2510
The story gets worse (media.patriots.win)
posted ago by Doochebag ago by Doochebag +2512 / -2
Comments (197)
sorted by:
115
Womp_womp 115 points ago +115 / -0

once is possibly a accident due to negligence/stupidity Person should re-think holding a firearm.

Twice is a serious problem. complete disregard for human life and a danger to others. Probably quit your job don't be around these assholes.

3 times is manslaughter/negligence

82
fjobb 82 points ago +82 / -0

The 3 times sounds like it is not even including the fatal incident

20
ChuckedBeef 20 points ago +20 / -0

Sounds like a set up to me to make the excuse plausible. No chance Baldwin didn't realize that was a live weapon after he shot the first person. The cameras weren't rolling and the people he shot were not part of the play.

9
SWAGLORDX1776 9 points ago +9 / -0

My thinking exactly. Guns don't shoot themselves. I've seen videos of runaway open bolt machineguns and stuff - but this is a western right? So we are talking like lever-action rifles and colt single action army's - it doesn't make sense.

8
Flipakademsarepedos 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is what I’m saying!!! He lost it at the staff bc some of them walked out earlier due to cruel working conditions. Baldwin murdered 2 ppl

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Wait what

1
Cuzzo 1 point ago +2 / -1

Specious. Random fact. Unlikely the set would not have been on high alert if this was the case.

This fact would help Baldwin, though, if believed. Just saying.

2
AllTexan 2 points ago +2 / -0

Exactly what I was thinking!

37
Jack_NC 37 points ago +37 / -0

It's a hardware problem - the problem is with the nut holding the gun.

5
ninabobby 5 points ago +6 / -1

Guns aren't unsafe, people are unsafe. But of course they'll blame the unsafe hardware.

11
ViduusMAGA 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think you missed the joke…

4
ninabobby 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't fuckin know I was just agreeing with the dude above me...

4
ViduusMAGA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Hardware problem = nut - get it?

Nut has three meanings; the hardware, a crazy person and the thing Hunter does on his niece.

5
doug2 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean they're fairly unsafe lol. Which is why we put in stringent safety measures to minimize the potential for accidental harm. I'm sure you've been to a hun range. You don't have all the safety procedures because they're super safe.

Underestimating the power of a fire arm is a road to disaster lol.

Now under proper procedures with educated users, they can be fairly safe, but theres always a risk. Just like driving a car is fairly unsafe. Doesn't mean it's bad. Doesn't mean we should not do it. Just mean to be aware of it at all times.

33
mushmouf 33 points ago +33 / -0

And u know these idiots grab the pistol with finger on the trigger, then bang!

27
DONT_reply_with_THIS 27 points ago +27 / -0

Then loudly proclaim “guns are dangerous and kill people!”

These dumb fucks have no idea about the firearm safety rules.

I’ve carried a gun for most of my adult life, starting while in the Marines and never “accidentally” shot 2 people.

13
RegularAmerican 13 points ago +13 / -0

I've had to draw mine twice. Once on a Rottwieler attacking me and my baby son. Another crazy homeless crackhead threatening me and my wife in the park. I don't even think my finger touched the trigger except for the Rottwieler. I was a millimeter away from shooting that dog like Im in the AFT.

2
doug2 2 points ago +3 / -1

Aw doggie

4
RegularAmerican 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don't blame the dog. He was just guarding his home. He is my neighbors dog. (they just let him walk outside unleashed alot because he's "nice"). But that doesn't mean shit nice dogs attack too when they get threatened. And me just walking around our cul-de-sac with the baby carrier on my chest probably freaked him out because I probably looked like an alien to him with extra limbs and a 2nd head popping out of my chest lol. The neighbors were super embarrassed and really sorry. I think they don't let the dog out unleashed anymore.

2
KungPaoMcChicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did you kill them?

3
RegularAmerican 3 points ago +3 / -0

Nope didn't have to pull the trigger thank God. The dogs heard it's owner yelling for him to stop and come back and luckily it did. Because I was just about to put it down. I had no choice I can't outrun that dog especially with my son strapped to me. Also the time against the insane pissed off dude who was yelling and threatening us he got the point real fast when I pointed it at him and said "If you try to hurt us I'm going to hurt you" or something similar and he took off. He even kicked a few cars and a trash can over as he left. Total maniac

2
iaintgottimetobleed 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can understand bang! But not bang! bang! It's supposed to be a western. Single action guns.

