3207
Comments (152)
sorted by:
2
Triple_Jabrony 2 points ago +2 / -0

Theyre so full of shit. Democrats are like a fucking world of warcraft race. Theyre born evil and theyre all the fucking same.

8
xBigCoffinHunter 8 points ago +8 / -0

flufferboy2004. 4doprsmorewhores.

I don’t know that my sides can take much more

14
FFL07SOT02 14 points ago +14 / -0

As excited as I am for the possibility of mistrial with prejudice I have lost faith in our system and won’t celebrate until Kyle walks

12
wiseracer 12 points ago +12 / -0

I've looked at the video repeatedly and I don't see it proving anything for either side. They're narrating it "see right there he drops the fire extinguisher..." - he did? There's like 8 pixels of nothing and about 3 seconds later I see a few pixels running. I work with graphics for a living, this isn't anything.

Do you all see this activity?

3
bidensmissingbrain 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's a Rorschach Test. The prosecution introduced it hoping that any jury members who might still be on their side will be poisoned with unconfirmable bias.

2
My2Cents 2 points ago +2 / -0

Rorschach to justify woke jurors' confirmation bias.

6
Bearing51 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, and nobody else does either.

13
RussianBot6969 13 points ago +13 / -0

Binger should be disbarred or, at minimum, sanctioned for his conduct in this case.

He won't be, of course, but he should be.

3
MerlynTrump 3 points ago +3 / -0

can the legislature investigate him? Or if we elect a new state AG in 2022.

2
RussianBot6969 2 points ago +2 / -0

Probably, not sure what the procedure would be in Wisconsin. The Wisconsin State Bar and/or State Supreme Court should have jurisdiction over ethics issues, as well.

5
OkieRedPiller 5 points ago +5 / -0

Duke Lacrosse case they were disbarred and sued

-4
snoopy3210 -4 points ago +3 / -7

Why are you afraid of the jury? The jury is ready to free Kyle and the jury is the people. A much better result than a state sponsored mistrial.

7
mojorisen 7 points ago +9 / -2

No, the jury isn't ready to free Kyle. It would have already been done if they were so ready. The longer it drags on, the more chance Kyle goes to prison for most of his adult life.

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

The mood has changed when they saw the evidence confirming he was only acting in self defense after being attacked and that he has never provoked them. The verdict must come from the jury or else the media will say he went Scott free on a technicality. Berger is working for an Intel agency intentionally introducing bad videos in order to get a mistrial. The security state is obsessed with Kyle and don’t want a clear result that would let us defend ourselves. Kyle must go to his lawyer and stop the mistrial request and get acquitted the right way. Be brave and do it for all of us.

2
mojorisen 2 points ago +2 / -0

This and the FBI doesn't like when people take out three of their informants within 30 minutes.

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0
  1. Yes! Bicep absolutely appears to be an informant (handgun)
  2. Also, I saw a man with a berret on the Jimmy Dore show. At one point he repeatedly attacked Kyle on that show. Jimmy didn't know Kyle and didn't understand. The man was clearly wearing a berret for the first time just to appear as left wing on a left wing show. Clearly an informant attacking Kyle ahead on the trial. He also attacked the bongalloos. I will try to find the show. A few months ago.
2
ovitz 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is not how real life works.

0
mojorisen 0 points ago +1 / -1

Evidently we don't share existence in the same clown world that i have been living in for the past year.

3
ovitz 3 points ago +3 / -0

You ever buy a car? It SHOULDN’T take 5-6+ hours. It shouldn’t even take 2. But it often does. It doesn’t mean the salesman is a dolt, they’re just following procedure. Now image 12 sales men, some of them dolts. Sometimes things just take time.

1
MerlynTrump 1 point ago +1 / -0

I heard in USSR it could take 10 years to get a car.

1
ovitz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ok.

5
Tejas_Pepe 5 points ago +7 / -2

If the jury had any fucking brains it would have taken them 5 minutes to come back with not guilty on all counts. That they are taking this long is bad for Kyle. A mistrial is most likely his best hope.

