Comments (12)
sorted by:
4
bigdaddydata [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

these motherfuckers

3
stonepony 3 points ago +4 / -1

1984

1
SHILL_DETECTOR 1 point ago +1 / -0

its literally not an algorithm if you cant predict the outputs

3
Rydanovich 3 points ago +3 / -0

And by "favours", they mean "allowed to exist in even the smallest margin measurable".

2
Medtex1 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dear lord

2
OldGreg 2 points ago +2 / -0

… wat?

2
SHILL_DETECTOR 2 points ago +2 / -0

they have changed the definition of algorithm now...from something with exact and knowable outputs to some giant "spam filter" but acting like a "spam filter" amplifies things

hahaha its all so tiresome

1
OldGreg 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’re starting to use triple speak, which is absolutely ridiculous!

2
SHILL_DETECTOR 2 points ago +2 / -0

YOU GOT IT!

1
OldGreg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fun fact: I have a degree. I wrote a 10 pager on the importance of guns; got max score.

I used their talking points against them, and even worse, used their pillars of control against them (music, movies, etc). Reminded them that if legal gun owners were the problem, they’d basically all be dead.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
SHILL_DETECTOR 1 point ago +1 / -0

besides the fact of cheapening the word algorithm by mixing it with their bullshit machine learning "algorithms"

are they perhaps saying that conservative stuff is just simply shared more?

they don't talk about the inputs to the "algorithm", and act like they dont know what is going on

what is going on is that conservative content is more popular