2460
Comments (123)
sorted by:
74
13Kosher_Society66 74 points ago +74 / -0

RIP... shit still rips my soul everytime i see it. WE WILL NEVER FORGET

75
Sylvester1212 75 points ago +78 / -3

Same people who planned it are still pulling the strings. Remember a guy winning a presidential election from his basement?

53
King5150 53 points ago +60 / -7

anyone who thinks a bearded man in a cave, orchestrated and funded this operation belongs in an asylum and will happily believe Joe Biden got 81 million legitimate votes and is doing a great job in running America.

22
IrishExit 22 points ago +24 / -2

Great documentary on what really happened.

https://youtu.be/xEZAXFbAnbA

24
cucumbersandwich 24 points ago +30 / -6

What really happened was lots of visuals to fool the public as control demolitions took place. Our government was involved. The owned media covered up everything. That's what happened. To this day, no one that pulled the strings has been hung.

10
fat50 10 points ago +10 / -0

no one that pulled the strings has been hung.

Except big Mike!

4
DrVeryStableGEOTUS 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lol you really took it there huh?

6
fat50 6 points ago +6 / -0

I'd say it's the most entertaining way to teach proper grammar(re: hanged v. hung).

4
Snooptwo 4 points ago +5 / -1

? I watch the plane hit the tower live. Thousands of people still there and watched it in person. Planes flew into the towers. It’s insane to claim they didn’t. The only controlled demolition I saw was tower 7. I never understood the towers as controlled demolitions, and I’ve watched everything I could on it. Tower 7 is fucky. The pentagon is fucky. The towers coming down makes perfect sense. Jet fuel absolutely can weaken steel, and as the air is compressed by the collapsing building it will blow out the windows below and push debris out of them, which is what many claim is evidence of the controlled demolition.

I don’t understand why it’s difficult to believe that they could buy plane tickets, get box cutters on board, hijack it, and fly the plane into those giant towers. Pentagon, idk that’s a really difficult maneuver and the utter lack of CCTV footage is suspect af, including the manipulated footage they showed. But flying a plane that has already taken off into a giant skyscraper is not that difficult. If I can take off and land an V-22 Osprey on my first go in the sim (although it was a Rocky landing no doubt) directing a plane into a building would be a piece of cake.

Belittling those of us who haven’t been convinced is a bit silly too.

6
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 6 points ago +6 / -0

The towers coming down makes perfect sense. Jet fuel absolutely can weaken steel, and as the air is compressed by the collapsing building it will blow out the windows below and push debris out of them, which is what many claim is evidence of the controlled demolition.

That's not the issue. Let's say the damaged area did have melted steel (even though the initial construction testing showed the metal as is was safe for 12+ hours before melting at those temps), it would have made perfect sense for the top of the buildings to break and fall off the side, or to collapse in on itself, and have the damage to come to some kind of equilibrium several floors below. But that's not what happened, the entire healthy building below was demolished without a single floor left. No slab of wall was left standing. If the top part was larger than the healthy part below, that could work, but the top damaged part for both towers was less than a third of the building.

Try this thought experiment. Imagine you stacked 11 washing machines on top of each other and welded them together. Then you took a bazooka and fired at washing machine #8, blowing most of it away. It crumbles and washing machines #9, #10, and #11 comes crashing down on #7. What happens to #7? How about #6? What about #3, #2, and #1? In your mental viewing of this scenario, are all 11 washing machines utterly reduced to rubble, with nothing significant of #1, #2, and #3 remaining?

Because of the above, is why people believe the buildings coming down was not a natural collapse. Seeing explosions in a healthy part of the building some 20-40 floors below the damaged area, which only blows out a window or two is what make people believe this unnatural collapse was specifically of the controlled demolition variety, but it's not the evidence of why the building collapse itself does not appear to be naturally occurring from some fires.

0
Spicemustfiow 0 points ago +1 / -1

Omg.

