4259
()
posted ago by TLDC ago by TLDC +4259 / -0
Comments (271)
sorted by:
217
BloodDe 217 points ago +218 / -1

Doesn’t sound like they’re proud of what they teach

156
Toohershat 156 points ago +156 / -0

They know it's incredibly unpopular, and they'd be overruled by the community if it became public.

46
Tallsie 46 points ago +46 / -0

Since when did the community get kicked out of the teaching process? We went from a community hired single teacher that worked out of a church with all age groups in the same room to a process with lawyers and NDAs?

35
VA-Pede 35 points ago +35 / -0

Since communists.

8
freeamerica4ever 8 points ago +8 / -0

Definitely not an improvement. Everyone gets years of schooling yet somehow we're less educated than ever.

4
deleted 4 points ago +4 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
17
NomadicKrow2 17 points ago +17 / -0

JOIN YOUR SCHOOL BOARDS. LEAD YOUR SCHOOL BOARDS.

12
deleted 12 points ago +15 / -3
-12
deleted -12 points ago +2 / -14
9
OZ00MSTALLGEESE 9 points ago +11 / -2

Jews aren't white.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +2 / -9
7
OZ00MSTALLGEESE 7 points ago +7 / -0

Does white mean European to you?

Jews are not European. Judaism is a religion and an ethnic group. If you are stupid enough to not know that then literally just look up Judaism on wikipedia and read the first few paragraphs because you probably will think I'm just making shit up otherwise.

1
pnwpatriot97 1 point ago +2 / -1

Jewish grey imo.

7
deleted 7 points ago +11 / -4
-1
Nimblenavigator1 -1 points ago +2 / -3

It’s a religion, not a race onto itself. Ethnic group? In some respects.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
6
NotAPuma 6 points ago +7 / -1

You Bill Mitchell? Or are you just an unrelated Faggot?

-7
deleted -7 points ago +1 / -8
95
AHonkTooFar 95 points ago +95 / -0

Child groomers generally don't like what they do coming to light, these are no different.

56
Rudy_DankMemer 56 points ago +56 / -0

Child groomers generally don't like what they do coming to light, these are no different.

If people only knew how bad it really is. Queer books with graphic sexual descriptions are in Public School Libraries. One based dude has been calling them out for the vile filth that they are.

47
fskfsk 47 points ago +47 / -0

Grooming is a thing, which means homosexuality is not "You're born that way." It's the result of abuse.

22
Quietam_Unum 22 points ago +22 / -0

which means homosexuality is not "You're born that way."

Used to work at a N.E. university and saw more that I wanted to: Homosexuals recruit. Anyone tells you otherwise is lying. They find the vulnerable, cut them out of the "herd," and prey on them. They recruit.

5
fskfsk 5 points ago +5 / -0

I've never seen this process documented anywhere. Do you have any sources?

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
12
Usmc_vet 12 points ago +12 / -0

Totally accurate!

4
AHonkTooFar 4 points ago +5 / -1

It's definitely a lot more prevalent thanks to abuse, I can't say if it'd go away completely though since other animals have varying rates of homosexuality from zero to a lot more as nature is known to fuck up. It's definitely far beyond natural.

If pedos had the fear of death put back into them again (not these pathetic 3 year sentences with 2 on 'good behavior') that'd help get our culture back on track. I can tolerate a few people where nature fucked up - like the whole trans and intersex bullshit, you never hear anything from actual intersex people, just attention whores and kids abused mentally or physically by parents and teachers to turn trans - anyone and everyone who actively tries to push these abnormalities on kids needs to eat lead, I don't give a shit which protected class they belong to.

4
fskfsk 4 points ago +5 / -1

I'm surprised there aren't more people who just kill the pedo, rather than turn them over to the police for a slap on the wrist.