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are told about a imaginary backlash and riots after a non guilty verdict when we all know that it will look like the fake 50 states planned riots after Biden inauguration: totally created by police and only one guy attended

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
2
masterdrake 2 points ago +2 / -0

who cares? whichever way is most assuredly to free Kyle is the best way

1
snoopy3210 1 point ago +1 / -0

Precedent. It creates precedent in a clear jury case. Have you ever heard of it?

1
masterdrake 1 point ago +1 / -0

No i dont know what that is. I thought if they mistrial with predjudice then he gets off and they cant charge him again

1
ruffthesuspect 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fingerbinger? Shouldn't this have evolved to FlufferBoy?

5
orange_popcicle 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is some Phoenix Wright levels of bullshit.

13
AnonymousFrog 13 points ago +13 / -0

So they lied to the judge?

Prison for the prosecutors.

18
NecessaryOcelot 18 points ago +18 / -0

We'll find out in a couple hours what this judge does. I can't even fathom what else he could possibly need to declare a mistrial with prejudice.

6
Smooth 6 points ago +9 / -3

No we won’t. He won’t consider it unless jury comes back guilty. Then he’ll unfortunately just say “well the jury has spoken.” He’s got no balls and Binger has been playing him like a (skin)flute

2
no_money 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think if there is a hung jury he could declare a mistrial with prejudice. It would already be a mistrial so he wouldn't really be changing the outcome, and the state could appeal his decision which would (likely) result in it being reaffirmed and therefore protect his reputation.

0
peltast 0 points ago +2 / -2
  1. Is this the same judge that raised Kyle's bail to 2 million?

  2. Hasn't this judge already ignored a similar plea?

3
Smooth 3 points ago +3 / -0
  1. not sure but probably

  2. no this is the first the motion was formally brought

0
peltast 0 points ago +1 / -1

Thank you.

6
dadmda123 6 points ago +6 / -0

Kyle can appeal and iirc the Supreme Court in Wisconsin is republican

5
Smooth 5 points ago +6 / -1

Meanwhile he’d be rotting away in a prison cell. Not what I can justice

9
Vinc 9 points ago +10 / -1

You seem to be under the illusion that the Republican party represents you still

2
dadmda123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I don’t but I’m also not from the us so they already didn’t represent me

16
nomoreprinkles 16 points ago +16 / -0

Looks like someone should get disbarred

19
InfidelViking 19 points ago +19 / -0

Wait what did I just wake up to?? Holy wtf……it’s like Christmas morning but better because I had no idea this fucking gift was out there.

27
NotAQTardFaggot 27 points ago +28 / -1

This is EXACTLY why the prosecution tried every way to weasel out of showing this to the judge. The judge picked up on it, and yelled at them for fucking around.

18
WakingKnowledge 18 points ago +18 / -0

I dedicate this song to FINGERBANGER

5
FlufferBoy2004 5 points ago +6 / -1

Could you make that louder please. Louder. Until it changes key.

2
WakingKnowledge 2 points ago +2 / -0

MOAR VOLUME DAMMIT! MOAR!

52
deleted 52 points ago +52 / -0
48
BaldyGull 48 points ago +48 / -0

It os worse than that. They conjured up a crappy image that supposedly showed Rittenhouse pointing a gun at someone. That never happened. And they KNEW that never happened. They falsified evidence.

4
xBigCoffinHunter 4 points ago +4 / -0

And they charged the guy he supposedly pointed the gun at with another crime thereby taking him off the table as a witness. Those charges will be dropped. Book it.

30
IAmDisappoint 30 points ago +30 / -0

"it just plays weird"

  • fucking scumbag Fatlock
25
americandrunk 25 points ago +26 / -1

Someone doesn't want to win this case. Someone is masterfully throwing this case for dismissal by the judge.

7
Viewer01 7 points ago +7 / -0

Masterfully? No, everyone has picked up on their bull shit.

6
Qualityproduct 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yea. Doesn't a mistrial mean you have a new trial?

26
lostremote- 26 points ago +26 / -0

Mistrial with prejudice means hes free with no new trial.