Comparing washing machines to 100 purpose built floors of concrete designed to stay upright and structurally support at the walls is definitely the most retarded thing I am going to hear today.

And I have not even seen my family for thanksgiving yet.

If you hit a stack of something and the stack doesn’t fall from the initial blow then the propensity is absolutely for gravity to take over if it does later on.

With responses like this I understand why you guys attack fluoride.

If you didn’t, you’d have to explain your learning disability on genetics.

-1
anotherthing -1 points ago +3 / -4

Ask the Japanese Navy at Midway what jet fuel does to steel.

5
Parhelion12 5 points ago +6 / -1

The FBI sponsored their flight training. They were invited to kill so we could pass the Patriot Act.

4
ScoonerTuna 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well, if you thought building 7 was controlled and the other buildings came down so beautifully while being struck by outside forces going at massive speeds I would think the chances to have two 1000 ft tall buildings fall onto their own foot print would have been statistically impossible. Those buildings had massive center structures that the discovery channel left out. You can look up the pics of them being constructed decades ago. I’m pretty sure it’s impossible what is claimed by media ie pancake theory. Shit controlled demolitions go wrong from time to time and these two buildings should have fallen into other buildings.

1
cucumbersandwich 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm mostly agreeing with you. I was there too. Planes hit the towers according to plan. The point I disagree with is that the planes took down the twin towers. They did not. The buildings where demolished with controlled demolitions. It was an inside job by the people that control the government.

0
Spicemustfiow 0 points ago +1 / -1

They just attack the weakest parts of the narrative and it’s likely just posted here in order to create dissent.

The same people are attacking the very notion of 19 hijackers below.

You could do it with one hijacker if you took the pilot out. You don’t even need 5. Maybe an extra to keep track outside. That’s it.

Documentaries like loose change were claiming there were Cessna parts and that thing was heavily circulated for years.

The missile hitting the pentagon is outright ridiculous as well.

Like you said you can literally watch it on tv.

These people can’t be reasoned with.

It’s not that dissimilar to kids who hate on specific denominations of religion because their parents were shitty people.

Accepting their parents are shitty is too disruptive to their being so they have to marginalize something else to emotionally adjust.

The 9/11 arguments are the same thing. Only they have had 20 years to figure out which stuff is received the best.

If the planes weren’t televised they would be questioning that.

Notice how they aren’t saying “jet fuel can’t melt steel beams” anymore either. That got disproven so now they make a more nuanced argument.

It’s just a giant game of moving the goal post.

You didn’t even need the buildings to collapse to have 9/11 resonate.

They can’t recognize this though because the demolition narrative is simply the easiest to argue

They can’t argue what they saw on tv. They can’t argue what was widely reported. And they can’t argue common sense.

They don’t have a narrative, they just ask stupid questions and just stress the ones that are hardest to refute.

It’s retarded.

1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yet......

-3
STONKATRUCK -3 points ago +5 / -8

Are you or do you know any demolishonists? If you do they will probably tell you you're a fucking moron.

1
Dingus 1 point ago +4 / -3

yoU suRe yoU ainT no jeW? We DonT takE kiNdly to no jEws rouNd hErE.

1
Snooptwo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Huh?

0
cucumbersandwich 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've been on the teams. They were controlled demolitions and yes, they agree. Don't know what universe you live in.

1
STONKATRUCK 1 point ago +1 / -0

Negative

10
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 10 points ago +10 / -0

There are 3,000 architects along with investigators and leading forensic structural engineers that have proven 911 was caused by demolitions. See architects and engineers for truths site.

They provided all the evidence to Barr and he has remained silent and done NOTHING with the information. In April of 2020, Bar refused to release documents citing national security concerns.

Here is the extensive 4 year computer modeling data that brought down building 7. It wasn't fire and debris or exploding diesel, it was there near simultaneous destruction of every support column.

The report, models and 900GB of open data can all be found there.

