2151
Comments (46)
sorted by:
59
I_Love_45-70_Gov 59 points ago +60 / -1

Does this mean the vaccinations are possibly bad for humans?

Asking for an ungodly stupid NPC.....

15
Brucesky420 15 points ago +15 / -0

No, that's wrongthink friend

oh and we ask that you PLEASE totally ignore that the FDA just filed to make them not have to share any data from FOIAs until 2076 Weird that they would do this right around the time this data is revealed

45
secretbern 45 points ago +45 / -0

Everyone keeps saying 6, which is a small number. It was a 40% increase. 40% is not a small number

41
iamherefortheluls 41 points ago +43 / -2

22,000 recipients. whether its 21 vaccinated vs 14 deaths un-vaccinated deaths, its still too few to base an assertion that the vaccines are harmful. However the attempt to manipulate the data is damning and must not be overlooked or forgiven.

And of course it proves that their vaccines are, at best, useless.

21
ModernKnight 21 points ago +21 / -0

Plus, this was a pretty short-term trial, it doesn't take into account anything long-term.

15
DinosaurAlert 15 points ago +18 / -3

And side effects from the vaccine are rare- it is just that a bad case of Covid is even rarer. If there is a 1/5000.chance of myocarditis for a 20 year old, a 20,000 person test wouldn’t uncover that.

15
FrostedCricketFlakes 15 points ago +15 / -0

That 1/5000 number was 1/10000 a couple months ago. Every week since the chance has increased.

9
evenbiggerchubbys 9 points ago +9 / -0

Rare side effects? That’s news. The hospitals aren’t reporting 90 percent of adverse reactions so it’s not a rare occurrence

2
DinosaurAlert 2 points ago +2 / -0

The hospitals aren’t reporting 90 percent of adverse reactions so it’s not a rare occurrence

The vaccine sucks to take, and almost many I know who took it were miserable for a week. I consider a bad reaction to either the vaccine or covid to be one that puts you in the hospital or causes long term issues.

For people around 60 or older, taking the vaccine is prob less risk than getting covid. That's assuming the normal dose though, not playing russian roulette for the rest of your life with boosters.

For young people under 40, no fucking mathematical reason to take the vaccine. Even though bad vaccine side effects are rare, bad covid side effects are rarer.

6
evenbiggerchubbys 6 points ago +6 / -0

There’s really no mathematical reason for anyone to take it. Early treatment for anyone, including older people would have saved at least half of them.
The majority of people who have died were in nursing homes and died from neglect and dehydration. Now they are having strokes from the clot shot and hospitals hide the cause.
All lies from day one. There is no reason to get untested mystery juice jammed into your body. Not one

3
Megascandal 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ivermectin makes all the math very, very easily. Extremely safe and effective. Doesn't give the nazis in big pharma or washington or the MSM the money they so hoped for.

They've been lying about their numbers from the start. The vaccines are likely deadlier in all age groups than covid is. 95% or more of the covid deaths were with false positive tests or someone wanting a payout saying they had a flu like symptom and putting the death as covid.

1
Weallseethetruth 1 point ago +2 / -1

I'd say 1/5,000 is a pretty high fucking number!! I wouldn't take that chance!!

1
DinosaurAlert 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd take that chance if the risk of covid was 1/500. But it isn't for me.

5
zuccherina 5 points ago +5 / -0

This is untrue. If that's the number by which we have FDA approval of a vaccine, then it's statistically significant enough on which to base a "harmful" categorization. If there were more deaths in the vaccinated than in the unvaccinated, it means the vaccine is not increasing your odds of survival but actually the other way around - you are more likely to die with the vaccine. These are absolutely important points and I think we need to hit back on the same metrics. This is their data, use it against them.

5
BelfordBob 5 points ago +5 / -0

How many deaths from the vaccine for swine flu before they stopped it? Wasn’t it like 5 or something? If there’s ANY chance you can die from this vaccine at the very LEAST it shouldn’t be mandated to take for ANYONE!! Now they want the kids to take it and the fact the corrupt FDA is considering approval for boosters is mind blowing.

2
DoesItWorkAlready 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here's some math from R. The increased deaths from the jab aren't statistically significant. The sample size would need to be 3x that of the actual trial to achieve p=0.05.

But that itself is a problem. One should only approve a drug if the jab reduces death in a statistically significant way. At this point that's likely impossible.

https://pastebin.com/i2XpBcQp

https://archive.md/ibTyn

1
evenbiggerchubbys 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s still only approved for use under an EUA

3
FrostedCricketFlakes 3 points ago +3 / -0

6 deaths, there should be more non-fatal harm also not reported, some of which might have become fatal after the study. The study was very poorly done, including firing a whistleblower who had previously tried to fix issues within.

https://archive.ph/rHbrE https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj.n2635

Since Jackson reported problems with Ventavia to the FDA in September 2020, Pfizer has hired Ventavia as a research subcontractor on four other vaccine clinical trials (covid-19 vaccine in children and young adults, pregnant women, and a booster dose, as well an RSV vaccine trial

Pfizer's study on children had mentioned individuals who "chose not to continue." At least one of them was booted from the study because of serious side effects, they chose to hide. These studies were done by the same company.

