3489
Comments (828)
sorted by:
402
N7fury 402 points ago +411 / -9

Many here have warned about Lin Wood being a grifter. It sounds like he's actually a scumbag

257
based_trekkie 257 points ago +263 / -6

Kenosha Kid Konfirms: Lin Wood is a Fucking Grifter!

82
Magabirdlady2 82 points ago +82 / -0

yeah...

96
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 96 points ago +97 / -1

Trump and General Flynn need to come out and discuss Lin Wood and Sidney Powell. Where are they, by the way? Haven’t heard from them in a while.

77
War_Hamster 77 points ago +77 / -0

I did see a recent Powell interview.

But you're right. If Lin Wood is a confirmed grifter, we cannot trust him on anything and he was in the inner circle for some important stuff.

71
Happyazz84 71 points ago +71 / -0

Yeah, that guy seemed to be at the epicenter of basically all of the hopium during the election. Scumbag.

61
KingOfTards 61 points ago +62 / -1

I never trusted him. He had 40 years of donations to Democrats. Shills were promoting him. This place is infested.

21
LongDongDonald420x69 21 points ago +22 / -1

Infested. Perfect word for it.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +1 / -3
37
WiseOldOwl 37 points ago +37 / -0

Lin Wood seemed like he was a rising hero. Then he got really goddamn weird.

Then I saw him speak on the stream of some event. He came off like a televangelist trying to sell you a condo in heaven.

There are lawyers who try to jump in the spotlight to play champion, but really are just mercenaries in a hero coat.

He's one of those, or he's crazy. One or the other.

17
2020riggedelection 17 points ago +17 / -0

At best he’s just a grifter at worst he’s a democrat plant.

10
ViaToil 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yeah, I was good with Lin Wood at first, myself but, as it went on he kept ramping it up and really did start getting weird vibe, I remember I had prayed for him to humble himself back down a few times and just started not really paying attention to him any longer. You are right, he started coming off as a televangelist, again no humble about him any longer, cringy and arrogant :/

4
SeeWithYourMind 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sounds like Lin Wood is a kindred spirit with that Avenati dirtbag

2
WhiteTrashJesus 2 points ago +2 / -0

His father beat his mother to death. Thats why he decided to become a lawyer. I think he means well I just think he ignored his responsibilities by dooming too hard after the steal

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
-8
JackLemon -8 points ago +5 / -13

The slob Sloppy Steve Bannon was by far the biggest source of that and still is.

9
SFSilentNoMore 9 points ago +10 / -1

Steve Bannon is a legend - quite the genius.

is he physically polished - not at all but is brain is no joke

7
oldhankdonald 7 points ago +7 / -0

War room separated from Lin Wood. Hannity used to push Lin Wood for years.

24
DonttrustChina 24 points ago +26 / -2

I'm not sure he's a grifter, or just CRAZY.

Q made a lot of boomers go bananas.

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +10 / -1

Entirely possible. I know some of those crazy people.

I followed the whole Q saga, and always thought it was plausible. It appears to not have stood up to the test of time so far, which is rather disappointing. It was a nice story.

11
JesusisKing 11 points ago +11 / -0

it was really just narrative shaping but the drama and the scale blew a lot of peoples minds. I am a lot like Kyle and thought we lived in a great nation. maybe it was once that way but it is clear now we would have to make it so ourselves.

7
BillsmafiaGG 7 points ago +7 / -0

The Q stories were never more or less plausible than any political story.

I feel that political bombshells come from mostly ordinary events where not much has changed… but professional fiction writers pretend it really did change and the real action comes from convincing people after the fact.

Our major fantasy fiction franchises seem credible because they are familiar. Not because they are true.

If our major political parties are ghost writers respectively recreating the Star Trek & Star Wars universes, then why is Q less credible just because it is telling the equivalent of an ALF sitcom?

With enough traction, the Q narrative always had a chance to come to life. After all, a complete fiction about Russia was embodied in a 2-year impeachment.

[Durr-dit: if the facts pan out, that’s preferable, but my point is that’s not even necessary to move the needle]

7
DonttrustChina 7 points ago +10 / -3

It was never plausible.

I mean the basic idea, there's pedos in the government, yes, that we all know. But you didn't have to have secret inside info for that, the Epstein stuff was known about in redpilled circles long before he was brought down.

But "Frazzledrip" and adrenochrome (which doesn't remotely work like that) and "the storm" and a secret investigation Mueller was REALLY running on Trump's behalf...spy fiction. And the notion that some guy had all this info and was just fucking posting it on 4chan? Come the fuck on.

Q was always an obvious LARP. The question, the only relevant question, is whether it's some faggot 4chan troll who just wanted to see what he could get people to believe, got in way over his head, and had to tell more and more elaborate lies to keep from being found out, or whether it was a deliberately planted psyop by the Dems/deep state to keep us "trusting the plan", chasing shadows, and looking like crazy people all the while.

Qanon and its consequences have been a disaster for the boomer race.

6
Kamalas_a_Bitch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Q was never right or wrong it was the high profile hopium dealers/ grifters that were wrong and many of us got addicted to the hopium rush in our denial/grief/anger that the 2020 election was stolen and our desire that something would be done about it.

2
Examiner1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was a giant LARP and escape from reality for a lot of people. Time to move on.

6
FormerLibtard94 6 points ago +6 / -0

Nah - Kyle just explicitly explained that he is a grifter.

He’s a grifter.

Not was.

Is.

5
Whitespace 5 points ago +5 / -0

Q conspiracy: Lin Wood is Q.

takes off tinfoil hat Just sayin'.

0
poopsalad 0 points ago +1 / -1

no. c0demonkey is behind q. lin wood is just riding the movement to benefit his financial position

11
Harper42190 11 points ago +11 / -0

I think people are very confused here. I do think he's a grifter no doubt however people are blind to the David Hancock angle. Lin Wood raised the money and paid the bail and 500k in legal fees for Kyle. David Hancock is now using Kyle to bash Lin Wood. If you don't believe me, just look up the bullshit Hancock is tied up in and what happened between him and Lin.

9
War_Hamster 9 points ago +9 / -0

Thanks for the perspective. I'll try to get caught up on Hancock. I hadn't even heard of him until last week.

12
Harper42190 12 points ago +12 / -0

Lin talks here about it and Kyle is smearing Lin because Hancock is telling him this bullshit. Let's remember Kyle is 18 and doesn't really know better.

I by no means support wood, I hate what he did to the stop the steal movement and his Q BS but Kyle is being used by Hancock, it's sad.

https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7450

9
XlDEN 9 points ago +11 / -2

Oh, he wasn’t in an “inner circle” of anything. He just glommed onto opportunities to grift, then spewed a lot of nonsense.

22
WassermanSchultz 22 points ago +25 / -3

I still trust Powell because of her work with Gen. Flynn, but wowee - that Kraken stuff..

3
Kamalas_a_Bitch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Release the Kraken Sydney!! …still waiting…two more weeks

2
V2021 2 points ago +3 / -1

She didn’t save Flynn. She was more like a controlled opp plant. Wouldn’t surprise me if she was CIA operator. Or FBI.

1
QLARP 1 point ago +2 / -1

Flynn needed a pardon what did Powell do?

12
thunderstorm 12 points ago +13 / -1

Powell doesn't seem to show up anywhere there's money. Lin Wood definitely does.

12
KingOfTards 12 points ago +18 / -6

Trump never hired Linn Wood dumbass. Powell brought in Linn Wood and it was Trump that distanced himself from her legal services.

3
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 3 points ago +9 / -6

You know how I know you are a recently reformed leftist? Because you are easily triggered, and feel the need to lash out and insult people who haven’t even engaged you, directly. (Also, you are extremely ill-informed, which is the hallmark of a leftist.)

Trump endorsed Lin Wood. Invited him to the White House, multiple times, and appeared on stage with him, around the time of the 2020 election. I never said he hired him—- dumbass.

-2
KingOfTards -2 points ago +6 / -8

Oh let me play?

You know how I know you are a reformed leftist? Because you don't even know the history of Trump and his relationship with Linn but yet you demand he publically denounce and explain his relationship.

Get some more accounts there TDS boy.

3
Ghostof_PatrickHenry 3 points ago +5 / -2

Oh ok. So you’re a troll. My mistake.

1
doug2 1 point ago +6 / -5

You know how I know your gay? You sucked my dick last night! Fag!

1
DickTick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Now now..... You always say some fucking retarded shit around here and almost every comment section you comment in..... Which is exactly why we've always said that "it was right there in your username the whole time".......

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
11
doug2 11 points ago +13 / -2

Powell is 100% a patriot of the highest order. Wood lost a lot of good will with me tonight. It's ok to focus on the cause, but not at the expense of your client

7
PromiseImNotASpook 7 points ago +7 / -0

Just tonight? Not all of the other grifting that Wood has been doing?

4
Harper42190 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think people are very confused here. I do think he's a grifter no doubt however people are blind to the David Hancock angle. Lin Wood raised the money and paid the bail and 500k in legal fees for Kyle. David Hancock is now using Kyle to bash Lin Wood. If you don't believe me, just look up the bullshit Hancock is tied up in and what happened between him and Lin.

4
Examiner1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

That's the only good thing Wood has done. He also spent a ton of time telling conservatives not to vote in any follow-up election, dealt a ton of fake hopium conspiracy nonsense, and also claimed to be the second coming of Christ. He's insane.

2
Harper42190 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree.

23
LongDongDonald420x69 23 points ago +23 / -0

Ya'll better pick up that phone... 'Cos I fuckin' called it

11
Darkheartisland 11 points ago +17 / -6

Trust the plan

44
unclebobinator 44 points ago +46 / -2

I called it ages ago and the faggots here down voted me to oblivion and called me a shill

Get fucked losers, I was right all this time.

Don't trust lawyers ever. Especially obviously clout chasing onea

15
MAGA1775 15 points ago +19 / -4

Same here. I've been right about everything since the 2020 steal. The seized servers, SCOTUS, Lin Wood, Sidney Powell, Barr, the AZ audit, etc.

Yet for all of those I was also shouted down as a "shill", "doomer", and "commie."

It honestly hurts seeing how many people continually fall for all the lies, false hopium, and grifting.

I used to think our side was full of logical and critical thinkers, but the past year made me realize that we have just as many people who only operate largely on emotions like the left. They'll yell "SHILL" or "DOOMER" at anything they don't want to hear just like the left shrieks "RACIST" when they don't want to hear something. Human psychology I guess.

10
Atlas_Honked 10 points ago +10 / -0

There was a time on this site, I'd say about since inception til about a month before the election, where it was golden. I learned a great deal, and had some great conversations with other members.

Then, it took a dive. Started small, but then quality of content and overall conscious plummeted to a swamp of whatever the fuck this is now-a-days. It feels like hanging out with the literal retarded little brother of the original .win. My point is, given the time frame you and I encountered the same, I'm not surprised at all. I do miss those days though, plus we had one bad ass mofo in the White House!

5
MAGA1775 5 points ago +6 / -1

I noticed it really start to go downhill after the election too. Its like everyone collectively lost it and doubled down on the emotional and denial. The worst was the several months after the steal where this place turned into QAnon central and was nothing but seized servers, CIA/military gun battles, "trust the plan", etc. And anyone who questioned any of it was ganged up. At least that cooled off a bit.

I do miss the quality content and discussions and different viewpoints back then too.

4
Examiner1776 4 points ago +5 / -1

Q broke people's brains. Lin Wood broke people.

I still have friends that I'm trying to bring back from conspracy/hopium la-la land.

