322
Comments (77)
sorted by:
61
deleted 61 points ago +61 / -0
58
medicpatriot 58 points ago +58 / -0

Don't be surprised if the feds try something. If they do, we have to come out in MASSIVE protest. No pussy "we have work" excuses. The tide is on our side even with normies now. Also, they see our side is energized again after the demoralization campaign since January. Expect them to try to squash that.

10
Kekintosh2020 10 points ago +10 / -0

24/7 demoralization campaign. Literally thousands of keyboard fags spending probably billions for this psyop

51
QT31416 51 points ago +54 / -3

Nope - it was dismissed with prejudice.

26
10
thehumbleme 10 points ago +10 / -0

Down to the second. This needs more upvotes.

3
WillHammer 3 points ago +3 / -0

Done

1
Linnaeus 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's down. What was it? Is there a mirror on Rumble?

5
Comntrinchief 5 points ago +5 / -0

Judge approves defendant’s request that all charges are dropped with prejudice with no objection from the prosecution.

11
deleted 11 points ago +11 / -0
27
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 27 points ago +28 / -1

It's not a federal crime.

16
NOTWOKE 16 points ago +16 / -0

when has that stopped them?

2
anotherthing 2 points ago +2 / -0

I called this. They're going to investigate Kyle Rittenhouse for violating the rights of Rosenbaum, Grosskruetz, and Huber. They'll claim they were just exercising their First Amendment Rights and Kyle was keeping them from free exercise thereof.

9
FancyNancy 9 points ago +9 / -0

How is that the case? I saw the jury say not guilty. Can it also be dismissed with prejudice?

14
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 14 points ago +14 / -0

Yes, that is what you do after a not guilty verdict.

8
Lurker404 8 points ago +8 / -0

They did the same with Chauvin. The feds made up their own lawsuits for "civil rights" violations.

1
MAGA_Argent_Crusade 1 point ago +1 / -0

Prejudice? That is racist! RREEEEEEEEEEEE

39
here2red 39 points ago +39 / -0

Jery Nader opened his big fat mouth

"This heartbreaking verdict is a miscarriage of justice and sets a dangerous precedent which justifies federal review by DOJ. Justice cannot tolerate armed persons crossing state lines looking for trouble while people engage in First Amendment-protected protest."

34
MikeHoncho6942 34 points ago +34 / -0

So that means I can burn a car dealership and as long as I say I was protesting it’s ok and not arson. Good,glad we got that cleared up nadler, you fucking oompah loompah looking motherfucker.

10
Porkbut 10 points ago +10 / -0

Break a window in the capitol, decades in prison. Burn someones business down, thats "protected speech". These corrupt lunatics need to be cast down from their ivory towers, he literally thinks hes our master. Do you all agree with him?

11
Cryptops 11 points ago +11 / -0

*break a window in the capitol, get shot and killed.

3
Porkbut 3 points ago +3 / -0

Truth

3
hey_spike 3 points ago +3 / -0

You left out speaking at a school board meeting, and threatening to vote them out.

10
conservativeyuppie 10 points ago +10 / -0

Lmao is this legit???

6
Build_Back_Bankrupt 6 points ago +6 / -0

It is, he tweeted it.

6
Judiwont 6 points ago +6 / -0

He didn’t cross state lines with a gun though??

10
here2red 10 points ago +10 / -0

I know that, you know that. But your gov't is crazy.

4
Porkbut 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not crazy, they know what they are doing. Its EVIL, corruption laid bare

5
FamburgerHelper 5 points ago +5 / -0

Sounds like Gaige Grossguts is the one who needs to be charged then.

4
OccasionalCortex21 4 points ago +4 / -0

aNtIfA iSnT rEAL

34
MrMcGreenGenes 34 points ago +34 / -0

While sitting members of Congress are openly slandering him? Good luck with that.

30
generated_name 30 points ago +30 / -0

The best they would be able to do is try a civil rights claim. The only problem is that all of the people killed were white and Kyle is mixed race. That would be a strange argument to hear in court.

14
jiminycricket1941 14 points ago +18 / -4

Oy vey. Not all of them were white.

6
deleted 6 points ago +10 / -4
4
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 4 points ago +8 / -4

Sorry to break it to you, but jews are white.

