2527
Comments (179)
sorted by:
109
MarcusAurelius 109 points ago +109 / -0

And this is what the endgame is.

41
entwickelnden 41 points ago +41 / -0

2030 only 9 years away, if they apply this on houses it wont take but 1-2 years to lose a house.

29
NomadicKrow2 29 points ago +29 / -0

Well, I won't ever see it. I'll fight to keep my house. My investments are my risk. If I take a risk and make a gain, I don't see how the government is entitled to any of that. If my house appreciates in value, how is the government entitled to any of that value? This is ludicrous. "Unrealized gain" is fucking stupid, it's a bullshit term. It doesn't mean anything. I might sell my house for a fucking dollar, it doesn't matter if some asshole appraises it for 100k.

21
80960KA 21 points ago +22 / -1

I will put any banker or govt rep that shows up at my door to take my house over scam taxes in a shallow grave.

10
davidmode 10 points ago +10 / -0

Dont waste timing digging holes. Graves are for people, commies rot in sun.

5
BillionsAndBillions 5 points ago +5 / -0

It's more so the local wildlife don't consume spike proteins.

5
macrolinx 5 points ago +5 / -0

Worms get blood clots too, you savage!

21
Gelus 21 points ago +22 / -1

That depends on how much .50BMG they're willing to collect while attempting to collect my domicile.

If I'm going to be homeless I've got nothing to lose.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
4
Kekman85 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly!

2
entwickelnden 2 points ago +2 / -0

plus amo is weight, the more you use, the less you have to move :P

19
stok 19 points ago +19 / -0

I know it seems bad right now, but it's gonna get so much worse

5
RexCollumSilvarum 5 points ago +5 / -0

Any time some sheep tell you inflation is good and that you just have to invest in the stock market to get ahead of it, remind them of this.

2
prayinpede 2 points ago +2 / -0

No the endgame is a hot civil war. This is the spark to set it off

1
CentralAmericanPede 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bingo.

78
South_Florida_Guy 78 points ago +78 / -0

I bet congress will be "exempt' from that, too.

32
gaijin_ronin 32 points ago +32 / -0

and get security walls with 24/7 heavily armed security

16
spezpedobestfriend 16 points ago +17 / -1

Oh if something like this goes live, those walls won't save them and their security will flee when they see what's coming for them. Plus lets look at this logically, their security guards would be ID'd and the vulnerable ones would be ID'd, threats would be made or money paid. From there its all over for them. Go into a warzone, no sane politician was anywhere outside of a greenzone ever. Our politicians haven't learned that one yet. If they fuck the US citizen over as hard as they are trying, full on color revolution and a lot of elected officials won't survive the mob eating them alive.

Food is up $175/person now. Once food costs 40% of a persons wage, food riots break out. With the cut down on police and military it will be game over for a number of Democratic cities and their suburbs. I'm in an exaburb, but frankly I'm looking to a more wooded and remote area to bypass this shit. I'll just watch the death and murder of Democrats to Democrats remotely.

8
gaijin_ronin 8 points ago +8 / -0

I concur. Unfortunately for me I am stuck in a city and one with a large military presence. This place will go to hell in a hand basket quickly. I am working on an exit but if SHTF sooner my only recourse will be to get my ratio as high as possible and do my part.

2
Seatacjoe 2 points ago +2 / -0

I wish we were neighbors, I feel the same

3
gaijin_ronin 3 points ago +3 / -0

In spirit pede.

1
Ironfield 1 point ago +2 / -1

My concern is that the left wants the revolution to kickoff because it's easier to then purge us. Not with our country's own troops but via EU/UN and other neighbour states. i.e the North.

Either way, it's going to get a hell of a lot worse before it gets better. Look after your loved ones.

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

Neighbour

Foreigner Detected

2
ColbyP 2 points ago +2 / -0

Remember, blue helmets on American soil are target practice, not people.