21
DrBJTester 21 points ago +21 / -0

This is the kind of case that gives personal injury lawyers a giant erection with the thought of how much money they're going to make in contingency fees.

Everyone involved in the prior accidents and that was on the set that day has a legitimate claim that their life was in danger....

They will suffer PTSD and every other current psychoabnormality imagined and accurate.

Now you put a few people on the jury like me that would like to see Alec Baldwin die by being poked with sharpened sticks.... Oh wait he was a producer on the film too.... Jackpot!!

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I mean whoever was in charge of making sure the guns were safe should go to jail. Idk the conditions of the killing but if what I heard was true, so does Faggot.

2
HOSEQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

It went missing the day before is the new rumor...

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

Looks like everyone that was on that set was irresponsible. Looks like all of the responsible ones left because of safety issues. This looks like a culture of negligence. Ignorant idiots handling real guns. All of them were negligent.

2
keeponwinning 2 points ago +2 / -0

And he has a well and publicly documented history of bullying people to get his way. Bet your ass in discovery we will find that people were browbeat to keep up with production timelines, and safety was clearly sacrificed as a result. This is what will be alleged regardless of its veracity, and he'll be taken to the cleaners.

1
DrBJTester 1 point ago +1 / -0

Even his 15 year old daughter, was verbally abused over the phone.

1
KungPaoMcChicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I only fired a rifle once before deciding never to do it again. In that brief moment I imagined putting the end of the rifle in my mouth and blowing my brains out. The images scared the shit out of me. I guess I felt such power was too much for me.

When I went to put it down everyone around me got scared shitless because I think in that panicked moment maybe the barrel came close to pointing at other people. I was begging for someone to take it from me.

Imagine the feeling on that set.

4
dldeuce 4 points ago +4 / -0

That’s why first time shooters get one bullet. Once you pull the trigger, The gun is rendered useless hunk of metal. Sounds to me like you need to get some psychiatric help.

1
KungPaoMcChicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I was young. Its decades ago. I agree about the single bullet.

7
dldeuce 7 points ago +7 / -0

Once is a serious problem. There many serious problems before it happened, Otherwise it wouldn't have happened.

76
Biggly 76 points ago +76 / -0

Baldwin as the shooter and producer is going to get sued to hell and back.

41
Space_Force 41 points ago +41 / -0

He'll probably pay through the nose but no jail time. Election season is right around the corner and SNL needs their Trump.

34
Destineed369 34 points ago +34 / -0

I dunno. I think they’ll ignore him. Trevor Noah has gone to talking about zero politics because if he even did one story people would see behind the curtain. Biden is so pathetic you literally can’t talk about him without tripping over corruption and child abuse

16
Space_Force 16 points ago +16 / -0

And that's pretty much why Fake News is wall to wall J6. Biden has accomplished NOTHING and if they can't push their big spending bill through, they will have even less than nothing.

Biden will be the 1st lame duck President before his 1st year is up.

10
TDAF 10 points ago +10 / -0

Will have to choose to live the rest of his life as a gay man, though.

2
memechallenger33 2 points ago +2 / -0

He will settle with the families snd pay off the police. This will all go away.

1
Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't see a murderer playing Trump on SNL anymore.

It was never really funny, but now, there's no joke at all.

I can't see Baldwin as a crazy, mean-spirited actor playing Trump.

He's a murderer (allegedly), and that's all I will see.

25
Brucesky420 25 points ago +25 / -0

DO NOT let the media get away with not mentioning the motherfucker is a producer of the movie. Being a producer, he should have been well-aware of these 3 misfires and been more cautious then ever. Instead he pointed the gun at two people

The poor armorer who just got thrown into this situation less than a week ago is going to be the fall guy. Poor mother fucker is gonna get buried while Alec just gets fined

12
JLPWave 12 points ago +12 / -0

Don't worry nothing of value was lost.

8
NeverTwitterer 8 points ago +8 / -0

Wow. lol. Has that thing even seen a gun before this week?

5
IAbsolutelyDare 5 points ago +5 / -0

She's woke and can twerk, so her competance doesn't matter, bigot!

3
Lurker404 3 points ago +3 / -0

Maybe not. The dead woman's husband works for the Clintons. They might put protecting Hollyweird and Baldwin over justice.

The autists from /pol dug that up: https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/thread/344474057/#344477443

3
GarudaOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course he fucking does. Maybe I shouldn't be surprised, she was Ukrainian.