This video should be seen by everyone. It's not tin foil hat BS. It's from the first responders that were there and engineers that have studied the evidence. It was originally streamed live on Sep 11, 2019, the 18th anniversary of the September 11th attacks presented by 9/11 first responder Christopher Gioia, a commissioner of the Franklin Square and Munson Fire District in New York

Here's the BBC video reporting on the collapse of building 7 before it actually collapsed.

Fireman describe hearing explosions

Trump shortly after 9/11 saying a plane by itself without some kind of aid should not have been able to penetrate the steel beams. He reminds people of the structural strength of the building and how it survived a bombing at its foundation.

Larry Silverstein where he says , "They made the decision to pull it"

Multiple view points of building 7 collapsing in it's own footprint with no structural resistance at free fall gravity speeds.

Here is the side of building 7 that took the brunt of the damage. Surface damage along with burning office equipment was supposedly enough to bring down building 7 with the same efficiency as vaporizing every support column within a second of each other.

At the 3:17 mark of this video, there is a building with MAJOR structural damage MUCH worse than building 7 and it doesn't just collapse neatly in on itself, vaporizing into dust. It sways and then topples over in a rolling motion. Buildings don't just collapse conveniently in their own footprint, reduced to ruble and dust within seconds with out expertly planned intentional intervention.

The first critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F) is where steel loses about half its strength.
Steel will melt at 1510 degrees C (2750°F). That kind of heat should be able to incinerate humans instantly, how then were there testimony from survivors at or near the impact site?

Here are statements from three eye-witnesses that provide evidence that the heating due to the jet fuel was indeed minimal.

Donovan Cowan was in an open elevator at the 78th floor sky-lobby (one of the impact floors of the South Tower) when the aircraft hit. He has been quoted as saying: 

"We went into the elevator. As soon as I hit the button, that's when there was a big boom. We both got knocked down. I remember feeling this intense heat. The doors were still open. The heat lasted for maybe 15 to 20 seconds I guess. Then it stopped."

Stanley Praimnath was on the 81st floor of the South Tower: 

"The plane impacts. I try to get up and then I realize that I'm covered up to my shoulder in debris. And when I'm digging through under all this rubble, I can see the bottom wing starting to burn, and that wing is wedged 20 feet in my office doorway."

Ling Young was in her 78th floor office:

 "Only in my area were people alive, and the people alive were from my office. I figured that out later because I sat around in there for 10 or 15 minutes. That's how I got so burned."

Neither Stanley Praimnath nor Donovan Cowan nor Ling Young were cooked by the jet fuel fire. All three survived.

2
Crownius 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not to mention that burning fuel from the planes doesn't burn hot enough to melt the steel. Just sayin..

1
Spicemustfiow 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think “X amount of ‘experts’ signing a letter” is a great argument to be convincing people around here.

1
BlmAnimalFarmFodder 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thats a valid point and I agree that I don't think a letter signed by thousands of people would be very convincing either. I'm not sure I have come across the letter you are referring to though, but if you have it, I'll take it under consideration and look into it.

I have come across a multi year computer modeling study with over 900GB of data that is open for anyone to critique if they have any interest in the matter to do so. Here are the sources to those materials should the topic be of any interest to them.

4
STONKATRUCK 4 points ago +8 / -4

A documentary made by someone whos balls haven't even dropped at the time it happened fuck off with that shit you retarded burn out

2
blackmanjim 2 points ago +2 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq9nUPs2RAk

This one is good too. Compares the glaring similarities from Pearl Harbor. Same playbook.

16
deleted 16 points ago +16 / -0
6
War_Hamster 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wish I could find the stuff I posted on Yahoo message boards at the time. It was mostly stuff suggesting very sarcastically that I couldn't imagine anything bad ever coming from giving the government this much surveillance power.

I freakin hate being right sometimes.

(Narrator: Those who question the government are almost always proven right eventually)

3
deleted 3 points ago +3 / -0
1
War_Hamster 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just listed to his audiobook again a few weeks ago.