12
americandrunk 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes, unless it is dismissed with prejudice. If it is dismissed with prejudice they cannot re-try Kyle.

28
orangemanwins202020 28 points ago +28 / -0

someone who knows law please answer...

so is the DA suppossed to turn in ALL evidence, even if it helps Kyle? are they obligated to?

11
MarginofFraud 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yes. The prosecution's job is to serve justice, not win a conviction. They aren't supposed to be trying to win the case (though all prosecutors really are). They are supposed to be serving truth and justice no matter the result. While prosecutors certainly want to win and this idea that they actually would serve justice rather than their own desire to win, the place where the rubber meets the road is their obligation to turn over any exculpatory evidence (known as Brady material) to the defense so that the defense can fairly present their innocence. By not turning over that evidence while knowingly having it, the prosecution would be in violation of their obligation to serve justice in one of the few and most important ways that obligation could actually be enforced. It's a huge no-no for the prosecution not to turn over this evidence and they could be disbarred or pursued for prosecutorial misconduct.

1
orangemanwins202020 1 point ago +1 / -0

do you think this will happen in this case?

1
MarginofFraud 1 point ago +1 / -0

In a just world sure. The evidence is there. But I'm not making predictions with how badly the judge has bungled this.

15
BaldyGull 15 points ago +16 / -1

Excuplatory evidence. Not only must that evidence be provided, I think withholding such evidence may be than other evidence.

28
Burkmcbork 28 points ago +28 / -0

Yes. It is a very serious matter. Keeping evidence that helps the defense is called “withholding exculpatory evidence”. It’s what got prosecutor Mike Nifong disbarred in the Duke Lacrosse trial.

11
catsfive 11 points ago +11 / -0

Something something Mueller and Corney

18
magapotus 18 points ago +18 / -0

They need to disbar this fucker, this is malicious for political reasons. He needs to rot in jail.

3
BigBadBrutus 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need to do more than upvote a buried post on a relatively unknown website.

Do regular people have the ability to get prosecutors disbarred? And if so, how?

We all know phone calls aren't going to do shit.

Guys, the government will not stop. Antifa and BLM are funded groups that work with our corrupt government hand in hand. Even if these groups fall out of favor, another group will soon be created.

This will happen again and it may be you or your loved one on trial next time, and there WON'T be this much video.

And we got lucky that the judge isn't an activist, but he certainly doesn't look young and the future is already brainwashed.

We need self defense back. Binger and Krause need to be disbarred.

11
aside 11 points ago +11 / -0

Brady rule

3
Gwoz8881 3 points ago +3 / -0

Which means...?

4
aside 4 points ago +4 / -0

The Brady Rule, named after Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), requires prosecutors to disclose materially exculpatory evidence in the government's possession to the defense. A "Brady material" or evidence the prosecutor is required to disclose under this rule includes any evidence favorable to the accused--evidence that goes towards negating a defendant's guilt, that would reduce a defendant's potential sentence, or evidence going to the credibility of a witness.

Since you don't seem to able to use a search engine

15
DickTick 15 points ago +15 / -0

Lol obviously

How could you possibly be expected to mount a proper defense if you don't have all the same evidence that they're going to use against you?

1
orangemanwins202020 1 point ago +1 / -0

what im asking is... lets say there is a video of something... can the DA just hide it somewhere as if it doesn't exist? or does he need to turn in everything... seems like a conflict of interest (well to win a case, but unethical)

1
AnonymousFrog 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like the January 6th videos.

8
American-Patriot 8 points ago +8 / -0

Some Phoenix Wright bullshit going on here

46
QuickMaths 46 points ago +46 / -0

Oh boy, I am so surprised by them withholding evidence, truly shocking…

Thats just the evidence they got caught withholding, who knows what else those two scumbags withheld.

18
Serulin 18 points ago +18 / -0

They chose not to look at Gage's phone for 1.

19
Dan_Backslide 19 points ago +19 / -0

They most likely withheld that jump kick an came forward, that they know who he is, and he offered to testify in exchange for immunity for other crimes he committed. Would have been interesting to have him called as a witness.