4
AHonkTooFar 4 points ago +4 / -0

Naivety maybe? But it surprises me too, cases like the guy in Texas or the woman in Germany who blew the monsters that targeted their kids away seem few and far between (or I guess the two women recently in the UK, one with boiling sugar water (topkek) and the other who used a knife).

Then on the other hand you get morons like the parents of that one girl who got murdered by an illegal here and they took his cousin in. I'll never understand. That's beyond naivety, that's cult behavior.

2
ufkyflflfguio 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because if you kill them, or even just injure them, you get more time than they do.

3
SecedeNOW 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not that nature fucked up, animals only resort to attempting sex with the same gender in the absence of mates of the opposite sex. It's like like prison homosexuality, mostly It's just dudes pretending other dudes are women since there aren't any. Certainly that's not every single case but you get the idea.

2
AHonkTooFar 2 points ago +2 / -0

Prison homosexuality is a fair point and lends itself to the idea that a lot of it in humans is just abuse. But there are species that have gay sex without a lack of opposite sex mates / will pretty much have sex no matter what - and individual animals in some species that do much, much worse (but at a higher rate than humans). Look at otters.

You can't apply human morality to the entire animal kingdom, nor am I saying we should emulate animals.

2
SecedeNOW 2 points ago +2 / -0

Excellent point

2
ColbyP 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, homosexuality in animals doesn't really exist. Many times it's a dominance thing, other times no females are present but they still want to hump something, etc. Pretty much no animals have exclusively same sex relationships.

1
AHonkTooFar 1 point ago +1 / -0

Obviously not exclusively or they'd die out, but in some animals like some birds it's stupid high, like 25%, since they can steal eggs or have another bird lay them in their nest.

Bed bugs reproduce by impaling and otters are necrophiliacs.

It's unwise to apply human morality to all animals, it doesn't work. Likewise I'm not saying we should necessarily look to them as examples to follow.

2
AtheistTrumper 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dunno, I was abused and I'm not gay in the slightest. Happily married super straight.

29
Grady_Wilson 29 points ago +29 / -0

If showing a kid the very same material outside of school would get you arrested, why the hell is it anywhere near a school setting?

12
DrBJTester 12 points ago +13 / -1

Because you have pedophiles approving other pedophiles lesson plans and curriculum.

Which is exactly why they want you to sign an NDA before you can look at it. In what clown world should a parent be prohibited from talking about what the school is going to teach their children? This is insanity!

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
6
AnacronicA 6 points ago +6 / -0

If certain material deemed illicit/illegal is discovered during the viewing, would that void the NDA?

4
MasklessMarvel 4 points ago +4 / -0

Child groomers generally don't like what they do coming to light,

i have never had a problem with watching my kid get a haircut

20
KekistanPM 20 points ago +20 / -0

They're definitely proud of it. Evil is proud of their works, but they don't want to be on camera unless they're sure there will be no consequences.

11
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 11 points ago +11 / -0

Sounds like the school board members need to take a little helicopter ride. Not kidding.

5
ChuckedBeef 5 points ago +5 / -0

NDA for a public school, LMAO I don't think so.

162
sordfysh 162 points ago +164 / -2

Get a lawyer, sign the NDA, release the docs, ignore the cease and desist, dismiss the lawsuit on grounds of invalid contract for public policy reasons.

Not all contracts are valid. They are only as enforceable as a judge is willing to enforce. Contracts that bind people against the public interest are generally invalid.

A company cannot legally force you to conspire against your community. A government has even less power (but also less liability).

84
Saltyminer11 84 points ago +84 / -0

I'm like you. I don't think the NDA would hold up. I'd gladly publish it having signed an NDA.

34
deleted 34 points ago +36 / -2
48
rebuildingMyself 48 points ago +49 / -1

They make sense in some contexts, like a consultant signing one before being granted access to production-level data in a corporation (to fix a problem he was hired to fix).