5
raginclayton 5 points ago +5 / -0

My friend legitimately thinks Trump is running the country from Mar a Lago, that Trump let Biden win to expose the deep state, and that Q will reveal himself when Biden is removed and Trump takes back the Presidency. This was supposed to happen at least 10 times this year lol.

2
Examiner1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mine too! My friend thinks that Biden is dead, it's all a big set, Trump is running the country and there's a huge battle between black hat and white hat hackers.

They were sure the internet was "deleted" at least once recently.

And now they've recently came out as flat earthers.

6
Handy499 6 points ago +6 / -0

This is a good point, and I admit that I fell into this crowd at times. I also think it speaks as too how deep the swamp is, and the challenges an outsider like Trump had to deal with.

Imagine being completely surrounded by frauds. Our government is full of fuckery

5
MAGA1775 5 points ago +5 / -0

I think a lot of good, moral people tend to be more trusting of others.

Trump had the same problem when going into the swamp.

There's lots of grifters and scumbags out there who will take advantage of people and movements. I just hope people can learn to start doing their own research and be more open to hearing other people out that might be warning them of something, even if its what they don't want to hear.

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
0
MAGA1775 0 points ago +2 / -2

Let me guess, you were one of the people I described in my post vehemently defending Lin Wood and shouting others down as "shills" who were trying to warn you about the guy?

1
Holyscmoly 1 point ago +2 / -1

Nope. No idea who you are and never posted about wood.

1
Belowzero 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s almost as if both sides have people. Are people on both sides? Because people are crazy everywhere.

12
KingOfTards 12 points ago +13 / -1

He had 40 years of donations to Democrats. Anyone who said he was on our side was a shill. But this place is infested just as bad today as back then

7
thunderstorm 7 points ago +8 / -1

I think Lin Wood's party affiliation is money.

6
KingOfTards 6 points ago +6 / -0

He is a Corrupt Democrat. But yeah money and lies.

7
Happyazz84 7 points ago +7 / -0

Word! After the election he would talk about legal cases they were perusing/asking for financial support that would just disappear into nothingness. Sack of shit

3
darkmodelogon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’ll pay you an upvote to compensate.

9
fat50 9 points ago +11 / -2

What did lin wood do?

50
tree_sloth4 50 points ago +52 / -2

He's a grifting faggot who raised money for "the cause" while he let Kyle rot in jail.

17
The_Litehaus_Abides 17 points ago +20 / -3

I want Lin Wood in jail for this. Sued, disbarred and jailed.

2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +8 / -6

The new Linn Wood is Barnes

6
The_Litehaus_Abides 6 points ago +7 / -1

Somebody downvoted you for that, but I'll tell you -- I have never liked nor trusted Barnes. I just don't like him.

It's like an instinctual feeling I got about him lacking genuine sincerity. Something's wrong there.

6
halcyondream 6 points ago +6 / -0

Look at his debate with Nick Fuentes. It was shocking how badly he did. This is supposed to be an expensive high powered lawyer and an early 20s college dropout political streamer completely outclassed him. Then he did damage control afterwards calling Fuentes a Nazi lol.

1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +4 / -3

The same shills that pumped Linn Wood haven't left this place. We went from Q anon and Linn Wood under Trump to Stormfags and Barnes under Biden. Same folks different campaign.

8
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 8 points ago +9 / -1

In the interview w Tucker, Kyle explained that he was represented at first by Lin Wood… and I’m not remembering the other lawyer’s name right now… John Pierce or something like that? I believe that guy is now, as of this week, representing the horned Jan 6 protester, by the way…. Anyway, so the Kenosha riot happened the end of August, and Kyle says that in Sept over a million dollars had been raised & he could’ve gotten out of jail—but he says his lawyers left him in jail to continue to raise money for themselves. Kyle ended up staying in jail for 80-something days.

4
SaltiTaralli 4 points ago +4 / -0

But wasn't the bail two million?

3
RandArrow 3 points ago +4 / -1

Typically you don't put down full amount. You put down something like 10%, maybe hand over deed to something, and a bail bond company does rest; with understanding bail bond company will hunt you down because you give them approval.

9
Porkbut 9 points ago +9 / -0

You have to put up the full amount in WI

4
SaltiTaralli 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm open to hearing all sides so I just read some info on Lin Woods Telegram. He said the full two million was put up. Ricky Schroeder gave the last 150k and Lin Wood had to personally guarantee a promissory note to Schroeder. I have no reason to disbelieve the particulars from Lin Wood because it seems easy to prove or disprove.

3
TravlingThr0ugh 3 points ago +3 / -0

Wisconsin requires the full amount and doesn’t allow bail bonds due predatory practices.

4
fat50 4 points ago +4 / -0

Thank you.

Interested in seeing lin wood's response to this - since he helped Sandman.

6
Harper42190 6 points ago +9 / -3

I think people are very confused here. I do think he's a grifter no doubt however people are blind to the David Hancock angle. Lin Wood raised the money and paid the bail and 500k in legal fees for Kyle. David Hancock is now using Kyle to bash Lin Wood. If you don't believe me, just look up the bullshit Hancock is tied up in and what happened between him and Lin.

Here is an interview he just did about it all.

https://t.me/linwoodspeakstruth/7450

6
fat50 6 points ago +7 / -1

You need to make this a post. It's only fair Lin Wood gets to tell his side of the story.

And nobody is "confused". Many of these people are shills trying to create division.

5
Harper42190 5 points ago +6 / -1

It won't get any attention, people are already taking Kyle's word as gospel, even though he's being played by Hancock. The Rittenhouse family is extremely poor and Hancock is basically telling them they need him to survive.

5
Harper42190 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://youtu.be/4R2wV6zqPDo

Here are some additional details about the $$

Hancock is a grifter and chases this shit.

3
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 3 points ago +3 / -0

When you say David Hancock is now using Kyle to bash Lin, are you saying that Hancock is now Kyle’s attorney? I’m not familiar with David Hancock.

Also—it is really confusing who paid for what. Last week there were a lot of posts about Mike Lindell having put up money for Kyle “when no one else would.” Does anyone know how that fits in?

6
Harper42190 6 points ago +6 / -0

David Hancock is an ex disgraced seal. He used to work security for wood and stole info from him and then got into a physical altercation. He has a lot of corruption around him and grifted the ppl of PR during the hurricane. I don't know how David Hancock got a strangle hold on the family but it seems like it is because they're a poor family and he has convinced them that they need him.

Mike Lindell put up 50k and Ricky Shroder put up 250k which Lin Wood cosigned that he'd get it back. The fightback foundation paid around 600k in legal fees for Kyle and put up the 2m bond as well. The bail money was never meant for Kyle and cannot be given to him legally because of how the foundation is setup and a lot of the money was promised back to the individual donors.

2
TravlingThr0ugh 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hancock is a pr guy not a lawyer. He allowed for Kyle to be filmed during the last year by Fox News: it’s risky could’ve been leaked and damage his case.

1
Examiner1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought that our famous pillow merchant got the 500k together

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

According to Robert Barnes 50k was from Lindell

2
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 2 points ago +2 / -0

If you want to watch that part of the interview, it starts at 34:55

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +3 / -1

We don't know how much Sandmann actually got. People usually quote the number he was asking for, and then in very small print you find "Settled out of court for an undisclosed amount." Of which Wood would have sucked up a major part, because that's what lawyers do.

2
Examiner1776 2 points ago +2 / -0

I've seen a lot of lawyers saying that there's no way he got more than a nuisance fee of between 50k-200k and that no one will ever know the actual number. I hope Kyle gets more.

0
Txiribiton 0 points ago +1 / -1

His organization paid the bail. Through psy-ops he is the bad guy.

4
JackLemon 4 points ago +8 / -4

Both Pierce and Lin Wood promoted the proven fraud and deep state psy-ops QAnon..That immediately proved they were grifters.

4
KrakenWakin4JoeBacon 4 points ago +4 / -0

In the months before & after the election, I had a take on Lin (of which I want to convince absolutely no one). There was no real conclusion anyway. It was more of a debate in my own head about whether Lin was, sort of, elevated by God—meaning, able to rise way above the judgement & fear in order to expose fraud & truth because of his apparent deep faith—or if he was just fucking crazy (unstable, a fanatic & delusional). And I want to clarify, if he is nuts, if he was crazy, it’s not his beliefs alone that would’ve made him so. It was his balls to the wall, reckless approach to it, combined with beliefs that became increasingly over-the-top, not just in content but in the way he was expressing them. At the time, I more or less dismissed the idea of him being a total con artist grifter. Now I’m thinking that’s a possibility. I’m also thinking I’m not nearly as intuitive as I once thought I was.

2
Illinois4Trump 2 points ago +2 / -0

So the kid who supports BLM and on Tucker Carlson show is not a grifter?

95
deleted 95 points ago +101 / -6
41
_-Th0r-_ 41 points ago +45 / -4

Vindication in the long run.

When he was leading the charge to boycott the GA runoff was when I went from rolling my eyes at people posting his tweets here to actively calling him out and trying to talk sense into ppl. Tens of thousands of Republicans stayed home, and it’s the reason why we’re held hostage to Biden’s handlers’ legislative agenda.

Fuck that guy. I know a lot here don’t like Tucker for not immediately coming down hard on one side amidst the Nov fraud issue, but he is going to war for Jan 6 detainees, and he has been all-out going against the BLM narrative in a way that the TV made you think wasn’t allowed.

Possible that his crusade encouraged or laid groundwork for Trump to ban CRT, which brought the issue out of the shadows and into family dinner table conversation.

22
deleted 22 points ago +29 / -7
16
War_Hamster 16 points ago +18 / -2

So Tucker knew what Lin Wood was and distanced himself from him?

To his credit, Tucker has outright questioned the legitimacy of the election since, and he is doing a lot of other good work.

I'm disappointed he didn't mention the Christmas Parade Massacre tonight, because that would have made it harder for the MSM to memory hole it. Maybe he's waiting for more info to come out and will report on it tomorrow.

11
MakeSpaceGreatAgain 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would assume Tucker didn't mention the terrorist attack because his whole show was pre planned around the Kyle interview. It will most likely be addressed tomorrow.

0
War_Hamster 0 points ago +1 / -1

Possibly. He still could have given it a 3 minute mention, but Hannity opened with it so you are likely right.

11
BoatingAccident 11 points ago +11 / -0

What has always pissed me off most about T_D are all the faggots who were cheering on Lin Wood when he was saying to not bother voting in the GA runoff.

Those faggots are still here. I see them often talking about how the ONLY solution is to go hot. They say not to vote and that "muh 1776 is the "only" way".

Kinda makes ya wonder about their intentions eh? Just like Mr. Wood's.

I just remember that every time I see some asshole talking about taking up arms. Simple minded people.

5
LongDongDonald420x69 5 points ago +5 / -0

People like you are the only reason I'm still here. This place has been a shit show lately...

3
_-Th0r-_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think Tucker had a deal to air the first interview with Kyle and was focused on that.

Add to it that the Christmas parade still has a lot of facts to come in, and no surprise to me. He likes to be accurate vs rush in.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yes, that is what I'm leaning towards as well.

3
N7fury 3 points ago +3 / -0

Went back and fixed me a drink and saw Hannity is covering it. Looks like Tucker dedicated his entire show to the Rittenhouse interview tonight

7
War_Hamster 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yup. But I can't take more than 5 minutes of Hannity these days. Monologue and then I'm gone.