1
Lurker404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe she was a reward from the Clintons for his work. The cabal giveth. The cabal taketh.

55
Surfsup 55 points ago +57 / -2

Probably a setup to blame the gun. The "prop" gun that fires real bullets. Prop guns don't fire real bullets. Real guns do.

24
Fieldsl22 24 points ago +24 / -0

yeah im confused....there were 3 accidental 'blank shots' fired? ...and if so, what does that ave todo with mistaken for live rounds on set.....something is fucky here

10
S11houette 10 points ago +10 / -0

You wouldn't say that three accidental discharges of blanks was unsafe. He was putting live ammo in the gun.

12
DiscoverAFire 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yeah you would. Blanks can deafen, blind, or even kill depending on range. And you should have zero accidental discharges.

4
Error404 4 points ago +4 / -0

So...

oops.

Oops again.

Oh damn oops againzes sorries.

1
QLARP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah you would plastic can kill just like lead.

16
Session_Terminated 16 points ago +16 / -0

They use real guns on set with blanks

-3
Surfsup -3 points ago +5 / -8

Really, Captain Obvious? You missed my point.

4
Error404 4 points ago +4 / -0

How does one use fake guns to fire blanks? Lmao 😂

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
QLARP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol not this set, they used un modified real guns that can fire both blanks and real bullets.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Error404 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not a fake gun imo. If it hits a primer and engages a cartridge with powder... that’s a gun. Nothing fake about firing blanks.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
RegularAmerican 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not fake but some have barrels plugged and stuff. Many of their real "prop" guns are just real guns, but they don't use live ammo.

1
QLARP 1 point ago +1 / -0

The ones with barrels plugged the muzzle flash is put in post with cgi.

1
RegularAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are some scenes of films using the blank firing ones out of real guns, but usually never fired at another live human being or stuntman. But you're right most of what I see now is CGI

43
JwPATX 43 points ago +43 / -0

People who write the news are idiots. Misfires and accidental discharged are not the same thing.

40
I_lost_my_password 40 points ago +40 / -0

Yep, 100% not a misfire. The trigger was pulled and the gun did exactly as it was designed to do.

11
DONT_reply_with_THIS 11 points ago +11 / -0

and the gun did exactly as it was designed to do

Leftist: MURDER PEOPLE?

8
itpeeswhenibern 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yes

33
HikingPatriot 33 points ago +33 / -0

There is no such thing as an accidental discharge. The trigger was pulled apparently at least 4 separate times. These are negligent discharges and he should be arrested for negligent homicide at least.

Edit: accidental discharges are rare. Certainly not 4 from the same weapon.

19
OrangeElvis 19 points ago +19 / -0

I have had an accidental discharge. Set my shotgun down, butt first, against a tree dove hunting and it fired. Reloaded tapped it again, fired again. Trigger malfunction. I was probably 12. My dad's old bolt-action 20 guage - he deactivated it and made it into a lamp.

12
HikingPatriot 12 points ago +12 / -0

It didn't accidentally discharge 4 times though, right?

4 "accidental discharges" = negligent discharge, if not intentional.

8
OrangeElvis 8 points ago +8 / -0

No, his case was definitely negligence with everything comkng out. I am just saying this us such a thing as accidental.

6
refresco 6 points ago +6 / -0

Even with the "AD" you described happening, if you follow basic gun safety you should never have someone getting killed because of it.

4
WildStar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly.

For an accident to become a disaster, multiple things have to fail. The very reason we have safety protocols is to prevent a failure from becoming a disaster. In the case of Gun Safety: all of the rules are there to acknowledge the possibility of one failing, while still preventing injury or death.

A good example of the concept would be the contrast between Chernobyl and Three Mile Island:

If even ONE of the safety protocols had been followed at Chernobyl, the total meltdown might have been prevented.

And at Three Mile Island, even though an incident occurred, the proper protocols worked, and there were no deaths or even permanent contamination.

5
MAG_n_KAG 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hear shotguns are most prone to accidental discharges even if the safety is on. Ill keep my other guns loaded with one in the chamber, but not my shotgun.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
jamrs 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are called NDs. Negligent Discharge!

22
iIndianaJones 22 points ago +22 / -0

Bill Clinton had an accidental discharge. A few times, actually. The result? A butt-ugly Chelsea and an illegitimate child. Accidental discharges have consequences.