But for a parent to view the school curriculum is NOT this situation...at all.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
5
_Eric_Ciaramella_ 5 points ago +7 / -2

Counter this guy's specific example. Why do you not agree with this situation?

7
deleted 7 points ago +10 / -3
7
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 7 points ago +9 / -2

Your rights do not apply in that situation. It's just a contract.

4
Pulchritude2 4 points ago +6 / -2

Every NDA isn't an act of Congress.

Public sector also does not equal private sector.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's also the right to privacy.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Eu-is-socialist 2 points ago +3 / -1

Because it's useless.

If damage was incurred from disclosure . SUE . The law should be enough .

There is 0 use for AN NDA.

What the NDA attempts to do is FIRST SCARE YOU. And second ... to limit your speech even though your SPEECH didn't produce provable damage so that they can be compensated . If provable damage was done you get compensated based on law. Simple ... just like calling someone a thief . Either he is a thief and the disclosure was a public service or he isn't a thief therefore he should be compensated for whatever damage your statement did .

-1
_Eric_Ciaramella_ -1 points ago +1 / -2

The NDA is what is used in a lawsuit for damage. Without the NDA, you are basically stating its totally cool for you to give that information to a competitor who then uses said information to beat you in business. Like going in TV and saying "we are working on developing x", and then your competitor goes 'well golly, we can beat then at developing x' and they do. You wouldn't be able to sue your competitor because they beat you, because you openly gave away that info.

If that same info was given to your competitor from some tech you hired to work on something, who you made sign an NDA that they won't disclose info to anyone because the info they are being allowed access to is secret and the release of said info would cause them harm, then you could sue because the NDA is the grounds for said suit.

INAL but I'm struggling to see your point. Honestly, it's coming off as some utopian philosophy like anarchy or communism.

2
ufkyflflfguio 2 points ago +3 / -1

A private contract agreed upon by two private individuals should not exist? THAT'S communism.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
refresco 2 points ago +2 / -0

I dont see what the problem with paying someone on the condition that they dont give your trade secrets to the competitor. Seems pretty reasonable.

2
ufkyflflfguio 2 points ago +2 / -0

Important part is it's voluntary by all parties signing. The honoring of voluntary contracts is what made the western world separate from everyone else and why capitalism was able to flourish.

4
Saltyminer11 4 points ago +4 / -0

Rxactly.

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +2 / -0

the 1A only covers the relationship between you and the government

not you and a private company

5
rosie 5 points ago +5 / -0

The school district is not a private company.

0
MasklessMarvel 0 points ago +1 / -1

let me try to susplain this again

the school district buys the curriculum from a private company,

just like they buy textbooks

the private company needs to protect its intellectual property rights

they are requiring the NDA so the parents don't spread their material all over the internet and ruin their business

it's not a gag order. parents can discuss it

they just can't reproduce the material

3
RachetQueen2020 3 points ago +3 / -0

So now private companies are allowed to dictate and write school curriculum?

What are teachers being paid for again? Indoctrination, grooming and Marxism.

1
refresco 1 point ago +1 / -0

I scrolled pretty far to get to this. More sensationalism. This makes more sense.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
sordfysh 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are definitely an authoritarian invention, but they are necessary if you want to have a company with trade secrets.

I think it would be bad for the economy if the court did not recognize trade secrets. Trade secrets are natural for any business venture. Gangs, cartels, and mafias have tons of trade secrets, but they enforce them on their own, with violence. If the court didn't provide some way for a business to protect their trade secrets, legal businesses would have a natural disadvantage against mafia-run businesses.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
3
sordfysh 3 points ago +3 / -0

In China, they are enforced by the mafia or the CCP.

The only businesses in China that can survive are under the thumb of the mafia or the CCP or both.

Anyone who does NDAs with Chinese businesses or Chinese nationals are retarded. Some people think that US laws apply everywhere. Just like some people think that the US is more racist than most countries. Our business leadership in the US is corrupted with nepotism and ideologues.