2
Crisis83 2 points ago +2 / -0

The way things are going, they will need it but it won't matter. Even 1% of the population, since it's heavily armed can take away their right to rule.

The sad thing is Covid has emboldened the authoritarians on the left and they think think they can get away with anything, no matter how reprehensible or damaging to future generations. They say think of the kids but they are robbing them blind. Just this year they are spending 6500 billion and only taking in about 4000 billion in revenue.

1
gaijin_ronin 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of course that common core math makes the numbers seem good to them. I don't know what (of if) the final straw will be that will finally cause an actionable response to the swamp. I believe if this new trillion(s) package is passed that will the final tipping point of no return. Everything will be under control of dc.

70
LesboPregnancyScare 70 points ago +70 / -0

i get the boomer quip of "at least the stock market is up", no shit, its because the dollar index is down, money is worth less, of course stocks go up.

58
HeadHoncho 58 points ago +58 / -0

I hear this all the time with home prices. And even let myself think it too.

"Things can't be that bad, hell my property doubled in price the last few years!"

Things are exactly that bad.

34
LesboPregnancyScare 34 points ago +35 / -1

there was a retarded article on a car enthusiast site that said exactly this, but about your used car. "everyones car is worth more"

No dipshit, your 9 year old Honda isnt more valuable, money is worth less.

All the retards but 2 argued against me. fucking retards.

20
DJTrump 20 points ago +20 / -0

I saw a bunch of people online saying a tax on unrealized gains would be good, because it'll finally get the rich to pay their fair share. Oy! You gotta be retarded if you think they are going to screw over their rich buddies, instead of the middle class.

9
OhLollyLollyPop 9 points ago +10 / -1

All of those unrealized gains are flying to a Caribbean island bank right now. Yellen is an idiot like FJB.

4
NomadicKrow2 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'll move my crypto investments to an overseas exchange if I have to. This is a great way to have wealth flee the country. They're right on track. Stretched out, this plan might not have pissed people off. But Trump scared them and they're stepping on the gas. Get ready for the mask to come off in the next four years.

4
Directional 4 points ago +4 / -0

Overseas accounts are useless with FATCA laws, unless you want to store your money somewhere like Angola.

But you don’t have to move crypto anywhere. Just ensure it is in a hardware or offline wallet.

1
NomadicKrow2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently if I transfer it directly to USDT, and USDT is pegged to 1USD, I wouldn't owe any tax. I dunno. I'll have to ask someone. I'm expecting big money on SHIB soon. End of year, it should hit 0.000112.

1
MikeObamasVeineyCock 1 point ago +1 / -0

Blob fish.

6
day221 6 points ago +8 / -2

Historically though stocks have not been a hedge for inflation. Too much inflation is bad for the economy and that puts downward pressure on stock prices.

3
NomadicKrow2 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep. People think "the dollar" is a fixed value. It is not. One of the ways I like to look at it is "how much is gold worth?" That gives me a pretty good idea. Physical gold, not paper gold.

5
MarcusAurelius 5 points ago +5 / -0

That and the Fed buys stock and mortgage backed securities.

From March 11 2020 to October 2021, the Fed has bought 4.2 trillion dollars of Securities through Qualitative Easing.

3
RexCollumSilvarum 3 points ago +3 / -0

Qualitative and quantitative "easing".

Which is Fed-speak for "debasing".

1
NomadicKrow2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Explain to me, Marcus.

1
MarcusAurelius 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Fed can print an unlimited number of dollars. The only requisite is that they "must" buy something, such as a debt with them. This is typically how dollars are "made". The fed acquires a loan from the bank, and the fed gives dollars to banks. The other way of course is to acquire treasury bonds from the government. As long as the Fed agrees, the government can borrow an unlimited amount of money. Crank those printing presses up.

One of the changes is that the Fed can also buy corporate bonds and stocks, through a program called qualitative easing. The Fed owns ~$8 trillion dollars of these securities. Pretty nice way to guarantee good market growth if the people who have an unlimited amount of money buy stock to drive the price up.