16
WinkingPede 16 points ago +17 / -1

Seeing all the sheep today and how they've responded to this vaxx bs really explains why so many idiots wouldn't allow themselves to believe that our own government could pull something off as sinister as 9/11.

4
Snooptwo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I don’t doubt they could, or would. I doubt they did. Maybe they allowed it, like Pearl Harbor, but I still need some evidence. The pentagon shit is def really sus. Same with tower 7. Tower 1 and 2 got hit by planes. People watched it in person. Gavin McInnes was one of them. Is Gavin controlled opposition too? Lol good luck convincing anyone of that nonsense.

I think it’s more likely that the gov had prior knowledge snd didn’t act, or simply capitalized on the tragedy.

3
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 3 points ago +3 / -0

Are you familiar with Operation Northwoods from 1962? http://www.smeggys.co.uk/operation_northwoods.php

It was a DoD plan to start a war with Cuba by performing a number of false flag attacks against US targets. Page 10 onwards lists a bunch of the proposed false flags, which includes civilian plane hijacking and blowing up US military bases, along with controlled media to spread whatever message they wanted.

Everything that happened on 9/11 can be seen as a natural progression of the plans laid out here (please give them a read), with the target being Afghanistan instead of Cuba. It was definitely 100% part of the DoD playbook. Like you said though, the only question is whether they put the plan into action.

0
Spicemustfiow 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is the dumb stuff I hate.

You guys are just throwing shit against the wall.

Let’s assume 100% you’re right.

How do all the morons spamming this thread about “demolition” have anything to do with the government at all.

Were any of you kids alive on 9/11????

Literally everyone was freaked. The simple idea of crashing two planes would have been enough to achieve the societal transition.

If you’re the CIA or whatever the populace understanding the notion of a coordinated attack was clearly enough.

The most doubt is created by demolition so that’s what people argue now. What people miss is that demolition doesn’t logically connect to government malice. Focusing on that is just noise.

That’s the problem with everything in terms of 9/11 conspiracy. Once you accept one persons argument and plug it into the big picture shit continuously makes LESS sense, not more.

It’s why you can’t get a single one of you guys to create a narrative.

At least with JFK you can drop idea about Soviet plots or Lyndon Johnson.

With 9/11 once you go outside the mainstream narrative the stories all fall apart very quickly.

3
WinkingPede 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think the rabbit hole goes deeper than you think, but that's just my opinion.

1
SPEDMan64 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm in the same boat as you. I saw the second plane hit and felt the heat from the explosion--which was a surprising thing to me and why I remember it happening as I was about 500+ feet away when it hit). The Pentagon and Building 7 I have trouble explaining, and I don't recall work crews in 7 doing anything in the days leading up to 9/11 so I'm wondering when they could have planted the charges.

I am all for believing our government allowed it to happen ala Pearl Harbor to generate support for getting involved in the Middle East bullshit again. But the more I learned about American history, especially the history of the government itself, the more and more I have come to believe they are our biggest enemy.

8
President_Elect_Pepe 8 points ago +8 / -0

I mean objectively it was a bearded extremist trained by the CIA who had open access to communication tools and generally a normal lifestyle until we were told we had to care about him.

Clinton literally turned down opportunities to capture him.

In addition I think the lifestyles of the 19 guys were largely just funded through credit cards. Certainly even if that wasn’t true it’s definitely feasible given the situation.

0
TheMoreYouKnowOkay 0 points ago +1 / -1

How do you know which 19 guys hijacked the planes? You got video from inside those planes showing it? Or were 19 guys picked off the manifests solely due to being middle eastern? Even if these 19 guys were part of the hijacking, how do you know no one else on the planes were also involved?

0
President_Elect_Pepe 0 points ago +2 / -2

Why don’t you do this.

You tell me what happened on 9/11.

Then you can justify to me how you have evidence for the same standards that you just set for me.

What’s funny is that in terms of the claims I have made much of that evidence does exist.

There’s documented evidence of these men and who they were. There’s documented evidence of them at flight schools. There’s documented evidence of their credit card lifestyles. One of the most based actors in America saw them on a training run. That’s documented.