4
N7fury 4 points ago +4 / -0

Haha, couldn't agree more with that

2
mainsoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't even stand the little blurbs at the end of the Tucker segments where Hannity does a 15 second commercial. I just hate that guy.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the world has passed him by.

2
TruthyBrat 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hell, I've been that way with Hannity for like 20 years, since his pre-syndicated radio days in Atlanta.

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I begrudgingly admit that Hannity did some good coverage during RussiaGate and the fake impeachments. Only problem was that he kept having Lindsay Graham on.

2
xBigCoffinHunter 2 points ago +2 / -0

“Rank and file good people guys. For real”

7
Here_we_go 7 points ago +8 / -1

The rinos were total pos that had speeches ready on jan 6th denouncing us.

5
Goozmania 5 points ago +5 / -0

You should have known he was a fraud from the first time he spoke... In Jesus name, amen. God told me this, Jesus died for that.

He invokes religion in literally every fucking sentence, like a televangelist.

6
BoatingAccident 6 points ago +6 / -0

Short story.

When I used to work at a rental car place, people sometimes would not return their cars on time. I knew I was going to have trouble getting the car when I would call them and listen to their answering machine say, at the end of the message: "HAVE A BLESSED DAY".

It was a GUARANTEE we were not going to get our car or get paid. We had a running joke going.

Since then I've found that whenever people profess their Christianity like that, it's because they have ulterior motives. Jesus didn't walk around bragging about stuff. He just took action.

1
UrbanCommando 1 point ago +1 / -0

“But now, he said, take your money and a traveler’s bag. And if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one!"

3
_-Th0r-_ 3 points ago +3 / -0

I mean I barely ever listened to anything he said bc I just saw someone going from zero to 1m twitter flllowers in a year trying to get attention. My focus was Trump.

But I’m allergic to grifters preying upon emotions of evangelicals.

3
Examiner1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

10000% agree! He was demanding that conservatives in GA stay home from the runoffs that we desperately needed to win.

When a 40 year liberal tells conservatives to stay home from the 2nd most important vote in the cycle then he's a liberal plant.

No fraud was "exposed" by us getting clowned in those GA runoffs. Lin is an idiot at best and democrat plant at worst.

16
LongDongDonald420x69 16 points ago +18 / -2

Yup. So many ignorant assholes spouting how LiN wOoD sPeAkS tRuTh LiStEn WhEn He TaLkS!!!1! fucking numpties

4
deleted 4 points ago +6 / -2
4
MAGA1775 4 points ago +5 / -1

LiN wOoD iS a LaWyEr hE wOuLd nEvEr LiE

LiN wOoD sPeAkS tHe tRutH, wHo ArE yoU?

So many tards on here who worshipped this grifter like a diety. Most of them will go on pretending like they never defended the guy and then fall for the next grifter that comes along that spouts off lies and false hopium.

You can't fix stupid.

3
Harper42190 3 points ago +3 / -0

I will say I think Kyle is being used as a pawn by David Hancock who has a vendetta against Wood. Richard Barnes vouched for woods regarding covering legal bills and getting Kyle bail. So just be cautious.

2
WiseOldOwl 2 points ago +2 / -0

People need heroes. I'm sad Wood turned out not to be one. I saw it coming, but I'm still sad about it.

2
UrbanCommando 2 points ago +2 / -0

User Name checks out with that comment!

0
Belowzero 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think it’s a hit job by Republicans who stand to lose midterms because all the people who follow Lin are never voting again. They’re watching him.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just noticed the Lin Wood worshippers came in here and spent time downvoted every single post talking negative about him

2
IncredibleMrE1 2 points ago +3 / -1

Qtards

2
JackLemon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well this site still has a forum for them.

10
Badfinz_FL 10 points ago +12 / -2

good to see you sir, here is an upvote

3
BoatingAccident 3 points ago +3 / -0

He fooled a lot of folks. Very slick.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

All the signs were there. And there were people, including myself, who were trying to warn people about Lin Wood while even providing facts/evidence to back up our concerns about him.

But unfortunately people didn't want to listen. We were shouted down as "shills" and "commies."

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Same, I provided all the evidence that Lin Wood was a grifter, including how batshit insane he is (such as the lawsuit his former partners filed against him, the fact he was a registered Democrat up until 2020, and all the other shady shit about him).

But like you, I was downvoted into oblivion and shouted down.

The Lin Wood worship on here was insane.

30
evenbiggerchubbys 30 points ago +30 / -0

I want to hear his excuse for letting Kyle rot. It’s not going to change what he did, but I want to hear it

10
pepperonishoes 10 points ago +10 / -0

OMG, no running water in his cell! No shower!

9
tree_sloth4 9 points ago +9 / -0

MrKrabsMoney.gif

He knew he could use the story of a 17 year old kid alone and defenseless in jail to grift patriots for money.

13
e_pluribus_unum9 13 points ago +15 / -2

I was surprised at this. Goes to show you never know

20
tree_sloth4 20 points ago +20 / -0

I had a bad feeling about him ever since he spoke at a Trump rally after the fraudulent election. He had a very Joel Osteen vibe to him.

8
MAGA1775 8 points ago +9 / -1

Plus the fact all his former law partners filed a lawsuit against him revealing all the batshit insane stuff he would do (call them all night, refer to himself as Jesus, how he would say he wants to fuck their wives, threaten their children, etc.), or the fact he was a Democrat up until 2020 and suddenly becomes some "outspoken patriot."

There were so many signs, but so many people refused to believe it.

Lin Wood did a ton of damage to the Stop The Steal legal fight with all his batshit insane, unvetted claims and lies that everyone ate up too.

7
N7fury 7 points ago +7 / -0

He had a very Joel Osteen vibe to him.

That's a good way to describe it

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
10
BloodElfSupporter 10 points ago +10 / -0

Sorry, didn't catch that part. What exactly did Lin Wood do to Kyle?

30
KeepMarxInTheGround 30 points ago +30 / -0

Raised enough money for his bail, but didn't bail him out, and instead used his incarceration for his political agenda. Garbage move.

7
MAGA1775 7 points ago +7 / -0

That is so scummy. Lin Wood was never for MAGA. He was a registered Democrat up until 2020.

He just decided to take advantage of the movement because his law career was circling the drain and wanted to use it to become a politician in GA.

27
N7fury 27 points ago +27 / -0

Wood and Pierce could have sent Kyle home much earlier but advised he stay in jail so they could raise more money. They raised millions for his legal defense but weren't actually doing any lawyering for lack of a better word

15
BloodElfSupporter 15 points ago +15 / -0

Wow, I'm speechless. I donated money to that original FreeKyle cause set up by Lin Wood and his team. When I saw Lin Wood didn't represent him I was confused but I didn't know the story behind it. What a garbage move!

5
stucklikegluetoMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

So what happened to all of the money they raised? Did any of it go to Kyle or his case?

3
Proud2BUSA 3 points ago +3 / -0

Kyle said they raised $1MM but the bail was $2MM. So how could he have gotten out sooner?

3
monkadelic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typically you bond out for 10% of the bail, so they only had to come up with 200k

3
Harper42190 3 points ago +4 / -1

Kyle is being mislead gravely by David Hancock who has a vendetta against Wood. This isn't me sticking up for wood cuz he's a massive faggot for the GA run off and all the conspiracies but we are not being told the full story here.

1
TravlingThr0ugh 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wood punched Hancock in the face.

1
Harper42190 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wonder what happened huh.

10
escapefromearth 10 points ago +10 / -0

kept him in jail

178
sum_ting_wong 178 points ago +182 / -4

This is the longest I have watched fox programming since the election. Pretty impressed with Kyle so far.

Obligatory: Fuck Fox!

15
ThatOneGuyQmart 15 points ago +15 / -0

Same here lol!

9
logan34 9 points ago +27 / -18

Does he say he supports BLm?

58
evenbiggerchubbys 58 points ago +65 / -7

He said he supports their right to peaceful protest.

15
deleted 15 points ago +42 / -27
44
Kennedy_Original45 44 points ago +52 / -8

Helps with his defamation lawsuit. Just saying… leave the kid alone he’s been through a lot. He just wants to move on.

18
ConfiscateTheCoats 18 points ago +19 / -1

I was thinking that’s possible too. He was very on-message regarding “defamation”, “defaming”, and he very quickly said the I support BLM line. Makes me think he’s just laying groundwork for his suits. A bit trashy if so, but better than him actually supporting them lmao

9
BearUP 9 points ago +9 / -0

to be fair. you can still think black lives matter, while also hating the organization.

just like you can support helping animals. while despising PETA.

7
Goozmania 7 points ago +12 / -5

Is that why he's doing interviews? To move on?

30
Kennedy_Original45 30 points ago +34 / -4

Okay fine. So he can make millions then move on. Some of you fucks are so picky about every fucking thing. If you had an army of people that followed all of your absolute convictions, you’d have an army of like ten.

8
Kamamala 8 points ago +11 / -3

Also, we're the ones that supported him this whole time. Just like the restaurants that now refuse to serve us.

3
Lion-Party-Rising 3 points ago +3 / -0

Some of you fucks are so picky about every fucking thing.

Preferring people not support a terrorist anti-white hate group is being picky now lmao. SMH

3
rubmewithbeer 3 points ago +3 / -0

That BLM line was cringe but we don't know what he's been through or have been told the last year. Seems like he has a "team" not looking out for his best interests.

3
oldhankdonald 3 points ago +3 / -0

Right. And for his own SAFETY, he needs to make a lot of money and be more in the spot light. You don’t go back to a $25k job in a crummy neighborhood and expect to not get harassed or killed.

0
KingOfTards 0 points ago +2 / -2

Less than that. 1 opinionated fuck who is also a mod has 1000 accounts. He is a shill faggot army of 1.

1
CA4Newscum 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why not do it that way. Broadcast your message so you don't have to repeat yourself to everyone you meet.

5
deleted 5 points ago +13 / -8
-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
0
Jeffersonian_Man 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've been here a long time and partially agree. Even if he's saying it just to help with defamation case, that's literally what we'd be upset with a grifter for. Fuck the optics, he should have said what we all think of blm. I don't hate Kyle now, I still support his right to defense. But it definitely lessens him.

3
Whitespace 3 points ago +3 / -0

I doubt it truly helps, but that's what he was advised to say.

And frankly, I went to a BLM protest (Not knowing it was BLM, I assumed it was an anti-police brutality protest). Obviously I saw within minutes that it was an astro-turf bunch of commies and left in disgust. I'm a grown ass man (physically anyway) and Rittenhouse more Saavy than I'll ever be.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
6
JS_Mill 6 points ago +7 / -1

With millions pending, he's playing the game perfectly. Anything he says now against it would be used by the media to say, "see, he is a racist!!"

2
deleted 2 points ago +5 / -3
3
knivey 3 points ago +4 / -1

he sees what the prosecutors pulled on him and has no problem imagining what they can do and get away with to POC

2
CA4Newscum 2 points ago +2 / -0

He puts it like this, paraphrasing: If I, Kyle, could get fucked over by a prosecutor in a very public case where I have access to resources, how much worse could it be for a person of color to get a fair trial. Prosecutorial misconduct is his experience, he thinks BLM shares that point in their message.

After the interview - Judge Jeanine also gives her own version of his words. Going through the rest of life being targeted vs. putting a message out that might appease that harassment, finding some common ground seems like a smart choice. He's young and thinks the rest of his life is going to be normal. It might take some time for him to find obscurity again. For all his good thoughts, give him at least the benefit of the doubt. He's done more than anyone here, probably.