48
FelixtheMan 48 points ago +48 / -0

Just like new taxes won't hurt you unless you make over 400k a year. Well guess what, everyone is going to have to make 400k to retire by 70 pretty soon.

19
BlackPillBot 19 points ago +19 / -0

Retire?!? 🤣

Good one fren.

38
DeadOverRed 38 points ago +38 / -0

Taxes are theft.

7
RexCollumSilvarum 7 points ago +8 / -1

Inflation is current and retroactive theft.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
TDS_Consultant 3 points ago +3 / -0

*in a debt based economy

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

There is no such thing as currency shortage. Ever.

0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s like saying tax cuts cost money.

You’re criticizing people for not knowing history (including me, I think), but you’re confusing your own facts. We didn’t get off the gold standard in the depression, that’s when the confiscations began, under FDR. The currency was still backed by gold until 1971, when Nixon formally ended it. Since then the dollar has plummeted about 97% in value.

We won’t ever have a currency shortage because government isn’t disciplined enough to tolerate one, when in reality devaluation is helpful, like a respite from the universally accepted and constant assault on savings produced by our labor.

The government has created more money in the last 12 months than like the previous 245 years combined. That cannot sustain. There is an end to it, and it’s ugly.

You want to talk history, there’s more than enough examples of overinflation—from Rome to Zimbabwe, to Venezuela, to Weimar—to more than speak against your scant evidence of deflation ever existing in any significant form that brought down nations like overinflation has.

We have universal standards for time, weight, distance. If the price of meat stayed the same but the grocer could change the meaning of a “pound” of beef every time you went to the store, then there would be lynch mobs stringing him up in the parking lot. But we constantly change the value of currency and no one bats an eye. It’s just normal and accepted. What’s the big deal? Of course money inflates, your savings account and hard-earned living will just have to deal with it.

Fuck. No.

1
RexCollumSilvarum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely untrue. When we do see deflation -- and we almost never do -- it's on the order of 0.1% or 0.5%. We never see producers unable to sell at any price because there are no buyers with any money, which is the kind of deflation that would be the sign of a bad economy and which happened during the Great Depression.

Japan had that kind of low deflation in the 2000s. It helped an entire generation of young people save for their first homes and maintain their quality of life after the bubble popped. With even the 0-2% inflation that the central banks want to foist on us, they would have been on the hamster wheel watching prices go up all the time and wouldn't have been able to get ahead.

34
Langtath 34 points ago +34 / -0

Start a church, name yourself head pastor, sell your house to the church for 1 dollar, use the house for "religious practice," pay no property tax.

If you want your child to inherit the house, make him head pastor when you die. No inheritance tax.

My family has run a Christian camp, which housed several people on a semi-permanent basis, for decades and pay no taxes. The only time the city tried to collect (unsuccessfully) was during a period of a few years when nobody made the camp a permanent address, and only 4 rallies were held. The church leaders just increased the property use, had more services and that was that.

I think they pay a small fee every year for fire and police, but it's nothing compared to paying tax for the more than 100 acres.

9
tactical_potato 9 points ago +9 / -0

Bruh. I'm going to need to request since more details. Down to do this right now.

1
scottcaver1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seconded.

4
JackSharpScribe 4 points ago +4 / -0

This is a really interesting idea actually. In the days of the early church, converts would sell their property and give the money to the apostles to use for the best purposes of expanding the brethren. I wonder if tight-knit church groups may have to use this strategy you're talking about over the coming years, where you have tons and tons of people who essentially give their houses over to the church for church use but in reality they still live in their house.

Though that's assuming the tax-exempt status of the church remains intact over time.

3
wwwooowww 3 points ago +4 / -1

Maga needs more ministry anyway

2
MasksAreChildAbuse 2 points ago +2 / -0

Genius!