The whole reason the official narrative for 9/11 is accepted is because of the evidence that people can independently verify themselves.

If you want to question that then step up.

What are your claims? Where is your counter evidence?

I have just presented you with an amazing opportunity. You can be the first guy in the history of 9/11 conspiracy theories to stop acting like a pussy, to stop just acting concerned and posit a REAL alternate theory.

Go ahead.

Please do so, otherwise shut the fuck up with what is nothing more than a 20 year old concern troll.

Or even better, stop acting like a child in regard to trauma. Be a man and accept what happened.

Look I got no problem asking questions but you dumbass conspiracy guys act like you have a monopoly on questions and free thought.

Again, here you go Mr. free thought. Now is your chance to prove yourself.

I wasn’t 2 years old when 9/11 happened. I was an adult. You don’t think I had questions? You don’t think my standard for evidence was high?

You want to go LARP on a conspiracy board go ahead. You want to come at me and pretend like the burden of proof is on me and that I don’t have a cohesive narrative? Then you better have your own damn receipts.

We both know you don’t.

-1
TheMoreYouKnowOkay -1 points ago +1 / -2

You tell me what happened on 9/11. Then you can justify to me how you have evidence for the same standards that you just set for me.

I'm not one of the people who planned it. How should I know all the details of what happened? My claim is that the specifics of how it went down as in the official record is a little too specific for them to know. I'm asking you to think critically if they can possibly know the information they provided.

There’s documented evidence of these men and who they were. There’s documented evidence of them at flight schools. There’s documented evidence of their credit card lifestyles. One of the most based actors in America saw them on a training run. That’s documented.

And what evidence is there of these men hijacking any planes? How do I know other people weren't also in on it?

posit a REAL alternate theory

You're trying to reverse the burden of proof. Fantastic claims require fantastic evidence. I'm not claiming to know the specifics of anything, which does not require proof. There's plenty of alternate guesses out there, because there is no way to verify many of the details.

Or even better, stop acting like a child in regard to trauma. Be a man and accept what happened.

I accept that it happened, but I don't have to accept an explanation that has more holes than swiss cheese in it.

Look I got no problem asking questions but you dumbass conspiracy guys act like you have a monopoly on questions and free thought.

You're the one who claimed a conspiracy of 19 men. I made no such claims. I'm not claiming to you any of the ridiculous things you hear people claiming like holographic planes or the moon being a death star.

I wasn’t 2 years old when 9/11 happened. I was an adult. You don’t think I had questions? You don’t think my standard for evidence was high?

I was an adult when it happened too. I accepted the official story till a few years ago when I did a review of things I thought I knew. What evidence do you have to back up the official story that you can independently verify?

You want to come at me and pretend like the burden of proof is on me and that I don’t have a cohesive narrative?

How do you have a cohesive narrative is my question? Have you reviewed the evidence? Are you aware they had to bring in a special government team of scientists who claim to have invented a new method to gather DNA evidence, and their method of verifying the victims at the Pentagon? Are you aware the official PDF that the government gave out on this includes a sentence that because of this, their results are non-repeatable and cannot be independently verified?

Then you better have your own damn receipts.

Stop trying to reverse the burden of proof. I didn't make claim to know anything, or have secret sight inside the planes.

1
President_Elect_Pepe 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not one of the people who planned it.

Stopped reading at the first sentence.

I’m not here to perpetuate a “reasonable doubt” LARP or engage pretend ignorance.

You clearly had an agenda in your initial reply. You clearly disagree with me based on the mountain of words I just scrolled and intelligently am refusing to read.

No, I don’t accept your pretend ignorance. And honestly even if I did all it does is throw you into the group of millions of 9/11 deniers who want to play 20 questions rather than present a believable alternative hypothesis which could do some good if it was true.

I previously called you out on this and whatever mountain of bullshit is above completely validated my lengthy response.

Thanks for proving literally everything I suspected.