74
Jibideen 74 points ago +74 / -0

We found 900,000 pixels at 4am

17
IAmDisappoint 17 points ago +17 / -0

"there is no evidence of digital manipulation, it just plays weird"

7
OGTD1 7 points ago +8 / -1

Have to blow on the cartridge and tap on the side of the box to make it play…

33
NZ_Pede 33 points ago +33 / -0

Been reading some twatter threads and came across something fucking hilarious if true

https://twitter.com/BossHoggUSMC/status/1460773251643326469

Backdoor Binger may be more true than just a meme

7
Pepedom 7 points ago +7 / -0

Uhm...his middle name is Clair!?!? And he's a fluffer!? This is too good

8
IAmDisappoint 8 points ago +8 / -0

He is just career minded and wanted to get a head

4
yeldarb1983 4 points ago +5 / -1

pretty sure the judge got the head, but okay.

4
me-no-likely3 4 points ago +4 / -0

Status: I’ll believe it!

12
ModernKnight 12 points ago +12 / -0

4doorsmorewhores > flufferboy2004

4
yodayoda 4 points ago +4 / -0

You misspelled Backdoor Banger.

9
AbrahamLincoln 9 points ago +9 / -0

Which video was the doctored smudge photo from?

11
Xult 11 points ago +11 / -0

From the compressed video ! It appears they compressed the original video which they provided to the defence and then enlarged , therefore providing a lesser quality distorted photo, where they tried to say Kyle was pointing the gun before he actually did. It appears they witheld the original FBI footage because it proved Kyle's story.

3
DWAC 3 points ago +3 / -0

HD

26
c89631147e 26 points ago +26 / -0

Back in the day Binger would have already been tarred and feathered in the town square.

If this was BLM his house would have been burned down.

And conservatives wonder why they keep losing.

32
AlcoholicRetard 32 points ago +32 / -0

The government wants us dead and will lie, cheat and steal to do it.

18
Moebius 18 points ago +18 / -0

There's a story, 'bout a man named Brady...

Brady violation!

17
Flipakademsarepedos 17 points ago +17 / -0

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We knew this shady shit was going on and thisnconfirms it!!!!

36
MustafaJones 36 points ago +36 / -0

The prosecution is so dirty. They are like a fucking Batman villain at this point. Everyone involved in prosecuting Kyle needs to be disbarred after this.

7
Flipakademsarepedos 7 points ago +7 / -0

100% pede!

54
Fake_Snooze 54 points ago +55 / -1

If the HD video is truly favorable to the defense, it is a Brady violation for the prosecutors to withhold that evidence. If Kyle is found guilty, that violation is grounds to overturn the conviction.

23
Rommsey 23 points ago +23 / -0

A Brady violation doesn't care about the quality of evidence. It cares that the prosecution withheld any evidence from the defense. You are right on the overturn aspect.

7
Fake_Snooze 7 points ago +7 / -0

Are you sure? I thought Brady only applied to exculpatory evidence.

2
eagles_have_landed 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is exculpatory evidence. It proves kyle didn’t raise his gun and therefore destroying the State’s case in chief: provocation.

5
Rommsey 5 points ago +5 / -0

I see the distinction you’re making and yes you are right.

20
losiPig 20 points ago +20 / -0

The FBI aren't even that good at being criminals anymore. Have you noticed? All they have are the tools. Not the skills or talent. They're falling apart. And in for some shit - soon. #FBIisasshoe

9
acasper 9 points ago +9 / -0

They don’t need to be. They’ve got the blackmail material. Not even kidding about that. The new disregard for any semblance of deniability starts right after Epstein.

15
Ricky_CIA 15 points ago +15 / -0

The Jan 6th instigators, the RV bomb, the dipshit in a pickup with a fake as hell southern accent threatening an attack, the Glowie Boys in their matching sunglasses, watches and wardrobe from The Gap, the list goes on and on with how incompetent their gayops are becoming.

1
Schroeder09 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is a very good summary and super important post. It would be nice to have a comprehensive, running list of all their gayops starting at around 2015, but certainly since the steal or Epstein.