28
n4freedom 28 points ago +28 / -0

If this passes I will most likely shift all of my retirement assets into the physical things the government still does not trace. Except DWAC.

13
FelixtheMan 13 points ago +13 / -0

Other than physical metals what assets?

24
HeadHoncho 24 points ago +25 / -1

Look at a 10 year chart of gold, then silver.

Both are dog shit compared to ammo.

You can feed your family, barter with neighbors, defend your home, even overthrow a tyrannical government with ammo.

3
Lord_Kek 3 points ago +4 / -1

My professor always talked up index funds and was heavily against gold and silver for long term investments. Lead has always been the superior choice.

2
NomadicKrow2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gold only goes up significantly when the dollar goes down. At least that's what I've noticed.

1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

The Fed has kept the price of gold (and silver) artificially low.

http://news.goldseek.com/Zealllc/1449248495.php

https://gata.org

1
FelixtheMan 1 point ago +1 / -0

I haven't bought metals Ina while, but getting silver at spot is pretty cheap impossible around here. Eagles are like a 5 dollar premium which is twice what is was 10 years ago

1
PotionSeller 1 point ago +1 / -0

If we had a bullet based economy I might be inclined to pay taxes.

14
n4freedom 14 points ago +14 / -0

ammo, storable foods, collectables, I'm sure there's more but metals are the most efficient. An obnoxious trade off, but they'll absolutely destroy our wealth otherwise. It will take some thought and planning I'm sure.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
19
Maga2020Maga2020 19 points ago +19 / -0

And Vanguard owns 1/4th of Blackrock

Its all a scam to hide the ultra rich and make it seem like there are not massive monopolies.

Coke and Pepsi are not competitors, they are owned by the same mega funds and it does not stop there, its nearly every single industry.

19
marvinthehaggler 19 points ago +19 / -0

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered." - Thomas Jefferson, tho' the provenance is dispoooted. Still, it's the right idea.

19
Sliced_Beef_Brisket 19 points ago +20 / -1

I'd start murdering people of they tried to tax my unrealized gains. At that point there is nothing left to lose. They are taking your future financial security from you.

9
OhLollyLollyPop 9 points ago +9 / -0

They are flatly stealing your future for legislation no one except the gimme crowd wants.

5
NomadicKrow2 5 points ago +5 / -0

Unrealized gains is the only thing they don't tax, currently. In some way, shape, or form, literally everything else is taxed.

2
BlackPillBot 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yeah, I’ve been telling people for a while now, and that what we will see in the even nearer future than I was predicting before the Bolsheviks stole the election, is a bunch of mini Wacos, and Ruby Ridges that will result in the deaths of the first few victims along with some tyrants, but will have the effect of waking many normies up more than anything else we’ve seen yet IMHO.

The main advantage we have now compared to Waco, and ruby ridge is that cameras are everywhere, and anyone with an IQ above 65 can livestream. Having families shot at/killed live on camera who have no criminal records, as they state their case, and background as a moral law abiding citizen who just wants to be left alone, and keep their home changes everything IMHO. My biggest worry is that they will start fucking with data transfer signals, and hiding body camera footage in cases where they just want to disarm Americans, and steal their property. Where things could get really interesting is when LEO frens on the inside start warning the intended homeowner victims ahead of time so they can prepare, and when neighbors adjacent to the victims start taking out tyrants IN MINECRAFT as they stack up around the entrances to the house. Shit gets sideways really quick when you’re taking fire from different unexpected angles/places. The best case scenario, which, unfortunately, I have absolutely no illusion of actually happening, would be other LEOs showing up, and drawing down on the tyrannical LEO who actually started stacking up at the scene of the house they intend on arm robbing the victims of.

1
wwwooowww 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bro this guy has a good idea just start holding church services.

18
AbrahamLincoln 18 points ago +18 / -0

Dale Gribble right again.

11
jmfdmf07 11 points ago +11 / -0

You must be mistaken. He was introduced to me as Rusty Shackleford.