5
SHILL_DETECTOR 5 points ago +5 / -0

they wouldnt even sue the parent for releasing the info...they would just LOSE

4
MagaMagaChooChoo 4 points ago +5 / -1

Assuming we actually had rule of law in this country, I’d agree with you. Unfortunately, as has been proven, every court in America is full-on Communist. It literally wouldn’t surprise me to see jail time for violating the NDA even though it would be a civil matter. Literally nothing would surprise me at this point except a pro-America, pro-Constitution, or pro-White verdict.

4
saltyviewer123 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's too bad joggers don't like to acquire documents like this and make them public.

11
AHonkTooFar 11 points ago +11 / -0

Best comment in this thread. It's worth a shot, as much as I don't trust the system.

7
AmericanJawa 7 points ago +7 / -0

Alternatively, sue to have the documents released to the public for everyone to see as they please.

5
fskfsk 5 points ago +5 / -0

Only worth it for someone to take this risk if:

  • You already have a lawyer lined up to defend you pro bono.
  • You don't have substantial assets that can be taken in a lawsuit.
8
FireannDireach 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm not so sure about the assets part. An NDA is a civil contract, and generally is used to protect trade secrets, or manufacturing processes, things of that nature. The school isn't a for-profit business, so where would they show damage to a judge, other than breaking the contract, which isn't a criminal act in itself.

Not a lawyer, but I don't think the NDA would survive court review. It strikes me as abuse of NDAs on the school board's part, if they're claiming their curriculum is a trade secret. Or their intellectual property.

I think it's a bluff, but an expensive one, and the board is counting on parents not being wealthy enough to afford an extended lawsuit, even if they win.

3
fskfsk 3 points ago +3 / -0

They're using a loophole to enforce the NDA.

School district signs an NDA with the "CRT Education" vendor.

Thus, the NDA must also be enforced when sharing the information with parents.

It isn't the school district claiming damages, it's the "CRT Education" vendor claiming damages. Copyright law can have statutory damages of $150k per infringement, even if there is no actual harm.

The bottom line is, if you're going to get in a protracted legal fight with an entity that has deep pockets, you need to make sure your own personal assets are protected first. You might say "It's nuts, there's no way someone would lose their savings over this NDA.", but worse things have happened with less evidence to people like Chauvin, Rittenhouse, McCloskey's, etc.

3
MasklessMarvel 3 points ago +3 / -0

it's not between the parents and the school

it's between the parents and the company that sells the curriculum

and you bet your ass its enforceable

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
sordfysh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe. But I reckon an appeals court would find it violates public policy as a matter of law unless it's in a Dem controlled state.

74
2008RonPaul2012 74 points ago +74 / -0

Property owners should be able to see what their tax dollars are buying. This is shady.

14
idea 14 points ago +14 / -0

They shouldn't be taxing property in the first place, because taxes are hella gay.

12
deleted 12 points ago +12 / -0
12
idea 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yep. We don't actually own the property anymore, we rent it from the government.

9
refresco 9 points ago +9 / -0

When I finally realized this I was really depressed. I'll never actually "own" my property free and clear. The government can just foreclose on it when I am no longer able to pay taxes. Which means to really own my house, I need to have it paid off and have enough money to cover property tax for the rest of my life.

2
2008RonPaul2012 2 points ago +2 / -0

Right I agree. But even on their faggy terms, these people are clearly hiding something.

51
TheOutlawPepeWales 51 points ago +51 / -0

Eligible parents may view the grade level(s) in which their student(s) is/are currently enrolled at that School.

Why don't they want anyone to see the big picture? That's creepy as fuck.

student(s)

You mean their child(ren)? Or is that word now on the naughty list for not being "inclusive" enough?

32
rosie 32 points ago +32 / -0

They don't want community members to find out what the chidren are being taught.

30
TheOutlawPepeWales 30 points ago +30 / -0

That's exactly what an abuser does. The children aren't being taught, they're being groomed.