2
Junionthepipeline 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haven't heard a word about pickup truck guy since

2
glow-operator-2-0 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because they're dumb faggots who only know one trick to bully /blackmail.

Ever wonder why they went with waterboarding after their threats weren't enough?

Some of their targets literally have nothing left to lose m

13
15
peterstrzoked 15 points ago +15 / -0

Brady violations are to the DOJ/FBI what cooking fries are to a McDonalds fry cook.

I learned about what a Brady violation was following the Flynn trial.

2
PatriotPirate 2 points ago +2 / -0

have to admit I didn't keep up with the Flynn Trial. there's def something amiss there.

drop a link to a good summary if you have it handy. thx.

0
peterstrzoked 0 points ago +1 / -1

I followed it on the conservativetreehouse.com throughout the early part of 2017 through the end of Trumps first term.

It’s a great site with lots of details, well sourced and linked, etc, but a summary is hard to find, you gotta start reading (at least from there).

The good thing is, if you find a more recent article on a topic, Sundance will provide lots of links within it to his previous writings on the topics and you can really dive into it.

I dunno if this is the best place to start, but it’s ‘a’ place: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2021/10/12/tucker-carlson-interviews-general-michael-flynn-the-biggest-target-of-the-fourth-branch-of-government/

39
Mukzn 39 points ago +39 / -0

Drone Footage

The first half is what Littlebinger showed in low-quality, and the second half is the same clip in high quality.

It is QUITE the difference that anyone can see!

1
SaltiTaralli 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did you get the low resolution version? Was that played in court at all?

3
Fake_Snooze 3 points ago +3 / -0

This needs its own post!

13
holliday50 13 points ago +13 / -0

Just to clarify. The prosecution has been showing the high-res version to the court. So no, there is no better version that actually shows Kyle's gun (you can't see it at all).

The scandal here is that by providing the defense with a lower quality video, they weren't able to adequately prepare. This is why people on Twitter were able to point out details that the defense wasn't able to find, such as the fact that what the prosecution says is Kyle's right hand is really probably just a mirror as it's there before Kyle arrives and still there when he leaves. The Defense team's version was only 1/3rd the resolution of the State's, so there's no way they could see anything.

This is a Brady violation by the State. The motion to dismiss with prejudice addresses this issue along with the 5th Amendment violation and the previous violation of the court order.

2
orangemanwins202020 2 points ago +2 / -0

so what was the prosecutor arguing? that kyle pointed a gun at him? well so what, what does that have to do with anything? if his guy was pointed at the ground or something, would that make a difference?

sorry if this is a dumb question

1
holliday50 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prosecution is arguing that Kyle pointed his gun at Rosenbaum, therefore provoking him. Under Provocation law, he wouldn't have the privilege of self-defense. It's ridiculous because they had zero witnesses that testified to it, so the ONLY evidence they had in the record is this blurry drone footage that shows Kyle's left elbow bending. What the Prosecution says is Kyle's right hand is actually a mirror or some other object. Also, the left elbow being bent indicates that if Kyle would be pointing his gun, he'd suddenly be handling his gun left-handed, where he'd been handling it right-handed in every other image/video.

2
orangemanwins202020 2 points ago +2 / -0

thanks for explaining

3
LauriThorne 3 points ago +3 / -0

At first his entire prosecution was predicated on Kyle being a mass shooter faking self defense. When that immediately fell apart Binga threw a hail Mary by trying to claim this video shows Kyle pointing his gun at the Ziminskies, who are off screen and did not testify, which provoked the pedo into attacking.

Binger is the scum of the earth not fit to tie any of our boots.

4
IHatePedophiles 4 points ago +4 / -0

I still can't even see where I'm supposed to be looking TBH. Can you help me out?

2
knx2 2 points ago +2 / -0

i have the same problem. if your video is such shit that you can say he is or he isn't it should have been thrown out. How the hell can you tell where something is pointed to from that angle anyway.

15
flyover_deplorable 15 points ago +15 / -0

Has anyone asked, "how in the fuck did the fbi deploy their drone at the exact moment to catch this?!" I assume they launched because the drone is ascending from very low altitude in the beginning of the clip.