12
nickybops 12 points ago +12 / -0

keynesian economics = shit

10
JediDwag 10 points ago +11 / -1

With money borrowed at virtually zero interest from the government who is printing it.

9
DemonkkkRatSlavers 9 points ago +9 / -0

(((BlackRock Investment))) purely coincidental...

5
BlackPillBot 5 points ago +5 / -0

EVERYTIME!!!

8
Panopticon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Oh and crash the stockmarket if it's keeping pace with inflation... Because you might be able to pay the house tax with it.

7
Justaguy147 7 points ago +7 / -0

This will be considered an act of war.

17
AbrahamLincoln 17 points ago +17 / -0

I'm losing track of all the acts of war at this point.

12
Justaguy147 12 points ago +12 / -0

3 more and you can expect a stern letter.

6
Directional 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is MMT run amok. They aren’t even trying to hide it anymore.

Create currency, cycle it through the economy, tax it to reclaim it and start the cycle over again. The motion of currency certainly stimulates economic activity, but the music stops when production of currency out-cycles real productivity.

Tl;dr - we are fucked. If you don’t have tangible investment or crypto to help sustain yourself in the crash of the dollar and the market, you will be in a bread line.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
80960KA 4 points ago +5 / -1

They miss the "people die when they try to take my house" part.

3
Dimedog 3 points ago +3 / -0

Tax abuse

3
debtfuelsthem 3 points ago +3 / -0

Warren Buffets whole thing is to unrealize gains, no dividends, nothing, keep it in the stock so he doesnt have to pay tax

2
BillionsAndBillions 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well then, he should be fighting this harder than he did the pipelines. He likely has an exit strategy.

1
debtfuelsthem 1 point ago +1 / -0

he fought the pipelines? he's probably winning on the big oil trade that setup

hes not the old sweet man they spin him as, he's done the opposite of a lot of the things he says in his books and probably will again

1
BillionsAndBillions 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's heavily invested in railroad transport. Pipelines are competition.

2
debtfuelsthem 2 points ago +2 / -0

meanwhile trains moving oil has never caused problems (Lac-Mégantic rail disaster)

3
Seruna_Kanus 3 points ago +4 / -1

And the Retards wonder why rent keeps increasing.

2
CentralAmericanPede 2 points ago +2 / -0

I going to move my money overseas if these people get too overzealous with these taxes.

1
OhLollyLollyPop 1 point ago +1 / -0

So will the astoundingly rich that FJB says he is going after. I would be surprised if any of their money is still in the USA

1
Directional 1 point ago +1 / -0

It won’t matter with FATCA laws.

2
Maroon 2 points ago +2 / -0

You forgot step 3 Whatever dumbass they send to collect fucking dies

2
MasksAreChildAbuse 2 points ago +3 / -1

Regardless of the Biden/stolen election situation, we honestly need to secede regardless because of the federal government taxes alone.

The mere fact you literally cannot buy property is insane. And for some reason everyone thinks perpetually renting property for your entire life—and if you resist you will be murdered by police—is no big deal. That’s insanity to me.

1
TheSaltyProphet 1 point ago +1 / -0

do you think they have the people to force the American people off OUR OWN PROPERTY? WE WILL FUCKING KILL ANYONE WHO TRIES.

1
Eatinglue 1 point ago +1 / -0

Which is why property taxes are bullahit.

1
Crisis83 1 point ago +1 / -0

There are many arguments against Yellen's unrealized gains but houses at this point isn't one of them. They said capital gains from liquid and semi-liquid assets, a house is neither.

But an IRA or a 401k could be considered along with normal brokerage accounts, which means taxing 80-90% of the whole workforce on unrealized gains every year. Not to mention accounts that are setup to save for tuition, FSA and HSA.