Blocked.

8
FromSethWithLove 8 points ago +8 / -0

You mean the guy with hairy legs that turn blonde in the sun?

8
OilofOyVey 8 points ago +8 / -0

Want to blow minds, show people what Rumsfeld was up to the day before regarding missing Pentagon money.

And then there is the Building 7 which was full of things that would have incriminated Deep State.

1
Mountainous 1 point ago +2 / -1

THIS👆!

3
Buck_Fiden 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is that the same guy that's spending a "long weekend" with the co-founder of the Carlyle Group?

It must be time for year-end reviews already.

3
BigLou 3 points ago +3 / -0

We truly live in a simulation. I just found out about Ryan Dawson and am currently watching the 9/11 panel and I check the win randomly and this is at the top of Hot?

10
Just_wanted_darkmode 10 points ago +10 / -0

We forgot, and now they are a protected class

8
Filthy_MALE 8 points ago +8 / -0

Think about the years following 2001.

Has anything gotten better in the last 20 years?

It may not have been orchestrated or even allowed to happen, but it sure as shit was exploited as much as possible.

10
Axiom502 10 points ago +10 / -0

If you told someone in 1999 what would happen for the next 20 years in the next century they would believe you were describing to them a dystopian science fiction hell scape.

2
covok48 2 points ago +2 / -0

They would have partied it up in ‘99 - Summer ‘01 then killed themselves.

2
yurimodin 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pretty much, 1999 was peak America. We all had futures to look forward to, the ChyNa trade deal hadn't robbed a whole generation yet. Testosterone was not only accepted but encouraged......tOxIk mAsCuLiNaTy was not a thing.

5
TheRougarou 5 points ago +5 / -0

Never forget that it was our own intelligence agencies that did it..

5
UndercoverCentipede 5 points ago +5 / -0

Bro we forgot

11
13Kosher_Society66 11 points ago +11 / -0

i never have

25
RogueLeaderX 25 points ago +25 / -0

We’re lucky 9/11 was 20 years ago. Could you imagine today?

21
FromSethWithLove 21 points ago +21 / -0

That's my exact reaction to Waukesha. Before Obama, this would've shook the fibers of this country. Normies haven't even heard of it or think it was a freak accident

5
covok48 5 points ago +5 / -0

If it had happened in the ‘90s the national anger would have been where it belongs.

18
King5150 18 points ago +18 / -0

the Dems would be blaming white people 💯for hurting some people's feelings who then "understandably" smashed planes into buildings.

15
deleted 15 points ago +15 / -0
8
BiteTheWaxTadpole 8 points ago +8 / -0

Exactly. I remember at the time many people having sentiments along the lines of “we deserved this”, “we had it coming”, “Islam is a religion of peace” ... people falling over themselves to be obsequious to Muslims, visit mosques, etc.

Nothing quite on the scale/intensity we see today, but it was there.

3
covok48 3 points ago +3 / -0

Mine wasn’t that bad, but there were sure a whole lot of Muslins crying on the TV insisting they were Americans.

7
NeverBeFat 7 points ago +7 / -0

You might not be old enough to remember, that was a theme. "What did we do to provoke them? It's all our fault!"

Dems then: Hate America
Dems now: Hate America

10
grad16uc 10 points ago +10 / -0

"Two planes crossed state lines"

1
covok48 1 point ago +1 / -0

Christ I never even thought about it that way.

20
deletedandredacted 20 points ago +20 / -0

“Some people did something” - some towel head in Congress.

2
sackofwisdom 2 points ago +2 / -0

Mostly peaceful mass murder.

14
RuprechtThaMonkeyBoy 14 points ago +14 / -0

I'm waiting for the "vaxxed pilot" runs into building excuse in the near future.

1
onestickyolo 1 point ago +1 / -0

it was because there was an unvaxxed person on the plane

9
KungPaoMcChicken 9 points ago +9 / -0

I want a Lego WTC set that includes the two planes, giant gapping holes in the side, and then with the press of a button the entire thing comes down. Though I have a feeling that it would be more difficult for a Lego WTC to collapse then the real thing. Those Lego connections are super strong, unlike the core steel columns that they couldn't be assed fireproofing.