7
kornesque 7 points ago +7 / -0

My favorite part is the timeframe in which these videos were suddenly found. Super cute.

6
SaltiTaralli 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's all such bullshit.

20
MondayCoupleIsDead 20 points ago +20 / -0

FLUFFERBOY2004! 😂😂😂

2
Dan_Backslide 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sounds like Binger enjoys ripping some dick dingers.

-7
SaveUsSCOTUS -7 points ago +6 / -13

Old news they talked about this over the weekend briefly. Court just said they’d take it under advisement

2
SaltiTaralli 2 points ago +2 / -0

This is different from the pixel/algorithm dispute.

15
cjcivicx 15 points ago +17 / -2

The motion was discussed not filed til yesterday...

-3
TheMadManDidItAgain -3 points ago +3 / -6

What does "yesterday" mean? You post this on 11/17/2021 at 12:25am EST, but it is also 11/16/2021 at 11:25pm CST. So, when you say 'Yesterday', are you talking about it being filed on the 16th or the 15th?

Friggin' time zones...

9
Long_time_lurker 9 points ago +9 / -0

Look at the other sticky thread, the papers are dated Monday 11/15.

8
SaltiTaralli 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's dated at the top.

4
cjcivicx 4 points ago +6 / -2

I'm in Alaska, friendo, 830pm my time.

18
MountainMan95 18 points ago +18 / -0

Criminals. Arrest them.

17
publius1788 17 points ago +17 / -0

Is this big or just being overblown? Legal layman here.

6
Fake_Snooze 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's a written motion that was filed two days ago. The prosecutor usually has (depending on WI Rules of Court) about 10-20 days to respond. Defense may file another response, ask for a hearing, more arguing, etc. After all that, the judge makes a decision.

29
Long_time_lurker 29 points ago +29 / -0

It's a Brady and due process violation, one of several significant infringements of Kyle's rights perpetrated by the persecution in this case.

There are also people pointing out that Fatlock made a comment to the effect of "our version is better" in court, on video. That may help establish that this was a knowing violation.

12
DWAC 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yes. And Charifisi perked up when he heard that. I took note and I'm not a lawyer.

5
kornesque 5 points ago +5 / -0

I took note but for some reason did not make the obvious connection until reading this motion. How could this not be considered criminal?

2
WestCoastG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Got a time stamp?

1
orangemanwins202020 1 point ago +1 / -0

its posted in the stick up top, one of the thread on abc, at like 130 mark

3
DWAC 3 points ago +3 / -0

I do not. It was the day they had the witness that "enhanced" the still image testify. So late last week. The defense objected to the use of the evidence and the judge came down to get a better view of the TV. The prosecution didn't have the video ready so the defense offered their video on the big gal's laptop. They played it and the prosecution was rambling about how their version was better and something about the TV image quality and then fetched their version. It all seemed extremely shady and now we know why. At some point the bald attorney smirked and shook his head and walked out of frame and I thought it was odd. I think he knew at that moment that there was an HD version the defense hadn't seen and that's why in the motion filed it mentioned Attorney Wisco had to request the prosecution's version of the video. They knew exactly what to ask for.

3
Dan_Backslide 3 points ago +3 / -0

So between intentionally providing lower quality video evidence to the defense, violating his fifth amendment rights like how Rosenbaum violated little boys, and violating the judge’s rulings by attempting to introduce evidence that was not allowed, combined with the fact that the prosecuting attorneys are experienced attorneys and not new, I’d conclude that these violations are deliberate and flagrant on their part. Egregious to the point where I think they need to be referred to the BAR Association for disciplinary action.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
13
kent 13 points ago +13 / -0

This would be great news to wake up to tomorrow.

30
Correndo [S] 30 points ago +30 / -0

This is an outright criminal action on behalf of Fingerbinger and Lunchbox.

14
MAGAMAN4EVA 14 points ago +14 / -0

Fatlock*

2
Ergonofvaxeenus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jaba D. Hutt .esq

5
Ricky_CIA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Tubby and the Faggot.