Their shit affects everyone and taxes every one. Least of all billionairs. That is why they want to spend 80 Billion on new IRS agents and snoop into any bank account that has more than $500 in transactions. Biden's "Build Back Better" is a Tax Everyone to Death plan.

1
SaltyDoodle 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to the NY Post, the unrealized gains tax as proposed would only affect the country’s top 1000 billionaires. https://nypost.com/2021/10/24/dems-plan-billionaires-unrealized-gains-tax-to-help-fund-2t-bill/

1
chefjeffb 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't refinance and get a new appraisal and your home taxes won't increase

1
BillionsAndBillions 1 point ago +1 / -0

Local governments to appraisals for property tax purposes.

1
nautilus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Your house is now worth $400k, so you have to take out a home-equity loan to pay the taxes on that unrealized $200k gain. Your monthly just went up by 20% <--- this is what they want. No real-estate or stock market investments to counter inflation.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
dorsalmorsel 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bankrupt the currency forcing everyone to live pay check to paycheck. Force everyone to keep money in banks, stop printing physical currency. Implement negative interest rates for all bank accounts. Everyone becomes Boxer from Animal Farm

-49
KrellKrypto -49 points ago +5 / -54

did you listen to what yellen actually said. she said it would only effect the billionaires. I'm all for the gov stealing all their assets. It would be what they deserve for globalizing the country

43
BIDENTHEKIDSNIFFER 43 points ago +43 / -0

Because theyd never lie to get a new tax pushed through right? Trust the deep state!

-21
KrellKrypto -21 points ago +1 / -22

I dont, just saying we are taking her out of context. i don't like that, period. she said they were thinking of taxing the super rich, not us. period.

she might not mean what she is saying but that doesn't give us the right to put words in her mouth.

And FUCK THE FEDS

24
WhiteTrashJesus 24 points ago +24 / -0

It's not out of context because they say that every single time and every single time it is not just for billionaires

-18
KrellKrypto -18 points ago +2 / -20

"Secretary Yellen stated that they were looking into new taxes that would hit the very wealthy"

22
WhiteTrashJesus 22 points ago +22 / -0

Name one tax that you pay that was not described as being for the wealthy when it was introduced

-16
KrellKrypto -16 points ago +2 / -18

Income tax….

25
n4freedom 25 points ago +25 / -0

Income tax was sold to americans as only for the wealthy. That lie is exactly how they drummed up support for the 16th amendment. It's the same lie, they've literally been using the same lie for over 100 years now.

7
WhiteTrashJesus 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Revenue Act of 1913 was had an exemption of 3,000 which was 66,000 in 2010 dollars and then it was 1 percent up to 440,000 2010 dollars

1
Whathell 1 point ago +2 / -1

Oh look isn’t that precious, it’s retarded!!!

13
DickTick 13 points ago +13 / -0

Holy fuck, you can't actually believe that. Her prior statements tell you exactly what she plans on doing......

4
BlackPillBot 4 points ago +4 / -0

Way more than just her prior statements. She’s a Bolshevik through and through.

-6
KrellKrypto -6 points ago +3 / -9

No I don’t believe it.

Of course fucking not.

That doesn’t mean I don’t want to force the Uber rich to pay for exporting American jobs to China

2
passivedouble2 2 points ago +4 / -2

You’re getting a lot of down votes, but I feel you fren. If there were a way they could actually penalize the robber Barons who sold out this country, it would be great. Those guys gamed the system and don’t pay anything in taxes

2
tabularasa_556 2 points ago +2 / -0

"The Biden administration is looking to allow the IRS to monitor all bank accounts with more than $600 to ensure the very wealthy pay their fair share"

8
DeadOverRed 8 points ago +8 / -0

LOL. Go kick that football, Charlie Brown.

4
BlackPillBot 4 points ago +4 / -0

He’d probably rather sit on it, and make it disappear.