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

then why are they allowing them to see it?

2
rosie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Who is allowing whom to see it?

1
MasklessMarvel 1 point ago +2 / -1

the company that produces the material are allowing people who did not pay for it to see it

6
TDAF 6 points ago +6 / -0

For the same reasons we can't examine the voting machines.

40
Unsilent 40 points ago +40 / -0

“ According to the district’s agreement with Second Step obtained by the Daily Caller, the curriculum is not subject to traditional Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws.”

It’s that easy to side step FOIA laws? Someone should test that in court…

25
Xanisor 25 points ago +25 / -0

I don't see a reason why a curriculum would not fall under FOIA. Which btw is a great tool to fight communist government institutions, more people should constantly request everything that could help.

4
Here_we_go 4 points ago +4 / -0

Its "copyrighted" like dominion

27
based_trekkie 27 points ago +27 / -0

Sign it...

Leave it in your unlocked car....

Then whoopsie....

Looks like a concerned parent stole it out of my parked car and it is now scanned by them and online for all to see!!!!

17
deleted 17 points ago +17 / -0
5
DennyCrane 5 points ago +5 / -0

Don’t you just hate it when that happens.

4
Here_we_go 4 points ago +4 / -0

They only can view it in person. No copies or anytging given to the parents

3
Desperado 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or in a Chinese hotel room. The Hilary Clinton method. Oopsie!

2
MasklessMarvel 2 points ago +3 / -1

sorry

you were obligated to protect it

3
based_trekkie 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sorry I locked my car, the unlock button must have accidentally been pressed when my keys were in my pocket...

25
Winner45 25 points ago +25 / -0

Next step: students sign NDAs not to discuss the things they learned at public school lmao

“Johnny, do you want help with your homework?”

“Seriously, mom? Are you trying to get me expelled?”

15
Winner45 15 points ago +15 / -0

Parent/teacher conference:

“How is Johnny doing in class, Ms. Xir?”

“You know i cannot discuss Johnny’s performance until you sign an NDA. And even then I can only discuss him on a need-to-know basis, and quite frankly, cishet, i don’t see any reason why you need to know.”

5
BewareOfThePug 5 points ago +5 / -0

Then I will need to waterboard it out of you.

19
bubadmt 19 points ago +19 / -0

How do these fucking people sleep at night? Their lives need to be made miserable, more than just protesting and canceling. Slash their tires, throw milkshakes at them whenever they're seen, megaphones outside their house at 3 AM, and that's just the start.

12
DudePlayingaDude 12 points ago +12 / -0

How do these fucking people sleep at night?

Cuddled up to their latest child victim, most probably.

6
covok48 6 points ago +6 / -0

They sleep perfectly peacefully.

That’s the problem.

2
MastaJoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hard to sleep soundly when your house is on fire. 🤷🏼‍♂️

15
nickybops 15 points ago +15 / -0

If a parent doesn't sue, they will be doing this everywhere.

10
deleted 10 points ago +11 / -1
1
covok48 1 point ago +6 / -5

Why do childless motherfuckers have to chime in on how parents raise their kids?

Usually the answer is money. Private schools cost a little bit less than college tuition per year, if you can get in. Homeschooling takes at least one parent out of the workforce which can crush household finances.

Also organization. Homeschool networks are ad hoc right now and vary in quality, if you can find one. And public schools were fine up through the ‘15-‘16 school year & went Nutella after that so parents are scrambling to adjust.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-1
covok48 -1 points ago +3 / -4

No, you just have really strong opinions on a subject you know nothing about. The fact I even have to explain this to you proves that.

1
deleted 1 point ago +4 / -3
-3
covok48 -3 points ago +1 / -4

Only kids without kids (you) would ask questions like that without putting a second thought into it.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
7
Bax101 7 points ago +7 / -0

My blood is boiling over the news of how we are losing this country so rapidly. It will be taken completely over by Xmas. I feel it. Everyone will be to cold and locked down to fight. Only those in RED states can be free.