2
mainsoda 2 points ago +2 / -0

My take was that Kyle seems very nonpolitical. Like almost every other 18 year old kid. BLM is something the masses have been deluded about for 2 years now. It's just about equal rights and all that, it's not surprising that a kid would be OK with the fake news message shot gunned into his brain 75 times a day for years. He's just a kid that means well and I don't hold it against him. I don't think he knows BLM is a straight up terror organization.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
2
Snoman 2 points ago +7 / -5

He said he supports BLM

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

Was he with the proud boys a while back though?

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

Stop lying.

1
evenbiggerchubbys 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said he supports BLM. In fact, he uses it to prove how not-racist he is, implying not supporting BLM is racist.

1
evenbiggerchubbys 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did I lie? I said he supported there right to peaceful protest ? Did he say how he supported their doctrines?

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

"I am not racist. I support BLM".

That is what he said. Sure, he said he doesn't support the rioting, but he supports BLM, not their right to protest.

31
Shrillary 31 points ago +32 / -1

He specifically talks about prosecutorial misconduct and how it was used against him and many other people that are easy targets (usually black or Hispanic teenagers, but can be anyone the prosecutor doesn't like)

7
NZ_Pede 7 points ago +8 / -1

Exactly. There are levels to BLM that most here know but choose to forget or not even acknowledge. While I'm in the zone of fuck BLM and all the bullshit they do to divide everyone, I also understand their fight against the system. BLM thinks the system is out there to only target black people when in fact the system is out there targeting everyone. Also if BLM actually cared about black lives then they would make a fucking change in their community which could lead to less time being in the system. In my opinion BLM can fuck off. They need to stop making it about race and stop looking for a fucking handout. Clean your shit up. If only their hate was pointed at the fucking government instead of this stupid race baiting bullshit

1
BearUP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ya pretty much summed up my issues with the organization.

1
NC_patriot 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes. They keep looking at other people to save them instead of working to save themselves.

1
Richard_Dangler 1 point ago +1 / -0

This shit right here.

7
sum_ting_wong 7 points ago +10 / -3

That was a snippet of his statement, and parsed like that to get a soundbite that would get people riled up. He goes on to say he supports everyone's right to protest, but doesn't necessarily agree with some groups methods.

-13
deleted -13 points ago +8 / -21
7
MAGA_APN 7 points ago +10 / -3

LISTEN to what he says " I do not agree that people have the right to burn down, I do not appreciate that people are burning down American cities to spread their message"

HE is 18 fucking years old give the kid a break. And give all of those who are blown away by his poise a break too. Stop shitting on your own front porch.

2
BearUP 2 points ago +3 / -1

the guy is bot account. likely just here to try to make us hate Kyle.

-5
deleted -5 points ago +7 / -12
3
MAGA_APN 3 points ago +5 / -2

No the real question is why you have to take this kid down? No one is making him out to be a god. But you seem a little bit too invested in taking down a kid who has already been through more than probably most grown adults. Maybe try therapy.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +6 / -7
4
TeachMeHowToWin 4 points ago +5 / -1

Or he wants to sue the state for prosecutorial misconduct, and throwing out a soundbite about how the state has a "history" of abusing people that the left can't easily ignore, makes it far easier for him. Make them live up to their own claims and their own standards.

If St Floyd of Fentanyl can get money from the state, so can Kyle. And he should. Bankrupt the country before Biden does it for us.

-4
Goozmania -4 points ago +5 / -9

Everything in your statement is fact. I think people on this forum are not watching or listening to the interview.

4
KingOfTards 4 points ago +6 / -2

This faggot created a new account, makes a comment then logs into another account and replies

Everything in your statement is fact.

0
DeplorableCentipede 0 points ago +1 / -1

Says massive faggot u/KingOfTards

6
_-Th0r-_ 6 points ago +10 / -4

How much of that statement is Kyle really supporting them vs trolling ppl who call him a wBiTe SuPrEmAcIs

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

It won't be good enough for the Silence is Violence sect.

3
Goozmania 3 points ago +5 / -2

He's not trolling; he probably doesn't even know how to troll. He thinks BLM is virtuous. He said "If they did this to me, imagine what they could do to a person of color"

0
Geeee 0 points ago +1 / -1

lol owned by sucking up to you

bet you feel so owned

Commies are laughing their ass off at Kyle doing this. They are loving it

-1
PhuckAirTang -1 points ago +2 / -3

Exactly

0
BarneyFrank 0 points ago +2 / -2

Most normies probably would, but I doubt Kyle still will support them privately after coming face to face with their ilk. May have been told to say that by a publicist.

2
Richard_Dangler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Love Tucker but fuck fox.

2
Ryanaissance 2 points ago +2 / -0

Watching Fox is Stockholm Syndrome.

2
Jimmy33 2 points ago +2 / -0

SAme here. Very impressive young man, wise as grandpa rocking on the porch.

143
based_trekkie 143 points ago +147 / -4

"Everyone has the right to protest and assemble"

"I do not agree that people have the right to burn down, I do not appreciate that people are burning down American cities to spread their message"

96
ckover9000 96 points ago +101 / -5

Yeah, his statement of supporting BLM was obviously under this context. It was amusing watching plenty a panty get twisted over it for the last 24 hours.

18
based_trekkie 18 points ago +27 / -9

I support BLM..... you know actually protesting like non-violent human beings, sadly they won't.

25
War_Hamster 25 points ago +25 / -0

Plus the fact that they are actual marxists.....

6
Orange_Juice 6 points ago +6 / -0

And want to destroy the nuclear family

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yes, that's part of the Marxist plot.

21
thunderstorm 21 points ago +22 / -1

I am more red pilled than most. I don't support them being able to exist at all, let alone protest.

-5
ckover9000 -5 points ago +7 / -12

You don't realize there have been plenty of peaceful protests held by BLM supporters. Most all of these riots were preceded by actual peaceful protests during the day, then at night the freaks come out. The lying media (which none of us watch) do 60 seconds on the actual peaceful protests and then gaslight people that what happened overnight was the same thing, hence the "mostly peaceful protests" narrative. Then FOX doesn't show them at all and barely anyone on the right realizes they happened. We had BLM march through a shopping center area here and it was great, peaceful with music and it was like a fun parade...then the fuckfaces come out at the end and start fucking everything up when the sun starts to dip. There are two completely different groups and unfortunately they get obfuscated with each other.

11
JesusisKing 11 points ago +11 / -0

if you think the enabler and the addict are not of the same coin you shouldn't be posting here

8
based_trekkie 8 points ago +8 / -0

The Media ACTIVELY Obfuscates them!

The media is fucking GUILTY of AIDING AND ABIDING!

7
Visolatte 7 points ago +7 / -0

This is wrong. They act for cameras during the day, knowing their time is coming at night. They are the exact same people.

5
SteelDriver 5 points ago +5 / -0

The problem with the "mostly peaceful protest" angle is that it would not be reciprocated for any right wing cause (or, really, any cause other than something for the far left). Yeah, most BLM protestors are peaceful. ...just like most of the protestors in Charlottesville (on both sides). Do you see the difference in how they were reported? It's kind of a misrepresentation on the level of "...other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?"

Also, the idea of "black lives matter" (the movement) is based mostly on feelings not backed up by the statistics of reality. The "BLM" organization is almost entirely a front for communist revolution. Either way, the protests and the riots (which were mostly asshole opportunists and Antifa) are based on bullshit.

I don't have a problem with Rittenhouse' statement. He was in Kenosha to help people (and maybe even to be near "the action" - which is fine; that's almost entirely why most protestors and rioters are there). He made the point that protesting needs to be done peacefully. Some of this could be an attempt to defuse the vitriol coming at him. Hell, he may just agree with them (I kind of doubt his support goes more than skin deep, but I don't know him). Either way, he's allowed his opinion and it still doesn't change my outrage that he was charged in such a clear cut case of self defense.

3
Husky 3 points ago +3 / -0

The fuckfaces are the same people that went through peacefully.

10
Goozmania 10 points ago +12 / -2

Did you even watch the interview? He defends BLM, he talks about those poor people of color who don't have the privilege he has.

14
Defund_Soros 14 points ago +15 / -1

I never thought I’d see the day people here would be bending over backwards to defend someone supporting BLM terrorists. Fucking pathetic. Let Kyle find out the hard way how these poor people he feels so sorry for feel about him and his mother. They want him dead, fuck all them their lives DO NOT matter.

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

You'd think he'd have learned something with what he just went through. Apparently he's retarded

2
ckover9000 2 points ago +6 / -4

Yeah you're right, he just sat there sucking BLM's dick the whole hour

9
FreddyThePatriot 9 points ago +11 / -2

Note what he went on to say...

He said something with the meaning along the lines of "if prosecutors can do this to me, imagine what they could do to a person of color!"

He's repeating more BLM shit, and like a little robot uses phrases like "person of color."

1
ckover9000 1 point ago +3 / -2

You think it doesn't happen. Kenosha Co. and Racine Co. are known for railroading not just minorities but anyone just for the win. That's just two little jerkwater areas in Wisconsin.

0
darkmodelogon 0 points ago +4 / -4

Everyone is entitled to their opinion and I think a lot of people have this ideal of how he should be and think but people often go their own way. He’s likely not the full blown TDW type many here wish him to be, but he is a guy who is trying to help the country be a better place and has done more to advance that than 99.999% of people here. Before, during, and after the events of that night. He also likely hasn’t spent the time we have learning every facet of BLM’s evil. He is far more normie than most here, give him time. He’s 18 and had a life. Hopefully he can have a life again

9
ApexVeritas 9 points ago +10 / -1

Yours is the exact type of mentality that has allowed our civilization to get as bad as it is. Tolerance, compromise, and acceptance of lies and evil is self destructive. If someone says something that's wrong, call them out on it. You don't have to be abusive about it, but remaining silent is a big contributor to how we got to where we are, from the personal level to society wide. Sure, people are allowed to have their own opinions, but they're not allowed to defy truth without consequence, especially when they're pushing their lies on others. That is the entire basis of being "red pilled", to be able to accept hard truths over comfortable lies. The oddity is that most people think this as a hateful act, to repudiate someone's bad opinion. If you actually care about someone you'd tell them the truth, and not let them falter.

1
darkmodelogon 1 point ago +1 / -0

It bothered me to hear it too. Maybe I didn’t make that clear. But I can also look at the big picture and him as a whole. He’s likely coached to say that. He has a unique situation and can’t come off as hard core right winger or the media who still controls opinion in this country will try to crucify him. He’s been through as lot. I think he means he believes in right to protest and he does call out there’s a lot of prosecutorial misconduct which impacts blacks and whites. That misconduct can vary. Now it’s pendulum has swung to basically ignoring blatant black crime and crucifying whitey.

I hate blm and wish he didn’t say that as I knew it would draw ire here.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

We are not machines. We're men. We don't have to fully accept and forgive someone just because they're on our side. We're capable of remaining brothers to one another without agreeing on everything. However, that doesn't mean we must accept falsehood in one another. It's our duty to one another to correct mistakes each other makes, so we can raise each other up in each of our tasks in self betterment. This also doesn't mean debate isn't welcomed.

0
SteelDriver 0 points ago +2 / -2

...and your mentality appears to be making the perfect the enemy of the good.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wrong. Acceptance of everything someone is and does, just because they're on our side is leftist thinking, its machine thinking. We're not machines. We're men. We're not only capable of calling out mistakes within our ranks, it's required. As I've mentioned elsewhere, we're brothers here. We share common goal, to fight this evil that's pervaded and destroying our lives and everything we love. At it's most basic, good is truth, and all that it entails, and evil is lies, antithetical to truth and everything that it means.