29
SixTeaNine 29 points ago +29 / -0

Nah, she's a Hubbell

16
BigMikesSwingingCock 16 points ago +16 / -0

Chubbell

15
BadManOrange 15 points ago +15 / -0

Chelsea isn't his.

15
grenades_and_ham 15 points ago +15 / -0

Don't forget Danney Williams!

8
TDAF 8 points ago +8 / -0

Say his name!

5
Jimmyjetfuel 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let's not forget a stained blue dress!

3
VinceFoster101 3 points ago +3 / -0

As the Clinton's personal attorney, I cannot give you a yes or no answer to this statement... unless I am supenea'd to testify without attorney-client privilege next month, in which case I will comply with the court order.

20
Kerra_Holt 20 points ago +20 / -0

Prop guns. You know, those purposefully disabled guns incapable of loading or firing anything. Those guns without firing pins. They're just... going off at random now.

10
TommyJarvis 10 points ago +11 / -1

The gun didn’t “misfire”, that’s fucking retarded. Baldwin is an alcoholic retard, and he pointed the gun and fired it at two different people on purpose.

When have you ever picked up a modern gun and it just “went off” without you pulling the trigger?

2
RegularAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

Are we counting SIGs? Lol jk

1
EdBuck 1 point ago +1 / -0

Not all alcoholics are retards...

4
Plsdontfireme 4 points ago +4 / -0

Maybe because its a western they were using a revolver and wanted bullets in each cylinder visible. Probably don't know you can load a cartridge with out powder.

3
Herefordamemesss 3 points ago +3 / -0

A prop gun refers to a gun provided by the amorer from the props dept.

It could be rubber, it could have a barrel plugged, or it could be a completely functional gun.

They’re still all prop guns.

2
Space_Force 2 points ago +2 / -0

Many of my prop guns shoot 1 MOA.

16
TommyJarvis 16 points ago +16 / -0

BULLSHIT

This is an attempt to deflect blame from Baldwin. He pointed the gun and pulled the trigger at two different people who weren’t even actors in a scene involving the gun. Don’t believe anything Fake News LA Times say a about this!

3
LibertyorDeath1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think he fired once. The bullet went through the abdomen of the first person and hit the person behind her.

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why did he do that if they weren't acting in a scene? Was he dicking around?

1
AJoeDD 1 point ago +1 / -0

You could hypothesize the scene is the camera having a PoV from whatever distance facing the shooter. Not sure how likely that is. I haven't seen it in movies that I can remember.

1
HOSEQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

The second one got hit in the shoulder...

What does that say???

15
CTGunner82 15 points ago +15 / -0

Negligent, the term is negligent discharge

6
TommyJarvis 6 points ago +6 / -0

OR Baldwin aimed and fired the gun twice.

What else is there?

10
EatMyBallsAmerican 10 points ago +10 / -0

watch this is going to be a false flag. This will be dismissed as no charges, because it was an accident because of corrupt Dem players trying to get some pissed of conservative to pop off.

3
I_lost_my_password 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's still at minimum manslaughter. If no one is charged, shit will hit the fan big time.

2
terrapin1234 2 points ago +2 / -0

Alec is a bigtime leftist TDS sufferer, and part of the elite establishment. This will end in a payout for the victims family. Baldwin won't face any jail time at all under this administration. The only shit to hit the fan will be the acceleration of the gun control narrative that this will predictably spin into.

2
RegularAmerican 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not all accidents are manslaughter. If he can make the case he was totally ignorant. Which shouldn't be hard for a man like Baldwin. He will walk. Pay a settlement to the family. And go on lecturing us about how we need to have OUR guns taken away because he's a fucking idiot

2
HOSEQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

In New Mexico, it does not matter....

He can claim total ignorance of anything he wants to claim.....

HE still pulled the trigger, he is still the Producer, and he is still the top person responsible for the guns, regardless of the Armorer....

And he has been around guns long enough to know that he needed to check his own for safety, BEFORE pulling the trigger...

1
RegularAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not gonna argue whether or not Baldwin is responsible. Of course he is. I'm saying he won't be held accountable the way you or I would. That Is a fact

1
HOSEQ 1 point ago +1 / -0

If not, it is directly due to the DA, and her connections....

1
RegularAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

So do you think that's out of the realm of not only possiblity, but likelihood?