2
covok48 2 points ago +3 / -1

It’s frustrating for sure. On. A personal level it feels like a game of Missile Command where at some point I’m just hoping to mitigate damage when too many changes come too fast from all directions.

6
sustainable_saltmine 6 points ago +6 / -0

NEVER sign an NDA. if it requires an NDA then they're doing something nefarious or illegal. SUE THEM

6
bringbackthe80s 6 points ago +6 / -0

Why TF would school curriculum be proprietary???!!!

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
2
BewareOfThePug 2 points ago +2 / -0

School Industrial Complex (SIC)

6
ForThisiStand 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hm…. When was the last time a left aligned organization made users sign non-disclosures? Oh wait, it was Dominion and every freaking county that used their stupid COUNTING software.

If something is publicly funded, everything should be published in the public domain. At this point, I’m starting to think even government and defense research should fall in that category. The Dems have compromised anything relevant national security anyway. This secrecy combined with evil intentions breeds corruption at an exponential level.

5
crazyjackel 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not only do you have to sign an NDA to see what they are teaching your kids. You can’t even get it via a FOIA request. WTF?

Government education should die. There is no recourse for parents other than to leave.

5
Hangmhigh 5 points ago +5 / -0

Leak it.

4
remindmelater 4 points ago +4 / -0

When the NDA is used to hide illegal or unethical, or immoral conduct then it is illegal....and thus not valid....

3
Rocks_vs_Uzis 3 points ago +3 / -0

So, just photograph the pages anyway. Old school tradecraft, hidden cameras. Then release the footage and photos to the internet. That's what I would do.

3
skywalk 3 points ago +3 / -0

WTF with that AIDS website?

1
thedaynos 1 point ago +1 / -0

seriously this is the LEAST Professional looking website considering it has a ton of money behind it. fuck this site.

3
MegaMagaMan13 3 points ago +3 / -0

Cross-posting from my thread: Here are the Second Step lesson plans from my classroom.

  1. Here are the lesson plans for the 20 lessons taught in 5th grade. I can also link the handouts we give to students if you want, but you can see those in the lesson plans. Thumbnails of the slideshow images are in the plans. https://pdfhost.io/v/J7.6Qasx6_Second_Step_Grade_5_Lesson_Plans

  2. Here is the full Kindergarten to 5th Grade Scope and Sequence of lessons. These are basically lesson summaries: https://pdfhost.io/v/1sp8rUePi_secondstepdigitalelementaryscopeandsequence

3
cryptoa 3 points ago +3 / -0

Just wait till students have to sign NDA's to go to the bathroom so they can't report any future anal rapeings.

3
barwhack 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lie. Copy. Distribute. List all of their home addresses with the distro data.

F these monsters.

3
never42 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sign it. Break it. Let them sue you. Yeah... Please, school board... Bring more attention to this.

3
Ocineaa 3 points ago +3 / -0

How the fuck is anything not classified need a damn NDA to view? Especially a fucking public school?!

3
witchism11 3 points ago +3 / -0

The taxpayers already OWN that material. They paid for it. Not the school board. I'm sure the curriculum can be found anyway from people whose kids go to school in counties that use it. In fact, there should be parents sharing the books and materials nationwide so every parent can view it WITHOUT permission from school boards.

3
CoronaChan 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone need to throw that up on a torrent.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
Space_Force 3 points ago +3 / -0

Sounds like more commie bullshit to me. Let's make 'em famous, boys!

3
IvIA6A 3 points ago +3 / -0

According to the district’s agreement with Second Step obtained by the Daily Caller, the curriculum is not subject to traditional Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws.

Why on earth would a district enter into such an agreement if the goal wasn't to exclude the parents from the education of their child?