If you call yourself good it means you've planted your flag next to truth, with the goal to seek it, understand it, and defend it. This must be done in ourselves, in our family, our neighbors, our people, and our brothers. Again, calling out mistakes in others isn't a hateful act. It can appear so through poor execution, which demotivates people, crushing them into the mud. It should be done with love, which most people no longer see, because of the evil and strife that's taken over. If you truly love someone, you can accept their faults, but try to teach them their error, so they can improve. In this way, we can raise each other up, to better ourselves, for our own betterment and for each other. At it's most basic that's what brotherhood means.

Acceptance of lies, in any form, is a path of evil and destruction. Do not go that way.

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +2 / -1

He's not wrong. Come up with some more valuable input which he clearly put the effort into doing

-3
KingOfTards -3 points ago +1 / -4

So? You want him to lie about corrupt DAs? They don't care what color you are in many cases. They plant evidence and work with forensics to get outcomes. You want him to use N word and speak Stormfag?

9
deleted 9 points ago +16 / -7
0
ckover9000 0 points ago +4 / -4

I don't care if he's a god or not, he just sat up there and said he respects everyone's rights no matter the color of their skin.

2
deleted 2 points ago +10 / -8
1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yes it is, any defense or blm after all they've done deserves a swift kick to the teeth

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well he should stop respecting the rights of BLMers trying to overthrow our country. And you should stop being such a cuck

0
KingOfTards 0 points ago +4 / -4

Why all the handshakes?

-9
deleted -9 points ago +4 / -13
2
KingOfTards 2 points ago +6 / -4

Oh another TD veteran turned raging stormfag with TDS? Hmmm

-7
deleted -7 points ago +4 / -11
5
Aletheia 5 points ago +7 / -2

Anacucknda

1
Geeee 1 point ago +2 / -1

He said that they'd have done worse to him if he was a person of color. Stop huffing the copium.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +2 / -1

He said peacefully and was there putting out fires.

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +1 / -0

He shouldn't have been there to help them in the first place. Fuck turn. Let them hurt themselves

138
hereticpatriot 138 points ago +141 / -3

Interesting that Kyle just used the “malice” in describing Biden defaming him. He’s been speaking to an attorney. Joe’s going to have to pay up.

38
War_Hamster 38 points ago +39 / -1

Kyle phrased every bit of that part of the interview very precisely. He's been coached pretty well.

10
wethepepe 10 points ago +10 / -0

even down to the “I support BLM” (ew) too in my opinion

Smart.

Take them to the cleaners Kyle!

6
refresco 6 points ago +6 / -0

It's such a good troll. The left will hate it and they can't do anything but the same bitching they've done and it strengthens his upcoming court cases.

4
wethepepe 4 points ago +4 / -0

He just needs to make sure he doesn’t give them ammunition to claim their lies were justified (ie. not getting on the soap box about BLM) and he will own them all

34
thekindlyman555 34 points ago +35 / -1

I wouldn't count on it, but hopeful to be wrong. But yeah the use of the phrase "actual malice" is a legal term that is a requirement for defamation of a public figure.

5
hey_spike 5 points ago +6 / -1

Biden may have a legal way out of a defamation lawsuit, but the public won't be so keen to let Biden off the hook.

2
C_Macks 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Malice" is a word, just because someone is well spoken or has a larger vocabulary doesn't mean they've been speaking to lawyers.

For fucks sake, normalize being decently educated.

1
RedditIs4Retards 1 point ago +2 / -1

You're dumb enough to think he hasn't been spreaking to lawyers?

He kinda attained nick sandmans lawyer for one lmao

119
lurkwellmyfriends 119 points ago +127 / -8

Kid's got more balls than most men and has been through hell. I hate that some are turning on him for innocuous comments about blm and people taking advantage of him.

Thank God for self-defense.

6
KingOfTards 6 points ago +13 / -7

WOKE stormfags are lefties with TDS. You cannot expect them to side with anybody. They adopt lefty tactics and claim the left always wins because they are so strong (while totally ignoring globalist support, blue city control and media on their side).

3
JoggingLooter 3 points ago +3 / -0

But they will say Kamala built her career on putting minorities in prison and ignore poor people that in her district are minorities get railroaded by shitheads like kamala.

2
Richard_Dangler 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep. Stormfags, trolls, agitators, glowies, 50 cent army, leftists in sheep's clothing, all of them have been coming here for the past few weeks.

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're literally simping for BLM now and you call anyone lefty

0
KingOfTards 0 points ago +1 / -1

You are proving to be just like a WOKE radical. You view everything through the Marxist lems. I'm calling out the underlying ideology of Marxism which is the Foundation of BLM. Your dumbass is blinded by the emotional race aspect because you have fallen for their game.

0
Geeee 0 points ago +1 / -1

ROFL

BY NOT SUPPORTING BLM SUPPORTERS YOU'RE A MARXIST JUST LIKE BLM

WEW LAD

1
KingOfTards 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ah yes the all caps response to your blame others for your own faults tactic.

2
Richard_Dangler 2 points ago +3 / -1

Kid's got more balls than most men and has been through hell

Agreed. My ass has been to Iraq (not using that as a bade of honor) but I was never in a situation like he was. Fucking retards hating on him are basement dwellers.

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

innocuous comments about BLM

Holy shit Kyle turned patriots dot win into a lefty site

-5
deleted -5 points ago +12 / -17
5
BingoCard 5 points ago +13 / -8

Let the kid believe in what he chooses to believe in, right or wrong, stop trying to turn him into a Greta like how her shitty parents did, and be glad the justice system didn't fail the kid for defending himself.

10
ApexVeritas 10 points ago +11 / -1

Wrong.

Stop tolerating lies, falsehoods, and evil, regardless of who is espousing it. It's a big contributor to what's gotten society to this point.

2
RedditIs4Retards 2 points ago +2 / -0

Knew we had a bunch of cucks in here for a long time. These people are embarrassing

2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just as I won't tolerate a lie, falsehood, or mistake in Kyle, I won't tolerate it from the men here. We're better than this, and I will do my best to always call it out, with the intent to improve each other, to raise each other up, not to crush them into the mud. We share common goal, we're brothers. We must act like it, all that it entails.

1
TrannyClausSliceDice 1 point ago +3 / -2

That’s fine. He’s absolutely allowed to believe how he chooses but why are ppl getting downvoted for saying they think it’s absurd that he “supports blm” and that the justice systems targets POC and that he had white pRiVlAgE?

He said all that stuff… which is cucky.

Do i still support him? Absolutely.

-2
deleted -2 points ago +9 / -11
2
BingoCard 2 points ago +6 / -4

Clearly you're the one who wants to kiss his ass trying to force him to think how you do, he just started dipping his toes into politics he won't have the same values as you as he is just 18, maybe he'll have different views later in his life or maybe not.

Stop looking up to kids for politics.

2
SomeBloodyMinger 2 points ago +3 / -1

They're a new account with a provocative username, and these are their posts as with a post history of downvotes and a lot of starting trouble for no reason. Hmm...

-2
deleted -2 points ago +4 / -6
0
deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1
-2
deleted -2 points ago +3 / -5
2
RedditIs4Retards 2 points ago +2 / -0

Don't worry I agree, until this point, everyone of these guys was absolutely shitting on anyone who even slightly supported BLM. Until this dumbass kid came along. Imagine going through what he did and still supporting blm. When each and every one of them hates his guts and wants him dead. What a dumbass

110
KeepMarxInTheGround 110 points ago +110 / -0

Lin Wood just got called out.

42
I_am_the_glowie 42 points ago +42 / -0

Yeah he did. Holy shit.

4
Snake 4 points ago +4 / -0

I honestly don’t know why Lin Wood’s name is attached to this. Can somebody explain? I thought he was a defamation lawyer and John Pierce was his criminal lawyer?

10
Beccabee88 10 points ago +10 / -0

My understanding is that Lin wood runs the group that technically posted kyles bond.

3
Snake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Isn’t that a good thing?

7
DeplorableCentipede 7 points ago +7 / -0

Now that Kyle has been found not guilty, there's a dispute over where that $2 million in bond money should go.

3
Snake 3 points ago +3 / -0

Shouldn’t it go back to who paid for it, which is fightback?

5
ActionExpress 5 points ago +5 / -0

Watch the interview. Kyle said they had the money early Sept for bail, could have signed paperwork and got out mid sept. Lin and JP wanted to keep him in jail until oct 20th. Right when Kyle gets out, JP says he is in a militia group. Which Kyle is saying is 100% false.

3
Snake 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did and it doesn’t make sense and your answer doesn’t make sense. What you’re saying is a criminal lawyer decision. Lin Wood is a defamation lawyer who only spoke with Kyle once.

3
I_am_the_glowie 3 points ago +3 / -0

lin created a financial campaign to help kyle and originally was on his defense team.

2
Snake 2 points ago +2 / -0

That all sounds like a good thing though. I don’t get what Lin did that was wrong.

3
FutureFreemason 3 points ago +3 / -0

kyle's saying he was in jail for longer because of Lin Wood and that he was doing it for self-profit

3
Snake 3 points ago +3 / -0

But what does a defamation lawyer have to do with that decision? Wasn’t John Pierce his criminal lawyer?

2
DeplorableCentipede 2 points ago +2 / -0

As stated, Lin Wood runs the group that raised the funds, so he had the power to decide when to post bail.

2
FutureFreemason 2 points ago +2 / -0

man just watch the interview

2
Snake 2 points ago +2 / -0

How is that a defamation lawyers decision? John Pierce was his criminal lawyer.

2
I_am_the_glowie 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lin started the fightback campaign where they raised money on Kyle's behalf. People donated generously. Lin then held the money and didn't immediately use it to bail out Kyle. Kyle fired Lin and his other lawyer. Since trail is now completed, bail money should go back to Kyle. However Lin wood thinks it should go back to him and not Kyle. So now there is a fight over who should get the money.

1
Snake 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why should Lin Wood have to pay an additional $150 thousand fucking dollars for the "luxury" of getting Kyle the fuck out of jail? You realize that Lin Wood literally had to legally guarantee some of the donors that they'd get the money back, right? You realize money doesn't just fucking grow on trees, right? Lin can't just waive his hands and print another $150k.

Nobody else helped Kyle. Fox News is trying to sow discord and it's working.

If this is the way Lin is gonna get treated he should have let Kyle rot in prison.

2
jubyeonin 2 points ago +2 / -0

That stupid "fightback" hashtag was also an organization to grift money and smoothbrains gave money to him because he said some of it would go to the LARPer.

6
MAGA1775 6 points ago +6 / -0

Good. Lin Wood is one of the biggest scumbags around.

1
Richard_Dangler 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lin Wood is a tard but I still laugh at all his comments about Hunter's teeth.

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd rather side with Lin Wood over a BLM fag

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
98
PorchLightOn 98 points ago +100 / -2

Starting to think Kyle's going to be okay, because he seems pretty aware of how people around him were trying to manipulate his circumstances for their own benefits, at his expense, from early on. He's going to need that ability, for sure. It's good he's been able to sort things out so clearly.

I'm really impressed so far. Very well spoken, for only being 18.

14
Magabirdlady2 14 points ago +14 / -0

same yes...

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +8 / -3

Well the choice of Richards shows he still has some discernment issues, but the guy did get the job done.

11
KingOfTards 11 points ago +11 / -0

He won and Barnes got fired. Kinda hard to argue that outcome.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Credit where it's due, but after seeing his interview on CNN, I think he may have gotten lucky.