2
CUNN1NG 2 points ago +2 / -0

Therefore, if it's too few to determine vaccines are harmful then it is too few to determine they are NOT harmful.

2
UsernameChexOut 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't even pick up a dresser from IKEA without being harassed by some paperwork Nazi because 2 kids in Europe killed themselves by being dumbasses. But a vaccine that kills X number of people that you need to take if you don't want to live under a bridge is ok I guess? lol

16
magafren 16 points ago +16 / -0

The infuriating thing is that these kids don't even NEED more immune response to Covid, they just shrug it off.

My wife and I both got Covid last summer, it was the severe strain too and it benched both of us for like 10 days. Meanwhile our daughter had the sniffles for half a day and that was all. Highest temp was like 99.1

THEY ARE POISONING KIDS

15
PickleSticks [S] 15 points ago +15 / -0

Yea, i dont even get why theyre doing kids, its ridiculous, the only kids ive seen die from covid had something like leukemia or they were fat as fuck

2
talltellmanson 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well there is evidence that it essentially sterilizes women by preventing placental development.

Question is, how long does that last exactly?

2
zigmund_fraud 2 points ago +2 / -0

558 kids in the 0 to 17 year old age range have died with COVID in the US in total. What they're doing is criminal.

8
TrumpIsMyyPresident 8 points ago +8 / -0

21 deaths out of how many ppl in the trial aka what %??

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
InTheArmsOfThePepe 2 points ago +2 / -0

^ This!

I'm all for questioning the incentives and biases of Big Pharma, but maintaining proper context is a must if we want to come to any plausible conclusions.

1
Sick_of_the_bs 1 point ago +1 / -0

22,000 participants in each group, so just under 0.001% fatality for the Pfizer group.

Edit: I math'd wrong. It's a 0.1% fatality rate.

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

0.01%, about 1/1000 odds. Your number is the correct fraction but need to x100 to make it a %.

Those are not small odds. Would you play Russian Roulette if it was 1/1000, or 1/500?

Then consider, they only followed patients for a few months. Unless risk of death only occurred immediately (we've already seen examples that it isn't), you have to assume it increases with longer time of observation. Then you have to consider the problems besides death. Other diseases or severe injuries may double or triple the chances. And many of us also care about less severe side effects. I don't need to trash my health, even in a lighter way that does not cause overt disease and injury. The odds then... perhaps 100%?

2
Sick_of_the_bs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Approximately 0.1% or 0.095% to be exact. we both math'd wrong. (Multiply by 100 to make a percent).

2
AJoeDD 2 points ago +2 / -0

What's wrong with me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2
Sick_of_the_bs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I did the same thing. Hahahah!!!! Stupid mistake.

1
madagea 1 point ago +1 / -0

Dr Scott Youngblood goes through quite a bit of info in this video.He is time limited so he goes through quite a few statistics in a shortish space of time. https://odysee.com/@BoredCat:b/Dr.-Scott-Youngblood-MD---More-Vaccinated-Deaths-than-Unvaccinated-based-on-the-Pfizer-Ramdomized-Controlled-Trial-(November-3-2021,-San-Diego---County-Board-of-Supervisors):5

3
LoobintheToobin 3 points ago +3 / -0

Short video of side effects from trials, “We Want to Be Seen, Heard and Believed”: https://rumble.com/vj4g1p-we-want-to-be-seen-heard-and-believed.html One told by doctor “Get used to being handicapped”

3
CUNN1NG 3 points ago +3 / -0

And they requested the FDA not release the 12-15 age group because it was even more damning to their cause. They act as if it never even happened. Statistically, there shouldn't be hardly any deaths in any less than 65 demographic with fewer than several hundred thousand participants.

2
Sick_of_the_bs 2 points ago +2 / -0

I understand it's a low mortality rate (0.001%), but why lie? What else are the withholding? Why give it to children & the healthy who have the same mortality rate with Covid?

2
Destroy_WithLove 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fauci is among the worst humans who've ever lived. He's in the same category as Joseph Mengele, the sadists in charge of Imperial Japan's Unit 731 (the biological/chemical weapons experimentation lab), and the architects of every genocide.

Think that's an exaggeration?

https://timcast.com/news/exclusive-faucis-niaid-funding-island-of-monkeys-in-south-carolina-used-for-horrific-maximum-pain-experiments/

2
Inevitable-Grape 2 points ago +2 / -0

Idk how people can honestly trust these pharmaceutical companies. People know full well they are all scumbags. Fear is one hell of a drug.

When I was dragging all these "experts" who have shown their sheer hypocrisy and double standards on Boomerbook I was accused of not using my critical thinking skills. I was like using your critical thinking skills does not involve taking people at their word just bc they've been deemed experts.

1
RandArrow 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anybody got a primary source? Twice as many people dying in vaccine group than control group is massive.

3
PickleSticks [S] 3 points ago +3 / -0

Someone also posted this, it probably got lost in the sauce, seems to be more detailed https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/more-people-died-in-the-key-clinical?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=post_embed&utm_medium=web

2
RandArrow 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks, found the FDA on there. Very scary.

1
murph1953 1 point ago +1 / -0

Pfizer's CEO looks like the Sopranos. Hey..Tony, give'em da'jab