2
Chick-Fil-A 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's the thing, unless they develop the curriculum themselves, they have to purchase it from a private organization, and if it's a private org making the content, it's protected by copyright, which is not subject to FOIA.

1
IvIA6A 1 point ago +1 / -0

They could provide those materials but they choose to keep parents in the dark. The school superintendents willfully lie about what is being taught and hide it. That is a disgrace, copywrite or not.

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
3
DonAlejoGarzaTamez 3 points ago +3 / -0

The curriculum should be public record

2
DocOneToo 2 points ago +2 / -0

That NDA would be unenforceable even in the most corrupt courts. That precedent has been set forever. Same goes with non-compete clauses.

2
Mrsattorney 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is so outrageous.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

NDA? Everything there not should be, but IS public information. Not only should nobody be signing that, they should be sqwawking about it there, and at every local radio and TV station. Who the hell do these people think they are?

2
MegaMagaMan13 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am a 5th grade teacher who currently has access to and teaches from the Second Step Curriculum.

I have signed no NDA of any kind.

What do you want to know about it?

3
TheTelltaleFly 3 points ago +3 / -0

Everything. Is it CRT? Is it gay/pedo grooming? Is it SJW activist training? Or is it just good old reading, writing, and arithmetic?

2
MegaMagaMan13 2 points ago +2 / -0

Its good old fashioned "what do you do when you feel sad?" stuff.

Counseling and emotion regulation stuff.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
Kanan_Jarrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since when do they care about the law?

2
KungPaoMcChicken 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just ignore NDA's. Most the time nobody enforces them. Just leak the contents online.

2
NotDangerousGame 2 points ago +2 / -0

Homeschool your kids.

2
HeartofStone 2 points ago +2 / -0

They are a regulating taxing body it should be public information.

2
4
NotAnotherNPC 4 points ago +4 / -0

"According to the district’s agreement with Second Step obtained by the Daily Caller, the curriculum is not subject to traditional Virginia Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) laws."

How the fuck is this legal if it's being used to teach in a public school?

2
EdisonHwy 2 points ago +2 / -0

How can the district slip by the public records provisions?

Something stinks.

1
NotAnotherNPC 1 point ago +1 / -0

They're shitting themselves....

2
BillsmafiaGG 2 points ago +2 / -0

We allow schooling power over children by ceding more and more ground over what is “learned” in school.

Nothing is “learned” in school.

Learning is something you do for yourself when you are curious, focused, and apply yourself to a task. No child should be sent to a public school without already knowing how to read, write, and do basic figuring with numbers. After that point, if you choose the public school route, instructors are useful as a guide for wider subject matter.

The illusion that learning somehow “comes from schools” is perpetuated and deepened when we force children into schools younger & younger, with fewer & fewer preconditions.

It almost doesn’t matter what the specific curriculum is. You can improve schooling in almost any community by abolishing “Pre-K” and requiring Grade 1 entrance exams.

2
Kekistan_United 2 points ago +2 / -0

aldous huxley did not intend to write a guide book...

2
Redpillmachine 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally illegal. Not even a lawyer but its a public school i could think of a million reasons

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
Lol_Garrus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck them, release it anyway.

2
redditadminssuckit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fake a signature that is illegible and obviously not yours and then make copies of whatever it is you are looking at. When they try to threaten you and show you the non-disclosure agreement tell him that's not your signature and obviously someone else signed it.

I guarantee these idiots are too stupid to film you signing it

2
Fussbudget 2 points ago +2 / -0

shit like this is why project veritas exists

2
Steady3 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fuck these "schools."

2
covok48 2 points ago +3 / -1

Can confirm. A friend asked for a curriculum for his daughter’s school and they made him jump though hoop after hoop until they relented 2 weeks after he first asked.

Not even bank security is that restrictive.

2
Dlrnemesis 2 points ago +2 / -0

Why in the fuck you would put up with that at your school?