Of course, it helps that it should have been a slam dunk case.

9
KingOfTards 9 points ago +9 / -0

If it were such a slam dunk, why was Barnes concern trolling 3 days before it started? He was literally comparing a slam dunk self defense case to being like the OJ murder trial.

5
War_Hamster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because Barnes knows anything can happen in a trial. There are no guarantees with a jury, which was Barnes' biggest criticism (jury selection).

The truth is the case should never have been brought. It was very weak and was only done so for political reasons. Did Richards avoiding the politics help or hurt?

3
KingOfTards 3 points ago +3 / -0

I agree the case shouldn't have made it to court but I don't see why Barnes would compare it to the OJ case. Then he claimed Richard's was compromised because of his jury selection method. The only reason would to mentally rock Kyle and team leading up to the trial.

I think it's best to not play politics in a trial. Especially in a blue area with a questionable jury. You?

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm not sure how you can keep politics out of a prosecution that is 100% political, but I'd rather politics were kept out of everything.

Again, Richards got the result, so I give him props.

Barnes is an interesting case for me. I don't always agree with his version of the world, but he's been right on several of the issues I disagreed with him on, so I have to give him some credit. Not sure I trust him all the way. He knows the system too well and has never sounded the alarm.

1
Aiur1776 1 point ago +1 / -0

QQQ

5
PorchLightOn 5 points ago +5 / -0

I'm not sure, but I think Barnes implied that David Hancock, the "spokesperson" guy, chose Kyle's attorneys. I admit I'm still a little worried about Hancock; I don't know what to make of him, and Barnes is openly negative about Hancock's motivations.

But Kyle may have the tools he needs to navigate some of these tricky waters. I feel better since watching this interview. (Can't believe how much I've worried about this kid I never met!)

4
SomeGuyOnTheInternet 4 points ago +4 / -0

Starting to think Kyle's going to be okay

"God's been behind (him) since the beginning."

3
JesusisKing 3 points ago +3 / -0

GOd is with him and this was all of the correct timeline IMO

1
Moonlight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, the jailers may have been nice to him because they wanted information from him. I would assume to not trust them.

80
deleted 80 points ago +82 / -2
74
based_trekkie 74 points ago +76 / -2

Faggot Lin Wood is to BLAME for that SHIT!

-33
MAGAMOPAR -33 points ago +4 / -37

87 days. Haha.

Thats not shit.

34
TheBigT03 34 points ago +35 / -1

Too much for an innocent kid

2
The_Expert 2 points ago +2 / -0

facts!

1
MAGAMOPAR 1 point ago +2 / -1

I agree. Its not a solid talking point though. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people have sat for far longer, if not died in prison because of malicious prosecution and/or wrongful convictions.

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
12
Ryan_ 12 points ago +12 / -0

Alright there, Mr. Badass.

7
TheSphinxIsAFag 7 points ago +8 / -1

Spoken like a true criminal.

-1
MAGAMOPAR -1 points ago +4 / -5

Inaccurate. True criminals are democrats. I'm an America First Republican.

I just know 87 days is not really that long to be sitting somewhere with a TV, tablet, phone etc and he's about to be loaded. Not a solid talking point for Kyle. People have sat years and perhaps died innocent.

I'm glad the court system worked in his case. Now he's gonna get paid!

1
Richard_Dangler 1 point ago +2 / -1

oh go fuck yourself buddy

1
MAGAMOPAR 1 point ago +1 / -0

Tell that to the people sitting in the DC gulags.

4
ApexVeritas 4 points ago +5 / -1

I've never understood this type of comment. "I've suffered worse therefore everything you say is moot". You're suggesting that because you or other people have been in jail for longer, that therefore it's not wrong that Kyle spent any amount of time in jail, and he shouldn't complain about it, and we shouldn't complain about it. It's illogical. All it would take to depose you from your victimhood throne is someone that's "suffered" more than you.

1
MAGAMOPAR 1 point ago +2 / -1

Its wrong that Lin Wood is a grifter and could have posted his bond 50 days sooner.

2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree with that. Those who use us for monetary gain should be expelled from our movement and labelled appropriately.

1
MAGAMOPAR 1 point ago +1 / -0

My comment wasn't directed towards "I've done more time then him so 87 days is irrelevant" if it was I would have offered a figure that exceeds Kyle's.

87 days is nothing compared to life he was actually facing. We all know he did nothing wrong and shouldn't have been charged to begin with but he was.

The people sitting in DC did absolutely nothing and have been sitting for 9ish months...

I dont see it as a strong talking point for Kyle. Thats all.

Glad he is out with his family and getting ready to line up lawsuits.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure. One is preferable to the other. However, he shouldn't have seen a single second of jail. It was clearly self defense on his part, and the justice system was used against him by politically motivated government and prosecution.

2
MAGAMOPAR 2 points ago +2 / -0

I completely agree. But we can't change what happened. Its done. To hear that his "lawyers" said he was safer locked up is just unacceptable, fuck them.

3
JesusisKing 3 points ago +3 / -0

mopar at it again lmao

0
MAGAMOPAR 0 points ago +1 / -1

You guys take people far too seriously.

He was almost gone for life...87 days is nothing in comparison.

2
JesusisKing 2 points ago +2 / -0

i agree with you, wild one!

76
PennsylPede1776 76 points ago +81 / -5

I can't imagine the calm of mind this kid had. He's 17 years old, has a gun pointed at his head, and somehow identifies a malfunction with his weapon without trying to fire it, fixes it, and gets a round on target before Bye-cep can fire. Absolutely amazing.

30
tree_sloth4 30 points ago +30 / -0

Me in that situation:

So anyway, I started blastin'

16
RackOps 16 points ago +17 / -1

Per his testimony, the rifle never jammed.

37
PennsylPede1776 37 points ago +38 / -1

His bolt didn't close all the way after shooting Huber. He had to hit the forward assist to close it.

11
RackOps 11 points ago +11 / -0

Roger that, I stand corrected.

3
PennsylPede1776 3 points ago +3 / -0

No worries. With all that's gone on in the case, there's bound to be some confusion over the little details like that. From what I was able to watch of the trial, I didn't think he had a malfunction either until watching the interview tonight.

2
RonPaulWasRight 2 points ago +2 / -0

The situational awareness of this kid is amazing. People can go thousands of rounds without needing to use forward assist, yet he pulls it off in a fraction of a second, spots a gun pointed at his head and rips off another shot on target. Just fucking amazing.

1
ApesInControl 1 point ago +1 / -0

and they say the forward assist is useless

1
JKillen 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m glad we got closure on that

No pun intented

Seriously I think God had his hand on him through this whole thing but I was so curious what happened with that “jam” if it became this myth getting blown out of proportion because I keep watching the video and have no idea how he accomplished that inside that window of time😬 That kid acted flawlessly, and didn’t take out anyone who wasn’t acting in violence

hearts in jail

It’s SPADES ♠️ you fucking high brow twit! (When you’re in recovery you’ve got too many friends who’ve been to jail 🙁popular party game)

11
Cyer6 11 points ago +11 / -0

Yep. Just a failure to fully seat into the chamber but to think of using the forward assist in the heat of the moment showed amazing control. He had to have some solid training on that firearm because that's the STOP technique for clearing those AR's... Slap, Tap, Observe, Pull.

2
RackOps 2 points ago +2 / -0

We were taught "tap, rack, bang" but yeah...point taken.

1
Cyer6 1 point ago +1 / -0

For the thousands of rounds I've shot through them, I've only had to use the forward assist on a very dry, poorly maintained gun. Most malfunctions I've had were a failure of the bolt carrier to load a round off the magazine which was quickly remedied by a quick rack.

2
MAGA_APN 2 points ago +2 / -0

as someone unfamiliar with guns can you explain in layman's terms?

1
lolpaladins 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea, so with new guns that are never fired (or poorly maintained guns), the bolt that goes back and forth in the receiver has a lot of friction, metal against metal. This causes failures because it does not slide smoothly (like not using using lube during sex). If there is too much friction the force of the spring (the thing the stock is attached to on an ar15) is not enough to slam the bolt/round all the way forward.

Same thing happens with older guns where the spring has worn out and doesn't have enough force to strip a round out of the magazine and load it into the chamber.

Either way, they are caused by the same problem, not enough forward pressure from the back part of the gun. Stronger spring, heavier weight, those can both help.

Sorry, this is already too long of a response, but basically the way an AR15 works is the bullet goes bang... that sends the bolt to the back of the gun... a spring sends the bolt back to the front which also loads a new round into the gun. If there is not enough back pressure or not enough forward pressure, the gun will not cycle correctly. If there is enough back pressure but not enough forward pressure, it won't load a new round because it doesn't have enough force. I there is too much forward pressure and not enough back pressure (incorrectly put together gun or clogged gas tube) it might jam because it wont eject the old round completely. Finally, too much pressure in both directions generally makes the weapon function, but wears out parts quicker and makes it unpleasant to shoot... ie: it kicks harder)

edit: many of the failures of the AR15 are caused by people receiving poor training during their military service and they think the weapon is supposed to be fired dry... again, dry is bad, metal rubbing against metal is bad, think of it like a car engine running without oil.

edit2: moving pictures are worth a thousand words

https://youtu.be/vn6AMp6GWug?t=38

6
Higgins77 6 points ago +8 / -2

He said the ejection port didn't close all the way so he had to slam it forward to close it.

5
KMacsBinder 5 points ago +5 / -0

He just said that he had to tap the forward assist to fully seat the next round. His testimony is still correct that he never pulled the charging handle.

3
Taylor814ce 3 points ago +4 / -1

It likely would have "jammed" if he hadn't used the forward assist to push the round into battery.

1
Sevralann 1 point ago +1 / -0

Bye-cep is a classic case of carrying the gun but not having the nuts to pull the trigger…he would have his gun taken away and be beaten to death with it…

71
TickleTh1sElmo 71 points ago +77 / -6

He's only a kid. He supports BLM because he doesn't see what they're really about yet.

99
hereticpatriot 99 points ago +102 / -3

It would be pretty dumb for Kyle to say BLM is bad while he’s about to sue all the defamers calling him a white supremacist. Just saying.

44
FromNC 44 points ago +47 / -3

This, I’d hold my nose and call an apple a pear for 5 minutes if it knocked my enemies down and made me generational wealth.

And before someone says it, I wouldn’t consider it selling out because I’m not advancing the enemies rhetoric in any positive way.

26
hereticpatriot 26 points ago +26 / -0

And the added bonus is that it rubs salt in the wound, blm is even more pissed:

3
ApexVeritas 3 points ago +4 / -1

Are y'all really suggesting that "we should support BLM, to own the libs!"?

I understand why we're supporting Kyle, but this is a stupid take.

0
ApexVeritas 0 points ago +2 / -2

If you compromise truth for money you deserve neither.

1
FromNC 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yea, no - GTFO with your morals, that shit doesn’t win when you’re fighting guerilla wars. This dudes going to need all the money possible from these lawsuits just for life long security.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

"GTFO with your morals"

You could not have said a more self destructive philosophy to an individual, to nations, to our movement than you did. Our side prioritizes truth above all else. Truth is all encompassing to everything in this universe, and everything it means. Logic, what can be deduced and derived from it, including morals, ethics, virtues, what works, what doesn't, and why. If you abandon truth, or any aspect of it, you and everything you build is damned.