-6
KrellKrypto -6 points ago +2 / -8

I KNOW SHE IS LYING thats not my fucking point

-24
KrellKrypto -24 points ago +3 / -27

im not arguing that. but everyone is misconstruing what she said.

it was an attack against the mega rich, not us. We don't need to sound alarm bells yet imo.

the 600 monitoring however....

25
BIDENTHEKIDSNIFFER 25 points ago +26 / -1

No, its a foot in the door to push this concept. If it doesnt affect you now it will when they need to fund another round of free shit for the taker democrats.

6
WhiteTrashJesus 6 points ago +6 / -0

not only that but it will crash the economy

-1
KrellKrypto -1 points ago +3 / -4

the democrats are running out of runway FAST.

i would be willing to bet my bottom dollar they are not even a thing in another 10 years.

9
n4freedom 9 points ago +9 / -0

you have to be trolling. they do nothing but find new ways to tax and suck wealth out of the middle class and self-made-but-not-elite-rich class. This will punish everyone except who they claim it will punish, following the same pattern of everything else they do.

-5
KrellKrypto -5 points ago +2 / -7

i dont disagree i am simply saying that is not what she said.

now i dont trust her AT all but thats not that point

11
n4freedom 11 points ago +11 / -0

so no one is misconstruing what she said, they're reading between the lines and understanding from history that this is just more government take over of the lives of everyone but the super rich.

-2
KrellKrypto -2 points ago +2 / -4

fair enough.

then we have no beef at all and are all on the same page.

I say what i said because I MYSELF though she made it as a blanket statement based on the reporting.

god bless

3
n4freedom 3 points ago +3 / -0

lol, I have no beef with any anonymous person I don't know on the internet. Some people get beefs with me though, even here. Angry people everywhere.

3
Ex-libtard 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am not a jealous person

17
FreeChopperRides [S] 17 points ago +17 / -0

Holy fuck this is the most retarded thing on the internet today. Bravo.

-11
KrellKrypto -11 points ago +3 / -14

thanks. the libertarian inside me is always at odds with the national socialist inside me. tends to result in high level retardation

12
Ex-libtard 12 points ago +14 / -2

Lol the two dumbest sides a person could take. Utopian faggotry.

1
n4freedom 1 point ago +3 / -2

I think democrat is the worst. At least the socialist try to end the drug war. Democrats do 0 good. socialists want to do 5% good and 95% destroy everything else. Libertarianism would be great except the leave me alone crowd will never actually take control of government and abolish the massive stupidity.

-2
KrellKrypto -2 points ago +3 / -5

idk i think the Muslims would like a word about that.

0
spezpedobestfriend 0 points ago +3 / -3

The left are race based marxist and you are a race based marxist, please get your testies cut off. The world needs less of both.

9
HeadHoncho 9 points ago +10 / -1

Right, did you even listen to what Fauci actually said? C'mon guys, it's just 15 days. And it's just to flatten the curve.

Forced vaccines are a far-right conspiracy theory, that would never happen. And no, no one is going to force your kids to wear masks!

8
OrganicPINEAPPLES 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's unconstitutional to target only a certain group of people for one, and second we don't owe the government jack shit, billionaire or not. Government ruins and destroys everything it touched. How can you not realize that every bad situation in our country is a direct result of government. Why do you think they can spend your money better than you? Perhaps if people got jobs instead of welfare we would have almost no poverty.. what a concept.

8
LesboPregnancyScare 8 points ago +8 / -0

there has never been a government tax program that started out only affecting a small group of people. they always grow. and nothing is more permanent than a temporary [not saying this is] government program.

this has got to stop.

-1
KrellKrypto -1 points ago +3 / -4

I don’t trust them on thier word either

I am simply stating that I think forcing the Uber rich to pay for the exporting of American labor to China is a good thing

4
LesboPregnancyScare 4 points ago +4 / -0

and you think the elites are really going to go after their own? dont be an idiot.

3
MarcusAurelius 3 points ago +3 / -0

And do you think the wealth tax will impact people who keep all their assets in the Cayman Islands?