9
2008RonPaul2012 9 points ago +12 / -3

Not according to Jews, sometimes, when it suits them.

2
pepeConductor 2 points ago +5 / -3

There is a jewish race as well as white adherents of judaism. Most people that are ethnic jews do not identify as white.

0
M8kMdlErthGr8Again 0 points ago +2 / -2

Ethnicity is not race. They are white.

-1
pepeConductor -1 points ago +2 / -3

I wish I could also post without reading the comment I am replying to, or thinking about the content of my reply.

21
Winner45 21 points ago +21 / -0

They can charge him with federal crimes (not murder.) they’ll have to scrape the bottom of the barrel to find one, it will probably be like a vague hate crime “intimidation” or some shit. The irs will definitely be looking at his and his attorneys taxes for decades.

7
EvilGuy 7 points ago +7 / -0

No they will be looking until 2022 when we start to unfuck this whole fucked up deep state from top to bottom.

17
JiggsawCalrissian 17 points ago +17 / -0

Can't happen. Take your loss with grace and fuck yourselves commies

5
Mintap 5 points ago +5 / -0

"...with grace" LOL

13
uniformist 13 points ago +13 / -0

Oh, they investigate for "violating the victims' civil rights".

Can't see this being a winner for the feds.

8
ChuckedBeef 8 points ago +8 / -0

It's time to put these crooks down. Garland belongs in prison.

2
MastaJoda 2 points ago +3 / -1

About 99% of DC deserves death by public stoning

5
feebleguy 5 points ago +8 / -3

Won't be able to. Judge granted the MISTRIAL with Prejudice as well. Double Jeopardy is in play.

2
Judiwont 2 points ago +2 / -0

When did the judge grant the mistrial with prejudice?

2
1
Comntrinchief 1 point ago +1 / -0

3:18:30 to be exact

5
Skeeter_N_CO 5 points ago +5 / -0

I don't think double jeopardy applies between state and federal courts.

2
EvilGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Best they can do is try to come up with some bullshit. There are so many laws on the books they can always find something to charge anyone with. However it is going to backfire on them.

2
SilentGuardian 2 points ago +2 / -0

You are correct.

5
deleted 5 points ago +5 / -0
3
Choppermagic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even federal prosecutors don't want to embarrass themselves like those local ones.

3
one_cool 3 points ago +3 / -0

How is that possible?

Tis the season for communist treason.

3
Mintap 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yep, Rittenhouse was obstructing an ongoing FBI matter.

3
SilentGuardian 3 points ago +3 / -0

I was waiting for them to arrest him once the not guilty was read. These mother f'ckers will try to get him on federal charges like violation of civil rights or some shit. Our entire government is corrupt.

3
Tweedlethree 3 points ago +3 / -0

This will be a step to far.

2
d_bokk 2 points ago +3 / -1

It'd be something gay like 'civil right violations' for not allowing a convicted child rapist to express his first amendment right to threaten and attempt to kill Rittenhouse.

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
South_Florida_Guy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I had thought they would try to pull some bullshit like this

2
cjcivicx 2 points ago +2 / -0

By who? The same people that slandered an innocent man for over a year?

Yeah, if they thought they weren't losing yet, wait until they try to federally charge someone that was found not guilty by 12 Americans. Not 12 judges, not 12 lawyers, not 12 congressmen.

AMERICANS!

1
JackAubreyRN 1 point ago +1 / -0

The idiots never learn.

1
turdinthepunch 1 point ago +1 / -0

please give this case more attention.

1
Saltyminer11 1 point ago +1 / -0

Seems that they continue to overreach.

1
PewPew_ThaDuK 1 point ago +1 / -0

never gonna happen

1
Badradness 1 point ago +1 / -0

FUCK AROUND AND FIND OUT, COMMIE TRAITOR FILTH

1
Lol_Garrus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fucking try fed fag bois. We fucking dare you.

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Niche that hog wash talk. Double Jeopardy is illegal in this country. FED's Have No Standing.

1
LawAbidingCitizen1 1 point ago +1 / -0

They have standing if they want it

1
Trumpdidit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Actually, they don't. Only in fabrication, not under legal analyst...

1
LawAbidingCitizen1 1 point ago +1 / -0

Legality doesn’t matter anymore. They don’t care.