You also appear to be attributing something to me that's not true. I'm not advocating for this modern weak incarnation of passive smug moral superiority that others within our movement do, that seeks to perpetually turn the other cheek. Logic will tell you violence is sometimes necessary and righteous. Logic will also tell you that lying, or subterfuge, is sometimes necessary and righteous, when warranted (when it's done to protect good people against evil people). This situation from Kyle isn't.

We will win because we have aligned with truth, because it's perfect, infinite, immortal, and immutable, and evil will lose because they have intentionally turned their backs to it.

9
TickleTh1sElmo 9 points ago +10 / -1

You can be against BLM and not be a white supremacist. BLM believes that black people need to be held in higher regard than any other race.

12
hereticpatriot 12 points ago +13 / -1

No shit. It’s not us he’s has to prove it too though. Also maybe you haven’t noticed but he’s also under severe threat.

3
War_Hamster 3 points ago +4 / -1

Yeah, but those doing the threatening don't care what he says or does. He's a symbol to them that must be destroyed. They don't care about the truth.

4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

I oppose BLM just for the fact that they call themselves "Black Lives Matter," which is not only manipulative to begin with, but an insulting strawman argument to boot

6
deleted 6 points ago +10 / -4
1
Defund_Soros 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thank you! Him commenting on Black Lies Matter does not hurt or help his cases. Are these people cool with Drew Brees now for reversing his take on kneeling? People have said similar things that Kyle did and have been thrown away (rightfully) I don’t know why everyone is so hellbent on protecting this kid.

No wonder we are losing the war, we still have idiots supporting a terrorist group.

1
wethepepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

Found the cluey person in here!

1
JesusisKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

why the fuck would he even want to deal with that in public anyway

12
Frog_Anne 12 points ago +14 / -2

His support is probably like most people's "support." They're told that it's just saying "black lives matter," and they think, well sure people matter. They have no idea the organization is run by dedicated Marxists and spreads communist ideas, and don't realize that the scumbags rioting and burning down cities are a deliberate strategy, not some unrelated group.

Of course, the other possibility is he's being targeted by millions of nuts, and hopes this will make some of them calm down.

4
War_Hamster 4 points ago +6 / -2

It's also entirely reasonable to notice that our judicial and prison system quite often is biased against black people. The criminal system absolutely sucks.

The issue is that BLM's solution requites a Marxist revolution, while I suggest that if we just got these criminals out of power, we could solve that relatively easily.

4
TrannyClausSliceDice 4 points ago +4 / -0

Biased against black people how?

2
War_Hamster 2 points ago +4 / -2

It's biased against poor people. Many blacks are poor. And that's without talking about the fact that young black men carry a certain stigma in the legal system, albeit mostly deserved.

6
Dlrnemesis 6 points ago +10 / -4

That is his only fault. No bodies perfect

12
Ammosexual 12 points ago +13 / -1

He made 3 bodies perfect.

2
TickleTh1sElmo 2 points ago +2 / -0

2 and a byecep

1
deleted 1 point ago +1 / -0
4
CaptainHempbeard 4 points ago +5 / -1

He saw what they were about that night a year ago. He had to shoot his way out.

2
unclebobinator 2 points ago +3 / -1

Yup he knows. But he's gotta say that for multiple reasons. His coming civil lawsuit, desperate attempt at rebuilding his public image, etc. He has to play how hand close as fuck to his chest.

4
CaptainHempbeard 4 points ago +5 / -1

Exactly. Anyone who is getting upset over the comment doesn't understand the whole scenario. They just want to be upset over something stupid.

1
LtPatterson 1 point ago +1 / -0

That clip was a bit short on context and looped into defamation, I think he said it in terms of their right to protest or whatever, not get violent. Hell, he may even mean he thinks "black lives matter" verbatim is ok, but their underlying cause is def not.

1
TrannyClausSliceDice 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well he also said the justice system targets POC’s and “if they did this to me, someone with white pRiVlAgE imagine what they can do to a POC”

I still support him fully but disagree vehemently.

1
NeoAeon 1 point ago +1 / -0

To me this is covered by when he admitted to being surprised at what liars the media are.

I'm pretty sure he'll have a different opinion once he's had time to check them out in detail. To date he's been focused on more pressing matters.

1
LtPatterson 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought it was hilarious. He is using their language on purpose. Gives credence to his being there as apolitical. Helps in civil cases and defamation since he's never given a statement before on this. People act like Kyle is suddenly a 1st rate politician.

68
KeepMarxInTheGround 68 points ago +71 / -3

"It wasn't Kyle Rittenhouse on trial, it was the right to self-defense on trial."

This kid. 🥲

6
4
PennsylPede1776 4 points ago +4 / -0

I knew it was going to be that before clicking on it, but I had hoped it would be the Hulk Hogan video. https://youtu.be/eX_k5_egUAo

1
CaptainHempbeard 1 point ago +2 / -1

More people need to know that it is a Rick Derringer tune.

1
Whitespace 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just for the record, this "kid" is more of a man than most men will ever be.

Btw KMITG, this isn't a criticism of you personally. Just putting it out there.

51
CletusVanDam 51 points ago +51 / -0

I can’t wait to see him with 1,000 acres in Montana with 14 vehicles, a 19,000 sq ft house, and a gigantic wall surrounding his compound.

31
Tiredofthisbullshit 31 points ago +32 / -1

And a very wonderful conservative wife and 5 kids

12
conservativeyuppie 12 points ago +12 / -0

Only 5? We need to up those numbers if we're gonna take back this country.

6
Tiredofthisbullshit 6 points ago +6 / -0

Dont need more kids to take back the country. Those of us who are here now need to take care of it

1
Whitespace 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea, this guy needs to be a Ghengis Kahn type. Just pillage the universities.

Like the Conan line: "What is best in life? To crush your enemies, see them driven before you, and to hear the lamentations of their women!"

2
hey_spike 2 points ago +2 / -0

He will need a security force to keep away all the based chicks chasing him.

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's not a conservative. He should get a BLM wife like he wants. In fact, he shoudl go to BLM unarmed. You know. Be with his people. See how that goes.

2
MayorMcSixaplix 2 points ago +2 / -0

And a satellite dish to monitor his ownership of CNN.

47
deleted 47 points ago +47 / -0
12
GBA4ever 12 points ago +12 / -0

Using him staying in jail for fundraising. Grifter.

41
deleted 41 points ago +42 / -1
4
BigIronBigIron 4 points ago +4 / -0

...It doesn't. Unless you're sided with a group of paramilitary Marxist revolutionaries with foreign backing, then the FBI will suck your toes.

2
Geeee 2 points ago +2 / -0

You mean the ones he supports?

38
sum_ting_wong 38 points ago +38 / -0

"I BELIEVE GOD HAS BEEN ON MY SIDE SINCE THE BEGINNING"

12
bucknutties 12 points ago +12 / -0

AND SO HAVE THE PEOPLE!!!!

3
JesusisKing 3 points ago +3 / -0

so many prayers. i didnt even need to watch this interview just from the first footage you can tell about him.

36
Just_An_Idahoan 36 points ago +36 / -0

Shots fired at Lynn Wood 👀

1
I_Only_Win 1 point ago +1 / -0

Kyle hits his shots that’s for sure

35
TDmaga 35 points ago +36 / -1

This kid is amazingly brave

35
Skinagrizz 35 points ago +35 / -0

He just said, "Well, we all know how the FBI works..." Laugh out fucking loud

29
cnn_is_trash 29 points ago +29 / -0

Lynn wood is a grifting cocksucker. He kept Kyle in jail to keep the donations coming.

8
bucknutties 8 points ago +8 / -0

exactly this...wanted to garner sympathy from the public and now I think the MF'er is actually trying to sue for the money raised for Kyle!

29
DeplorableLA 29 points ago +29 / -0

Thank you!!

56
IMMORTAN_TRUMP 56 points ago +57 / -1

LYNN WOOD A CONFIRMED FAGGOT AND GRIFTER! Stop supporting him!

31
RalphWiggum 31 points ago +32 / -1

Lifelong Democrat parading around Georgia telling Republicans to not vote in the senate runoff. Who woulda thought

3
MAGA1775 3 points ago +3 / -0

I remember when that article came out revealing he was a registered Democrat and actively voted in Dem elections up until 2020.

Lin Wood threw a tantrum on Twitter.

I thought it was a little suspicious how someone could immediately go from registered/lifelong Democrat to some ultra-MAGA outspoken "patriot" almost overnight.

Unfortunately, at least 90%+ of this place still backed up and defended Lin Wood at the time.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +1 / -2
1
RalphWiggum 1 point ago +1 / -0

More so that grifters are gonna grift

1
DeplorableLA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t support him…I was thanking OP for the reminder about Kyle being on Tucker. (I rarely watch videos posted, sorry)

28
deleted 28 points ago +28 / -0
2
JesusisKing 2 points ago +2 / -0

fed indictment inbound

26
crewdog 26 points ago +26 / -0

Holy shit. He dissed the FBI. Love this kid.

25
FrankZappaSA 25 points ago +30 / -5

I wish Kyle wouldn’t say that he supports BLM. I mean, I get the right to peacefully protest and all, but they weren’t, aren’t, and they never will.

27
hereticpatriot 27 points ago +28 / -1

Do you think is would be smart for Kyle to say blm is bad when he’s about to sue the defamers for calling him a white supremacist? They would just say we told ya so, he’s slamming blm.

2
FrankZappaSA 2 points ago +3 / -1

“Smart” or not, it’s the truth to say that they are bad. And the truth always wins, eventually.

Using violence or the threat of violence to get your way isn’t a good or productive thing to do for ANY side, unless you want a war. Which, I’m pretty sure they do.

2
I_Only_Win 2 points ago +2 / -0

Art of the deal my friend

2
CanadianPede2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Successfully suing CNN, MSNBC, etc, will do more good for truth than him stating a truthful opinion on Tucker.

1
FrankZappaSA 1 point ago +1 / -0

See, to me, suing CNN & MSNBC into the Stone Age would be the equivalent of the truth winning.

But I fear his pro-BLM comments may be destructive to that end.

24
tree_sloth4 24 points ago +28 / -4

I'm going to get downvoted to hell but fuck it. Not everyone marching in those BLM things is a bad person. Some of them are just misguided and naive and think BLM is a noble cause. Of course many of them are evil and want to do harm and there's always the group taking advantage of fools to look like they're righteous. But many of the people are just not smart enough to see the scam of BLM. They think they're doing the right thing.

10
Athena86 10 points ago +10 / -0

I support the idea that Black Lives Matter. I don’t support the organization Black Lives Matter.

7
FrankZappaSA 7 points ago +7 / -0

I mean, I think most everyone here would say that… but the whole thing is manipulative.

It would be like starting an organization named “don’t kick puppies” and using it to violently push an agenda. Same thing.

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +1 / -0

BLM != blm. I think that’s true for many of us. But the Marxists are brilliant at word play. They know that by calling the organization Black Lives Matter, they can immediately castigate their critics as racist. You wouldn’t dare challenge the sacred narrative or their motives and end goals. Same goes for Planned Parenthood. Of course parenthood should be planned and well thought out and families should be physically and financially equipped to bring a child into this world. But if you dare raise a hand against Planned Parenthood Inc., well you just hate children and women’s right to an on demand abortion. Tricky wording to catch their opponents off guard

0
Tellman125 0 points ago +1 / -1

deceptive wording, yes exactly

3
deleted 3 points ago +4 / -1
1
toasty867 1 point ago +2 / -1

This

3
YouFellAsleep-WakeUp 3 points ago +3 / -0

truth

1
grad16uc 1 point ago +1 / -0

Moreover, you can say you support BLM's right to protest and leave it at that. It's annoying and insufferable, but I stand by their right to do it. Can't judge the good (or in this case the gullible) by the bad apples.