2
HOSEQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm implying that the DA, being a Lasbian, that's ""married"" to a Lesbian Ex-cop, is going to have some connections to some really shady characters....

The FACT that there are three easy to prove cases that went unpunished in SFe County, due to some 26 Point Bulletin that SHE put out for the cops to use, in collecting Evidence and proof, is part of the plan to allow people to get away with Murder....

I'm not going to exclude the fact that lots of SFe cops are incompetent either....

NM Cops tend to spend soo much time doing DUI Checks that it isn't even funny anymore, and so they become stupid when it comes to Real Crimes...

Baldwin just might walk, and more than likely the Armorer might get convicted....

But it isn't due to the Laws in place, but to a lack of competence in the Police doing the investigating, the DAs Leftist Views, and because of her Connections to other Leftists, and who knows how far those reach.....

1
penguinjay1212 1 point ago +1 / -0

idk why people are pretending this was an accident.

this was a hit, made to look like an accident with additional discharges planned prior to the event.

The crew he was set to pin it on WALKED OFF SET, due to being smart about the two separate "accidental" discharges.

Mr Union, anti gun-"man," Baldwin hired scabs and then made the hit anyway.

Hope the investigation is not all coverup. Much much much more than meets the eye here.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Um I won't pop off about this? One less faggy jew propagandist, o noooo

1
EatMyBallsAmerican 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats the point, we wont.

8
grenades_and_ham 8 points ago +8 / -0

Sounds like it's a human problem and not any type of weapons malfunction. Weapons don't just go off sitting unattended. During the course of its use, you may have a weapon malfunction that can result in injury but that weapon and the ammunition should have been pulled and sent to an actual armorer/gunsmith for investigation.

This whole incident just reeks of incompetence and poor safety practices.

Oh, and fuck Alec Baldwin!

8
uniformist 8 points ago +8 / -0

"misfire" my ass ... they were careless/negligent discharges. Someone pulled the trigger in each case.

3
CuzzinRicky 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep in mind it was a vintage Colt from the 1800's. Not as safe as your gen 4 Glock.

2
HOSEQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was a Replica, and much safer than the originals...

2
FinishTheBorderWall 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like he pointed it at them intentionally and pulled the trigger intentionally. Perhaps he thought it contained a prop or gimmicked round. Still, there is not excuse, especially after what happened in The Crow movie. This is reckless homicide at the minimum and he will probably spend the rest of his life in prison.

-1
doug2 -1 points ago +1 / -2

What happened on the crow movie? Did the crows peck someone to death?

8
MichellesSausage 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is so much bullshit... Alec Baldwin has no idea how to handle a firearm , no idea how to clear the chamber or even check if a round contains a bullet, no idea how to check if the barrel is clear of obstructions... Yet this overpaid shitbag will tell you what constitutional rights are allowed for you, what property you are allowed to own, and how you should protect your family. These pedos are just simply dumb fucks that can only pretend to be somebody.

6
TyrannyBuster 6 points ago +6 / -0

HELLO MORON: Misfire means it DID NOT discharge. These people know nothing about guns.

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol it does? So they should say "accidental discharge," right? Assuming the faggot did it on accident

5
IWantFweedom 5 points ago +5 / -0

The word misfire means the gun doesn't discharge at all when the primer is struck. If the firearms discharged, then the tweet contradicts itself. As a "journalist" it is the author's responsibility to ensure the correct words are used to describe events. Using the wrong words in an effort to sugar-coat the truth is deceptive and discredits their "news" organization.

5
ChilledCovfefe 5 points ago +5 / -0

What amazes me is that if you have a gun that fires real bullets, that is a GUN. You don’t point a gun at anyone anytime even if you are 100% sure it is unloaded unless you are in a defense situation.

Movies should not be using real guns, they should be using props that only shoot blanks that a real bullet would never fit in.

2
ThunderInYourHeart 2 points ago +2 / -0

I must have missed something overnight. The gun was loaded with real bullets?

Also, it’s a Hollywood movie set. Can’t they just point the guns in a safe direction and pretend like they’re aiming? Even with a blank, just pointing it at someone breaks that cardinal rule.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Na bro, blanks can be fatal. If the barrel has clogged debris from prior firings it can discharge that debris and be fatal.

