq ft of unused space allocated to us. Private land would be a much better time and cost saving option IMO.

DeadOverRed 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm talking about a sane world where the president said "It's an emergency, use the public land NOW." But yeah, I know this isn't that world, and it's impossible, and Brandon is demented, etc.