2
Whitespace 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yea, but we know that's not what blm is about. It's like saying we support ISIS's right to criticize American empire.

Yea, no. I don't give a fuck what their rights are. They're terrorists whose sole purpose is destruction. I am 100% against police brutality and the prison state. But look at how the BLM types responded to Rittenhouse "Throw away the key."

Hell, even the Democratic Party's KKK was against rape.

There is nothing, absolutely nothing redeeming about BLM.

1
conservativeyuppie 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's why I call them useful idiots. Not the people who started or run BLM, they know what they're doing. I mean Jose the cholo or Jamal the homie you knew from back in high school who get an emotional response from the media propaganda telling them they're being hunted down and falling for the Bolshevik bullshit.

10
Shrillary 10 points ago +10 / -0

He'll figure it out eventually

8
Cyer6 8 points ago +8 / -0

I will give him a pass on this. I didn't like the comment but you have to take everything he did that night and the days before into consideration. He was a volunteer fire cadet, cleaned graffiti, put out fires and handled business like no one else we've ever seen. He also doesn't speak highly of the left and the MSM. He also just shot an arrow at the FBI which was right on point. He knows what's up and should be allowed some leeway after what he's been through.

5
stucklikegluetoMAGA 5 points ago +5 / -0

Perfectly said. I fully agree.

3
WaxMyBallsBernie 3 points ago +3 / -0

That's how he's gonna collect his checks from the media

He was just defending the 1st amendment, and he ended up defending the 2nd amendment better than anyone else we've seen in years

1
FrankZappaSA 1 point ago +1 / -0

I get it, but it could have been a LOT better phrased.

22
Goozmania 22 points ago +22 / -0

I'm proud of myself for calling out Lin Wood early... Fuck Lin Wood.

9
maga_mama_757 9 points ago +9 / -0

I liked Lin Wood...until I watched a "press conference" he and Sidney Powell did in GA before the senate runoff. It wasn't a press conference, it was a weird rally, and he started telling the crowd voting was a waste of their time and not to vote in the runoff. I was so confused, thinking WTF IS HE DOING!? I understood the sentiment, given the steal just a month before, but we still have to vote.

After that I watched him more carefully and concluded he was a nutjob, with just enough truth splashed in here and there to keep him just credible enough for his 'fans.'

2
MAGA1775 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lin Wood was a lifelong Democrat and an active registered Democrat and voted in Dem elections right up until nearly 2020. I thought it was odd how someone could go from that to some ultra-MAGA outspoken "patriot" overnight.

Then I dug into his history, especially the lawsuit filed against him from his former partners. That really revealed how unhinged he was. Threatened to fuck his partners wives, threatened their children, assaulted someone in an elevator, refers to himself as the "second coming of Jesus," etc.

Then there was repeating all the unvetted, batshit insane claims and lies with the 2020 steal. Constantly claiming he had "evidence" but would never release it.

Turns out he just used the MAGA movement to try and establish a political career for himself, since his personal and work life completely fell apart.

Lin Wood is a mentally deranged, grifting scumbag.

6
IHeartMyDoggy 6 points ago +7 / -1

You should be. He had me fooled.

4
ccxn 4 points ago +4 / -0

I’m pretty sure I got downvoted on this site for warning about Lin Wood but I’m so glad we’ve grown past him.

1
jubyeonin 1 point ago +1 / -0

The feds prop him up every few months and pretend that everyone liked him all along. It will keep happening.

2
LtPatterson 2 points ago +2 / -0

I knew he was hopium, but we had nothing else there for a while. Once it became obvious Trump wasn't going to do shit I gave up on Lin and his ilk. Sick sick demented man.

1
MAGA1775 1 point ago +1 / -0

Me too. At the time, those of us who were calling him out were called "commies", "traitors", and "doomers."

Fuck Lin Wood. He pretty much derailed the entire Stop The Steal legal fight.

1
shadows_of_the_mind 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been calling his ass out since Nov2020. Downvotecucks and Qtards take the L

22
kavanaughs_beer 22 points ago +22 / -0

I thought he did well. God bless him and his mom for the position they’ve been put in.

21
darkmodelogon 21 points ago +21 / -0

FUCK LIN WOOD

21
DeplorableEsq 21 points ago +21 / -0

FBI kill shot!

6
hey_spike 6 points ago +6 / -0

How can the FBI respond? No, no, no, we really don't work THAT way?

20
45FortheWin 20 points ago +20 / -0

Kyle: We all know hiw the FBI works. Savage!

20
here2red 20 points ago +20 / -0

ooooh boom "We all know how the FBI works!"

20
ckover9000 20 points ago +20 / -0

Pierce and Wood seething right now LOL

19
CisThiccDummy 19 points ago +19 / -0

"We all know how the FBI works" - Kyle. What a fuckin stud.

18
PorchLightOn 18 points ago +19 / -1

Kyle must have an old soul. He really has a good grasp on the realities of his situation, his answers are so spot on.

"This is something I wish never would have happened, but it did, and we can't change that."

"I believe God has been on my side, from the beginning."

Amen to that. I've thought that from the start, right through to the acquittal. Divine intervention playing a role.

17
I_am_the_glowie 17 points ago +17 / -0

Holy shit. This is a great interview.

17
here2red 17 points ago +17 / -0

there goes Lin Wood's career

4
bucknutties 4 points ago +4 / -0

it's sad he's already rich beyond belief with several firms that don't have his name on them...

16
Bigmike65 16 points ago +16 / -0

Kyle slamming Lyn Wood lol

15
based_trekkie 15 points ago +15 / -0

Kyle is such a non-complainer.... damn!

14
based_trekkie 14 points ago +14 / -0

The fact he is bitching about Lin Wood after putting up with shitty conditions in jail make me really HATE Lin Wood the Grifter.

15
ThunderInYourHeart 15 points ago +15 / -0

Just saw about him not having running water. WTF.

15
DeplorableEsq 15 points ago +16 / -1

How can you not love this kid?

15
Savagemuderfucher 15 points ago +15 / -0

Fuck Lin Wood

15
1776ThereIsaidIt 15 points ago +15 / -0

hE pLaYeD sPaDeS... wHiTe sUpReMaRaCY

14
everylastjuan 14 points ago +14 / -0

Lin wood sucks

14
levarrishawk 14 points ago +14 / -0

On behalf of the people of Naples, FL. We would welcome you here Kyle. Move here anyway.

14
deleted 14 points ago +14 / -0
14
IHeartMyDoggy 14 points ago +15 / -1

I can’t believe how great he is in this interview. Hard to imagine he is only 18. I would be a basket case if all this happened to me.

8
maga_mama_757 8 points ago +8 / -0

I'm wondering if he was always this mature, or if what happened to him forced him to mature.

Probably a little of both.

7
PorchLightOn 7 points ago +7 / -0

Another pede posted an article that said Kyle's father had drug/alcohol problems. His parents divorced, there were physical abuse charges towards his mother that were dropped. At one point Kyle, his mother, and his two sisters were living in a homeless shelter. Kyle worked jobs as a teenager to support his family. So that's probably where a lot of that surprising maturity came from.

Edited to add the link: https://heavy.com/news/michael-mike-rittenhouse-kyle-father/

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree! I particularly liked when he said he supported BLM and that he had white privilege

1
RPD2 1 point ago +1 / -0

He let himself down when he said that. He probably felt he needed a shower after that.

14
d_bokk 14 points ago +18 / -4

Rittenhouse "supports" BLM only in the sense that he doesn't like corrupt prosecutors, from first hand experience. So of course, the stormfags just glowed at the opportunity to misinform.

EDIT: When asked if he thought there were going to do anything about the threats made against him and others, he says "You know how the FBI is."

2
ApexVeritas 2 points ago +2 / -0

Calling people you disagree with "stormfag" is what the left does.

-1
d_bokk -1 points ago +1 / -2

The Qfags said the same thing when I called them that.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

Logic is the best way mortals can discern truth, and everything that it means and entails. Your argument is illogical, meaning it's antithetical to truth, because it suggests that because someone else did something, that therefore it's fine if you do it. Act righteously, in accordance with truth. If you don't know what it is, then seek it yourself, or ask others. There is no shame to this. We're mortal, we can't know everything. We're all at different points along the path, but we all must walk it, and if someone truly cares about you, they'll help you.

1
d_bokk 1 point ago +1 / -0

If logic is so important, why do you use sophistry?

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

How did I use sophistry?

0
d_bokk 0 points ago +1 / -1

A full paragraph and you said nothing at all.

1
ApexVeritas 1 point ago +1 / -0

False, but you're welcome to be wrong. Just because you don't want to accept what I said doesn't mean it's wrong, or "said nothing at all". You're using it as an excuse to avoid addressing it or refuting it.

1
Geeee 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's an outright lie, he also says he thinks it'd have been worse if eh was not white

-3
deleted -3 points ago +6 / -9
6
Defund_Soros 6 points ago +8 / -2

The black worship from people is making me sick. “What he really meant is...” “not all BLM supporters are bad.” Fuck all of you, that terrorist group has destroyed millions of lives over scum simply because of their skin color. They also have threatened Kyle and his family and actively want him dead.

I’m happy the kid is free, never should have been charged in the first place but I’m not going to sit here and listen to someone say they support a black terrorist group. Kid has a long way to go before he’s fully gets it.

0
JesusisKing 0 points ago +2 / -2

no youre being 1 dimensional and immature, it would be asking too much of him to also after all that go on to say anything negative at all about anyone not directly involved in the trail as it pertains to him ei the mayor.

to expect a 17 year old to also then articulate a negative message against an organization thats been around since he was TEN is you being unrealistic.

Would it be great for us? actually not really. no.

3
Defund_Soros 3 points ago +3 / -0

I say the person defending a terrorist organization is the immature one...go suck some more black cock. Black Lies Matter is involved in this trial since they stood outside intimidating the jury and making death threats to Kyle and his family. People like you are pathetic defending what he said. He’s not god you know, he can say something fucking stupid and get called out for it.

1
JesusisKing 1 point ago +1 / -0

if you expect him to say that tho you just arent present in whats happening.

-1
deleted -1 points ago +5 / -6
13
e_pluribus_unum9 13 points ago +13 / -0

Amazing young man. Articulate, firm in his belief, decent.

12
tree_sloth4 12 points ago +12 / -0

Lin Wood BTFO

11
DeplorableEsq 11 points ago +11 / -0

I missed the day Kyle took the stand during his trial but it's clear why his lawyers thought it was a good idea.

8
KMacsBinder 8 points ago +8 / -0

Richards said in a post-trial interview that you have to put the Defendant on the stand in that part of Wisconsin if you want any chance to win a self defense case.

6
deleted 6 points ago +6 / -0
3
45FortheWin 3 points ago +4 / -1

I'm guessing his lawyers cautioned against it. But I believe Kyle really wanted to tell his story.

8
YoLLamaIsSoFat 8 points ago +8 / -0

Nah, they did two mock trials. One with Kyle testifying and one without, they had much better results in the one he took the stand on.

They all wanted him up there and it worked well in his favor.

8
deleted 8 points ago +8 / -0
10
keepamericagreat102 10 points ago +11 / -1

Tucker makes good points, we as a nation are in fucked up place. Left controls, harasses is, and beats us with their blm thugs.

10
Herpawinski 10 points ago +10 / -0

About Biden's statement "It's actually malice to say something like that."

Oh shit he gonna sue!