5
imnotdeadyet 5 points ago +5 / -0

The key point that is not being addressed is the actor never points a gun (blanks or not) at another actor or crew. They edit the film to make it look like they are shooting at someone, but they have a mark on the ground they are suppose to stand and fire in a direction where there are no people. This idiot broke the rules and pointed the gun at a person and fired. Even if it was a blank round, it could hurt someone. He broke the rules and killed someone. This is reckless homicide.

3
dldeuce 3 points ago +3 / -0

There’s more to it than that. I agree with you about Alec Baldwin. However more people are involved in this. For example I’ve been hearing the term “cold gun.” If they’re using that phrase, that’s a culture of negligence. This may go farther than just the individuals on the set and may be a cultural thing within the industry. Just like with a lot of other deadly incidents I hope they don’t have too narrow of a focus with blame being the objective

4
kag_WI 4 points ago +4 / -0

“Prop gun” that can shoot live ammunition? I don’t think they know what “prop” means.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bra. Prop gun doesnt mean fake. It means a gun, that is being used as a prop. It can be real, usually are. Do you know what a blank is? Sometimes the barrels get clogged up and the blanks launch that shit. They should be doing safety checks before but clearly didn't. Faggots. Faggots all around.

3
GarudaOne 3 points ago +3 / -0

TTAG already confirmed it was a real gun with a real live round in it, the "prop gun" claim is bullshit being made up by the MSM.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

So he just murdered someone straight up? Lol

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not buying that some random debris in the barrel fully penetrates a person And then enters a second person. That sounds like a bullet, not debris.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Good point

4
Gunslinger1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is an effort to blame the gun. A gun doesn’t “misfire” unless the trigger is pulled BY A PERSON. And that person had the gun pointed in an unsafe direction. On-set protocol, even in firearms loaded with blanks, is always point them in a safe direction and never directly at another actor or crew member.

1
doug2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Really? Are you sure about this? I've seen plenty of propaganda pieces where they are aiming at eachother and shooting

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
4
Fieldsl22 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lemme get this straight, there were 3 prior "prop gun' accidents or real gun accidents'....thanks anyone. (?)

4
Bullet3250 4 points ago +4 / -0

Everyone on the set should go to an NRA Gun safety class... everyone should shoot REAL GUNS... and then they would handle every gun... even prop guns... properly.

4
JohnnySkidmarx 4 points ago +4 / -0

How many people was Baldwin trying to kill on this set?

4
dagoat4l 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like Alec knew guns was dangerous and used them anyways. He knew guns kill people. We got to ban all guns in Hollywood. They kill people. Lock this gun and Alec up.

3
dldeuce 3 points ago +3 / -0

What exactly is this “cold gun” concept I’ve been hearing? The Assistant Director supposedly handed him a loaded gun saying here’s a “cold gun.”

That right there is a culture of negligence. There is no such thing as a “cold gun.” Anyone that used that phrase, heard that phrase, or had anything to do with being around people handling guns that way was part of the negligence.

3
Brickyard 3 points ago +3 / -0

Prop gun misfire....

People that use that phrase are demonstrating they have absolutely no idea what they’re talking about.

3
WVboi 3 points ago +3 / -0

I don't think the founding fathers had so many retards/commies in mind when they wrote the 2nd amendment.

3
Helena 3 points ago +4 / -1

"accidental" Sounds more like Alec was just employing the "practice makes perfect" ideal.

2
Helena 2 points ago +3 / -1

He was probably super pissed about the failure of those first three times.

3
Bluestorm83 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not "Prop Gun." Just GUN. If it fires Bullets when you pull the Trigger, it is a fucking GUN.

3
MichellesSausage 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why are rounds with bullets being used in a prop gun?

3
Space_Force 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dipshit Hollywood pedos that don't know the first thing about guns, handling guns.

Sounds like it was a real gun that was supposed to have only blanks. Somebody done fucked up.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
Aluminoti 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want to see this fucktard go to jail but I won't hold my breath

3
rextexMG 3 points ago +3 / -0

What do they mean accidental discharge? Is someone pulling the trigger or not?

2
doug2 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it means he didn't want to shoot a projectile. What's the right term? Not misfire. Not accidental discharge. Idk.

Other than murder lol

3
SurrenderFreeman 3 points ago +3 / -0

The "Armorur" was a diversity hire

2
Bogey 2 points ago +2 / -0

A negligent discharge gets someone kicked off a range. Did they stop, assess, and remove the problem?