7
CommieCrusher1 7 points ago +7 / -0

The feds are gonna think you’re planning an attack smh

1
KungPaoMcChicken 1 point ago +1 / -0

See, now you know why the first attack didn't work. Because they planned the entire thing out of some cheap Lego knock-off brand from China. That one fell to pieces.

1
TeaMug71 1 point ago +1 / -0

I think the first attack was to cover prep work on the basement and foundations. I remember seeing an arial photo of the site shortly after the towers fell. There were two huge holes in the ground. How the hell does that happen?!

4
13Kosher_Society66 4 points ago +4 / -0

fucking kek

9
Susurro 9 points ago +9 / -0

"Box-cutter" fight. Have some respect for the bruthas.

7
RyanUpCreek 7 points ago +7 / -0

Corn Pop had a razor and was probably a good dude

7
SavingPrivateGrace 7 points ago +7 / -0

Plain Plane Ramming

11
13Kosher_Society66 11 points ago +11 / -0

some people did somethings

7
WarViper1337 7 points ago +7 / -0

Clearly a plane ramming incident.

7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
deleted 7 points ago +7 / -0
7
HarvesterOfBallots 7 points ago +7 / -0

Anyone remember just a few months ago when knife fights were totally normal and have been a fun part of everyday life forever?

4
FromSethWithLove 4 points ago +4 / -0

LOLOL

4
PunishedSnek 4 points ago +4 / -0

They were military jets, remote controlled drones. Human pilots of commercial aircraft could not pull this off once, let alone twice. Debate me.

1
TeaMug71 1 point ago +1 / -0

I watched a documentary recently, 6 hours long. I’ll try and dig it up. Anyway, yeah it’s impossible for a commercial airliner to fly at full throttle speeds at sea level. Not gonna happen.

1
TeaMug71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Three times

3
sackofwisdom 3 points ago +3 / -0

Spicy 🌶 🥵

3
kronos6948 3 points ago +3 / -0

I still think that Flight 93 was shot down, and the hero story was concocted to keep people from freaking out about the US Military opening fire on US civilians.

1
TeaMug71 1 point ago +1 / -0

Flight 93? Hell, there was hardly any wreckage. Something went down but it wasn’t flight 93

3
XxxRDTPRNxxX 3 points ago +3 / -0

Remember when knife fights were just a harmless thing that every teenager does as a right of passage?

2
TeaMug71 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, lol

3
Salty-Pozzy 3 points ago +3 / -0

Totally Different... Terrorist ate a sandwich after plowing over everyone... FML

3
Snoman 3 points ago +3 / -0

I’m looking for some backstory leading up to 9/11, wether about the terrorists or the admin state. It’s difficult for many of us to buy in w/out understanding more of what led up to

1
TeaMug71 1 point ago +1 / -0
3
XlDEN 3 points ago +3 / -0

Fleeing Islamaphobia.

2
VolareVia 2 points ago +2 / -0

How the hell was 9/11 an inside job, if the planes came from the outside?

Don't be fuckin' stupid!

2
TheRougarou 2 points ago +2 / -0

That would only be a fair comparison if the fbi blew up the crowd after the car hit.

2
ihavethingstodo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ugh that gets you right in the feels. Sometimes people need to be shown this comparison to understand how manipulating words can be...

Call it what it is, pudding brains.

2
NeverBeFat 2 points ago +2 / -0

some people did something

2
Flipakademsarepedos 2 points ago +2 / -0

😂😂😂😂😂

2
TeaMug71 2 points ago +2 / -0
2
RedditAdminsRFascist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never thought I could laugh at this picture but r/the_donald derivative made me do it

1
Stanwyk74 1 point ago +1 / -0

But we got Sadam and elected a Hussein. Sweet.