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

Culture of negligence

2
AgentGTO 2 points ago +2 / -0

From what I've read, that same firearm had 2 prior discharge incidents the week prior. Where the gun went off despite the person just holding it. Assuming that's true, then you can tell you're dealing with morons because GUNS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO DO THAT, yet they continued using it. If I ever had a gun that discharged by itself for the 2nd time, that thing would have been disassembled in a heart beat and if I couldn't figure out what the problem was, I would be shipping it to the manufacture to have them fix it. I would never just keep using it like, huh that was weird, hopefully it doesn't happen again.

2
Rustybutt 2 points ago +2 / -0

Am I missing something? Why are people putting live rounds into weapons used in movies, what purpose does that serve? I get blanks, they make the same noise and maybe dangerous a few feet in front of the gun.

2
HOSEQ 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is no such thing as an """ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE"""....

There is Trigger Discipline, and you either have Good Trigger Discipline or Bad Trigger Discipline....

Bad TD = guns going off when they are not supposed to....

Good TD = Guns going off ONLY when they are supposed to...

Bad TD is someone playing with a gun as if it were a TOY....

Accidental Discharges means that they had people playing with Guns, being very Irresponsible, and had ZERO Good Trigger Discipline in the right direction.....

2
YN31964 2 points ago +2 / -0

Does anyone know the last time Dickhead Baldwin was sober?

2
DocOneToo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Did anyone, at any time, ever think to unload the fuckin gun after the first ND? And what genius brought live rounds? And what genius thought a real gun capable of real fire is acceptable as a prop gun?

2
Kaboola 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is starting to look so over the top negligence and unprofessional that I'm starting to believe the misfire was on purpose made to look accidental

1
dldeuce 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me it’s looking more like a culture of negligence in handling guns. That’s how a lot of people get killed with guns. They are surrounded by ignorant idiots breaking the rules and they become accustomed to it. Then the inevitable happens. If not just one person’s fault.

2
BasedNtruth 2 points ago +2 / -0

This story is the most retarded distraction ever.

Brb NIH admits to funding bioweapon research IN CHINA

brb LOOK OVER HERE! Baldwin killed someone with a movie gun!

2
Cuzzo 2 points ago +2 / -0

But better for Baldwin??

Idk. Hold up. Why had we not heard about it?

This “fact” helps Baldwin by suggesting that others were having similar issues, or some such.

The presence of the text message could also be used as evidence of planning, and malice aforethought, depending on certain additional facts.

2
Space_Force 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounding more and more like it was a real firearm with live ammo.

2
RonBohr 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bullshit. Setting up the spin to blame the gun.

2
one_cool 2 points ago +2 / -0

i knew some leftist types who went to south america. They came back and talked about how the locals were trash and it was they had no respect for the laws there. You get some anti gun leftists out of their blue cities and put them in a rural situation, give them guns they will handle them dangerously like those gay methheads in tiger king. Because they are antigun they will treat them as toys out of disrespect.

Although personally i think Baldwin wanted to murded and get away with it.

2
DaemonKrog 2 points ago +2 / -0

"Accidental"

Fucking Alec Baldwin probably keeps his finger on the trigger at all times.

2
dldeuce 2 points ago +2 / -0

If he did that on a movie set for all to see and no one did anything about it, it’s not just one person responsible.

2
Jamahawk 2 points ago +2 / -0

Leave it to the liars in the media to equate a misfire with an accidental discharge.

2
Brellin 2 points ago +2 / -0

How is it a "prop gun" if it can fire bullets? Prop guns are made out of plastic to resemble real guns and cannot fire bullets because they literally don't have the mechanisms to do so. These incidents were not caused by "prop guns" going off, they were caused by someone using a REAL gun in an unsafe manner.

2
Faintlight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Check out this twitter feed: https://twitter.com/DarnelSugarfoo

"From Reuters:

The woman killed by Alec Baldwin was the wife of an attorney with the law firm of Latham & Watkins.

And who is one of Latham & Watkins clients?

Michael Sussman; the Clinton connected atty just indicted by Bob Durham. "

"THIS IS WEIRD.

The Asst. Director handed the loaded gun to Alec Baldwin.

The Asst. Director is Dave Halls.

Dave Halls was the Asst. Director on "The Crow: Salvation."

"The Crow: Salvation" was the sequel to "The Crow," where Brandon Lee was also killed by a prop gun."

2
Snooptwo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Imagine 3 accidental misfires and still using the gun. As I’ve said before, we don’t have a gun problem, we have a democrat problem.